Abstract
Objective
Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy characterized by progressive motor weakness of limbs and areflexia. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the clinical pattern and prognosis of children with Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Materials & Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Pediatric Neurology Unit of Amirkola Children’s Hospital, Babol, Iran during the period of 5 years from October 2008 to September 2013. We assessed the clinical features, results of electrodiagnostic tests, functional status, treatment and outcome of 17 children diagnosed with GBS.
Results
Of 17 (male to female ratio = 1.6:1) children studied, all had motor weakness, 4 children (23.5 %) and cranial nerve palsies. Respiratory paralysis was found in one child requiring assisted ventilation. Antecedent illness preceding GBS was recorded in 7 (41.2%) children. The GBS subtype distribution as per electrodiagnostic studies was as follows: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) in 12 (70.6%) acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) in 3 (17.6%), acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) in 2 (11.8%). IVIG constituted the treatment given in all of the patients. Complete recovery was observed in 16 children and the remaining one child was dependent to wheelchair.
Conclusion
GBS in children is not poor prognostic disorder and our recommendation is administration of IVIG as soon as possible after clinical diagnosis. Except for one child who remained wheelchair bound, there was no mortality or morbidity in long-term observation. Besides, strong limitation of our study was the low number of subjects.
Key Words: Prognosis, Guillain-Barre, Children
Introduction
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune mediated polyradiculoneuropathy with an acute onset and a variable clinical course (1). It is also known as Landry’s paralysis and frequently preceded by an unspecified infection (2). This syndrome manifests as progressive areflexic or hyporeflexive motor paralysis with or without sensory deficit. Weakness typically progress over hours to a few days (2). Autonomic dysfunction is common in GBS. Recovery period in this disorder is shorter in children than adults are and mortality rate in children is about 3-5% (1). Respiratory insufficiency is an ominous event in GBS and can lead to death in these patients.
Besides, autonomic dysfunction is another main cause of mortality in affected children (1,3). Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) is performed to confirm this diagnosis.
IVIG and plasma exchange have made a significant change in the course of the illness (4).
We performed a cross sectional study on the natural history in children with GBS to study their clinical profile using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in addition to supportive management in long-term assessment (from2008 to 2014).
Materials & Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Pediatric Neurology Unit of Amirkola Children’s Hospital, Babol Medical University, Babol, Iran during the period of 5 years from October 2008 to September 2013. The subjects of the study were children < 10 yr of age diagnosed with GBS. We assessed the clinical features, results of electro-diagnostic tests, functional status, treatment instituted and outcome.
A complete neurological examination was conducted including examination of cranial nerves, motor system and sensory system as well as deep tendon reflexes. Electrodiagnostic study was done in all patients and electrophysiological subtypes of GBS were noted. CSF examination was performed in selected hemodynamically stable children.
All children were treated with IVIG in a dose of 2 gm/kg over 2-5 d in addition to conventional supportive and/or intensive respiratory care.
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Chicago, IL, USA) and numerical parametric data were presented as percentages.
This study has been done with approval of the Ethics Committee of the Babol University of Medical Sciences.
All patients’ children were taken informed consent form.
Results
We evaluated 17 children with documented GBS admitted in our hospital and followed them four times (3, 6, 12, 24 months) after discharge. Eleven (64.7%) were male. Age of our patients on admission time ranged from 2 yr to 9 yr (4.4± 1.9). The history of antecedent illness was found in 7 subjects (41.2%) in the preceding two weeks. Of these antecedent illnesses, respiratory tract infection was found in 3 cases (42.9%), diarrhea in 2 cases (28.6%) and nonspecific febrile illness in 2 children (28.6%).
At admission, all 17 children presented with limb weakness. Cranial nerve palsy was observed in 4 (23.5%) children. Of which, 2 had bulbar palsy and 2 children had facial palsy. Respiratory insufficiency was found in one child requiring assisted ventilation. The GBS subtype distribution as per electrodiagnostic studies was as follows: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) in 12 (70.6%), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) in 3 (17.6%) and acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) in 2 (11.8%). NCV (nerve conduction velocity) was performed in all children at first 72 h of admission time except in one child intubated and NCV was done after extubation. CSF analysis was performed in 11 children at 5-7th days of admission and the characteristic feature of albumin-cytological dissociation (<10 mononuclear cells) was observed in only two children. IVIG was administered to all patients (2 gm/kg) in five consecutive days. Physical therapy was ordered for all patients.
We followed all patients for long time. In first visit after about three months, 6 (35.3%) patients had normal neurologic examination. In second visit after about six months, 12 (70.6%) patients were normal. in third visit after about 12 months after discharging from the hospital, 16 (94.1%) patients were normal and had complete motor function with normal deep tendon reflexes and only one child was wheelchair bound and finally in last visit after 24 months (about 2 yr), our findings was similar to third visit.
Discussion
GBS is the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis in infants and children. GBS could be seen in all age groups. We included, 17 cases of <10 yr of age (range 2-9) and 41% of children were below 4 yr. In one study of 61 children younger than 15 yr of age with GBS, found that most of the children who had GBS were below 4 yr, and only one case was seen in the 10-15 yr age group (4).
In our study, male: female ratio was 1.8:1. Dhadke et al., observed a male preponderance in their study with a male: female ratio of 1.5:1 (2). Maneesh Kumar et al., reported a male: female ratio of 2.3:1 (8).
Two third of the cases will develop the neurological signs and symptoms within one to two weeks from the antecedent illness (8). In this study, history of antecedent illness was found in 7 subjects (41.2%) in the preceding two weeks. Dhadke et al., reported respiratory infections as the most common preceding disorder in their study, followed by gastrointestinal infection (2). All subjects in our study presented with limb weakness. Akbayram et al., reported limb weakness in 34/36(94.4%) of children with GBS (6). Cranial nerve palsy was observed in 4 (23.5%) children. Loeffel et al., reported a 50% incidence of cranial nerve palsies in GBS, facial nerve being the commonest (7). Respiratory insufficiency was found in one child requiring assisted ventilation. Akbayram et al, reported respiratory insufficiency and assisted ventilation in 3/36 (8.3%) of children with GBS (6). In our study, the most common form of electrophysiologic form of GBS was AIDP (70.6%). Most of the pediatric patients in the study by Pi-Lien et al., belonged to the AIDP group (3). In Akbayram et al study, AIDP was the most common form (69.4%) (6). CSF analysis was performed in 11 children. Typical CSF finding of less than 10 mononuclear leukocytes/mm3 was found in only 2 cases. Albumino-cytological dissociation in CSF analysis (elevated CSF protein with less than 10 mononuclear WBCs / mm3) was reported in 2 out of 5 children in a recent study (8).
Fortunately, we did not see any death due to GBS in our long-term follow up study, while Akbayram et al, reported 8.3% deaths (3/36) (6). Our study was similar to Maneesh Kumar et al. study (8). (Table 1).
Table 1.
Prognosis (%) | Akbayram S et al(6) | Maneesh Kumar et al(8) | Our study |
---|---|---|---|
Total subjects | 36 | 17 | 17 |
Complete Recovery | 29(80.5%) | 14(82.4%) | 16(94.1%) |
Incomplete Recovery | 4(11.2%) | 3(17.6%) | 1(5.9%) |
Death | 3(8.3%) | - | - |
Finally, complete recovery after last visit (after 24 months) was 16/17 (94.1%) in our study. In Korinthenberg et al study, complete recovery was 92% and in Maneesh Kumar et al. study was 82.4% (8, 9).
In conclusion, GBS is not poor prognostic disorder in children, especially; we administered IVIG as soon as possible after clinical suspicion. Regardless of the severity of disease on admission time and electrophysiological subgroups, a majority achieved complete motor and sensory recovery. Strong limitation of our study was the low number of cases. Except for one child who remained wheelchair bound, there was no mortality or morbidity in long term observation.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to our pediatric neurologic staff (Miss Aghalari) for help us in this study.
Author’s Contribution
Dr Salehiomran participated in design and coordination.
Dr Mahdavi drafted the manuscript and Dr Karimzadeh critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Van Doorn PA, Ruts L, Jacobs BC, et al. Guillain-Barre Syndrome: Clinical features, Pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):939–50. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dhadke SV, Dhadke VN, Bangar SS, Korade MB. Clinical Profile of Guillain Barre Syndrome. J Asso Physicians India. 2013;61:168–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pi-Lien H, Chang W, Huang L et al. A clinical and electrophysiologic survey of childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2004;30(2):86–91. doi: 10.1016/S0887-8994(03)00403-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koul R, Al-Futaisi A, Chacko A et al. Clinical Characteristics of Childhood Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Oman Med J. 2008;23(3):158–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;27(suppl):S21–S24. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Akbayram S, Doan M, Akgün C, Peker E, Sayın R, Aktar F, et al. Clinical features and prognosis with Guillain- Barré syndrome. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2011;14:98–102. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.82793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Loeffel VB, Rossi LN, Mumenyhaler M. The Landry Guillain-Barré syndrome complication prognosis and natural history of 123 cases. J Neural SG. 1977;33:71–79. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(77)90183-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maneesh Kumar, Shrikiran Aroor, Suneel Mundkur, Sandeep Kumar. Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Clinical Study of Twenty Children. J Clin Diagc Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):9–12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/8344.5491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Korinthenberg R, Schulte Monting J. Natural history and treatment effects in Guillain-Barre syndrome: a multicentre study. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74:281–87. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]