Abstract
Generally, the second messenger bis-(3’-5’)-cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) regulates the switch between motile and sessile lifestyles in bacteria. Here, we show that c-di-GMP is an essential regulator of multicellular development in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. In response to starvation, M. xanthus initiates a developmental program that culminates in formation of spore-filled fruiting bodies. We show that c-di-GMP accumulates at elevated levels during development and that this increase is essential for completion of development whereas excess c-di-GMP does not interfere with development. MXAN3735 (renamed DmxB) is identified as a diguanylate cyclase that only functions during development and is responsible for this increased c-di-GMP accumulation. DmxB synthesis is induced in response to starvation, thereby restricting DmxB activity to development. DmxB is essential for development and functions downstream of the Dif chemosensory system to stimulate exopolysaccharide accumulation by inducing transcription of a subset of the genes encoding proteins involved in exopolysaccharide synthesis. The developmental defects in the dmxB mutant are non-cell autonomous and rescued by co-development with a strain proficient in exopolysaccharide synthesis, suggesting reduced exopolysaccharide accumulation as the causative defect in this mutant. The NtrC-like transcriptional regulator EpsI/Nla24, which is required for exopolysaccharide accumulation, is identified as a c-di-GMP receptor, and thus a putative target for DmxB generated c-di-GMP. Because DmxB can be—at least partially—functionally replaced by a heterologous diguanylate cyclase, these results altogether suggest a model in which a minimum threshold level of c-di-GMP is essential for the successful completion of multicellular development in M. xanthus.
Author Summary
The nucleotide-based second messenger c-di-GMP is ubiquitous in bacteria and generally regulates the switch between motile and sessile lifestyles. We show that c-di-GMP regulates multicellular morphogenesis and cellular differentiation during the starvation-induced developmental program that culminates in fruiting body formation in Myxococcus xanthus. DmxB is identified as a diguanylate synthase that is regulated at multiple levels and responsible for the increased c-di-GMP synthesis during development. A ΔdmxB mutant has reduced exopolysaccharide accumulation and is rescued by co-development with strains proficient in exopolysaccharide accumulation, suggesting reduced exopolysaccharide accumulation as the causative defect in this mutant. We propose that a minimum threshold level of c-di-GMP is required for successful completion of starvation-induced development in M. xanthus.
Introduction
Bacteria synthesize a variety of nucleotide-based second messengers that have important functions in adaptation and differentiation processes in response to environmental changes. Among these bis-(3’-5’)-cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) has emerged as ubiquitous and highly versatile. Regulation by c-di-GMP often relates to lifestyle changes involving transitions between motility and sessility with the specific processes regulated including motility, adhesion, exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis, biofilm formation, cell cycle progression and virulence [for reviews, see [1–3]]. However, c-di-GMP also regulates multicellular development and cellular differentiation processes that do not appear to relate to this transition such as aerial mycelium formation in Streptomyces venezuelae and heterocyst formation in filaments of Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 [4, 5]. c-di-GMP is synthesized from two molecules of GTP by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) [6, 7] that share the so-called GGDEF domain named after a conserved sequence motif in the active- (A) site [8]. GGDEF domains often contain an inhibitory-(I) site with the consensus sequence RxxD that binds c-di-GMP resulting in allosteric feedback inhibition of DGC activity [8]. c-di-GMP is degraded by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that contain either a catalytic EAL or HD-GYP domain both of which are also named after conserved sequence motifs in their active site [9–12]. c-di-GMP interacts with a range of effectors to regulate downstream responses at the transcriptional, (post-)translational or allosteric level, as well as by mediating protein-protein interactions [1, 5, 13]. Effectors include degenerate GGDEF and EAL domain proteins that do not have catalytic activity [14–18], different transcription factor families [5, 19–24], PilZ domain-containing proteins [25–31], and riboswitches [32].
In response to nutrient starvation, the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus initiates a multicellular developmental program that results in the formation of fruiting bodies that each contains ~100,000 spores [for review, see [33]]. Fruiting body formation proceeds in distinct morphological stages. After 4–6 hrs of starvation, the rod-shaped cells change motility behavior and start to aggregate to form translucent mounds [34]. By 24 hrs, the aggregation process is complete and those cells that have accumulated inside fruiting bodies differentiate to spherical spores with spore maturation completed by 72 hrs. While gliding motility is dispensable [35], type IV pili (T4P)-dependent motility is important for fruiting body formation and lack of T4P causes a delay or even blocks fruiting body formation while sporulation still proceeds [35, 36]. In M. xanthus T4P-dependent motility depends on EPS because it stimulates T4P retraction [37] and lack of EPS completely blocks fruiting body formation and sporulation [38–40]. EPS synthesis depends on the eps locus, which encodes structural proteins for EPS biosynthesis and transport [41]. Multiple regulators of EPS accumulation have been identified; however, only the NtrC-like transcriptional regulator EpsI/Nla24, which is encoded in the eps locus, and the Dif chemosensory system are essential for EPS synthesis [40–43]. Interestingly, lack of EPS causes a non-cell autonomous defect in development and development of mutants that lack EPS can be rescued by co-development with a strain proficient in EPS synthesis or by addition of purified EPS [38–40].
We recently demonstrated that M. xanthus accumulates c-di-GMP during growth and that c-di-GMP regulates T4P-dependent motility in growing cells by regulating transcription of the pilA gene, which encodes the major pilin of T4P, and EPS accumulation [44]. M. xanthus encodes 24 proteins containing a GGDEF, EAL or HD-GYP domain [15, 44]. A systematic genetic analysis using single gene mutations identified three of these genes (dmxA, sgmT and tmoK) as important for T4P-dependent motility whereas single mutations in the remaining 21 genes neither interfered with growth nor with motility [44]. Here, we identify c-di-GMP as an essential regulator of development in M. xanthus and show that reduced c-di-GMP levels cause a non-cell autonomous defect in EPS accumulation during development whereas increased c-di-GMP levels do not interfere with development. Moreover, we identify a novel DGC, DmxB, that only functions during development and is responsible for the increase in c-di-GMP levels that is essential for fruiting body formation and sporulation to go to completion. Moreover, we demonstrate that DmxB is essential for transcription of subset of genes involved in EPS synthesis and that the NtrC-like transcriptional regulator EpsI/Nla24 is a c-di-GMP receptor. Our results suggest a scenario in which a minimal threshold level of c-di-GMP is essential for progression of the developmental program in M. xanthus and binds to EpsI/Nla24 to stimulate EPS synthesis.
Results
c-di-GMP level increases significantly during development
We previously demonstrated that M. xanthus cells grown in suspension in rich medium accumulate c-di-GMP [44]. M. xanthus only forms fruiting bodies when starved on a surface. Therefore, to determine if M. xanthus accumulates c-di-GMP during development, exponentially growing wild-type (WT) DK1622 cells were removed from rich medium and starved on a solid surface in submerged culture for 48 hrs. c-di-GMP levels were quantified at different time points during development using liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry [45]. c-di-GMP was detected at all time points of development. The c-di-GMP level increased ~20-fold from 0 hrs (4.4 ± 0.7 pmol/mg protein) to 48 hrs (84.8 ± 15.9 pmol/mg protein) of development (Fig 1). To determine if this increase in c-di-GMP was a specific response to starvation and not to a solid surface, cells were exposed to starvation in suspension. Under these conditions, the c-di-GMP level also increased ~20-fold from 0 hrs (6.2 ± 0.7 pmol/mg protein) to 48 hrs (118.5 ± 35.0 pmol/mg protein) of starvation (Fig 1). While the c-di-GMP level increased ~20-fold under both starvation conditions, the c-di-GMP level was generally lower in cells starved on a solid surface. Moreover, the c-di-GMP accumulation profile was slightly different, i.e. cells starved on a surface showed a significant increase in c-di-GMP after 24 hrs and cells starved in suspension a significant increase after 6 hrs of starvation. Importantly, because the level of c-di-GMP does not increase significantly in stationary phase cells [44], these data demonstrate that the increase in the c-di-GMP level is a specific response to starvation and that the c-di-GMP level increases during development. Because the c-di-GMP levels in suspension-starved WT cells overall correlated with that in developing WT, we from now measured c-di-GMP levels in cells starved in suspension.
c-di-GMP level is important for fruiting body formation and sporulation
To determine if the c-di-GMP level is important for development, we used previously generated strains [44] that constitutively produce a heterologous DGC (DgcAWT of Caulobacter crescentus), a heterologous PDE (PA5295WT of Pseudomonas aeruginosa) or their active site variants DgcAD164A or PA5295E328A in WT cells. Production of DgcAWT and PA5295WT causes a significant increase and decrease, respectively in the c-di-GMP level during vegetative growth whereas the two active site variants do not [44]. Consistently, after 24 hrs of starvation in suspension, the c-di-GMP level was significantly increased in cells producing DgcAWT compared to WT and significantly decreased in cells expressing PA5295WT (Fig 2A).
On TPM agar as well as in submerged culture, WT and the strains producing DgcAD164A or PA5295E328A aggregated to form nascent fruiting bodies after 24 hrs and had formed darkened spore-filled fruiting bodies after 120 hrs (Fig 2B). The strain producing DgcAWT still formed fruiting bodies and sporulated but the fruiting bodies were smaller than in WT, possibly due to the defect that this strain has in T4P-dependent motility during vegetative growth [44]. By contrast, the PA5295WT producing strain displayed delayed fruiting body formation on TPM agar, did not form fruiting bodies in submerged culture even after 120 hrs and its sporulation was strongly reduced. We conclude that a decreased c-di-GMP level impedes fruiting body formation and sporulation whereas an increased level of c-di-GMP does not.
Identification of GGDEF, EAL and HD-GYP domain proteins important for development
We previously identified 24 genes in M. xanthus encoding proteins containing either a GGDEF (17 proteins), EAL (two proteins) or HD-GYP domain (five proteins) [15, 44]. Based on single gene mutations, three of these proteins are important for T4P-dependent motility: DmxA is a DGC, SgmT is a hybrid histidine protein kinase that binds c-di-GMP using its C-terminal degenerate GGDEF domain but does not have DGC activity, and TmoK is a hybrid histidine protein kinase with a C-terminal GGDEF domain that neither synthesizes nor binds c-di-GMP [15, 44].
To further investigate the function of these 24 proteins, we screened strains with single in-frame deletions in these genes or an insertion mutation in the case of dmxA for development-related phenotypes. Single gene mutations in 20 of the 24 genes did not affect development (S1 Fig). These 20 genes included dmxA and actA. ActA has previously been suggested to be important for development [46]. For generation of the in-frame deletion of actA, we reannotated actA taking into account the GC content in the third position of codons and by comparisons to orthologous genes (S2 Fig). Based on this re-annotation, the original ΔactA mutation extends into the promoter region of the act operon. actA is located upstream of actB, which is important for development (S2 Fig) [46]. Because the original ΔactA mutant phenocopies the ΔactB mutant, we speculate that the developmental defects observed for the original ΔactA mutant are caused by a polar effect on actB. We conclude that ActA is not required for development. Lack of the DGC DmxA did also not affect development and, thus, specifically causes a defect in T4P-dependent motility in vegetative cells.
As previously reported, lack of SgmT caused defects in fruiting body formation and sporulation [15]. Moreover, lack of TmoK caused delayed aggregation and reduced sporulation in submerged culture while aggregation was normal on TPM agar (S1 Fig).
Mutations in two genes caused developmental defects without affecting growth or motility in vegetative cells [44]. MXAN3735, henceforth DmxB (DGC from M. xanthus B), is a predicted cytoplasmic protein with an N-terminal receiver domain of two component system and a C-terminal GGDEF domain that contains the conserved residues for catalytic activity (G219GDEF) and an intact I-site (R210ESD), which allows c-di-GMP binding and allosteric feedback inhibition of DGC activity (Fig 3A; [44]). A mutant lacking DmxB neither aggregated on TPM agar nor in submerged culture and was strongly reduced in sporulation (S1 Fig and Fig 3B). MXAN2061, henceforth PmxA (PDE from M. xanthus A), is a predicted integral membrane protein and contains an N-terminal periplasmic Cache domain followed by a transmembrane segment, a HAMP domain and a HD-GYP domain with all the residues required for catalytic activity (H424D-G485YP) (Fig 3A; [44]). The ΔpmxA mutant formed highly irregular translucent fruiting bodies on TPM agar, did not aggregate in submerged culture (S1 Fig and Fig 3B) and only sporulated at 15% of WT levels (S1 Fig and Fig 3B). Moreover, the ΔdmxB ΔpmxA double mutant had the same developmental phenotype as the ΔdmxB strain (Fig 3B).
The developmental defects in all four mutants were complemented by ectopic expression of the relevant WT gene from its native promoter on plasmids integrated at the Mx8 attB site (Fig 3B and [15]). Because SgmT and TmoK are important for T4P-dependent motility, we speculate that the developmental defects caused by lack of either of these two proteins may be caused by a defect in T4P-dependent motility. From here on, we focused on DmxB and PmxA that are only important for development.
DmxB and PmxA have enzymatic activity and DmxB binds c-di-GMP in vitro
To test in vitro for enzymatic activity of DmxB and PmxA, we overexpressed His6-tagged full-length variants of DmxB and truncated variants of PmxA (Fig 4A and 4B) in Escherichia coli and purified them as soluble proteins.
Similarly to the control protein DgcAWT, DmxB produced c-di-GMP when incubated with [α-32P]-GTP as detected after separation of nucleotides by thin layer chromatography (TLC), while an active site variant DmxBD221A did not (Fig 4A). To test whether DmxB binds c-di-GMP in vitro we used a differential radial capillary action of ligand assay (DRaCALA) with [α-32P]-labeled c-di-GMP [48]. In agreement with the predictions from sequence analyses, DmxB specifically bound [α-32P]-c-di-GMP whereas the I-site mutant DmxBR210A did not (Fig 4C). Moreover, the I-site mutant had slightly increased DGC activity in vitro in comparison to the WT protein consistent with impaired feedback inhibition (Fig 4A). PmxA384-568, which contains the predicted cytoplasmic part of PmxA, displayed PDE activity and degraded [α-32P]-labeled c-di-GMP to linear pGpG, whereas the active site variant PmxAH424A, D425A did not (Fig 4B).
Lack of DmxB but not PmxA causes changes in the c-di-GMP level during starvation
To determine if lack of DmxB or PmxA had an effect on c-di-GMP levels in vivo, we determined the c-di-GMP level in the ΔdmxB and ΔpmxA mutants starved in suspension for 48 hrs. In the ΔpmxA mutant, the c-di-GMP level in vegetative cells as well as during starvation was similar to that in WT (Fig 5A). In the ΔdmxB mutant, the c-di-GMP level in vegetative cells was also similar to that in WT and essentially remained constant throughout the entire time course without showing the ~20-fold increase observed in WT (Fig 5A). Moreover, the ΔdmxB ΔpmxA double mutant accumulated c-di-GMP at a similar low level as the ΔdmxB mutant (Fig 5A) consistent with the observation that the double mutant has the same developmental phenotype as the ΔdmxB mutant. Because the ΔpmxA mutant did not show significant changes in c-di-GMP levels during development and the ΔdmxB ΔpmxA double mutant accumulated c-di-GMP at a similar low level as the ΔdmxB mutant, we focused on elucidating the function of DmxB in development.
In the ΔdmxB/dmxBWT complementation strain but not in the ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A strain containing the active site variant of DmxB, the c-di-GMP level during starvation was restored to that in WT (Fig 5A). Importantly, the ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A strain phenocopied the ΔdmxB mutant and did not aggregate and was strongly reduced in sporulation (Fig 3B). Moreover, development of the strain ΔdmxB/dmxBR210A, which contains the DmxB variant with a substitution of the conserved Arg residue in the I-site, proceeded as in WT. This strain had a c-di-GMP level that was ~4-fold higher than in WT at 24 hrs of starvation (Fig 5B—third panel, note scale on y-axis) consistent with the increased DGC activity in vitro (Fig 4A) and the notion that DmxBR210A is no longer subject to feedback inhibition by c-di-GMP. In all three complementation strains, the DmxB variants had accumulated at the same level at 24 hrs and this level was lower than in the DK1622 WT (Fig 3C; Cf. below). We conclude that complementation of the ΔdmxB mutant depends on DGC activity by DmxB and not only on its presence, that DmxB is responsible for the ~20-fold increase in the c-di-GMP level during development and that this increase is essential for development whereas an even higher increase in c-di-GMP levels does not interfere with development.
Because DmxB contains an N-terminal receiver domain with the conserved phosphorylatable Asp residue conserved (D60), we asked if DmxB phosphorylation is involved in regulating DmxB activity. To this end, we ectopically expressed dmxBD60N, which encodes a DmxB variant in which this Asp residue has been substituted with non-phosphorylatable Asn. DmxBD60N accumulated similarly to DmxBWT in the ΔdmxB/dmxBWT complementation strain (Fig 3C), complemented the developmental defects in the ΔdmxB mutant (Fig 3B) and largely restored c-di-GMP accumulation (Fig 5B). In vitro DmxBD60N displayed DGC activity similar to DmxBWT (Fig 4A). Altogether, these observations suggest that phosphorylation of the N-terminal receiver domain in DmxB is not essential for DmxB function. Of note, MXAN3734 located downstream of dmxB encodes a response regulator; however, under the conditions tested, this protein is not required for development (S3 Fig).
ΔdmxB mutant is partially complemented by expression of a heterologous DGC
Strains that accumulate significantly more c-di-GMP than WT (WT/DgcAWT and ΔdmxB/dmxBR210A) developed whereas the strains (WT/PA5295WT, ΔdmxB, and ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A) that accumulate significantly less c-di-GMP did not, suggesting that a minimal threshold level of c-di-GMP is essential for development and that significantly higher c-di-GMP levels do not interfere with development. Because DmxB is responsible for reaching this threshold, this raised the question if the only function of DmxB is to contribute to the cellular pool of c-di-GMP. To address this question, we expressed the heterologous DgcAWT or its active site variant DgcAD164A in the ΔdmxB mutant. Interestingly, fruiting body formation and sporulation were largely restored by expression of DgcAWT but not by DgcAD164A (Fig 3B) and in the DgcAWT containing strain the level of c-di-GMP was similar to that in WT at 24 hrs of starvation (Fig 5B) suggesting that the major function of DmxB is to contribute to a cellular pool of c-di-GMP in developing M. xanthus cells without engaging in specific protein-protein interactions.
DmxB specifically accumulates during development
To deduce how lack of DmxB only causes developmental defects and not a defect in T4P-dependent motility in growing cells, we determined the expression pattern of dmxB using qRT-PCR. The dmxB transcript level increased >100-fold during the first 24 hrs of development in comparison to growing cells (Fig 6A). Also, immunoblot analysis revealed that DmxB was undetectable in growing cells and that accumulation increased during development (Fig 6B). Together, these data demonstrate that DmxB accumulation is regulated at the transcriptional level and induced in response to starvation.
Lack of DmxB causes reduced EPS accumulation
In growing cells c-di-GMP is important for T4P-dependent motility by regulating T4P formation and EPS accumulation. To elucidate the mechanism underlying the developmental defects of the ΔdmxB mutant, we therefore tested this mutant for PilA accumulation and T4P formation. In WT cells as well as in the ΔdmxB mutant the level of PilA in total cell extracts increased from 0 to 24 hrs of development as previously reported for WT [50] (Fig 7A). Also, the level of PilA incorporated into T4P increased significantly in both strains and even more in the ΔdmxB mutant than in the WT (Fig 7A). As expected, PilA was not detected in the ΔpilA mutant and also not in T4P fraction of the pilC mutant that served as negative controls (Fig 7A).
EPS accumulation was determined using an assay in which trypan blue binding to EPS is used to visualize EPS. For this purpose, cells were inoculated on solid medium containing trypan blue in the presence or absence of nutrients. As expected, in the presence of nutrients, no differences in trypan blue staining were observed between WT, a fruA mutant, which has a developmental defect [51], the ΔdmxB mutant and the ΔdmxB mutant complemented with dmxBWT, dmxBD221A, dgcAWT or dgcAD164A whereas the difE mutant, which lacks the histidine protein kinase DifE of the Dif chemosensory system that is essential for EPS accumulation, did not stain with trypan blue (Fig 7B). By contrast, in the absence of nutrients, only the WT, ΔdmxB/dmxBWT and ΔdmxB/dgcAWT strains accumulated high levels of EPS as indicated by the dark blue coloration, while the ΔdmxB, ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A and ΔdmxB/dgcAD164A strains, similarly to the difE strain, bound trypan blue at a much reduced level (Fig 7B). Importantly, the development-deficient fruA mutant bound trypan blue similarly to WT providing evidence that the reduced EPS accumulation in the ΔdmxB, ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A and ΔdmxB/dgcAD164A strains was not a simple consequence of lack of development. Together, these data strongly indicate that an increase in the c-di-GMP level is required for EPS accumulation during development and that DmxB is responsible for this increase in WT.
Lack of DmxB causes non-cell autonomous developmental defects
The developmental defects of the ΔdmxB mutant are similar to those of the difE mutant, i.e. no aggregation, strongly reduced sporulation and strongly reduced EPS accumulation. Therefore, we hypothesized that difE would also be important for DmxB accumulation. As shown in Fig 6C, the difE mutant is strongly reduced in DmxB accumulation. Consistently, the difE mutant was found to be strongly reduced in c-di-GMP accumulation after 24 hrs of starvation (Fig 5B).
Because the developmental defects of a difE mutant can be rescued by extracellular complementation by WT in co-development assays, we reasoned that the ΔdmxB mutant would also be rescued by co-development with WT if the primary defect in this mutant is reduced EPS accumulation during development. To this end, cells of the tetracycline resistant ΔdmxB mutant (ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A) were mixed with tetracycline sensitive WT cells in a 1:1 ratio and co-developed in submerged culture. Subsequently, spores formed by the two strains were enumerated. In this experiment, 53% of germinating spores derived from the ΔdmxB/dmxBD221A strain (Fig 7C). Importantly, the ΔdmxB mutant was not rescued by co-development with the difE mutant and the ΔdmxB mutant did not rescue sporulation of the difE mutant whereas the WT efficiently rescued sporulation by the difE mutant, supporting the notion that the mechanism underlying the ΔdmxB developmental defects is indeed reduced EPS accumulation.
Dictyostelium discoideum is the only eukaryote where c-di-GMP has been identified and lack of the DGC DgcA blocks fruiting body formation [52]. Development of a dgcA mutant is restored by exogenous c-di-GMP at a final concentration of 1 mM. Therefore, we tested if exogenous c-di-GMP would restore development of the ΔdmxB mutant. Estimates of the intracellular concentration of c-di-GMP in different bacterial species range between 130 nM to a few μM [53, 54]. Therefore, we added exogenous c-di-GMP at 0 or 24 hrs to a final concentration of 1 mM to the ΔdmxB mutant in submerged culture. However, development of the mutant was not restored by exogenous c-di-GMP under these conditions.
Transcription of eps genes is reduced in the ΔdmxB mutant
The eps locus encodes proteins involved in EPS synthesis and transport and at least 10 of the genes in this locus are essential for development [41] (S4A Fig). We measured the expression profile in WT and the ΔdmxB mutant during development of ten of the eps genes, which encode proteins with different functions in EPS synthesis and transport using qRT-PCR (Fig 8 and S5AB Fig). For seven of the ten genes we did not observe significant differences in the expression profiles between the two strains (S4B Fig); however, three genes (epsA, epsB and epsD) were transcribed at a significantly lower level in the ΔdmxB mutant than in WT at the late time points (Fig 8). These three genes have been suggested to form a single transcriptional unit together with two additional genes [41] (S4A Fig). epsA and epsD encode predicted glycosyltransferases and have been shown to be essential for EPS accumulation and development while epsB encodes a predicted glycosyl hydrolase that is neither important for EPS accumulation nor for development [41].
These data suggest that the DmxB-dependent high level of c-di-GMP that accumulates during development functions to stimulate transcription of at least three genes in the eps locus. The only transcription regulator known to be required for EPS synthesis in M. xanthus is the NtrC-like transcriptional regulator EpsI/Nla24 [41–43], which is encoded in the eps locus (S4A Fig). Two NtrC-like transcriptional regulators have been shown to bind to c-di-GMP [22, 23], suggesting a possible route for c-di-GMP regulation of EPS synthesis via direct allosteric control of EpsI/Nla24. To test whether EpsI/Nla24 binds to c-di-GMP, we first used a biotinylated c-di-GMP pull-down experiment. As shown in Fig 9A, EpsI/Nla24-His6 was successfully pulled-down from E. coli whole-cell extracts containing overexpressed EpsI/Nla24-His6, strongly suggesting c-di-GMP binding. Direct c-di-GMP binding by EpsI/Nla24 was subsequently confirmed using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) with a chip containing biotinylated c-di-GMP bound to streptavidin, and the purified protein (Fig 9B) [55]. The KD of c-di-GMP binding to EpsI/Nla24 was calculated as 0.53 ±0.06 μM, well within the physiological range of published c-di-GMP binding proteins (Fig 9B) [56].
Discussion
Here, we show that c-di-GMP is an essential regulator of starvation-induced development with fruiting body formation and sporulation in M. xanthus. To assess c-di-GMP accumulation during starvation, M. xanthus cells were starved on a solid surface or in suspension. While starvation in suspension is not conducive to development, starvation on a solid surface is. Under both conditions, the c-di-GMP level increased significantly (~20-fold over 48 hrs). Because the level of c-di-GMP does not increase significantly in stationary phase M. xanthus cells [44], we conclude that the increase in the c-di-GMP level is a specific response to starvation and that the c-di-GMP level increases during development. In otherwise WT cells, further increasing the c-di-GMP level by expression of a heterologous DGC did not prevent progression of development whereas reducing the c-di-GMP level by expression of a heterologous PDE caused defects in fruiting body formation as well as in sporulation suggesting that a threshold level of c-di-GMP is essential for development to proceed to completion.
By systematically analyzing a set of mutants with single mutations in the 24 gene encoding proteins with a GGDEF, EAL or HD-GYP domain, we identified a single catalytically active DGC, DmxB, which is not only specifically required for development but also responsible for the increase in the c-di-GMP level during starvation. DGC activity by DmxB is essential for development. Moreover, the DmxB-dependent increase in the c-di-GMP level during development is necessary for EPS accumulation and our data suggests that the stimulation of EPS accumulation proceeds via stimulation of the transcription of a subset of the genes in the eps locus. This subset of genes code for predicted glycosyltransferases that have previously been shown to be important for EPS accumulation and development (EpsA, EpsD) and a glycosyl hydrolase (EpsB) that is neither important for EPS accumulation nor for development [41]. Also, the developmental defects caused by lack of DmxB are non-cell autonomous and development of the ΔdmxB mutant can be rescued by co-development with a strain proficient in EPS accumulation strongly suggesting that the defects in development in the ΔdmxB mutant are caused by lack of EPS. DmxB can be largely functionally replaced by a heterologous DGC both with respect to development and EPS accumulation. Because it is unlikely that this DGC would be able to engage in the same protein-protein interactions as DmxB, we infer that the increase in c-di-GMP level, rather than DmxB per se, is important for development and EPS accumulation. Finally, because all strains with significant increases in the level of c-di-GMP, irrespective of the DGC involved, develop whereas strains with reduced c-di-GMP levels have strong defects in development, we surmise that a minimal threshold level of c-di-GMP is essential for development to be successfully completed and that c-di-GMP levels in excess of this threshold do not interfere with development. In WT cells, this minimal threshold level of c-di-GMP is generated by DmxB. It should be noted that simply increasing the c-di-GMP level in vegetative cells to that observed during development by expression of a heterologous DGC is not sufficient to initiate fruiting body formation [44]. Thus, as opposed to the second messenger (p)ppGpp, which is required and sufficient for initiating the developmental program in M. xanthus [57, 58], the increased c-di-GMP level is necessary for development but not sufficient to initiate this program. In S. venezuelae c-di-GMP also regulates multicellular development with the formation of aerial hyphae. However, in this organism, a high level of c-di-GMP inhibits development by binding to the transcription factor BldD, which inhibits expression of sporulation genes, and a decrease in the c-di-GMP level stimulates development [5]. Thus, c-di-GMP has opposite effects on multicellular development in S. venezuelae and M. xanthus.
EPS synthesis is a target of c-di-GMP-dependent regulation in several bacterial species [for review, see [1]]. This regulation can occur at the transcriptional and post-translational level. Among transcription factors regulating the expression of genes for EPS synthesis, c-di-GMP has been shown to bind to and modulate the activity of the NtrC-like transcriptional regulators FleQ in P. aeruginosa [22] and VpsR in Vibrio cholerae [23] as well as the response regulator VpsT in V. cholerae [24]. FleQ alone inhibits transcription of the pel operon involved in EPS synthesis while binding of c-di-GMP to FleQ inhibits its binding to the pel promoter in that way causing derepression of pel transcription [22]. VpsR binds to its cognate promoters independently of c-di-GMP; however, it only functions as a transcriptional activator in the c-di-GMP bound state and it is currently not known how c-di-GMP modulates VpsR activity [23]. The NtrC-like transcriptional regulator EpsI/Nla24 is the only transcription regulator known to be required for EPS synthesis in M. xanthus and is composed of three domains, an N-terminal receiver domain of two component system, a AAA+ domain, and a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain (S5 Fig). As shown here, EpsI/Nla24 binds tightly to c-di-GMP, with a KD in the low μM range. This strongly suggests that regulation of EPS synthesis during development by c-di-GMP in M. xanthus proceeds through control of transcription factor activity, and hence eps transcription, by direct c-di-GMP binding to EpsI/Nla24. Recently, structural insights into how the AAA+ domain in FleQ from P. aeruginosa binds c-di-GMP were reported and several important motifs for c-di-GMP binding were identified [59] (S5 Fig). Alignment of the AAA+ domains of EpsI/Nla24 and FleQ revealed that not all of these motifs are present in EpsI/Nla24 but confirmed the presence of two Arg residues in EpsI/Nla24 (S5 Fig) that are important for c-di-GMP binding by FleQ [59]. Similarly, VpsR from V. cholera does not have all the binding residues reported for FleQ [59] but still binds c-di-GMP [23].
EpsI/Nla24 has been suggested to regulate eps gene transcription not only in developing cells but also during vegetative growth [43]. To explain the effect of lack of DmxB and by implication low c-di-GMP levels on eps gene expression during development, we suggest three scenarios. First, as the level of c-di-GMP in vegetative WT cells is similar to the c-di-GMP level in starving ΔdmxB cells, it is possible that EpsI/Nla24 binds c-di-GMP at this level in vegetative cells as well as in starving ΔdmxB cells. At this c-di-GMP level, EpsI/Nla24 in complex with c-di-GMP activates transcription of all the tested eps genes in vegetative cells and a subset of the tested eps genes in developing cells; however, a higher level of c-di-GMP is required for epsABD expression during development. Alternatively, EpsI/Nla24 functions independently of c-di-GMP in vegetative cells and only binds c-di-GMP during development and this binding requires the high concentration of c-di-GMP that is observed in starving WT cells. In this scenario, EpsI/Nla24 in complex with c-di-GMP specifically functions to activate epsABD expression. Of note, c-di-GMP modulates FleQ activity at different promoters differentially [60]. In a third scenario, an additional transcriptional regulator could be involved in the response to the high c-di-GMP level during development. In future experiments, the molecular mechanism of EpsI/Nla24 in the expression of eps genes will be analyzed.
Several lines of evidence suggest that synthesis and activity of DmxB is tightly regulated. First, DmxB only accumulates in starving cells but not in growing cells. Measurements of dmxB transcript levels strongly suggest that DmxB accumulation is regulated at the transcriptional level. DmxB consists of an N-terminal receiver domain and the C-terminal catalytically active GGDEF domain. An active DGC is an obligate dimer [8] and it was previously reported that DGCs can be induced to dimerize by phosphorylation of their receiver domain as in the case of PleD and WspR [61, 62]. However, the non-phosphorylatable variant DmxBD60N was fully functional in vivo as well as in vitro suggesting that DmxB forms a dimer independently of phosphorylation of the N-terminal receiver domain. Second, a DmxB variant with a mutated I-site showed higher activity in vitro and accumulated ~4-fold more c-di-GMP than WT during development suggesting that DmxB is subject to allosteric feedback inhibition of DGC activity by c-di-GMP. The DmxB variant with the mutated I-site developed normally, suggesting that allosteric feedback inhibition of DGC activity by DmxB is not essential. We speculate that this feedback serves to minimize futile c-di-GMP synthesis during starvation. In total, these observations suggest that DmxB is regulated at the transcriptional level as well as post-translationally by allosteric feedback inhibition.
The Dif chemosensory system is essential for EPS synthesis in growing as well as in starving cells [40], however, it is not known how the Dif system stimulates EPS synthesis. Here, we show that the DifE histidine protein kinase is essential for DmxB accumulation and c-di-GMP accumulation during development, strongly suggesting that during development the Dif system functions by stimulating DmxB accumulation and in that way c-di-GMP and EPS synthesis. Because DmxB specifically accumulates during development and does not accumulate in growing cells, these data also argue that Dif functions through a different downstream target in growing cells to stimulate EPS synthesis.
In addition to DmxB, we also identified the enzymatically active PDE PmxA as specifically important for development. Interestingly, the ΔpmxA mutant did not show significant changes in the c-di-GMP levels during development suggesting that the developmental defects in the ΔpmxA mutant are not a simple consequence of changes in the global cellular c-di-GMP level but may involve protein-protein interaction and possibly also a local c-di-GMP pool. Interestingly, the HD-GYP domain protein RpfG from Xanthomonas campestris was found to interact directly with several GGDEF domain proteins. This interaction was independent on PDE activity of RpfG and DGC activity of the GGDEF domain proteins [63, 64]. It remains to be shown if PDE activity is essential for PmxA function in vivo and if PmxA interacts with other proteins involved in c-di-GMP metabolism in M. xanthus.
Proteins involved in c-di-GMP metabolism and regulation are ubiquitous with some species encoding >100 proteins with GGDEF, EAL, HD-GYP and effector domains [1]. Yet, mutation of individual genes can give rise to specific defects raising the question how these enzymes and effectors are regulated to obtain specific output responses. It has been suggested that individual signaling modules can be temporally separated by differentially regulating their synthesis, spatially separated by complex formation or by localizing to distinct subcellular locations, or by effectors having different binding affinities for c-di-GMP [1, 53, 54, 65]. Among the 17 GGDEF domain proteins in M. xanthus, 11 are predicted to have DGC activity [44]. We previously showed that DmxA has DGC activity and is involved in regulating EPS accumulation in growing M. xanthus cells. Lack of DmxA causes a slight but significant increase in the c-di-GMP level and a ~4-fold increase in EPS accumulation and in that way also cause a defect in T4P-dependent motility [44]. However, lack of DmxA does not cause developmental defects. Vice versa, lack of DmxB only causes developmental defects and not motility defects in growing cells. The finding here that DmxB is exclusively synthesized in developing cells provides evidence that M. xanthus restricts the synthesis of at least one DGC to a distinct stage of its life cycle suggesting that temporal regulation of proteins involved in c-di-GMP metabolism could be of general importance in M. xanthus. Similarly, it was recently demonstrated that Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus uses different DGCs at different stages of its predatory life cycle [66].
Materials and Methods
M. xanthus strains, growth and development
All M. xanthus strains are derivatives of the WT strain DK1622 [67]. M. xanthus strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. M. xanthus cells were grown in liquid 1% CTT medium or on 1% CTT agar plates at 32°C [68]. For development, cells were grown as described, harvested and resuspended in MC7 buffer (10 mM MOPS pH 7.0, 1 mM CaCl2) to a calculated density of 7 × 109 cells/ml. 20 μl aliquots of cells were placed on TPM agar (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 1 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 pH 7.6, 8 mM MgSO4); for development in submerged culture, 50 μl of the cell suspension were mixed with 350 μl MC7 buffer and placed in a 18 mm diameter microtiter dish. Cells were visualized at the indicated time points using a Leica MZ8 stereomicroscope or a Leica IMB/E inverted microscope and imaged using Leica DFC280 and DFC350FX CCD cameras, respectively. Sporulation levels were determined after development for 120 hrs in submerged culture as the number of sonication- and heat-resistant spores relative to WT [51]. In extracellular complementation experiments, spore titers were determined as the number of germinating spores relative to WT. Spores of mixed strains were enumerated by replica plating onto plates containing relevant antibiotics. Because the results of sporulation assay are highly variable, we considered it as significant only if the difference between strains were 3-fold or more. Kanamycin and oxytetracycline were added to M. xanthus cells at concentrations of 40 μg/ml or 10 μg/ml, respectively. Growth was measured as an increase in OD at 550 nm.
Table 1. M. xanthus strains used in this work.
M. xanthus strains | Genotype a, b | Reference |
---|---|---|
DK1622 | Wild-type | [67] |
DK1300 | pilC | [35] |
SA3502 | ΔsgmT | [15] |
SW501 | difE::kanR | [75] |
DK10410 | ΔpilA | [76] |
DK11063 | fruA::Tn5 lacΩ7540; kanR | [51] |
SA3535 | attB::pTP110; (PpilA-PA5295WT-strepII) | [44] |
SA3537 | attB::pTP112; (PpilA-PA5295E328A-strepII) | [44] |
SA3543 | attB::pTP114; (PpilA-dgcAWT-strepII) | [44] |
SA3559 | attB::pTP131; (PpilA-dgcAD164A-strepII) | [44] |
SA3524 | ΔMXAN2424 (5–256/275) | [44] |
SA3525 | ΔMXAN2530 (11-406/416) | [44] |
SA3544 | ΔMXAN4232 (6–407/412) | [44] |
SA3546 | ΔpmxA (16–559/569) | [44] |
SA3554 | ΔtmoK (11–1101/1110) | [44] |
SA3533 | ΔMXAN5791 (11–338/348) | [44] |
SA3545 | ΔMXAN5199 (6–297/304) | [44] |
SA3548 | ΔMXAN4675 (11–352/372) | [44] |
SA3555 | ΔMXAN1525 (6–289/294) | [44] |
SA3556 | ΔMXAN2643 (11–355/265) | [44] |
SA3557 | ΔMXAN4029 (6–286/292) | [44] |
SA3558 | ΔMXAN2807 (6–655/661) | [44] |
SA3569 | ΔMXAN4257 (6–589/595) | [44] |
SA3599 | ΔactA (11-292/302) | [44] |
SA5524 | ΔMXAN2997 (9–641/646) | [44] |
SA5600 | ΔMXAN4463 (46–433/458) | [44] |
SA5605 | ΔdmxB (10–310/319) | [44] |
SA5606 | ΔMXAN7362 (10–665/674) | [44] |
SA5607 | ΔMXAN5366 (10–312/321) | [44] |
SA5525 | ΔMXAN5340 (50–542/547) | [44] |
SA5526 | ΔMXAN5053 (6–612/617) | [44] |
SA5527 | ΔMXAN6098 (6–495/501) | [44] |
SA5619 | ΔdmxB; attB::pDJS27 (Pnat-dmxBWT) | This study |
SA5620 | ΔdmxB; attB::pDJS37 (Pnat-dmxBD221A) | This study |
SA5621 | ΔdmxB; attB::pDJS33 (Pnat-dmxBD60N) | This study |
SA5622 | ΔdmxB; attB::pDJS38 (Pnat-dmxBR210A) | This study |
SA5636 | ΔdmxB; attB::pTP114 (PpilA-dgcAWT-strepII) | This study |
SA5637 | ΔdmxB; attB::pTP131 (PpilA-dgcAD164A-strepII) | This study |
SA5629 | ΔpmxA; attB::pDJS56 (Pnat-pmxAWT) | This study |
SA5630 | ΔtmoK; attB::pDJS57 (Pnat-tmoKWT) | This study |
a For in-frame deletions, numbers in brackets indicate the codons deleted over the total number of codons in a given gene).
b For strains containing plasmids integrated at the Mx8 attB site, the gene expressed including the promoter driving the expression is indicated in brackets.
Table 2. Plasmids used in this work.
Plasmids | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|
pBJ114 | kanR, galK | [77] |
pSWU30 | tetR | [50] |
pSW105 | PpilA, kanR | [78] |
pET24b(+) | kanR, expression vector | Novagen |
pMALc2x | ampR, expression vector | New England Biolabs |
pDJS27 | pSWU30; Pnat-dmxBWT; tetR | This study |
pDJS37 | pSWU30; Pnat-dmxBD221A; tetR | This study |
pDJS33 | pSWU30; Pnat-dmxBD60N; tetR | This study |
pDJS38 | pSWU30; Pnat-dmxBR210A; tetR | This study |
pDJS56 | pSWU30; Pnat-pmxA; tetR | This study |
pDJS57 | pSWU30; Pnat-tmoK; tetR | This study |
pDJS31 | pET24b(+); dgcAWT; kanR | [44] |
pDJS30 | pET24b(+); dmxBWT; kanR | This study |
pDJS39 | pET24b(+); dmxBD221A; kanR | This study |
pDJS42 | pET24b(+); dmxBR210A; kanR | This study |
pDJS45 | pET24b(+); dmxBD60N; kanR | This study |
pDJS71 | pET24b(+); pmxA384-568; kanR | This study |
pDJS75 | pET24b(+); pmxA384-568 H424A, D425A; kanR | This study |
pDJS79 | pET24b(+); epsI/nla24; kanR | This study |
pTP114 | pSW105, PpilA-dgcAWT-strepII, kanR | [44] |
pTP131 | pSW105, PpilA-dgcAD164A-strepII, kanR | [44] |
E. coli strains were grown in LB broth in the presence of relevant antibiotics [69]. All plasmids were propagated in E. coli Mach1 (ΔrecA1398 endA1 tonA Φ80ΔlacM15 ΔlacX74 hsdR(rK- mK+)) unless otherwise stated.
Trypan blue binding assay
Cells were grown in CTT to a density of 7 × 108 cells/ml, harvested and resuspended in 1% CTT or MC7 buffer to a calculated density of 7 × 109 cells/ml. 20 μl aliquots of the cell suspensions were placed on 0.5% agar supplemented with 0.5% CTT and 20 μg/ml trypan blue or on TPM agar supplemented 20 μg/ml trypan blue. Plates were incubated at 32°C for 24 hrs and then visualized using a Leica MZ8 stereomicroscope and imaged using Leica DFC280 camera.
c-di-GMP quantification
Quantifications of c-di-GMP levels in starving M. xanthus cells were performed as described [45]. Briefly, exponentially growing cells were harvested from CTT growth medium and resuspended to a cell density of 109 cells/ml in MC7 (10 mM MOPS pH 7.0, 1 mM CaCl2) starvation buffer, and incubated in submerged culture on a solid surface or in suspension with shaking. At the indicated time points, cells were harvested at 4°C, 2500× g, 20 min. Cells were lysed in extraction buffer (HPLC grade acetonitrile/methanol/water (2/2/1, v/v/v)), supernatants pooled and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum centrifuge. Pellets were dissolved in HPLC grade water for analysis by LC-MS/MS. All experiments were done in biological triplicates. For all samples, protein concentrations were determined in parallel using a Bradford assay (Bio-Rad).
qRT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was isolated from cells developed in submerged culture using a hot-phenol extraction method as described [70]. RNA was treated with DNase I (Ambion) and purified with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). RNA was confirmed to be free of DNA by PCR analysis. 1 μg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA with the High capacity cDNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems) using random hexamers primers. qRT-PCR was performed in 25 μl reaction volume using SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) and 0.1 μM primers specific to the target gene in a 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the comparative Ct method. All experiments were done with two biological replicates each with three technical replicates.
Immunoblot analysis
Immunoblots were carried out as described [69]. Rabbit polyclonal α-PilA [50], α-PilC [71] and α-DmxB antibodies were used together with horseradish-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma) as secondary antibody. Blots were developed using Luminata crescendo Western HRP Substrate (Millipore). T4P were sheared from cells developed in submerged culture, purified, followed by immunoblot analyses with α-PilA antibodies as described [50]. To generate rabbit, polyclonal α-DmxB antibodies, purified DmxB-His6 was used to immunize rabbits using standard procedures [69].
Protein purification
For expression and purification of His6-tagged proteins, proteins were expressed in E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3) (F- ompT hsdSB(rB- mB-) gal dcm (DE3) pRARE2) at 18°C or 37°C. His6-tagged proteins were purified using Ni-NTA affinity purification. Briefly, cells were resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, pH 8) and lysed using a French pressure cell. To purify DmxB variants and PmxA, after centrifugation (1 hr, 48000× g, 4°C) lysates were loaded on a Ni-NTA agarose column (Qiagen) and washed with 20x column volume using buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 8). Proteins were eluted with buffer C (50 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 200 mM imidazole, pH 8). To purify EpsI/Nla24, 1 ml HiTrap chelating HP columns (GE Healthcare, Life Sciences) were equilibrated with 10 volumes of washing buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2.5% (v/v) glycerol pH 6.8) and loaded with cell lysate. Following protein immobilization, the column was washed with 10 volumes of washing buffer containing 50mM imidazole, before proteins were eluted using washing buffer containing 500mM imidazole.
In vitro DGC and PDE assays
DGC and PDE activities were determined as described [72, 73]. Briefly, assays were performed with 10 μM of purified proteins (final concentration) in a final volume of 40 μl. Reaction mixtures were pre-incubated for 5 min at 30°C in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2). DGC reactions were initiated by adding 1 mM GTP/[α-32P]-GTP (0.1 μCi/μl) and incubated at 30°C for the indicated periods of time. PDE reactions were initiated by adding 32P-labeled c-di-GMP. Reactions were stopped by addition of one volume 0.5 M EDTA. Reaction products were analyzed by polyethyleneimine-cellulose TLC chromatography as described [12]. Plates were dried prior to exposing a phosphor-imaging screen (Molecular Dynamics). Data were collected and analyzed using a STORM 840 scanner (Amersham Biosciences) and ImageJ 1.46r, respectively.
Preparation of [α-32P]-labeled c-di-GMP
[α-32P]-labeled c-di-GMP was prepared by incubating 10 μM His6-DgcAWT (final concentration) with 1 mM GTP/[α-32P]-GTP (0.1 μCi/μl) in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2) in a total volume of 200 μl overnight at 30°C. The reaction mixture was then incubated with 5 units of calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (Fermentas) for 1 hr at 22°C to hydrolyze unreacted GTP. The reaction was stopped by incubation for 10 min at 95°C. The reaction was centrifuged (10 min, 15000× g, 20°C) and the supernatant used for the PDE assay.
In vitro c-di-GMP binding assay
In the DRaCALA [48, 74] [α-32P]-c-di-GMP was mixed with 20 μM of the relevant protein and incubated for 10 min at 22°C in binding buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2). 10 μl of this mixture was transferred to a nitrocellulose filter (GE Healthcare), allowed to dry and imaged using a STORM 840 scanner (Amersham Biosciences). For competition experiments, 0.4 mM unlabelled c-di-GMP (Biolog) or GTP (Sigma) was used. In the SPR-based method [55], experiments were done at 25°C with a Biacore T200 system (GE Healthcare) using a Streptavidin SA sensor chip (GE Healthcare), which has four flow cells each containing Streptavidin pre-immobilized to a carboxymethylated dextran matrix. Flow cell (FC) one (FC1) and FC3 were kept blank to use for reference subtraction. To remove unconjugated Streptavidin, the chip was washed three times with 1 M NaCl, 50 mM NaOH. 100 nM biotinylated c-di-GMP (BioLog) was immobilised on FC2 and FC4 of the Streptavidin SA chip at a 50 RU immobilisation level with a flow rate of 5 μl/min. Purified, soluble EpsI/Nla24-His6 was prepared in SPR buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.8). Samples were injected with a flow rate of 5 μl/min over the four flow cells for 90 sec followed by buffer flow for 60 sec. The chip was washed at the end of each cycle with 1 M NaCl. An increasing range of protein concentrations (62.5 nM, 125 nM, 250 nM, 500 nM, 1.0 μM, 2.0 μM, 4.0 μM) was used, with replicates for certain protein concentrations as appropriate. Sensorgrams were analysed using Biacore T200 BiaEvaluation version 1.0 (GE Healthcare). Data were plotted using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism. The experiment was repeated three times independently.
Biotinylated c-di-GMP pull-down
E. coli whole cell lysates before and after induction (0.5mM IPTG for 5 hrs at 28°C) of EpsI/ Nla24 were prepared by sonication. The lysed cells were centrifuged (1 hr, 13000× g, 4°C) and 45 μl of the soluble fraction was collected and mixed with biotinylated c-di-GMP (BioLog B098) at a final concentration of 30 μM. The mixture was incubated O/N on a rotary wheel at 8°C. The next day, UV cross-linking was carried out using a UV Stratalinker (Stratagene) for 4 min on ice, to stabilise c-di-GMP/protein complexes. 25μl of Streptavidin magnetic beads (Invitrogen) were added to the mixture, and incubated for 1 hr on a rotary wheel at 8°C. A magnet was used to isolate the Streptavidin magnetic beads and five washing steps were carried out using 200 μl of the protein wash buffer each time (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2.5% (v/v) glycerol pH 6.8), to remove non-bound proteins. The washed Streptavidin beads were resuspended in 15 μl wash buffer, 4× SDS loading buffer was added, incubated at 95°C for 10 min and then loaded on a 12% SDS-PAGE protein gel. The gel was then developed using InstantBlue (Expedeon).
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Annette Garbe for technical assistance in performing the c-di-GMP quantifications.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by: German Research Council within the framework of the Collaborative Research Center SFB987 “Microbial Diversity in Environmental Signal Response” (www.dfg.de/en/): to LSA; Max Planck Society (http://www.mpg.de/en): to LSA; and National Science Foundation grant MCB-1024989 (http://www.nsf.gov/): to MS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013; 77: 1–52. 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krasteva PV, Giglio KM, Sondermann H. Sensing the messenger: The diverse ways that bacteria signal through c-di-GMP. Protein Sci. 2012; 21: 929–948. 10.1002/pro.2093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boyd CD, O'Toole GA. Second messenger regulation of biofilm formation: Breakthroughs in understanding c-di-GMP effector systems. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2012; 28: 439–462. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Neunuebel MR, Golden JW. The Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 gene all2874 encodes a diguanylate cyclase and is required for normal heterocyst development under high-light growth conditions. J Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 6829–6836. 10.1128/JB.00701-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tschowri N, Schumacher MA, Schlimpert S, Chinnam NB, Findlay KC, Brennan RG, et al. Tetrameric c-di-GMP mediates effective transcription factor dimerization to control Streptomyces development. Cell. 2014; 158: 1136–1147. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Paul R, Weiser S, Amiot NC, Chan C, Schirmer T, Giese B, et al. Cell cycle-dependent dynamic localization of a bacterial response regulator with a novel di-guanylate cyclase output domain. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 715–727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ryjenkov DA, Tarutina M, Moskvin OV, Gomelsky M. Cyclic diguanylate is a ubiquitous signaling molecule in bacteria: Insights into biochemistry of the GGDEF protein domain. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 1792–1798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schirmer T, Jenal U. Structural and mechanistic determinants of c-di-GMP signalling. Nat Rev Micro. 2009; 7: 724–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schmidt AJ, Ryjenkov DA, Gomelsky M. The ubiquitous protein domain EAL is a cyclic diguanylate-specific phosphodiesterase: Enzymatically active and inactive EAL domains. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 4774–4781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tamayo R, Tischler AD, Camilli A. The EAL domain protein VieA is a cyclic diguanylate phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 33324–33330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ryan RP, Fouhy Y, Lucey JF, Crossman LC, Spiro S, He Y-W, et al. Cell–cell signaling in Xanthomonas campestris involves an HD-GYP domain protein that functions in cyclic di-GMP turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 6712–6717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 12.Christen M, Christen B, Folcher M, Schauerte A, Jenal U. Identification and characterization of a cyclic di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterase and its allosteric control by GTP. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 30829–30837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steiner S, Lori C, Böhm A, Jenal U. Allosteric activation of exopolysaccharide synthesis through cyclic di-GMP-stimulated protein-protein interaction. EMBO J. 2013; 32: 354–368. 10.1038/emboj.2012.315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Duerig A, Abel S, Folcher M, Nicollier M, Schwede T, Amiot N, et al. Second messenger-mediated spatiotemporal control of protein degradation regulates bacterial cell cycle progression. Genes Dev. 2009; 23: 93–104. 10.1101/gad.502409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Petters T, Zhang X, Nesper J, Treuner-Lange A, Gomez-Santos N, Hoppert M, et al. The orphan histidine protein kinase SgmT is a c-di-GMP receptor and regulates composition of the extracellular matrix together with the orphan DNA binding response regulator DigR in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol. 2012; 84: 147–165. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08015.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qi Y, Chuah MLC, Dong X, Xie K, Luo Z, Tang K, et al. Binding of cyclic diguanylate in the non-catalytic EAL domain of FimX induces a long-range conformational change. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286: 2910–2917. 10.1074/jbc.M110.196220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Newell PD, Monds RD, O'Toole GA. LapD is a bis-(3',5')-cyclic dimeric GMP-binding protein that regulates surface attachment by Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 3461–3466. 10.1073/pnas.0808933106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Navarro MV, De N, Bae N, Wang Q, Sondermann H. Structural analysis of the GGDEF-EAL domain-containing c-di-GMP receptor FimX. Structure. 2009; 17: 1104–1116. 10.1016/j.str.2009.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li W, He ZG. LtmA, a novel cyclic di-GMP-responsive activator, broadly regulates the expression of lipid transport and metabolism genes in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Nucl Acids Res. 2012; 40: 11292–11307. 10.1093/nar/gks923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chin KH, Lee YC, Tu ZL, Chen CH, Tseng YH, Yang JM, et al. The cAMP receptor-like protein CLP is a novel c-di-GMP receptor linking cell-cell signaling to virulence gene expression in Xanthomonas campestris. J Mol Biol 2010; 396: 646–662. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fazli M, O’Connell A, Nilsson M, Niehaus K, Dow JM, Givskov M, et al. The CRP/FNR family protein Bcam1349 is a c-di-GMP effector that regulates biofilm formation in the respiratory pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia. Mol Microbiol. 2011; 82: 327–341. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07814.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hickman JW, Harwood CS. Identification of FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a c-di-GMP-responsive transcription factor. Mol Microbiol. 2008; 69: 376–389. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06281.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Srivastava D, Harris RC, Waters CM. Integration of cyclic di-GMP and quorum sensing in the control of vpsT and aphA in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 2011; 193: 6331–6341. 10.1128/JB.05167-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krasteva PV, Fong JC, Shikuma NJ, Beyhan S, Navarro MV, Yildiz FH, et al. Vibrio cholerae VpsT regulates matrix production and motility by directly sensing cyclic di-GMP. Science. 2010; 327: 866–868. 10.1126/science.1181185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Amikam D, Galperin MY. PilZ domain is part of the bacterial c-di-GMP binding protein. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22: 3–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ryjenkov DA, Simm R, Römling U, Gomelsky M. The PilZ domain is a receptor for the second messenger c-di-GMP: The PilZ domain protein YcgR controls motility in enterobacteria. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 30310–30314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Christen M, Christen B, Allan MG, Folcher M, Jeno P, Grzesiek S, et al. DgrA is a member of a new family of cyclic diguanosine monophosphate receptors and controls flagellar motor function in Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 4112–4117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pratt JT, Tamayo R, Tischler AD, Camilli A. PilZ domain proteins bind cyclic diguanylate and regulate diverse processes in Vibrio cholerae. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 12860–12870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ramelot TA, Yee A, Cort JR, Semesi A, Arrowsmith CH, Kennedy MA. NMR structure and binding studies confirm that PA4608 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a PilZ domain and a c-di-GMP binding protein. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2007; 66: 266–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Merighi M, Lee VT, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Lory S. The second messenger bis-(3'-5')-cyclic-GMP and its PilZ domain-containing receptor Alg44 are required for alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2007; 65: 876–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wilksch JJ, Yang J, Clements A, Gabbe JL, Short KR, Cao H, et al. MrkH, a novel c-di-GMP-dependent transcriptional activator, controls Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation by regulating type 3 fimbriae expression. PLoS Pathog. 2011; 7: e1002204 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sudarsan N, Lee ER, Weinberg Z, Moy RH, Kim JN, Link KH, et al. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Science. 2008; 321: 411–413. 10.1126/science.1159519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Konovalova A, Petters T, Søgaard-Andersen L. Extracellular biology of Myxococcus xanthus. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010; 34: 89–106. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00194.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jelsbak L, Søgaard-Andersen L. Pattern formation by a cell surface-associated morphogen in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 2032–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hodgkin J, Kaiser D. Genetics of gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus (Myxobacterales): Two gene systems control movement. Mol Gen Genet. 1979; 171: 177–191. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu SS, Wu J, Cheng YL, Kaiser D. The pilH gene encodes an ABC transporter homologue required for type IV pilus biogenesis and social gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol. 1998; 29: 1249–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li Y, Sun H, Ma X, Lu A, Lux R, Zusman D, et al. Extracellular polysaccharides mediate pilus retraction during social motility of Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 5443–5448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chang BY, Dworkin M. Isolated fibrils rescue cohesion and development in the Dsp mutant of Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol. 1994; 176: 7190–7196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shimkets LJ. Role of cell cohesion in Myxococcus xanthus fruiting body formation. J Bacteriol. 1986; 166: 842–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang Z, Ma X, Tong L, Kaplan HB, Shimkets LJ, Shi W. Myxococcus xanthus dif genes are required for biogenesis of cell surface fibrils essential for social gliding motility. J Bacteriol. 2000; 182: 5793–5798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu A, Cho K, Black WP, Duan XY, Lux R, Yang Z, et al. Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes required for social motility in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol. 2005; 55: 206–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Caberoy NB, Welch RD, Jakobsen JS, Slater SC, Garza AG. Global mutational analysis of NtrC-like activators in Myxococcus xanthus: identifying activator mutants defective for motility and fruiting body development. J Bacteriol. 2003; 185: 6083–6094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lancero H, Caberoy NB, Castaneda S, Li YN, Lu A, Dutton D, et al. Characterization of a Myxococcus xanthus mutant that is defective for adventurous motility and social motility. Microbiology-Sgm. 2004; 150: 4085–4093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Skotnicka D, Petters T, Heering J, Hoppert M, Kaever V, Søgaard-Andersen L. c-di-GMP regulates type IV pili-dependent-motility in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol. 2016; 198: 77–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Spangler C, Bohm A, Jenal U, Seifert R, Kaever V. A liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry method for quantitation of cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate. J Microbiol Methods. 2010; 81: 226–231. 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gronewold TM, Kaiser D. The act operon controls the level and time of C-signal production for Myxococcus xanthus development. Mol Microbiol. 2001; 40: 744–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43: D257–D260. 10.1093/nar/gku949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Roelofs KG, Wang JX, Sintim HO, Lee VT. Differential radial capillary action of ligand assay for high-throughput detection of protein-metabolite interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 15528–15533. 10.1073/pnas.1018949108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bharati BK, Sharma IM, Kasetty S, Kumar M, Mukherjee R, Chatterji D. A full-length bifunctional protein involved in c-di-GMP turnover is required for long-term survival under nutrient starvation in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Microbiology. 2012; 158: 1415–1427. 10.1099/mic.0.053892-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu SS, Kaiser D. Regulation of expression of the pilA gene in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179: 7748–7758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Søgaard-Andersen L, Slack FJ, Kimsey H, Kaiser D. Intercellular C-signaling in Myxococcus xanthus involves a branched signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev. 1996; 10: 740–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen ZH, Schaap P. The prokaryote messenger c-di-GMP triggers stalk cell differentiation in Dictyostelium. Nature. 2012; 488: 680–683. 10.1038/nature11313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Massie JP, Reynolds EL, Koestler BJ, Cong J-P, Agostoni M, Waters CM. Quantification of high-specificity cyclic diguanylate signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 12746–12751. 10.1073/pnas.1115663109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Abel S, Bucher T, Nicollier M, Hug I, Kaever V, Abel zur Wiesch P, et al. Bi-modal distribution of the second messenger c-di-GMP controls cell fate and asymmetry during the Caulobacter cell cycle. PLOS Genet. 2013; 9: e1003744 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Trampari E, Stevenson CEM, Little RH, Wilhelm T, Lawson DM, Malone JG. Bacterial rotary export ATPases are allosterically regulated by the nucleotide second messenger cyclic-di-GMP. J Biol Chem. 2015; 290: 24470–24483. 10.1074/jbc.M115.661439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pultz IS, Christen M, Kulasekara HD, Kennard A, Kulasekara B, Miller SI. The response threshold of Salmonella PilZ domain proteins is determined by their binding affinities for c-di-GMP. Mol Microbiol. 2012; 86: 1424–1440. 10.1111/mmi.12066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harris BZ, Kaiser D, Singer M. The guanosine nucleotide (p)ppGpp initiates development and A-factor production in Myxococcus xanthus. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 1022–1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Singer M, Kaiser D. Ectopic production of guanosine penta- and teraphosphate can initiate early developmental gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus. Genes Dev. 1995; 9: 1633–1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Matsuyama BY, Krasteva PV, Baraquet C, Harwood CS, Sondermann H, Navarro MVAS. Mechanistic insights into c-di-GMP-dependent control of the biofilm regulator FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad sci USA. 2016; 113: E209–E218. 10.1073/pnas.1523148113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baraquet C, Harwood CS. Cyclic diguanosine monophosphate represses bacterial flagella synthesis by interacting with the Walker A motif of the enhancer-binding protein FleQ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 18478–18483. 10.1073/pnas.1318972110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Paul R, Abel S, Wassmann P, Beck A, Heerklotz H, Jenal U. Activation of the diguanylate cyclase PleD by phosphorylation-mediated dimerization. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 29170–29177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hickman JW, Tifrea DF, Harwood CS. A chemosensory system that regulates biofilm formation through modulation of cyclic diguanylate levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 14422–14427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ryan RP, McCarthy Y, Andrade M, Farah CS, Armitage JP, Dow JM. Cell–cell signal-dependent dynamic interactions between HD-GYP and GGDEF domain proteins mediate virulence in Xanthomonas campestris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 5989–5994. 10.1073/pnas.0912839107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ryan RP, McCarthy Y, Kiely PA, O'Connor R, Farah CS, Armitage JP, et al. Dynamic complex formation between HD-GYP, GGDEF and PilZ domain proteins regulates motility in Xanthomonas campestris. Mol Microbiol. 2012; 86: 557–567. 10.1111/mmi.12000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hengge R. Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009; 7: 263–273. 10.1038/nrmicro2109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hobley L, Fung RK, Lambert C, Harris MA, Dabhi JM, King SS, et al. Discrete cyclic di-GMP-dependent control of bacterial predation versus axenic growth in Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. PLOS Pathog. 2012; 8: e1002493 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kaiser D. Social gliding is correlated with the presence of pili in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979; 76: 5952–5956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hodgkin J, Kaiser D. Cell-to-cell stimulation of movement in nonmotile mutants of Myxococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977; 74: 2938–2942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual. 3rd Edition ed. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Overgaard M, Wegener-Feldbrügge S, Søgaard-Andersen L. The orphan response regulator DigR is required for synthesis of extracellular matrix fibrils in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188: 4384–4394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bulyha I, Schmidt C, Lenz P, Jakovljevic V, Höne A, Maier B, et al. Regulation of the type IV pili molecular machine by dynamic localization of two motor proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 74: 691–706. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06891.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bordeleau E, Brouillette E, Robichaud N, Burrus V. Beyond antibiotic resistance: integrating conjugative elements of the SXT/R391 family that encode novel diguanylate cyclases participate to c-di-GMP signalling in Vibrio cholerae. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12: 510–523. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02094.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sultan SZ, Pitzer JE, Boquoi T, Hobbs G, Miller MR, Motaleb MA. Analysis of the HD-GYP domain cyclic dimeric GMP phosphodiesterase reveals a role in motility and the enzootic life cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2011; 79: 3273–3283. 10.1128/IAI.05153-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fang X, Ahmad I, Blanka A, Schottkowski M, Cimdins A, Galperin MY, et al. GIL, a new c-di-GMP-binding protein domain involved in regulation of cellulose synthesis in enterobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2014; 93: 439–452. 10.1111/mmi.12672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yang ZM, Geng YZ, Xu D, Kaplan HB, Shi WY. A new set of chemotaxis homologues is essential for Myxococcus xanthus social motility. Mol Microbiol. 1998; 30: 1123–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wu SS, Kaiser D. Markerless deletions of pil genes in Myxococcus xanthus generated by counterselection with the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178: 5817–5821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Julien B, Kaiser AD, Garza A. Spatial control of cell differentiation in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 9098–9103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jakovljevic V, Leonardy S, Hoppert M, Søgaard-Andersen L. PilB and PilT are ATPases acting antagonistically in type IV pilus function in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 2411–2421. 10.1128/JB.01793-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.