Abstract
AIM
To map Usher phenotype in a consanguineous Pakistani family and identify disease-associated mutation in a causative gene to establish phenotype-genotype correlation.
METHODS
A consanguineous Pakistani family in which Usher phenotype was segregating as an autosomal recessive trait was ascertained. On the basis of results of clinical investigations of affected members of this family disease was diagnosed as Usher syndrome (USH). To identify the locus responsible for the Usher phenotype in this family, genomic DNA from blood sample of each individual was genotyped using microsatellite Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers for the known Usher syndrome loci. Then direct sequencing was performed to find out disease associated mutations in the candidate gene.
RESULTS
By genetic linkage analysis, the USH phenotype of this family was mapped to PCDH15 locus on chromosome 10q21.1. Three different point mutations in exon 11 of PCDH15 were identified and one of them, c.1304A>C was found to be segregating with the disease phenotype in Pakistani family with Usher phenotype. This, c.1304A>C transversion mutation predicts an amino-acid substitution of aspartic acid with an alanine at residue number 435 (p.D435A) of its protein product. Moreover, in silico analysis revealed conservation of aspartic acid at position 435 and predicated this change as pathogenic.
CONCLUSION
The identification of c.1304A>C pathogenic mutation in PCDH15 gene and its association with Usher syndrome in a consanguineous Pakistani family is the first example of a missense mutation of PCDH15 causing USH1 phenotype. In previous reports, it was hypothesized that severe mutations such as truncated protein of PCDH15 led to the Usher I phenotype and that missense variants are mainly responsible for non-syndromic hearing impairment.
Keywords: deafness and blindness, Usher syndrome, causative gene, missense mutation, Pakistani family
INTRODUCTION
Usher syndrome (USH) is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait and is characterized by a loss of vision due to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and bilateral sensorineural deafness[1]–[3]. USH represents the most common genetic cause of deafness and blindness among children. Affected children are born deaf and progressively develop pigmentary retinopathy leading to blindness[4].
USH is classified into three clinical subtypes, designated as types I, type II, and type III. These types are distinguished by their severity and the age of onset of the disease[5]. USH type I (USH1) is the most severe and is characterized by severe to profound congenital hearing impairment, vestibular dysfunction, and pre-pubertal onset of RP; type II (USH2) is the most frequent form and is characterized by moderate to severe hearing impairment, normal vestibular function, and teenage onset of RP. USH type III (USH3) presents with progressive hearing loss and variable onset of RP and vestibular function[6].
USH1 is an autosomal recessive disorder and its genetic heterogeneity is well established as different mutant genes, causing USH, have been identified. To date, seven different loci USH1B (11q13.5), USH1C (11p15.1), USH1D (10q21-q22), USH1E (21q21), USH1F (10q21-q22), USH1G (17q24-q25), and USH1H (15q22-q23) have been reported to cause USH1. Genes at five of these loci, MYO7A (USH1B), USH1C (USH1C), CDH23 (USH1D), PCDH15 (USH1F), and USH1G (USH1G) have been identified[7]. Mutations of four USH1 genes MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, and PCDH15 are also reported to cause nonsydromic deafness, DFNB2, DFNB18, DFNB12 and DFNB23, respectively[8]–[9].
In this study, the USH1F locus on chromosome 10q21.1 was mapped by genetics linkage analysis in a consanguineous family with Usher phenotype from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. This region of chromosome 10 harbors PCDH15 gene. It was reported previously that protein truncating mutations of PCDH15 cause USH1F and missense mutation of PCDH15 were associated with isolated deafness (DFNB23) only[10]. On sequencing of PCDH15 gene, we identified three sequence variants in exon 11 of PCDH15 gene. One of the sequence variant, c.1304A>C was observed to be segregating with the disease trait and was not present in ethnically matched controls. This pathogenic c.1304A>C mutation predicts the substitution of an amino acid residue aspartic acid to alanine at codon 435 (p.435D>A). The association of a substitution mutation of PCDH15 to USH trait in a Pakistani family is the first report of an association of substitution mutation with the USH trait.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample Collection and Genomic DNA Isolation
This study was approved by Advance Studies and Research Board, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan and Institute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering, Islamabad, Pakistan. We studied an autosomal recessive consanguineous three generation family with USH. This family was collected from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan, where cousin marriages are commonly practiced. On the basis of clinical history and the results of ophthalmologic, audiometric, and vestibular tests, disease was diagnosed as USH. The clinical information of the affected individuals is presented in Table 1. Blood samples from affected individuals, their parents and clinically normal siblings of the family members were collected with informed consent. Blood samples were also collected from 100 ethnically matched unrelated normal Pakistani individuals and were used as controls for allele frequencies and confirmation of disease associated mutation. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood by the standard phenol chloroform extraction procedure [11].
Table 1. A summary of clinical findings of affected individuals with USH.
| Pedigree code | Age (a) | Clinical findings |
||
| Hearing loss | Vestibular balance | Blindness | ||
| USHR506 | 15 | Congenital, bilateral and profound | Disturb | Profound |
| USHR507 | 13 | Congenital, bilateral and profound | Disturb | Profound |
| USHR508 | 11 | Congenital, bilateral and profound | Disturb | Progressive |
| USHR512 | 10 | Congenital, bilateral and profound | Disturb | Progressive |
Microsatellite and Linkage Analysis
To identify the locus responsible for the disease in this family, genomic DNA from each individual was genotyped using microsatellite Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers for the known USH loci (Table 2). Each STR marker was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR reactions were performed in a 10 μL volume, each containing 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.6 μmol/L of each primer, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase and PCR buffer [16 mmol/L (NH4) 2SO4, 67 mmol/LTris-HCI (pH 8.8), and 0.01% of the nonionic detergent Tween-20] (Bio-line, London, UK). Amplification was performed with an initial denaturation for 4min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45s, annealing at 55°C for 45s, extension at 72°C for 45s and a final extension at 72°C for 5min. The PCR products were separated on 10% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels (Protogel; National Diagnostics, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under ultraviolet (UV) illumination. Alleles were assigned to individuals and genotypic data was used to calculate the LOD scores using the Cyrillic and MLINK software programme (Version 5.2, ftp://linkage.rockefeller.edu/software/linkage/).
Table 2. Known USH loci and genetic markers used in this study.
| Locus I.D. | Chromosomal region | Gene | STR markers used for exclusion studies |
| USH2A | 1q41 | Usherin | D1S2141, D1S549 |
| USH1F | 10q21.1 | PCDH15 | D10S1220, D10S1225, D10S1221, D10S1208, GATA121A08 |
| USH1C | 11q15.1 | Harmonin | D11S1981, ATA34E08 |
| USH1B | 11q13.5 | Myosin 1B | D11S2371, D11S2002, D11S2000 |
| USH1G | 17q24-q25 | Scaffold protein | ATA43A10, D17S784, D17S949 |
Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification of Genomic DNA and Mutation Screening by Direct DNA Sequencing
PCR amplification of the PCDH15 gene was performed with primers spanning all 35 exons[12]–[13]. PCR amplification was performed in a 50 µL reaction volume containing 250 ng of genomic DNA, amplification buffer containing 600 nmol/L of each primer, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 200 mmol/L of dNTPs and 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) in an PxE thermal cycler (Hybaid, Basingstoke, UK). The amplification conditions were 95°C for 5min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 45s, primer specific annealing temperature (55°C -65°C) for 45s, 72°C for 45s. Aliquots (5 µL) of the PCR products were analyzed by 2.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were then purified using GeneJet™ PCR purification kit (Fermentas Life Sciences, Hanover, MD, USA) and sequenced directly using Big Dye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit in an ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Potential mutations were confirmed by bi-directional sequencing and assessing 100 control samples having ethnic backgrounds matching to patients.
In silico Analysis of the PCDH15 Sequencing Variants
To find the influence of mutations identified in the PCDH15 on its protein structure that may have an important role in disease susceptibility, in silico analysis was performed. Each DNA sequence was blasted using nucleotide blast (Blastn) tools of NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&BLAST). The DNA sequences were further aligned and analyzed to predict the effect of mutation on the protein product with CLC workbench 6. The mutations identified in PCDH15 were evaluated using online available programs to predict whether variants are deleterious. PolyPhen classifies an amino acid substitution as probably damaging, possibly damaging, benign, or unknown. Provean predicts whether an amino acid substitution affects protein function. Provean prediction tool was used, which is based on the degree of conservation of amino acid residues in sequence alignments derived from closely related sequences, collected through PSI-BLAST.
RESULTS
An evidence of linkage and the region of homozygosity for STR markers at USH1F locus on chromosome 10q21.1 were observed for USH phenotype in a consanguineous Pakistani family (Figure 1). On mutation screening of the candidate gene, PCDH15 in this region, three sequence variants c.1138G>A, c.1263T>C and c.1304A>C in exon 11 were identified (Table 3). However, among the three identified mutations, a c.1304A>C mutation was found to be disease causative as it was segregating with the disease phenotype and was also not present in 100 ethnically matched controls. This c.1304A>C mutation predicts the substitution of an amino acid residue aspartic acid to alanine at codon 435 (p.435D>A).
Figure 1. Pedigree of a consanguineous Pakistani family with STR genotyping data mapped to a locus on chromosome 10q21.1.
A: In pedigree individual identification numbers are listed below the pedigree symbols. Genotyped markers from the chromosome 10q21.1 region are shown to the left, and individuals' allele numbers for each marker are given next to the bar. Black bars represent the haplotype segregating with the PCDH15 gene. B: Electropherograms of PCDH15 exon 11 in a carrier individual C: Electropherograms of PCDH15 exon 11 in an affected patient; DNA sequence analysis revealed a homozygous A to C substitution at nucleotide 1304 (from the translation start site) in the affected patient, causing the Asp435Ala mutation.
Table 3. Mutations identified in exon 11 of PCDH15 gene.
| Gene name | Accession number | Variant nomenclature (coding) | Exon number | Protein change | Classification |
| PCDH15 | NM_033056 | c.1138G>A | 11 | p.380Gly>Ser | Polymorphism |
| c.1263T>C | 11 | p.421Thr>Thr | Polymorphism | ||
| c.1304A>C | 11 | p.435Asp>Ala | Pathogenic |
The multiple sequence alignment of amino acids showed that aspartic acid at position 435 is phylogenetically conserved in different species, and PolyPhen predicted the mutation to be possibly damaging (Figure 2). These results suggest that aspartic acid may be functionally important and the mutation may lead to damaging interference with conformation and function of PCDH15. Provean prediction analysis results for p.435D>A yield a score of 3.084 and predicted this change as deleterious. Whereas the other PCDH15 variations, p.380G>S and p.421T>T were predicted to be neutral with Provean score of 1.860 and 0.000 respectively (Table 4).
Figure 2. In silico analysis of the PCDH15 sequencing variants.
A: The mutant and normal PCDH15 protein sequences were aligned using CLC Workbench V.6 to find the difference between them. The mutant amino acid residues, p.380Gly>Ser, p.421Thr>Thr and p.435Asp>Ala are indicated by red arrows; B: In order to check the phylogenetic conservation analysis of the mutated amino acid residue, amino acid sequences of PCDH15 from human and different species were downloaded from the NCBI and automatically aligned by Lasergene Meg Align (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). Multiple sequence alignment indicates that asparagine (D) at position 435 (red bar) is highly conserved; C: This diagram showing the PolyPhen analysis results of p.435D>A mutation. The results of PolyPhen analysis classified p.435D>A mutation as possibly damaging with a score of 0.949.
Table 4. In silico analysis of mutations identified in exon 11 of PCDH15 gene.
| Gene | Nucleotide change | Residual change | Location | PolyPhen |
SIFT |
PMut |
|||
| Prediction | PSIC score | Prediction | Score | Prediction | RI | ||||
| PCDH15 | c.1138G>A | p.380G>S | Exon 11 | Benign | 1.860 | Tolerated | 0.93 | Neutral | 5 |
| c.1263T>C | p.421T>T | Exon 11 | Silent | 0.000 | Tolerated | NA | Neutral | NA | |
| c.1304A>C | p.435D>A | Exon 11 | Possibly damaging | 0.949 | Tolerated | 0.07 | Pathogenic | 0 | |
DISCUSSION
USH1 genetic subtypes cannot be differentiated on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms, only investigations of linkage analysis in linkage informative consanguineous families[8] or mutational analysis of the genes involved, have been considered useful. Roux et al[14] investigated a cohort of patients in France and reported that mutations in USH1 genes cause USH in more than 90% of patients. However in some ethnic groups, a few mutations have a significant carrier frequency. As an example, a mutation c.216G>A in USH1C gene was reported in French Canadians of Acadian origin that accounted for almost all USH1 cases in Acadian population[15], but this mutation has not been found in any other population. In another example, the mutation c.733C>T in the PCDH15 gene was identified by Ben-Yosef et al[16], that accounted for 58% of families of Ashkenazi with USH1. In some USH genes mutations were not found in some sporadic and familial cases of USH from Pakistan, France and Spain, suggested the search for additional novel USH genes[8],[14],[17].
The PCDH15 gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. The PCDH15 gene has been mapped by Alagramam et al[18] to chromosome 10q21-q22b. Ahmed et al[12] identified 33 exons in the PCDH15 gene and spans about 1.6 Mb of human genomic DNA. Ahmed et al[13] identified four additional exons in the PCDH15 gene, which encode two other cytoplasmic domains. In a Pakistani family, the first 2 exons of the PCDH15 gene were found critical defined regions to cause USH type IF. Within the promoter region of the PCDH15 gene instead of TATAA or CAAT sequences, a CpG island, suppressor and enhancer elements have been identified by Alagramam et al[19]. The intron sizes in PCDH15 are variable and three additional genes have been reported by Ahmed et al[13]. Within the PCDH15 gene, large genomic rearrangements have been found that are a significant cause of USH1F syndrome[20].
Mutations in the PCDH15 gene are responsible for both combined hearing and vision impairment (USH1F) and non-syndromic deafness (DFNB23). To date, more than 30 different point mutations have been identified as well as large rearrangements, including deletions and duplications have also been reported.
In previous reports, the only protein truncating mutations in PCDH15 were found associated with USH, and other substitutions were reported to be responsible for causing DFNB23 phenotype. Ahmed et al[12] in a consanguineous Pakistani family with USH1F, investigated the PCHD15 gene for mutations in affected members and found a homozygous 1940C-G transversion that resulted in a ser647-to-ter (S647X) substitution and predicted to truncate the protein in the EC6 domain. Doucette et al[21] reported a novel homozygous 1583T-A transversion that resulted an amino-acid substitution of a valine with an aspartic acid at codon 528 (p.V528D) of PCDH15 in a consanguineous family from the island of Newfoundland. Ouyang et al[22] reported the heterozygosity for a mutation of 3-bp deletion (5601-5603delAAC) in exon 33 of PCDH15 gene as this resulted in subsequent deletion of threonine at 1867 and this also caused a missense mutation in patient with USH1F at PCDH15 locus. Rebibo-Sabbah et al[23] reported nonsense mutations in patients with USH1F subsequently in translation of a variable length protein that resulted from partial read-through of this nonsense mutations. Zheng et al[24] also reported patients of USH1 who carried mutations of a 1-bp deletion in the PCDH15 gene (16delT) in compound heterozygosity with a mutation in the CDH23 gene. The PCDH15 deletion (16delT) mutation causes a frameshift leading to an altered amino acid sequence from codon 6, followed by a premature termination at codon 11 in the predicted signal peptide of the protein.
In a study, the mutation c.1304A>C (p.435D>A) identified in the PCDH15 gene by Jaijo et al[17] in a random unrelated pool of samples and was presumed to be non-pathogenic alteration. However the change is clearly disease associated in our family (Figure 1). In silico analysis also supports our findings that the change is pathogenic and conserved in different species (Figure 2 and Table 4), which is contrary to the report published by Jaijo et al[17].
The mutation identified in this study occurs in a highly conserved extracellular cadherin (EC1) domain of PCDH15 and is predicted to be more deleterious than the previously identified missense mutations (p.R134G and p.G262D). Physical assessment, vestibular and visual function testing in deaf adults ruled out syndromic deafness because of USH. This study validates the DFNB23 designation and supports the hypothesis that missense mutations in conserved motifs of PCDH15 cause nonsyndromic hearing loss. This emerging genotype-phenotype correlation in USH1F is similar to that in several other USH1 genes and cautions against a prognosis of a dual sensory loss in deaf children found to be homozygous for hypomorphic mutations at the USH1F locus.
The identification of a missense substitution mutation and establishing its association with USH1F phenotype in a consanguineous Pakistani family is the first example of an association of any missense mutation with USH1F. In exon 11 of PCDH15 gene, a frameshift mutation, c.1304_1305insC (p.T436YfsX12) causing recessive USH1F was also reported by Ahmed and his colleagues[12]. It indicated that the mutations of PCDH15, affecting EC1 domain of its protein product is responsible for causing severe phenotype, i.e. USH1F. Recently, a novel transversion pathogenic mutation for nonsyndromic deafness in the USH1F gene PCDH15 in a consanguineous family has been reported from the island of Newfoundland[21]. The association of a missense mutation and evaluation of its pathogenicity in a Pakistani consanguineous family further support the previous studies and emphasizes the need to know the genetic basis of recessively inherited neurological diseases in Pakistan. As a consequence of the unique socio-cultural practices in the population of Pakistan, approximately 60% of marriages are consanguineous, of which more than 80% are between first cousins[25]. Recessively inherited diseases are more prevalent in population of Pakistan as cousin marriages are common. These large consanguineous families are a powerful resource for genetic linkage studies of recessively neurological inherited disorders. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa there are several factors contribute to the wide prevalence of genetic disorders in the region including the high rate of consanguinity, social trend to have more children until menopause, selective factors favoring inherited disease, and the lack of public awareness towards the early recognition and prevention of inherited disease. Different tribes of Pashtoons living here are very intimate about their marriages of inter tribal partners resulting in the mixing of blood and thus impurification of tribes. Many people do not agree with medical explanations of a genetic mode of disease inheritance, even in cases where there is an affected child. Complex neurological disorders like USH are frequent in the population of Pakistan and particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa due to consanguinity and have a substantial impact on health care, socio-economic level and quality of life. Finding genetic risk factors involved in these disorders may boost knowledge about the disorder and possible treatment therefore provide a strong background for convincing or changing the Pakistani public's view regarding cousin marriages.
In conclusion, the evaluation of pathogenic role of mutation identified in exon 11 of PCDH15 gene and its association with USH phenotype in a consanguineous Pakistani family will enable us to further characterize PCDH15 gene variations and establish genotype/phenotype correlation. It will also help us to understand genetic mechanism of disease progression. A better understanding of PCDH15 mutations and their effect on protein product and the resulting outcome that how some mutations results into less severe phenotype (DFNB23) or more severe phenotype (USH1). This knowledge will also be helpful in developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and also help in reducing the burden of genetic diseases by extending genetic counseling to individuals having strong history of genetic disease/disorders.
Acknowledgments
The authors of the article would like to thank the patients and their family members for their help and participation in this study. We are also grateful to our other colleagues at IBGE for their technical assistance.
Saleha S performed experimental work and paper writing, Ajmal M participated in experimental work, Nasir M and Jamil M helped in paper writing and formatting, Hameed A designed, analyzed data and proof read the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Foundation: Supported by the Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, Pakistan and Institute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Conflicts of Interest: Saleha S, None; Ajmal M, None; Jamil M, None; Nasir M, None; Hameed A, None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bonnet C, El-Amraoui A. Usher syndrome (sensorineural deafness and retinitis pigmentosa): pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25(1):42–49. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834ef8b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mathur P, Yang J. Usher syndrome: Hearing loss, retinal degeneration and associated abnormalities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(3):406–420. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Friedman TB, Schultz JM, Ahmed ZM, Tsilou ET, Brewer CC. Usher syndrome: hearing loss with vision loss. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;70:56–65. doi: 10.1159/000322473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kilpinen H, Dermitzakis ET. Genetic and epigenetic contribution to complex traits. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(R1):R24–28. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Riahi Z, Bonnet C, Zainine R, Lahbib S, Bouyacoub Y, Bechraoui R, Marrakchi J, Hardelin JP, Louha M, Largueche L, Ben Yahia S, Kheirallah M, Elmatri L, Besbes G, Abdelhak S, Petit C. Whole exome sequencing identifies mutations in Usher syndrome genes in profoundly deaf tunisian patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yan D, Liu XZ. Genetics and pathological mechanisms of Usher syndrome. J Hum Genet. 2010;55(6):327–335. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2010.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ayuso C, Millan JM. Retinitis pigmentosa and allied conditions today: a paradigm of translational research. Genome Med. 2010;2(5):34. doi: 10.1186/gm155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Riazuddin S, Belyantseva IA, Giese AP, et al. Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48. Nat Genet. 2012;44(11):1265–1271. doi: 10.1038/ng.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Millan JM, Aller E, Jaijo T, Blanco-Kelly F, Gimenez-Pardo A, Ayuso C. An update on the genetics of usher syndrome. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:417217. doi: 10.1155/2011/417217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Khan SN, Friedman PL, Riazuddin S, Friedman TB. USH1H, a novel locus for type I Usher syndrome, maps to chromosome 15q22-23. Clin Genet. 2009;75(1):86–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01038.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Bernstein SL, Ahmed Z, Khan S, Griffith AJ, Morell RJ, Friedman TB, Riazuddin S, Wilcox ER. Mutations of the protocadherin gene PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(1):25–34. doi: 10.1086/321277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Aye S, Ali RA, Venselaar H, Anwar S, Belyantseva PP, Qasim M, Riazuddin S, Friedman TB. Gene structure and mutant alleles of PCDH15: nonsyndromic deafness DFNB23 and type 1 Usher syndrome. Hum Genet. 2008;124(3):215–223. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0543-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Roux AF, Faugere V, Vache C, et al. Four-year follow-up of diagnostic service in USH1 patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4063–4071. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ebermann I, Lopez I, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Brown C, Koenekoop RK, Bolz HJ. Deafblindness in French Canadians from Quebec: a predominant founder mutation in the USH1C gene provides the first genetic link with the Acadian population. Genome Biol. 2007;8(4):R47. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ben-Yosef T, Ness SL, Madeo AC, Bar-Lev A, Wolfman JH, Ahmed ZM, Desnick RJ, Willner JP, Avraham KB, Ostrer H, Oddoux C, Griffith AJ, Friedman TB. A mutation of PCDH15 among Ashkenazi Jews with the type 1 Usher syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1664–1670. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jaijo T, Oshima A, Aller E, Carney C, Usami S, Millán JM, Kimberling WJ. Mutation screening of the PCDH15 gene in Spanish patients with Usher syndrome type I. Mol Vis. 2012;18:1719–1726. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alagramam KN, Murcia CL, Kwon HY, Pawlowski KS, Wright CG, Woychik RP. The mouse Ames waltzer hearing-loss mutant is caused by mutation of PCDH15, a novel protocadherin gene. Nat Genet. 2001;27(1):99–102. doi: 10.1038/83837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Alagramam KN, Miller ND, Adappa ND, Pitts DR, Heaphy JC, Yuan H, Smith RJ. Promoter alternative splice forms, and genomic structure of protocadherin 15. Genomics. 2007;90(4):482–492. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Le Guédard S, Faugère V, Malcolm S, Claustres M, Roux AF. Large genomic rearrangements within the PCDH15 gene are a significant cause of USH1F syndrome. Mol Vis. 2007;13:102–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Doucette L, Merner ND, Cooke S, Ives E, Galutira D, Walsh V, Walsh T, MacLaren L, Cater T, Fernandez B, Green JS, Wilcox ER, Shotland LI, Li XC, Lee M, King MC, Young TL. Profound, prelingual nonsyndromic deafness maps to chromosome 10q21 and is caused by a novel missense mutation in the Usher syndrome type IF gene PCDH15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17(5):554–564. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ouyang XM, Yan D, Du LL, Hejtmancik JF, Jacobson SG, Nance WE, Li AR, Angeli S, Kaiser M, Newton V, Brown SD, Balkany T, Liu XZ. Characterization of Usher syndrome type I gene mutations in an Usher syndrome patient population. Hum Genet. 2005;116(4):292–299. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rebibo-Sabbah A, Nudelman I, Ahmed ZM, Baasov T, Ben-Yosef T. In vitro and ex vivo suppression by aminoglycosides of PCDH15 nonsense mutations underlying type 1 Usher syndrome. Hum Genet. 2007;122(3–4):373–381. doi: 10.1007/s00439-007-0410-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zheng QY, Yan D, Ouyang XM, Du LL, Yu H, Chang B, Johnson KR, Liu XZ. Digenic inheritance of deafness caused by mutations in genes encoding cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 in mice and humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(1):103–111. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Perveen F, Rehman S. Consanguineous marriages and their malformation in F1 Generation. Asia J Pharma Health Sci. 2012;2(3):406–411. [Google Scholar]


