Abstract
Derivatives of the fully twisted bicyclic amide 7-hypoquinuclidone are synthesized using a Schmidt-Aubé reaction. Their structures were unambiguously confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis and extensive spectroscopic characterization. Furthermore, the stability and chemical reactivity of these anti-Bredt amides are investigated. 7-hypoquinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate is shown to decompose to a unique nitrogen bound amide-BF3 complex of 7-hypoquinuclidone under anhydrous conditions and to react instantaneously with water making it one of the most reactive amides known to date.
Graphical abstract

Introduction
The importance of the amide bond cannot be overstated.1 Typical amides are planar structures,2 however, amide bonds can be highly twisted such as in bicyclic bridgehead lactams.3 The distortion of the orbitals from planarity and the pyramidalization of the nitrogen from sp2 toward sp3 dramatically affect the stability and reactivity3,4 of anti- Bredt amides.5 In 2006, our group published the first unambiguous synthesis and characterization of 2-quinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate 1 (Figure 1).6 Most recently Kirby and co-workers reported on the synthesis and characterization of the “most reactive” twisted amide, an 1-aza-2-adamantone HBF4 salt 2,7 which provoked us to explore the synthesis of an even more reactive amide.
Figure 1.
Stoltz's 2-Quinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate (1), Kirby's “most reactive amide” 2 and Hall's attempted synthesis of 7-hypoquinuclidone 4 from piperidine-4-carboxylic acid (3).
Of interest to us was a 1958 paper, in which Hall failed to synthesize 7-hypoquinuclidone 4 by heating piperidine-4-carboxylic acid (3) in a free flame (Figure 1). Instead, sublimation of the amino acid was observed.8 The highly strained structure of a [2.2.1] bridged bicyclic lactam was also proposed as an intermediate in a model system toward the synthesis of perophoramidine.9 Most recently, the structure, energetics and protonation of 7-hypoquinuclidone 4 were investigated by DFT calculations10 and the molecule has been suggested to be too strained to be isolated.10c
Results and Discussion
Based on the knowledge and experience in our research group with the synthesis of 2-quinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate 1, we proposed a synthesis of 7-hypoquinuclidone 4 using an intramolecular Schmidt-Aubé reaction11 leading to ketoazide 8 as the key fragment (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of protected piperidine 4-carboxylic acid methylester 9 – first proof for the existence of 7-hypoquinuclidone 4.
Synthesis
The synthesis commenced from literature known cyclobutanone N,N-dimethylhydrazone 512, which was alkylated with TBS protected 2-bromoethanol (Scheme 1).13,14 The corresponding intermediate was fully deprotected under acidic conditions to afford hydroxy ketone 6 in 45% yield. Tosylation of the alcohol and substitution with sodium azide gave access to substrate 8 for the intramolecular Schmidt-Aubé reaction. Since it was uncertain, if this highly strained and fully twisted lactam 4·H+ would even exist, we decided to solvolyze this hypothetical intermediate 4·H+ in situ with methanol as the nucleophile. Moreover, the reaction was performed under Fischer esterification conditions to ensure protection of the corresponding amino acid, in case 4·H+ would have been hydrolyzed with traces of water. Thus, treatment of ketoazide 8 with triflic acid15 followed by solvolysis/esterification with methanol and tosyl protection of the amine furnished N-tosyl piperidine 4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (9) in 56% yield over 3 steps after column chromatography.16 It should be noted that the corresponding protected azetidine 10 was not observed at all (it would originate from migration of the other single bond in the Schmidt-Aubé reaction).17
With a first proof for the existence of 7-hypoquinculidone in hand, ketoazide 8 was treated with tetrafluoroboric acid in diethylether, which led to immediate gas evolution and precipitation of a colorless solid (97% mass recovery). NMR experiments revealed the presence of three species in a 77:15:12 ratio: the protonated amide 7-hypoquinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate 4·HBF4, the hydrolysis product 11 and, unexpectedly, the BF3 complex of 7-hypoquinuclidone 4·BF3 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
Total synthesis of 7-hypoquinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate 4·HBF4 and 7-hypoquinuclidone BF3 complex 4·BF3.
Since the formation of 4·BF3 was at first mysterious and somehow unexpected, we were wondering, if traces of BF3 etherate are present in our commercial 50-54% HBF4 solution, which would catalyze the Schmidt-Aubé reaction.18 The inherent instability of HBF4 in acidic solutions was further supported by voltammetric investigations, which indicated decomposition of HBF4 to a BF3-solvent complex and HF.19 To check this hypothesis, ketoazide 8 was subjected to two equivalents of BF3 etherate instead of HBF4 with the ultimate goal to selectively prepare 4·BF3. However, neither gas evolution nor consumption of the starting material was observed, even at room temperature. Subsequently, a catalytic amount of HBF4 was added with the idea that the proton of the Brønsted acid would be formally released after formation of product 4·BF3. In contrast, the catalytic amount of acid was consumed instantaneously with concomitant gas evolution and precipitation of a solid. Thereafter, the reaction did not proceed any further without adding a stoichiometric amount of HBF4 (two equivalents in total). After stirring overnight, we isolated instead of 4·BF3 the hydrolyzed amino acid 11 as the major product (73%) along with 15% of 4·HBF4 and a third unknown species (ca. 12%) according to 1H-NMR spectroscopy.20 When the spectrum was recorded again the next day, the later two species had converted to 11 in a quantitative fashion. At this point, it was still unclear how 4·BF3 was formed, but we gained first evidence for the inherent instability of 4·HBF4 toward hydrolysis in dry CD3CN leading to the expected hydrolysis product isonipecotic acid tetrafluoroborate (11).
Proof of Structure and Spectroscopic Data
7-Hypoquinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate (4·HBF4) was isolated as a stable, colorless solid, which can be stored in a −40 °C freezer of a nitrogen filled glovebox for several weeks without decomposition. However, as soon as the solid is dissolved in any rigorously dried solvent, decomposition starts immediately, even upon handling in the dry atmosphere of a glovebox (N2). For this reason, all of our attempts failed to grow single crystals of 4·HBF4 via precipitation, recrystallization or vapor diffusion method between −40 °C and 23 °C. Fortunately, decomposition was slow enough to characterize 4·HBF4 spectroscopically in CD3CN solution by multinuclear 1H-, 11B-, 19F-, 13C-, 14N-, 15N-NMR spectroscopy in a J. Young NMR tube and as a solid by attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR, Table 1). By contrast, 4·HBF4 was hydrolyzed instantaneously in the matrix of the fast atom bombardment high-resolution mass spectrometer (FAB-HRMS) and in the electrospray ionization chamber (ESI) of a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (LTQ-CID-MS). The mass spectra for 4·HBF4 were identical to those recorded for the hydrolysis product 11. A very characteristic 1:1:1 triplet at 7.76 ppm was observed for the NH+ group in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 4·HBF4 (Figure 2) showing a 1H-14N coupling (J = 63 Hz, I = 1, Table 1). This indicated a highly symmetric environment around the nitrogen, since otherwise the 1H-14N splitting pattern would not be resolved due to significant quadrupolar line broadening.21
Table 1. Selected spectroscopic properties for twisted amides 4·HBF4 and 4·BF3 and for the hydrolysis product isonipecotic acid tetrafluoroborate (11).
| Compounda | 4·HBF4 | 4·BF3 | 11 |
|---|---|---|---|
| δ1H of NHx | 7.76 (t, 1J1H14N = 63 Hz) | − | 6.90-6.12 (m, 1J1H14N = ∼55 Hz) |
| δ13C of C=O | 174.7 | 179.8 | 169.7 |
| δ11B | −1.2 (s) | −0.3 (q, 1J11B19F = 13.8 Hz) | −1.2 (s) |
| δ19F | −151.3 (s) | −154.9 (q, 1J19F11B = 13.9 Hz) | −151.2 (s) |
| δ14N | 34.8 (d, 1 J14N1H = 62.8 Hz) | 39.3 (s) | −4.9 (m, 1J14N1H = not resolved) |
| δ15Nb | 78.6 (1J15N1H = ∼88 Hz) | − | 38.8 (1J15N1H = ∼77 Hz)c |
| IR, νmax C=O, cm-1 | 1877d | 1860d | 1814e |
All NMR spectra were recorded in CD3CN.
Due to the low abundance of this isotope, the chemical shifts and coupling constants were determined by 1H-15N and 1H{15N}-15N correlation experiments.
A vicinal proton coupling constant of 2J1H1H = 10.8 Hz was observed.
Measured using an ATR-IR in an argon filled glovebox.
Neat film on a NaCl plate.
Figure 2.
Detail of the 1H-NMR spectrum of 4·HBF4 showing the distinctive 1:1:1 triplet of the protonated amide.
These findings for 4·HBF4 were further confirmed by the observed doublets in the 14N- and 15N-NMR spectra (Table 1). The carbonyl infrared absorption band of 4·HBF4 was observed at 1877 cm-1 (ATR), which is the highest value we have ever observed for an organic molecule, even higher than acid chlorides or anhydrides. This value suggests a rather short and strong C=O bond in a highly strained molecule. These conclusions were in line with our DFT calculations for the structure of 4·HBF4 (see Table 21 in the SI).22 Moreover, since we did not observe any other C=O bands nor overlapping IR signals originating from the other two species (4·BF3 and 11), the recorded IR spectrum of 4·HBF4 was evidence for high purity of the isolated crude solid after the reaction. The observed mixture in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 4·HBF4, 4·BF3 and 11 (Scheme 2) most likely resulted from decomposition by dissolving the solid in CD3CN and in the time until the NMR spectra were recorded.
A single crystal of 4·BF3 suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis was grown over four weeks by slow diffusion of diethyl ether into a solution of the crude twisted amide 4·HBF4 in acetonitrile at −40 °C in the glove box (N2). The crystal structure of 4·BF3 is depicted in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
X-ray structure of 7-hypoquinuclidone BF3 complex 4·BF3 (ellipsoids at the 50% probability level, oxygen = red, nitrogen = blue, boron = pink, fluorine = yellow, carbon = dark gray, hydrogen = white).
In all our attempts to crystallize the protonated twisted amide 4·HBF4, we could only isolate crystals of the BF3 complex 4·BF3, which apparently is the more stable compound of the two amides (Figure 3). To our knowledge, the BF3 complex of 7-hypoquinuclidone 4·BF3 is the first and only nitrogen bound BF3-amide complex reported to date. A single molecule of 4·BF3 was observed in the unit cell of the crystal with a high degree of symmetry (mirror plane through the F-B-N-C=O axis). The compound clearly belongs among the most twisted amides with a torsion angle τ of 90.0°. The nitrogen is highly pyramidalized with an out-of-plane parameter χN of 69.8°, while the carbonyl carbon is exactly planar and sp2 hybridized (χC = 0.0°). The observed length of the N-C(O) bond is 1.526 Å, 1.186 Å for the C=O bond and 1.606 Å for N-B bond, respectively. These parameters were all in close agreement to the calculated structure of 4·BF3 (see Table 21 in the SI and compare with parameters of other twisted amides and more calculated structures). Selected spectroscopic parameters of 4·BF3 are summarized in Table 1. The 13C chemical shift of the carbonyl group in 4·BF3 is 5 ppm more downfield than in 4·HBF4, which is also true for the 19F chemical shift at −154.9 ppm. In the later case, the 1J coupling to 11B (I = 3/2) was observed as a 1:1:1:1 quartet with a coupling constant of 14 Hz.23 The reverse coupling to 19F (I = ½) was visible at −0.3 ppm as a 1:3:3:1 quartet in the 11B-NMR spectrum, however without any coupling to 14N.24 The carbonyl stretching vibration for 4·BF3 was observed at 1860 cm-1, which is a slightly lower frequency than for 4·HBF4. This trend is in line with a slightly longer C=O bond for 4·BF3 than for 4·HBF4 according to our DFT calculations (see Table 21 in the SI).
The formal hydrolysis product of 4·HBF4, isonipecotic acid tetrafluoroborate (11), was fully characterized by spectroscopic methods (Table 1) and the structure was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (see the SI). As for the protonated twisted amide 4·HBF4, spin couplings of 1H-14N and 1H-15N were observed with coupling constants of 55 Hz and 77 Hz, respectively. Remarkably, the C=O IR stretching frequency at 1814 cm-1 (NaCl) was rather high for a carboxylic acid.
Chemical Behavior
As described earlier in this paper, the protonated amide 4·HBF4 was much more sensitive to nucleophiles than the BF3 complex 4·BF3. 4·HBF4 decomposed very quickly in solution, even in rigorously dried solvents and with careful handling in the glovebox. For this reason, the NMR spectra of dissolved 4·HBF4 had to be recoded as fast as possible, since the signals corresponding to 4·HBF4 disappeared very quickly and several new species were formed over time. In contrast, solutions of the corresponding BF3 complex 4·BF3 were fairly stable according to NMR spectroscopy. This raised the question, if the BF3 complex 4·BF3 is the decomposition product of the very labile amide 4·HBF4 in dry solution, which would also explain, why we could grow crystals of 4·BF3 out of a solution of 4·HBF4.
To answer these questions, we studied the decomposition and reactivity of both twisted amides 4·BF3 and 4·HBF4 in CD3CN in the presence or absence of D2O over time using a series of 1H-NMR measurements with 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene as the internal standard (Scheme 3, see the SI for more details).
Scheme 3.
Reactivity for 4·HBF4 and 4·BF3 in solution and determination of their half-lives.
4·BF3 was fairly stable in wet CD3CN with a half-life of 87 minutes (9.6 equivalents of D2O, 10.6 μM) yielding a complex mixture of products along with amino acid 11 (Scheme 3). By contrast, the protonated amide 4·HBF4 was hydrolyzed instantaneously upon addition of 5 equivalents of D2O (t1/2 = <1 min, 87.4 μM) to give amino acid 11 as the major product. Compared to the half-lives of 2-quinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate 1 (t1/2 = 135 min, 84 μM, 5 equiv)6a and Kirby's “most reactive amide” 2 (t1/2 = 8.4 min, 84 μM, 5 equiv D2O, Figure 1),7 7-hypoquinuclidonium tetrafluoroborate 4·HBF4 is now the most reactive twisted amide prepared to date. In addition, 4·HBF4 decomposed in dry CD3CN with a half-life of 119 minutes (117 μM). At the same time, saturation growth of the BF3 complex 4·BF3 was observed over time, which strongly indicated that 4·BF3 is indeed formed from 4·HBF4 in dry CD3CN solution. It should be noted that several other unidentified species were observed together with 4·BF3. However, amino acid 11 was not detected at all due to the absence of water.
When the twisted amides 4·HBF4 and 4·BF3 and the amino acid 11 were characterized by FAB-HRMS, we found identical spectra due to fast hydrolysis in the matrix, but also a common dehydration fragment with m/z 112.1 corresponding to the protonated twisted amide 4·H+ or its ring-chain tautomer as an oxocarbonium ion (Scheme 4). Since we previously observed dehydration of the hydrolyzed twisted amide 1 (Figure 1) via collision induced dissociation (CID),6b this raised the question if 11 was dehydrated to 4·H+ by FAB ionization in the matrix or in the gas phase. To investigate this, we isolated the ammonium ion of 11 with m/z 130.1 in the ion trap of the LTQ-MS. Upon collisional excitation (MS2-CID), we did indeed observe dehydration giving an ion 4·H+ with m/z 112.1 in the mass spectrum (see the SI for the spectra). When isolation and excitation of 4·H+ was continued in a multistage MS experiment (MS3), a formal loss of CO (M-28) corresponding to an ion with m/z 81.4 was observed.
Scheme 4.
Gas phase and thermal reactivity of isonipectotic acid derivatives.
Inspired by Kirby's observation for thermal cyclization to adamantane type twisted amides in the gas phase,7 we attempted to cyclize amino acid 11 and the commercially available Boc protected derivative 12 by gas chromatography (Scheme 4). However, all attempts failed and no ions were observed at all.
Definition of Bending Angle ξ
We observed significant bending of the carbonyl oxygen towards the nitrogen in the crystal structure of 4·BF3 (Figure 3) and we found that this phenomenon was significantly underestimated in our calculated structure of 4·BF3 (see Table 21 in the SI). Since there wasn't any parameter available in the literature to describe C=O bending, we introduced a C=O bending angle ξ, which is defined as the deviation of the imaginary CCN angle bisector (Figure 4). Mathematically, ξ can be calculated with the bond path angles CCN, OCC and OCN:25 ξ = ((360°-CCN)/2-OCN. A positive value means bending toward the nitrogen and a negative one bending into the opposite direction. For the crystal and the calculated structure of 4·BF3, we observed ξ values of 5.8° and 4.5°, respectively.
Figure 4.
Definition of the bending angle ξ and the dominant orbital interactions of the p-type lone pair of the C=O oxygen.
In 1985, Bürgi and Schmidt investigated C=O bending in lactones and lactams for the first time based on X-ray structures and molecular orbital calculations.26 An anomeric effect was proposed to explain this phenomenon, which involves destabilizing interactions of the p-type lone pair at oxygen with the bonding σ(C-C) orbital and favorable overlap with the antibonding σ*(C-N) orbital (Figure 4). Thus, C=O bending will reduce the former interaction and increase the later one.26 At the same time, C=O bending is an early sign of C-N bond breakage leading to an oxocarbonium ion similar to 4·H+ (Scheme 4) with concomitant C-N bond elongation.26 In line with our own data (see Table 21 in the SI), significant deviations of calculated ξ values were observed compared to X-ray structures by Bürgi26 and others.10c, 27
Since C=O bending is a significant deformation of the amide bond in anti-Bredt lactams and an additional measure for their stability, we suggest to use the Bürgi-Dunitz-Winkler parameters (χC, χN, τ, ξ) to describe twisted amides in the future.
Conclusions
Almost 60 years after Hall's first attempt to prepare 7-hypoquinuclidone 4,8 we have successfully accomplished the first total synthesis and complete characterization of the protonated twisted amide 4·HBF4 and its BF3 complex 4·BF3. The use of a Schmidt-Aubé reaction proved again to be key for success.6a Moreover, the stability and reactivity of both 4·HBF4 and 4·BF3 were thoroughly investigated in solution and in the gas phase. These studies revealed that 4·HBF4 is to our knowledge the most reactive amide prepared to date with a half-life of less than one minute in the presence of water. The reverse reaction to 4·H+ was rendered possible in the gas phase by formal dehydration of isonipecotic acid 11 using FAB or CID excitation. Since C=O bending contributes to the stability of twisted amides26 and is still difficult to predict by DFT calculations,10c, 26, 27 a novel bending angle ξ was defined as an addition to the already existing Dunitz-Winkler parameters.5 Looking ahead, the limits are still open for the synthesis of more or less reactive but structurally unique twisted amides.
Methods
Standard methods were used for the preparation, isolation, and analysis of all new compounds (for experimental details and complete characterization see the SI).
Preparation of 4·HBF4 and Crystallization of 4·BF3 from keto azide 8
To a solution of 8 (52.0 mg, 0.37 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in Et2O (0.75 mL) was added at 0 °C HBF4 (0.10 mL, 0.71 mmol, 1.9 equiv, 50-54% wt/wt in Et2O). Gas evolution was observed immediately. After stirring for 1 h at room temperature, the starting material was fully consumed and a colorless precipitate had been formed. The solvent was decanted off with a syringe under argon. The solids were washed with Et2O (3 × 0.8 mL) and dried under high vacuum to afford crude 4·HBF4 (72.0 mg, 97% mass recovery) as a colorless solid. Slow diffusion of Et2O into a solution of the crude product in acetonitrile at −40 °C over four weeks yielded one single crystal of 4·BF3 (2.0 mg, 3%) as a colorless needle.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank NIH-NIGMS (R01GM080269), Amgen, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Caltech Center for Catalysis and Chemical Synthesis, and Caltech for financial support. M.L. thanks the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for a postdoctoral fellowship (P2EZP2_148751). Jonathan Rittle is acknowledged for assistance with the ATR-IR and the Peters group for using their equipment. We are indebted to Dr. Kousouke Tani and Dr. Michael Krout for taking the first steps in creating the twisted amide project and for establishing their synthesis, isolation and crystallization.
Footnotes
Notes: The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Associated Content: Experimental procedures, characterization data, crystallographic information files, calculated geometries, and details of kinetic measurements. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Greenberg A, Breneman CM, Liebman JF, editors. The Amide Linkage: Structural Significance in Chemistry, Biochemistry and Material Science. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Pauling L, Corey RB, Branson HR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1951;37:205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.37.4.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pauling L, Corey RB. J Am Chem Soc. 1952;74:3964. [Google Scholar]; (c) Corey RB, Pauling L. Proc Roy Soc B. 1953;141:10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.For the most recent review about the synthesis and reactivity of bridged lactams; Szostak M, Aubé J. Chem Rev. 2013;113:5701. doi: 10.1021/cr4000144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Hall HK, Jr, El-Shekeil A. Chem Rev. 1983;83:549–555. [Google Scholar]; (b) Clayden J Nature. 2012;481:274. doi: 10.1038/481274a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Aubé J Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:3063. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.For the definition of amide bond deformation see:; Dunitz JD, Winkler FK. Acta Cryst. 1975;B31:251. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Tani K, Stoltz BM. Nature. 2006;441:731. doi: 10.1038/nature04842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ly T, Krout M, Pham DK, Tani K, Stoltz BM, Julian RR. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:1864. doi: 10.1021/ja067703m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Komarov IV, Yanik S, Ishchenko AY, Davies JE, Goodman JM, Kirby AJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:926. doi: 10.1021/ja511460a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hall HK., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:6412. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fuchs JR, Funk RL. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:5068. doi: 10.1021/ja049569g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Morgan J, Greenberg A. J Chem Thermodynamics. 2014;73:206. [Google Scholar]; (b) Szostak R, Aubé J, Szostak M. Chem Commun. 2015;51:6395. doi: 10.1039/c5cc01034a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Szostak R, Aubé J, Szostak M. J Org Chem. 2015;80:7905. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aubé J, Milligan GL. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:8965. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cyclobutanone N,N-dimethylhydrazone was prepared according to:; Mino T, Masuda S, Nishio M, Yamashita M. J Org Chem. 1997;62:2633. doi: 10.1021/jo9623043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.TBS protected 2-bromoethanol was prepared according to:; Kuwabe S, Torraca KE, Buchwald SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:12202. doi: 10.1021/ja012046d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alkylation of cyclobutanone N,N-dimethylhydrazone 5 with 1-azido-2-iodoethane failed to give ketoazide 8 in one step, since addition of the electrophile to the anion of 5 led to vigorous gas evolution and immediate decomposition of the reaction mixture.
- 15.Neither gas evolution nor conversion was observed when 1.5 equivalents of trifluoroacetic acid were used without any triflic acid.
- 16.Traces of the protected dimer and trimer of 9 were detected by LC-MS in the crude reaction mixture (see the SI for the spectra), which was an evidence for the polymerizability of 4 Compare with reference (8).
- 17.Shifting of the alkyl group antiperiplanar to the N2 leaving group is favored according to:; (a) Yao L, Aubé J. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2766. doi: 10.1021/ja068919r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Szostak M, Aubé J. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:27. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00215a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gutierrez O, Aubé J, Tantillo DJ. J Org Chem. 2012;77:640. doi: 10.1021/jo202338m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.For BF3 etherate mediated Boyer-Schmidt-Aubé reactions see:; (a) Gracias V, Milligan GL, Aubé J. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:8047. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gracias V, Frank KE, Milligan GL, Aubé J. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:16241. [Google Scholar]; (c) Forsee JE, Aubé J. J Org Chem. 1999;64:4381. [Google Scholar]; (d) Smith BT, Gracias V, Aubé J. J Org Chem. 2000;65:3771. doi: 10.1021/jo000056b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Desai P, Schildknegt K, Agrios KA, Mossman C, Milligan GL, Aubé J. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:7226. [Google Scholar]; (f) Lertpibulpanya D, Marsden SP. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:3498. doi: 10.1039/b608801e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Shinde MV, Ople RS, Sangtani E, Gonnade R, Reddy DS. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2015;11:1060. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.11.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bontempelli G, Seeber R, Zecchin S, Schiavon G. J Electroanal Chem. 1976;73:295. [Google Scholar]
- 20.A characteristic singlet at 9.28 ppm was observed in the crude 1H-NMR spectrum (500 MHz, CD3CN).
- 21.(a) Lehn JM, Franck-Neumann M. J Chem Phys. 1965;43:1421. [Google Scholar]; (b) Burgar MI, Amour TE, Fiat D. J Phys Chem. 1981;85:502. [Google Scholar]
- 22.The calculated bond length for N-C(O) in 4·HBF4 is 1.613 Å, which is longer than in 4·BF3 (measured 1.526 Å and calculated 1.534 Å, respectively).
- 23.Unresolved coupling of 19F to 10B (I = 3) was observed as well (a septet would be expected). However, the minor signal was overlapping with the more intense peak originating from 11B coupling (ca. 1/3 intensity of the major peak).
- 24.The absence of 11B-14N coupling is in line with heteronuclear NMR experiments on trimethylamine-boron trihalide complexes:; Hall Clippard P, Cooper Taylor R. Inorg Chem. 1969;8:2802. [Google Scholar]
- 25.The sum of the three bond path angles CCN, OCC and OCN is 360°.
- 26.Nørskov-Lauritsen L, Bürgi HB, Hofmann P, Schmidt HR. Helv Chim Acta. 1985;68:76. [Google Scholar]
- 27.(a) Wiberg KB, Laidig KE. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:5935. [Google Scholar]; (b) Greenberg A, Venanzi CA. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:6951. [Google Scholar]








