Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2016 May 23;60(6):3845–3848. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00214-16

Novel Cytomegalovirus UL54 DNA Polymerase Gene Mutations Selected In Vitro That Confer Brincidofovir Resistance

Sunwen Chou a,b,, Ronald J Ercolani b, E Randall Lanier c
PMCID: PMC4879386  PMID: 27044553

Abstract

Eight in vitro selection experiments under brincidofovir pressure elicited the known cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase amino acid substitutions N408K and V812L and the novel exonuclease domain substitutions D413Y, E303D, and E303G, which conferred ganciclovir and cidofovir resistance with 6- to 11-fold resistance to brincidofovir or 17-fold when E303G was combined with V812L. The new exonuclease domain I resistance mutations selected under brincidofovir pressure add to the single instance previously reported and show the expected patterns of cross-resistance.

TEXT

Brincidofovir (BCV or CMX001, Chimerix) is an experimental orally bioavailable hexadecyloxypropyl conjugate of the nucleotide analog cidofovir (CDV) (1). A phase 3 clinical trial of BCV for the prevention of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in bone marrow transplant recipients (ClinicalTrials registration no. NCT01769170) was recently completed, and BCV unexpectedly failed to meet its primary efficacy endpoint despite showing a statistically significant antiviral effect during the on-treatment phase (2). These results and those of a prior successful phase 2 trial (3) showed that short-term prophylactic use of BCV did not result in the detection of CMV UL54 DNA polymerase gene mutations conferring drug resistance (4). The genetic pathways and biochemical mechanisms of resistance to BCV are expected to be the same as those of the parent compound CDV (5), into which BCV is metabolized prior to formation of the active antiviral CDP diphosphate (CDV-PP). Intracellular levels of CDV-PP differ markedly after exposure to CDV or BCV (6), as reflected in the much lower BCV concentrations (0.2 to 0.5 nM for BCV versus 200 nM for CDV) required to reduce CMV replication by 50% in cell culture (50% effective concentration [EC50]). In vitro exposure to BCV may select for mutations different from those previously reported for CDV or ganciclovir (GCV), as higher intracellular active drug concentrations may select for mutants with higher associated levels of drug resistance at the cost of reduced growth fitness. In one report, the UL54 exonuclease domain III amino acid substitution D542E (7) was detected after many cell culture passages under BCV and shown to confer cross-resistance to CDV but not to GCV or foscarnet (FOS). Eight additional in vitro selection experiments under BCV are reported here with characterization of the resistance and relative growth phenotypes of the emergent mutations.

The reference BCV compound was provided by Chimerix and added to the human fibroblast cultures starting with 0.2 nM BCV for all experiments after CMV inoculation at a low multiplicity of infection (MOI), followed by weekly propagation under increasing drug concentrations as permitted by interim viral growth, as previously described (8). We commonly use an error-prone UL54 exonuclease mutant (e.g., D413del, strain T4138) to accelerate the evolution of resistance mutations, but this mutant is already resistant to BCV, CDV, and GCV (Table 1), with EC50s ∼5-fold increased over those for the parental wild-type strain T3265 (8, 9), raising the possibility that additional mutations on this genetic background may not represent evolution in the wild-type virus. Therefore, only 2 selection experiments were performed using the D413del mutant, and 6 others were done with wild-type CMV derived from strain AD169 (BAC clone BD1) (8). Selection cultures were monitored for evolving UL54 mutations by standard dideoxy sequencing as described previously (8), with complete (1,243 codons) UL54 sequences at the end of the experiment and partial (codons 296 to 1,000) sequences at interim sampling points. Amino acid substitutions were defined in relation to the strain AD169 reference sequence.

TABLE 1.

Genotypes and phenotypes of recombinant viruses

Strain Genotype Brincidofovir
Cidofovir
Ganciclovir
Foscarnet
EC50 (nM)a SD nb Ratioc EC50 (nM) SD n Ratio EC50 (nM) SD n Ratio EC50 (nM) SD n Ratio
Control strains
    T4198 Wild-type control 0.37 0.13 13 0.19 0.05 17 1.1 0.21 17 61 13 29
    T4138 UL54 pol D413del 1.3 0.49 7 5.2 1.4 0.52 10 5.8 4.0 1.0 8 3.8 66 17 8 1.3
    T4199 UL54 pol A809V 264 43 26 4.3
Mutants selected under BCV
    T4302 UL54 pol E303G 4.2 0.82 10 11 3.7 1.2 11 20 8.3 2.4 8 7.3 46 6.4 11 0.8
    T4303 UL54 pol E303D 3.6 0.77 11 9.7 2.9 0.92 8 16 7.2 1.7 10 6.3 50 13 9 0.8
    T4221 UL54 pol N408K 4.2 0.55 11 11 3.8 1.6 10 21 4.4 0.79 8 3.9 51 17 11 0.8
    T4267 UL54 pol D413Y 2.2 0.42 9 6.0 1.8 0.65 8 9.3 5.0 1.3 7 4.4 61 14 7 1.0
    T4309 UL54 pol V812L 0.88 0.31 13 2.4 0.58 0.19 8 3.1 2.4 0.69 8 2.1 119 30 12 2.0
    T4307 UL54 pol E303G V812L 6.3 0.81 11 17 6.4 1.6 10 34 11.6 1.9 10 10 83 17 13 1.4
a

EC50, mean drug concentration required to reduce culture supernatant secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) growth by 50%.

b

Number of assay replicates (done over at least 4 separate dates).

c

Ratio of the EC50 of the mutant virus to that of the matching wild-type control.

Of the two selection experiments with the D413del mutant, one evolved no further detectable UL54 mutations after 20 passages and an ending concentration of 4 nM; attempts to escalate the drug concentrations resulted in progressively deteriorating viral growth. The other culture evolved amino acid substitution N408K after escalation to a BCV concentration of 12 nM at 25 passages. N408K is a well-known resistance marker that confers relatively high-level CDV resistance (∼20-fold) and GCV cross-resistance (∼4-fold) (9). A new N408K recombinant virus (T4221) was constructed on the clone BD1 base to reconfirm the twice previously published CDV, GCV, and FOS susceptibility phenotypes (Table 1) and to document the BCV EC50 at an 11-fold increase over baseline.

Of the six selection experiments with wild-type CMV, only 3 evolved any detectable UL54 mutation after 20 serial passages. Those that evolved no mutation could not maintain ongoing viral growth at BCV concentrations of >2 nM. One experiment evolved substitution D413Y as an ∼20% subpopulation at 6 passages (0.8 nM BCV); this evolved to a full population of D413Y in 2 further passages at the same drug concentration. Another experiment evolved substitution E303D, detected at 19 passages (3 nM BCV) and as a fully mutant population 1 passage later. A third experiment evolved substitution E303G (70% mutant sequence) after 13 passages (20 nM BCV). After 7 more passages at the same BCV concentration, an additional substitution V812L (90% mutant sequence) was observed, adding to the fully mutant E303G sequence. V812L was originally identified and characterized 20 years ago as conferring multidrug resistance, including resistance to CDV (10).

Recombinant phenotyping for the newly recognized substitutions D413Y, E303D, and E303G was performed by transfer of individual mutations to the clone BD1 base as previously described (8, 9). E303G was also phenotyped in combination with V812L as observed in the selection experiment, along with the V812L single mutant for comparison. Recombinant viruses were sequence verified and alkaline phosphatase reporter-based yield reduction assays were performed with the replicates, and the results are shown in Table 1, indicating BCV-CDV-GCV cross-resistance for E303D, E303G, and D413Y. V812L had a borderline or low-grade resistant CDV-GCV-FOS phenotype as originally published (10) and augmented the BCV-CDV resistance conferred by E303G as predicted by its evolution in vitro. Interestingly the FOS EC50 of the double mutant was lower than that for V812L alone.

Comparative growth curves were obtained for the mutant recombinant viruses as described previously (8, 9) and are shown in Fig. 1. The E303 and D413 mutants were moderately growth attenuated, comparable to the established FOS resistance substitution A809V, while the N408K and V812L mutants had relatively well-preserved growth fitness close to that of the wild type.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Comparative secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) growth curves of recombinant CMV strains. The mutant strains as listed in Table 1 with the indicated UL54 pol amino acid substitutions were inoculated at a similar low MOI of ∼0.02 as calibrated by mean 24-h supernatant SEAP relative light units (RLU) of 1,313 (range, 1,133 to 1,559). Viral growth was monitored by SEAP RLU at 4 to 8 days postinoculation. The points represent the means ± SD of 4 replicates. A known growth-attenuated FOS-resistant mutant, A809V, found in clinical isolates (5) was included for comparison.

The novel UL54 substitutions E303D/G and D413Y reported here add to the considerable number of exonuclease domain mutations associated with dual CDV and GCV resistance (5, 11, 12). The only other drug resistance mutation that has been mapped to CMV exonuclease domain I (codons 300 to 304) is substitution D301N, identified in a single plaque of a clinical isolate picked under GCV (13). That the new instances of domain I mutation involve residue E303 is significant, as both D301 and E303 are highly conserved residues among herpesvirus DNA polymerases (14). Substitution D413Y confers a drug resistance phenotype similar to those for D413A (15), D413E (13), and D413N (11), all involving another highly conserved exonuclease domain II residue, D413 (14). Together, the three acidic residues D301, E303, and D413 correspond to herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase residues D368, E370, and D471, which crystal structure analysis associates with acidic residues of bacteriophage RB69 DNA polymerase that are involved in the metal ion coordination essential for normal exonuclease activity (14, 16).

Modulation of exonuclease function appears to be the preferred mechanism of BCV/CDV and GCV resistance based on DNA polymerase mutations (5). A recent biochemical study suggests that altered exonuclease function may overcome the dynamic stalling of DNA polymerization (rapid addition and removal of subsequent nucleotides) that occurs when a nonobligate chain terminator nucleotide analog is misincorporated into a growing DNA strand (17). Some exonuclease mutants, such as N408K, have well-preserved growth fitness (Fig. 1 and reference 9), probably accounting for their relatively higher frequency in clinical samples (18), while other exonuclease domain mutants such as D301N (13) and E303G/D are more growth impaired, comparable to polymerase (palm/finger) domain mutants E756K (9, 13) and A809V (Fig. 1).

The emergence of a finger domain substitution, V812L, to augment the level of CDV and GCV resistance conferred by exonuclease substitution E303G has functional and therapeutic implications. V812L was previously described after in vitro selection under GCV (10, 19) and in a clinical isolate after GCV and FOS therapy (20). The initial recombinant phenotyping of V812L showed a low-grade (2.5- to 3-fold) increased EC50 for GCV, CDV, and FOS (10). Although a more recent study did not confirm the FOS-resistant phenotype (19), the current data (Table 1) are consistent with the initial report and the general tendency of mutations in this functional domain to confer variable degrees of FOS resistance and low-grade cross-resistance to GCV and CDV (5). This phenotype probably results from altered substrate recognition during polymerization of the incoming base into replicating DNA, based on the structural locus of residue 812 (16). The difference in functional domains plausibly allows for the increased BCV, CDV, and GCV resistance of double mutants such as E303G-V812L (Table 1). The specific example of V812L also shows that GCV and BCV can independently select for the same cross-resistant mutation. In this series of experiments we did not detect mutations in the conserved exonuclease III domain (codons 498 to 546) where several CDV-GCV resistance mutations have been mapped (5), as well as the D542E substitution associated with impaired growth and BCV resistance without GCV cross-resistance (7).

To date, reported in vitro selection experiments with CDV (10) or BCV (7), including the current set, have been relatively few in number but have not conveyed the impression of rapid emergence of resistant mutants. Instead, drug resistance as a risk factor for early treatment failure with CDV or BCV may arise mainly from prior exposure to other antivirals, especially GCV, that select for cross-resistant UL54 mutants, as illustrated by clinical case reports of CDV or BCV as salvage therapy (11, 21, 22).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Gail Marousek provided technical assistance.

Funding Statement

This work, including the efforts of Sunwen Chou and Ronald J. Ercolani, was funded by HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (AI116635) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Painter W, Robertson A, Trost LC, Godkin S, Lampert B, Painter G. 2012. First pharmacokinetic and safety study in humans of the novel lipid antiviral conjugate CMX001, a broad-spectrum oral drug active against double-stranded DNA viruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2726–2734. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05983-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marty FM, Winston DJ, Chemaly RF, Boeckh MJ, Mullane KM, Shore TB, Papanicolaou GA, Morrison ME, Brundage TM, Mommeja-Marin H. 2016. Brincidofovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in CMV-seropositive patients. BMT Tandem Meet, Honolulu, HI, 20 February 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marty FM, Winston DJ, Rowley SD, Vance E, Papanicolaou GA, Mullane KM, Brundage TM, Robertson AT, Godkin S, Mommeja-Marin H, Boeckh M. 2013. CMX001 to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 369:1227–1236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lanier ER, Foster S, Brundage T, Chou S, Prichard MN, Kleiboeker S, Wilson C, Colville D, Mommeja-Marin H. 3 March 2016. Analysis of mutations in the gene encoding cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase in a phase 2 clinical trial of brincidofovir prophylaxis. J Infect Dis. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lurain NS, Chou S. 2010. Antiviral drug resistance of human cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:689–712. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00009-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aldern KA, Ciesla SL, Winegarden KL, Hostetler KY. 2003. Increased antiviral activity of 1-O-hexadecyloxypropyl-[2-14C]cidofovir in MRC-5 human lung fibroblasts is explained by unique cellular uptake and metabolism. Mol Pharmacol 63:678–681. doi: 10.1124/mol.63.3.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.James SH, Price NB, Hartline CB, Lanier ER, Prichard MN. 2013. Selection and recombinant phenotyping of a novel CMX001 and cidofovir resistance mutation in human cytomegalovirus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3321–3325. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00062-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chou S. 2015. Rapid in vitro evolution of human cytomegalovirus UL56 mutations that confer letermovir resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6588–6593. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01623-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chou S. 2011. Phenotypic diversity of cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase gene variants observed after antiviral therapy. J Clin Virol 50:287–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cihlar T, Fuller MD, Mulato AS, Cherrington JM. 1998. A point mutation in the human cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase gene selected in vitro by cidofovir confers a slow replication phenotype in cell culture. Virology 248:382–393. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chou S, Ercolani RJ, Sahoo MK, Lefterova MI, Strasfeld LM, Pinsky BA. 2014. Improved detection of emerging drug-resistant mutant cytomegalovirus subpopulations by deep sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4697–4702. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03214-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Komatsu TE, Pikis A, Naeger LK, Harrington PR. 2014. Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to ganciclovir/valganciclovir: a comprehensive review of putative resistance pathways. Antiviral Res 101:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chou S, Lurain NS, Thompson KD, Miner RC, Drew WL. 2003. Viral DNA polymerase mutations associated with drug resistance in human cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis 188:32–39. doi: 10.1086/375743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bennett N, Gotte M. 2013. Utility of the bacteriophage RB69 polymerase gp43 as a surrogate enzyme for herpesvirus orthologs. Viruses 5:54–86. doi: 10.3390/v5010054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chou S, Marousek GI. 2008. Accelerated evolution of maribavir resistance in a cytomegalovirus exonuclease domain II mutant. J Virol 82:246–253. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01787-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu S, Knafels JD, Chang JS, Waszak GA, Baldwin ET, Deibel MR Jr, Thomsen DR, Homa FL, Wells PA, Tory MC, Poorman RA, Gao H, Qiu X, Seddon AP. 2006. Crystal structure of the herpes simplex virus 1 DNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 281:18193–18200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602414200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen H, Beardsley GP, Coen DM. 2014. Mechanism of ganciclovir-induced chain termination revealed by resistant viral polymerase mutants with reduced exonuclease activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:17462–17467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405981111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kleiboeker S, Nutt J, Schindel B, Dannehl J, Hester J. 2014. Cytomegalovirus antiviral resistance: characterization of results from clinical specimens. Transpl Infect Dis 16:561–567. doi: 10.1111/tid.12241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gilbert C, Azzi A, Goyette N, Lin SX, Boivin G. 2011. Recombinant phenotyping of cytomegalovirus UL54 mutations that emerged during cell passages in the presence of either ganciclovir or foscarnet. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4019–4027. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00334-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cherrington JM, Fuller MD, Lamy PD, Miner R, Lalezari JP, Nuessle S, Drew WL. 1998. In vitro antiviral susceptibilities of isolates from cytomegalovirus retinitis patients receiving first- or second-line cidofovir therapy: relationship to clinical outcome. J Infect Dis 178:1821–1825. doi: 10.1086/314487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kaul DR, Stoelben S, Cober E, Ojo T, Sandusky E, Lischka P, Zimmermann H, Rubsamen-Schaeff H. 2011. First report of successful treatment of multidrug-resistant cytomegalovirus disease with the novel anti-CMV compound AIC246. Am J Transplant 11:1079–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strasfeld L, Lee I, Villano S, Chou S. 2010. Virologic characterization of multi-drug-resistant cytomegalovirus infection in two transplant recipients treated with maribavir. J Infect Dis 202:104–108. doi: 10.1086/653122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES