Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Child Neurology
. 2016 Spring;10(2):74–81.

Demographic and Clinical Findings in Pediatric Patients Affected by Organic Acidemia

Reza NAJAFI 1, Mahin HASHEMIPOUR 2, Neda MOSTOFIZADEH 2, Mohammadreza GHAZAVI 3, Jafar NASIRI 3, Armindokht SHAHSANAI 4, Fatemeh FAMORI 5, Fatemeh NAJAFI 6, Mohammad MOAFI 7
PMCID: PMC4885158  PMID: 27247587

Abstract

Objective

Metabolic disorders, which involve many different organs, can be ascribed to enzyme deficiency or dysfunction and manifest with a wide range of clinical symptoms. This study evaluated some of the demographic and clinical findings in pediatric patients affected by organic acidemia.

Materials & Methods

This cross-sectional study was part of a larger study conducted in patients with metabolic disorders during a period of 7 years from 2007 to 2014 in Isfahan Province, Iran. Our study covered a wide range of cases from newborn infants (one-week old) to adolescents (children up to the age of 17 years). This study evaluated patients’ demographic information, history of disease, developmental and educational status, clinical and general conditions. Phone and in-person interviews were used to gather information.

Results

Out of 5100 patients screened in this study, 392 patients were affected by one of the different metabolic disorders and 167 individuals were diagnosed as organic acidemia. Propionic acidemia/methyl malonic acidemia (PA/MMA) was the most prevalent form of this metabolic disorder. The frequency of consanguinity was 84.7% in the group of patients. The mortality rate was 18.8% in patients with organic academia.

Conclusion

Each of the metabolic diseases, as a separate entity, is rare; nevertheless, in aggregate they have a somewhat high overall prevalence. These diseases result in mental and developmental disorders in the absence of quick diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Furthermore, more mutations should be identified in societies affected by consanguinity. Further research should also be conducted to determine worthwhile and more-efficient screening methods as well as long term neurological prognosis.

Key Words: Organic academia, Consanguinity, Developmental delay, Early Detection

Introduction

Metabolic disorders, ascribable to enzyme deficiency or dysfunction (especially cofactor deficiency), lead to either excess or lack of special metabolic components (1). These inherited metabolic diseases are mostly revealed during infancy or neonatal ages; however, they can occur at any age, even in adulthood. Genetic defects can result in either catabolism or abnormal anabolism of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and other complex molecules (2). These diseases are generally attributed to default of enzymes constituting metabolic pathways. Genetic defects lead to accumulation of abnormal biochemical substrates that may potentially be toxic. Furthermore, these inherited disorders may result in an excess of biomaterials that do not occur in normal conditions and the body is unable to metabolize (2, 3).

Metabolic disorders have a wide range of clinical symptoms. The prevalence of metabolic diseases varies in accordance with study population characteristics such as race, ethnic structures, or screening programs (4).

Different organs may be involved in metabolic disorders and simultaneously show pathological dysfunction.

Males and females have an equal likelihood of disease in autosomal either dominant or recessive forms. In fact, onset of disease may vary due to environmental factors and the nature of disease. Usually, newborn infants appear healthy at birth but clinical symptoms are developed later in life. More importantly, those of earlier symptoms in life, experience more acute form of the disease (5).

Metabolic disorders are commonly categorized as autosomal recessive form of metabolic disorders (6); for this reason, the history of an infant (sudden death, parental consanguinity) can be used to provide clues of the presence of such a disorder. These diseases potentially cause damage to vital organs (especially the brain) unless proper treatment is started early. Therefore, screening methods facilitating early diagnosis of metabolic diseases can preclude progressive neurological disorders and clinical manifestations that may lead to death (5).

Organic acidemia is classified into five categories as follows (7-10):

1) Branched-chain organic academia

2) Multiple carboxylase deficiency, including holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency and biotinidase deficiency

3) Glutaric aciduria type I

4) Fatty acid oxidation defects

5) Disorders of energy metabolism

During infancy, threatening signs such as lethargy, poor feeding, and vomiting may develop because of one of these disorders; however, none of these clinical signs necessarily has to be present for an individual to have a metabolic disorder. More importantly, early diagnosis and establishment of appropriate treatment strategies can help to prevent the developmental regression and mental retardation. Paraclinical findings including metabolic acidosis, mild or moderate hyperammonemia, ketosis, sepsis-like conditions, bone marrow suppression (11-13), hypoglycemia, hepatic failure, and secondary carnitine deficiency can also help to diagnose the process (13). Diagnosis could be verified through measurement of plasma amino acids as well as the analysis of enzymes and organic acids in urine (14). Unless screening methods are employed, subclinical forms of organic acidemia might be undiagnosed.

Metabolic screening for inherited diseases is not implemented in Middle East countries; however, these diseases are more prevalent in these regions (15).

This study aimed to evaluate some of the demographic and clinical findings in pediatric patients affected by organic acidemia.

Materials & Methods

This cross-sectional study was part of a larger study conducted on patients with metabolic disorders during a period of 7 years (2007 to 2014) in Isfahan Province, central Iran. Our study covered a wide range of cases from newborn infants (age, one week) to 17-yr-old adolescents. Demographic information, history of disease, developmental and educational status, clinical and general conditions were obtained from hospitalized records in children’s hospitals (Imam Hussain, Azzahra, Amin) in Isfahan, Iran, known as third level referral centers and metabolic disorder centers in Isfahan Province. Information of supplementary questionnaire designed for this purpose was collected through phone and in-person interview by assistant professor of endocrinology and metabolic diseases and trained nurses.

Enzymatic and metabolic evaluation of patients’ blood was conducted at the Wagner Stibbe Laboratory in Hanover, Germany. Exclusion criteria were lack of compliance, lack of parental consent, and uncertain paraclinical features. Incidence (Incidence proportion) was estimated based on the Meikle et al., method by dividing the number of live births (n = 602,259) obtained from the Department of Census and Statistics in Isfahan Province to the number of diagnosed cases for each disease (16). According to the definition of marriage, first cousin was included cousin marriage that is marriage between people with a common grandparent.

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Data were analyzed through a descriptive method via SPSS v22 software (IBM; Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

Out of 5100 patients screened in this study, 392 patients were affected by one of the metabolic disorders and 167 individuals had organic acidemia (Table 1).

Table 1.

Frequency of Organic Acidemia

Percent Number Subtype of organic acidemia
14.8 58 Methylmalonic/propionic acidemia
12.2 48 Other organic acidemia
6.1 24 Holocarboxylase/biotinidase
4.8 19 Glutaricaciduria
4.6 18 Isovalericacidemia
42.5 167 Total

The incidence rate of organic acidemia was 27/100,000 live births (1/3606 live births in Isfahan Province).

Propionic acidemia/methyl malonic acidemia (PA/MMA) were the most prevalent forms of metabolic disorders (1/10,383 live births). Organic acidemia was more prevalent in men (53.8%) than in women (46.2%).

The frequency of consanguinity in patients affected by this disease was 84.7%. The absolute majority of sufferers from these diseases were inpatients (83.9%), while PA/MMA patients were more frequently hospitalized (more than 10 times as frequently according to their medical records). 42.6% cases of organic acidemia demonstrated tailored clinical signs as neonates, whereas clinical manifestations were found in most of the cases between the ages of one month and one year (50.5%). Onset of clinical signs in isovaleric acidemia and PA/MMA occurred most regularly in neonates (83.3%) and in infancy, respectively (65.5%). Furthermore, isovaleric acidemia was much more frequently diagnosed within the neonatal period (33.3%).

Lethargy and tachypnea are the most prevalent symptoms of metabolic disorders. Most patients are affected by acidosis, and one third of them suffered from convulsions and developmental disorders. Hyperammonemia was more frequently found in PA/MMA patients (Figure 1, Table 2).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Frequency of biochemical findings in organic acidemias

Table 2.

Frequency of Clinical Sign and Symptom in Organic Acidemias

Tachypnea Poor Feeding Consciousness Disorder Failure of Growth Lethargy Cardiac
Problems
Developmental Delay Seizure Liver Dysfunction Subtype Organic Acidemia
43.1 39.6 22.4 27.5 68.9 13.7 50.9 38.2 5.5 Methylmalonic/Propionic Acidemia
50 20.8 14.5 22.9 70.8 14.5 17 38.3 2.1 Other Organic Academia
41.6 33.3 33.3 37.5 58.3 29.1 41.7 29.2 0 Holocarboxylase/ Biotinidase
21 21 15.7 26.3 52.6 15.7 55.6 55.6 11.1 GlutaricAciduria
16.6 27.7 11.1 16.6 72.2 5.5 22.2 11.1 5.6 Isovaleric Academia
39.5 29.9 19.7 26.3 66.4 15.5 30.8 34.4 4.9 Total

A minority of patients (9.7%) were studying in ordinary schools; the remainder were either studying in special schools for children with various disabilities or could not go to school.

A history of infant mortality was found in 12.2% of the families suffering from organic acidemia. Most of these mortalities occurred due to the lack of multiple carboxylase and biotinidase. 22.3% of mothers whose their children were affected by organic acidemia had a history of abortion. The mortality rate was 18.8% in patients with organic acidemia; one third of the population with PA/MAA died. Just about 11% of the infants were given special infant formula.

Discussion

In this study, most of the metabolic disorders belonged to the organic acidemia group; two-thirds of them resulted from consanguinity. Most patients with organic academia were diagnosed before the first year, whereas in another study, half of the cases were diagnosed before the age of 3 yr (16).

In contrast to our study, this disease was rarely diagnosed in Singapore and Brazil. To elaborate, the mean age of diagnosis was during the twenty-third month in Brazilian patients; two-thirds of the patients from Singapore were between the ages of 1 and 13 yr (17, 18).

This variety in the age of diagnosis could be ascribed to epidemiological factors (especially disease prevalence) and clinical manifestations differing in organic acidemia.

Additionally, the ages at which patients are referred for potential diagnosis-and the frequency of timely diagnosis-may also differ according to family awareness of the potential for the disease; some families may be more aware than others of the potential for metabolic disorder in their children.

The incidence of metabolic disorders differs in many parts of the world. In our study, incidence of organic acidemia was 27/100,000 live births. These results were in accordance with similar earlier trials, where organic acidemia was more prevalent in the Middle East; however, it was less prevalent in Canada, Australia, and Italy (15, 19). To elaborate, in Italy, incidence of organic acidemia was 1/21,422 live births when PA/MMA was the most prevalent subgroup (1/61,775 live births) (16). Furthermore, we showed that incidence of organic acidemia was 1/3606 while PA/MMA incidence was 1/10,383 live births. By comparison, the incidence rate of this disease was lower in Italy (13.7%), India (41.6%), Netherlands (41.6 %), Singapore (32.3%), and Saudi Arabia (20%) and higher in China (50%) (16, 18, 20-22). Our study showed that PA/MMA were the most prevalent forms of organic acidemia, which is in accordance with analogous studies conducted in China and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Egypt (19, 22-25). For example, incidence rate of PA/MMA in Saudi Arabia and Karachi (Pakistan) was 29% and 62%, respectively (19, 26). Importantly, high incidence rates of organic acidemia (42%) as well as PA/MAA (23.5%) were previously proven in Shiraz, Iran (27). The possibility of metabolic diseases significantly increases when the patient shows severe clinical symptoms due to the common associated microbial infections. The patient may suffer from lack of appropriate responses to the treatment strategies. Fortunately, early diagnosis and treatment of metabolic disorders can significantly improve the disease prognosis (28); thus, developed countries are implementing selective screening that aims to detect special metabolic disorders (27). On the other hand, many of the metabolic diseases are more dangerous because they cannot be efficiently diagnosed due to the lack of patient referral to the pediatric metabolic department or to the absence of appropriate screening strategies.

Each of the metabolic diseases, as a separate entity, is rare; nevertheless, their overall prevalence is considerable. Genotypes of these diseases generally are autosomal recessive. However, a history of sudden deaths in the family and consanguinity can be addressed as diagnostic keys for metabolic disorders. Metabolic diseases are more likely to occur when two recessive alleles of autosomal gene transfer due to consanguinity.

These data were consecutively shown in previous studies, conducted in Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Brazil and Iran (17, 29-31). For example, the rate of consanguinity marriages rate was as high as 60% in some societies, providing a background for the genetic risk factors of these metabolic diseases (30). In Turkey, Stike et al. ascribed the increase of metabolic disorders to consanguinity (29). In comparison with a previous research conducted in Iran, our study showed a higher frequency of parental consanguinity in PA/MAA patients (31).

The clinical signs attributed to organic acidemia, however, differed in accordance with the designs of different studies and the subgroups of organic acidemia.

We showed that acidosis was found in half of the cases affected by organic acidemia, while one third of these patients had some degree of developmental disorders and convulsion. In Pakistan, respiratory distress and developmental disorder were the most common clinical signs (26). In PA/MAA patients, developmental disorders, convulsion, hyperammonemia, and acidosis were demonstrated in 60%, 15%, and 25% of the cases, respectively (31). In comparison to our study, the rate of growth retardation in the aforementioned study was high (30% to 50%). Recurrent vomiting, lethargy, and respiratory distress were the most prevalent clinical signs of organic acidemia (27). In Mexico, González et al. documented different clinical signs such as vomiting, metabolic acidosis, and loss of consciousness in MAA patients (32). Organic acidemia cases showed neurologic abnormalities, metabolic acidosis, and growth retardation in 65%, 42%, and 14% of cases, respectively (17). In our study, the rate of growth retardation was higher. Nevertheless, Wajner et al. documented a high incidence rate of psychomotor retardation in organic acidemia patients, which was much more compared to our study (17).

Male/female ratio in organic acidemia patients may differ to some extent. For example, the ratios in our study and in the Brazilian study were 1:1, while in studies carried out in Libya and Pakistan the patient populations were primarily composed of men, with male: female ratios varying among the individual studies (17, 24, 33). In particular, men seemed to present to a greater degree with metabolic disorders in Libya and Pakistan.

Our study as well as the study by Wajner et al. documented a low mortality rate (20%). On the contrary, mortality rates from metabolic disorders in France, Thailand, and China were higher (29%, 36%, and 50%, respectively); a higher mortality rate was also documented in Mexico (17, 32, 34). In a study, multiple carboxylase deficiencies had the best outcomes, and all patients treated with biotin recovered with no developmental delay, whereas mental retardation persisted in the patients with PA and MAA despite treatment. All cases with glutaric aciduria had developmental delay (23).

In general, early diagnosis of organic acidemia is essential and can potentially prevent irremediable

disorders. Neonatal screening is crucial since the disease’s outcomes are improved when the disease is diagnosed as close as possible to its onset. Nevertheless, socioeconomic problems impede the delivery of formula specialized for patients with organic acidemia; these patients are more likely to be affected by physical and mental developmental disorders.

Lack of patient availability and cooperation, especially when they could not afford to pay for the paraclinical examinations, was assumed as our limitation.

In conclusion, each of the metabolic diseases, as a separate entity, is rare; nevertheless, they are prevalent when considered as a group. These diseases could result in mental and developmental disorders without quick diagnosis and treatment, imposing costs on families and on society due to frequent inpatient treatments and the need for a specialized formula and (later) diet.

Furthermore, more mutations should be identified in societies affected by consanguinity. However, specialized management should be applied not only to enhance life expectancy, but also to harness tardy signs of metabolic disorders. Additionally, community discussions concerning educational promotion should be sought through these types of dedicated management steps. Further research should also be conducted to determine worthwhile and more-efficient screening methods as well as long-term neurological prognosis.

Acknowledgment

Our profound gratitude and deepest thanks are extended to Dr Karimzadeh, Dr Mahmodian, Dr Hashemi, Dr Yaghini, Dr Saneian, Dr Shirneshan, and Dr Baradaran, who kindly agreed to collaborate on this study in spite of their high workload. The authors’ heartfelt thanks are extended to the research chancellor at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), the National Organization for Civil Registration in Isfahan Province, and statistical experts in health center of IUMS.

Author Contribution:

RN was responsible for study design, collection, and interpretation of clinical data and oversaw all stages of revision and editing. MH contributed in collection of data and reviewed the draft of this article. Other coauthors were involved in data collection and interpretation.

All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Champion MP. An approach to the diagnosis of inherited metabolic disease. Arch Dis Child EducPract Ed. 2010;95:40. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.151183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.DL Marsden. Inborn Errors of Metabolism: Classification and Biochemical AspectsEncyclopedia of Human Nutrition. (Third Edition) 2013. pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang X, Yang L Dr, Tong F Dr, Yang R Dr, Zhao Z Prof. Screening for inborn errors of metabolism in high-risk children: a 3-year pilot study in Zhejiang Province, China. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Feb 24 ;12(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Waisbren SE. Expanded newborn screening: information and resources for the family physician. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Apr 1 ;77(7):987–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Genson HB, Stanton BF. An Approach to Inborn Errors of Metabolism, : Nelson textbook of pediatric. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011. pp. 309–16. Chapter 78. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ayelet Erez, Oleg A Shchelochkov, Sharon E. Plon, Fernando Scaglia, and Brendan Lee. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2011 Apr 8;:402–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Disorders of energy metabolism1-Nyhan WL, Ozand PT. Atlas of Metabolic Diseases. 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall Medical; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fowler B. Genetic defects of folate and cobalamin metabolism. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157(Suppl 2):S60. doi: 10.1007/pl00014306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoffmann GF, Zschocke J. Glutaric aciduria type I: from clinical, biochemical and molecular diversity to successful therapy. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1999;22:381. doi: 10.1023/a:1005543904484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoffmann GF, Gibson KM, Trefz FK, et al. Neurological manifestations of organic acid disorders. Eur J Pediatr. 1994;153:S94. doi: 10.1007/BF02138786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wappner RS. Biochemical diagnosis of genetic diseases. Pediatr Ann. 1993;22:282. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19930501-08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weiner DL. Metabolic emergencies. In: Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, Henretig FM, editors. Textbook of pediatric emergency medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2006. 1193 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lindor NM, Karnes PS. Initial assessment of infants and children with suspected inborn errors of metabolism. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:987. doi: 10.4065/70.10.987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kamboj M. Clinical approach to the diagnoses of inborn errors of metabolism. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55:1113. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.J Golbahar, EA Al-Jishi, DD Altayab, E Carreon, M Bakhiet, H Alkhayyat. Selective newborn screening of inborn error of amino acids, organic acids and fatty acids metabolism in the Kingdom of Bahrain ;Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Volume 110, Issues 1–2, September–October 2013. pp. 98–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carlo Dionisi-Vici, Cristiano Rizzo, Alberto B. Burlina, , Ubaldo Caruso, Gaetano Sabetta , Graziella Uziel, Damiano Abeni, ,Inborn errors of metabolism in the Italian pediatric population: A national retrospective survey , the Italian Metabolic Network Contributing Investigators. J Pediatr. 2002:321–7. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.122394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moacir Wajner ab, Daniella de Moura Coelho a, Rafaela Ingrassia a, Anderson Büker de Oliveira a, Estela Natacha Brandt Busanello a, Kimiyo Raymond c, etal Selective screening for organic acidemias by urine organic acid GC–MS analysis in Brazil: Fifteen-year experience. Clinica Chimica Acta. 400(2009):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.It-Koon Tan, FRCPath , Bani Gajra, Maria SF Lim. Study of Inherited Metabolic Disorders in Singapore – 13 Years Experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35:804–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moammar H, Cheriyan G, Mathew R, Al-Sannaa N. Incidence and patterns of inborn errors of metabolism in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, 1983-2008. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30:271–7. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.65254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nagaraja D, Mamatha SN, De T, Christopher R. Screening for inborn errors of metabolism using automated electrospray tandem mass spectrometry: study in high-risk Indian population. Clinical biochemistry. 2010;43(6):581–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hendriekje Eggink, Anouk Kuiper, Kathryn J Peall. Maria Fiorella Contarino, Annet M Bosch, Bart Post, Deborah A Siva, Marina AJ Tijssen and Tom J de Koning :Rare inborn errors of metabolism with movement disorders: a case study to evaluate the impact upon quality of life and adaptive functioning Eggink et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2014;9:177. doi: 10.1186/s13023-014-0177-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Han LS, Qiu J, Ye WJ, Gao XL, Wang Y, Gu XF. Selective screening for inborn errors of metabolism on clinical patients using tandem mass spectrometry in China: a four-year report. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007;30:507–514. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0543-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xinwen Huang, Lili Yang, Fan Tong, Rulai Yang, Zhengyan Zhao. Screening for inborn errors of metabolism in high-risk children: a 3-year pilot study in Zhejiang Province, China:Huang et al. BMC Pediatrics. 2012;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tarun Choudhuri, Sivajee Sengupta. Inborn Error of Metabolism –An Indian Perspective. Int J Hum Genet 6(1): 89-91. 2006;6(1):89–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Elsobky E, Elsayed SM. Extended metabolic screen in sick neonates and children. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2004;5:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Satwani H, Raza J, Hanai J, Nomachi S. Prevalence of selected disorders of inborn errors of metabolism in suspected cases at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi. JPMA. 2009;59:815–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Narges Pishva, Alie Mirzaee, Zohre Karamizade, Shahnaz Pourarian, Fariba Hemmati, Mostajab Razvi, Forough Saki. Selective Screening of High-risk Iranian Patients for the Detection of Inborn Error of Metabolism 14. Iranian Journal of Neonatology. 2014;5(4) [Google Scholar]
  • 28.A García-Cazorla, NI Wolf, M Serrano, U Moog, B Pérez-Dueñas, P Póo, M Pineda, J Campistol, GF Hoffmann. Mental retardation and inborn errors of metabolism. J Inherit Metab Dis. 32(2009):597–608. doi: 10.1007/s10545-009-0922-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sitke A, Ulrich D, Peter H, Johannes K, Manfred S, Hartmut S. NMR-Based Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism: Initial Results from a Study on Turkish Neonate. JIMD Reports. doi: 10.1007/8904_2014_326. DOI 10.1007/8904_2014_326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Waleed H A, Magdy HB, Mohammed SM, Ibrahim H. Risk factors and birth prevalence of birth defects and inborn errors of metabolism in Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Pan Afr Med J. 2011;8:14. doi: 10.4314/pamj.v8i1.71064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Karimzadeh P, Jafari N, Jabbehdari S, Taghdiri MM, Nemati H, Saket S, Alaee MR, Ghofrani M, Tonakebni SH. Methylmalonic Acidemia: Diagnosis and Neuroimaging Findings of This Neurometabolic Disorder (An Iranian Pediatric Case Series) Iran J Child Neurol. 2013;7(3):63–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ibarra GI, Fernández LC, Reyes GD, Belmont M L, Guillén LS, Monroy SS et al. Inborn Errors of Intermediary Metabolism in Critically Ill Mexican Newborns. J Inborn Errors Metabol Screening. 2014:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hanna AO. Patterns of inborn errors of metabolism: A 12-year single-center hospital-based study in Libya. Qatar Med J. 2013;(2):57–65. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2013.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tu W, He J, Dai F, Wang X, Li Y. Impact of inborn errors of metabolism on admission in a neonatal intensive care unit--a prospective cohort study. Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Apr;79(4):494–500. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0464-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Child Neurology are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES