Abstract
An NADP-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from Clostridium acetobutylicum (CaADH) has been expressed and characterized. CaADH enantioselectively reduces aromatic α-, β- and γ-keto esters to the corresponding D-hydroxy esters and provides a building block for the Taxotère side chain (95% yield, 95% de, 99% ee) by dynamic reductive kinetic resolution (DYRKR).
Biocatalytic synthesis with purified enzymes, including aldolases,1 epoxide hydrolases,2 Baeyer-Villigerases,3 amine oxidases,4 lipases,5 and alcohol dehydrogenases,6 is emerging as a viable alternative to traditional asymmetric synthesis. The recent transaminase-based asymmetric synthesis of the Januvia™ core by the Merck-Codexis team highlights the viability of such approaches, and was recognized with the 2010 Presidential Green Challenge Award.7
This strategem tracks with a long-standing interest in our group in using enzymes in asymmetric synthesis.8,9 Of late, that focus has been especially on alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs), both for asymmetric carbonyl reduction10 and for installation of a center alpha- to a carbonyl, via dynamic reductive kinetic resolution (DYRKR), using a hyperthermophilic archael dehydrogenase.11
In seeking other sources of synthetically useful DH’s, we were struck by properties of the microorganism, Clostridium acetobutylicum. The organism has both acidogenic and solventogentic growth phases,12 and is known to produce high titres of organic solvent in the latter. Indeed, n-butanol is one of the most abundant solvents produced, leading to great interest in Clostridial strain fermentation,13 and importation of Clostridial genes into other hosts toward bio-butanol production.14 Particularly notable in this latter endeavor (yeast host) are the efforts of Keasling and his team at DOE’s Joint BioEnergy Institute.15 This suggested to us that Clostridia likely both possess enzymes capable of reducing organic carbonyl functionalities, and of operating in a mixed aqueous, alcoholic solvent milieu.
Indeed, early studies at UMIST revealed the presence of such alicyclic/aromatic carbonyl reduction activity in C. acetobutylicum.16 Now the entire C. acetobutylicum genome has been sequenced,17 and consists of a 3.94 MB chromosome and a 192 KB megaplasmid that encodes six different genes annotated as DHs, one of which (GI: 15004706) has 40% homology to a β-ketoacyl reductase from Ralstonia eutropha, an enzyme capable of enantioselective carbonyl reduction.18 Henceforth, this enzyme will be labeled simply Clostridium acetobutylicum ADH (CaADH - 251 AAs, 28.5 KD – calcd MW and 9.5 – calcd pI). This short chain NADPH-dependent DH is clearly distinct from the established NADH-dependent butanol DH that has been well characterized for some time.19 CaADH was expressed in recombinant form in E. coli and purified via a hexahistidine-tag.
As can be seen in the SDS-PAGE overview (Figure 2), abundant expression of the target protein was seen in the E. coli host, and the (his)6-tag, provided a useful handle for purification via Co2+-NTA agarose affinity chromatography. Even though the growth temperature was reduced to 25°C, after induction with IPTG, and held there for 16 h, considerable protein (likely aggregated CaADH) was seen in the pellet. That said, we were delighted to obtain over 5 mg of soluble, homogeneous protein, of high specific activity (58 U/mg-benzaldhyde reduction) per liter of culture.
Figure 2.
SDS-PAGE gel illustrating the purification of CaADH: Outside lanes = molecular markers (MM); then l to r: (i) crude supernatant; (ii) crude pellet; (iii) eluent from Co2+-column; (iv) 6 x loading of (iii)
Next, substrate specificity was evaluated, by sequential screening against batteries of aldehyde (Figure 3) and ketone (Figure 4) substrate candidates. Several clear trends emerged. On the one hand, aromatic aldehydes and ketones possessing a carbonyl group directly conjugated with a benzenoid ring are, in general, quite good substrates. Simple aliphatic aldehydes are much poorer substrates. Insertion of one or two methylene units between the aromatic ring and the aldehyde carbonyl group, i.e. as in phenylacetaldehyde and hydrocinnamaldehye, respectively, greatly depletes substrate activity.
Figure 3.
SAR survey of aldehyde substrates for CaADH (all at 10 mM in 100 mM K2PO4,/KH2PO4 pH 7). Rates are normalized to that for benzaldehyde (100%). Note that the rate for 4-pyridine carboxaldehyde is off scale.
Figure 4.
SAR survey of ketone substrates for CaADH, revealing a predilection for reducing w-keto ester substrates
Within the apparently preferred Ar-C=O substructure, there appears to be great sensitivity to aryl ring electronics. At the extremes, the electronic rich aromatic aldehyde, furfural, shows a full order of magnitude slower reduction than benzaldehye, whereas 4-pyridine carboxaldhyde is that fastest substrate yet identified for this ADH. Interestingly, however, movement of the ring nitrogen to the 3-position leads to a better substrate, than its placement at the 2-position, clearly indicating that the inherent electronics of the substrate can be overridden in the active site. One possible explanation that an active site general acid is present capable of protonating a ring N when it is presented at the 3- or 4-position, relative to the carbonyl, but incapable of doing so at the 2-position.
Retaining the well-tolerated aroyl group, we next appended a (CH2)nCO2R moiety, to scan for the ability of this CaADH to handle ω-keto esters (Figure 4, violet bars). Good activity was seen with the set of α-, β- and γ-keto esters (n = 0–2). Moreover, it was established that all three of these biocatalytic reductions proceed with excellent facial selectivity, providing an efficient (84–93% isolated yields) and enantioselective (90–99% ee; D-configuration by optical rotation-see SI) entry into the corresponding α- (2), β- (4) and γ-hydroxy esters (6) (Figure 5). While other biocatalytic entries into 2,21, 22 4,22, 23 and 624 are known,25 the observed CaADH enantioselectivity is comparable, and the CaADH substrate scope compares favorarbly to these other systems.
Figure 5.
High facial selectivity observed for the CaADH-mediated reduction of α-,β- and γ-keto esters. The resulting D-ω-hydroxy esters are valuable chiral synthetic building blocks.
Inversion of such D-α- and β-hydroxy esters to the corresponding esters of L-α-phenyglycine26 and L-β3-phenylalanine27 is known. As is depicted in Figure 5, the former amino acid serves as a building block for peptides with anti-thrombotic28 and anti-arthritic29 potential. The L-β3-phenylalanine building block, in turn, is useful for the assembly of β-peptides,30 whereas the D-β-hydroxy ester obtained directly from the CaADH reduction serves is a precursor for the important anti-depressent, fluoxetine.31 Finally, the D-γ-hydroxy ester itself is a valuable chiron for the assembly of crytophycin,32 and L-γ4-homophenylalanine is as useful monomer for γ-peptides.33
We next sought to perform a similar reduction on α-halo-β-keto ester 13, in an effort to install two stereocenters. This strategy, pioneered by Stewart 34 (yeast) provides an efficient chemoenzymatic entry into the phenylisoserine side chain of the taxoid chemotherapeutics. In the event, CaADH performed exceptionally, delivering the desired α-chloro-β-hydroxy ester, 14, with proper relative (99% de) and absolute stereochemistry (95% ee) under DYRKR conditions (Fig. 6). Pleasingly, this level of stereochemical control was maintained on a gram scale. D-Glucose serves as biorenewable reductant regenerating NADPH under the aegis of GDH from T. acidophilum.
Figure 6.
Efficient DYRKR entry into the side chain for taxoid anti-cancer drugs, including taxol and taxotère.
Conclusions
In light of these results, it will be of interest to further mine the genome of this solventogentic bacterium and further explore the potential of this Clostridium acetobutylicum ADH. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-0911732) and the NCESR. R.W.C. thanks the Am. Chem. Soc. for a SURF Fellowship. (We thank the NSF (CHE-0091975, MRI-0079750) and the NIH (SIG-1-510-RR-06307) for NMR, and the NIH (RR016544) for lab renovation.
Figure 1.
Map of the C. acetobutylicum 192 KB megaplasmid, generated with Microbial Gene Viewer20(arrow indicates CaADH gene locus)
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Exptl details, NMR spectra and chiral HPLC traces.
References
- 1.(a) Gillingham DG, Stallforth P, Adibekian A, Seeberger PH, Hilvert D. Nat Chem. 2010;2:102–5. doi: 10.1038/nchem.504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Baer K, Dueckers N, Hummel W, Groeger H. ChemCatChem. 2010;2:939–42. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2751-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sugiyama M, Hong Z, Liang PH, Dean SM, Whalen LJ, Greenberg WA, Wong CH. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14811–17. doi: 10.1021/ja073911i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Gildersleeve J, Varvak A, Atwell S, Evans D, Schultz PG. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:5971–5973. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Reetz MT, Bocola M, Wang LW, Sanchis J, Cronin A, Arand M, Zou J, Archelas A, Bottalla AL, Naworyta A, Mowbray SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:7334–43. doi: 10.1021/ja809673d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jochens H, Stiba K, Savile C, Fujii R, Yu JG, Gerassenkov T, Kazlauskas RJ, Bornscheuer UT. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:3532–35. doi: 10.1002/anie.200806276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Fluxa VS, Wahler D, Reymond JL. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1270–7. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Wu S, Acevedo JP, Reetz MT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:2775–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911656107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rehdorf J, Mihovilovic MD, Bornscheuer UT. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:4506–4508. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Koehler V, Bailey KR, Znabet A, Raftery J, Helliwell M, Turner NJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:2182–4. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bailey KR, Ellis AJ, Reiss R, Snape TJ, Turner NJ. Chem Commun. 2007:3640–42. doi: 10.1039/b710456a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Reetz MT, Prasad S, Carballeira JD, Gumulya Y, Bocola M. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:9144–52. doi: 10.1021/ja1030479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Deska J, Baeckvall JE. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:3379–81. doi: 10.1039/b912128p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gorke JT, Srienc F, Kazlauskas RJ. Chem Commun. 2008:1235–37. doi: 10.1039/b716317g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Pennacchio A, Esposito L, Zagari A, Rossi M, Raia CA. Extremophiles. 2009;13:751–61. doi: 10.1007/s00792-009-0256-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Musa MM, Lott N, Laivenieks M, Watanabe L, Vieille C, Phillips RS. ChemCatChem. 2009;1:89–93. [Google Scholar]; (c) Voss CV, Gruber CC, Faber K, Knaus T, Macheroux P, Kroutil W. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13969–13972. doi: 10.1021/ja804816a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Savile CK, Janey JM, Mundorff EC, Moore JC, Tam S, Jarvis WR, Colbeck JC, Krebber A, Fleitz FJ, Brands J, Devine PN, Huisman GW, Hughes GJ. Science. 2010;329:305–309. doi: 10.1126/science.1188934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Berkowitz DB, Choi S, Maeng JH. J Org Chem. 2000;65:847–60. doi: 10.1021/jo991582+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Berkowitz DB, Hartung RE, Choi S. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 1999;10:4513–20. [Google Scholar]; (c) Berkowitz DB, Maeng JH, Dantzig AH, Shepard RL, Norman BH. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:9426–7. [Google Scholar]; (d) Berkowitz DB, Maeng JH. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 1996;7:1577–80. [Google Scholar]; (e) Berkowitz DB, Pumphrey JA, Shen Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:8743–6. [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Dey S, Powell DR, Hu C, Berkowitz DB. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:7010–14. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dey S, Karukurichi KR, Shen W, Berkowitz DB. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8610–11. doi: 10.1021/ja052010b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Berkowitz DB, Shen W, Maiti G. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 2004;15:2845–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2004.06.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Berkowitz DB, Maiti G. Org Lett. 2004;6:2661–4. doi: 10.1021/ol049159x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Berkowitz DB, Bose M, Choi S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:1603–7. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020503)41:9<1603::aid-anie1603>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Broussy S, Cheloha RW, Berkowitz DB. Org Lett. 2009;11:305–8. doi: 10.1021/ol802464g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Friest JA, Maezato Y, Broussy S, Blum P, Berkowitz DB. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:5930–31. doi: 10.1021/ja910778p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schaffer S, Isci N, Zickner B, Durre P. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:110–121. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200201)23:1<110::AID-ELPS110>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Lee JY, Jang YS, Lee J, Papoutsakis ET, Lee SY. Biotechnol J. 2009;4:1432–40. doi: 10.1002/biot.200900142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Berezina OV, Brandt A, Yarotsky S, Schwarz WH, Zverlov VV. Systematic Appl Microbiol. 2009;32:449–59. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cornillot E, Nair RV, Papoutsakis ET, Soucaille P. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5442–47. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.17.5442-5447.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Berezina OV, Zakharova NV, Brandt A, Yarotsky SV, Schwarz WH, Zverlov VV. App Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:635–46. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2480-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Inui M, Suda M, Kimura S, Yasuda K, Suzuki H, Toda H, Yamamoto S, Okino S, Suzuki N, Yukawa H. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;77:1305–16. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1257-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Steen EJ, Chan R, Prasad N, Myers S, Petzold CJ, Redding A, Ouellet M, Keasling JD. Microb Cell Fact. 2008;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-7-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Green EM, Kalil MS, Williams P, Stephens GM. Biotechnol Tech. 1994;8:733–738. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nolling J, Breton G, Omelchenko MV, Makarova KS, Zeng Q, et al. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:4823–4838. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.16.4823-4838.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yamamoto H, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61:133–139. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Welch RW, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989;273:309–318. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(89)90489-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kerkhoven R, van Enckevort FHJ, Boekhorst J, Molenaar D, Siezen RJ. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1812–1814. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo J, Mu X, Zheng C, Xu Y. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2009;84:1787–92. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhu D, Malik HT, Hua L. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 2006;17:3010–14. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Milagre CDF, Milagre HMS, Moran PJS, Rodrigues JAR. J Org Chem. 2010;75:1410–18. doi: 10.1021/jo902227f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Forzato C, Gandolfi R, Molinari F, Nitti P, Pitacco G, Valentin E. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 2001;12:1039–46. [Google Scholar]
- 25.(a) Qiu L, Kwong FY, Wu J, Lam WH, Chan S, Yu WY, Li YM, Guo R, Zhou Z, Chan ASC. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:5955–65. doi: 10.1021/ja0602694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Noyori R, Takaya H. Acc Chem Res. 1990;23:345. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feenstra RW, Stokkingreef EHM, Nivard RJF, Ottenheijm HCJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:1215–18. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rao AVR, Gurjar MK, Nallaganchu BR, Bhandari A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:7085–7088. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stilz HU, Guba W, Jablonka B, Just M, Klingler O, Koenig W, Wehner V, Zoller G. J Med Chem. 2001;44:1158–1176. doi: 10.1021/jm001068s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moffat DFC, Pintat S, Davies S Chr Ther. Ltd. WO. 2009:71.
- 30.(a) Choi SH, Guzei IA, Spencer LC, Gellman SH. J Am Chem Soc. 2010 ACS ASAP. [Google Scholar]; (b) Seebach D, Beck AK, Capone S, Deniau G, Groselj U, Zass E. Synthesis. 2009:1–32. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hilborn JW, Lu ZH, Jurgens AR, Fang QK, Byers P, Wald SA, Senanayake CH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:8919–8921. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ghosh AK, Swanson L. J Org Chem. 2003;68:9823–9826. doi: 10.1021/jo035077v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seebach D, Hook DF, Glattli A. Biopolymers. 2006;84:23–37. doi: 10.1002/bip.20391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Original concept: Cabon O, Buisson D, Larcheveque M, Azerad R. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 1995;6:2211–2218.Feske BD, Kaluzna IA, Stewart JD. J Org Chem. 2005;70:9654–9657. doi: 10.1021/jo0516077.






