Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 May 26;4(3):e00469-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00469-16

First Complete Genome Sequence of a Subdivision 6 Acidobacterium Strain

Sixing Huang 1,, Selma Vieira 1, Boyke Bunk 1, Thomas Riedel 1, Cathrin Spröer 1, Jörg Overmann 1
PMCID: PMC4882960  PMID: 27231379

Abstract

Although ubiquitous and abundant in soils, acidobacteria have mostly escaped isolation and remain poorly investigated. Only a few cultured representatives and just eight genomes of subdivisions 1, 3, and 4 are available to date. Here, we determined the complete genome sequence of strain HEG_-6_39, the first genome of Acidobacterium subdivision 6.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacteria belonging to the phylum Acidobacteria represent one of the dominant groups of soil bacteria, constituting an average fraction of 20% in 16S rRNA gene libraries (1). Despite their ubiquitous distribution and abundance, only a few Acidobacteria have so far been isolated in pure culture. As a result, little is known about their physiology and ecological functions in soil. Currently, 26 subdivisions have been proposed (2), and among them, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, and 6 are the most abundant in soils worldwide (1, 3). Prior to this study, no successful isolation of subdivision 6 acidobacteria had been reported.

Strain HEG_-6_39 was isolated from grassland soil in the German Biodiversity Exploratories (4). Genome sequencing was carried out on the PacBio RSII (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA) using P6 chemistry. Genome assembly was performed with the “RS_HGAP_Assembly.3” protocol included in the SMRT Portal version 2.3.0, utilizing 97,934 postfiltered reads, with an average read length of 13,738 bp. One complete chromosomal contig was obtained and trimmed, circularized, and adjusted to dnaA (locustag_00001) as the first gene. A final genome quality of QV60 was determined during resequencing using the RS_BridgeMapper.1 protocol in SMRT Portal. In addition, genome sequencing was carried out on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Francisco, CA) in a 100-bp paired-end single-indexed run, resulting in 3.2 million paired-end reads. Quality improvement was performed with the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (5), mapping the Illumina reads onto the obtained chromosome. Protein-coding regions, 16S rRNA, and tRNA genes were scanned and annotated with Prokka (6). The genome was also uploaded to the RAST (7) service for comparative analysis. Metabolic pathways were identified online at KEGG (8), with subsequent manual gap filling.

The genome contained 7,480,314 bp and 6,295 predicted protein-coding genes. The G+C content was 64.7%. Only one rRNA operon was found. In addition, like other bacterial genomes, one transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) gene was found. The RAST annotation recognized one-third of the coding sequences (CDSs) as subsystem related. The most populated subsystem categories were carbohydrates (401), amino acids and derivatives (389), and RNA metabolism (184).

It is noteworthy that the genome contains 104 glycoside hydrolases and 183 peptidases. The complete gene sets for assimilatory nitrate reduction and sulfite reduction were found. Also identified are detoxification operons against arsenate, arsenite, antimonite, cobalt, zinc, lead, cadmium, and mercury. Antimicrobial resistance genes, such as mdtABC drug exporter genes, were also found. The HEG_-6_39 genome contains three cold-shock protein genes, cspADE, and two pathways for trehalose biosynthesis.

The availability of high-quality genome sequences for Acidobacteria, particularly those belonging to subdivision 6, will improve our understanding of the functional implication of these organisms in the soil environment.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence has been deposited at GenBank under the accession no. CP015136.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the managers of the three exploratories, Kirsten Reichel-Jung, Swen Renner, Katrin Hartwich, Sonja Gockel, Kerstin Wiesner, and Martin Gorke, for their work in maintaining the plot and project infrastructure, Christiane Fischer and Simone Pfeiffer for giving support through the central office, Michael Owonibi for managing the central database, and Markus Fischer, Eduard Linsenmair, Dominik Hessenmöller, Jens Nieschulze, Daniel Prati, Ingo Schöning, François Buscot, Ernst-Detlef Schulze, Wolfgang W. Weisser, and the late Elisabeth Kalko for their role in setting up the Biodiversity Exploratories project.

The work has been (partly) funded by the DFG Priority Program 1374 “Infrastructure-Biodiversity-Exploratories” (grant OV 20/21-1). Field work permits were issued by the responsible state environmental offices of Baden-Württemberg, Thüringen, and Brandenburg (according to § 72 BbgNatSchG).

Footnotes

Citation Huang S, Vieira S, Bunk B, Riedel T, Spröer C, Overmann J. 2016. First complete genome sequence of a subdivision 6 Acidobacterium strain. Genome Announc 4(3):e00469-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00469-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Janssen PH. 2006. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1719–1728. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1719-1728.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barns SM, Cain EC, Sommerville L, Kuske CR. 2007. Acidobacteria phylum sequences in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments greatly expand the known diversity within the phylum. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3113–3116. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02012-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barns SM, Takala SL, Kuske CR. 1999. Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1731–1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fischer M, Bossdorf O, Gockel S, Hänsel F, Hemp A, Hessenmöller D, Korte G, Nieschulze J, Pfeiffer S, Prati D, Renner S, Schöning I, Schumacher U, Wells K, Buscot F, Kalko EKV, Linsenmair KE, Schulze E, Weisser WW. 2010. Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the biodiversity exploratories. Basic Appl Ecol 11:473–485. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li H, Durbin R. 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M. 1999. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 27:29–34. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES