Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2016 May 23;54(6):1500–1511. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00235-16

A Method for Amplicon Deep Sequencing of Drug Resistance Genes in Plasmodium falciparum Clinical Isolates from India

Pavitra N Rao a, Swapna Uplekar a, Sriti Kayal b, Prashant K Mallick c, Nabamita Bandyopadhyay c, Sonal Kale c, Om P Singh c, Akshaya Mohanty d, Sanjib Mohanty e, Samuel C Wassmer f,*, Jane M Carlton a,
Editor: M J Loeffelholzg
PMCID: PMC4879288  PMID: 27008882

Abstract

A major challenge to global malaria control and elimination is early detection and containment of emerging drug resistance. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods provide the resolution, scalability, and sensitivity required for high-throughput surveillance of molecular markers of drug resistance. We have developed an amplicon sequencing method on the Ion Torrent PGM platform for targeted resequencing of a panel of six Plasmodium falciparum genes implicated in resistance to first-line antimalarial therapy, including artemisinin combination therapy, chloroquine, and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The protocol was optimized using 12 geographically diverse P. falciparum reference strains and successfully applied to multiplexed sequencing of 16 clinical isolates from India. The sequencing results from the reference strains showed 100% concordance with previously reported drug resistance-associated mutations. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in clinical isolates revealed a number of known resistance-associated mutations and other nonsynonymous mutations that have not been implicated in drug resistance. SNP positions containing multiple allelic variants were used to identify three clinical samples containing mixed genotypes indicative of multiclonal infections. The amplicon sequencing protocol has been designed for the benchtop Ion Torrent PGM platform and can be operated with minimal bioinformatics infrastructure, making it ideal for use in countries that are endemic for the disease to facilitate routine large-scale surveillance of the emergence of drug resistance and to ensure continued success of the malaria treatment policy.

INTRODUCTION

Mortality due to malaria has decreased by half since 2000, and the global incidence has decreased by 37%, yet the disease remains a significant public health burden (1). Countries with large populations in particular struggle to combat the disease with underresourced and inadequate health care facilities. India, with its population of 1.2 billion, contributes a significant number of malaria cases each year, although it has been making significant progress toward the goal of zero malaria cases set by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme. Indeed, India is now in the control phase of a four-phase path toward a malaria-free status, with an aim of reaching preelimination status by 2017 (2).

One of the major threats to global malaria control is the rise and spread of parasite resistance to antimalarial drugs. In order to achieve preelimination status by 2017, India needs to scale up interventions to ensure the efficacy of first-line antimalarial therapy and monitor the emergence of drug-resistant parasites, particularly in areas with the highest disease burden. Effective monitoring of drug efficacy and surveillance of drug resistance in regions endemic for malaria require an integrated approach comprising in vivo drug trials, in vitro/ex vivo drug efficacy assays, and tracking of molecular markers of drug resistance. In vivo testing is the gold standard to measure clinical efficacy of antimalarial drugs, but it is expensive and difficult to implement on a regular basis and on a large scale. In vitro assays provide an understanding of intrinsic resistance; however, they are labor-intensive and require laboratory infrastructure for in vitro culture. In contrast, molecular markers of resistance offer a simpler alternative for routine surveillance. Although these do not take into account host immunity and drug pharmacokinetics, molecular markers can help track the emergence of drug-resistant malaria parasites before they become clinically evident (3).

A number of molecular genotyping techniques have been developed and implemented over the last few decades for monitoring drug resistance in clinical isolates. Traditional methods include restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (4), molecular beacons (5), real-time PCR (6, 7), dot blot probe hybridization (8), and single-nucleotide primer extension (9). More recent high-throughput methods include high-resolution DNA melting (HRM) (10, 11), a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based custom genotyping assay (12, 13), a TaqMan allelic discrimination assay (14), mass spectrometry-based SNP genotyping (15), a ligase detection reaction fluorescent microsphere (LDR-FM) assay (16), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (17). Each method comes with its own advantages and disadvantages, so researchers can choose a suitable technique based on the requirements, facilities, and resources available. A common limitation of these techniques is that while they allow the detection of known resistance alleles of a particular gene, they do not facilitate the discovery of novel genetic polymorphisms that could be involved in drug resistance. Sanger sequencing of DNA polymorphisms provides one method for identifying novel drug resistance polymorphisms and has served as a gold standard for the validation of molecular genotyping. However, its application to large-scale surveillance is limited by low throughput, inability to detect polymorphisms at minor frequencies, and the high cost of reagents.

As a result of its high throughput, resolution, and scalability, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been harnessed to develop genomic tools for understanding the genetic diversity and evolution of pathogens, characterizing transmission networks, and importantly, detecting drug resistance. In addition, the development of modestly priced benchtop sequencing instruments with high turnover rates makes it possible to integrate NGS into countries that are endemic for the disease. There are a number of publications that describe the application, implementation, and running costs for the most commonly used benchtop instruments, including performance comparisons based on technical specifications, data quality, throughput, and overall performance, and these can be referenced for further information (1823). While whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of pathogen field samples is ideal, it is impractical for analyzing hundreds of clinical samples given the current high costs of sequencing reagents, and data storage and manipulation requirements. In contrast, amplicon sequencing involves targeted amplification of one or several loci, followed by NGS to generate a large number of sequencing reads that can be used to assess the genetic diversity in clinical samples. This method is more suitable for analysis of clinical samples, as it requires much less DNA than that with WGS and can utilize DNA obtained from filter paper blood spots or small-volume collections without the need for preprocessing of samples to remove human DNA contamination (24). Amplicon sequencing of single genomic loci has been used to identify parasite haplotypes in Plasmodium falciparum by 454 pyrosequencing of the circumsporozoite protein gene (25, 26), and to detect genetic signatures of Plasmodium vivax relapse by Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) sequencing of the merozoite surface protein-1 locus (27).

In this paper, we describe a novel protocol for Ion Torrent PGM amplicon sequencing of a panel of P. falciparum drug resistance genes, based upon a method developed by Daum et al. (28, 29) to evaluate Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance in clinical strains. Our panel of P. falciparum drug resistance markers includes genes implicated in resistance to artemisinin derivatives, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, chloroquine, and other drugs. The protocol was tested first on 12 publicly available P. falciparum reference strains and subsequently applied to clinical isolates from patients in India, with the ultimate goal of establishing it as a routine surveillance method in a country that is endemic for the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement.

The clinical samples examined in this study were collected after ethical approval from the New York University institutional review board (study no. i10-00173) and the ethics committee of Ispat General Hospital, Raurkela, India.

P. falciparum reference strains.

Genomic DNA from P. falciparum strains NF54 E (MRA-1000G), TM91C235 (MRA-206G), Dd2 (MRA-150G), 7G8 (MRA-152G), HB3 (MRA-155G), W2 (MRA-157G), K1 (MRA-159G), V1/S (MRA-176G), D10 (MRA-201G), GB4 (MRA-925G), D6 (MRA-285G), and FCB (MRA-309G) was obtained from the Malaria Research and Reference Reagents Resource (MR4, Manassas, VA, USA). The geographical location and drug resistance phenotype of the strains (where known) are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Geographical origin, source, and drug resistance phenotype of 12 P. falciparum laboratory reference strains and 16 P. falciparum clinical isolates from Raurkela, India

Sample name(s) Geographical origin Source Drug resistance phenotypea
Reference(s)
CQ SUL PYR
NF54 E The Netherlands; presumed African origin MR4 S S S 85
TM91C235 Thailand MR4 R R R 86
Dd2 Indochina MR4 R R R 85
7G8 Brazil MR4 R S R 85
HB3 Honduras MR4 S S R 85
W2 Indochina MR4 R R R 86
K1 Thailand MR4 R R R 85
V1/S Vietnam MR4 R R R 85
D10 Papua New Guinea MR4 S S S 55, 72, 87
GB4 Ghana MR4 R NA NA 88
D6 Sierra Leone MR4 S S S 85
FCB Colombia MR4 R NA S 85
RKL9610, RKL10551, RKL10868, RKL12330, RKL50072, RKL50617, RKL58812, RKL58925, RKL59175, RKL59290, RKL59796, RKL60303, RKL60308, RKL60355, RKL61495, RKL64249 Ispat General Hospital, Raurkela, India Clinical isolates NA NA NA
a

S, sensitive; R, resistant; NA, not available.

P. falciparum clinical isolates.

Parasite isolates were obtained from 16 patients admitted to Ispat General Hospital (IGH) in Raurkela, Odisha, India, between August 2014 and January 2015, and as part of the National Institutes of Health-funded International Center of Excellence in Malaria Research (ICEMR) (30). Malaria transmission in the Raurkela area is seasonal meso-/hyperendemic, with P. falciparum as the major infecting species. Patients were enrolled after obtaining informed consent and treated with antimalarials, as per the Indian national guidelines (31). An average of 5 ml of blood was collected in EDTA Vacutainers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) from each subject and centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min at room temperature. Plasma and platelets were removed and pelleted infected red blood cells stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. Four of the samples were leukocyte depleted before storage: one sample (RKL59796) was passed through a CF11 filtration column (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), and three samples (RKL64249, RKL50072, and RKL12330) were passed through Plasmodipur filters (EuroProxima, The Netherlands). DNA was extracted from each of the 16 samples using the QIAamp DNA blood MIDI kit (Qiagen, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Primer design.

Oligonucleotide primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) spanning six P. falciparum genes, kelch protein Pfk13 (PF3D7_1343700), chloroquine resistance transporter Pfcrt (PF3D7_0709000), bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase Pfdhfr-ts (PF3D7_0417200), hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase-dihydropteroate synthetase Pfpppk-dhps (PF3D7_0810800), multidrug resistance protein Pfmdr1 (PF3D7_0523000), and multidrug resistance-associated protein-1 Pfmrp1 (PF3D7_0112200) were designed with Primer3 (32) using the 3D7 reference assembly version 3.0 from the malaria database PlasmoDB (33). The Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) OligoAnalyzer software was used to calculate the melting temperature (Tm), and for homo- and heterodimer analysis, and NCBI Primer-BLAST (34) was used to test species specificity. All oligonucleotides were synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich, USA.

Gene amplification.

Amplification reactions were carried out with 5 ng of MR4 reference strain DNA or 2 μl of clinical isolate DNA as the template in a 25-μl reaction volume with Phusion high-fidelity PCR master mix, HF buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and a 0.2 μM concentration of forward and reverse primers. The cycling parameters used to amplify all loci were as follows: 98°C for 30 s, 35 cycles of (98°C for 10 s and 64°C for 5 min 30 s) (35), with a final extension at 64°C for 10 min. Amplicons were visualized on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, using a GeneRuler 1-kb Plus DNA ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR products from a single sample were pooled and purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) and quantified using a Qubit double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) HS assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Library preparation and amplicon sequencing.

A total of 500 ng of purified pooled PCR product from each sample was used to prepare fragment libraries using the NEBNext Fast DNA fragmentation and library prep set for Ion Torrent (New England BioLabs, MA, USA). Ion Xpress barcode adapters 1 to 28 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to facilitate multiplexing of 28 samples for each sequencing run. Libraries were size selected using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) and amplified with Q5 polymerase (New England BioLabs). Qualitative assessment of the libraries was carried out on the Agilent 2200 TapeStation system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) using high-sensitivity D1000 reagents (Agilent Technologies), to ensure proper size selection and absence of adaptor/primer dimers. Fragment libraries were then quantified on a Roche LightCycler 480 instrument II (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using the complete library quantification kit optimized for the Roche LightCycler 480 (Kapa Biosystems, MA, USA), and an equimolar pool of barcoded libraries was created. The library pool was templated on Ion Sphere particles using the Ion PGM Hi-Q OT2 kit on the Ion OneTouch 2 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Template-positive Ion Sphere particles were then enriched using the Ion OneTouch ES and loaded onto an Ion 318 Chip using the Ion Torrent PGM Hi-Q sequencing kit for 200-bp sequencing (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Data processing.

Sequencing data were analyzed using the Ion Torrent platform software (Torrent Suite version 4.6). Raw reads were demultiplexed and filtered using standard quality filtering parameters by the Torrent Suite pipeline software. Read quality was assessed using the Torrent Suite FastQC plugin version 0.10.1, and high-quality reads were aligned to the reference using the Torrent Mapping Alignment Program version 4.0. The reference data file used was a multi-FASTA file containing the complete gene sequence and 300-bp flanking regions for each amplicon target gene from the P. falciparum 3D7 genome using the PlasmoDB database (33). Sequencing depth and coverage across all gene targets were obtained using the Coverage Analysis plugin (version 4.6.0.3) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

Variant calling and annotation.

Variant calling (see Table S3 in the supplemental material) was performed using low-stringency parameters using the Ion Torrent Variant Caller plugin (version 4.6.0.7). SNP calls were characterized using the P. falciparum 3D7 annotation and subsequently processed using custom filtering criteria (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). Given the high average read depth (700×), variants with a read coverage of <100, quality score of <100, and SNP coverage of ≤ reads were discarded. SNP annotation was performed using in-house perl and MS Excel VBA scripts (available upon request). In the case of multiple-nucleotide polymorphisms (MNPs) affecting the same codon, if the difference in the SNP allele frequencies was <40%, they were merged to calculate the resulting codon change; if the difference was >40% and the allele frequency of one of the MNPs was <10%, only the SNP with highest allele frequency was used to determine the codon change. Only high-quality variants were used for haplotype generation. At positions where no variants were reported, we confirmed the presence of the reference allele by obtaining raw nucleotide counts from corresponding BAM files using BEDTools (36). Variant calls with an SNP allele frequency of <90% were marked as heterozygous and subsequently used to classify samples as mixed infections containing more than one parasite genotype.

RESULTS

Design of a protocol for amplicon sequencing of P. falciparum drug resistance genes.

We developed a high-throughput protocol for multiplexed amplicon sequencing of a panel of six P. falciparum genes from clinical isolates. We chose genes associated with different types of antimalarial drug resistance in P. falciparum, as follows: (i) mutations in the propeller domain of the kelch gene Pfk13 are associated with slow clearance of parasites in patients treated with ACT and confer resistance to artemisinin in vitro; (ii) mutations in the folate biosynthesis pathway enzymes dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthetase (Pfdhps) are associated with resistance to the antifolates sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine; (iii) mutations in transporters in the digestive vacuole of malaria parasites, including the chloroquine resistance transporter (Pfcrt) and multidrug resistance protein-1 (Pfmdr1) are major determinants of chloroquine resistance; and (iv) mutations in the parasite plasma membrane ABC transporter (Pfmrp1) are also associated with resistance to multiple antimalarial drugs in P. falciparum. Single primer pairs were designed to amplify almost the entire coding regions (2 to 3 kb) of Pfk13, Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, and Pfdhps, whereas Pfmdr1 and Pfmrp1 each required two sets of primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). We developed a two-step PCR protocol (see Materials and Methods) to amplify all loci simultaneously from a single patient sample, as well as an amplicon sequencing protocol optimized using DNA from several P. falciparum laboratory reference strains (Table 1). The reference strains were chosen because they have been studied extensively and exhibit well-characterized polymorphisms and drug resistance phenotypes, and they are available from the Malaria Reference and Reagent Resource Center (MR4). The protocol was designed such that amplicons from a single sample could be pooled and purified in a single tube, fragmented, and barcoded to allow multiplexing of six genes from several samples in a single NGS run. Upon testing and validating the protocol using 12 P. falciparum reference strains, we established its use for genotyping of field isolates by amplicon sequencing of 16 P. falciparum clinical samples obtained from patients at Ispat General Hospital in Raurkela, in the state of Odisha, India (Table 1).

Sequencing data overview and validation.

We designed the protocol for multiplexed sequencing of amplicons on an Ion Torrent PGM (Fig. 1) using 200-bp read chemistry and the 318 Chip. We obtained >2.5 million usable reads from a single run, with roughly 92,000 reads per sample and a mean read length of 168 bp (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). All data were aligned against the P. falciparum 3D7 strain, with an average alignment rate of 95.5% and a mean depth of coverage of >700× for each sample (the cumulative length of the target genes was 20 kb). Coverage plots depicting read depth across the length of each target gene revealed comparable read distribution between P. falciparum reference strains (Fig. 2A) and clinical isolates (Fig. 2B), indicating that there was no sequencing bias associated with the clinical samples. The depth of coverage was comparable across all target genes, except the Pfcrt gene, most likely due to the presence of 12 high-AT homopolymer-rich introns in this gene, which are prone to sequencing errors. Variant calling and filtration generated a total of 342 high-quality coding SNPs (see Table S4 in the supplemental material) and 209 noncoding SNPs in the 28 P. falciparum samples. In order to validate that our method was able to reliably detect known variations, we compared the data with previously characterized mutations for the 12 P. falciparum reference strains in the data set. In the absence of reported variants at selected positions, we confirmed the presence of the reference allele by analyzing the raw data. Our results showed 100% concordance with previously published data for all laboratory reference strains. Along with the mutations identified at key positions associated with drug resistance, the genes exhibited additional substitutions. The 39 additional SNPs (32 nonsynonymous and 7 synonymous) were distributed across the six amplicons as follows: two in Pfk13, two in Pfdhps, three in Pfdhfr, nine in Pfmrp1, 11 in Pfcrt, and 12 in Pfmdr1 (see Table S5 in the supplemental material). SNP haplotypes were deduced from key resistance-associated alleles in the six target genes for the 12 reference strains and 16 clinical samples from India (Table 2). The implications of the important resistance mutations and haplotypes identified in our data set are described in the context of each drug with which they are associated.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Experimental workflow used in this study, from sample collection and processing, library preparation, amplicon sequencing, and subsequent data analysis.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Sequencing coverage of drug resistance genes in P. falciparum reference strains and clinical isolates. Plots show sequencing read depth (x axis) across the amplicon length (y axis) for each of the six drug resistance genes. (A) A total of 12 P. falciparum reference strains from MR4 are shown, with each line corresponding to a particular reference strain shown in the key on the left. (B) A total of 16 P. falciparum clinical isolates from Raurkela, India, are shown, with each line corresponding to a particular clinical isolate shown in the key on the left.

TABLE 2.

Summary of SNPs implicated in drug resistance from six P. falciparum genes, Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps, Pfmdr1, Pfmrp1, and Pfk13 in 12 reference strains and 16 clinical isolates from Indiaa

Strain or isolate Amino acid(s) at key position in indicated gene (with amino acid for P. falciparum 3D7 indicated below codon no.)
Pfcrt
Pfdhfr
Pfdhps
Pfmdr1
Pfmrp1
Pfk13
72 C 73 V 74 M 75 N 76 K 16 A 51 N 59 C 108 S 164 I 436 S 437 G 540 K 581 A 613 A 86 N 184 Y 1034 S 1042 N 1246 D 191 H 437 S 876 I 1390 F 1466 K 493 Y 539 R 543 I 580 C
Reference strain
    NF54 E C V M N K A N C S I S G K A A N Y S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    D6 C V M N K A N C S I A A K A A N Y S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    D10 C V M N K A N C S I S A K A A N Y S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    HB3 C V M N K A N C N I S A K A A N F S D D H S I F K Y R I C
    Dd2 C V I E T A I R N I F G K A S F/Y Y S N D Y A V I K Y R I C
    FCB C V I E T V N C T I S A K A A Y Y S N D Y A V I K Y R I C
    GB4 C V I E T A N C S I S G K A A Y F S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    K1 C V I E T A N R N I S G K G A Y Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    TM91C235 C V I E T A I R N L A G E A A N F S N D Y A V I K Y R I C
    V1/S C V I E T A I R N L F G K A T Y Y S N D Y A V I K Y R I C
    W2 C V I E T A I R N I F G K A S Y Y S N D Y A V I K Y R I C
    7G8 S V M N T A I C N I S G K A A N F C D Y H S I F K Y R I C
Clinical isolates
    RKL9610 C V M N K A N R N I S A K A A N F S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    RKL10551 C V I E T A N R N I S A K A A N Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL10868 C V M N K A N C S I S A K A A N Y S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    RKL12330b C V I E T A N C/R S/N I S A K A A N Y/F S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL50072 C V M N K A N R N I S A K A A N F S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    RKL50617 C V I E T A N C S I S A K A A N Y S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    RKL58812b C V M N K A N C/R S/N I S A K A A N F S N D H/Y S/A I F K Y R I C
    RKL58925 C V M N K A N C/R S/N I S A K A A Y Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL59175 C V M N K A N C/R S/N I S A K A A N Y/F S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    RKL59290 C V I E T A N C S I S A K A A N Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL59796 C V I E T A N R N I S A K A A N Y S N D H S I F K Y R I C
    RKL60303 C V I E T A N C S I S A K A A Y Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL60308 C V M N K A N C S I S A K A A Y Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL60355b C V I E T A N C/R S/N I S A K A A N Y/F S N D H/Y S/A I/V F K Y R I C
    RKL61495 C V M N K A N R N I S A K A A N F S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
    RKL64249 C V M N K A N C S I S A K A A N Y S N D Y A V F K Y R I C
a

The P. falciparum 3D7 genome was used as a reference, and predicted amino acid substitutions at key positions implicated in drug resistance are highlighted in bold.

b

Samples that are proposed to be multiclonal infections based on the frequency of heterozygous variants.

ACT.

Sequence polymorphisms in the Pfk13, Pfmdr1, and Pfmrp1 genes have been found to play a role in ACT resistance. Artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) comprises a combination of artemisinin-derived compounds, such as artesunate or artemether, with other longer-acting antimalarials to limit selection of parasites resistant to either drug (37). It was discovered recently that mutations in the propeller domain of the kelch protein PfK13 are associated with resistance to artemisinin derivatives in field isolates (38), and they are also able to confer in vitro resistance to artemisinin, albeit in specific genetic backgrounds (39). Amino acid substitutions in PfK13, including C580Y, Y493H, and R539T, among others (40), have been shown to correlate with slow clearance of parasites in patients treated with ACT in field isolates from Cambodia (38). Another Pfk13 mutation, M476I, was identified in laboratory strains that acquired artemisinin resistance when subjected to drug pressure (38). A past survey of 384 samples across India identified four nonsynonymous SNPs in the propeller regions of the Pfk13 gene, namely, G533A, S549Y, R561H, and A578S (41). We did not identify these or any other nonsynonymous SNPs in the K13 propeller domain of 16 P. falciparum clinical isolates from Raurkela. The K189T substitution, which lies outside the propeller domain, was detected in three MR4 strains (HB3, GB4, and D6) and three clinical isolates (RKL58812, RKL61495, and RKL50617). This substitution is widely prevalent in African artemisinin-sensitive isolates (4244) and has also been seen in South Asian isolates (45). Only one synonymous SNP, L119L, was found in the isolate RKL60303. Based on their genotype, all the clinical isolates in our study are sensitive to artemisinin.

Artesunate (AS) is partnered with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), called AS-SP, in most regions in India, except the northeastern region, where artemether is paired with lumefantrine (AL) due to widespread resistance against SP (31). The wild-type alleles of Pfmdr1 coding for the amino acids N86 and D1246 are associated with resistance to AL (46, 47). The N86F184D1246 haplotype associated with AL treatment failure (48) was observed in seven clinical isolates and two reference strains, HB3 and TM91C235. The triple-mutant Pfmdr1 allele encoding the substitutions C1034D1042Y1246, which confer increased sensitivity to artemisinin in vitro (49), was absent in all samples, except the 7G8 reference strain. In the case of Pfmrp1, all 16 clinical isolates and seven of the reference strains showed the F1390 allelic variant that is associated with decreased in vitro susceptibility to artemisinin, mefloquine, and lumefantrine (50). The amino acid substitution I876V in Pfmrp1, which was previously reported in recrudescent infections in East Africa following AL treatment (51), was present in nine clinical isolates.

SP.

Sequence polymorphisms in the Pfdhfr, Pfdhps, and Pfmrp1 genes have been found to play a role in SP resistance. Resistance to pyrimethamine (PYR) is most strongly associated with the S108N substitution in Pfdhfr (52, 53), which reduces the binding of PYR to the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) protein. Additional amino acid substitutions at C59R, N51I, and I164L further increase resistance to PYR (54). The triple mutant A16I51R59N108I164 and quadruple mutant A16I51R59N108L164 confer the highest level of resistance to PYR. These were detected in the PYR-resistant reference strains Dd2, TM91C235, V1/S, and W2. Five clinical isolates from Raurkela contain double mutants resulting in the A16N51R59N108I164 haplotype, which is similar to the PYR-resistant K1 strain. Six isolates possess the wild-type A16N51C59S108I164 haplotype, as seen in the PYR-sensitive NF54 strain. The remaining five isolates have two allelic variants at the Pfdhfr locus, as depicted in Table 2. Five key substitutions in Pfdhps, A437G, S436A, K540E, A581G, and A613T (55, 56), have been proposed to reduce the binding of the PfDHPS protein to its inhibitor sulfadoxine (SUL). The reference strain 3D7 has a single substitution, A437G, conferring moderate resistance to SUL (57). All 16 clinical isolates possess the SUL-sensitive S436A437K540A581A613 haplotype, observed in the reference strains D10, HB3, and FCB. The Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genotypes together indicate that all the clinical isolates are likely to be sensitive to SP chemotherapy. None of the clinical isolates contain the K1466R substitution in Pfmrp1, which has been proposed to increase sensitivity to SP by promoting the efflux of antifolates from the cell (58).

CQ.

Sequence polymorphisms in the Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 genes have been found to play a role in CQ resistance. Resistance to CQ is a result of key mutations in Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 that reduce the accumulation of CQ in the parasite digestive vacuole (59, 60). The K76T substitution in Pfcrt is strongly associated with in vitro and in vivo resistance to CQ and is usually accompanied by additional mutations at amino acid positions 72 to 75, 97, 220, 271, 326, 356, and 371 (6163). The K76T substitution was observed in seven of the clinical isolates as part of the C72V73I74E75T76 haplotype that is also present in a majority of the CQ-resistant reference strains. Nine clinical isolates had the C72V73M74N75K76 haplotype present in the CQ-sensitive strains NF54 E, D6, D10, and HB3. Interestingly, the most prevalent haplotype in India is the CQ-resistant S72V73M74N75T76 haplotype (64). However, its frequency varies from the western regions of the country (where it is fixed in the population) to the eastern regions, which are adjacent to Southeast Asian countries, such as Myanmar (65, 66). The S72V73M74N75T76 haplotype was not detected in any of the samples except the 7G8 reference strain from Brazil. Mutations causing substitutions in Pfmdr1 codons 86, 184, 1034, 1042, and 1246 are linked with increased resistance to CQ (59, 67). The CQ-sensitive Pfmdr1 haplotype N86Y184S1034N1042D1246 was detected in six of the clinical isolates and three reference strains, NF54 E, D6, and D10. Four clinical isolates possessed a single substitution, Y184F, similar to that observed in TM91C235, while three clinical isolates had two allelic variants at the Y184 position. Three clinical isolates had the CQ resistance-conferring N86Y substitution, similar to the K1, V1/S, and W2 reference strains. The H191Y substitution in PfMRP1, associated with increased susceptibility to CQ (68), was seen in eight of the 16 clinical isolates and two isolates that also had the wild-type H191 allelic variant.

Using heterozygous variants for identification of mixed genotypes within samples.

The depth of sequence coverage generated by the Ion Torrent PGM should theoretically enable the identification of mixed-genotype populations within samples. Indeed, during data analysis, we detected two variants, N86Y (36%) and N86F (64%), at Pfmdr1 codon 86 in our Dd2 sample obtained from MR4. The N86F variant has been reported in field isolates from Africa and Afghanistan (69, 70), as well as the South Asian reference isolate Dd2 (11, 71). It appears that the two allelic variants observed in our Dd2 sample represent two copies of Pfmdr1, which have been observed in previous studies (11). Interestingly, the copy number variation of Pfmdr1 has been implicated in reduced sensitivity to antimalarial drugs, such as CQ, mefloquine, and lumefantrine (7274). This finding encouraged us to use heterozygous variant calls for the identification of multiclonal infections in the clinical isolates. Samples were ranked based on the total number of high-quality heterozygous SNPs (Fig. 3A). As might be expected due to a loss of diversity during in vitro culture adaptation, heterozygous SNPs were not detected in most of the P. falciparum reference strains. Four of the clinical isolates also did not exhibit any heterozygous variants, indicating the presence of a single parasitic clone in these isolates. On the other hand, the number of heterozygous SNPs in three of the samples, RKL12330, RKL58812, and RKL60355, was more than twice the median value observed in the entire data set (Fig. 3A). Further analysis of key drug resistance mutations with heterozygous variant calls revealed that the proportion of the reference and alternate allele was consistent across the various SNPs for three samples (Fig. 3B). Therefore, we classified three of the clinical isolates as multiclonal infections, comprising a mixture of genotypes with various drug susceptibilities. These results demonstrate the potential of the amplicon sequencing method to estimate the complexity of infection in P. falciparum clinical isolates. Although we only used high-quality heterozygous variants (allele frequency, >10%) for the purpose of this analysis, we should be able to improve the limit of detection of our NGS approach to identify rare variants (<1%) while accounting for sequencing errors and other technical artifacts.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Estimation of mixed genotypes using heterozygous variant calls. (A) Plot showing number of high-quality heterozygous variant calls (y axis) for each P. falciparum sample (x axis). Isolates on the left of the vertical dotted line, which represents twice the median number of heterozygous variants observed in the entire data set, were classified as potential multiclonal infections. (B) Box plots representing the proportion of the two allelic variants (shaded or dotted) observed in heterozygous SNPs associated with drug resistance in samples RKL12330, RKL58812, and RKL60355, which were classified as multiclonal infections in the plot in panel A.

DISCUSSION

Malaria continues to be challenging to eradicate, in part because P. falciparum parasites have developed resistance to nearly every antimalarial drug developed (75, 76). After its introduction in 1934, chloroquine (CQ) was successfully used to treat malaria cases worldwide until the 1950s, when CQ-resistant P. falciparum arose in Southeast Asia and South America and eventually spread to India in the 1970s. Although its use against P. falciparum was discontinued, CQ remained the first-line treatment for P. vivax malaria in India (31). P. falciparum also developed resistance to subsequent antimalarial treatments involving combinations of antifolates, sulfadoxine, and pyrimethamine. Artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) was introduced in India in 2005, and artemisinin (ART) derivatives proved to be the most effective drugs developed against P. falciparum. However, in 2008, ART resistance was identified for the first time in Cambodia (77, 78) and has spread and arisen independently in other parts of Southeast Asia since then (79). The recent identification of mutations in the kelch propeller domain of the Pfk13 gene as key causal determinants of artemisinin resistance have provided the opportunity for real-time surveillance of the emergence and spread of ART resistance in regions that are endemic for malaria. The detection of multiple Pfk13 mutations associated with delayed parasite clearance in Myanmar (80), which shares a border with Northeast India, has raised the alarm for the spread of ART resistance to India, similar to the suspected trajectory of CQ- and SP-resistant parasites. So far, Pfk13 surveillance studies in India have not yet detected any evidence for ART resistance in the country (41, 81). The success of ACT relies on the continued efficacy of ART and its partner drugs and is crucial for malaria control in India.

In order to address the pressing need to strengthen malaria surveillance, we have proposed here a next-generation amplicon sequencing method to enable high-throughput detection of genetic mutations in six P. falciparum genes associated with antimalarial drug resistance in India. The method can be easily adapted to include other candidate genes depending on the malaria treatment regimen used across different regions that are endemic for the disease. While most traditional surveillance methods focus on the detection of a limited number of known polymorphisms, our method involves sequencing the entire gene, which facilitates the discovery of novel polymorphisms involved in drug resistance. For example, the novel mutation (C350R) in Pfcrt, causing a reversal of CQ resistance conferred by the SVMNT haplotype in P. falciparum parasites from French Guiana, would have not been identified if only a limited number of SNPs had been analyzed (82). Moreover, as multiple genes can be associated with resistance to a single drug, the simultaneous analysis of these genes will improve our knowledge of the possible combinatorial effects of multiple mutations on parasite drug resistance. By monitoring the molecular markers of resistance for all drugs administered in a particular region, changes to treatment policy can be implemented to contain the spread of drug resistance. This is particularly relevant in the context of reintroducing old drugs in areas where previously resistant parasites have reverted to carrying drug-susceptible alleles in the prolonged absence of drug pressure, as recently observed in Malawi with the return of the CQ-sensitive wild-type Pfcrt allele in the population a decade after CQ withdrawal (83). We also demonstrated the potential of amplicon sequencing to discriminate between single and multiclonal infections. As malaria parasite infections can consist of more than one parasite clone, the presence of both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant parasites within a single patient may occur. We plan to study the variation in within-host diversity in response to chemotherapy by obtaining patient samples before and after drug treatment, so as to track changes in the frequency of individual alleles identified in multiclonal infections. Analysis of the amplicon sequencing results in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological data associated with the patient isolates can help us decipher the impact of the complexity of infection on drug susceptibility or disease phenotype.

As proof of principle, we applied the method to 28 P. falciparum samples at a cost of $95 per patient, but the technology can allow multiplexing of up to 96 samples in a single run, significantly reducing the cost to approximately $73 per patient sample ($14 for DNA extraction and generation of the amplicon pool, and $59 for library preparation and sequencing). The use of the Ion Torrent platform makes our technique particularly suitable in countries endemic for malaria that have limited computational infrastructure and lack of advanced training in bioinformatics, as the instrument comes equipped with a suite of data analysis tools for read alignment, coverage, and variant detection that can be operated with minimum information technology expertise. As patient blood samples can be collected, transported, and stored for a long time without the need for in vitro culture, national malaria control programs could implement large-scale amplicon sequencing studies that are not feasible using in vivo and in vitro assays. As part of the National Institutes of Health-funded International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research initiative, we have set up the Ion Torrent PGM platform at the National Institute for Malaria Research in Delhi for in-house sequencing of Plasmodium samples (24). We are currently using this method for multiplexed sequencing of clinical isolates collected from epidemiologically diverse sites in India (84).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Tara Rock and Theresa Ten Eyck at the NYU Genomics Core for technical assistance, and MR4 for providing malaria parasite strains. We also thank the director in charge and the clinical staff of Ispat General Hospital in Raurkela for their support and dedication, as well as the director of the Institute of Life Sciences in Bhubaneswar for allowing us to use the Infectious Disease Biology Unit in Raurkela.

This paper bears the NIMR Publication Screening Committee approval no. 011/2016.

The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award U19AI089676 as part of the International Centers for Excellence in Malaria Research.

The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00235-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO/UNICEF. 2015. Achieving the malaria MDG target: reversing the incidence of malaria 2000–2015. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/184521/1/9789241509442_eng.pdf?ua=1. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. 2015. India drives down malaria rates, sets sights on elimination. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/features/2015/india-programme-end-malaria/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abdul-Ghani R, Al-Maktari MT, Al-Shibani LA, Allam AF. 2014. A better resolution for integrating methods for monitoring Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial drugs. Acta Trop 137:44–57. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Duraisingh MT, Curtis J, Warhurst DC. 1998. Plasmodium falciparum: detection of polymorphisms in the dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthetase genes by PCR and restriction digestion. Exp Parasitol 89:1–8. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Durand R, Eslahpazire J, Jafari S, Delabre JF, Marmorat-Khuong A, di Piazza JP, Le Bras J. 2000. Use of molecular beacons to detect an antifolate resistance-associated mutation in Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:3461–3464. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3461-3464.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wilson PE, Alker AP, Meshnick SR. 2005. Real-time PCR methods for monitoring antimalarial drug resistance. Trends Parasitol 21:278–283. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2005.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alker AP, Mwapasa V, Purfield A, Rogerson SJ, Molyneux ME, Kamwendo DD, Tadesse E, Chaluluka E, Meshnick SR. 2005. Mutations associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chlorproguanil resistance in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Blantyre, Malawi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3919–3921. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3919-3921.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ranford-Cartwright LC, Johnston KL, Abdel-Muhsin AM, Khan BK, Babiker HA. 2002. Critical comparison of molecular genotyping methods for detection of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96:568–572. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90446-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nair S, Brockman A, Paiphun L, Nosten F, Anderson TJC. 2002. Rapid genotyping of loci involved in antifolate drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum by primer extension. Int J Parasitol 32:852–858. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cruz RE, Shokoples SE, Manage DP, Yanow SK. 2010. High-throughput genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the Plasmodium falciparum dhfr gene by asymmetric PCR and melt-curve analysis. J Clin Microbiol 48:3081–3087. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00634-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daniels R, Ndiaye D, Wall M, McKinney J, Séne PD, Sabeti PC, Volkman SK, Mboup S, Wirth DF. 2012. Rapid, field-deployable method for genotyping and discovery of drug-resistance single nucleotide polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2976–2986. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05737-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daniels R, Volkman SK, Milner DA, Mahesh N, Neafsey DE, Park DJ, Rosen D, Angelino E, Sabeti PC, Wirth DF, Wiegand RC. 2008. A general SNP-based molecular barcode for Plasmodium falciparum identification and tracking. Malar J 7:223. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Campino S, Auburn S, Kivinen K, Zongo I, Ouedraogo J-B, Mangano V, Djimde A, Doumbo OK, Kiara SM, Nzila A, Borrmann S, Marsh K, Michon P, Mueller I, Siba P, Jiang H, Su X-Z, Amaratunga C, Socheat D, Fairhurst RM, Imwong M, Anderson T, Nosten F, White NJ, Gwilliam R, Deloukas P, MacInnis B, Newbold CI, Rockett K, Clark TG, Kwiatkowski DP. 2011. Population genetic analysis of Plasmodium falciparum parasites using a customized Illumina GoldenGate genotyping assay. PLoS One 6:e20251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kamau E, Alemayehu S, Feghali KC, Tolbert LS, Ogutu B, Ockenhouse CF. 2012. Development of a TaqMan allelic discrimination assay for detection of single nucleotides polymorphisms associated with anti-malarial drug resistance. Malaria J 11:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ali IM, Evehe M-SB, Netongo PM, Atogho-Tiedeu B, Akindeh-Nji M, Ngora H, Domkam IK, Diakite M, Baldip K, Ranford-Cartwright L, Mimche PN, Lamb T, Mbacham WF. 2014. Host candidate gene polymorphisms and associated clearance of P. falciparum amodiaquine and fansidar resistance mutants in children less than 5 years in Cameroon. Pathog Glob Health 108:323–333. doi: 10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nankoberanyi S, Mbogo GW, LeClair NP, Conrad MD, Tumwebaze P, Tukwasibwe S, Kamya MR, Tappero J, Nsobya SL, Rosenthal PJ. 2014. Validation of the ligase detection reaction fluorescent microsphere assay for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum resistance mediating polymorphisms in Uganda. Malar J 13:95. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aydin-Schmidt B, Xu W, González IJ, Polley SD, Bell D, Shakely D, Msellem MI, Björkman A, Mårtensson A. 2014. Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) accurately detects malaria DNA from filter paper blood samples of low density parasitaemias. PLoS One 9:e103905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu L, Li Y, Li S, Hu N, He Y, Pong R, Lin D, Lu L, Law M. 2012. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:251364. doi: 10.1155/2012/251364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ, Constantinidou C, Gharbia SE, Wain J, Pallen MJ. 2012. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nat Biotechnol 30:434–439. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quail MA, Smith M, Coupland P, Otto TD, Harris SR, Connor TR, Bertoni A, Swerdlow HP, Gu Y. 2012. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 13:341. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li X, Buckton AJ, Wilkinson SL, John S, Walsh R, Novotny T, Valaskova I, Gupta M, Game L, Barton PJR, Cook SA, Ware JS. 2013. Towards clinical molecular diagnosis of inherited cardiac conditions: a comparison of bench-top genome DNA sequencers. PLoS One 8:e67744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McElroy K, Thomas T, Luciani F. 2014. Deep sequencing of evolving pathogen populations: applications, errors, and bioinformatic solutions. Microb Inform Exp 4:1. doi: 10.1186/2042-5783-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frickmann H, Masanta WO, Zautner AE. 2014. Emerging rapid resistance testing methods for clinical microbiology laboratories and their potential impact on patient management. BioMed Res Int 2014:375681. doi: 10.1155/2014/375681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carlton JM, Volkman SK, Uplekar S, Hupalo DN, Pereira Alves JM, Cui L, Donnelly M, Roos DS, Harb OS, Acosta M, Read A, Ribolla PE, Singh OP, Valecha N, Wassmer SC, Ferreira M, Escalante AA. 2015. Population genetics, evolutionary genomics, and genome-wide studies of malaria: a view across the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93:87–98. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bailey JA, Mvalo T, Aragam N, Weiser M, Congdon S, Kamwendo D, Martinson F, Hoffman I, Meshnick SR, Juliano JJ. 2012. Use of massively parallel pyrosequencing to evaluate the diversity of and selection on Plasmodium falciparum csp T-cell epitopes in Lilongwe, Malawi. J Infect Dis 206:580–587. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mideo N, Kennedy DA, Carlton JM, Bailey JA, Juliano JJ, Read AF. 2013. Ahead of the curve: next generation estimators of drug resistance in malaria infections. Trends Parasitol 29:321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin JT, Hathaway NJ, Saunders DL, Lon C, Balasubramanian S, Kharabora O, Gosi P, Sriwichai S, Kartchner L, Chuor CM, Satharath P, Lanteri C, Bailey JA, Juliano JJ. 2015. Using amplicon deep sequencing to detect genetic signatures of Plasmodium vivax relapse. J Infect Dis 212:999–1008. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Daum LT, Rodriguez JD, Worthy SA, Ismail NA, Omar SV, Dreyer AW, Fourie PB, Hoosen AA, Chambers JP, Fischer GW. 2012. Next-generation Ion Torrent sequencing of drug resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains. 50:3831–3837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daum LT, Fourie PB, Bhattacharyya S, Ismail NA, Gradus S, Maningi NE, Omar SV, Fischer GW. 2014. Next-generation sequencing for identifying pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 58:903–904. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Das A, Anvikar AR, Cator LJ, Dhiman RC, Eapen A, Mishra N, Nagpal BN, Nanda N, Raghavendra K, Read AF, Sharma SK, Singh OP, Singh V, Sinnis P, Srivastava HC, Sullivan SA, Sutton PL, Thomas MB, Carlton JM, Valecha N. 2012. Malaria in India: the center for the study of complex malaria in India. Acta Trop 121:267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anvikar AR, Arora U, Sonal G, Mishra N, Shahi B, Savargaonkar D, Kumar N, Shah NK, Valecha N. 2014. Antimalarial drug policy in India: past, present & future. Indian J Med Res 139:205–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG. 2012. Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40:e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bahl A, Brunk B, Crabtree J, Fraunholz MJ, Gajria B, Grant GR, Ginsburg H, Gupta D, Kissinger JC, Labo P, Li L, Mailman MD, Milgram AJ, Pearson DS, Roos DS, Schug J, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Whetzel P. 2003. PlasmoDB: the Plasmodium genome resource. A database integrating experimental and computational data. Nucleic Acids Res 31:212–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL. 2012. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Su XZ, Wu Y, Sifri CD, Wellems TE. 1996. Reduced extension temperatures required for PCR amplification of extremely A+T-rich DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 24:1574–1575. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.8.1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.White N. 1999. Antimalarial drug resistance and combination chemotherapy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:739–749. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, Kim S, Duru V, Bouchier C, Ma L, Lim P, Leang R, Duong S, Sreng S, Suon S, Chuor CM, Bout DM, Ménard S, Rogers WO, Genton B, Fandeur T, Miotto O, Ringwald P, Le Bras J, Berry A, Barale JC, Fairhurst RM, Benoit-Vical F, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Ménard D. 2014. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 505:50–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Duru V, Ramadani AP, Dacheux M, Khim N, Zhang L, Lam S, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Benoit-Vical F, Fairhurst RM, Menard D, Fidock DA. 2015. Drug resistance. K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Science 347:428–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.WHO. 2015. Status report on artemisinin and ACT resistance: September 2015. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/status-rep-artemisinin-act-resistance-sept2015.pdf?ua=1. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mishra N, Prajapati SK, Kaitholia K, Bharti RS, Srivastava B, Phookan S, Anvikar AR, Dev V, Sonal GS, Dhariwal AC, White NJ, Valecha N. 2015. Surveillance of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in India using the kelch13 molecular marker. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:2548–2553. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04632-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ocholla H, Preston MD, Mipando M, Jensen AT, Campino S, MacInnis B, Alcock D, Terlouw A, Zongo I, Oudraogo JB, Djimde AA, Assefa S, Doumbo OK, Borrmann S, Nzila A, Marsh K, Fairhurst RM, Nosten F, Anderson TJ, Kwiatkowski DP, Craig A, Clark TG, Montgomery J. 2014. Whole-genome scans provide evidence of adaptive evolution in Malawian Plasmodium falciparum isolates. J Infect Dis 210:1991–2000. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Torrentino-Madamet M, Fall B, Benoit N, Camara C, Amalvict R, Fall M, Dionne P, Ba Fall K, Nakoulima A, Diatta B, Diemé Y, Ménard D, Wade B, Pradines B. 2014. Limited polymorphisms in k13 gene in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Dakar, Senegal in 2012–2013. Malar J 13:472. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Boussaroque A, Fall B, Madamet M, Camara C, Benoit N, Fall M, Nakoulima A, Dionne P, Fall KB, Diatta B, Diémé Y, Wade B, Pradines B. 2015. Emergence of Mutations in the K13 propeller gene of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Dakar, Senegal, in 2013–2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:624–627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang Z, Shrestha S, Li X, Miao J, Yuan L, Cabrera M, Grube C, Yang Z, Cui L. 2015. Prevalence of K13-propeller polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum from China-Myanmar border in 2007–2012. Malar J 14:168. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0672-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sisowath C, Strömberg J, Mårtensson A, Msellem M, Obondo C, Björkman A, Gil JP. 2005. In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem). J Infect Dis 191:1014–1017. doi: 10.1086/427997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Venkatesan M, Gadalla NB, Stepniewska K, Dahal P, Nsanzabana C, Moriera C, Price RN, Mårtensson A, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G, Sutherland CJ, Guérin P, Davis TM, Ménard D, Adam I, Ademowo G, Arze C, Baliraine FN, Berens-Riha N, Bjorkman A, Borrmann S, Checchi F, Desai M, Dhorda M, Djimde AA, El-Sayed BB, Eshetu T, Eyase F, Falade C, Faucher JF, Fröberg G, Grivoyannis A, Hamour S, Houze S, Johnson J, Kamugisha E, Kariuki S, Kiechel JR, Kironde F, Kofoed PE, LeBras J, Malmberg M, Mwai L, Ngasala B, Nosten F, Nsobya SL, Nzila A, Oguike M, Otienoburu SD, Ogutu B, et al. . 2014. Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter and multidrug resistance 1 genes: parasite risk factors that affect treatment outcomes for P. falciparum malaria after artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg 91:833–843. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Happi CT, Gbotosho GO, Folarin OA, Sowunmi A, Hudson T, O'Neil M, Milhous W, Wirth DF, Oduola AM. 2009. Selection of Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 alleles in asexual stages and gametocytes by artemether-lumefantrine in Nigerian children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:888–895. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00968-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sidhu AB, Valderramos SG, Fidock DA. 2005. pfmdr1 mutations contribute to quinine resistance and enhance mefloquine and artemisinin sensitivity in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Microbiol 57:913–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Veiga MI, Ferreira PE, Jörnhagen L, Malmberg M, Kone A, Schmidt BA, Petzold M, Björkman A, Nosten F, Gil JP. 2011. Novel polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum ABC transporter genes are associated with major ACT antimalarial drug resistance. PLoS One 6:e20212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dahlström S, Ferreira PE, Veiga MI, Sedighi N, Wiklund L, Mårtensson A, Färnert A, Sisowath C, Osório L, Darban H, Andersson B, Kaneko A, Conseil G, Björkman A, Gil JP. 2009. Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance protein 1 and artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa. J Infect Dis 200:1456–1464. doi: 10.1086/606009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cowman AF, Morry MJ, Biggs BA, Cross GA, Foote SJ. 1988. Amino acid changes linked to pyrimethamine resistance in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:9109–9113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Peterson DS, Walliker D, Wellems TE. 1988. Evidence that a point mutation in dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase confers resistance to pyrimethamine in falciparum malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:9114–9118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gregson A, Plowe CV. 2005. Mechanisms of resistance of malaria parasites to antifolates. Pharmacol Rev 57:117–145. doi: 10.1124/pr.57.1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Triglia T, Menting JG, Wilson C, Cowman AF. 1997. Mutations in dihydropteroate synthase are responsible for sulfone and sulfonamide resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:13944–13949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang P, Read M, Sims PF, Hyde JE. 1997. Sulfadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. Mol Microbiol 23:979–986. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2821646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Triglia T, Wang P, Sims PF, Hyde JE, Cowman AF. 1998. Allelic exchange at the endogenous genomic locus in Plasmodium falciparum proves the role of dihydropteroate synthase in sulfadoxine-resistant malaria. EMBO J 17:3807–3815. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.3807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dahlström S, Veiga MI, Mårtensson A, Björkman A, Gil JP. 2009. Polymorphism in PfMRP1 (Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance protein 1) amino acid 1466 associated with resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2553–2556. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00091-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Reed MB, Saliba KJ, Caruana SR, Kirk K, Cowman AF. 2000. Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 403:906–909. doi: 10.1038/35002615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sidhu AB, Verdier-Pinard D, Fidock DA. 2002. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites conferred by pfcrt mutations. Science 298:210–213. doi: 10.1126/science.1074045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fidock DA, Nomura T, Talley AK, Cooper RA, Dzekunov SM, Ferdig MT, Ursos LM, Sidhu AB, Naudé B, Deitsch KW, Su XZ, Wootton JC, Roepe PD, Wellems TE. 2000. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol Cell 6:861–871. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00077-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Djimdé A, Doumbo OK, Steketee RW, Plowe CV. 2001. Application of a molecular marker for surveillance of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. Lancet 358:890–891. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06040-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cooper RA, Ferdig MT, Su XZ, Ursos LM, Mu J, Nomura T, Fujioka H, Fidock DA, Roepe PD, Wellems TE. 2002. Alternative mutations at position 76 of the vacuolar transmembrane protein PfCRT are associated with chloroquine resistance and unique stereospecific quinine and quinidine responses in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Pharmacol 61:35–42. doi: 10.1124/mol.61.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vathsala PG, Pramanik A, Dhanasekaran S, Devi CU, Pillai CR, Subbarao SK, Ghosh SK, Tiwari SN, Sathyanarayan TS, Deshpande PR, Mishra GC, Ranjit MR, Dash AP, Rangarajan PN, Padmanaban G. 2004. Widespread occurrence of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (Pfcrt) gene haplotype SVMNT in P. falciparum malaria in India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70:256–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mallick PK, Sutton PL, Singh R, Singh OP, Dash AP, Singh AK, Carlton JM, Bhasin VK. 2013. Microsatellite analysis of chloroquine resistance associated alleles and neutral loci reveal genetic structure of Indian Plasmodium falciparum. Infect Genet Evol 19:164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mallick PK, Joshi H, Valecha N, Sharma SK, Eapen A, Bhatt RM, Srivastava HC, Sutton PL, Dash AP, Bhasin VK. 2012. Mutant pfcrt “SVMNT” haplotype and wild type pfmdr1 “N86” are endemic in Plasmodium vivax dominated areas of India under high chloroquine exposure. Malar J 11:16. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Foote SJ, Kyle DE, Martin RK, Oduola AM, Forsyth K, Kemp DJ, Cowman AF. 1990. Several alleles of the multidrug-resistance gene are closely linked to chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 345:255–258. doi: 10.1038/345255a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Phompradit P, Muhamad P, Wisedpanichkij R, Chaijaroenkul W, Na-Bangchang K. 2014. Four years' monitoring of in vitro sensitivity and candidate molecular markers of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate-mefloquine combination in the Thai-Myanmar border. Malar J 13:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Beshir K, Sutherland CJ, Merinopoulos I, Durrani N, Leslie T, Rowland M, Hallett RL. 2010. Amodiaquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Afghanistan is associated with the pfcrt SVMNT allele at codons 72 to 76. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3714–3716. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00358-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Dlamini SV, Beshir K, Sutherland CJ. 2010. Markers of anti-malarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Swaziland: identification of pfmdr1-86F in natural parasite isolates. Malar J 9:68. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chugh M, Scheurer C, Sax S, Bilsland E, van Schalkwyk DA, Wicht KJ, Hofmann N, Sharma A, Bashyam S, Singh S, Oliver SG, Egan TJ, Malhotra P, Sutherland CJ, Beck HP, Wittlin S, Spangenberg T, Ding XC. 2015. Identification and deconvolution of cross-resistance signals from antimalarial compounds using multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1110–1118. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03265-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Foote SJ, Thompson JK, Cowman AF, Kemp DJ. 1989. Amplification of the multidrug resistance gene in some chloroquine-resistant isolates of P. falciparum. Cell 57:921–930. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90330-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wilson CM, Volkman SK, Thaithong S, Martin RK, Kyle DE, Milhous WK, Wirth DF. 1993. Amplification of pfmdr 1 associated with mefloquine and halofantrine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Thailand. Mol Biochem Parasitol 57:151–160. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90252-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sidhu AB, Uhlemann AC, Valderramos SG, Valderramos JC, Krishna S, Fidock DA. 2006. Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in Plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J Infect Dis 194:528–535. doi: 10.1086/507115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Petersen I, Eastman R, Lanzer M. 2011. Drug-resistant malaria: molecular mechanisms and implications for public health. FEBS Lett 585:1551–1562. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sibley CH. 2014. Understanding drug resistance in malaria parasites: basic science for public health. Mol Biochem Parasitol 195:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Lwin KM, Ariey F, Hanpithakpong W, Lee SJ, Ringwald P, Silamut K, Imwong M, Chotivanich K, Lim P, Herdman T, An SS, Yeung S, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, Lindegardh N, Socheat D, White NJ. 2009. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 361:455–467. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM, Artemisinin Resistance in Cambodia 1 (ARC1) Study Consortium. 2008. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med 359:2619–2620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0805011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Anderson JM, Mao S, Sam B, Sopha C, Chuor CM, Nguon C, Sovannaroth S, Pukrittayakamee S, Jittamala P, Chotivanich K, Chutasmit K, Suchatsoonthorn C, Runcharoen R, Hien TT, Thuy-Nhien NT, Thanh NV, Phu NH, Htut Y, Han KT, Aye KH, Mokuolu OA, Olaosebikan RR, Folaranmi OO, Mayxay M, Khanthavong M, Hongvanthong B, Newton PN, Onyamboko MA, Fanello CI, Tshefu AK, Mishra N, Valecha N, Phyo AP, Nosten F, Yi P, Tripura R, Borrmann S, Bashraheil M, Peshu J, Faiz MA, Ghose A, Hossain MA, Samad R, et al. . 2014. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 371:411–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tun KM, Imwong M, Lwin KM, Win AA, Hlaing TM, Hlaing T, Lin K, Kyaw MP, Plewes K, Faiz MA, Dhorda M, Cheah PY, Pukrittayakamee S, Ashley EA, Anderson TJ, Nair S, McDew-White M, Flegg JA, Grist EP, Guerin P, Maude RJ, Smithuis F, Dondorp AM, Day NP, Nosten F, White NJ, Woodrow CJ. 2015. Spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Myanmar: a cross-sectional survey of the K13 molecular marker. Lancet Infect Dis 15:415–421. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70032-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chatterjee M, Ganguly S, Saha P, Bankura B, Basu N, Das M, Guha SK, Maji AK. 2015. No polymorphism in Plasmodium falciparum K13 propeller gene in clinical isolates from Kolkata, India. J Pathog 2015:374354. doi: 10.1155/2015/374354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pelleau S, Moss EL, Dhingra SK, Volney B, Casteras J, Gabryszewski SJ, Volkman SK, Wirth DF, Legrand E, Fidock DA, Neafsey DE, Musset L. 2015. Adaptive evolution of malaria parasites in French Guiana: reversal of chloroquine resistance by acquisition of a mutation in pfcrt. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11672–11677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507142112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kublin JG, Cortese JF, Njunju EM, Mukadam RA, Wirima JJ, Kazembe PN, Djimdé AA, Kouriba B, Taylor TE, Plowe CV. 2003. Reemergence of chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum malaria after cessation of chloroquine use in Malawi. J Infect Dis 187:1870–1875. doi: 10.1086/375419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Moss WJ, Dorsey G, Mueller I, Laufer MK, Krogstad DJ, Vinetz JM, Guzman M, Rosas-Aguirre AM, Herrera S, Arevalo-Herrera M, Chery L, Kumar A, Mohapatra PK, Ramanathapuram L, Srivastava HC, Cui L, Zhou G, Parker DM, Nankabirwa J, Kazura JW, International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research. 2015. Malaria epidemiology and control within the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93:5–15. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ding XC, Ubben D, Wells TN. 2012. A framework for assessing the risk of resistance for anti-malarials in development. Malar J 11:292. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Riel MA, Kyle DE, Bhattacharjee AK, Milhous WK. 2002. Efficacy of proton pump inhibitor drugs against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro and their probable pharmacophores. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2627–2632. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2627-2632.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wilson DW, Fowkes FJ, Gilson PR, Elliott SR, Tavul L, Michon P, Dabod E, Siba PM, Mueller I, Crabb BS, Beeson JG. 2011. Quantifying the importance of MSP1-19 as a target of growth-inhibitory and protective antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum in humans. PLoS One 6:e27705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sa JM, Twu O, Hayton K, Reyes S, Fay MP, Ringwald P, Wellems TE. 2009. Geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance distinguished by differential responses to amodiaquine and chloroquine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:18883–18889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911317106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES