Abstract
Mycobacterium interjectum is a nontuberculosis species rarely responsible for human infection. The draft genome of M. interjectum ATCC 51457T comprises 5,927,979 bp, exhibiting 67.91% G+C content, 5,314 protein-coding genes, and 51 predicted RNA genes.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Mycobacterium interjectum was delineated as a new species of nontuberculous mycobacteria most closely related to Mycobacterium simiae (1, 2), Mycobacterium saskatchewanense sp. nov. (3), and Mycobacterium paraense sp. nov. (4). M. interjectum is an opportunistic pathogen mainly isolated from diseased lymph nodes (1, 5–8) and the respiratory tract (5, 9–11). A few other cases have caused meningoencephalitis (12) and cutaneous infection (13). Also, M. interjectum has been isolated from mammals (14–16), fish (17, 18), and clear water (19, 20). It is therefore of medical and general interest to further describe the genome of this species, and we performed whole-genome sequencing of the M. interjectum ATCC 51457T strain. Genomic DNA isolated from M. interjectum grown in MGIT Middlebrook liquid culture (Becton, Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Claix, France) was sequenced in two Illumina MiSeq runs (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) using a 5.9-kb mate-paired library. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic (21) and assembled using Velvet (version 1.2.03) (22). Contigs were combined by SSPACE version 2 (23), Opera version 2 (24) helped by GapFiller version 1.10 (25), and homemade tools in Python to refine the set. The M. interjectum strain ATCC 51457T draft genome consists of 30 scaffolds and 221 contigs containing 5,927,979 bp and 67.91% G+C content. Noncoding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using RNAmmer (26), ARAGORN (27), Rfam (28), PFAM (29), and Infernal (30). Coding DNA sequences (CDSs) were predicted using Prodigal (31), and functional annotation was achieved using BLAST+ (32) and HMMER3 (33) against the UniProtKB database (34). The genome was shown to encode at least 51 predicted RNAs, including three rRNAs and 48 tRNAs. A total of 5,314 identified genes yielded a coding capacity of 4,706,163 bp (coding percentage, 79.3%). Among these genes, 4,431 (83.38%) were found to be putative proteins, and 883 (16.6%) were assigned as hypothetical proteins. Moreover, 3,056 genes matched a least one sequence in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups database (35, 36) with BLASTP default parameters. In silico DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) (37) was performed with 16 reference genomes selected on the basis of their 16S rRNA gene proximity with M. interjectum. The M. interjectum genome was locally aligned 2-by-2 using BLAT algorithm (38, 39) against each one of the 16 selected genomes, and DDH values were estimated from a generalized linear model (40). The DDH was 27.8% (±2.43%) for Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155, 26.70% (±2.42%) for Mycobacterium ulcerans Agy99, 25.9% (±2.41%) for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis K-10, Mycobacterium intracellulare ATCC 13950, and Mycobacterium indicus pranii MTCC 9506, 23.6% (±2.38%) for Mycobacterium kansasii ATCC 12478, 23.5% (±2.38%) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and Mycobacterium bovis AF2122/97, 22.4% (±2.36%) for Mycobacterium marinum M and Mycobacterium liflandii 128FXT, 20.9% (±2.33%) for Mycobacterium chubuense NBB4, 20.8% (±2.33%) for Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1, 20.5% (±2.32%) for Mycobacterium gilvum PYR-GCK, 20.4% (±2.32%) for Mycobacterium leprae TN and Mycobacterium neoaurum VKM Ac-1815D, and 20.2% (±2.31%) for Mycobacterium rhodesiae NBB3.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The M. interjectum strain ATCC 51457T genome sequence has been deposited at EMBL under the accession no. FJVQ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by URMITE, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Footnotes
Citation Levasseur A, Asmar S, Robert C, Drancourt M. 2016. Draft genome sequence of Mycobacterium interjectum strain ATCC 51457T. Genome Announc 4(3):e00452-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00452-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Springer B, Kirschner P, Rost-Meyer G, Schröder KH, Kroppenstedt RM, Böttger EC. 1993. Mycobacterium interjectum, a new species isolated from a patient with chronic lymphadenitis. J Clin Microbiol 31:3083–3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.De Zwaan R, van Ingen J, van Soolingen D. 2014. Utility of rpoB gene sequencing for identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria in the Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol 52:2544–2551. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00233-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Turenne CY, Thibert L, Williams K, Burdz TV, Cook VJ, Wolfe JN, Cockcroft DW, Kabani A. 2004. Mycobacterium saskatchewanense sp. nov., a novel slowly growing scotochromogenic species from human clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium interjectum and AccuProbe-positive for Mycobacterium avium complex. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:659–667. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02739-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fusco da Costa AR, Fedrizzi T, Lopes ML, Pecorari M, Oliveira da Costa WL, Giacobazzi E, da Costa Bahia JR, De Sanctis V, Batista Lima KV, Bertorelli R, Grottola A, Fabio A, Mariottini A, Ferretti P, Di Leva F, Fregni Serpini G, Tagliazucchi S, Rumpianesi F, Jousson O, Segata N, Tortoli E. 2015. Characterization of 17 strains belonging to the Mycobacterium simiae complex and description of Mycobacterium paraense sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:656–662. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.068395-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lumb R, Goodwin A, Ratcliff R, Stapledon R, Holland A, Bastian I. 1997. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of three clinical isolates of Mycobacterium interjectum. J Clin Microbiol 35:2782–2785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.De Baere T, Moerman M, Rigouts L, Dhooge C, Vermeersch H, Verschraegen G, Vaneechoutte M. 2001. Mycobacterium interjectum as causative agent of cervical lymphadenitis. J Clin Microbiol 39:725–727. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.2.725-727.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tuerlinckx D, Fauville-Dufaux M, Bodart E, Bogaerts P, Dupont B, Glupeczynski Y. 2010. Submandibular lymphadenitis caused by Mycobacterium interjectum: contribution of new diagnostic tools. Eur J Pediatr 169:505–508. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rose M, Kitz R, Mischke A, Enzensberger R, Schneider V, Zielen S. 2004. Lymphadenitis cervicalis due to Mycobacterium interjectum in immunocompetent children. Acta Paediatr 93:424–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02976.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martínez Lacasa J, Cuchi E, Font R. 2009. Mycobacterium interjectum as a cause of lung disease mimicking tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 13:1048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mirant-Borde MC, Alvarez S, Johnson MM. 2013. Mycobacterium interjectum lung infection. Case Rep Pulmonol 2013:193830. doi: 10.1155/2013/193830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Villanueva MÁ, Gullón JA, Álvarez-Navascués F. 2015. Mycobacterium interjectum lung infection: a case report. Arch Bronconeumol 51:155–156. doi: 10.1016/j.arbr.2014.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O’Dwyer JP, O’Connor JG, McDermott H, Sheehan S, Fanning NF, Corcoran GD, Sweeney B. 2009. Meningoencephalitis associated with non-tuberculous mycobacteria. BMJ Case Rep. bvr03:2009.1696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fukuoka M, Matsumura Y, Kore-eda S, Iinuma Y, Miyachi Y. 2008. Cutaneous infection due to Mycobacterium interjectum in an immunosuppressed patient with microscopic polyangiitis. Br J Dermatol 159:1382–1384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De Lisle GW, Kawakami RP, Yates GF, Collins DM. 2008. Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis and other mycobacterial species from ferrets and stoats. Vet Microbiol 132:402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zanetti S, Bua A, Molicotti P, Delogu G, Mura A, Ortu S, Sechi LA. 2008. Identification of mycobacterial infections in wild boars in Northern Sardinia, Italy. Acta Vet Hung 56:145–152. doi: 10.1556/AVet.56.2008.2.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bouts T, Vordermeier M, Flach E, Routh A. 2009. Positive skin and serologic test results of diagnostic assays for bovine tuberculosis and subsequent isolation of Mycobacterium interjectum in a pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis). J Zoo Wildl Med 40:536–542. doi: 10.1638/2008-0001.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rhodes MW, Kator H, Kaattari I, Gauthier D, Vogelbein W, Ottinger CA. 2004. Isolation and characterization of mycobacteria from striped bass Morone saxatilis from the Chesapeake Bay. Dis Aquat Organ 61:41–51. doi: 10.3354/dao061041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zanoni RG, Florio D, Fioravanti ML, Rossi M, Prearo M. 2008. Occurrence of Mycobacterium spp. in ornamental fish in Italy. J Fish Dis 31:433–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.00924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thomson RM, Carter R, Tolson C, Coulter C, Huygens F, Hargreaves M. 2013. Factors associated with the isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from a large municipal water system in Brisbane, Australia. BMC Microbiol 13:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Makovcova J, Slany M, Babak V, Slana I, Kralik P. 2014. The water environment as a source of potentially pathogenic mycobacteria. J Water Health 12:254–263. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lohse M, Bolger AM, Nagel A, Fernie AR, Lunn JE, Stitt M, Usadel B. 2012. RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40:W622–W627. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gao S, Sung WK, Nagarajan N. 2011. Opera: reconstructing optimal genomic scaffolds with high-throughput paired-end sequences. J Comput Biol 18:1681–1691. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2011.0170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2012. Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol 13:R56. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR. 2003. Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res 31:439–441. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D290–D301. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR. 2009. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25:1335–1337. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eddy SR. 2011. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.The UniProt Consortium 2011. Ongoing and future developments at the universal protein resource. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D214–D219. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28:33–36. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278:631–637. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kent WJ. 2002. BLAT—the blast-like alignment tool. Genome Res 12:656–664. doi: 10.1101/gr.229202 Article published online before March 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Auch AF, Von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2010. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
