Skip to main content
New Microbes and New Infections logoLink to New Microbes and New Infections
. 2015 Oct 19;8:154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.10.009

High-quality genome sequence and description of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T sp. nov.

CI Lo 1,2, R Padhmanabhan 1, O Mediannikov 1,2, A Caputo 1, C Michelle 1, N Faye 3, C Sokhna 2, D Raoult 1,2,4, P-E Fournier 1, F Fenollar 1,2,
PMCID: PMC4877407  PMID: 27257496

Abstract

Strain FF3T was isolated from the skin-flora of a 39-year-old healthy Senegalese man. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry did not allow any identification. This strain exhibited a 16S rRNA sequence similarity of 96.8% with Bacillus massiliensis, the phylogenetically closest species with standing nomenclature. Using a polyphasic study made of phenotypic and genomic analyses, strain FF3T was Gram-positive, aeroanaerobic and rod shaped and exhibited a genome of 4 068 720 bp with a G+C content of 37.03% that coded 3982 protein-coding and 67 RNA genes (including four rRNA operons). On the basis of these data, we propose the creation of Bacillus ndiopicus sp. nov.

Keywords: Bacillus ndiopicus, genome, Senegal, skin, taxonogenomics

Introduction

Bacillus subtilis was the first type species described in the genus Bacillus (Cohn 1872) [1]. Currently there are 301 species and seven subspecies with validly published names [2]. Generally members of this genus are environmental bacteria present in soil, food, and fresh and sea water. In humans, some strains can be pathogenic, such as Bacillus cereus (associated mainly with food poisoning) and Bacillus anthracis (the causative agent of anthrax) [3], [4], [5]. Other strains are saprophytes [6]. Several Bacillus species are also isolated from different plants in which they are endophytes [7].

Recently high-throughput genome sequencing and mass spectrometry analyses of bacteria have given unprecedented access to an abundance of genetic and proteomic information [8], [9], [10]. Currently a polyphasic approach is performed to describe new bacterial taxa, including their genome sequence, matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) spectrum, and major phenotypic characteristics such as Gram staining, culture, metabolic characteristics, habitat and (if applicable) pathogenicity [9], [10].

Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T (= CSUR P3025 = DSM 27837) is designated as the type strain of Bacillus ndiopicus. This bacterium is a Gram-positive rod that is aeroanaerobic. This bacterium was isolated from the skin of a healthy Senegalese man as part of a culturomics [11] study aiming at cultivating bacterial species from skin flora.

Here we provide a summary classification and set of features for B. ndiopicus sp. nov. strain FF3T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation. These characteristics support the circumscription of the species B. ndiopicus.

Organism information

Classification and features

In December 2012, a skin specimen was sampled with a swab from a healthy Senegalese volunteer living in Ndiop, a rural village in the Guinean–Sudanian area in Senegal (Table 1). This 39-year-old man was included in a research project approved by the National Ethic Committee for health research (CNERS) in Senegal and the ethics committee of the Institut Fédératif de Recherche IFR48, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France (agreements 09-022 and 11-017) [12].

Table 1.

Classification and general features of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T[15]

MIGS ID Property Term Evidence codea
Classification Domain: Bacteria TAS [27]
Phylum: Firmicutes TAS [28], [29]
Class: Bacilli TAS [30], [31]
Order: Bacillales TAS [32]
Family: Bacillaceae TAS [33]
Genus: Bacillus TAS [34], [35]
Species: Bacillus ndiopicus IDA
(Type) strain: FF3T IDA
Gram stain Positive IDA
Cell shape Rods IDA
Motility Motile IDA
Sporulation Sporulating NAS
Temperature range Mesophile IDA
Optimum temperature 37°C IDA
pH range; optimum 5.6–8.4; 7.0 IDA
Carbon source Unknown
MIGS-6 Habitat Human skin IDA
MIGS-6 Salinity Unknown
MIGS-22 Oxygen requirement Aeroanaerobic IDA
MIGS-15 Biotic relationship Free-living IDA
MIGS-14 Pathogenicity Unknown
MIGS-4 Geographic location Ndiop, Senegal TAS
MIGS-5 Sample collection December 2012 TAS
MIGS-4.1 Latitude 14.5333 TAS
MIGS-4.1 Longitude −16.2667 TAS
MIGS-4.4 Altitude 5 m above sea level TAS

MIGS, minimum information about a genome sequence.

a

Evidence codes are as follows: IDA, inferred from direct assay; TAS, traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS, nontraceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project (http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml) [36]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property should have been directly observed, for the purpose of this specific publication, for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert or reputable institution mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Strain FF3T (Table 1) was isolated by cultivation on 5% blood's sheep enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), under aerobic conditions, in December 2012. B. ndiopicus strain FF3T exhibited a 96.8% nucleotide sequence similarity with Bacillus massiliensis (Glazunova et al., 2006), the phylogenetically closest Bacillus species (Fig. 1). These values were lower than the 98.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence threshold recommended by Meier-Kolthoff et al. [13] to delineate a new species within the phylum Firmicutes without carrying out DNA-DNA hybridization. Different growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45 and 56°C) were tested. Optimal growth was observed at 37 and 45°C after 24 hours of incubation; weak growth was noticed at 30°C. Colonies were 1 mm in diameter and transparent on 5% blood-enriched Columbia agar. Growth of the strain was tested under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions using the GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems, respectively (bioMérieux), and under aerobic conditions, with or without 5% CO2. Optimal growth was obtained under aerobic condition with 5% CO2 and under microaerophilic condition at 37 and 45°C.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T relative to the most closely related type strains within the genus Bacillus. The strains and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA genes are provided (type = T), and in parentheses we indicate GA if the genome is available or GNA if the genome is not available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information website: Bacillus macroides strain LMG 18474 (GNA), Bacillus cereus strain ZQN6, Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain H1k (GA: AYMK00000000), Bacillus massiliensis strain 4400831 (GA: JPVQ00000000), Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T (GA: CCAP000000000), Bacillus odyssey strain NBRC 100172 (GA: JPVP00000000), Solibacillus silvestris strain StLB046 (GA: AP012157), Bacillus isronensis (GA: AMCK00000000), Bacillus smithii strain 7_3_47FAA (GA: ACWF00000000), Bacillus pumilus strain BA06 (GA: AMDH00000000), Bacillus aerius strain 24K, Bacillus pallidus strain CW 7, Bacillus firmus strain DS1 (GA: APVL00000000), Bacillus beringensis strain BR035 (GNA), Bacillus nealsonii strain AAU1 (GA: ASRU00000000), Bacillus circulans NBRC 13626 (GNA), Brevibacillus formosus strain F12 (GNA), Aneurinibacillus migulanus (GA: GCA_000878905), and Pseudomonas alcaliphila strain JAB1 (GNA). Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE [40] and the phylogenetic tree inferred by the maximum likelihood method with Kimura two-parameter model from MEGA6 software [41]. Numbers at the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating the analysis 1000 times to generate a majority consensus tree. P. alcaliphila was used as outgroup. Scale bar = rate of substitution per site of 0.2.

Gram staining showed Gram-positive rods (Fig. 2). The motility test was positive by means of peritrichous flagella. Cells grown on agar have a mean diameter of 1.2 μm (ranging from 0.8 to 1.6 μm) and a mean length of 2.5 μm (ranging from 1.8 to 3.2 μm) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Gram staining of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Transmission electron microscopy of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T. Cells were observed on a Tecnai G20 device operated at 200 keV. Scale bar = 1 μm.

Strain FF3T exhibited catalase and oxidase activities. Using the API ZYM strip (bioMérieux), positive reactions were observed with alkaline phosphatase, esterase, α-chymotrypsin and lipase. Negative reactions were observed for leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, phosphatase acid, trypsin, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase. Using the API 20E strip (bioMérieux), only the citrate test was positive; all others tests were negative, including indole, β-galactosidase, urease, ornithine decarboxylase, mannitol, sorbitol and rhamnose fermentation. Using the API 50CH strip (bioMérieux), no positive reaction was observed, including for glycerol, d-arabinose, d-xylose, l-rhamnose, amygdalin, d-cellobiose, d-fucose, potassium 5-ketogluconate, l-arabitol, starch, d-maltose and d-mannose. B. ndiopicus was susceptible in vitro to penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, imipenem, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, doxycycline, rifampicin and vancomycin, but resistant to nitrofurantoin and metronidazole. When compared with representative species from the genus Bacillus, B. ndiopicus strain FF3T exhibited several phenotypic differences, which are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Differential characteristics of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T with B. kribbensis[37], B. massiliensis[38], B. vireti[39], B. soli[39]

Property B. ndiopicus B. kribbensis B. massiliensis B. vireti B. soli
Cell diameter (μm) 0.8–1.6 1.4–2.0 0.3–0.5 0.6–0.9 0.6–1.2
Oxygen requirement Aeroanaerobic Aerobic Aerobic Facultative anaerobic Facultative anaerobic
Gram stain + + Variable
Motility + + + + +
Endospore formation + + + + +
Production of:
 Alkaline phosphatase + NA NA NA NA
 Acid phosphatase NA NA NA NA
 Catalase + + + NA NA
 Oxidase + NA NA
 Nitrate reductase + +
 Urease NA +
 α-Galactosidase NA NA NA NA
 β-Galactosidase NA NA NA NA
 β-Glucuronidase + NA NA NA
 α-Glucosidase + NA NA NA
 β-Glucosidase + NA NA NA
 Esterase + + NA NA NA
 Esterase lipase + + NA NA NA
 Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase + NA NA NA
 N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase NA NA + +
Utilization of:
 5-Keto-gluconate NA
 d-Xylose +
 d-Fructose + + +
 d-Glucose + + +
 d-Mannose + +
Habitat Human skin Soil Human CSF Soil Soil

+, positive result; −, negative result; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NA, data not available.

MALDI-TOF protein analysis was performed using a Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany), as previously reported [14]. The scores previously established by Bruker allowing validating (or not) the identification of species compared to the database of the instrument were applied. Briefly, a score of ≥2.000 with a species with a validly published name provided allows the identification at the species level; a score of ≥1.700 and <2.000 allows the identification at the genus level; and a score of <1.700 does not allow any identification. We performed 12 distinct deposits from 12 isolated colonies of strain FF3T. Two microliters of matrix solution (saturated solution of alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) in 50% acetonitrile and 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid were distributed on each smear and submitted at air drying for 5 minutes. Then the spectra from the 12 different colonies were imported into MALDI Biotyper 2.0 software (Bruker) and analysed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against the main spectra of 6252 bacterial spectra including 199 spectra from 104 Bacillus species. Scores ranging from 1.2 to 1.4 were obtained for strain FF3T, suggesting that this isolate was not a member of any known species. The reference mass spectrum from strain FF3T was incremented in our database (Fig. 4). The gel view highlighted spectrum differences with other Bacillus species (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Reference mass spectrum from Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T. Spectra from 12 individual colonies were compared and reference spectrum generated.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Gel view comparing Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T spectrum to other members of family Bacillaceae. Gel view displays raw spectra of all loaded spectrum files arranged in pseudo-gel-like look. The x-axis records m/z value. Left y-axis displays running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. Peak intensity is expressed by greyscale scheme code. Color bar and right y-axis indicating relation between color peak is displayed, with peak intensity in arbitrary units. Displayed species are indicated at left.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its 16S rRNA similarity, phylogenetic position and phenotypic differences with other members of the genus Bacillus, which support that Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T likely represents a new bacterial species. This strain is part of a study aiming to characterize the skin flora of healthy Senegalese people. Currently there are more of 270 sequenced genomes of Bacillus species [8]. Strain FF3T is the first genome of B. ndiopicus sp. nov., and its GenBank accession number is CCAP000000000. The genome consists of 23 large contigs. Table 3 shows the project information and its association with minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) 2.0 compliance [15]; associated MIGS records are summarized.

Table 3.

Project information

MIGS ID Property Term
MIGS-31 Finishing quality High-quality draft
MIGS-28 Libraries used Paired end and mate pair
MIGS-29 Sequencing platforms MiSeq
MIGS-31.2 Fold coverage 52×
MIGS-30 Assemblers CLC genomics workbench
MIGS-32 Gene calling method Prodigal
Locus tag Not reported
GenBank ID CCAP000000000
GenBank date of release March 18, 2014
GOLD ID Gp0101144
BIOPROJECT PRJNA224116
MIGS-13 Source material identifier DSM 27837
Project relevance Study of human skin flora

MIGS, minimum information about a genome sequence.

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T (= CSUR P3025 = DSM 27837) was grown aerobically on 5% sheep's blood–enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux) at 37°C. Then we suspended all bacterial colonies in 500 μL of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer 10×. We remove 100 μL of this solution. This volume is completed by 400 μL TE buffer 10×, 25 μL proteinase K and 50 μL sodium dodecyl sulfate and then incubated overnight at 56°C for complete cells lysis. The next day this lysate is purified by washing with a phenol–chloroform solution three times. It is precipitated in absolute ethanol and incubated at −20°C for at least 2 hours. After a first centrifugation at 4°C for 30 minutes at 8000 rpm, the pellet is taken up in 70% ethanol kept at −20°C. A second centrifugation in the same conditions for 20 minutes is performed. After drying the tube in an oven at 37°C for 5 minutes, the DNA is taken up with 65 μL with buffer EB. The genomic DNA concentration was measured at 47.7 ng/μL by the Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Genome sequencing and assembly

Genomic DNA of Bacillus ndiopicus was sequenced on the MiSeq Technology (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with two applications, paired end and mate pair. The paired-end and the mate-pair strategies were barcoded in order to be mixed with 11 other genomic projects prepared with the Nextera XT DNA sample prep kit (Illumina) and 11 other projects with the Nextera Mate-Pair sample prep kit (Illumina).

The genomic DNA was diluted to 1 ng/μL to prepare the paired-end library. The tagmentation step fragmented and tagged the DNA with an optimal size distribution at 0.95 kb. Then limited-cycle PCR amplification (12 cycles) completed the tag adapters and introduced dual-index barcodes. After purification on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), the libraries were then normalized on specific beads according to the Nextera XT protocol (Illumina). Normalized libraries were pooled into a single library for sequencing on the MiSeq. The pooled single strand library was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and paired-end sequencing with dual index reads were performed in a single 39-hour run in 2 × 250 bp.

Total information of 6.8 Gb was obtained from a 807K/mm2 cluster density, with a cluster passing quality control filters of 90.88% (14 553 000 clusters). Within this run, the index representation for Bacillus ndiopicus was determined to 17.96% and present 2 375 297 reads filtered according to the read qualities.

The mate-pair library was prepared with 1 μg of genomic DNA using the Nextera mate-pair Illumina guide. The genomic DNA sample was simultaneously fragmented and tagged with a mate-pair junction adapter. The profile of the fragmentation was validated on an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DNA 7500 labchip. The DNA fragments were ranged in size from 1.5 to 13 kb, with an optimal size at 8 kb. No size selection was performed, and 600 ng of tagmented fragments were circularized. The circularized DNA was mechanically sheared to small fragments on a Covaris device S2 in microtubes (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). The library profile was visualized on a High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer LabChip (Agilent). The libraries were normalized at 2 nM and pooled. After a denaturation step and dilution at 10 pM, the pool of libraries was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and sequencing run were performed in a single 42-hour run in 2 × 250 bp. Bacillus ndiopicus was determined to 8.09%. The 1 023 790 reads were filtered according to the read qualities. CLC Genomics Workbench 8.5.x was used for genome assembly.

Genome annotation

Open reading frames (ORFs) prediction was carried out using Prodigal [16] with default parameters. We removed the predicted ORFs if they spanned a sequencing gap region. Functional assessment of protein sequences was performed by comparing them with sequences in the GenBank [17] and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) databases using BLASTP. tRNAs, rRNAs, signal peptides and transmembrane helices were identified using tRNAscan-SE 1.21 [18], RNAmmer [19], SignalP [20] and TMHMM [21], respectively. Artemis [22] was used for data management, and DNA Plotter [23] was used for visualization of genomic features. In-house Perl and bash scripts were used to automate these routine tasks. ORFans were sequences which have no homology in a given database—that is, nonredundant (nr) or identified if their BLASTP E value was lower than 1e-03 for alignment lengths greater than 80 aa. PHAST was used to identify, annotate and graphically display prophage sequences within bacterial genomes or plasmids [24].

To estimate the nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between B. ndiopicus and other members of Bacillaceae family, orthologous proteins were detected by Proteinortho software [25] (with the following parameters: E value 1e-5, 30% percentage of identity, 50% coverage and algebraic connectivity of 50%) and genomes compared two by two. After fetching the corresponding nucleotide sequences of orthologous proteins for each pair of genomes, we determined the mean percentage of nucleotide sequence identity using the Needleman-Wunsch global alignment algorithm. The script created to calculate AGIOS (average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences) values was named MAGi (Marseille Average genomic identity) and is written in Perl and Bioperl modules.

Genome properties

The genome of B. ndiopicus strain FF3T is 4 068 720 bp long (one chromosome, no plasmid) with a 37.03% G+C content (Fig. 6). Of note, we acknowledge the fact that because the genome of Bacillus ndiopicus is a draft sequence, its exact size might be slightly different from that of our sequence, but given the fold coverage (52×), we are confident that the missing fragments are probably small and do not significantly influence the genome size. Of the 3982 predicted genes, 3915 were protein-coding genes and 67 were RNAs. A total of 1697 genes (43.34%) were assigned a putative function. The properties of the genome are presented in Table 4. Using PHAST software, three prophage regions were identified, including one complete and two incomplete prophages (Table 5). A total of 167 were identified as ORFans (42.65%). The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Graphical circular map of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T chromosome. From outside in, outer two circles show ORFs oriented in forward (colored by COGs categories) and reverse (colored by COGs categories) directions, respectively. Third circle marks rRNA gene operon (red) and tRNA genes (green). Fourth circle shows G+C% content plot. Innermost circle shows GC skew; purple and olive indicate negative and positive values, respectively.

Table 4.

Genome information

Attribute Value % of totala
Genome size (bp) 4 068 720
DNA coding (bp) 3 460 992 85.0
DNA G+C (bp) 1 506 586 37.03
DNA scaffolds 8
Total genes 3982 100
Protein coding genes 3915 98.31
RNA genes 67
Pseudo genes 51 1.18
Genes in internal clusters 208 4.82
Genes with function prediction 1697 43.34
Genes assigned to COGs 1892 48.32
Genes with Pfam domains 3235 75.45
Genes with peptide signals 60 1.53
Genes with transmembrane helices 530 13.5
CRISPR 4

COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat.

a

Total is based on total number of protein-coding genes in annotated genome.

Table 5.

Identified prophage regions of Bacillus ndiopicusa

Region Region length (kb) Completeness No. of coding sequence Region position Phage GC%
1 15.6 Incomplete 16 269 940–285 579 PHAGE_Geobac_virus_E2_NC_009552 36.36
2 62.1 Complete 82 1 127 027–1 189 204 PHAGE_Thermu_OH2_NC_021784 37.40
3 18.7 Incomplete 25 1 843 157–1 861 873 PHAGE_Clostr_phiC2_NC_009231 36.67
a

Region indicates number assigned to region; region length, length of sequence of that region (in bp); completeness, prediction of whether region contains a complete or incomplete prophage; region position, start and end positions of region on bacterial chromosome; phage, phage with highest number of proteins most similar to those in region; and GC%, percentage of GC nucleotides of region.

Table 6.

Number of genes associated with general COGs functional categories

Code Value % Description
J 166 4.24 Translation, ribosome structure and biogenesis
A 0 0.00 RNA processing and modification
K 231 5.90 Transcription
L 127 3.24 Replication, recombination and repair
B 0 0.00 Chromatin structure and dynamics
D 33 0.84 Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
V 76 1.94 Defense mechanisms
T 126 3.21 Signal transduction mechanisms
M 112 2.86 Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N 23 0.58 Cell motility
U 21 0.53 Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O 65 1.66 Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C 105 2.68 Energy production and conversion
G 98 2.50 Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E 231 5.90 Amino acid transport and metabolism
F 75 1.91 Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H 89 2.27 Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I 70 1.78 Lipid transport and metabolism
P 155 3.95 Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q 24 0.61 Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and metabolism
R 348 8.88 General function prediction only
S 303 7.73 Function unknown
195 4.98 Not in COGs

COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database.

Genomic comparative

Today there are more than 277 sequenced genomes of Bacillus species (finished and draft) available in Genomes Online Database [3]. Here we compared B. ndiopicus genome sequence against other members of genus Bacillus, including Bacillus coagulans strain 2-6, B. coagulans strain 36D1, Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain C3-41, Bacillus bataviensis stain LMG 21833, and Bacillus isronensis strain B3W22. Table 7 shows a comparison of genome size, G+C% content, and number of proteins for each genome selected for taxonogenomic study. Indeed, Bacillus ndiopicus has a genome size of 4.06 Mb higher than those of B. coagulans 2–6 (3.07 Mb), B. coagulans 36D1 (3.55 Mb) and B. isronensis B3W22 (4.02 Mb) but lower than those of B. bataviensis LMG 21833 (5.37 Mb) and Lysinibacillus sphaericus C3-41 (4.82 Mb).

Table 7.

Genome comparison of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T with other Bacillus species

No. Organism Accession Size (Mb) No. of proteins GC%
1 Bacillus coagulans 2-6 NC_015634 3.07 2971 47.3
2 Bacillus coagulans 36D1 NC_016023 3.55 3289 46.5
3 Lysinibacillus sphaericus C3-41 CP000817 4,82 4584 37.1
4 Bacillus bataviensis LMG 21833 NZ_AJLS00000000 5.37 5207 39.6
5 Bacillus isronensis B3W22 NZ_AMCK01000000 4.02 3883 38.8
6 Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T CCAP000000000 4.06 3915 37.03

Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T has a G+C content (37.03%) lower than those of all the compared species such as B. coagulans strain 2-6 (47.3%), B. coagulans strain 36D1 (46.5%), B. bataviensis strain LMG 21833 (39.6%), B. isronensis strain B3W22 (38.8%) and L. sphaericus strain C3-41 (37.1%). As it has been suggested in the literature that the G+C content deviation is at most 1% within species, these data are an additional argument for the creation of a new taxon [26].

The number of orthologous genes shared between B. ndiopicus and other Bacillus species as well as the average percentage nucleotide identity calculated using the MAGi method is tabulated in Table 8. On the basis of the analysis of MAGi, the AGIOS ranged from 61.79 to 95.94% among the studied members. The range of AGIOS calculated using MAGi varies from 61.79 to 70.95% between B. ndiopicus and other compared Bacillus species. Antibiotic resistance genes were detected within the genome using the ARDB website (Table 9).

Table 8.

Orthologous gene comparison and average nucleotide identity of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T with other compared genomes

Bacillus ndiopicus Bacillus bataviensis Bacillus coagulans 2-6 Bacillus coagulans 36D1 Bacillus isronensis Lysinibacillus sphaericus
Bacillus ndiopicus 3915 63.67 61.87 61.79 70.95 70.78
Bacillus bataviensis 1623 5207 64.71 64.49 63.31 63.61
Bacillus coagulans 2-6 1281 1617 2971 95.94 62.21 61.78
Bacillus coagulans 36D1 1359 1737 1824 3289 62.11 61.76
Bacillus isronensis 1934 1681 1332 1434 3883 69.18
Lysinibacillus sphaericus 1981 1669 1321 1413 1965 4584

Table 9.

Antibiotic resistance genes in Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3 genome

Gene Size (aa) Function E-value Antibiotic GenBank ID
baca 275 Undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase 3e-66 Bacitracin NC_009832
lmrb 465 ABC transporter system, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B efflux pump 1e-128 Lincomycin AB000617
vanA 266 d-Alanyl-d-alanine carboxypeptidase 1e-65 Vancomycin AM410096
vatb 168 Virginiamycin A acetyltransferase 6e-13 Streptogramin A U19459
str 282 Streptomycin resistance protein 2e-94 Streptomycin P12055
bmr 390 Major facilitator superfamily transporter; multidrug resistance efflux pump 1e-128 Chloramphenicol/fluoroquinolone D84432

Conclusion

On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses (taxonogenomics), we formally propose the creation of Bacillus ndiopicus sp. nov. that contains strain FF3T as the type strain. The strain was isolated from the skin of a 39-year-old healthy Senegalese man living in Ndiop, Senegal.

Description of Bacillus ndiopicus strain FF3T sp. nov.

B. ndiopicus (n.dio.pi.cus. L. gen. masc. n. ndiopicus, of Ndiop, the name of the Senegalese village where the man from whom strain FF3T was cultivated lives).

Cells stain Gram positive, are rod shaped and endospore forming, motile and have a mean diameter of 1.2 μm and a mean length of 2.5 μm. Peritrichous flagellae were observed. Colonies are 1 mm in diameter and transparent on 5% sheep's blood. Optimal growth is achieved at 37°C in an aerobic atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2. Catalase and oxidase activities are positive. Positive reactions were obtained with citrate, alkaline phosphatase, esterase, lipase and α-chymotrypsin. Negative reactions were observed for leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, phosphatase acid, trypsin, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase. B. ndiopicus is susceptible in vitro to penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, imipenem, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, doxycycline, rifampicin and vancomycin, but resistant to nitrofurantoin and metronidazole.

The G+C content of the genome is 37.03%. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HG315675 and CCAP000000000, respectively. The type strain FF3T (= CSUR P3025 = DSM 27837) was isolated from the skin of a healthy 39-year-old Senegalese man living in Ndiop, Senegal.

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Couderc for help in performing the MALDI-TOF analysis. We also thank F. Di Pinto for creating the electron microscope photos. This study was funded by the Méditerranée Infection Foundation.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  • 1.Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen Heft. 1872;1:127–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parte A.C. LPSN—list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D613–D616. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Castagnola E., Fioredda F., Barretta M.A. Bacillus sphaericus bacteraemia in children with cancer: case reports and literature review. J Hosp Infect. 2001;48:142–145. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.0995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Keita M.B., Diene S.M., Robert C., Raoult D., Fournier P.E., Bittar F. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliogorillae sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;9:93–105. doi: 10.4056/sigs.4388124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bottone E.J. Bacillus cereus, a volatile human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:382–398. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mandell G.L., Bennett J.E., Dolin R. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2010. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y.Z., Chen W.F., Li M. Bacillus endoradicis sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from soybean root. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:359–363. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.028936-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pagani I., Liolios K., Jansson J. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D571–D579. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramasamy D., Mishra A.K., Lagier J.C. A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:384–391. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.057091-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sentausa E., Fournier P.E. Advantages and limitations of genomics in prokaryotic taxonomy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:790–795. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lagier J.C., Armougom F., Million M. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:1185–1193. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Trape J.F., Tall A., Diagne N. Malaria morbidity and pyrethroid resistance after the introduction of insecticide-treated bednets and artemisinin-based combination therapies: a longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:925–932. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70194-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meier-Kolthoff J.P., Göker M., Spröer C., Klenk H.P. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol. 2013;195:413–418. doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-0888-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seng P., Drancourt M., Gouriet F. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:543–551. doi: 10.1086/600885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Field D., Garrity G., Gray T. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:541–547. doi: 10.1038/nbt1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hyatt D., Chen G.L., Locascio P.F., Land M.L., Larimer F.W., Hauser L.J. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Benson D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi I., Clark K., Lipman D.J., Ostell J., Sayers E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:48–53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lowe T.M., Eddy S.R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lagesen K., Hallin P., Rodland E.A., Staerfeldt H.H., Rognes T., Ussery D.W. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bendtsen J.D., Nielsen H., von Heijne G., Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004;340:783–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rutherford K., Parkhill J., Crook J. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:944–945. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carver T., Thomson N., Bleasby A., Berriman M., Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:119–120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou Y., Liang Y., Lynch K.H., Dennis J.J., Wishart D.S. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:347–352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lechner M., Findeiss S., Steiner L., Marz M., Stadler P.F., Prohaska S.J. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meier-Kolthoff J.P., Klenk H.P., Göker M. Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:352–356. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.056994-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Woese C.R., Kandler O., Wheelis M.L. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–4579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Skerman V.B.D., Sneath P.H.A. Approved list of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:225–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Garrity G.M., Holt J. The road map to the manual. In: Garrity G.M., Boone D.R., Castenholz R.W., editors. 2nd ed. vol. 1. Springer; New York: 2001. pp. 119–169. (Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:469–472. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.024562-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ludwig W., Schleifer K.H., Whitman W.B. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P., Garrity G., Jones D., editors. 2nd ed. vol. 3. Springer-Verlag; New York: 2009. pp. 19–20. (Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prevot A.R. In: Dictionnaire des bactéries pathogènes. Hauduroy P., Ehringer G., Guillot G., editors. Masson; Paris: 1953. p. 692. Type genus: Bacillus Cohn 1872. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fischer A. Untersuchungen über bakterien. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik. 1895;27:1–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gibson T., Gordon R.E. Genus I. Bacillus Cohn 1872, 174; Nom. gen. cons. Nomencl. Comm. Intern. Soc. Microbiol 1937, 28; Opin. A. Jud. Comm 1955, 39. In: Buchanan R.E., Gibbons N.E., editors. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 8th ed. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore: 1974. pp. 529–550. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mathews W.C., Caperna J., Toerner J.G., Barber R.E., Morgenstern H. Neutropenia is a risk factor for Gram-negative Bacillus bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus–infected patients: results of a nested case–control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:1175–1183. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jee-Min L., Che O.J., Jung R.L., Dong-Jin P., Chang-Jin K. Bacillus kribbensis sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample in Jeju, Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:2912–2916. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Glazunova O.O., Raoult D., Roux V. Bacillus massiliensis sp. nov., isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:1485–1488. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63982-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jeroen H., Bram V., Niall AL Bacillus novalis sp. nov., Bacillus vireti sp. nov., Bacillus soli sp. nov., Bacillus bataviensis sp. nov. and Bacillus drentensis sp. nov., from the Drentse A grasslands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:47–57. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02723-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from New Microbes and New Infections are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES