Skip to main content
Stem Cells International logoLink to Stem Cells International
. 2016 May 15;2016:8304879. doi: 10.1155/2016/8304879

Stem Cell Therapy for Treatment of Ocular Disorders

Padma Priya Sivan 1,2, Sakinah Syed 1, Pooi-Ling Mok 3,4,*, Akon Higuchi 5,6,7,*, Kadarkarai Murugan 8,9, Abdullah A Alarfaj 6, Murugan A Munusamy 6, Rukman Awang Hamat 1, Akihiro Umezawa 7, Suresh Kumar 1,*
PMCID: PMC4884591  PMID: 27293447

Abstract

Sustenance of visual function is the ultimate focus of ophthalmologists. Failure of complete recovery of visual function and complications that follow conventional treatments have shifted search to a new form of therapy using stem cells. Stem cell progenitors play a major role in replenishing degenerated cells despite being present in low quantity and quiescence in our body. Unlike other tissues and cells, regeneration of new optic cells responsible for visual function is rarely observed. Understanding the transcription factors and genes responsible for optic cells development will assist scientists in formulating a strategy to activate and direct stem cells renewal and differentiation. We review the processes of human eye development and address the strategies that have been exploited in an effort to regain visual function in the preclinical and clinical state. The update of clinical findings of patients receiving stem cell treatment is also presented.

1. Introduction

Blindness or loss of visual function can be caused by failure of the light path to reach the retina or failure of the retina to capture and convert light to an electrochemical signal before transmission to the brain via optic nerve [1]. The major causes contributing to blindness include age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, and glaucoma [24], which are genetically linked [5] and associated with multiple risk factors including diet [6], hypertension [7], pregnancy [8], and smoking [9]. The occurrences of these pathologies increase with the age of the patient and are thus widely spread among aging populations. Blindness is an extensive disease that not only affects the quality of life of the patients themselves but may have a negative impact on the socioeconomic status of their immediate families [10, 11].

Current treatments have aimed at protecting vision and preventing visual impairment by early diagnosis using various methods of intervention such as surgery, ionizing radiation, laser, or drug treatments [1214]. Despite the efficiencies of these treatment modalities, they do not provide a complete solution to stop the progression to blindness.

Many recent findings from preclinical data have supported the notion that stem cells have the capacity to revive degenerated cells or replace cells in many major diseases including ocular disorders [1518]. Stem cells are present in all tissues in our body and are self-renewable and capable of maintaining a certain level of differentiation in response to injury for tissue repair [1921]. We mainly aimed this review at both clinicians and academicians, so we presented the localization of stem cell progenitors with eye development in different regions in the eye, the functions of these progenitors, and the current clinical trials and their exploitation of nontissue specific stem cells as alternative sources for regaining lost vision.

2. Gene and Protein Regulation during Eye Development

Eye development involves indispensable participation of the neural ectoderm (NE), surface ectoderm (SE), ectomesenchymal/cranial neural crest cell (CNCC), and modicum of mesenchymal tissues [22]. During the fourth week of intrauterine life, the forebrain gives rise to two bulges called optic vesicles that extend like a stalk and a cup to trigger the surface ectoderm on both sides [22]. The retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and neural retina (NR) are developed from outer and inner layer of optic cup, while the optic nerve is developed from optic stalk [22]. The cup tip becomes the ciliary body and iris by integrating with the CNCC [23]. The surface ectoderm is repressible for the lens, cornea, and conjunctiva [24]. The sclera, corneal endothelium, corneal stroma, iridial stroma, and iridial muscles are contributed by the CNCC [25]. The neural ectodermal derivatives of eye are permanent cells and lack the self-renewal, as like other nervous tissues. But unlike other surface ectodermal derivatives, the ocular ectodermal derivatives do lack the self-renewal in the eye during aging which collectively results in various degenerative disorders.

The well-organized time-dependent interactions and gene expression of all these layers for initiation, pattern determination, and organogenesis are significant for eye development [22, 2427]. Eye development in an embryonic mouse at 9.5 days is shown in Figure 1 [26]. The neural ectoderm bulges as the optic vesicle to reach the surface ectoderm. The surface ectoderm becomes thicker on contact with the neural ectoderm to become the lens placode. Except in the lens placode region, the neural ectoderm and the surface ectoderm are separated by the extraocular mesenchyme. In the NE, the presumptive RPE, NR, and optic tract are colored red, green, and yellow, respectively, in Figure 1. The lens placode is colored blue in Figure 1. The transcription factors described in Figure 1 are involved in the regulation of eye development.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crucial biomolecules expression in an embryonic mouse at 9.5 days. The neural ectoderm (NE) bulges as optic vesicle (OV) to reach the surface ectoderm (SE) on both sides. The SE became thicker upon the contact of NE to become the lens placode. Except in the lens placode region, the NE and SE are separated by the EOM. In the NE, the presumptive RPE, neural retina, and optic tract are colored red, green, and yellow, respectively. The lens placode is colored blue. The TF reciprocally act to regulate eye development. EOM, extraocular mesenchyme; RPE, retinal pigmented epithelium; NR, neural retina; TF, transcription factor. Copyright 2012. Modified with permission from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press [26].

Pax6 is a crucial and evolutionarily conserved homeobox gene of eye development [28, 29]. Along with Pax6, the other associated genes reported for eye development are Rx/Rax, Pax2, Lhx2, Mitf, Otx2, Sox2, Six3, Pitx, Vsx2, Crx, Optx2, and FaxL2 [2839]. The expression of Pax6 is upregulated by Six3 and downregulated by Shh (Sonic hedgehog) [35] to help eye formation on both sides [39]. The transcription factor Pax2 is important for the formation of the optic stalk (which becomes the optic nerve). Retinal axons from both the eyes selectively decussate at the midline named optic chiasma (crucial for vision) which is failed when the Pax2 mutates (optic chiasma) [23].

Initiation of optic vesicle formation from the neural ectoderm by Rx/Rax involves extensive cell movements and proliferation [36]. In addition, Rx is essential for expression of Lhx2, Pax6, Mab2112, and Six3, which specifies the retinal progenitor cells in the optic cup [30, 31, 36, 37]. Lhx2, a patterning gene expressed in the neural ectoderm, is important for expression of Mitf [32]. Mitf is a governing gene for RPE that specifies the neural retina, and in the neural ectoderm, RPE regulates the vesicle to cup transformation and activates the retinoid acid receptor, which is another important factor for eye development [33, 34]. In Lhx2 mutant mouse, Mitf and Vsx2 are never initiated and Pax2, Vax2, and Rx are initiated but not maintained, resulting in arrest of eye development in the optic vesicle stage [40]. The optic vesicle is important for lens formation and the lens is important for the vesicle to cup formation. The surface ectoderm will not form the lens if the optic vesicle is removed. In contrast, when provided with an optic vesicle, any primitive ectoderm will develop into the lens [40].

The neural retina, the brain of eye with nine distinct layers, transmits color signals in and out as vision [22]. During development, the neural retina depends on the expression of Vsx2, an important homeobox gene for early patterning and maintenance of cell proliferation and fate [41]. MAPK/FGF signaling is important for neural retina and upregulates Vsx2 [42] and Vsx2 downregulates Mitf [4244]. This regulation helps control the distinct neural retina and RPE specification in the optic cup. FGF9, normally expressed in the distal optic vesicle, is important for the boundary between the neural retina and the RPE [4446]. FGF receptor activation is crucial in chicks but not in mice [46]. This suggests that there is species-specific neurogenesis. Interestingly, specific activation of MAPK/FGF can induce neural retina formation from presumptive RPE with distinct layers [43, 45, 4749]. BMP is important for Vsx2 regulation [50]. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the adult eye of different vertebrates (frogs and fish, birds, and human) [27]. The ciliary marginal zone (CMZ, yellow color in Figure 2) is progressively reduced in higher vertebrates. Unlike the earlier vertebrates, the neural retina in mammals (blue color in Figure 2) is not renewed continuously because of the absence of the CMZ [51]. The neural progenitor marker Nestin is expressed in the junction of the ciliary body with the neural retina, suggesting the remaining of a CMZ even though the relationship is not clear [52]. The regeneration studies reported with RPE to neural retina are akin to transdifferentiation under suitable conditions [53].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CMZ in vertebrates. The CMZ is progressively reduced in higher vertebrates. The adult eye of different vertebrates (frogs and fish (a), avians (b), and mammals (c)) is shown in blue and represents the neural retina of embryonic origin, which lacks the continuous renewal ability of the CMZ, which is shown in yellow. CMZ: ciliary marginal zone. Copyright 2004. Modified with permission from UBC Press [27].

Müller glial cells are a progenitor glial component of the neural retina, which arise from activation of Notch, Rax, and Jak signaling pathway [54]. The RPE is an array of uniformly arranged cells in a single layer between the retina and choroid [22]. MITF governs the RPE, the bHLH transcription factor that is the first and critical gene expressed in presumptive RPE and is specific for patterning and cell proliferation [38]. Mitf, the regulator of the pigmented cells (both in the RPE and in the CNCC) is expressed even before the pigments are formed in the RPE [24]. Mitf is initially expressed throughout the optic vesicle but is later downregulated in neural retina for layer specification. Otx2 is important for Mitf expression [33]. Pax regulates both the Mitf and Otx2 [55]. Pax2 and Pax6 bind and activate the Mitf A enhancer [35]. Retinoid acid signaling regulates the optic cup morphogenesis and induces apoptosis in extraocular mesenchyme [33]. Retinoid acid receptors (RAR-α,β,γ) are important for signal transduction of retinoic acid, which is important for the maintenance of the RPE [56]. The enzymes, retinaldehyde dehydrogenases (Raldh) 1, 2, and 3, are vital for retinoid acid synthesis. Raldh 3 originates from the RPE, and Raldh 2 originates from the surrounding mesenchyme [57]. Pitx2 is also important for RPE differentiation [58]. The fate of RPE is influenced by Shh [59]. Growth arrest specific 1 (Gas1) is a (GPI) protein that binds and coregulates with Shh [60]. Gas1 downregulates the proliferation of the RPE to maintain a single cell-layered structure [60]. There are reports of the distinct control mechanisms by BMP in the ventral and dorsal aspects of the RPE [61]. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway also controls the optic cup differentiation by activating Mitf and Otx2 [62].

The ciliary body and the iris are developed from the optic cup tip with the incorporated connective tissue stroma derived from the migrated CNCC. The smooth muscles of the iris, namely, the sphincter and dilator pupillae, are derived by transdifferentiation of the pigmented epithelial cells of neural origin [43, 63]. The iris and ciliary body regulate the light reaching the retina and maintain the intraocular pressure by maintaining the aqueous humor secretion [61, 64]. The pigmented cells of the iris possess the ability to differentiate into RPE, neural retina, and lens, and a potential source of stem cells in mammals [65]. FGF, BMP, and Wnt/β-catenin participate in the differentiation of progenitor cells into ciliary and iris epithelium [45, 66].

The lens is derived from the surface ectoderm upon receiving instruction by Pax6 to respond to FGF, BMP, and Sox2. Fox-3 helps in the separation of the lens from the surface ectoderm and formation of lens fibers. Lens fibers are epithelial cells that undergo clever modification to become transparent fibers by losing their organelles and accumulating crystalline protein; Pax6, Pitx3, c-Maf, HSF4, RAR, Six, Sox, and Prox are the transcription factors related to crystalline genes [66, 67]. The CNCC is crucial for eye development and restricts the lens formation area in the surface ectoderm by inhibiting cells other than those for the lens. The lens is under the control of the retina throughout life. The retinal secretion of FGF accumulates in the vitreous humor and stimulates the lens part facing the retina to form lens fibers. If the developing lens is rotated, the cell type changes to form lens fibers from the surface facing the retina (Figure 3) [23]. Attempt can be made to turn the defective lens, front to back to find the results, because the side of the lens which faces the retina is influenced with better survival.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Flow chart: major events of eye development and the involvement of biomolecules. Copyright 2009. Modified with permission from Mosby/Elsevier Ltd. [23].

The optic cup is surrounded by mesenchymal cells predominantly of CNCC origin that help in the formation of the vascular coat called the choroid and fibrous coat, namely, the sclera. Transcription factors involved with the scleral development are Foxc1, Foxc2, Lmx1b, Pax6, Pitx2, RARb, RARg, RXRa, Six3, and Smad2 [30, 31, 36, 39].

The corneal epithelium is continuous with the conjunctiva covering the visible part of the sclera. The junction between the corneal and conjunctiva is named the limbus, which holds stem cells for the renewal of the epithelium throughout life [22]. The corneal epithelium is constantly renewed every 7 to 10 days. Corneal epithelium expresses ΔNp63α, ABCG2, integrin α9, Bmi-1, EGFR, TGF, and PDGF growth factor indicators for their stemness. The stromal interaction is important for the cell renewal achieved by paracrine factors, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF). These factors are fibroblast-derived epithelial mitogens of the FGF7 family. In the corneal endothelium the morphology, collagen expression, and cell proliferation are maintained by TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 [46, 49]. Altogether, the corneal endothelial integrity is preserved by Pax6, Lmx1b, and Pitx2 [37].

The tissues of eye which are commonly associated with diseases are the surface ectoderm derivatives cornea and lens and the neural ectoderm derivatives RPE and retina. Since the lens and cornea do lack the renewal capacity during aging, stem cells from other surface ectoderm derivatives which are relatively easy to collect can be reprogrammed by manipulating target genes and proteins with the help of gained knowledge from molecular biology for regenerative therapy. Regenerated lenses from stem cells can be more exciting personalized regenerative treatment.

The aim of understanding the sequential events during embryogenesis at molecular level cell to cell communication is to understand the pathogenesis and to design the regenerative or genetic therapy to restore normal. The commonest degenerative eye disorders can be tactfully managed by delivering target proteins to prevent and to repair several types of ocular diseases. Stem cells of eye are closely associated with maxillofacial tissues including dental stem cells (a derivative of CNCC) during embryogenesis which retain the stem cells till life can be traced and reprogrammed for stem cell therapy. Researchers differentiated retina [68] from dental pulp stem cells. Epigenetic memory explains that the differentiated cells retain the memory of their original tissue and on reprograming they spontaneously dedifferentiate to its original tissue [69, 70]. If the suggested RPE differentiation from dental stem cells [71] is succeeded, it will be more acceptable than the controversial embryonic stem cells, which has proven its success after 2 years of follow-up of clinical trial [72, 73]. Autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells have been successfully reconstructed to fabricate cornea to restore vision [74].

3. Manipulation of Stem Cells for Cell Replacement Therapy for Treatment of Ocular Disorders

To dispense a suitable intervention, the mechanism that regulates cell renewal, differentiation, and maturation change in a diseased microenvironment needs to be understood. One of the major inherited ocular disorders, Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), is characterized by progressive degeneration of photoreceptors in the retina [7578]. Complete blindness in most cases proves that humans lack a homeostatic mechanism to replace lost photoreceptors [79].

The earliest interventions used autologous tissue resident stem cells such as RPE cell suspensions or RPE-choroid sheets to improve vision of patients affected by age-related macular degeneration via subretinal translocation [80]. Other sources of stem or progenitors cells from extraocular tissues such as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [8183], dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) [68], hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) [84], mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [76, 8589], and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [9092] have been explored for regenerating retinal neurons, corneal or conjunctival epithelial cells, and the RPE. The reason for using these stem cells is their capability to form neural progenitor cells or mature optic cells and the release of trophic factors important for reparative mechanism (Table 1 [76, 82, 83, 8588, 90, 91, 9399]). The manipulation of these cells raises less debate over moral and ethical issues than the use of ESCs [93] and fetal stem cells [100, 101]. Moreover, the eye is a suitable target organ for stem cell transplantation because it is immune-privileged, and strict containment by the blood-retinal barrier will disable the emigration of possibly maltransformed injected cells to extraocular tissues [102].

Table 1.

Manipulation of different type of extraocular stem cells for treating ocular disorders in preclinical and clinical trials.

Stem cells Experimental design/research or disease model Route of injection Research outcomes References/sources
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) Chemically damaged retinal neuron in mice Intravenous injection Fusion with ganglion, amacrine, and Müller glial cells, heterokaryons reprogramming, and dedifferentiation into neuroectodermal lineage Sanges et al. [82]
Delivery of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in rats with retina ischemia Intravenous injection Apoptosis of retinal cells was reduced and improved visual function Localization of HSCs in the retinal layer Lin et al. [94]
Transplantation of human HSCs in mice with acute retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury Intravenous injection HSC-treated group of mice showed improved retinal histopathology. However there was no significant difference compared to control mice. No intraocular tumor and no abnormal proliferation of human cells in major organs Park et al. [83]
Transplantation in retinal degenerative conditions (atrophic ARMD, Retinitis Pigmentosa) or retinal vascular disease (diabetes, vein occlusion) Intravitreal injection Clinical trial to measure primary outcome on adverse events is still ongoing NCT01736059 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) Injection of mouse fibroblast iPSC-conditioned medium Intravenous injection Maintenance of retina integrity and function by reducing apoptosis of retinal neurons following photodamage Chang et al. [91]
Swine iPSCs-derived photoreceptors Subretinal injection Integration of photoreceptors was observed in chemically damaged retina Zhou et al. [90]
Generation of 3-dimensional neural retina sheet derived from mouse iPSCs and ESCs for subretinal transplantation into retinal degenerative mice Subretinal injection Development into outer nuclear layer (ONL) with completely structured inner and outer segments of photoreceptor Assawachananont et al. [95]
Generation of photoreceptor cell from adult mouse dermal fibroblast-derived iPSCs for subretinal transplantation into retinal degenerative mice Subretinal injection Development of functional photoreceptor in mice Tucker et al. [96]
Generation of RPE sheets from human iPSCs for transplantation into wet ARMD patients Submacular injection Pilot safety study involving six patients is currently ongoing. RPE were observed to be retained in patients Kamao et al. [141]

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) In vitro differentiation of rostral neural progenitors into retinal neuron cells Not available Increased cell expression of CRX, S-opsin, and Rho/Rcvrn in hypoxic culture condition, indicating differentiation Garita-Hernández et al. [93]
Treatment of patients affected by Stargardt's macular dystrophy and atrophic ARMD with human ESCs-derived RPE suspension Submacular injection Improved visual function. No signs of hyperproliferation, tumorigenicity, ectopic tissue formation, and immune rejection were observed NCT01344993, NCT01345006
(ClinicalTrials.gov)
Treatment of patients affected by wet ARMD with human ESCs-derived RPE sheets Intraocular injection Clinical trial is still ongoing. This method of delivery is hoped to overcome the disadvantages of using ESC-derived RPE suspension NCT01691261
(ClinicalTrials.gov)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) Injection of bone marrow-derived MSCs into a laser-induced ocular hypertensive glaucoma of rat model Intravitreal injection Increase in retina ganglion cell (RGC) axon survival and significant decrease in the rate of RGC axon loss normalized to cumulative intraocular pressure exposure Johnson et al. [97]
Transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSCs into Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) rat model Not available Reduced apoptosis in retinal cells with higher expression of neurotrophin-3 and CNTF in ROP rats Zhao et al. [86]
Direct topical application of MSCs or MSCs-conditioned medium on cornea for two hours Corneal surface Reduced inflammation, opacity, and neovascularization in chemically burned cornea Oh et al. [85]
Transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSCs in rats following optic nerve crush Intravitreal injection Rescued degeneration of retinal ganglion cells and axon regeneration Mesentier-Louro et al. [88]
Transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSCs in alkali-induced oxidative stress rabbit corneas Corneal surface Reduced apoptosis in corneal epithelial cells, vascularization, and infiltration of macrophages Cejkova et al. [87]
In vitro differentiation of adult human bone marrow stem cells with retinal pigmented epithelium cells Coculture experiment Differentiated cells expressed neuronal and photoreceptor phenotypes Chiou et al. [98]
Transplantation of MSCs overexpressing pigment epithelium derived factor in animal models of choroid neovascularization Not available Inhibition of neovascularization and MSCs adopted RPE phenotypes Liu et al. [76]
Delivery of human adipose-derived MSCs to light-induced in vitro and in vivo models Intravitreal injection Inhibition of photoreceptor degeneration and retinal dysfunction Sugitani et al. [99]
Transplantation of human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs to neurodegenerative rat model Intraperitoneal injection Promotion of regeneration and protection of damaged retinal ganglion cells Zwart et al. [166]
In vivo delivery of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs to early retinal degenerative rat model Subretinal injection Preservation and rescue of photoreceptor degeneration and improvement in visual functions Lund et al. [167]
Delivery of ADSCs into atrophic ARMD patients. The cells are harvested from liposuction tissues Intravitreal injection Clinical trial to measure primary outcomes on adverse events; visual acuity and visual field analysis is still ongoing NCT02024269
(ClinicalTrials.gov)

Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) Injection of BMSCs in patients with advanced ARMD (atrophic or neovascular) Intravitreal injection Clinical trial to measure primary outcome on visual acuity is still ongoing NCT01518127
(ClinicalTrials.gov)

Bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) Unilateral ocular transplantation into patients with advanced atrophic AMD Subretinal injection Clinical trial to measure primary outcome on adverse events is still ongoing NCT01632527
(ClinicalTrials.gov)

Central nervous system stem cells (hCNS-SCs) Unilateral ocular transplantation into patients with advanced atrophic AMD Subretinal injection Clinical trial to measure primary outcome on adverse events is still ongoing NCT01632527
(ClinicalTrials.gov)

Figure 4 shows microcomputed tomography images to track the injected human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs (hWJ-MSCs) in a Retinitis Pigmentosa rat model [103]. The gold-loaded hWJ-MSC remained in the eye with no systemic migration to other organs detected on day 70 after injection. This study indicated that the injected MSCs were confined to the subretinal layer of experimented eyes and that no systemic migration occurred in the rat model [103]. Figure 5 shows rat retinal cell phenotypes exhibiting modest level of human MSCs marker, as observed by confocal microscopy. Colocalization of stem 121 (mesenchymal stem cell marker, red color in Figure 5) with rhodopsin (green), GFAP (Müller glial cells, green color in Figure 5), and PKC-α (bipolar cells, green color in Figure 5) [103] was found, implying that MSCs could have differentiated into specific retinal cell phenotypes upon activation by cytokines released by the dying cells or fused with the degenerating cells to rescue tissue death [104, 105]. It is noteworthy that other studies have also demonstrated differentiation of human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs into neurons [106], glia [107], and retinal progenitor cells [108]. Hence, introduction of hWJ-MSCs might be beneficial in inducing certain level of cell repair or regeneration in retinal degeneration.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Tracking of injected human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs in an RP rat model (Royal College of Surgeons rats) with microcomputed tomography. Microcomputed tomography images show localization of gold-loaded human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs in the right eye (a) on day one. The cells were found to be retained in the eye without further migration at day thirty (b) and day seventy (c) after transplantation. PKH 26 (labelled red) indicated the subretinal site of human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs after cell transplantation at week two. Modified with permission from Creative Commons Attribution License [103].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Observation of differentiation of human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs into retinal cell phenotypes in RCS rats by confocal microscopy. Confocal microscopy picture of the whole eye (A) and magnified pictures of the transplanted region (B–D). The red box indicates the magnified region, and the white arrow demonstrates the transplanted region. The antibodies used were anti-PKC-α (bipolar cell), anti-human/rat rhodopsin (rod photoreceptor), anti-human stem 121 (MSC), and anti-GFAP (Müller glial cells). DAPI was used to stain the nucleus in the retinal layer. Colocalization of DAPI (blue) and stem 121 (red) with PKC-α (green), GFAP (green), and rhodopsin (green) was found at day seventy after transplantation, suggesting that human Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs have the ability to differentiate into retinal neurons or to fuse with the degenerating neurons. Scale bar indicates 10 μm. Modified with permission from Creative Commons Attribution License [103].

However, the most significant barrier for successful visual restoration has been the failure of these neuron-derived stem cells to integrate into the retinal circuitry. In central nervous system, stem cells and its neuron derivatives were reported to successfully integrate into the host neural circuitry [109112]. On the contrary, the integration of transplanted cells might be influenced by the molecular predisposition in the damaged eye tissues, which could vary even between different regions [111] and the ontogenetic stage of transplanted neurons [104]. MacLaren et al. first demonstrated that physiologically older retinal tissues showed predilection and tissue acceptance to later ontogenetic stage of transplanted retinal cells, that is, immature postmitotic photoreceptors over neural progenitor cells [104]. Human ESCs-directed differentiated retinal cells could migrate and integrate into the retinal layer and form synapses in CRX −/− transgenic mice following intravitreal injection at birth or postnatal day 1 [113]. Conversely, there is also a report that ESCs-derived neural stem cells showed lesser migration and integration in the retina. To prove that ontogenetic stage of transplanted neurons would also determine the level of integration, West et al. used three-dimensional culture of mouse ESCs with overexpression of Rax genes to direct generation of retinal neuron cells at different time points to establish an equivalent retinal developmental stage for a retinal cell integration study [114]. Unfortunately, their results were not able to prove that the transplantation of photoreceptors at the late ontogenetic stage has better integration into the retinal layer. However, a significant reduction of tumorigenic formation in the retina was observed when photoreceptors were used than when ESCs were used. The difference in the gene expression profile of the different ontogenetic stage of stem cells or progenitors may not mimic the native characteristics of retinal neurons, hence, an incomplete integration into the retinal circuitry. The characteristics of transplanted cells can be significantly affected by the choice of culture methods [115]. Generally, future studies should widen focus on the determination of geographical protein expression in different ocular disorders and identification of similarities in gene expression, rather than mere dependence on morphological observation or in vitro functional studies. It is hoped that these efforts would provide clue on tissue predilection over specific stem cells or its neuron derivatives for maximum therapeutic efficacy.

There is also a suggestion that concomitant transplantation of stem cells with telocytes may help restore the microenvironment. Telocytes are interstitial cells that reside in close contact with stem cells (Figure 6) and may be responsible for the transfer of bioactive molecules (nutrients and paracrine factors) among neighboring cells such as nerve cells and blood vessels [116]. The presence of telocytes has been reported in skeletal muscle [116], uterus [117], skin [118], heart [119], digestive tract [120], lung [121], and iris and uvea of mouse eyes [122].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Electron microscopy pictures of telocyte-putative stem cell junctions observed in the human heart. The picture describes the contact point (arrowheads) among a putative stem cell and a telocyte (blue color). Broader planar contacts (double arrows) can be observed. (a) The average distance between the putative stem cell and plasma membranes of telopode, Tp, is 43 ± 20.3 nm (min: 20.3 nm; max: 90.6 nm). E, endothelial cell; sv, shed vesicles; CM, cardiomyocyte. (b) High magnification on a consecutive ultrathin region of the rectangular site indicated in (a) describes the geometry of the 8 μm long heterocellular connections; plasma membranes of tight-fitting apposed sectors (double arrows); dot contacts (arrowheads) change with planar contacts. A small cellular projection of putative stem cell (arrow) is located on a small recess of the telocyte. Thick nanostructures (15–20 nm) can be found with connection of the plasma membranes of the cells (white arrowheads). Bars represent 2 μm. Modified with permission from Creative Commons Attribution License [116].

Advanced techniques have also used a denuded amniotic membrane as a substratum for epithelial cell culture and stratification [123] and used cord blood serum to replace xenobiotic material [124] for conjunctival or corneal transplant. Recently, there is also research effort in developing a new mode of delivery of stem cells through direct application of contact lenses on the ocular surface [125]. Observation of successful stratified epithelization on a corneal wound bed in a rabbit model of limbal stem cell deficiency following application of modified-contact lens (with plasma polymer with high acid functional group) cultured with limbal cells has high clinical indications, suggesting that surgery for corneal transplant may not be needed in the future [125]. Laboratory procedures are getting standardized with simple protocol for culturing limbal cells to adopt with many cell sources [126]. Markers like Keratin 14 is used to map the distribution of precursor cells of cornea and suggested for corneal renewal with stem cells for alternative regenerative therapy [127]. Also to strengthen the universal standard in techniques, good manufacturer practice based on UK facilities on ocular surface reconstruction is suggested for use outside the UK [128].

4. Current Use of Stem Cells for Ocular Disorders

4.1. Retinal Degeneration

Retinal degeneration is a medical condition that affects the health and welfare of adults and children in the developed world. It represents a group of blinding diseases that include age-related macular disease, glaucoma, optic neuropathies, and retinal vascular complication. Many clinical trials were performed to develop treatments for these diseases. However, it was reported that those approaches were still unable to entirely cure the disease. Interestingly, a stem cell-based treatment shows an extraordinary potential to rectify some of these diseases. In the past few years, studies strongly propose that stem-cell-based therapy has the ability to correct defective function of retina photoreceptors [114, 126], ganglion cells, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [129, 130], and optic nerve [131, 132].

Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells (RPE) and Age-Related Macular Disease (ARMD). The macula enables people to read, process faces, and drive. Degeneration of the RPE leads to malformation at the macular area of the central vision at the initial phase and eventually progressive loss of central vision. This medical condition, known as age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), contributes to the highest cases of blindness in the elderly population globally [92, 133].

ARMD could be present either in wet or in dry forms (wet and dry ARMD) [134]. Wet ARMD manifests as neovascularization, which can be successfully managed with monthly inoculation of antiangiogenic drugs such as Lucentis [135]. Although effective in treating wet ARMD, the monthly injection into the eye causes discomfort and inconvenience to the patient and is expensive [136]. In contrast, dry ARMD presents as drusenoid aggregates under the basal side of the RPE layer at the early phase. These aggregations will lead to geographic atrophy with pronounced loss of the RPE and photoreceptors at later stage. Most of the ARMD cases (80 to 90% patients) occurred due to the dry form as no effective treatments have been found to date.

Currently, clinical trials using RPE-derived human from ESCs and other stem cell-derived therapy are ongoing and becoming a promising approach for the treatment of ARMD. Several companies and institutions are actively involved in stem cell research to treat various ocular diseases, including institutions in Japan, USA, Europe, South America, China, Iran, Taiwan, and South Korea. To date, stem cell therapies have been administered to over 200 patients globally. Schwartz and his colleagues [72, 130] performed clinical trials on patients affected by dry ARMD (NCT01344993) and Stargardt's macular dystrophy (NCT01345006) [72]. In these trials, the researchers injected 50,000 to 200,000 hESC-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells into the worst-affected retina of the patients. Figure 7 shows fundus images taken from the patients following transplantation with hESCs-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells. There were increases in the area size and subretinal pigmentation of patches of transplanted cells in 72% of the treated patients with dry ARMD and Stargardt's macular dystrophy at 3–15 months later [72]. Figures 7(b) and 7(c) showed that the patch of transplanted cells, which were present typically at the boundary of atrophic lesion on the eye of dry ARMD patients, became larger and more pigmented within 6 months. Meanwhile, in a patient with Stargardt's macular dystrophy, patches of pigmented cells were found around the boundary of baseline atrophy in retinal pigment epithelium layer (Figure 7(e)) and appeared more prominent after 12 months of transplantation (Figure 7(f)). Figure 7(g) shows preoperative image of another Stargardt's macular dystrophic patient with a large central area of atrophy. Six months later after transplantation, the superior half of the atrophic lesion was totally filled in by the transplanted retinal pigment epithelial cells (Figure 7(h)). The filled area became larger in size and more pigmented sites were seen after 15 months of transplantation (Figure 7(i)) [72]. It is important to emphasize that the vision-related quality of life was enhanced in both patients of atrophic ARMD and Stargardt's macular dystrophy. None of the patients have reported signs of abnormal tissue formation at either the local or ectopic site of injections or immune rejections even four months after injection [72].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Pictures of eye fundus with pigmentation where retinal pigment epithelium differentiated from human ESCs was transplanted. (a–c) Color fundus pictures and images of spectral domain-optical coherence tomography at baseline of patient eyes of ARMD (dotted circle indicates an outline of the site of cell transplantation) and at an eye after 3 and 6 months of the transplantation. A pigmented patch of transplanted cells (arrows in (b) and (c)) grows bigger and has more pigmentation in six months. Optical coherence tomography (inset of figures) indicates the existence of cells on the inner sites of Bruch's membrane at six months compared with the baseline of the eye. (d–f) Color fundus pictures and pictures of spectral domain-optical coherence tomography at baseline of patient eyes of Stargardt's macular dystrophy (dotted circle indicates an outline of the site of cell transplantation) and an eye after six and twelve months after transplantation. Patches of transplanted cells exist around the edge of baseline atrophy in retinal pigment epithelium (e), which grow more significant after twelve months (arrows in (f)). Pictures of spectral domain-optical coherence tomography at baseline (d) and six months (e) indicate that the enhancement of pigmentation is found at the level of normal monolayer retinal pigment epithelium engraftment, the retinal pigment epithelium, and survival at six months (arrows in (e)), which is close to the site of bare Bruch's membrane being lack of native retinal pigment epithelium. (g–i) Color fundus pictures of a patient of Stargardt's macular dystrophy (dotted circle indicates an outline of the transplantation site). A big central site of atrophy can be seen on the preoperative picture (g). A site of transplantation of retinal pigment epithelium cells can be seen at the superior half of the atrophic lesion at six months (h), which grows bigger and has more pigmentation at fifteen months (i). Copyright 2015. Modified with permission from Elsevier Ltd. [72].

It should be mentioned that Professor Takahashi's group [137141] at Kyoto University has been studying the transplantation of retinal pigmented epithelium cells into ARMD patients, which are differentiated from human iPSCs reprogrammed from patient cells. The tissue has maintained its brownish color, which is a sign that it has not been attacked by the immune system [142].

Ocata Therapeutics (formerly known as Advanced Cell Technology) has sponsored the trials at the Jules Stein Eye Institute, Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Wills Eye Institute and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Neurotech Pharmaceuticals (NCT00447954) has conducted a trial using encapsulated, modified human RPE cells to express ciliary neurotrophic factor for intraocular implantation into ARMD patients. Another report (NCT01518127) shows that Siqueira has been engaged in wet ARMD treatment using bone marrow-derived stem cells in a prospective phase I/II clinical trial [143]. Unfortunately, the complete outcomes have not yet been posted in the clinical trial registry of US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) despite the fact that the trial was ended in December 2015. Other institutes, such as CHA Bio & Diostech (NCT01674829), Janssen R&D (NCT01226628), University of California, Davis Eye Center (NCT01736059) [83], University College London, Moorfields Eye Hospital (NCT01691261) [144], Hollywood Eye Institute (NCT02024269), and Stem Cells Inc. (NCT01632527) [145], were also engaged in stem cell therapy for ARMD.

4.2. Glaucoma

Glaucoma is the most common neurodegenerative disease in the inner part of retina. Prevalence models predict an increase of glaucoma incidence to 79.6 million by 2020 worldwide, a jump from 60.5 million in 2010 [11]. Similar to other neurodegenerative disorders, the loss of the nerve cell population from the central nervous system can be used to predict the risk of glaucoma. Additionally, signs of glutamate toxicity, oxidative stress, impaired axonal transport, and reactive glial changes are also well-characterized in glaucoma [146, 147]. However, in glaucoma, retinal ganglion cells (RGC) predominantly die, which leads to the degeneration of the optic nerve and disconnecting the communication of signals from the retina to the brain.

Increases in age and raised intraocular pressure can lead to the occurrence of glaucoma. Diagnosis and prescription of a suitable treatment for glaucoma can be too late as patients may present asymptomatically until the end stage of the disease, which results in significant loss of visual function. Clinically verified treatments such as medication and eye surgery could delay the development of the glaucoma by reducing intraocular pressure but fail to halt the disease entirely to prevent loss of vision [148]. As of the date of this review, two registered clinical trials (NCT01920867 and NCT02330978) are recruiting patients for glaucoma treatment with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The safety of autologous stem cells derived from adipose tissue is also currently being tested in a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02144103) for glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Additionally, Dr. Goldberg at the University of California has tested the treatment of ciliary neurotrophic factor on primary open angle glaucoma patients at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami (NCT01408472). Several preclinical models have proven that ciliary neurotrophic factor could augment the survival and renewability of retinal ganglion cells [149, 150].

4.3. Optic Nerve Disease

The optic nerve can lead to various pathologies due to intraorbital, intracranial, intrinsic, or systemic disorders. Optic nerve diseases could also lead to life- and vision-threatening conditions [151]. Neural loss from the optic nerve is a frequently occurring, irreversible blinding pathology that involves optic light-sensing tissue. Similar to the brain, the eye, which is a part of the central nervous system, will not be able to restore neuron loss after the occurrence of disease [148]. The patterns of optic nerve diseases provide information to the researcher to help understand the fundamental pathological activity and establish a method to enhance advanced detection and treatment strategies [148]. Recently, Dr. Jamadar worked in a clinical trial (NCT01834079) at Chaitanya Hospital, Pune, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using bone marrow-derived autologous cells for treating optic nerve disease. It is hoped that the primary outcome of reducing degeneration of the optic nerve will also lead to improvement in visual function and decreased intracranial hypertension. Neurotech Pharmaceuticals also used similar RPE cell implants to administer CNTF to patients with optic nerve stroke in a separate phase I clinical trial (NCT01411657).

4.4. Other Retinal Diseases

Retinal diseases other than the major ocular diseases discussed above also cause problems. These diseases include retinal detachment and retinal vascular complications. Retinal detachment is a medical condition in which the retina separates from the back of the eye. In a case report by Wilkes et al. [152], one in 10,000 people faces this problem per year. As the detachment period increases, the visual recovery reduces at an exponential rate after macula-off retinal detachment [153]. With modern surgical techniques, such as scleral buckling, pneumatic retinopexy, and pars plana vitrectomy, we can anticipate more than a 90% success rate for anatomical repair [154]. Although these treatments show positive results anatomically, the visual result still remains displeasing due to the enduring functional injury to the macula [155].

Clinical trials for treating retinal detachment began in the 1980s. A report by Brinton states that of 106 cases of eye trauma, 55 eyes (52%) attained final visual acuity of 20/100 after surgery [156]. The researchers also found that patients who engaged in later vitrectomy did not achieve a better final visual outcome than those who engaged in early vitrectomy within 14 days of impairment. In a separate study, Burton found that 53% of patients who experienced macula-off retinal detachments and underwent early surgery reached visual acuity of 20/20 to 20/50 [153]. However, patients with long-standing detachments were not able to reap functional benefits after surgery. A case reported by Suzuki and Hirose in 1997 states that after 3 months of total retinal detachment, vision was recovered in a patient with no light perception (NLP) [157]. After undergoing two surgeries, the patient recovered counting fingers (CF) vision. The scientists hypothesized that some retinal receptors were capable of eluding the failure. Although all of these trials showed a positive result in patient visual function recovery, the treatment is applicable to only early stage impairment and is costly and inconvenient. The use of stem cell-based therapy in retinal detachment cases might be one of the alternative treatments for early or late stage retinal detachment. For instance, fibrovascular scarring in ARMD, DR, ROP, and neovascular glaucoma [158] can be attenuated by introduction of MSCs. The scar tissue could prevent reattachment of retina [159]. MSCs could also neutralize reactive oxygen species in injured eye tissue and secrete various cytokines and growth factors including hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), interleukin 10, and adrenomedullin, which has antifibrotic properties [160].

Some of the commonly arising retinal diseases that lead to vision loss are associated with retinal vascular complications. Of these diseases, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular oedema (DMO), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are of definite epidemiological significance and lead to blindness. Diabetic retinopathy is the third most dominant source of profound visual function impairment and blindness, followed by RVO [161]. In addition to RVO and PDR, ischemic retinopathies are also familiar diseases involved in vasodegeneration. This situation leads to hypoxia, which provokes the release of cytokines and growth factor in neighboring tissues [162] and then leakage of blood vessels and neovascularization, which has a functionally negative effect on optics.

Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF antibodies and corticosteroids or laser photocoagulation are the contemporary clinical treatments that help attenuate vascular leakage and macular oedema. However, these treatments cause undesirable side effects and do not resolve the fundamental pathology. The vasodegeneration that occurs in the retina is primarily due to the loss of endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and pericytes, finally resulting in vascular blockage and hypoxia [162]. An ongoing clinical trial (NCT02119689), which started since 2011, has aimed to study on the impaired function of endothelial progenitor cells in patients of diabetic retinopathy. Stitt et al. hypothesized that the introduction of vascular stem cells such as endothelial progenitor cells can recondition the retinal nerve diseases by repairing and restoring the damaged vessel [163]. EyeCyte Inc. develops endothelial progenitor cells for use as angiogenic therapy in response to clinical indications specific to retinal nerve diseases, particularly those of ischemic diseases [148, 164, 165]. Additionally, the University of Sao Paulo has sponsored Dr. Ruben's trial using intravitreal injections of bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+ cells) for treating ischemic and diabetic retinopathies (NCT01518842). A subset of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, which are proangiogenic, could work in synergy with endothelial cells to repair damaged blood vessels.

5. Conclusion

Stem cell-based therapy holds an extraordinary prospective in improving the lives of people who suffer from visual disorders. Research in this area will continue to grow to develop new remedies in treating and preventing the problem of vision loss. Interestingly, stem cell-based therapy is not a one-stop general remedy; however, it carries a promising future in producing new biological elements used to treat vision loss.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Fundamental Research Grants Scheme (FRGS), Ministry of Educations, Malaysia, under Grant no. 5524401. This work was also supported by the Putra Grant, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia (9436300), and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Grant no. 104-2221-E-008-107-MY3. Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Science Research Centre, King Saud University, and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are also acknowledged.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors' Contributions

Padma Priya Sivan, Sakinah Syed, and Pooi-Ling Mok contributed equally to this paper.

References

  • 1.Shichida Y., Matsuyama T. Evolution of opsins and phototransduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1531):2881–2895. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jonas J. B., George R., Asokan R., et al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in central and south Asia: 1990–2010. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014;98(5):592–598. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bourne R. R. A., Jonas J. B., Flaxman S. R., et al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990–2010. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014;98(5):629–638. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vassilev Z. P., Ruigómez A., Soriano-Gabarró M., Rodŕıguez L. A. G. Diabetes, cardiovascular morbidity, and risk of age-related macular degeneration in a primary care population. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2015;56(3):1585–1592. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng C. Y., Yamashiro K., Chen L. J., et al. New loci and coding variants confer risk for age-related macular degeneration in East Asians. Nature Communications. 2015;6, article 6063 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akhtar S., Ahmed A., Randhawa M. A., et al. Prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in South Asia: causes, outcomes, and possible remedies. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2013;31(4):413–423. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v31i4.19975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu X., Lyu D., Dong X., He J., Yao K. Hypertension and risk of cataract: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114012.e114012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sayin N., Kara N., Pekel G. Ocular complications of diabetes mellitus. World Journal of Diabetes. 2015;6(1):92–108. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ye J., He J., Wang C., et al. Smoking and risk of age-related cataract: a meta-analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2012;53(7):3885–3895. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thylefors B., Negrel A.-D., Pararajasegaram R., Dadzie K. Y. Global data on blindness. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1995;73(1):115–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Quigley H., Broman A. T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2006;90(3):262–267. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jonas J. B., Kamppeter B. A., Harder B., Vossmerbaeumer U., Sauder G., Spandau U. H. M. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema: a prospective, randomized study. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2006;22(3):200–207. doi: 10.1089/jop.2006.22.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hou H.-Y., Liang H.-L., Wang Y.-S., et al. A therapeutic strategy for choroidal neovascularization based on recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the sites of lesions. Molecular Therapy. 2010;18(10):1837–1845. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stahl A., Smith L. E. H. An eye for discovery. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2010;120(9):3008–3011. doi: 10.1172/jci44158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mok P.-L., Leong C.-F., Cheong S.-K. Cellular mechanisms of emerging applications of mesenchymal stem cells. Malaysian Journal of Pathology. 2013;35(1):17–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Achyut B. R., Varma N. R., Arbab A. S. Application of umbilical cord blood derived stem cells in diseases of the nervous system. Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2014;4, article 202 doi: 10.4172/2157-7633.1000202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar S. S., Alarfaj A. A., Munusamy M. A., et al. Recent developments in β-cell differentiation of pluripotent stem cells induced by small and large molecules. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014;15(12):23418–23447. doi: 10.3390/ijms151223418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen T., Wang F., Wu M., Wang Z. Z. Development of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2015;116(7):1179–1189. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simons B. D., Clevers H. Strategies for homeostatic stem cell self-renewal in adult tissues. Cell. 2011;145(6):851–862. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hwang N. S., Varghese S., Elisseeff J. Controlled differentiation of stem cells. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2008;60(2):199–214. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Seita J., Weissman I. L. Hematopoietic stem cell: self-renewal versus differentiation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine. 2010;2(6):640–653. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Junqueira L. C. U., Mescher A. L. Junqueira's Basic Histology: Text and Atlas. 12th. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carlson B. M. Human Embryology and Developmental Biology. 4th. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Mosby/Elsevier; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fuhrmann S. Eye morphogenesis and patterning of the optic vesicle. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 2010;93:61–84. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385044-7.00003-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Creuzet S., Vincent C., Couly G. Neural crest derivatives in ocular and periocular structures. International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2005;49(2-3):161–171. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041937sc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heavner W., Pevny L. Eye development and retinogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2012;4(12) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008391.a008391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moshiri A., Close J., Reh T. A. Retinal stem cells and regeneration. International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2004;48(8-9):1003–1014. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041870am. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gehring W. J. The master control gene for morphogenesis and evolution of the eye. Genes to Cells. 1996;1(1):11–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.11011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chow R. L., Altmann C. R., Lang R. A., Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Development. 1999;126(19):4213–4222. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.19.4213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tucker P., Laemle L., Munson A., et al. The eyeless mouse mutation (ey1) removes an alternative start codon from the Rx/rax homeobox gene. Genesis. 2001;31(1):43–53. doi: 10.1002/gene.10003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Furukawa T., Kozak C. A., Cepko C. L. rax, a novel paired-type homeobox gene, shows expression in the anterior neural fold and developing retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(7):3088–3093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zuber M. E., Gestri G., Viczian A. S., Barsacchi G., Harris W. A. Specification of the vertebrate eye by a network of eye field transcription factors. Development. 2003;130(21):5155–5167. doi: 10.1242/dev.00723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Martínez-Morales J. R., Rodrigo I., Bovolenta P. Eye development: a view from the retina pigmented epithelium. BioEssays. 2004;26(7):766–777. doi: 10.1002/bies.20064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martínez-Morales J. R., Dolez V., Rodrigo I., et al. OTX2 activates the molecular network underlying retina pigment epithelium differentiation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(24):21721–21731. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m301708200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu W., Lagutin O. V., Mende M., Streit A., Oliver G. Six3 activation of Pax6 expression is essential for mammalian lens induction and specification. The EMBO Journal. 2006;25(22):5383–5395. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mathers P. H., Grinberg A., Mahon K. A., Jamrich M. The Rx homeobox gene is essential for vertebrate eye development. Nature. 1997;387(6633):603–607. doi: 10.1038/42475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Novak A., Guo C., Yang W., Nagy A., Lobe C. G. Function of Rx, but not Pax6, is essential for the formation of retinal progenitor cells in mice. Genesis. 2000;28(3-4):135–142. doi: 10.1002/1526-968X(200011/12)28:3/4<135::AID-GENE70>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bharti K., Nguyen M.-T. T., Skuntz S., Bertuzzi S., Arnheiter H. The other pigment cell: specification and development of the pigmented epithelium of the vertebrate eye. Pigment Cell Research. 2006;19(5):380–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2006.00318.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Macdonald R., Barth K. A., Xu Q., Holder N., Mikkola I., Wilson S. W. Midline signalling is required for Pax gene regulation and patterning of the eyes. Development. 1995;121(10):3267–3278. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.10.3267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yun S., Saijoh Y., Hirokawa K. E., et al. Lhx2 links the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that control optic cup formation. Development. 2009;136(23):3895–3906. doi: 10.1242/dev.041202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bharti K., Liu W., Csermely T., Bertuzzi S., Arnheiter H. Alternative promoter use in eye development: the complex role and regulation of the transcription factor MITF. Development. 2008;135(6):1169–1178. doi: 10.1242/dev.014142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rowan S., Chen C.-M. A., Young T. L., Fisher D. E., Cepko C. L. Transdifferentiation of the retina into pigmented cells in ocular retardation mice defines a new function of the homeodomain gene Chx10. Development. 2004;131(20):5139–5152. doi: 10.1242/dev.01300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Galy A., Néron B., Planque N., Saule S., Eychène A. Activated MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK-1) induces transdifferentiation of pigmented epithelium into neural retina. Developmental Biology. 2002;248(2):251–264. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zou C., Levine E. M. Vsx2 controls eye organogenesis and retinal progenitor identity via homeodomain and non-homeodomain residues required for high affinity DNA binding. PLoS Genetics. 2012;8(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002924.e1002924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao S., Hung F.-C., Colvin J. S., et al. Patterning the optic neuroepithelium by FGF signaling and Ras activation. Development. 2001;128(24):5051–5060. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.24.5051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cai Z., Feng G.-S., Zhang X. Temporal requirement of the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 in establishing the neuronal fate in early retinal development. Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30(11):4110–4119. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4364-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reh T. A., Nagy T., Gretton H. Retinal pigmented epithelial cells induced to transdifferentiate to neurons by laminin. Nature. 1987;330(6143):68–71. doi: 10.1038/330068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mochii M., Mazaki Y., Mizuno N., Hayashi H., Eguchi G. Role of mitf in differentiation and transdifferentiation of chicken pigmented epithelial cell. Developmental Biology. 1998;193(1):47–62. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhao L., Saitsu H., Sun X., Shiota K., Ishibashi M. Sonic hedgehog is involved in formation of the ventral optic cup by limiting Bmp4 expression to the dorsal domain. Mechanisms of Development. 2010;127(1-2):62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Murali D., Yoshikawa S., Corrigan R. R., et al. Distinct developmental programs require different levels of Bmp signaling during mouse retinal development. Development. 2005;132(5):913–923. doi: 10.1242/dev.01673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kubota R., Hokoc J. N., Moshiri A., McGuire C., Reh T. A. A comparative study of neurogenesis in the retinal ciliary marginal zone of homeothermic vertebrates. Developmental Brain Research. 2002;134(1-2):31–41. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(01)00287-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mayer E. J., Hughes E. H., Carter D. A., Dick A. D. Nestin positive cells in adult human retina and in epiretinal membranes. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2003;87(9):1154–1158. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.9.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Okada T. S. Phenotypic expression of embryonic neural retinal cells in cell culture. Vision Research. 1981;21(1):83–86. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Goldman D. Müller glial cell reprogramming and retina regeneration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;15(7):431–442. doi: 10.1038/nrn3723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bäumer N., Marquardt T., Stoykova A., et al. Retinal pigmented epithelium determination requires the redundant activities of Pax2 and Pax6. Development. 2003;130(13):2903–2915. doi: 10.1242/dev.00450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grondona J. M., Kastner P., Gansmuller A., Décimo D., Chambon P., Mark M. Retinal dysplasia and degeneration in RARβ2/RARγ2 compound mutant mice. Development. 1996;122(7):2173–2188. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.7.2173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Molotkov A., Molotkova N., Duester G. Retinoic acid guides eye morphogenetic movements via paracrine signaling but is unnecessary for retinal dorsoventral patterning. Development. 2006;133(10):1901–1910. doi: 10.1242/dev.02328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gage P. J., Suh H., Camper S. A. Dosage requirement of Pitx2 for development of multiple organs. Development. 1999;126(20):4643–4651. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.20.4643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yang X.-J. Roles of cell-extrinsic growth factors in vertebrate eye pattern formation and retinogenesis. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2004;15(1):91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Allen B. L., Tenzen T., McMahon A. P. The Hedgehog-binding proteins Gas1 and Cdo cooperate to positively regulate Shh signaling during mouse development. Genes & Development. 2007;21(10):1244–1257. doi: 10.1101/gad.1543607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Adler R., Belecky-Adams T. L. The role of bone morphogenetic proteins in the differentiation of the ventral optic cup. Development. 2002;129(13):3161–3171. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.13.3161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Westenskow P., Piccolo S., Fuhrmann S. β-Catenin controls differentiation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the mouse optic cup by regulating Mitf and Otx2 expression. Development. 2009;136(15):2505–2510. doi: 10.1242/dev.032136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Reh T. A., Levine E. M. Multipotential stem cells and progenitors in the vertebrate retina. Journal of Neurobiology. 1998;36(2):206–220. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199808)36:2<206::AID-NEU8>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Davis-Silberman N., Ashery-Padan R. Iris development in vertebrates; genetic and molecular considerations. Brain Research. 2008;1192:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Asami M., Sun G., Yamaguchi M., Kosaka M. Multipotent cells from mammalian iris pigment epithelium. Developmental Biology. 2007;304(1):433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fuhrmann S. Wnt signaling in eye organogenesis. Organogenesis. 2008;4(2):60–67. doi: 10.4161/org.4.2.5850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cvekl A., Duncan M. K. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation during lens development. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2007;26(6):555–597. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Roozafzoon R., Lashay A., Vasei M., et al. Dental pulp stem cells differentiation into retinal ganglion-like cells in a three dimensional network. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2015;457(2):154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kim K., Doi A., Wen B., et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2010;467(7313):285–290. doi: 10.1038/nature09342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vaskova E. A., Stekleneva A. E., Medvedev S. P., Zakian S. M. ‘Epigenetic memory’ phenomenon in induced pluripotent stem cells. Acta Naturae. 2013;5(19):15–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Padma Priya S., Higuchi A., Abu Fanas S., et al. Odontogenic epithelial stem cells: hidden sources. Laboratory Investigation. 2015;95(12):1344–1352. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2015.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schwartz S. D., Regillo C. D., Lam B. L., et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt's macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. The Lancet. 2015;385(9967):509–516. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61376-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sowden J. C. ESC-derived retinal pigmented epithelial cell transplants in patients: so far, so good. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(5):537–538. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nishida K., Yamato M., Hayashida Y., et al. Functional bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface. Transplantation. 2004;77(3):379–385. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000110320.45678.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fernandez-San Jose P., Corton M., Blanco-Kelly F., et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing improves the diagnosis of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa in Spanish patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2015;56(4):2173–2182. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu J.-T., Chen Y.-L., Chen W.-C., et al. Role of pigment epithelium-derived factor in stem/progenitor cell-associated neovascularization. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2012;2012:10. doi: 10.1155/2012/871272.871272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fernandez-San Jose P., Blanco-Kelly F., Corton M., et al. Prevalence of Rhodopsin mutations in autosomal dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa in Spain: clinical and analytical review in 200 families. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2015;93(1):e38–e44. doi: 10.1111/aos.12486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hartong D. T., Berson E. L., Dryja T. P. Retinitis pigmentosa. The Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1795–1809. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69740-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fliegauf M., Benzing T., Omran H. When cilia go bad: cilia defects and ciliopathies. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8(11):880–893. doi: 10.1038/nrm2278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Falkner-Radler C. I., Krebs I., Glittenberg C., et al. Human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) transplantation: outcome after autologous RPE-choroid sheet and RPE cell-suspension in a randomised clinical study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;95(3):370–375. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.176305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Siqueira R. C., Messias A., Voltarelli J. C., Messias K., Arcieri R. S., Jorge R. Resolution of macular oedema associated with retinitis pigmentosa after intravitreal use of autologous BM-derived hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2013;48(4):612–613. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sanges D., Romo N., Simonte G., et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling triggers neuron reprogramming and regeneration in the mouse retina. Cell Reports. 2013;4(2):271–286. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Park S. S., Caballero S., Bauer G., et al. Long-term effects of intravitreal injection of GMP-grade bone-marrow-derived CD34+ cells in NOD-SCID mice with acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2012;53(2):986–994. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Blazejewska E. A., Schlötzer-Schrehardt U., Zenkel M., et al. Corneal limbal microenvironment can induce transdifferentiation of hair follicle stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(3):642–652. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Oh J. Y., Kim M. K., Shin M. S., et al. The anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008;26(4):1047–1055. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhao Y.-S., Zhao K.-X., Wang X.-L., Chen Y.-X., Wang L., Mu Q.-J. Effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on retinal cell apoptosis in premature rats with retinopathy. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012;14(12):971–975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cejkova J., Trosan P., Cejka C., et al. Suppression of alkali-induced oxidative injury in the cornea by mesenchymal stem cells growing on nanofiber scaffolds and transferred onto the damaged corneal surface. Experimental Eye Research. 2013;116:312–323. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mesentier-Louro L. A., Zaverucha-do-Valle C., da Silva A. J., et al. Distribution of mesenchymal stem cells and effects on neuronal survival and axon regeneration after optic nerve crush and cell therapy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110722.e110722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Huo D.-M., Dong F.-T., Gao F. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell in the microenviroment of retinitis pigmentosa. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;3(3):216–219. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2010.03.08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhou L., Wang W., Liu Y., et al. Differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells of swine into rod photoreceptors and their integration into the retina. Stem Cells. 2011;29(6):972–980. doi: 10.1002/stem.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chang H.-M., Hung K.-H., Hsu C.-C., Lin T.-C., Chen S.-Y. Using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived conditional medium to attenuate the light-induced photodamaged retina of rats. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2015;78(3):169–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhao J. J., Ouyang H., Luo J., et al. Induction of retinal progenitors and neurons from mammalian Müller glia under defined conditions. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289(17):11945–11951. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m113.532671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Garita-Hernández M., Diaz-Corrales F., Lukovic D., et al. Hypoxia increases the yield of photoreceptors differentiating from mouse embryonic stem cells and improves the modeling of retinogenesis in vitro. Stem Cells. 2013;31(5):966–978. doi: 10.1002/stem.1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lin P.-K., Ke C.-Y., Khor C. N., Cai Y.-J., Lee Y.-J. Involvement of SDF1a and STAT3 in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor rescues optic ischemia-induced retinal function loss by mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2013;54(3):1920–1930. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Assawachananont J., Mandai M., Okamoto S., et al. Transplantation of embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived 3D retinal sheets into retinal degenerative mice. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;2(5):662–674. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Tucker B. A., Park I.-H., Qi S. D., et al. Transplantation of adult mouse iPS cell-derived photoreceptor precursors restores retinal structure and function in degenerative mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018992.e18992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Johnson T. V., Bull N. D., Hunt D. P., Marina N., Tomarev S. I., Martin K. R. Neuroprotective effects of intravitreal mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51(4):2051–2059. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chiou S.-H., Kao C.-L., Peng C.-H., et al. A novel in vitro retinal differentiation model by co-culturing adult human bone marrow stem cells with retinal pigmented epithelium cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;326(3):578–585. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sugitani S., Tsuruma K., Ohno Y., et al. The potential neuroprotective effect of human adipose stem cells conditioned medium against light-induced retinal damage. Experimental Eye Research. 2013;116:254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kelley M. W., Turner J. K., Reh T. A. Regulation of proliferation and photoreceptor differentiation in fetal human retinal cell cultures. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1995;36(7):1280–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Humayun M. S., de Juan E., Jr., del Cerro M., et al. Human neural retinal transplantation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2000;41(10):3100–3106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Runkle E. A., Antonetti D. A. The blood-retinal barrier: structure and functional significance. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2011;686:133–148. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-938-3_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Leow S. N., Luu C. D., Nizam M. H. H., et al. Safety and efficacy of human Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells therapy for retinal degeneration. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128973.e0128973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.MacLaren R. E., Pearson R. A., MacNeil A., et al. Retinal repair by transplantation of photoreceptor precursors. Nature. 2006;444(7116):203–207. doi: 10.1038/nature05161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Shadrin I. Y., Yoon W., Li L., Shepherd N., Bursac N. Rapid fusion between mesenchymal stem cells and cardiomyocytes yields electrically active, non-contractile hybrid cells. Scientific Reports. 2015;5, article 12043 doi: 10.1038/srep12043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kalaszczynska I., Ferdyn K. Wharton's jelly derived mesenchymal stem cells: future of regenerative medicine? Recent findings and clinical significance. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:11. doi: 10.1155/2015/430847.430847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mitchell K. E., Weiss M. L., Mitchell B. M., et al. Matrix cells from Wharton's jelly form neurons and glia. Stem Cells. 2003;21(1):50–60. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.21-1-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hu Y., Liang J., Cui H. P., et al. Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into retinal progenitor cells. Neural Regeneration Research. 2013;8(19):1783–1792. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.19.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhou S., Flamier A., Abdouh M., et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into cone photoreceptors through simultaneous inhibition of BMP, TGFβ and Wnt signaling. Development. 2015;142(19):3294–3306. doi: 10.1242/dev.125385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lunn J. S., Sakowski S. A., Hur J., Feldman E. L. Stem cell technology for neurodegenerative diseases. Annals of Neurology. 2011;70(3):353–361. doi: 10.1002/ana.22487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Skeie J. M., Mahajan V. B. Proteomic landscape of the human choroid-retinal pigment epithelial complex. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(11):1271–1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.2065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Vishwakarma S. K., Bardia A., Tiwari S. K., Paspala S. A. B., Khan A. A. Current concept in neural regeneration research: NSCs isolation, characterization and transplantation in various neurodegenerative diseases and stroke: a review. Journal of Advanced Research. 2014;5(3):277–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2013.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lamba D. A., Gust J., Reh T. A. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived photoreceptors restores some visual function in Crx-deficient mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4(1):73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.West E. L., Gonzalez-Cordero A., Hippert C., et al. Defining the integration capacity of embryonic stem cell-derived photoreceptor precursors. Stem Cells. 2012;30(7):1424–1435. doi: 10.1002/stem.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Brandl C., Grassmann F., Riolfi J., Weber B. Tapping stem cells to target AMD: challenges and prospects. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2015;4(2):282–303. doi: 10.3390/jcm4020282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Gherghiceanu M., Popescu L. M. Cardiac telocytes—their junctions and functional implications. Cell and Tissue Research. 2012;348(2):265–279. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1333-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Cretoiu S. M., Cretoiu D., Marin A., Radu B. M., Popescu L. M. Telocytes: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and electrophysiological characteristics in human myometrium. Reproduction. 2013;145(4):357–370. doi: 10.1530/rep-12-0369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Cretoiu D., Gherghiceanu M., Hummel E., Zimmermann H., Simionescu O., Popescu L. M. FIB-SEM tomography of human skin telocytes and their extracellular vesicles. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2015;19(4):714–722. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Cretoiu D., Hummel E., Zimmermann H., Gherghiceanu M., Popescu L. M. Human cardiac telocytes: 3D imaging by FIB-SEM tomography. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2014;18(11):2157–2164. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Cretoiu D., Cretoiu S. M., Simionescu A. A., Popescu L. M. Telocytes, a distinct type of cell among the stromal cells present in the lamina propria of jejunum. Histology and Histopathology. 2012;27(8):1067–1078. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zheng Y., Cretoiu D., Yan G., Cretoiu S. M., Popescu L. M., Wang X. Comparative proteomic analysis of human lung telocytes with fibroblasts. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2014;18(4):568–589. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Luesma M. J., Gherghiceanu M., Popescu L. M. Telocytes and stem cells in limbus and uvea of mouse eye. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2013;17(8):1016–1024. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Burman S., Sangwan V. Cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2008;2(3):489–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ang L. P.-K., Do T. P., Thein Z. M., et al. Ex vivo expansion of conjunctival and limbal epithelial cells using cord blood serum-supplemented culture medium. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(9):6138–6147. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Brown K. D., Low S., Mariappan I., et al. Plasma polymer-coated contact lenses for the culture and transfer of corneal epithelial cells in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency. Tissue Engineering Part: A. 2014;20(3-4):646–655. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lamba D. A., McUsic A., Hirata R. K., Wang P.-R., Russell D., Reh T. A. Generation, purification and transplantation of photoreceptors derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008763.e8763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Dhamodaran K., Subramani M., Matalia H., Jayadev C., Shetty R., Das D. One for all: a standardized protocol for ex vivo culture of limbal, conjunctival and oral mucosal epithelial cells into corneal lineage. Cytotherapy. 2016;18(4):546–561. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sheth-Shah R., Vernon A. J., Seetharaman S., Neale M. H., Daniels J. T. Regulatory requirements in the good manufacturing practice production of an epithelial cell graft for ocular surface reconstruction. Regenerative Medicine. 2016;11(3):307–320. doi: 10.2217/rme-2015-0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Wang S., Lu B., Girman S., et al. Non-invasive stem cell therapy in a rat model for retinal degeneration and vascular pathology. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009200.e9200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Schwartz S. D., Hubschman J.-P., Heilwell G., et al. Embryonic stem cell trials for macular degeneration: a preliminary report. The Lancet. 2012;379(9817):713–720. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Dahlmann-Noor A., Vijay S., Jayaram H., Limb A., Khaw P. T. Current approaches and future prospects for stem cell rescue and regeneration of the retina and optic nerve. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;45(4):333–341. doi: 10.3129/i10-077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Harper M. M., Grozdanic S. D., Blits B., et al. Transplantation of BDNF-secreting mesenchymal stem cells provides neuroprotection in chronically hypertensive rat eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(7):4506–4515. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Khandhadia S., Cipriani V., Yates J. R. W., Lotery A. J. Age-related macular degeneration and the complement system. Immunobiology. 2012;217(2):127–146. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Anderson D. H., Radeke M. J., Gallo N. B., et al. The pivotal role of the complement system in aging and age-related macular degeneration: hypothesis re-visited. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2010;29(2):95–112. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kourlas H., Abrams P. Ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review. Clinical Therapeutics. 2007;29(9):1850–1861. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Cruess A. F., Berger A., Colleaux K., et al. Canadian expert consensus: optimal treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;47(3):227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Osakada F., Ikeda H., Mandai M., et al. Toward the generation of rod and cone photoreceptors from mouse, monkey and human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnology. 2008;26(2):215–224. doi: 10.1038/nbt1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Ikeda H., Osakada F., Watanabe K., et al. Generation of Rx+/Pax6+ neural retinal precursors from embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(32):11331–11336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500010102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Eiraku M., Takata N., Ishibashi H., et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;472(7341):51–56. doi: 10.1038/nature09941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Jin Z. B., Okamoto S., Osakada F., et al. Modeling retinal degeneration using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017084.e17084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Kamao H., Mandai M., Okamoto S., et al. Characterization of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium cell sheets aiming for clinical application. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;2(2):205–218. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.365 days: nature's 10. Nature. 2014;516(7531):311–319. doi: 10.1038/516311a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Siqueira R. Stem cell therapy for retinal diseases: update. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2011;2, article 50 doi: 10.1186/scrt91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Carr A.-J. F., Smart M. J. K., Ramsden C. M., Powner M. B., da Cruz L., Coffey P. J. Development of human embryonic stem cell therapies for age-related macular degeneration. Trends in Neurosciences. 2013;36(7):385–395. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.McGill T. J., Cottam B., Lu B., et al. Transplantation of human central nervous system stem cells—neuroprotection in retinal degeneration. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;35(3):468–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Kumar D. M., Agarwal N. Oxidative stress in glaucoma: a burden of evidence. Journal of Glaucoma. 2007;16(3):334–343. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000243480.67532.1b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Gupta N., Yücel Y. H. Glaucoma as a neurodegenerative disease. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2007;18(2):110–114. doi: 10.1097/icu.0b013e3280895aea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Bull N. D., Martin K. R. Concise review: toward stem cell-based therapies for retinal neurodegenerative diseases. Stem Cells. 2011;29(8):1170–1175. doi: 10.1002/stem.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Cen L.-P., Luo J.-M., Zhang C.-W., et al. Chemotactic effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor on macrophages in retinal ganglion cell survival and axonal regeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2007;48(9):4257–4266. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Zhang C.-W., Lu Q., You S.-W., et al. CNTF and BDNF have similar effects on retinal ganglion cell survival but differential effects on nitric oxide synthase expression soon after optic nerve injury. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(4):1497–1503. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Riordan-Eva P. Clinical assessment of optic nerve disorders. Eye. 2004;18(11):1161–1168. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Wilkes S. R., Beard C. M., Kurland L. T., Robertson D. M., O'Fallon W. M. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970–1978. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1982;94(5):670–673. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Burton T. C. Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1982;80:475–497. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ross W. H. Visual recovery after macula-off retinal detachment. Eye. 2002;16(4):440–446. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Davidorf F. H., Havener W. H., Lang J. R. Macular vision following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1975;6(4):74–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Brinton G. S., Aaberg T. M., Reeser F. H., Topping T. M., Abrams G. W. Surgical results in ocular trauma involving the posterior segment. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1982;93(3):271–278. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Suzuki R., Hirose T. Visual recovery from no light perception in total retinal detachment with massive subretinal haemorrhage. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1997;81(8):p. 705. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.8.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Friedlander M. Fibrosis and diseases of the eye. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2007;117(3):576–586. doi: 10.1172/jci31030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Jalali S. Retinal detachment. Community Eye Health. 2003;16(46):25–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Jackson W. M., Nesti L. J., Tuan R. S. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for attenuation of scar formation during wound healing. Stem Cell Research and Therapy. 2012;3(3, article 20) doi: 10.1186/scrt111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Bunce C., Xing W., Wormald R. Causes of blind and partial sight certifications in England and Wales: April 2007-March 2008. Eye. 2010;24(11):1692–1699. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Kaur C., Foulds W. S., Ling E. A. Blood-retinal barrier in hypoxic ischaemic conditions: basic concepts, clinical features and management. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2008;27(6):622–647. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Stitt A. W., O'Neill C. L., O'Doherty M. T., Archer D. B., Gardiner T. A., Medina R. J. Vascular stem cells and ischaemic retinopathies. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2011;30(3):149–166. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Chen C. P., Lee Y. J., Chiu S. T., et al. The application of stem cells in the treatment of ischemic diseases. Histology and Histopathology. 2006;21(11):1209–1216. doi: 10.14670/HH-21.1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Fan Y., Shen F., Frenzel T., et al. Endothelial progenitor cell transplantation improves long-term stroke outcome in mice. Annals of Neurology. 2010;67(4):488–497. doi: 10.1002/ana.21919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Zwart I., Hill A. J., Al-Allaf F., et al. Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells are neuroprotective and promote regeneration in a rat optic tract model. Experimental Neurology. 2009;216(2):439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Lund R. D., Wang S., Lu B., et al. Cells isolated from umbilical cord tissue rescue photoreceptors and visual functions in a rodent model of retinal disease. Stem Cells. 2007;25(3):602–611. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Stem Cells International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES