Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports
. 2016 May 22;9:39–41. doi: 10.4137/CCRep.S39139

Posterior Epidural Migration of a Sequestrated Lumbar Disk Fragment Causing Cauda Equina Syndrome in an Old Patient: A Case Report

Kaveh Haddadi 1,, Hamid Reza Ganjeh Qazvini 2
PMCID: PMC4877079  PMID: 27257401

Abstract

Disk fragment relocation is commonly limited to the anterior epidural space, although posterior epidural movement of a sequestrated disk piece to the posterior epidural space is infrequent. We present an uncommon case of dorsal extradural sequestration of lumbar disk herniation. A 77-year-old man presented with severe leg pain, low back pain, and urinary incontinence. Deep tendon reflexes were inattentive at the knee and ankle, and the motor power in terms of ankle dorsiflexion and great toe dorsiflexion was 2/5 in both lower limbs. There was hypoesthesia in the S1, S2, and S3 dermatomes. Magnetic resonance imaging displayed a large isointensity lesion at the L4–L5 level on the T2 sagittal image, indenting circumferentially the thecal sac from lateral to posterior of the thecal sac. The patient underwent an L4–L5 central laminectomy. A large, solid epidural disk fragment was recognized dorsally, with major compression of the thecal sac. The patient report improved lower extremity motor function at three-month follow-up. A displaced disk fragment should be considered as causative when patients present with cauda equine syndrome and be treated as a surgical emergency.

Keywords: lumbar disk herniation, posterior epidural migration, cauda equine syndrome, spinal cord compression

Introduction

Disk fragment relocation is commonly limited to the anterior epidural space, which is well defined and surrounded by the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) and by the lateral membranes that are linked to PLL.1 Migration of a disk fragment to the posterior epidural space is infrequent. Previously reported cases were related to middle-aged adults who suffered from radiculopathy over a comparatively small period.24 In contrast, our patient was an older man and had a lengthier period of exhibiting minor symptoms. We present an uncommon case of dorsal extradural sequestration of lumbar disk herniation. The patient has given consent for publication of this report.

Case Presentation

History

The patient was a 77-year-old man who presented emergently with sudden onset of severe leg pain, serious low back pain, and urinary incontinence. He suffered from a chronic bilateral radiculopathy without any evidence of neurologic deficit. He had no previous trauma or family history of low back pain, and he had no history of a systemic disorder and any recent weight loss or fever.

Examination

Deep tendon reflexes were absent at the knee and ankle, and the motor power in terms of ankle dorsiflexion and great toe dorsiflexion was 2/5 in both lower limbs. There was hypoesthesia in the S1, S2, and S3 dermatomes. Rectal tone was diminished. In addition, the patient had bladder incontinency.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) displayed a large isointensity lesion at the L4–L5 level on the T2 sagittal and axial images (Figs. 1 and 2), indenting circumferentially the thecal sac from lateral to posterior of the thecal sac, and extrusion of the disk compressing the thecal sac.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sagittal T2 MR imaging revealing an isointensity lesion at the L4–L5 level and extrusion of the disk compressing the thecal sac.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Axial MR imaging revealing extrusion of the disk compressing the thecal sac.

The lesion was isointense to hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Because of the urgency of the case, lumbar spine MR imaging with gadolinium was not taken.

Laboratory standards comprised an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 11 (normal range was between 9 and 15) and a C-reactive protein of 0.5 mg/L (>1.3 was abnormal), making an infectious course improbable.

Operation

The patient underwent an emergent L4–L5 central laminectomy and posterior fusion (due to intraoperative detection of instability) in prone position. A large, solid epidural disk material was recognized dorsally, with major compression of the thecal sac (Figs. 3 and 4). A lengthway division of the lateral boundary of the spinal canal exposed tracking of the disk fragment ventral to the L4–L5 disk space, as well as a significant annular deficiency along the lateral feature of the disk space.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A large (about 4 cm long), solid epidural disk material was recognized dorsally, with major compression of the thecal sac intraoperatively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The operative field and spinal cord after decompression and some portion of posterior disk fragment.

Postoperative course

Clinically, the patient had quick and complete return of motor task and a cessation of radicular pain. He did well postoperatively and had complete recovery of motor function with the motor power of 4/5 in all muscle groups on the first postoperative day. After a few sessions with the in-hospital physical therapists, the patient reports return of normal lower extremity motor strength, which is considered as sufficiently stable for home release. The patient identified the strength of the lower extremities improving at 3 months of follow-up.

Discussion

Disk sequestration can be distinguished as a herniated disk by a tear of the fibrous ring (or outermost annulus fibrosus) with movement of the disk piece to the epidural space.1 The most common corridor in terms of disk fragment migration is a posterior and posterolateral route to the frontal epidural space. This is bordered by the connection of the PLL and its related “midline septum” and “lateral membranes”.1,4,5 Consequently, disk fragment migration frequently occurs cranially, caudally, or laterally, and only rarely lodging in the posterior epidural space. The relocation of a sequestrated disk fragment in this manner has been only rarely reported.2,4 Rather, the majority of the reported cases have concerned the lumbar area, and a small number of cases involving the cauda equine syndrome have been described.2,3 We searched the literature and found just three reports of dorsal disk herniations in elderly patients.6,7

MR imaging, particularly by means of gadolinium administration, appears to be the main option for diagnosis. Sequestrated fragments regularly demonstrate low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, and 80% of cases display a high signal intensity on T2-weighted images in relation to the degenerated disk from which the fragments are derived.8 The high signal intensity on T2-weighted images can be explained as the herniated substance still having a higher water content compared to an unbroken disk or can be due to a reparative course leading to a temporary water increase.8 The residual 20% had isointense signal intensity relative to the degenerated disk on T2-weighted images; a similar result was distinguished in our patient. Most of the disk fragments generate a peripheral contrast enhancement attributed to an inflammatory response with granulation tissue and recently formed vessels approximating to the sequestrated tissue.9

There are numerous differential diagnoses with overlying features for a posterior epidural mass, which predominantly consist of meningioma, hemangioma, metastasis, lymphoma, epidural hematoma, synovial cyst, and abscess.10 Meningiomas and hemangiomas usually reveal a solid and rather homogeneous postcontrast enhancement. In cases of metastases and lymphomas, the patients usually present with multisystem involvement and marrow abnormalities. Abscesses and hematomas usually demonstrate peripheral rim of enhancement with an associated infectious illness or history of trauma.10

Owing to the usual natural history of disk herniation being in an upward or downward direction, there are very few reports of posterior extradural disk migration, given that it is not the first concept that springs to mind.1114 The earliest report of similar kind was presented by Lombardi in 1973.15

In our case, the representative factor with regard to disk herniation was that the patient had an abrupt appearance of symptoms, but otherwise his general health was good. All these factors point toward the less probable likelihood of epidural tumor or abscess. The literature review shows 20 cases of cauda equine syndrome associated with dorsal extradural lumbar disk herniation since the first report by Lombardi15 in 1973. We reviewed the literature and found only two reports of dorsal disk herniation in elderly patients.5,6

Some authors have suggested that heavy labor, traction, spinal manipulation, and conditions of hypermobility may predispose fragments of the disk to posterior migration.16,17 As noted by us in our review of similar cases, most of them have a history of some trauma before the onset of symptoms, which supports this hypothesis. Also, in all cases, prompt surgery involving an open procedure with complete decompression provided good results.

We described a case of cauda equine syndrome secondary to migration of a disk fragment to the posterior epidural space in an elderly man. Defining the site of the lumbar disk herniation, both extradural and intradural, is a diagnostic trial. Whenever there is distress associated with the diagnosis, suitable scans and different diagnostic styles should be applied. Any compressive lesion causing cauda equine syndrome even in the elderly patients should be considered as a sequestrated disk herniation and decompressed as a matter of urgency.

Lessons for Medical Practitioners

  • Posterior migration of a disk fragment is infrequent.

  • PLL, peridural membrane, ligament of Hoffman, dural sac, epidural fat, and neural roots arrangement are accepted barricades to disk migration.

  • Posterior migration of a disk can be a diagnosed as a result of spinal mass effect not only in middle age but also in older patients.

  • Any compressive lesion causing cauda equina syndrome even in the elderly patients should be considered as a sequestrated disk herniation and decompressed as a matter of urgency.

Footnotes

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Athavale Nandkishor, Associate Editor

PEER REVIEW: Four peer reviewers contributed to the peer review report. Reviewers’ reports totaled 864 words, excluding any confidential comments to the academic editor.

FUNDING: Authors disclose no external funding sources.

COMPETING INTERESTS: Authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.

Paper subject to independent expert blind peer review. All editorial decisions made by independent academic editor. Upon submission manuscript was subject to anti-plagiarism scanning. Prior to publication all authors have given signed confirmation of agreement to article publication and compliance with all applicable ethical and legal requirements, including the accuracy of author and contributor information, disclosure of competing interests and funding sources, compliance with ethical requirements relating to human and animal study participants, and compliance with any copyright requirements of third parties. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Author Contributions

Conception and design: KH, HRGQ. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript, approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors, and study supervision: KH.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schellinger D, Manz HJ, Vidic B, et al. Disc fragment migration. Radiology. 1990;175:831–6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dosoglu M, Is M, Gezen F, Ziyal M. Posterior epidural migration of a lumbar disc fragment causing cauda equina syndrome: case report and review of the relevant literature. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(4):348–51. doi: 10.1007/s005860100300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neugroschl C, Kehrli P, Gigaud M, et al. Posterior extradural migration of extruded thoracic and lumbar disc fragments: role of MRI. Neuroradiol. 1999;41:630–5. doi: 10.1007/s002340050815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elgamri A, Sami A, Aqqad A, et al. Posterior migration of a lumbar disk herniation as a cause of cauda equina syndrome. J Radiol. 2009;90(6):731–3. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(09)74728-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarlieve P, Delabrousse E, Clair C, et al. Intradural disc herniation with cranial migration of an excluded fragment. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:170–2. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim JS, Lee SH, Arbatti NJ. Dorsal extradural lumbar disc herniation causing cauda equina syndrome: a case report and review of literature. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;47:217–20. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.3.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen CY, Chuang YL, Yao MS, Chiu WT, Chen CL, Chan WP. Posterior epidural migration of a sequestrated lumbar disk fragment: MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1592–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Modic MT, et al. High-resolution MR imaging of sequestered lumbar intervertebral disks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988;9:351–8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.5.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hwang GJ, Suh JS, Na JB, et al. Contrast enhancement pattern and frequency of previously unoperated lumbar discs on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:575–8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El Khamary SM, Alorainy IA. Case 100: spinal epidural meningioma. Radiology. 2006;241:614–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412040203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bonaroti EA, Welch WC. Posterior epidural migration of an extruded lumbar disc fragment causing cauda equine syndrome. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Spine. 1998;23:378–81. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim JH, Kong MH, Lee SK, Song KY. A case of posterior epidural migration an extruded lumbar disc fragment causing cauda equina syndrome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2004;35:442–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim SJ, Song JH, Kim MH, Park HK, Kim SH, Shin KM. Sequestrated disc mimicking benign neurogenic tumor: report of 2 cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1997;26:596–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lakshmanan P, Ahuja S, Lyons K, Howes J, Davies PR. Sequestrated lumbar intervertebral disc in the posterior epidural space: a report on two cases and review of the literature. Spine J. 2006;6:583–6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lombardi V. Lumbar spinal block by posterior rotation of anulus fibrosis. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1973;39(5):642–4. doi: 10.3171/jns.1973.39.5.0642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuzeyli K, Cakir E, Usul H, et al. Posterior epidural migration of lumbar disc fragments: report of three cases. Spine. 2003;28(3):E64–7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000042272.17850.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akhaddar A, El-Asri A, Boucetta M. Posterior epidural migration of a lumbar disc fragment: a series of 6 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(1):117–28. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES