Abstract
Twenty manzamine amides were synthesized and evaluated for in vitro antimalarial and antimicrobial activities. The amides of manzamine A (1) showed significantly reduced cytotoxicity against Vero cells, although were less active than 1. The structure–activity analysis showed that linear, short alkyl groups adjacent to the amide carbonyl at position 8 are favored for antimalarial activity, while bulky and cyclic groups at position 6 provided the most active amides. Most of the amides showed potent activity against Mycobacterium intracellulare. The antimicrobial activity profile for position 8 series was similar to that for antimalarial activity profile, in which linear, slightly short alkyl groups adjacent to the amide carbonyl showed improved activity. Two amides 14 and 21, which showed potent antimalarial activity in vitro against Plasmodium falciparum were further evaluated in vivo in Plasmodium berghei infected mice. Oral administration of 14 and 21 at the dose of 30 mg/kg (once daily for three days) caused parasitemia suppression of 24% and 62%, respectively, with no apparent toxicity.
Keywords: Manzamine alkaloids, Amidation, Antimalaria
1. Introduction
When the resistance to chloroquine has spread around the world, the era of inexpensive and available antimalarial drugs had ended.1 This, in addition to the fact that artemisinins are the only first-line antimalarial drugs that are still effective against all chloroquine-resistance malaria parasites has driven the scientific community and funding agencies to invest additional time and resources for the development of new antimalarial drugs. Malaria causes more than one million deaths every year.2 The process of drug discovery includes three major stages: (1) target identification and high throughput screening of small molecules (2) lead identification and optimization, and (3) preclinical and clinical studies.2 Nature has served as the mine for structurally diverse small molecules utilized for target identification for human diseases. Over 63% of the bioactive small molecules reported between 1981 and 2006 are either natural, natural product derived or inspired from natural compounds.3 The manzamine alkaloids (Fig. 1) represent a unique class of natural products that have shown a diverse range of bioactivities, including antimicrobial,4–7 antiparasitic,8 cytotoxicity,9,10 anti-inflammatory,11 pesticidial,12 and were shown to possess activity against HIV-1 and AIDS opportunistic infections.13 They are particularly attractive candidates for optimization for the control of infectious diseases.14 The first representative of this family is manzamine A (1) isolated in 1986 by Higa.10 This family has the unique structural feature of having complex polycyclic ring systems coupled with a β-carboline moiety. Manzamine A (1) and its 8-hydroxy derivative (2), showed the most promising antimalarial activity within this class of compounds. Both showed improved potency against the malaria parasite in vitro and in vivo over the clinically used drugs chloroquine and artemisinin.15 Oral treatment of 1 (2 × 100 μmol/kg) and 2 (2 × 100 μmol/kg) showed 90% reduction in parasitemia. Mice treated with a single dose (50 or 100 μmol/kg) of 1 or 2 also showed significant improvements in survival times over mice treated with chloroquine or artemisinin.16 This data revealed significant promise for the development of this new class of antimalarial drugs. However, the major drawback of this class of compounds is the toxicity associated with higher dosing schedules. The mechanism of action of 1 as an antimalarial agent is not clear and requires intensive structure–activity relationship (SAR) study for a better understanding of the importance of each moiety of this complex molecule for the antimalarial activity. The first intensive SAR study on manzamine alkaloids was completed by our group and focused on exploring the different functional groups around the molecule.17 This included reduction of the double bonds in the complex polycyclic ring systems, N-oxidation, 9N-alkylation, 8O-alkylation in 2 and reduction of the carbonyl group in manzamine F (3). In addition, ircinal (4) was coupled with substituted tryptamines through Pictet–Spengler cyclization. Several analogues were synthesized in this study with good antimalarial activity but without improvement in regard to cytotoxicity. Experimental evidence that manzamines arrest the cell cycle in the S phase17 suggests that this toxicity may be due to DNA intercalation by the planer β-carboline moiety. However, no significant modifications of the β-carboline were completed until this study.
Figure 1.
Manzamine alkaloids.
In this study, we focused our modification on the β-carboline moiety of 1 as an extension to the previous study for lead optimization as an antimalarial agent. Twenty amides of 1 which differ at positions 6 and 8 in the β-carboline moiety have been synthesized. These amides were evaluated for in vitro and in vivo antimalarial activity in addition to in vitro antimicrobial activity.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Chemistry
Manzamine A (1) in addition to 2, 3, and 4 were purified from the Indonesian sponge Acanthostrongylophora sp. through an optimized isolation procedure.13 Positions 6 and 8 of the β-carboline moiety in 1 could be chemically modified via electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions, due to the activation by the secondary amine functionality in the indole part of the β-carboline moiety. We began our modifications by nitrating the benzene ring of the β-carboline moiety with NaNO2 in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (Scheme 1). This yielded two nitro products, 6-nitromanzamine A (3a), and 8-nitromanzamine A (3b). The stability of these two nitromanzamine A products, and the feasibility of converting the nitro group to a different functional groups were the main reasons for selecting nitromanzamines as key intermediates for synthesizing additional analogues at positions 6 and 8. Large-scale nitration of 1 and the purification of both nitro products 3a,b were carried out to provide starting material for additional analogues. Both nitro products were reduced to the corresponding 6 and 8-aminomanzamine A (4a,b) in almost complete conversion (by LC–MS). However, low yield of the amines were recovered after workup step due to their instability, even as the hydrochloric salts. In addition, aminomanzamines were unstable in solution, especially in the presence of chloroform or dichloromethane. This lack of stability created challenges in regard to the yields of the amidation reaction. Adding to the challenge is the conjugation with the remaining two nitrogens of the β-carboline which appear to produce a highly basic amine after reduction of the nitro group.
Scheme 1.
Nitration of manzamine A.
Amidation of aminomanzamines at positions 6 and 8 were carried out by reacting the amines as a hydrochloric acid salts with a slight excess of different acyl chlorides in the presence of the catalyst DMAP, and the base triethylamine at room temperature in dry THF under nitrogen atmosphere (Scheme 2). Twenty amides were synthesized in both positions with yields ranging between ~12% and 17%. The structures of the amidated manzamine A series were confirmed by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy (Table 1).
Scheme 2.
General procedure for amidation of manzamine. Reagents and conditions: (a) Zn, AcOH/MeOH (5%), rt, 10 min; (b) 1 equiv concd HCl; (c) 1.2 equiv RCOCl, 1 equiv Et3N, cat. DMAP, THF, rt, 1 h.
Table 1.
The synthesized manzamine A amides
| Compound | R | Entry | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-Acetamidomanzamine A | CH3 | 5 | 14 |
| 8-Acetamidomanzamine A | 15 | 13 | |
| 6-n-Propamidomanzamine A |
|
6 | 14 |
| 8-n-Propamidomanzamine A | 16 | 14 | |
| 6-n-Butamidomanzamine A |
|
7 | 14 |
| 8-n-Butamidomanzamine A | 17 | 14 | |
| 6-Isobutamidomanzamine A |
|
8 | 12 |
| 8-Isobutamidomanzamine A | 18 | 14 | |
| 6-n-Pentamidomanzamine A |
|
9 | 13 |
| 8-n-Pentamidomanzamine A | 19 | 15 | |
| 6-Pivalamidomanzamine A |
|
10 | 12 |
| 8-Pivalamidomanzamine A | 20 | 12 | |
| 6-n-Hexamidomanzamine A |
|
11 | 14 |
| 8-n-Hexamidomanzamine A | 21 | 14 | |
| 6-n-Octamidomanzamine A |
|
12 | 12 |
| 8-n-Octamidomanzmaine A | 22 | 15 | |
| 6-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A |
|
13 | 15 |
| 8-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A | 23 | 14 | |
| 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A |
|
14 | 17 |
| 8-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A | 24 | 16 |
2.2. In vitro antimalarial activity
All amides were evaluated in vitro for antimalarial activity against chloroquine sensitive (D6, Sierra Leone) and resistant (W2, IndoChina) clones of Plasmodium falciparum. In addition, they were also tested for toxicity on normal African green monkey kidney fibroblast cells (Vero) (Table 2). Manzamine A (1) showed the highest activity with an IC50 of 8.0 nM (D6 clone) and 11 nM (W2 clone). This activity is more potent than the standard antimalarials chloroquine and artemisinin which show an IC50 values of 50 nM and 46 nM, respectively, against the D6 clone. Manzamine A (1) has a TC50 of 365 nM against Vero cells, providing therapeutic indexes of 44 (D6 clone) and 25 (W2 clone).18 Like manzamine A almost all the amides showed similar antimalarial activity against D6 and W2 clones of P. falciparum. Introduction of an acetamido functionality at position 8 (15) reduced the antimalarial activity to an IC50 of 182 nM against D6 clone. Increasing the length of the alkyl chain adjacent to the amide carbonyl (2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 carbons) (16, 17, 19, 21 and 22) in position 8 series showed improvement in in vitro antimalarial activity with IC50 values of 123, 35, 53, 32, and 55 nM, respectively, against D6 clone. Branched alkyl groups adjacent to the amide carbonyl were not favored at position 8. For example, 8-isobutamidomanzamine A (18) showed reduced activity with IC50 values of 158 and 205 nM, against D6 and W2 clones, respectively. This is relative to 8-n-butamidomanzamine A (17, 35 nM against D6), which has the same number of carbon atoms as a linear chain. Similar results were obtained when adding bulkier groups such as t-butyl either directly attached to the amide carbonyl (20, IC50 = 170 and 232 nM against D6 and W2 clones, respectively) or separated by one carbon as in 8-t-butylacetamidomanzamine A (23, IC50 = 139 and 127 nM against D6 and W2 clones, respectively). Furthermore, adding a cyclohexyl group as in 8-cyclohexamidomanzamine A (24) markedly diminished the antimalarial activity (IC50 = 950 and 995 nM against D6 and W2 clones, respectively). This data suggests that relatively short linear alkyl groups (2–7 carbons) attached to the amide carbonyl at position 8 are preferred over branched and bulky groups for antimalarial activity.
Table 2.
In vitro antimalarial activity of manzamine amides against chloroquine sensitive (D6, Sierra Leone) and resistant (W2, IndoChina) strains of Plasmodium falciparum
| Compound | Entry |
P. falciparum (D6 Clone) IC50 (nM) |
P. falciparum (W2 Clone) IC50 (nM) |
Cytotoxicity (Vero) IC50 (nM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-Acetamidomanzamine A | 5 | 1288 | 1982 | NC |
| 8-Acetamidomanzamine A | 15 | 182 | 231 | NC |
| 6-n-Propamidomanzamine A | 6 | 1162 | 1937 | NC |
| 8-n-Propamidomanzamine A | 16 | 123 | 87 | NC |
| 6-n-Butamidomanzamine A | 7 | 1152 | 1894 | NC |
| 8-n-Butamidomanzamine A | 17 | 35 | 121 | NC |
| 6-Isobutamidomanzamine A | 8 | 1105 | 1547 | NC |
| 8-Isobutamidomanzamine A | 18 | 158 | 205 | NC |
| 6-n-Pentamidomanzamine A | 9 | 1235 | 1482 | NC |
| 8-n-Pentamidomanzamine A | 19 | 53 | 49 | NC |
| 6-Pivalamidoanzamine A | 10 | 231 | 417 | NC |
| 8-Pivalamidomanzamine A | 20 | 170 | 232 | NC |
| 6-n-Hexamidomanzamine A | 11 | 680 | 786 | NC |
| 8-n-Hexamidomanzamine A | 21 | 32 | 65 | NC |
| 6-n-Octamidomanzamine A | 12 | 696 | 754 | NC |
| 8-n-Octamidomanzamine A | 22 | 55 | 43 | NC |
| 6-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A | 13 | 211 | 302 | NC |
| 8-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A | 23 | 139 | 127 | NC |
| 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A | 14 | 34 | 53 | NC |
| 8-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A | 24 | 950 | 995 | NC |
| Manzamine A | 1 | 8.0 | 11 | 365 |
| 8-Hydroxymanzamine A | 2 | 11 | 14 | |
| Chloroquine | 50 | 484 | — | |
| Artemisinin | 46 | 28 | — |
NC, no cytotoxicity up to 470 nM.
The antimalarial activity profile for position 6 amides was completely opposite to that of the amides at position 8. The acetamido group at position 6 drastically eliminated the antimalarial activity (5, IC50 = 1288 and 1982 nM against D6 and W2 clones, respectively). Increasing the number of carbons attached to the amide carbonyl (2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 carbons) 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12 also resulted in similar reduction in the antimalarial activity with IC50 values of 1162, 1152, 1235, 680 and 696 nM against D6, respectively. The amide with an isopropyl group attached to the amide carbonyl 8 also showed reduced antimalarial activity (IC50s of 1105 and 1547 nM against D6 and W2 clones, respectively). Addition of a t-butyl group at position 6 slightly improved the activity as in 6-pivalamidomanzamine A (10) and 6-t-butylacetamidomanzamine A (13) with IC50 values of 231 and 211 nM against D6, compared to the linear alkyl groups. 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A (14) showed the best antimalarial activity among the 6-amide series with an IC50 = 34 nM against D6 clone. This data suggests that bulky groups at position 6 are preferred for antimalarial activity. It was interesting to note that all the amides in both series (6 and 8) did not show cytotoxicity to Vero cells.
2.3. In vivo antimalarial activity
With the objective of finding the analogues with reduced toxicity and equivalent or better antimalarial activity as compared to manzamine A, the two most potent amides, 6-cyclohexamido-manzamine A (14, IC50 = 34 nM) and 8-n-hexamidomanzamine A (21, IC50 = 32 nM) were evaluated in vivo in a P. berghei mouse malaria model. The treatment with compounds 14 and 21 through oral administration caused only moderate suppression in parasitemia of 24% and 62%, respectively, at three doses (once daily for three days) of 30 mg/kg with no apparent toxicity. These results indicate that the amides 14 and 21 were less toxic in vivo; however, their antimalarial potency in vivo was also compromised, as compared to manzamine A.
2.4. In vitro antimicrobial activity
In vitro antimicrobial activities of the manzamine amides were investigated against Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Cryptococcus neoformans, Mycobacterium intracellulare and Aspergillus fumigatus (Table 3).
Table 3.
In vitro antimicrobial data of manzamine amides (all values in μM)
| Compound | Entry | IC50/MIC
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. albicans | C. neoformans | M. intracellulre | A. fumigatus | ||
| 6-Acetamidomanzamine A | 5 | —/— | —/— | 9.911/16.51 | —/— |
| 8-Acetamidomanzamine A | 15 | —/— | 33.35/— | 1.651/2.064 | —/— |
| 6-n-Propamidomanzamine A | 6 | —/— | —/— | 5.650/8.071 | —/— |
| 8-n-Propamidomanzamine A | 16 | >32.28/— | NT/NT | 1.517/2.018 | >32.28/— |
| 6-n-Butamidomanzamine A | 7 | —/— | —/— | 4.736/7.893 | —/— |
| 8-n-Butamidomanzamine A | 17 | —/— | 23.68/— | 0.868/1.973 | —/— |
| 6-Isobutamidomanzamine A | 8 | —/— | —/— | 3.157/3.946 | —/— |
| 8-Isobutamidomanzamine A | 18 | —/— | 3.157/— | 1.026/1.973 | —/— |
| 6-n-Pentamidomanzamine A | 9 | —/— | —/— | 2.316/3.861 | —/— |
| 8-n-Pentamidomanzamine A | 19 | —/— | 4.633/— | 0.695/0.973 | —/— |
| 6-Pivalamidomanzamine A | 10 | —/— | —/— | 1.544/3.861 | —/— |
| 8-Pivalamidomanzamine A | 20 | —/— | —/— | 0.54/0.973 | —/— |
| 6-n-Hexamidomanzamine A | 11 | —/— | —/— | 15.12/30.22 | —/— |
| 8-n-Hexamidomanzamine A | 21 | —/— | 3.779/— | 0.030/0.468 | —/— |
| 6-n-Octamidomanzamine A | 12 | —/— | —/— | 17.40/29.01 | —/— |
| 8-n-Octamidomanzamine A | 22 | —/— | 1.015/29.01 | 0.508/1.813 | —/— |
| 6-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A | 13 | —/— | —/— | 1.360/1.889 | —/— |
| 8-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A | 23 | —/— | 14.36/— | 1.511/3.779 | —/— |
| 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A | 14 | —/— | 22.27/— | 1.262/1.856 | —/— |
| 8-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A | 24 | —/— | —/— | 11.14/14.85 | —/— |
| Manzamine A | 1 | 3.656 | 1.848 | 0.640 | |
| 8-Hydroxymanzamine A | 2 | 6.205 | 3.546 | 0.177 | |
| Amphotericin B | 0.487/1.352 | 0.920/2.705 | 1.623/2.701 | ||
| Ciprofloxacin | 1.056 | ||||
IC50, the concentration that affords 50% inhibition of growth; minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest test concentration that allows no detectable growth; amphotericin B and ciprofloxacin are used as positive antifungal and antibacterial controls, respectively, ‘— not’ active, ‘NT’ not tested.
2.4.1. Bioactivity against M. intracellulare
Manzamine A (1) showed potent activity against M. intracellulare with an IC50 value of 0.640 μM which is slightly more potent than ciprofloxacin, (IC50 = 1.056 μM). The amides at position 6 with linear alkyl groups (5, 6, 7, 9 and 11) showed significantly reduced activity against M. intracellulare with IC50 values of 9.911 5.650, 4.736, 2.316 and 15.12 μM, respectively. Similar results were obtained when adding branched acyclic alkyl groups such as isopropyl (8, IC50 = 3.157 μM). 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A (14) and 6-pivalamidomanzamine A (10) showed improved activities within the amides of the position 6 series with IC50 values of 1.262 and 1.544 μM, respectively. These results indicated that amidation at position 6 is not favorable for activity against M. intracellulare. Position 8 analogues showed better antimycobacterial potency compared to the position 6 series. The amide with acetamido (15) and propamido (16) groups at position 8 showed moderate activities with an IC50’s of 1.651 and 1.517 μM, respectively. 8-n-Butamidomanzamine A (17), 8-isobutamidomanzamine A (18) and 8-n-pentamidomanzamine A (19) showed activities close to manzamine A (1) and the control with IC50 values of 0.868, 1.026 and 0.695 μM, respectively, while 8-n-octamidomanzamine A (22) was slightly more potent than manzamine (IC50 = 0.508 μM). 8-n-Hexamidomanzamine A (21) was the most potent amide with an IC50 of 0.030 μM, which is one order of magnitude more potent than the control as well as 1. Marked loss of activity in 8-cyclohexamidomanzamine A (24, IC50 = 11.14 μM) suggests that linear acyclic alkyl groups as the amide functionality at position 8 are more favorable than bulkier groups, which is similar to the activity profile for antimalarial activity.
2.4.2. Bioactivity against C. neoformans
All the amides were screened for anticryptococcal activity against C. neoformans. The amides were either not active (5–13 and 24) or showed lower activity compared to 1 (IC50 = 1.848 μM). None of the amides were active against C. albicans, E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, 20 manzamine amides 5–24 have been synthesized and were screened in vitro for antimalarial and antibacterial activities. Amidation at positions 6 and 8 was a good choice for eliminating the toxicity associated with manzamine A, since all the amides (5–24) did not show cytotoxicity in Vero assay. In general, the amides were less active than 1. Some amides such as (14, 17 and 21) showed the best antimalarial activities among the amide series with IC50 values of 34, 34, and 32 nM against P. falciparum, respectively. Our structure–activity relationship study showed that linear, short alkyl groups adjacent to the amide carbonyl at position 8 are favored for antimalarial activity, while bulky and cyclic groups at position 6 appear to be the best choice for achieving better activity. Two of the most active amides, 14 and 21, were evaluated in vivo in a P. berghei mouse malaria model. Oral administration of 14 and 21 at the dose of 30 mg/kg (once daily for three days) caused parasitemia suppression of 24% and 62%, respectively, with no apparent toxicity.
Most of the amides showed potent activity against M. intracellulare. The activity profile for the position 8 series was similar to that for the antimalarial activity profile, in which linear, slightly short alkyl groups adjacent to the amide carbonyl showed improved activity. 8-n-Hexamidomanzamine A (21) was the most potent amide with an IC50 of 0.030 μM which is one order of magnitude more potent than the control. The potency of 21 against M. intracellulare will encourage us to continue investigating this amide in animals. Position 6 analogues 5–14 were less potent than those at position 8 against M. intracellulare. 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A (14) and 10 showed improved activities within position 6 series with an IC50 of 1.485 and 1.312 μM, respectively, which was similar to the activity profile of antimalarial activity for position 6 amides.
4. Experimental section
4.1. General experimental procedures
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a Bruker DRX NMR spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 75 MHz for 13C. Chemical shift (δ) values are expressed in parts per million (ppm) and are referenced to the residual solvent signals of CDCl3. UV and IR spectra were respectively obtained using a Perkin–Elmer Lambda 3B UV–vis spectrophotometer and an AATI Mattson Genesis series FTIR instrument. Optical rotations were measured with a JASCO DIP-310 digital polarimeter. The high resolution ESI-MS spectra were measured using a Bruker Daltonic (GmbH, Germany) micro-TOF series with electrospray ionization. TLC analysis was carried out on precoated silica gel G254 aluminum plates.
4.1.1. Nitration of manzamine A
Manzamine A (1) (5 g, 9.12 mmol) was dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (133 mL, 1.79 mmol), and kept at 0 °C with stirring for 30 min. Sodium nitrite (1 g, 14.5 mmol) was added in one portion and allowed to stir at 0 °C for an additional 3 h. The reaction mixture was poured into water and neutralized by ammonium hydroxide producing a precipitate that was filtered and dried. The crude nitro products of manzamine A (4.50 g) were loaded onto a column packed with 450 g of silica gel. 6-Nitromanzamine A (3a) eluted first using 99:1 DCM/MeOH followed by 8-nitromanzamine A (3b) after the mobile phase polarity was increased with 95:5 DCM/MeOH.
4.1.1.1. 6-Nitromanzamine A (3a)
Compound 3a (2.50 g, 46%); yellow powder; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.04 (1H, d, J = 2.0), 8.50 (1H, d, J = 5.2), 8.40 (1H, dd, J = 9.2, 2.0), 7.89 (1H, d, J = 5.2), 7.77 (1H, d, J = 9.2), 6.50 (1H, s), 6.21 (1H, s), 5.62 (m), 5.42 (t, J = 10.8), 4.70 (br), 3.69 (s), 3.25 (1H, t, J = 11.0), 2.93 (d, J = 9.0), 2.80–2.20 (m), 2.10–1.20 (m); HRESIMS m/z calcd for C36H44N5O3 (M+H+) 594.3444, found 594.3439.
4.1.1.2. 8-Nitromanzamine A (3b)
Compound 3b (2.35 g, 43%) yellow powder; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 10.40 (1H, s), 8.57 (1H, d, J = 5.2), 8.48 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.45 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 7.87 (1H, d, J = 5.2), 7.40 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 6.45 (1H, s), 5.96 (1H, m), 5.69 (1H, m), 5.55 (1H, m), 5.32 (1H, t, J = 10.0), 4.27 (1H, br), 3.58 (1H, s), 3.11 (1H, m), 2.61 (m), 2.50–1.6 (m), 1.4 (m); HRESIMS m/z calcd for C36H44N5O3 (M+H+) 594.3444, found 594.3439.
4.1.1.3. Reduction of nitromanzamines
6-Nitromanzamine A (3) or 8-nitromanzamine A (4) (118.6 mg, 0.21 mmol) were dissolved in methanol (5 mL). Zinc (50.0 mg) and 5% acetic acid in methanol (5 mL) were added to the nitromanzamines solution, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at room temperature. After complete conversion of the nitro products into the corresponding amine (monitored by TLC), concd HCl was added drop wise till no further precipitate was formed. The precipitate was collected by filtration and used for the following reactions without further purification.
4.1.2. General preparation of the amide products
6-Aminomanzamine A or 8-aminomanzamine A (100 mg, 0.17 mmol) and catalytic amount of DMAP were dissolved in anhydrous THF (3 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere. Triethylamine Et3N (25 μL, 0.17 mmol) was then added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. The desired acid chloride was added in excess, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. The completion of the reaction was monitored by TLC, then the reaction was quenched with water, and the product(s) were extracted by DCM (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and then evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude amide derivatives were first purified by silica column chromatography using hexane/acetone (9:1). Further purification was carried out on a Phenomenex Luna C8 250 × 10 mm, 5 μm Luna reverse- phase HPLC column using gradient CH3CN (0.1% TFA)/water (0.1% TFA) with flow rate of 6 mL/min to gave the pure amide derivative.
4.1.2.1. 6-Acetamidomanzamine A (5)
Compound 5 (15 mg, 14%); 12.9 (c 0.11, MeOH); UV λmax (MeOH) 260, 310, 375 nm; IR neat: 3232 (br), 2935, 2580, 1978, 1703, 1665,1538, 1470, 1437, 1365, 1290, 1178, 1130, 1018 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.65 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m) 2.08 (s), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 31.21, 39.16, 33.62, 28.45, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 23.97, 20.73; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C38H49N5O2 (M+H)+ 606.3743, found 606.3784.
4.1.2.2. 6-n-Propamidomanzamine A (6)
Compound 6 (16 mg, 14%); 17.1 (c 0.15, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.33 (1H, s), 8.66 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.31 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.67 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.29 (1H, m), 5.56 (1H, m), 5.43 (1H, t, J = 4.2), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.69 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.41 (2H, q, J = 7.2), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 1.14 (3H, t, J = 7.2); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 31.21, 39.16, 33.62, 30.36, 28.45, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.73, 9.86; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C39H50N5O2 (M+H)+ 620.3936, found 620.3942.
4.1.2.3. 6-n-Butamidomanzamine A (7)
Compound 7 (16 mg, 14%); 11.9 (c 0.11, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.25 (1H, s), 8.70 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.30 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.75 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.62 (1H, s), 6.25 (1H, m), 5.54 (1H, m), 5.39 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.92 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.00 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.66 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.37 (2H, t, J = 7.0), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 1.00 (3H, t, J = 7.1); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 171.45, 166.03, 143.69, 141.99, 141.16, 138.32, 137.62, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 40.09, 31.21, 39.16, 33.62, 30.36, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.73, 19.72, 14.52; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C40H52N5O2 (M+H)+ 634.4129, found 634.4425.
4.1.2.4. 6-Isobutamidomanzamine A (8)
Compound 8 (14 mg, 12%); 20.5 (c 0.21, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.41 (1H, s), 8.57 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.30 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.69 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.59 (1H, s), 6.30 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.63 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 1.29 (6H, d, J = 7.2); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 40.9, 31.21, 39.16, 35.64, 33.62, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.73, 20.06, 19.86; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C40H52N5O2 (M+H)+ 634.4129, found 634.4045.
4.1.2.5. 6-n-Pentamidomanzamine A (9)
Compound 9 (15 mg, 13%); 9.9 (c 0.15, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.65 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.1), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.39 (2H, t, J = 7.2), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 0.99 (3H, t, J = 7.1); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 31.21, 39.16, 37.47, 27.83, 33.62, 30.36, 29.68, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 22.44, 20.87, 13.84; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C41H54N5O2 (M+H)+ 648.4277, found 648.4550.
4.1.2.6. 6-Pivalamidomanzamine A (10)
Compound 10 (14 mg, 12%); 31.6 (c 0.21, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.65 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.0), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.49 (9H, s), 1.48 (m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 39.31, 39.16, 33.62, 29.69, 28.45, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.73; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C41H54N5O2 (M+H)+ 648.4277, found 648.4550.
4.1.2.7. 6-n-Hexamidomanzamine A (11)
Compound 11 (17 mg, 14%); 36.1 (c 0.25, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.65 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.0), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.56 (2H, t, J = 7.1), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 0.94 (3H, t, J = 7.0); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.39, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 31.21, 39.16, 37.47, 32.11, 29.68, 27.12, 26.78, 26.40, 25.54, 25.28, 24.90, 23.05, 21.34, 14.22; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C42H56N5O2 (M+H)+ 662.4488, found 662.4448.
4.1.2.8. 6-n-Octamidomanzamine A (12)
Compound 12 (15 mg, 12%); 25.4 (c 0.12, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.65 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.46 (2H, t, J = 7.2), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 0.90 (3H, t, J = 7.1); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 176.14, 166.69, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 38.60, 37.47, 31.61, 29.68, 28.17, 26.78, 26.40, 25.54, 25.28, 24.90, 22.82, 21.34, 14.47; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C44H60N5O2 (M+H)+ 690.4732, found 690.4785.
4.1.2.9. 6-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A (13)
Compound 13 (18 mg, 15%); 21.5 (c 0.10, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.65 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, s), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6, 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J =8.0), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.24 (2H, s), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.02 (9H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.89, 166.03, 143.51, 142.09, 142.01, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 39.3, 33.62, 31.65, 29.69, 28.80, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.73; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C42H56N5O2 (M+H)+ 662.4425, found 662.4451.
4.1.2.10. 6-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A (14)
Compound 14 (20 mg, 17%); 18.5 (c 0.13, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.33 (1H, s), 9.02 (1H, s), 8.53 (1H, s), 8.22 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.76 (1H, d, J =7.5), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.46 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.08 (1H, m), 5.51 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.77 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 3.84 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.66 (1H, s), 3.26 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 2.91 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.78 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.60, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 39.16, 33.62, 28.45, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 23.97, 20.73; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C43H56N5O2 (M+H)+ 674.4434, found 674.4464.
4.1.2.11. 8-Acetamidomanzamine A (15)
Compound 15 (14 mg, 13%); 16.2 (c 0.15, MeOH); UV λmax (MeOH) 260, 310, 375 nm; IR neat: 3232, 2935, 2580, 1703, 1665, 1538, 1470, 1437, 1365, 1290, 1178, 1130, 1018 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.37 (1H, s), 8.52 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.33 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.82 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.23 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.64 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1) 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m) 2.08 (3H, s), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 174.04, 166.01, 143.27, 141.95, 141.80, 138.64, 136.00, 134.49, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 31.21, 39.16, 33.62, 28.45, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 23.97, 20.73; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C38H49N5O2 (M+H)+ 606.3843, found 606.3811.
4.1.2.12. 8-n-Propamidomanzamine A (16)
Compound 16 (15 mg, 14%); 6.1 (c 0.09, MeOH);); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.38 (1H, s), 8.51 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.78 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.29 (1H, m), 5.56 (1H, m), 5.43 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0) 3.69 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.41 (2H, q, J = 7.0), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 1.14 (3H, t, J = 7.1); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 174.84, 166.09, 143.51, 142.25, 142.12, 138.62, 135.78, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 114.63, 112.93, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 31.21, 39.16, 33.62, 30.36, 28.45, 26.52, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.78, 10.01; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C39H50N5O2 (M+H)+ 620.3936, found 620.3981.
4.1.2.13. 8-n-Butamidomanzamine A (17)
Compound 17 (16 mg, 14%); 13.2 (c 0.12, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.25 (1H, s), 8.70 (1H, s), 8.51 (1H, d, J = 8.2), 8.36 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 7.5), 7.78 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.62 (1H, s), 6.25 (1H, m), 5.54 (1H, m), 5.39 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.92 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.00 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.66 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.37 (2H, t, J = 7.2), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 1.00 (3H, t, J = 7.2); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173.41, 143.82, 142.97, 141.90, 138.48, 135.17, 133.45, 133.29, 132.45, 130.42, 130.01, 127.30, 125.15, 123.99, 122.87, 120.67, 116.50, 114.32, 78.41, 71.70, 70.74, 63.42, 57.67, 53.88, 49.65, 47.45, 45.03, 41.44, 39.48, 34.05, 32.26, 30.36, 27.41, 26.36, 24.99, 24.58, 24.32, 20.73, 19.76, 14.42; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C40H52N5O2 (M+H)+ 634.4011, found 634.4101.
4.1.2.14. 8-Isobutamidomanzamine A (18)
Compound 18 (16 mg, 14%); 14.2 (c 0.10, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.41 (1H, s), 8.50 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.32 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 7.78 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.77 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.29 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.67 (1H, s), 6.30 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.2), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.63 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 1.29 (6H, d, J = 7.2); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 172.35, 143.57, 142.57, 142.14, 138.19, 135.87, 133.91, 133.78, 133.04, 129.86, 128.13, 126.75, 123.60, 120.36, 116.20, 114.02, 77.97, 71.70, 70.33, 57.35, 53.50, 49.25, 47.07, 44.63, 40.9, 39.16, 35.64, 33.75, 29.68, 28.36, 25.00, 24.34, 20.74, 20.06, 19.86; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C40H52N5O2 (M+H)+ 634.4011, found 634.4095.
4.1.2.15. 8-n-Pentamidomanzamine A (19)
Compound 19 (17 mg,15%); 17.2 (c 0.16, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.29 (1H, s), 8.51 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.34 (1H, d, J = 8.2), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.77 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.24 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.54 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.1), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.39 (2H, t, J = 7.1), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 0.99 (3H, t, J = 7.2); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 172.97, 143.57, 142.60, 141.99, 138.18, 135.78, 134.88, 133.85, 133.42, 130.02, 127.22, 125.35, 123.63, 119.65, 116.18, 114.01, 78.07, 71.70, 70.40, 57.33, 53.53, 49.30, 47.07, 44.72, 41.08, 39.08, 37.07, 33.72, 31.91, 30.36, 29.68, 26.51, 26.36, 25.01, 24.59, 24.34, 22.67, 22.48, 20.75, 13.97; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C41H54N5O2 (M+H)+ 648.4277, found 648.4281.
4.1.2.16. 8-Pivalamidomanzamine A (20)
Compound 20 (15 mg, 12%); 17.2 (c 0.11, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.40 (1H, s), 8.40 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 8.38 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 7.84 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.82 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.24 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.78 (1H, s), 6.26 (1H, m), 5.58 (1H, m), 5.36 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.85 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.67 (1H, s), 3.21 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.49 (9H, s), 1.48 (m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 175.04, 166.03, 143.57, 142.05, 141.99, 138.27, 135.04, 134.48, 133.85, 133.86, 131.87, 127.11, 125.35, 123.99, 121.91, 116.86, 113.96, 77.23, 71.70, 70.52, 58.36, 57.11, 53.56, 49.37, 47.07, 44.59, 39.29, 38.74, 33.77, 32.76, 29.69, 28.45, 26.71, 26.36, 25.61, 24.58, 24.44, 22.68, 20.80, 14.03; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C41H54N5O2 (M+H)+ 648.4277, found 648.4268.
4.1.2.17. 8-n-Hexamidomanzamine A (21)
Compound 21 (16 mg, 14%); 21.1 (c 0.11, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.22 (1H, s), 8.72 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.45 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 7.99 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.91 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.78 (1H, s), 6.12 (1H, m), 5.53 (1H, m), 5.16 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.88 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0) 3.79 (1H, s), 3.41 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 2.94 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.56 (2H, t, J = 7.4), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 0.94 (3H, t, J = 7.1); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173.50, 164.75, 142.69, 142.28, 142.10, 139.23, 133.93, 132.38, 130.65, 126.01, 124.70, 123.46, 119.50, 117.24, 114.89, 77.47, 71.57, 70.07, 58.06, 53.77, 53.38, 49.61, 47.18, 44.99, 40.87, 40.26, 37.56, 34.60, 30.11, 29.73, 29.53, 28.73, 27.12, 26.78, 26.40, 25.54, 24.90, 23.05, 21.34, 14.22; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C42H56N5O2 (M+H)+ 662.4488, found 662.4521.
4.1.2.18. 8-n-Octamidomanzamine A (22)
Compound 22 (18 mg, 15%); 19.9 (c 0.11, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.61 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 8.52 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 7.87 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.84 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.23 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.69 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12.1), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.46 (2H, t, J = 7.1), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m), 0.90 (3H, t, J = 7.1); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173.54, 164.54, 142.87, 142.25, 142.04, 138.60, 136.12, 134.48, 133.85, 133.42, 130.20, 128.08, 125.35, 122.38, 122.12, 116.26, 114.33, 77.85, 71.70, 70.50, 57.09, 53.49, 49.32, 47.07, 44.82, 38.60, 37.47, 31.61, 29.68, 28.17, 26.78, 26.40, 25.54, 25.28, 24.94, 22.45, 21.34, 14.51; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C44H60N5O2 (M+H)+ 690.4732, found 690.4772.
4.1.2.19. 8-(t-Butyl)-acetamidomanzamine A (23)
Compound 23 (16 mg, 14%); 25.7 (c 0.12, MeOH 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.32 (1H, s), 8.63 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.51 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 7.88 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.86 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.71 (1H, s), 6.28 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, m), 5.42 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.96 (1H, t, J = 8.1), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 16.0, 8.1), 3.7 (1H, s), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 12).1, 3.04 (d, J = 8), 2.95 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.24 (2H, s), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.02 (9H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 174.15, 164.43, 143.59, 142.41, 142.01, 138.27, 135.04, 134.48, 133.85, 132.86, 131.87, 127.11, 123.99, 122.38, 121.91, 116.86, 113.96, 77.23, 70.52, 58.35, 57.11, 53.56, 52.92, 49.37, 45.52, 44.59, 39.29, 33.77, 32.76, 29.69, 27.86, 26.71, 26.48, 25.10, 24.72, 24.44, 22.68, 20.80; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C42H56N5O2 (M+H)+ 662.4425, found 662.4478.
4.1.2.20. 8-Cyclohexamidomanzamine A (24)
Compound 24 (19 mg, 16%); 19.5 (c 0.17, MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.30 (s), 9.52 (s), 8.49 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 8.33 (1H, d, J = 8.1), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.9), 7.76 (1H, d, J = 7.8), 7.20 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 6.55 (s), 6.28 (m), 5.55 (m), 5.39 (1H, t, J = 4.0), 4.90 (1H, t, J = 8.0), 4.02 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 8.0), 3.72 (s), 3.26 (1H, t, J = 12.0), 2.91 (1H, d, J = 8.0), 2.78 (m), 2.77 (m), 2.61 (m), 2.43 (m), 2.31 (m), 2.26 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.96 (m), 1.74 (m), 1.48 (m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 174.12, 164.03, 143.57, 142.52, 141.99, 138.13, 134.92, 134.48, 133.85, 133.00, 130.86, 128.78, 126.79, 123.64, 120.29, 119.60, 116.05, 113.97, 77.96, 77.23, 71.70, 70.48, 58.32, 57.34, 53.54, 53.39, 49.31, 45.70, 44.78, 40.98, 39.11, 33.73, 31.90, 29.81, 29.75, 29.67, 29.33, 28.48, 26.48, 26.41, 25.68, 25.64, 25.00, 24.59, 24.28, 22.66, 20.75; HRESIMS m/z calcd for C43H56N5O2 (M+H)+ 674.4434, found 674.4432.
4.2. In vitro antimalarial and antimicrobial activities
The detailed materials and methods used for in vitro antimalarial and in vitro antimicrobial assays were reported elsewhere.19
4.3. In vivo antimalarial activity
The in vivo antimalarial activity of the compounds was determined in mice infected with P. berghei (NK-65 strain). Male mice (Swiss Webster strain) weighing 18–20 g were intraperitoneally inoculated with 2 × 107 parasitized red blood cells obtained from a highly infected donor mouse. Mice were divided into different groups with 5 mice in each group. Test compounds were prepared in DMSO/0.1 N HCl/Tween-80/PEG-400/water (5:1:0.5:40:53.50) and administered orally to the mice about 2 h after the infection (day 0). The compounds were tested at three doses of 3.3, 10 and 30 mg/kg body weight. The test compounds were administered to the mice once a day for three consecutive days (days 0–3). A control group was treated with equal volume of vehicle and another control group was treated with chloroquine (10 mg/kg). The mice were closely observed after every dose for any apparent signs of toxicity. Blood smears were prepared on different days (till day 28 post infection) by clipping the tail end, stained with Giemsa and observed under microscope for determination of the parasitemia. Suppression in development of parasitemia was monitored on day 5 and day 7 post infection. Mice without parasitemia until day 28 post infection were considered as cured. Treatment of mice with three doses of chloroquine caused 100% suppression of the parasitemia.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NIH (NCRR P20 RR021929, C06 RR1450301, NIAID AI 27094, R-01 AI 36596-12). We would like to thank Shabana Khan and John Trott for in vitro antimalarial evaluation. Also, Melissa R. Jacob and Marsha Wright for in vitro antimicrobial evaluation, and Rajnish Sahu for in vivo antimalarial evaluation. The biological screening was partially supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Specific Cooperative Agreement No. 58-6408-2-0009, and NIH, NIAID, Division of AIDS, Grant No. AI 27094. A.E.W. would like to thank The Ministry of Higher Education of Egypt for a predoctoral fellowship and Triton BioPharma AG for a Triton fellowship.
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.09.026.
References and notes
- 1.Panosian CB. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:713. doi: 10.1086/427807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ridley RG. Nature. 2002;415:686. doi: 10.1038/415686a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J Nat Prod. 2008;70:461. doi: 10.1021/np068054v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rao KV, Santarsiero BD, Mesecar AD, Schinazi RF, Tekwani BL, Hamann MT. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:823. doi: 10.1021/np020592u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hamann MT, El-Sayed KA. US27035 2002017917. Application: WOWO Patent, 2001.
- 6.Nakamura H, Deng S, Kobayashi J, Ohizumi Y, Tomotake Y, Matsuzaki T, Hirata Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:621. [Google Scholar]
- 7.El Sayed KA, Kelly M, Kara UAK, Ang KKH, Katsuyama I, Dunbar DC, Khan AA, Hamann MT. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:1804. doi: 10.1021/ja002073o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ang KKH, Holmes MJ, Higa T, Hamann MT, Kara UAK. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1645. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.6.1645-1649.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sakai R, Higa T, Jefford CW, Bernardinelli G. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:6404. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Longley RE, McConnell OJ, Essich E, Harmody D. J Nat Prod. 1993;56:915. doi: 10.1021/np50096a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Mayer AMS, Gunasekera SP, Pomponi SA, Sennett SH. US Patent. 2003;6:881. [Google Scholar]; (b) Mayer AMS, Gunasekera SP, Pomponi SA, Sennett SH. US Patent. 2002;6:916. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Peng J, Shen X, El Sayed KA, Dunbar DC, Perry TL, Wilkins SP, Hamann MT, Bobzin S, Huesing J, Camp R, Prinsen M, Krupa D, Wideman MA. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:2246. doi: 10.1021/jf0207880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peng J, Rao KV, Choo YM, Hamann MT. Manzamine Alkaloids. In: Fattorusso E, Taglialatela-Scafati O, editors. Modern Alkaloids. Wiley; Weinheim, Germany: 2007. pp. 189–232. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hamann MT. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:653. doi: 10.2174/138161207780162818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rao KV, Kasanah N, Wahyuono S, Tekwani BL, Schinazi RF, Hamann MT. J Nat Prod. 2004;67:1314. doi: 10.1021/np0400095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Peng J, Hu JF, Kazi AB, Li Z, Avery M, Peraud O, Hill RT, Franzblau SG, Zhang F, Schinazi RF, Wirtz SS, Tharnish P, Kelly M, Wahyuono S, Hamann MT. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13382. doi: 10.1021/ja030087z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peng J, Kudrimoti S, Prasanna S, Odde S, Doerksen RJ, Pennaka HK, Choo Y, Rao KV, Tekwani BL, Madugula V, Khan SI, Wang B, Mayer AMS, Jacob MR, Tu LC, Gertsch J, Hamann MT. J Med Chem. doi: 10.1021/jm900672t. submitted for publication. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yousaf M, Hammond NL, Peng J, Wahyuono S, McIntosh KA, Charman WN, Mayer AMS, Hamann MT. J Med Chem. 2004;47:3512. doi: 10.1021/jm030475b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rao KV, Donia MS, Peng J, Garcia-Palomero E, Alonso D, Martinez A, Medina M, Franzblau SG, Tekwani BL, Khan SI, Wahyuono S, Willett KL, Hamann MT. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:1034. doi: 10.1021/np0601399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



