Abstract
E. coli is the most common Gram-negative bacillary organism causing meningitis and E. coli meningitis continues to be an important cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world. Our incomplete knowledge of its pathogenesis contributes to such mortality and morbidity. Recent reports of E. coli strains producing CTX-M-type or TEM-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases create a challenge. Studies using in vitro and in vivo models of the blood-brain barrier have shown that E. coli meningitis follows a high-degree of bacteremia and invasion of the blood-brain barrier. E. coli invasion of the blood-brain barrier, the essentials step in the development of E. coli meningitis, requires specific microbial and host factors as well as microbe- and host-specific signaling molecules. Blockade of such microbial and host factors contributing to E. coli invasion of the blood-brain barrier is shown to be efficient in preventing E. coli penetration into the brain. The basis for requiring a high-degree of bacteremia for E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier, however, remains unclear. Continued investigation on the microbial and host factors contributing to a high-degree of bacteremia and E. coli invasion of the blood-brain barrier is likely to identify new targets for prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis.
INTRODUCTION
Gram-negative bacillary meningitis continues to be an important cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world despite advances in antimicrobial chemotherapy and supportive care. Case fatality rates have ranged between 15 and 40%, and approximately 50% of the survivors sustain neurological sequelae (1-10). Both clinical and experimental data indicate limited efficacy with antimicrobial chemotherapy alone (11, 12). A major contributing factor to such mortality and morbidity is our incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease.
E. coli is the most common Gram-negative bacillary organism that causes meningitis, in particular during the neonatal period. Most cases of E. coli meningitis develop as a result of hematogenous spread (13, 14), but it is incompletely understood how circulating E. coli traverses the blood-brain barrier. Given the plethora of E. coli serotypes, it is striking that E. coli strains possessing the K1 capsular polysaccharide are predominant (approximately 80%) among isolates from neonatal E. coli meningitis (15-17), and most of these K1 isolates are associated with a limited number of O serotypes (e.g., O18, O7, O16, O1, O45) (14, 18-20). The basis of this association of K1 and certain O antigens with E. coli meningitis remains unclear.
The development of both in vitro and in vivo models of the blood-brain barrier has facilitated the current understanding of the microbial penetration of the blood-brain barrier, a key step for the development of E. coli meningitis. Meningitis-causing pathogens cross the blood-brain barrier transcellularly, paracellularly, and/or by means of infected phagocytic cells (“Trojan horse” mechanism) (21-25), and this review describes the microbial and host factors contributing to E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier.
THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER
The blood-brain barrier is a structural and functional barrier that is formed by brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs), astrocytes and pericytes. It regulates the passage of molecules into and out of the brain to maintain the neural microenvironment. BMECs possess distinct features such as tight junctions between them and low rates of pinocytosis (25, 26). The blood-brain barrier protects the brain from microbes and toxins circulating in the blood, and astrocytes and pericytes help maintain the barrier property of BMEC. Recent studies, however, have shown that meningitis-causing E. coli traverses the blood-brain barrier as live organisms and cause intracranial inflammation, resulting in meningitis (7, 21-28). The contributions of astrocytes and pericytes to E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier are shown to be minimal. The in vitro blood-brain barrier model has been developed with human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs). Upon cultivation on collagen-coated Transwell inserts these HBMECs exhibit morphologic and functional properties of tight junction formation as well as a polar monolayer. These are shown by the demonstrations of tight junction proteins (such as claudin 5 and ZO-1) and adherens junction proteins (such as VE-cadherin and β-catenin) and their spatial separation, limited transendothelial permeability to inulin (molecular weight, 4,000) and dextran (molecular weight, 70,000), and development of high transendothelial electrical resistance (29-32). Studies with transmission electron microscopy demonstrate that meningitis-causing E. coli invades HBMECs and internalized bacteria are found within membrane-bound vacuoles of HBMECs (Fig. 1) and transmigrate through HBMECs via an enclosed vacuole without intracellular multiplication and without any change in the integrity of HBMEC monolayers (20, 30, 33). No free bacteria are found in the cytoplasm of HBMECs or between adjacent HBMECs.
Experimental hematogenous meningitis models have been developed in infant rats and mice for assessing the role of the blood-brain barrier in microbial penetration into the brain in vivo. In this animal model, E. coli is injected via intravenous, intracardiac or subcutaneous administration, resulting in bacteremia and subsequent entry into the brain (14, 34-41), which mimics the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis in humans. Studies in these hematogenous meningitis models indicate that the primary site of entry into the brain for circulating E. coli is the cerebral microvessels, not the choroid plexus (14).
As indicated above, meningitis-causing pathogens exhibit the ability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier, the essential step in the development of central nervous system infection, and their penetration of the blood–brain barrier occurs transcellularly, paracellularly, or by means of infected phagocytes (so-called Trojan-horse mechanism) (21-25). Transcellular traversal refers to microbial penetration through barrier cells without any demonstration of organisms between the cells or any evidence of intercellular tight junction disruption. Paracellular traversal is defined as microbial penetration between barrier cells with and/or without evidence of tight junction disruption. The Trojan-horse mechanism involves microbial penetration of the barrier cells via transmigration within infected phagocytes. E. coli penetration into the brain was documented without accompanying host inflammatory cells (e.g., polymorphonuclear leukocytes, macrophages) (14), and E. coli entry into the brain was shown to occur without any change in the blood-brain barrier permeability (42). In addition, E. coli transmigrate through HBMECs via an enclosed vacuole without any change in the integrity of HBMEC monolayers (21, 30, 33), and no free bacteria are found in the cytoplasm of HBMECs or between adjacent HBMECs. These findings indicate that initial entry of E. coli into the brain is less likely to involve paracellular penetration of the blood-brain barrier and/or the Trojan horse mechanism via transmigration of E. coli-infected phagocytic cells. Taken together, meningitis-causing E. coli traverses the blood-brain barrier using a transcellular mechanism without altering the blood-brain barrier permeability.
E. COLI PENETRATION OF THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER
Studies using the above-mentioned in vitro and in vivo models of the blood-brain barrier have revealed that successful crossing of the blood-brain barrier by circulating E. coli requires (a) a high degree of bacteremia, (b) E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC, and (c) traversal of the blood-brain barrier as live bacteria (21-25, 27, 43) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Mechanism | E. coli factors |
---|---|
1. A high-degree of bacteremia | K1, O-LPS, NlpI, AVF, SslE |
2. E. coli binding to HBMECs | FimH, HbiC, FliC, OmpA, NlpI |
3. E. coli invasion of HBMECs | IbeA, IbeB, IbeC, AslA, CNF1 |
4. E. coli traversal of the blood-brain barrier as live bacteria | K1 |
A HIGH DEGREE OF BACTEREMIA REQUIRED FOR E. COLI PENETRATION INTO THE BRAIN
Several studies of E. coli meningitis in humans and experimental animals point to a relationship between the magnitude of bacteremia and the development of meningitis. For example, a significantly higher incidence of E. coli meningitis was noted in neonates who had bacterial counts in blood higher than 103 colony forming units (CFUs)/ml (6 of 11 or 55%), compared to those with blood bacterial counts lower than 103 CFUs/ml (1 of 19 or 5%) (13). A high degree of bacteremia was also shown to be a primary determinant for penetration into the brain by circulating E. coli in neonatal and adult animals with experimental hematogenous E. coli meningitis (14, 34-38), but an approximately 106-fold greater inoculum of E. coli is required to induce a similar high-level bacteremia in adult animals compared to neonatal animals (14).
These findings suggest that the age dependency of E. coli meningitis is most likely due to the relative resistance of adults to high-level bacteremia, which precedes the development of meningitis, and less likely due to greater invasion of meningitis-causing E. coli in HBMECs derived from neonates compared to those from adults. This concept is supported by the demonstration that the abilities of meningitis-causing E. coli to bind and invade BMEC are similar between BMEC derived from young and old rats as well as HBMEC derived from different ages (44). Thus, one of the reasons for the close association of meningitis-causing E. coli strains with neonatal meningitis is their ability to escape from host defenses and then to achieve a threshold level of bacteremia necessary for invasion of the blood-brain barrier. Taken together, these findings indicate (a) that a high-degree of bacteremia is required for meningitis-causing E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier, and (b) that the prevention of bacterial multiplication in the blood that is required for penetration into the brain would be one potential approach for prevention of E. coli meningitis. The basis for requiring a high-degree of bacteremia for penetration into the brain, however, remains unclear
Previous studies have identified that the expression of K1 capsular polysaccharide and O-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are shown to be critical for induction of a high degree of bacteremia (14, 45, 46), but the feasibility of using the K1 capsule and O-LPS for the prevention of E. coli bacteremia has been shown to be limited (19, 47-49). Recent functional E. coli genomic studies identified several E. coli factors that are shown to contribute to bacteremia (21, 43, 50, 51). For example, NlpI, named after new lipoprotein I, has been shown to contribute to a high-level E. coli bacteremeia (52). NlpI's evasion of serum-mediated killing is through regulation of the complement regulator C4bp deposition on the bacterial surface (53). Studies are in progress to determine the broadly conserved antigens or a multi-epitope subunit vaccine for the prevention of E. coli bacteremia and subsequent meningitis (50, 51, 54).
E. COLI BINDING TO AND INVASION OF HBMECs
Subsequent studies have shown that a high degree of bacteremia is necessary, but not sufficient for E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier in vivo, and that E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC is a prerequisite for penetration into the brain (34-38, 55). This was shown by the demonstration in infant rats with experimental hematogenous meningitis that isogenic mutants of meningitis-causing E. coli deleted of determinants contributing to HBMEC binding and invasion were significantly less able to induce meningitis than the parent strain despite having similar levels of bacteremia (Table 2). These findings indicate that those E. coli determinants contributing to HBMEC binding and invasion are necessary for penetration of the blood-brain barrier in vivo.
Table 2.
E. coli strain | No. of animals | Bacteremia (log10 CFU/ml blood) | No. of animals with meningitis (%) |
---|---|---|---|
RS 218 | 19 | 7.18 ± 0.63 | 12 (63) |
Δ ompA | 22 | 7.05 ± 0.49 | 6 (27)a |
RS 218 | 24 | 7.51 ± 1.25 | 16 (67) |
Δ ibe A | 25 | 6.97 ± 1.21 | 4 (16)a |
RS 218 | 27 | 7.01 ± 1.17 | 15 (56) |
Δ ibe B | 25 | 7.06 ± 1.29 | 4 (16)a |
RS 218 | 24 | 7.53 ± 0.40 | 18 (75) |
Δ ibeC | 24 | 7.80 ± 0.67 | 10 (42)a |
RS 218 | 17 | 7.50 ± 0.32 | 14 (82) |
Δ aslA | 22 | 7.60 ± 0.49 | 7 (32)a |
RS 218 | 26 | 7.64 ± 1.00 | 20 (77) |
Δ cnf1 | 27 | 7.24 ± 1.60 | 12 (44)a |
Significantly less than RS 218
Modified from (22)
E. COLI STRUCTURES AFFECTING HBMEC BINDING
Infections caused by pathogenic E. coli are often initiated by the binding of the bacteria to the host cell surface, and this concept is likely to be important for circulating E. coli to withstand the blood flow and cross the blood-brain barrier in vivo. Several E. coli determinants have been identified to be involved in HBMEC binding and subsequent invasion into HBMECs (52, 56-59). The roles of those E. coli structures in HBMEC binding have been verified by deletion and complementation experiments, as shown by the demonstration that isogenic deletion mutants were significantly less able to bind HBMECs and their binding abilities were restored to the levels of parent strain by complementation with wild type genes.
Fimbriae
Pathogenic E. coli express several types of fimbrial adhesins, which can be divided into different groups by their affinity to specific receptor structures such as α-d-mannosides (type 1 fimbrial adhesins), α-d-Gal-(1-4)-β-d-Gal (P fimbrial adhesins), and NeuAc α2,3-galactose (S fimbrial adhesins) (60). A study using E. coli DNA microarray examined the gene expression patterns of HBMEC-associated E. coli, which revealed that type 1 fimbriae play an important role in E. coli binding to HBMEC (59). The HBMEC-associated E. coli showed significantly higher expression levels of the fim cluster genes than the non-associated bacteria. Expression of type 1 fimbriae in wild-type E. coli is regulated by phase variation in which each bacterium can alternate between fimbriated and non-fimbriated states, so-called phase-ON and phase-OFF, respectively. E. coli associated with HBMECs are found to be predominantly type 1 fimbria phase-ON bacteria. To determine the role of type 1 fimbriae in E. coli binding to HBMEC without phase variation, the type 1 fimbria locked-ON and locked-OFF mutants of meningitis-causing E. coli were constructed, whose fim promoters are fixed in the ON and OFF orientation, respectively. The binding to HBMECs is found to be significantly greater with the locked-ON mutant than the wild-type strain, while it is significantly less with the locked-OFF mutant (59). Decreased binding as the result of the fimH deletion or the locked-OFF mutant resulted in decreased invasion into HBMECs.
From E. coli DNA microarray experiments, a novel site-specific recombinase, HbiF, was identified which inverted the molecular switch fimS independent of the two known recombinases, FimB and FimE, that invert fimS and control the expression of the downstream fim operon (61). Discovery of HbiF-mediated fimS switching provides a new opportunity for investigating the regulation of type 1 fimbriae expression, which will help in developing a novel strategy for the prevention and therapy of E. coli bacteremia and meningitis. FimH is shown to interact with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored receptor, CD48 on the surface of HBMEC, and FimH-CD48 interaction contributes to E. coli binding to HBMEC and increases in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) in HBMEC (56, 62). This concept is shown by the demonstration that CD48 antibody blocks FimH-mediated binding to HBMEC and FimH-induced [Ca2+]i changes in HBMEC.
S fimbriae, which bind to terminal NeuAc α2,3-galactose sequences present on glycoproteins and glycolipids containing terminal Gal(3SO4)β-1 residues, have been implicated in E. coli binding to HBMECs. This concept was shown by the demonstration that purified S fimbriae or a recombinant E. coli strain HB101 expressing S fimbriae was shown to bind to the luminal surfaces of the brain vascular endothelium in neonatal rat brain tissues (63). A previous study using S fimbriated transformants of E. coli strain HB101 also showed that S fimbriae allowed this laboratory E. coli strain to bind to HBMECs (64, 65), suggesting that S fimbriae play an important role in E. coli binding to HBMECs. However, in-frame deletion of the S fimbria operon in meningitis-causing E. coli did not significantly affect E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMECs and also did not affect E. coli penetration into the brain in the experimental hematogenous meningitis animal model (39). These findings indicate that S fimbriae are not critical in meningitis-causing E. coli binding to HBMECs in vitro and traversal of the blood-brain barrier in vivo.
Flagella
A study comparing the gene expression patterns of HBMEC-associated versus non-associated E. coli with E. coli DNA microarray demonstrated that flagella play an important role in E. coli binding to HBMECs (66, 67). This concept is supported by the demonstration (a) that the mutant deleted of fliC was significantly defective in binding to and invasion of HBMECs, and this defect was restored by complementation with wild type fliC, (b) that recombinant flagellin (FliC) binds directly to the surface of HBMECs and (c) that exogenous recombinant flagellin inhibits E. coli binding to HBMECs (66).
Outer membrane proteins
OmpA is one of the major outer membrane proteins in E. coli and its N-terminal domain crosses the outer membrane eight times in antiparallel β-strands with four hydrophilic surface-exposed loops and short periplasmic turns. Several studies have shown that the N-terminal portion of OmpA and its surface-exposed loops contribute to binding to HBMEC (57, 58, 68), and that OmpA interacts with HBMEC through N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues of gp 96 (69, 70). The chitooligomers (GlcNAc β1, 4-GlcNAc oligomers) and chitohexose block meningitis-causing E. coli invasion of HBMEC and traversal of the blood–brain barrier in the infant rat model of experimental hematogenous meningitis (68, 70). A recent study comparing the ompA deletion mutant with its parent E. coli strain RS218 using an E. coli DNA microarray, however, revealed that the ompA deletion mutant exhibited significantly lower expression of the fim cluster genes, and lower expression of type 1 fimbriae on the bacterial surface (71). These findings suggest that decreased binding of the ompA deletion mutant may be related to its lower expression of type 1 fimbriae. The ompA deletion mutant was significantly less efficient in its penetration into the brain in vivo compared to the parent E. coli strain (38). Additional studies are needed to determine whether these in vitro and in vivo defects of the ompA deletion mutant are in part related to its decreased expression of type 1 fimbriae and also understand how the deletion of ompA affects type 1 fimbria expression.
Lipoproteins
NlpI is shown to be an important factor of Crohn's disease-associated E. coli strain LF82 (083:H1) to interact with intestinal epithelial cells (72). Deletion of nlpI in E. coli strain LF82 decreased expression of type 1 fimbriae and flagella (72). NlpI is found to be an outer membrane-anchored protein and contributes to meningitis-causing E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC (52). Unlike strain LF82, deletion of nlpI in meningitis-causing E. coli, however, did not affect the expression of type 1 fimbriae, flagella and OmpA, indicating that the contribution of NlpI to HBMEC binding and invasion is independent of those bacterial factors in meningitis-causing E. coli. This concept is shown by the demonstration that mutants deleted of type 1 fimbriae, OmpA and NlpI exhibited significantly decreased HBMEC binding and invasion compared to mutants deleted of individual factors or a combination of the two factors (52). These findings suggest that type 1 fimbriae, OmpA and NlpI are likely to contribute to HBMEC binding and invasion independent of each other. It remains, however, incompletely understood how and why several bacterial factors of meningitis-causing E. coli are involved in HBMEC binding.
E. COLI STRUCTURES CONTRIBUTING TO INVASION OF HBMECs
Previous studies using TnphoA mutagenesis, signature-tagged mutagenesis, and differential fluorescence induction with screening of a gfp fusion library identified several E. coli determinants contributing to invasion of HBMECs, which include Ibe (named after invasion of brain endothelial cell) proteins and cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1) (34-36, 55, 73, 74). Mutants deleted of the above-mentioned invasion factors were significantly less invasive in HBMECs and less able to traverse the blood-brain barrier in vivo (Table 2), and their invasive abilities were restored to the levels of parent strain by complementation with wild type genes. Recombinant Ibe proteins inhibit E. coli invasion of HBMECs (34), suggesting that Ibe proteins contribute to HBMEC invasion by a ligand-receptor interaction. This concept was supported by the demonstration of a HBMEC surface protein interactive with IbeA, and a polyclonal antibody raised against this receptor protein inhibited E. coli invasion of HBMECs (25).
CNF1 is a bacterial virulence factor associated with pathogenic E. coli strains causing urinary tract infection and meningitis (75). CNF1 is an AB-type toxin, composed of the N-terminal cell binding domain and the C-terminal catalytic domain possessing a deaminase activity through the site-specific deamination of a Gln residue to Glu (76, 77). CNF1 has been shown to activate Rho GTPases and induce uptake of latex beads, bacteria, and apoptotic bodies into nonprofessional phagocytes such as epithelial and endothelial cells by macropinocytosis (78). CNF1 contributes to E. coli invasion of HBMECs in vitro and penetration into the brain in vivo, and these in vitro and in vivo effects of CNF1 depend on RhoA activation (55). This concept was shown by (a) decreased invasion and RhoA activation with the cnf1 deletion mutant in HBMEC and (b) restoration of the cnf1 mutant's invasion frequency to the level of the parent strain in HBMECs expressing constitutively active RhoA. CNF1 has been suggested to be internalized via receptor-mediated endocytosis upon binding to a cell surface receptor (75), but it is unclear how CNF1 enters the HBMEC and activates Rho GTPases. A yeast two-hybrid screening of the HBMEC cDNA library using the N-terminal cell binding domain of CNF1 as bait identified the HBMEC receptor for CNF1 (79). This receptor, 37-kDa laminin receptor precursor (LRP), interacted with the N-terminal CNF1 and full-length CNF1 but not with the C-terminal CNF1. CNF1-mediated RhoA activation and bacterial uptake were inhibited by exogenous LRP or LRP antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, whereas they were increased in LRP-overexpressing cells, demonstrating correlation between effects of CNF1 and levels of LRP expression in HBMEC (79). These findings indicate that CNF1 interaction with its receptor, 37-kDa LRP, is the initial step required for CNF1-mediated RhoA activation and bacterial uptake in eukaryotic cells. The 37-kDa LRP is a ribosome-associated cytoplasmic protein and shown to be a precursor of 67-kDa laminin receptor (LR). It is unclear how 67-kDa LR is matured and synthesized from the 37-kDa LRP, but mature 67-kDa LR is shown to be present on the cell surface and functions as a membrane receptor for the adhesive basement membrane protein laminin (80). CNF1-expressing E. coli has been shown to up-regulate 67-kDa LR expression on the surface of HBMEC and recruit 67-kDa LR to the site of invading E. coli in a CNF1-dependent manner (81). Increased expression of 67-kDa LR has been shown to be associated with invasive and metastatic properties of a variety of tumors (82), and it remains speculative whether CNF1-expressing E. coli has any role in malignant transformation of certain cancers. Although CNF1 is shown to interact with 37-kDa LRP/67-kDa LR on the cell surface of HBMEC, resulting in RhoA activation and increased internalization of CNF1-expressing E. coli, CNF1 is a bacterial cytoplasmic protein (83, 84), and it remains unclear how it is secreted into the outer membrane and interacts with 37-kDa LRP/67-kDa LR on the blood-brain barrier. Taken together, these findings indicate that meningitis-causing E. coli invades HBMECs through ligand-receptor interactions. Of interest, 37-kDa LRP/67-kDa LR has been shown to be a cellular target for various CNS-infecting microorganisms, including S pneumoniae, N meningitidis, H. influenzae type b, dengue virus, adeno-associated virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, and prion protein (7). The mechanism by which the same receptor is involved in CNS penetration by different organisms remains to be established.
E. COLI TRAVERSAL OF THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER AS LIVE BACTERIA
The ability of meningitis-causing pathogens to cross the blood-brain barrier as live bacteria is a critical factor for the development of meningitis. Meningitis-causing E. coli has been shown to traverse the blood-brain barrier without altering the integrity of the HBMEC monolayer and without affecting the blood-brain barrier permeability (30, 42). HBMECs have been shown to exhibit the complete trafficking machinery required to deliver the microbe-containing vacuoles to cathepsin D-containing components (i.e., lysosomes) (85). Vacuoles containing the E. coli K1 capsule deletion mutant interact sequentially with early endosomal marker proteins (e.g., early endosomal auto-antigen 1 and transferrin receptor) and late endosome and late endosome/lysosomal markers (e.g., Rab7 and lysosome-associated membrane proteins, respectively) and allow lysosomal fusion, with subsequent degradation of bacteria inside vacuoles. In contrast, vacuoles containing E. coli K1+ (E. coli with the K1 capsule) obtained early and late endosomes without fusion with lysosomes (85), thereby allowing E. coli K1 to cross the blood-brain barrier as live bacteria, indicating that E. coli K1 modulates intracellular trafficking to avoid lysosomal fusion in HBMECs. E. coli K1 capsule is well recognized for its serum resistance and antiphagocytic properties (14, 45, 46), which are the essence of inducing a high degree of bacteremia. Another novel property of the K1 capsule is to modulate the maturation process of E. coli K1+-containing vacuoles and prevent their fusion with lysosomes, which is an event necessary for traversal of the blood-brain barrier as live bacteria. Additional studies are needed to elucidate how the K1 capsule is able to modulate intracellular trafficking of E. coli K1+-containing vacuoles to avoid fusion with lysosomes in HBMECs and whether similar events occur with other meningitis-causing microbes.
THE PATHOGNESIS OF E. COLI MENINGITIS: CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY APPROACHES
Pathogenic microbes internalize into nonprofessional phagocytes such as epithelial and endothelial cells via exploiting various strategies affecting host cell actin cytoskeleton rearrangements (21, 25). Electron microscopy studies have shown that meningitis-causing E. coli invasion of HBMECs is associated with microvillus-like protrusions at the entry site on the surface of HBMECs (24, 33) (Fig. 1), suggesting the involvement of host cell actin cytoskeleton rearrangement in E. coli invasion of HBMECs. This concept is supported by the demonstrations that the F-actin condensation occurs with invading bacteria and blockade of actin condensation with microfilament-disrupting agents such as cytochalasin D inhibits E. coli invasion of HBMECs (33).
Several host cell signal transduction pathways have been shown to be involved in meningitis-causing E. coli invasion of HBMECs, most likely through their effects on host cell actin cytoskeleton rearrangements. These include focal adhesion kinase (FAK), paxillin, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Src kinase, signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3), Rho GTPases (RhoA and Rac1), cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α), 5-lipoxygenase and cysteinyl leukotrienes, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-1, ezrin, radixin and moesin (ERM), calmodulin-dependent myosin light-chain kinase, and protein kinase C (PKC) (7, 21, 40, 41, 52, 55, 68, 86-89) (Figure 2). The host–microbial factors exploiting such host cell signaling molecules for E. coli invasion of the blood-brain barrier, however, remain incompletely elucidated.
It is important to note that the above-mentioned host cell signaling molecules are shown to be activated in response to specific microbial factors of meningitis-causing E. coli and their interactions with HBMEC factors, and that participation of the same bacterial or host factors does not necessarily lead to activation of the same host cell signaling molecules. For example, FimH of meningitis-causing E. coli has been shown to induce RhoA activation, not FAK activation in HBMECs (56). In contrast, FimH of uropathogenic E. coli induces FAK activation in bladder epithelial cells (90). A similar concept is shown with host factors, e.g., gp96 functions as the receptor for E. coli OmpA and L. monocytogenes Vip. The OmpA–gp96 interaction resulted in FAK activation in HBMECs, but no FAK activation occurred with the Vip–gp96 interaction in mouse fibroblasts (21).
Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier has been facilitated by determination of the above-mentioned host cell signaling molecules contributing to E. coli invasion of HBMECs, as exemplified below, (a) identification of the E. coli factors contributing to activation of specific host cell signaling molecules and (b) examination of the interrelationship of the host cell signaling molecules for elucidating how different E. coli factors contribute to HBMEC invasion.
OmpA and IbeA proteins of meningitis-causing E. coli are shown to be involved in FAK and PI3K activations as well as in STAT3 and Rac1 activations, while FimH and CNF1 in RhoA activation, OmpA and NlpI in cPLA2α and PKCα activations, and CNF1 in ERM activation. This information has been useful for elucidating how several bacterial factors contribute to E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC. For example, Rac1 activation occurs in response to OmpA or IbeA, and RhoA activation occurs in response to CNF1 or FimH, while cPLA2α activation occurs in response to OmpA or NlpI (25, 52, 56, 69, 88). E. coli mutants deleted of OmpA and CNF1, OmpA and FimH, or FimH and NlpI exhibit significantly greater defects in invasion of HBMEC compared to individual deletion mutants. In contrast, mutants deleted of OmpA and IbeA are not shown to exhibit significantly greater defects in HBMEC invasion compared to individual deletion mutants. Thus, the reasons for the additive (non-redundant) versus indifferent (redundant) effects of different bacterial factors in E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC can be in part explained by their underlying host cell signaling mechanisms (e.g., involving different or same host cell signaling molecules, respectively).
In addition, meningitis-causing E. coli strains exploit FAK and PI3K for invasion of HBMEC, as shown by significantly decreased invasion in HBMEC expressing dominant-negative FAK and PI3K and in HBMEC treated with pharmacologic inhibitors of FAK and PI3K, but FAK is upstream of PI3K in E. coli invasion of HBMEC. This is shown by the demonstration that PI3K activation was abolished in HBMEC expressing dominant-negative FAK (86). Similarly, both STAT3 and Rac1 are involved in meningitis-causing E. coli invasion of HBMEC, but STAT3 is upstream of Rac1, as shown by blockade of Rac1 activation in HBMEC expressing dominant-negative STAT3 (88). Also, cPLA2α and PKCα are involved in meningitis-causing E. coli invasion of HBMEC, but cPLA2α is upstream of PKCα, as shown by the demonstration that inhibition of cPLA2α prevents PKCα activation in response to meningitis-causing E. coli in HBMEC (40).
As indicated before, despite the comprehensive information on host cell signaling molecules contributing to E. coli invasion of HBMECs, it remains incompletely understood why and how several microbial factors are involved in HBMEC binding and invasion. It also remains to be determined whether complete abolition of HBMEC binding and invasion requires deletion of all the non-redundant bacterial factors contributing to HBMEC binding and invasion.
THE PATHOGENESIS OF E. COLI MENINGITIS: FUNCTIONAL GENOMIC APPROACHES
Genome sequencing information of meningitis-causing microbes is likely to provide a new tool for elucidating the pathogenesis of meningitis, but its utilization so far has been limited to meningitis-causing E. coli. Comparative genome analysis of the prototypic meningitis-causing E. coli strain RS218 (O18:K1) versus laboratory E. coli strain MG1655 identified 22 RS218-derived islands that are larger than 10 kb and are absent in strain MG1655 (51). These RS218-derived islands are termed RDIs. The total length of these RDIs is approximately 793 kb, which replaced approximately 80 kb of MG1655-specific sequences. The actual chromosomal size difference between RS218 and MG1655 was approximately 450 kb, which is slightly smaller than the previously estimated genome size difference between RS218 and MG1655 (91). Previous studies using comparative macrorestriction mapping and subtractive hybridization of the chromosomes of meningitis-causing E. coli (e.g., O18:K1 strains RS218 and C5) compared with nonpathogenic E. coli have identified 500 kb spread over at least 12 chromosome loci specific to meningitis-causing E. coli (92, 93). Mapping studies reveal that those E. coli loci are located at different regions of E. coli chromosome. Twenty-two RDIs have been shown to be located at different regions of E. coli RS218 chromosome (51).
By use of RDI deletion mutants, eight RDIs have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis (i.e., induction of a high degree of bacteremia and HBMEC binding/invasion) (51). The size and characteristics of these eight RDIs are summarized in Table 3. Two RDIs include a P4-family integrase and are directly adjacent to tRNAs (RDI 4-serX and RDI 21-leuX), and four RDIs (RDI 7, RDI 16, RDI 21, and RDI 22) have markedly lower GC percentages compared with the whole RS218 genome, suggesting that those RDIs are likely to be acquired through horizontal gene transfer. Further identification and characterization of microbial determinants from those RDIs that are involved in the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis should help in elucidating the microbial-host interactions that are involved in meningitis.
Table 3.
RDI | Size (kb) | Anchor tRNA | %GCa | Defects in bacteremiab | Defects in HBMEC binding/invasionb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 28.7 | aspV | 51.52 | - | + |
4 | 61.7 | serX | 48.07 | + | + |
7 | 14.9 | 41.91 | + | + | |
13 | 12.1 | 50.49 | - | + | |
16 | 27.7 | pheW | 45.68 | + | - |
20 | 10.9 | 48.86 | - | + | |
21 | 116.5 | leuX | 46.22 | + | - |
22 | 20.3 | 46.11 | - | + |
The average %GC in the E. coli strain RS218 genome is 50.63.
+ indicates RDI deletion mutants exhibiting defects in inducing a high-degree of bacteremia and/or HBMEC binding/invasion.
Data from (51)
At present, a few virulence factors identified from prototypic meningitis-causing O18:K1 E. coli strains (e.g., strains RS218 and C5) have been used to understand the pathogenesis of meningitis (21-24, 51, 94-97), but it is unclear whether the information derived from these E. coli K1 strains is comprehensive and relevant to other E. coli meningitis isolates. For example, some of the identified E. coli factors are shown to be uncommon in CSF isolates (e.g., CNF1) (98).
A comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) with an E. coli DNA microarray was carried out to examine the basis of meningitis caused by representative E. coli strains isolated from blood and CSF (97). These strains include RS218 (O18:K1), C5 (18:K1), IHE3034 (O18:K1), EC10 (O7:K1), A90 (O1:K1), RS168 (O1:K1), RS167 (O16:K1), E253 (O12:K1), E334 (O12:K1), S88 (O45:K1), and S95 (O45:K1). A hierarchical clustering revealed that these strains can be categorized into two groups. Group 1 includes strains RS218, C5, IHE3034, A90, RS167, E334, S88, and S95, while strains EC10, RS168, and E334 belong to group 2. All group 1 strains belong to the phylogenetic group B2, which is predominant in meningitis isolates, and group 2 strains belong to less common phylogenetic groups A and D (97). All group 2 strains have been shown to harbor some genes from E. coli type III secretion system 2 (ETT2), but none of group 1 strains harbor ETT2 (97). The existence of a degenerate ETT2 gene cluster has been shown in septicemic E. coli O78 strains (99). Sequence analysis of the ETT2 genes showed premature stop codons in eprI and eprJ encoding the needle structure and deletion of the invG gene, which encodes a conserved component of the outer membrane ring. This ETT2 lacks the gene (eivC) for the cytoplasmic ATPase that energizes secretion and some other conserved components of type III secretion system (e.g., epaS). However, a deletion mutant of genes coding for the putative inner membrane ring of the secretion complex showed significantly reduced virulence in a 1-day-old chick model, even though the mutation does not seem to affect the secreted proteome (99 ). Meningitis-causing E. coli strain EC10 from group 2 was found to harbor all the genes needed to encode type III secretion apparatus proteins compared with the aforementioned septicemic E. coli O78 strain 789 (97, 100). The type III secretion system has been shown to be involved in EC10's invasion and intracellular survival in HBMECs (101), and additional studies are needed to elucidate the role of type III secretion system in the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis.
The CGH was also utilized to examine the distribution of the eight RDIs that are relevant to the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis among representative meningitis-causing E. coli isolates (67). RDI 16 harbors the K1 capsule biosynthesis gene cluster and, as expected, is present in all of the meningitis isolates. The other pathogenic RDIs are found to exist in strains belonging to the above-mentioned group1 and phylogenetic group B2. For example, RDI 1, 7, 13, 20, and 22 are widely distributed among this group of E. coli strains. Previous studies using PCR, dot blot, and Southern blot suggest that PAI III536-like, PAI IIJ96-like, and GimA-like ectochromosomal DNA domains (ECDNAs) are prevalent among O18:K1 strains, the most common serogroup in meningitis-causing E. coli (94). Based on their virulence signatures, those ECDNAs correspond to RDI 4, 21, and 22, respectively. The distribution of these three RDIs among O18:K1 strains based on CGH is consistent with previous findings (51, 94). The CGH analysis also revealed that type VI secretion system (T6SS)-like gene clusters, including the icmF-like component, clpV, dotU, and hcp2, are present in the RDI 1 (51, 102 ). Of interest, the T6SS clusters have two hcp-like genes located next to each other in the chromosome of strain RS218, and the two Hcp family proteins have been shown to exhibit different roles in meningitis-causing E. coli infection and coordinately contribute to the pathogenesis of E. coli interaction with HBMEC, e. g., E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC as well as release of IL-6 from HBMEC (102).
In addition, microbial DNA microarrays offer new opportunities for exploring microbial gene expression profiles during microbe-host interactions. For example, using E. coli DNA microarray analysis with microarray-grade bacterial RNA isolated from E. coli interacting with HBMECs, the expression of the type 1 fimbria genes is shown to be significantly higher for E. coli associated with HBMEC than for E. coli not associated with HBMECs (59). Subsequently, type 1 fimbriae are shown to play an important role in E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMECs (59), indicating that microbial DNA microarray analysis has a potential for elucidating microbial-host interactions that are relevant to the pathogenesis of meningitis.
Some meningitis-causing E. coli strains (e. g., strains S88 and RS218) harbor large plasmids (103, 104). The plasmids from strains S88 (045:K1) and RS218 (018:K1) have been shown to contribute to a high-degree of bacteremia, suggesting that they are involved in the development of E. coli meningitis, but the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood.
PREVENTION OF BACTERIAL PENETRATION INTO THE BRAIN BY TARGETING THE MICROBIAL-HOST FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO E. COLI INVASION OF THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER
Meningitis-causing E. coli penetration into the brain requires E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMEC, involving specific microbial and host factors, and host cell signaling molecules (7, 21-25, 28). The information on host cell receptors and host cell signal transduction pathways in the microbial invasion of the blood–brain barrier is likely to provide a new paradigm for prevention and therapy of meningitis by targeting such host cell receptors or signaling molecules (7, 21-25, 28, 40, 41, 68, 79, 88, 105). A proof-of-concept study has shown that down-modulation of the HBMEC receptor for CNF1 (37LRP) and blockade or inhibition of host cell signaling molecules involved in E coli invasion of HBMECs (e.g., cPLA2α) were efficient in preventing E coli penetration into the brain (7, 21, 25, 28, 41, 41, 79). In addition, pharmacological inhibition and gene deletion of host cell signaling molecules (e. g., cPLA2α) involved in E. coli invasion of HBMECs was efficient in preventing E. coli penetration into the brain (40, 41).
Determination of the host cell receptors that interact with E. coli factors and host cell signaling molecules contributing to E. coli invasion of HBMEC also provides a novel strategy for elucidating the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis. The feasibility of this novel strategy was shown by the demonstration that pharmacological inhibition of the host cell signaling molecules involved in E. coli invasion of HBMEC (e. g., cPLA2α) was beneficial in elucidating the novel mechanisms involved in E. coli penetration into the brain (e.g., cPLA2α-cysteinyl leukotrienes) (7, 21-25, 28, 40, 41). Additional studies are needed to elucidate the microbial–host factors that contribute to E. coli invasion of HBMEC and also can serve as a novel target for prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis.
An additional novel strategy for prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis is to modulate the expression and/or secretion of the microbial factors contributing to HBMEC binding and invasion. For example, CNF1 is a key factor contributing to E. coli invasion of HBMEC and penetration into the brain via the interaction with its receptor (37LRP) on HBMEC (55, 79). CNF1, however, is a cytoplasmic protein and execution of its contribution to E. coli invasion of the blood–brain barrier requires its secretion from the bacterial cytoplasm. No signal peptide is found in the CNF1 sequence. CNF1 secretion is, therefore, a strategy utilized by meningitis-causing E. coli to invade the blood–brain barrier. It, however, remains unclear how CNF1 secretion occurs across the bacterial inner membrane and outer membranes. Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in CNF1 secretion is, therefore, likely to enhance our knowledge on the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis and also help in developing a novel strategy targeting CNF1 secretion in prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis (83, 84). Taken together, these findings suggest that modulation of bacterial secretion systems (CNF1 secretion, type II secretion, type III secretion, type VI secretion) represents a novel target for prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis.
THE MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN CNS INFLAMMATION FOLLOWING E. COLI PENETRATION INTO THE BRAIN
Bacterial meningitis is characterized by inflammation of the meninges that occurs in response to bacteria and bacterial products, resulting in release of cytokines and chemokines as well as pathophysiological alterations such as infiltration of leukocytes and blood–brain barrier dysfunction (7, 21, 24, 25, 28). Several studies have shown that the mechanisms involved in microbial invasion of the blood–brain barrier differ from those involved in the release of cytokines and chemokines in response to meningitis-causing pathogens (7, 21, 24, 25, 28). For example, interleukin-8 (IL-8) secretion in response to E coli strain happens in HBMEC, but not in non-brain endothelial cells (e.g., human umbilical vein endothelial cells). However, E coli factors involved in HBMEC binding and invasion did not affect the release of IL-8 from HBMEC (106). Similar findings were demonstrated for N. meningitidis (107). These findings suggest that targets for prevention of bacterial penetration across the blood-brain barrier are likely to differ from those involved in CNS inflammation associated with bacterial meningitis.
CONCLUSION
A major limitation to advances in prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis is our incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease. Successful E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier requires a high-degree of bacteremia as well as E. coli binding to and invasion of HBMECs, but the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Studies with the in vitro and in vivo blood-brain barrier models have shed light on the mechanisms of microbial translocation of the blood-brain barrier, a key step for the development of meningitis. At present, the basis for requiring a high-degree of bacteremia for E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier, however, remains unknown. Meningitis-causing E. coli penetrates the blood-brain barrier transcellularly without altering the integrity of the HBMEC monolayer and without affecting blood-brain barrier permeability. Meningitis-causing E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier exploits specific microbial and host factors as well as specific host cell signal transduction pathways. Complete understanding of the microbial-host interactions that are involved in E. coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier as well as blood-brain barrier penetration-induced intracranial inflammation should help in developing a new strategy for prevention and therapy of E. coli meningitis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS26310, NS91102, NS94012, AI84984, AI113273 and AI114925.
References
- 1.Chang CJ, Chang WN, Huang LT, Huang SC, Chang YC, Hung PL, Lu CH, Chang CS, Cheng BC, Lee PY, Wang KW, Chang HW. Bacterial meningitis in infants: the epidemiology, clinical features, and prognostic factors. Brain Dev. 2004;26:168–175. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(03)00122-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dawson KG, Emerson JC, Burns JL. Fifteen years of experience with bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:816–822. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199909000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.de Louvois J, Halket S, Harvey D. Neontal meningitis in England and Wales: sequelae at 5 years of age. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;7:730–734. doi: 10.1007/s00431-005-1747-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doctor BA, Newman N, Minich NM, Taylor HG, Fanaroff AA, Hack M. Clinical outcomes of neonatal meningitis in very-low birth-weight infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2001;40:473–480. doi: 10.1177/000992280104000901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gladstone IM, Ehrenkranz RA, Edberg SC, Baltimore RS. A ten-year review of neonatal sepsis and comparison with the previous fifty-year experience. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:819–825. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199011000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holt DE, Halket S, de Louvois J, Harvey D. Neonatal meningitis in England and Wales: 10 years on. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;84:F85–F89. doi: 10.1136/fn.84.2.F85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim KS. Acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:32–42. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70306-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Klinger G, Chin C-N, Beyene J, Perlman M. Predicting the outcome of neonatal bacterial meningitis. Pediatrics. 2000;106:477–482. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.3.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stevens JP, Eames M, Kent A, Halket S, Holt D, Harvey D. Long term outcome of neonatal meningitis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88:F179–F184. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.3.F179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Unhanand M, Mustafa MM, McCracken GH, Jr, Nelson JD. Gram-negative enteric bacillary meningitis: a twenty-one-year experience. J Pediatr. 1993;122:15–21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83480-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim KS. Comparison of cefotaxime, imipenem-cilastatin, ampicillin-gentamicin, and ampicillin chloramphenicol in the treatment of experimental Escherichia coli bacteremia and meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;28:433–436. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.3.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McCracken GH, Jr, Threlkeld N, Mize S, Baker CJ, Kapal SL, Fraingezicht I, Feldman WF, Schad U, Neonatal Meningitis Cooperative Study Group Moxalactam therapy for neonatal meningitis due to gram-negative sepsis enteric bacilli. JAMA. 1984;252:1427–1432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dietzman DE, Fischer GW, Schoenknecht FD. Neonatal Escherichia coli septicemia--bacterial counts in blood. J Pediatr. 1974;85:128–130. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(74)80308-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim KS, Itabashi H, Gemski P, Sadoff J, Warren RL, Cross AS. The K1 capsule is the critical determinant in the development of Escherichia coli meningitis in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:897–905. doi: 10.1172/JCI115965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gross RJ, Ward LR, Threlfall EJ, Cheasty T, Rowe B. Drug resistance among Escherichia coli strains isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. J Hyg (Lond) 1983;90:195–198. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400028850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Korhonen TK, Valtonen MV, Parkkinen J, Väisänen-Rhen V, Finne J, Orskov F, Orskov I, Svenson SB, Mäkelä PH. Serotypes, hemolysin production, and receptor recognition of Escherichia coli strains associated with neonatal sepsis and meningitis. Infect Immun. 1985;48:486–491. doi: 10.1128/iai.48.2.486-491.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Robbins JB, McCracken GH, Jr, Gotschlich EC, Orskov F, Orskov I, Hanson LA. Escherichia coli K1 capsular polysaccharide associated with neonatal meningitis. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:1216–1220. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197405302902202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bonacorsi S, Clermont O, Houdouin V, Cordevant C, Brahimi N, Marecat A, Tinsley C, Nassif X, Lange M, Bingen E. Molecular analysis and experimental virulence of French and North American Escherichia coli neonatal meningitis isolates: identification of a new virulent clone. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1895–1906. doi: 10.1086/375347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim KS, Kang JH, Cross AS, Kaufman B, Zollinger W, Sadoff J. Functional activities of monoclonal antibodies to the O side chain of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharides in vitro and in vivo. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:47–53. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sarff LD, McCracken GH, Jr, Schiffer MS, Glode MP, Robbins JB, Orskov I, Orskov F. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli K1 in healthy and diseased newborns. Lancet. 1975;1:1099–1104. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92496-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim KS. Mechanisms of microbial traversal of the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:625–634. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim KS. Escherichia coli translocation at the blood-brain barrier. Infect Immun. 2001;69:5217–5222. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5217-5222.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim KS. Strategy of Escherichia coli for crossing the blood-brain barrier. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(Suppl 2):S220–S224. doi: 10.1086/344284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim KS. Neurological diseases: pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis: from bacteremia to neuronal injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:376–385. doi: 10.1038/nrn1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim KS. How pathogens penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Microbe. 2014;9:487–492. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rubin LL, Staddon JM. The cell biology of the blood-brain barrier. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:11–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim BY, Kang J, Kim KS. Invasion processes of pathogenic Escherichia coli. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:463–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim KS. Current concepts on the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis; implications for prevention and therapy. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:273–278. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283521eb0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim YV, DiCello F, Hillaire CS, Kim KS. Protease-activated receptors of human brain microvascular endothelial cells: expression and differential Ca2+ signaling induced by thrombin and protease-activated receptor-1 activating peptide. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;286:C31–C42. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00157.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stins MF, Badger J, Sik Kim K. Bacterial invasion and transcytosis in transfected human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Microb Pathog. 2001;30:19–28. doi: 10.1006/mpat.2000.0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stins MF, Gilles F, Kim KS. Selective expression of adhesion molecules on human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;76:81–90. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(97)00036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rüffer C, Strey A, Janning A, Kim KS, Gerke V. Cell-cell junctions of dermal microvascular endothelial cells contain tight and adherens junction proteins in spatial proximity. Biochemistry. 2004;43:5360–5369. doi: 10.1021/bi035517c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nemani PV, Stins M, Wass CA, Shimada H, Kim KS. Outer membrane A promoted cytoskeletal rearrangement of brain microvascular endothelial cells is required for E. coli invasion. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5775–5783. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.11.5775-5783.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang SH, Wass C, Fu Q, Prasadarao NV, Stins M, Kim KS. Escherichia coli invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo: molecular cloning and characterization of invasion gene ibe10. Infect Immun. 1995;63:4470–4475. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.11.4470-4475.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huang SH, Chen YH, Fu Q, Stins M, Wang Y, Wass C, Kim KS. Identification and characterization of an Escherichia coli invasion gene locus, ibeB, required for penetration of brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999;67:2103–2109. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.5.2103-2109.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoffman JA, Badger JL, Zhang Y, Huang SH, Kim KS. Escherichia coli K1 aslA contributes to invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Infect Immun. 2000;68:5062–5067. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.9.5062-5067.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang Y, Huang SH, Wass CA, Stins MF, Kim KS. The gene locus yijP contributes to Escherichia coli K1 invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999;67:4751–4756. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.9.4751-4756.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang Y, Kim KS. Role of OmpA and IbeB in Escherichia coli K1 invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Pediatr Res. 2002;51:559–563. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200205000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Y, Wen ZG, Kim KS. Role of S fimbriae in Escherichia coli K1 binding to brain microvascular endothelial cells in vitro and penetration into the central nervous system in vivo. Microb Pathog. 2004;37:287–293. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2004.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhu L, Maruvada R, Sapirstein A, Malik KU, Peters-Golden M, Kim KS. Arachidonic acid metabolism regulates Escherichia coli penetration of the blood-brain barrier. Infect Immun. 2010a;78:4302–4310. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00624-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhu L, Pearce D, Kim KS. Prevention of Escherichia coli K1 penetration of the blood-brain barrier by counteracting the host cell receptor and signaling molecule involved in E. coli invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2010b;78:3554–3559. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00336-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim KS, Wass CA, Cross AS. Blood-brain barrier permeability during the development of experimental bacterial meningitis in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1997;145:253–257. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xie Y, Kim KJ, Kim KS. Current concepts on Escherichia coli K1 translocation of the blood-brain barrier. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004;42:271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stins MF, Nemani PV, Wass C, Kim KS. Escherichia coli binding to and invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells derived from humans and rats of different ages. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5522–5525. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.10.5522-5525.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cross AS, Kim KS, Wright DC, Sadoff JC, Gemski P. Role of lipopolysaccharide and capsule in the serum resistance of bacteremic strains of Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:497–503. doi: 10.1093/infdis/154.3.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kim KS, Kang JH, Cross AS. The role of capsular antigens in serum resistance and in vivo virulence of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;35:275–278. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cross A, Artenstein A, Que J, Fredeking T, Furer E, Sadoff JC, Cryz SJ., Jr Safety and immunogenicity of a polyvalent Escherichia coli vaccine in human volunteers. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:834–840. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.4.834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Finne J, Bitter-Suermann D, Goridis C, Finne U. An IgG monoclonal antibody to group B meningococci cross-reacts with developmentally regulated polysialic acid units of glycoproteins in neural and extraneural tissues. J Immunol. 1987;138:4402–4407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Söderström T, Hansson G, Larson G. The Escherichia coli K1 capsule shares antigenic determinants with the human gangliosides GM3 and GD3. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:726–727. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198403153101121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Moriel DG, Bertoldi I, Spagnuolo A, Marchi S, Rosini R, Nesta B, Pastorello I, Corea VA, Torricelli G, Cartocci E, Savino S, Scarselli M, Dobrindt U, Hacker J, Tettelin H, Tallon LJ, Sullivan S, Wieler LH, Ewers C, Pickard D, Dougan G, Fontana MR, Rappuoli R, Pizza M, Serino L. Identification of protective and broadly conserved vaccine antigens from the genome of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. PNAS. 2010;107:9072–9077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915077107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xie Y, Kolisnychenko V, Paul-Satyaseela M, Elliott S, Parthasarathy G, Yao Y, Plunkett G, III, Blattner FR, Kim KS. Identification and characterization of Escherichia coli RS218-derived islands in the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:358–364. doi: 10.1086/505429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Teng CH, Tseng YT, Maruvada R, Pearce D, Xie Y, Paul-Satyaseela M, Kim KS. NlpI contributes to Escherichia coli K1 strain RS218 interaction with human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2010;78:3090–3096. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00034-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tseng YT, Wang SW, Kim KS, Wang YH, Yao Y, Chen CC, Chiang CW, Hsieh PC, Teng CH. NlpI facilitates deposition of C4bp on Escherichia coli by blocking classical complement-mediated killing, which results in high-level bacteremia. Infect Immun. 2012;80:3669–3678. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00320-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wieser A, Magistro G, Nörenberg D, Hoffmann C, Schubert S. First multi-epitope subunit vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli delivered by a bacterial type-3 secretion system (T3SS). Int J Med Microbiol. 2012;302:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Khan NA, Wang Y, Kim KJ, Chung JW, Wass CA, Kim KS. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1 contributes to Escherichia coli K1 invasion of the central nervous system. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:15607–15612. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112224200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Khan NA, Kim Y, Shin S, Kim KS. FimH-mediated Escherichia coli K1 invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:169–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Prasadarao NV, Wass CA, Weiser JN, Stins MF, Huang SH, Kim KS. Outer membrane protein A of Escherichia coli contributes to invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 1996b;64:146–153. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.1.146-153.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shin S, Lu G, Cai M, Kim KS. Escherichia coli outer membrane protein A adheres to human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;330:1199–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Teng CH, Cai M, Shin S, Xie Y, Kim KJ, Khan NA, Di Cello F, Kim KS. Escherichia coli K1 RS218 interacts with human brain microvascular endothelial cells via type 1 fimbria phase-on bacteria. Infect Immun. 2005;73:2923–2931. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2923-2931.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Orskov I, Orskov F. Serology of Escherichia coli fimbriae. Prog Allergy. 1983;33:80–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xie Y, Yao Y, Kolisnychenko V, Teng CH, Kim KS. HbiF regulates type 1 fimbriation independently of FimB and FimE. Infect Immun. 2006;74:4039–4047. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02058-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim Y, Pearce D, Kim KS. Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent invasion of the human brain microvascular endothelial cells by Escherichia coli K1. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;332:427–433. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0598-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Parkkinen J, Korhonen TK, Pere A, Hacker J, Soinila S. Binding sites in the rat brain for Escherichia coli S fimbriae associated with neonatal meningitis. J Clin Invest. 1988;81:860–865. doi: 10.1172/JCI113395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Prasadarao NV, Wass CA, Hacker J, Jann K, Kim KS. Adhesion of S-fimbriated Escherichia coli to brain glycolipids mediated by sfaA gene-encoded protein of S-fimbriae. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:10356–10363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stins MF, Prasadarao NV, Ibric L, Wass CA, Luckett P, Kim KS. Binding characteristics of S fimbriated Escherichia coli to isolated brain microvascular endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 1994;145:1228–1236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Parthasarathy G, Yao Y, Kim KS. Flagella promote Escherichia coli K1 association with and invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2937–2945. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01543-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Xie Y, Parthasarathy G, Di Cello F, Teng CH, Paul-Satyaseela M, Kim KS. Transcriptome of Escherichia coli K1 bound to human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;365:201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Maruvada R, Kim KS. Extracellular loops of the Eschericia coli outer membrane protein A contribute to the pathogenesis of meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:131–140. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Khan NA, Shin S, Chung JW, Kim KJ, Elliott S, Wang Y, Kim KS. Outer membrane protein A and cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1 use diverse signaling mechanisms for Escherichia coli K1 invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Microb Pathog. 2003;35:35–42. doi: 10.1016/s0882-4010(03)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Nemani PV, Wass CA, Kim KS. Endothelial cell GlcNAcB1-4 GlcNAc epitopes for outer membrane protein A traversal of E. coli across the blood-brain barrier. Infect Immun. 1996a;64:154–160. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.1.154-160.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Teng C-H, Xie Y, Shin S, Di Cello F, Paul-Satyaseela M, Cai M, Kim KS. Effects of ompA deletion on expression of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli K1 strain RS218 and on the association of E. coli with human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5609–5616. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00321-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Barnich N, Bringer MA, Claret L, Darfeuille-Michaud A. Involvement of lipoprotein NlpI in the virulence of adherent invasive Escherichia coli strain LF82 isolated from a patient with Crohn's disease. Infect Immun. 2004;72:2484–2493. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.5.2484-2493.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Badger JL, Wass CA, Kim KS. Identification of Escherichia coli K1 genes contributing to human brain microvascular endothelial cell invasion by differential fluorescence induction. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36:174–182. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Badger J, Wass C, Weissman S, Kim KS. Application of signature-tagged mutagenesis for the identification of E coli K1 genes that contribute to invasion of the blood-brain barrier. Infect Immun. 2000;68:5056–5061. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.9.5056-5061.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Boquet P. The cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1) from Escherichia coli. Toxicon. 2001;39:1673–1680. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(01)00154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Flatau G, Lemichez E, Gauthier M, Chardin P, Paris S, Fiorentini C, Boquet P. Toxin-induced activation of the G protein p21 Rho by deamidation of glutamine. Nature. 1997;387:729–733. doi: 10.1038/42743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Schmidt G, Sehr P, Wilm M, Selzer J, Mann M, Aktories K. Gln 63 of Rho is deamidated by Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1. Nature. 1997;387:725–729. doi: 10.1038/42735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fabbri A, Falzano L, Travaglione S, Stringaro A, Malorni W, Fais S, Fiorentini C. Rho-activating Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1: macropinocytosis of apoptotic bodies in human epithelial cells. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002;291:551–554. doi: 10.1078/1438-4221-00166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chung JW, Hong SJ, Kim KJ, Goti D, Stins MF, Shin S, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Kim KS. 37-kDa laminin receptor precursor modulates cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1-mediated RhoA activation and bacterial uptake. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:16857–16862. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301028200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Massia SP, Rao SS, Hubbell JA. Covalently immobilized laminin peptide Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-Arg (YIGSR) supports cell spreading and co-localization of the 67-kilodalton laminin receptor with alpha-actinin and vinculin. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:8053–8059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kim KJ, Chung JW, Kim KS. 67-kDa laminin receptor promotes internalization of cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1-expressing Escherichia coli K1 into human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1360–1368. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410176200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ménard S, Tagliabue E, Colnaghi MI. The 67 kDa laminin receptor as a prognostic factor in human cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;52:137–145. doi: 10.1023/a:1006171403765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Yu H, Kim KS. Ferredoxin is involved in secretion of cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 across the cytoplasmic membrane in Escherichia coli K1. Infect Immun. 2010;78:838–844. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00674-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yu H, Kim KS. YgfZ contributes to secretion of cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 into outer-membrane vesicles in Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 2012;158:612–621. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.054122-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kim KJ, Elliott SJ, Di Cello F, Stins MF, Kim KS. The K1 capsule modulates trafficking of E. coli- containing vacuoles and enhances intracellular bacterial survival in human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5:245–252. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.t01-1-00271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Reddy MA, Prasadarao NV, Wass CA, Kim KS. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation and interaction with focal adhesion kinase in Escherichia coli K1 invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36769–36774. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007382200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Reddy MA, Wass CA, Kim KS, Schlaepfer DD, Prasadarao NV. Involvement of focal adhesion kinase in Escherichia coli invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2000;68:6423–6430. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.11.6423-6430.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Maruvada R, Kim KS. IbeA and OmpA of Escherichia coli K1 exploit Rac1 activation for invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2012;80:2035–2041. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06320-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhao WD, Liu W, Fang WG, Kim KS, Chen YH. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 contributes to Escherichia coli K1 invasion ofhuman brain microvascular endothelial cells through PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Infect Immun. 2010;78:4809–4816. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00377-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Martinez JJ, Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ. Type 1 pilus-mediated bacterial invasion of bladder epithelial cells. EMBO J. 2000;19:2803–2812. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.12.2803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rode CK, Melkerson-Watson LJ, Johnson AT, Bloch CA. Type-specific contributions to chromosome size differences in Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1999;67:230–236. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.1.230-236.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bloch CA, Huang SH, Rode CK, Kim KS. Mapping of noninvasion TnphoA mutations on the Escherichia coli O18:K1:H7 chromosome. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;144:171–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Bonacorsi SP, Clermont O, Tinsley C, Le Gall I, Beaudoin JC, Elion J, Nassif X, Bingen E. Identification of regions of the Escherichia coli chromosome specific for neonatal meningitis-associated strains. Infect Immun. 2000;68:2096–2101. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.4.2096-2101.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bingen E, Picard B, Brahimi N, Mathy S, Desjardins P, Elion J, Denamur E. Phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli strains causing neonatal meningitis suggests horizontal gene transfer from a predominant pool of highly virulent B2 group strains. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:642–650. doi: 10.1086/514217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Johnson JR, Delavari P, O’Bryan TT. Escherichia coli O18:K1:H7 isolates from patients with acute cystitis and neonatal meningitis exhibit common phylogenetic origins and virulence factor profiles. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:425–434. doi: 10.1086/318086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Johnson JR, Oswald E, O'Bryan TT, Kuskowski MA, Spanjaard L. Phylogenetic distribution of virulence-associated genes among Escherichia coli isolates associated with neonatal bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:774–784. doi: 10.1086/339343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yao Y, Xie Y, Kim KS. Genomic comparison of Escherichia coli K1 strains isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis. Infect Immun. 2006;74:2196–2206. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2196-2206.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Houdouin V, Bonacorsi S, Bidet P, Blanco J, De La Rocque F, Cohen R, Aujard Y, Bingen E. Association between mortality of Escherichia coli meningitis in young infants and non-virulent clonal groups of strains. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:685–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ideses D, Gophna U, Paitan Y, Chaudhuri RR, Pallen MJ, Ron EZ. A degenerate type III secretion system from septicemic Escherichia coli contributes to pathogenesis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:8164–8171. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.23.8164-8171.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lu S, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Kim KS, Yang J, Jin Q. Complete genome sequence of the neonatal- meningitis-associated Escherichia coli strain CE10. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:7005. doi: 10.1128/JB.06284-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Yao Y, Xie Y, Perace D, Zhong Y, Lu J, Tao J, Guo X, Kim KS. The type III secretion system is involved in the invasion and intracellular survival of Escherichia coli K1 in human brain microvascular endothelial cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;300:18–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01763.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhou Y, Tao J, Yu H, Ni J, Zeng L, Teng Q, Kim KS, Zhao GP, Guo X, Yao Y. Hcp family proteins secreted via the type VI secretion system coordinately regulate Escherichia coli K1 interaction with human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2012;80:1243–1251. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05994-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Peigne C, Bidet P, Mahjoub-Messai F, Plainvert C, Barbe V, Médigue C, Frapy E, Nassif X, Denamur E, Bingen E, Bonacorsi S. The plasmid of Escherichia coli strain S88 (O45:K1:H7) that causes neonatal meningitis is closely related to avian pathogenic E. coli plasmids and is associated with high-level bacteremia in a neonatal rat meningitis model. Infect Immun. 2009;77:2272–84. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01333-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wijetunge DS, Karunathilake KH, Chaudhari A, Katani R, Dudley EG, Kapur V, DebRoy C, Kariyawasam S. Complete nucleotide sequence of pRS218, a large virulence plasmid that augments pathogenic potential of meningitis-associated Escherichia coli strain RS218. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:203. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0203-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Das A, Asatryan L, Reddy MA, Wass CA, Stins MF, Joshi S, Bonventre JV, Kim KS. Differential role of cytosolic phospholipase A2 in the invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells by Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:732–737. doi: 10.1086/322986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Galanakis E, Di Cello F, Paul-Satyaseela M, Kim KS. Escherichia coli K1 induces IL-8 expression in human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2006;17:260–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Sokolova O, Heppel N, Jägerhuber R, Kim KS, Frosch M, Eigenthaler M, Schubert-Unkmeir A. Interaction of Neisseria meningitidis with human brain microvascular endothelial cells: role of MAP- and tyrosine kinases in invasion and inflammatory cytokine release. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6:1153–1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]