Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2016 Jan 29;11(2):e1132966. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1132966

Cytosolic ppGpp accumulation induces retarded plant growth and development

Yuta Ihara a, Shinji Masuda b,c
PMCID: PMC4883912  PMID: 26825398

ABSTRACT

In bacteria a second messenger, guanosine 5′-diphosphate 3′-diphosphate (ppGpp), synthesized upon nutrient starvation, controls many gene expressions and enzyme activities, which is necessary for growth under changeable environments. Recent studies have shown that ppGpp synthase and hydrolase are also conserved in eukaryotes, although their functions are not well understood. We recently showed that ppGpp-overaccumulation in Arabidopsis chloroplasts results in robust growth under nutrient-limited conditions, demonstrating that the bacterial-like stringent response at least functions in plastids. To test if ppGpp also functions in the cytosol, we constructed the transgenic Arabidopsis expressing Bacillus subtilis ppGpp synthase gene yjbM. Upon induction of the gene, the mutant synthesizes ∼10–20-fold higher levels of ppGpp, and its fresh weight was reduced to ˜80% that of the wild type. These results indicate that cytosolic ppGpp negatively regulates plant growth and development.

Keywords: mesh1, nutrient starvation, ppGpp, RSH, stringent response


Stringent response is one of the most important regulatory systems for bacteria to survive under fluctuating conditions. The response is mediated by the unusual nucleotide, guanosine 5′-diphosphate 3′-diphosphate (ppGpp), the level of which is maintained by two enzymes, RelA and SpoT, in Escherichia coli.1 These enzymes catalyze ppGpp synthesis by phosphorylating GTP (or GDP) using ATP in response to various environmental signals such as amino-acid starvation; and ion, phosphorus, and carbon limitation. ppGpp controls the transcription and translation of many genes, and regulates several enzyme activities to fit metabolic processes for growth under starved conditions.1

Recent progress in genome sequencing has revealed that RelA/SpoT homologs (RSHs) are conserved in plants and green algae.2-4 Moreover, metazoan SpoT homolog-1 (Mesh1) was identified in human and Drosophila melanogaster.5 Plant RSHs and Drosophila Mesh1 show ppGpp synthase and hydrolase activities, respectively,5-8 suggesting that ppGpp functions in eukaryotic cells. We recently showed that Arabidopsis RSHs, localized in chloroplasts, are important for plant growth and stress responses; ppGpp overaccumulation in chloroplasts results in robust growth under nutrient-deficient conditions.9 This indicates that the stringent response is at least operating in the organelle, which has important roles in the systematic growth of host organisms.

The next question is whether ppGpp could function in the cytosol. In plants, nucleotides synthesized in plastids are transported to the cytosol by several transporters,10,11 suggesting that some ppGpp, synthesized in plastids, could localize in cytosolic fractions. Given that ppGpp competitively binds most GTP-binding sites,12 cytosolic ppGpp, if it exists, should have an impact on many metabolic controls. To check this possibility, we aimed to observe the effects of ppGpp-overaccumulation in the cytosol in plants. Specifically, we constructed a transgenic Arabidopsis expressing Bacillus subtilis ppGpp synthase gene (yjbM) under the control of the estrogen-induced promoter; the resulting line was designated as YJBMox. Because YjbM is a small protein (˜25 kDa) consisting of a single ppGpp synthase domain,13 YjbM expression could induce constitutive ppGpp synthesis in the cytosol.

The YJBMox and the control plant, containing the empty vector, were grown under normal 1/2MS medium9 for 10 days, and then transferred to 1/2MS medium containing 2 μM β-estradiol to induce YjbM overexpression. As shown in Fig. 1A, ppGpp levels in YJBMox, but not the control line, were highly increased (∼10–20-fold), with an observed maximum value after 3 days. Given YjbM has no transit peptide, it should localize and produce ppGpp in the cytosol. The observed phenotype of YJBMox was striking; it showed retarded growth on the estrogen-containing plates (Fig. 1B). The fresh weight of the YJBMox line was reduced to ∼80% that of the wild type. These results indicated that cytosolic ppGpp negatively regulates plant growth.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

ppGpp overaccumulation results in retarded growth of Arabidopsis. The yjbM gene13 was synthesized in vitro with adapting its codon usage for expression in Arabidopsis. The DNA fragment was cloned into the estrogen-inducible expression vector pER8 at its SpeI and XhoI sites.15 The resulting plasmid was introduced into Arabidopsis wild type (ecotype Columbia) by the Agrobacterium transformation method,16 and the obtained mutant was designated as YJBMox. As a control, the empty vector (pER8) was also introduced. (A) Plants grown in MS medium for 10 days were transferred to the MS medium containing 2 μM β-estradiol, and ppGpp levels in each line were quantified after 0, 1, 3, and 10-days. (B) Phenotypes of plants 0 and 10 days after the transfer.

We recently showed that ppGpp overaccumulation in chloroplasts results in better and more robust growth under normal and nutrient-limited conditions, respectively.9 The ppGpp effects on plant growth are the opposite of those observed in the cytosolic ppGpp overaccumulation mutant as reported here, suggesting that cytosolic and plastidial ppGpp levels could regulate plant growth in a different way. Perhaps, in the wild type plant, ppGpp levels are coordinately regulated in each location for optimizing different metabolic processes and gene expressions to adapt the growth rate in response to varying environmental conditions.

It was previously shown that Drosophila Mesh1 mutant exhibited retarded body growth during early developmental stages.5 Given that Mesh1 possesses only a ppGpp-hydrolase domain, ppGpp levels in the mutant cells are expected to be higher than that in the wild type. This suggests that retarded growth of the Mesh1 mutant may result from cytosolic ppGpp overaccumulation, although ppGpp synthase is unknown and there is still no evidence for the existence of ppGpp in animal cells. Clearly, further characterization of plant RSHs and Drosophila Mesh1, coupled with a quantitative analysis of ppGpp,14 should be important for elucidating the exact function and evolutionary traits of the ppGpp-dependent stringent response for metabolic control in eukaryotic cells.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

We thank all Photobiology Lab members for discussion, and L. Kwok (Tokyo Institute of Technology) for critical reading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from MEXT of Japan (No. 25120709) to S.M.

References

  • 1.Cashel M, Gentry DR, Hernandez VJ, Vinella D. The stringent response In: Escherichia coli and Salmonella; Cell Mol Biol, 2nd edn. 1458-1496, 1996; Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (Eds.), ASM Press, Washington, USA [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Masuda S. The stringent response in phototrophs In: Advances in Photosynthesis - Fundamental Aspects. 487-500, 2012; Najafpour M. (Ed.), In Tech [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tozawa Y, Nomura Y. Signalling by the global regulatory molecule ppGpp in bacteria and chloroplasts of land plants. Plant Biol 2011; 13:699-709; PMID:21815973; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00484.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van der Biezen EA, Sun J, Coleman MJ, Bibb MJ, Jones JD. Arabidopsis RelA/SpoT homologs implicate (p)ppGpp in plant signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000; 97:3747-3752; PMID:10725385; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun D, Lee G, Lee JH, Kim HY, Rhee HW, Park SY, Kim KJ, Kim Y, Kim BY, Hong JI, et al.. A metazoan ortholog of SpoT hydrolyzes ppGpp and functions in starvation responses. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:1188-1194; PMID:20818390; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nsmb.1906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Givens RM, Lin MH, Taylor DJ, Mechold U, Berry JO, Hernandez VJ. Inducible expression, enzymatic activity and origin of higher plant homologues of bacterial RelA/SpoT stress proteins in Nicotiana tabacum. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:7495-504; PMID:14660585; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M311573200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Masuda S, Mizusawa K, Narisawa T, Tozawa Y, Ohta H, Takamiya K. The bacterial stringent response, conserved in chloroplasts, controls plant fertilization. Plant Cell Physiol 2008; 49:135-141; PMID:18178586; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcm177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tozawa Y, Nozawa A, Kanno T, Narisawa T, Masuda S, Kasai K, Nanamiya H. Calcium-activated (p)ppGpp synthetase in chloroplasts of land plants. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:35536-35545; PMID:17938177; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M703820200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maekawa M, Honoki R, Ihara Y, Sato R, Oikawa A, Kanno Y, Ohta H, Seo M, Saito K, Masuda S. Impact of the plastidial stringent response in plant growth and stresss responses. Nat Plants 2015; 1:15167, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nplants.2015.167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Neuhaus HE, Wagner R. Solute pores, ion channels and metabolite transporters in the outer and inner envelope membranes of higher plant plastids. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1465:307-323; PMID:10748262; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00146-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spetea C, Schoefs B. Solute transporters in plant thylakoid membranes. Commun Integr Biol 2010; 3:122-129; PMID:20585503; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/cib.3.2.10909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kanjee U, Ogata K, Houry WA. Direct binding targets of the stringent response alarmone (p)ppGpp. Mol Microbiol 2012; 85:1029-1043; PMID:22812515; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08177.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nanamiya H, Kasai K, Nozawa A, Yun CS, Narisawa T, Murakami K, Natori Y, Kawamura F, Tozawa Y. Identification and functional analysis of novel (p)ppGpp synthetase genes in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 2008; 67:291-304; PMID:18067544; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06018.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ihara Y, Ohta H, Masuda S. A highly sensitive quantification method for the accumulation of alarmone ppGpp in Arabidopsis thaliana using UPLC-ESI-qMS/MS. J Plant Res 2015; 128:511-518; PMID:25752614; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10265-015-0711-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zuo J, Niu QW, Chua NH. An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant J 2000; 24:265-273; PMID:11069700; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00868.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bechtold N, Pelletier G. In planta Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants by vacuum infiltration. Methods Mol Biol 1998; 82:259-266; PMID:9664431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES