Differential co-expression analysis of venous thromboembolism based on gene expression profile data

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to screen differentially co-expressed genes and the involved transcription factors (TFs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in venous thromboembolism (VTE). Microarray data of GSE19151 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus, including 70 patients with VTE and 63 healthy controls. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using R software. Differential co-expression analysis was performed using R, followed by screening of modules using Cytoscape. Functional annotation was performed using Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Moreover, Fisher test was used to screen key TFs and miRNAs for the modules. PCA revealed the disease and healthy samples could not be distinguished at the gene expression level. A total of 4,796 upregulated differentially co-expressed genes (e.g. zinc finger protein 264, electron-transfer-flavoprotein, beta polypeptide and Janus kinase 2) and 3,629 downregulated differentially co-expressed genes (e.g. adenylate cyclase 7 and single-stranded DNA binding protein 2) were identified, which were further mined to obtain 17 and eight modules separately. Functional annotation revealed that the largest upregulated module was primarily associated with acetylation and the largest downregulated module was mainly involved in mitochondrion. Moreover, 48 TFs and 62 miRNA families were screened for the 17 upregulated modules, such as E2F transcription factor 4, miR-30 and miR-135 regulating the largest module. Conversely, 35 TFs and 18 miRNA families were identified for the 8 downregulated modules, including mitochondrial ribosomal protein S12 and miR-23 regulating the largest module. Differentially co-expressed genes regulated by TFs and miRNAs may jointly contribute to the abnormal acetylation and mitochondrion presentation in the progression of VTE.

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is defined as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or both, which affects an estimated 300,000–600,000 individuals in the U.S. each year (1). A population-based case-control study revealed that the 2-year cumulative incidence of VTE is between 0.8 and 8% (2). Recurrent VTE accounts for as many as 30% of patients after stopping a standard course of anticoagulant therapy (3). Cancer patients have seven-fold risk of developing VTE compared with patients without cancer (4). Inherited and acquired risk factors could increase individual's risk for developing VTE (5). The investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying VTE could provide novel intervention methods for VTE.

Gene microarray is a powerful and cost-effective tool for large-scale analysis of gene expression features in disease (6). By using this tool, T cell-mediated immunity dysfunction has been reported to play an important role in the progression of VTE (7). The genes associated with immune cells, such as CD3, CD4 and CD8, exhibit dysregulation in VTE (8). Additionally, gene expression data of whole blood indicate the involvement of insulin-like growth-factor-1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor PPAR-δ in platelet aggregation in VTE (9). However, genes and their products cannot perform their functions in isolation, but are coordinate (10), and the dynamic switch of a gene from one community to another implies altered gene function (11). Thus, differential co-expression analysis could help to reveal molecular mechanisms of phenotypic changes through identifying subtle changes in gene expression coordination (12–14). Moreover, transcription factors, such as Kruppel-like factor 2, are involved in the pathogenesis of arterial thrombosis through exerting regulatory effect on gene expression (15). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are also important for the development of thrombosis via regulating target genes (16). However, studies of transcription factors and miRNAs in VTE remain rare (17,18). The identification of the transcription factors and miRNAs involved in VTE may help to elucidate the gene expression alterations and provide novel therapeutic targets for VTE.

In the present study, based on the published gene expression profile data (GSE19151) of 70 VTE samples and 63 normal samples (9), the differentially co-expressed gene pairs in VTE samples were screened, followed by construction of densely connected network modules. Furthermore, functional analysis of modules was performed to reveal the underlying molecular mechanisms. Additionally, the key transcription factors and miRNAs of modules were screened to clarify the regulatory network of co-expressed genes in VTE.

Materials and methods

Data source and preprocessing

Gene expression profile data of GSE19151 (9) on platform GPL571 [HG-U133A_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133A 2.0 Array were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) online database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/). These data included 70 blood samples from adult patients with VTE receiving warfarin and 63 blood samples from healthy controls. The raw expression profile data at the probe level were converted into the corresponding gene expression data based on the platform, followed by medium normalization using the preprocess Core package, version 1.28.0 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.0/bioc/html/preprocessCore.html). As a single gene may correspond to multiple probes, the expression level of the gene was calculated by taking the average of multiple probe expression values.

Principal component analysis (PCA)

PCA was performed to analyze the association between the gene expression profile and VTE using the plot PCA function provided by R software (http://www.bioconductor.org/). PCA is a multi-statistical analysis for detecting the correlation among multiple variables based on their variance, and is usually applied to identify the dominant PCA components from primary variables (19). Generally, the size of variance represents the information contained in the variable. The F1 with the largest variance in all linear combinations was considered to be the dominant PCA component. If the F1 could not include all the information of the variables, then F2 with the second largest variance was selected as the second PCA component. The information in F1 was not included in F2. Specifically, if Cover (F1, F2)=0, F2 was defined as the second dominant PCA component, and so on.

Identification of differentially co-expressed associations

The differential co-expression analysis was performed to investigate the differentially expressed gene interconnection at the expression level from a global perspective using the Derived Concentration Guidelines Level (DCGL) package in R (20). Briefly, Pearson correlation coefficient of paired genes (u,v) in normal samples and diseased samples were calculated based on the following formula (Formula 1):

$${\mathrm{R}}^{\mathrm{i}}(\mathrm{u},\mathrm{v})=\left|\frac{\text{Covariance}(\text{ui},\text{vi})}{\sqrt{\text{Variance}(\text{ui})}\sqrt{\text{Variance}(\text{vi})}}\right|$$

In Formula 1, ‘ui’ represents the expression level of gene u in i status, and ‘vi’ represents the expression level of gene v in i status (i=1, diseased status; i=2, normal status).

We speculated that if the correlation coefficient of this gene pair in diseased samples obeyed the normal distribution: R¹(u,v)~N(µ₁, δ²₁ (µ, mean value of the random variables; and δ, variance of the random variables) and the correlation coefficient of this gene pair in normal samples obeyed the normal distribution: R¹(u,v)~N(µ₂, δ²₂), then the change of correlation coefficient of these paired genes would also obey the normal distribution: R¹-R²~N(µ₁-µ₂, δ²₁+δ²₂). The differences between R1 and R2 for each gene pair were then treated with normalization and converted into corresponding T values, using the following formula (Formula 2):

$$\mathrm{T}=\frac{({\mathrm{R}}^1–{\mathrm{R}}^2)–({\mu }_1–{\mu }_2)}{\sqrt{{\delta }_1^2+{\delta }_2^2}}$$

In Formula 2, R represents the calculated Pearson correlation coefficient, µ represents the mean value of the random variables and δ represents the variance of the random variables (i=1, disease status; i=2, normal status). Subsequently, the T value for one pair of genes was calculated 100 times to ensure the precision of the T value. Then the results were set as a background to test the significance of T values. Gene pairs with P<0.05 were considered as differentially co-expressed gene pairs, of whose T-value was >0 were defined as an upregulated co-expressed gene pair, and T-value <0 was defined as a downregulated co-expressed gene pair.

Mining the network modules of differentially co-expressed genes

Here, the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) algorithm (21) from the plug-in clusterViz for Cytoscape software (22) was applied to mine the network modules of differentially co-expressed gene pairs. MCODE consisted of three stages: i) Vertex weighting; ii) complex prediction; and iii) an optional post-processing step. Briefly, the clustering coefficient of node i was defined as node weighting (Ci; Formula 3):

$$Ci=\frac{2*n}{Ki}*\left(Ki–1\right)$$

In Formula 3, Ki represented the number of nodes directly connected with node i, and n represented the number of edges among the Ki nodes. The node with highest weighting was set as seed of the module. Then, the node J with weighting ratio (Wj/Wseed) more than the threshold was selected and added into the module. Meanwhile, the weighting of nodes was rechecked and when no node meets the threshold, the module was successfully screened. The checked node was deleted from the network, so each node was not checked more than once. In addition, functional annotation analysis for genes in differentially co-expressed modules was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery tool (23).

Selecting co-expressed transcription factors and miRNAs with target genes

To elucidate the potential co-expression associations between transcription factors and their target genes in VTE, an integrated transcription factor platform database was used, which possessed 4,105 putative transcription factors and 69,496 potential transcription factor-target pairs for humans (24). Furthermore, co-expression associations between miRNAs and target genes were downloaded from TargetScan database (http://www.targetscan.org/), which predicted miRNA-target genes basing on the base complementarity within the 3′UTR and the sequence conservativeness of target genes among species (25). Herein, the correlation between target genes of transcription factors and genes in differentially co-expressed network modules were calculated using Fisher's exact test by R software in Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org/). The transcription factors with P<0.01 were screened out and considered to be key transcription factors. Similarly, using Fisher test, the miRNAs with P<0.01 were also screened out and considered to be key miRNAs.

Results

PCA

Following data preprocessing, a total of 13,035 genes were identified. Besides, based on the PCA analysis for gene expression profile data, it was found that the gene expression level in certain diseased samples was similar to that in normal samples, and the two groups were not distinguished absolutely at the gene expression level (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Principal component analysis plot of 63 normal samples and 70 venous thromboembolism samples.

Differentially co-expressed gene pairs

On the basis of the two formulas (1) and (2), a total of 27,913 gene pairs were identified in 4,796 differentially co-expressed genes with upregulation, such as zinc finger protein 264 (ZNF264), electron-transfer-flavoprotein beta polypeptide (ETFB) and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) (Table I). Furthermore, 9,642 gene pairs were identified in 3,629 differentially co-expressed genes with downregulation, such as adenylate cyclase 7 (ADCY7) and single-stranded DNA binding protein 2 (SSBP2) (Table I).

Table I.

Top ten differentially co-expressed gene pairs.

Gene 1	Gene 2	Normal group	Disease group	P-value
Upregulated
ZNF264	IARS2	0.673338	−0.73511	3.89E-04
SEC31B	GHITM	0.701243	−0.70213	1.41E-03
ZNF264	TSPYL1	0.584623	−0.79107	1.62E-03
GHITM	EIF6	0.658365	−0.66949	1.67E-03
ZNF264	NNT	0.527611	−0.78110	2.55E-03
MED4	ETFB	0.602538	−0.69157	2.80E-03
UBE2K	C19orf60	0.520002	−0.77137	3.70E-03
MFF	ETFB	0.601631	−0.68076	3.80E-03
ZNF264	PNMA1	0.539847	−0.73907	6.30E-03
SH3BGRL	SEC31B	0.559038	−0.71832	7.00E-03
Downregulated
ETFB	DUSP11	0.684080	−0.61501	9.32E-05
PLCG1	ADCY7	0.686949	−0.60522	9.62E-05
RAB4A	C12orf44	0.766989	−0.51036	1.00E-04
CHD3	ADCY7	0.654376	−0.61336	1.10E-04
MYL6	IK	0.666814	−0.59576	1.90E-04
C12orf44	BCAS2	0.658958	−0.59733	1.97E-04
ZMIZ1	TRAM1	−0.746020	0.506433	1.97E-04
OAT	C21orf45	0.666831	−0.58034	2.00E-04
UBE2K	ETFB	0.672036	−0.57243	2.10E-04
TANK	PRRC1	0.631341	−0.61247	3.19E-04

Differentially co-expressed gene pairs were ranked based on the P-value.

Modules of differentially co-expressed genes

Using MCODE algorithm in the clusterViz plug-in for Cytoscape, 17 modules were mined in the co-expressed gene pairs with upregulation. The smallest module possessed three genes and three edges (lines; representing an interaction between two genes) while the largest module contained 263 genes and 482 edges (Fig. 2). By contrast, eight modules were mined in the differentially co-expressed gene pairs with downregulation. The smallest module had three genes and three edges while the largest module included 80 genes and 137 edges (Fig. 2). Functional annotation for the largest upregulated module was performed, and revealed that this module was primarily involved in functional term of acetylation (Table II). The functional annotation for the largest downregulated module revealed that it was mainly related to functional term of mitochondrion (Table II).

Figure 2.

Two largest modules of differentially co-expressed genes. (A) Upregulated module and (B) downregulated module.

Table II.

Top five most significantly enriched terms of differentially co-expressed genes in Module 1.

Category	Term	Count	P-value
Upregulated genes
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS	Acetylation	78	8.19E-12
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS	Phosphoprotein	148	1.62E-10
GOTERM_CC_FAT	GO:0031981~nuclear lumen	44	2.18E-07
GOTERM_CC_FAT	GO:0005654~nucleoplasm	32	4.58E-07
GOTERM_CC_FAT	GO:0070013~intracellular organelle lumen	48	1.50E-06
Downregulated genes
GOTERM_CC_FAT	GO:0005739~mitochondrion	20	1.43E-06
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS	Mitochondrion	15	6.54E-06
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS	Transit peptide	11	2.45E-05
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS	Acetylation	26	3.23E-05
GOTERM_CC_FAT	GO:0044429~mitochondrial part	13	4.54E-05

SP, splice patterns; PIR, protein information resource; GO, gene ontology; CC, cellular component.

Key transcription factors and miRNAs for differentially co-expressed modules

Using Fisher's test, 48 transcription factors were screened out for the 17 upregulated modules, such as JAK2 in module 1 regulated by E2F transcription factor 4 (E2F4), and low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) in module 3 regulated by transcription factor F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 19 (FBXL19) (Fig. 3). This suggested that these transcription factors could enhance the co-expression association between co-expressed gene pairs in modules under diseased status. Furthermore, 62 miRNA families were selected for 17 upregulated modules, including miR-30 and miR-135 regulating module 1 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Regulatory networks between key transcription factors or micro (mi)RNAs with differentially co-expressed modules of upregulated genes. Green nodes represent differentially co-expressed modules, and pink nodes represent transcription factors or miRNA families.

Furthermore, 35 transcription factors were identified for the eight downregulated modules, for instance, SSBP2 in module 1 regulated by transcription factor (mitochondrial ribosomal protein S12) MRPS12 (Fig. 4). This implied that these transcription factors could weaken the co-expressed associations between co-expressed gene pairs in modules under diseased status. Additionally, 18 miRNA families were selected for the eight downregulated modules, such as miR-23 targeting module 1.

Figure 4.

Regulatory association between key transcription factors or micro (mi)RNAs with differentially co-expressed modules of downregulated genes. Green nodes represent differentially co-expressed modules, and pink nodes represent transcription factors or miRNA families.

Discussion

By re-analyzing the gene expression profile data of 63 VTE samples and 70 normal samples, this study obtained a total of 27,913 pairs of 4,796 upregulated differentially co-expressed genes and 9,642 pairs of 3,629 downregulated differentially co-expressed genes. Altogether 17 upregulated and eight downregulated modules were screened based on the differentially co-expressed genes. Moreover, large numbers of transcription factors and miRNAs were identified to have a regulatory effect on the differentially co-expressed genes of modules.

Herein, co-expression analysis presented 4,796 upregulated differentially co-expressed genes in VTE, such as ZNF264 and ETFB. ZNF264 is reported to be associated with inflammation (26). ETFB has been identified as a candidate protein that participates in the mechanoregulation of fibroblast cell number in collagen gel culture (27). The upregulation of those differentially co-expressed genes may jointly contribute to abnormal inflammation-induced VTE. In addition, based on the differentially co-expressed genes, 17 modules were screened, among which the largest module was predominantly associated with the functional term of acetylation. A previous study reported that the abnormal acetylation of proteins may contribute to blood coagulation in the development of VTE (28). Thus, the genes involved in this module were speculated to induce abnormal acetylation, such as JAK2, whose mutation may be of help in early myeloproliferative neoplasms detection and clinical management of splanchnic venous thrombosis patients (29). Notably, transcription factor E2F4 was revealed to regulate the largest module. In previous studies, E2F4 has been identified as the most abundant E2F protein in numerous cell types (30) and the other family member E2F1 is related to histone acetylation (31), implying the involvement of E2F4 in acetylation. Furthermore, miR-30 and miR-135 family members were revealed to regulate the largest module. Previously, miR-30c has been shown to directly interact with PAI-1 and is suggested to be a potential biomarker for inflammatory and thrombotic disorders (32). MiR-135 has an important role in promoting portal vein tumor thrombus tumorigenesis (33). Those miRNAs may be involved in the progression of VTE via regulating acetylation. It may be therefore speculated that the upregulated differentially co-expressed genes may jointly contribute to abnormal acetylation in the progression of VTE. Transcription factors (e.g. E2F4) and miRNAs (e.g. miR-30 and miR-135) may contribute to the abnormal upregulation of the co-expressed genes.

In addition, 3,629 downregulated differentially co-expressed genes were revealed in VTE, including ADCY7, which may be the major form of adenylyl cyclase expressed in human platelets and is an important receptor-G protein-coupled effector involved in numerous neuronal functions in the central nervous system (34,35). Herein, on the basis of the downregulated differentially co-expressed genes, a total of eight modules were screened. The largest module was primarily related to the functional term mitochondrion. The activities of electron transport chain-associated enzymes are reduced in estrogen-receptor beta-deficiency mice, and mitochondrial energetic processes of platelets are associated with the production of circulating thrombogenic microvesicles, leading to thromboembolism (36). SSBP2 in the largest module is associated with normal protein C plasma level, which influences the risk of venous thrombosis (37), suggesting the involvement of SSBP2 in VTE. Notably, a number of transcription factors were revealed to exert a regulatory effect on the modules, such as mitochondrial ribosomal protein S12 (MRPS12) targeting the largest module. A previous study indicated that MRPS12 contains an array of four CCAAT boxes, and has been associated with mitochondrial stress (38). Furthermore, numerous miRNAs exert a regulatory effect on the modules. miR-23, targeting the largest module, is reported to be a novel therapeutic target in vascular disorders and ischemic heart disease (39). The transcription factors and miRNAs may be involved in the regulation of mitochondrion in the progression of VTE.

In conclusion, using bioinformatics a number of differentially co-expressed genes have been indicated to jointly contribute to the abnormal acetylation and mitochondrion presentation. Transcription factors (e.g. E2F4 and MRPS12) and miRNAs (e.g. miR-30, miR-135 and miR-23) may contribute to the dysregulation of the co-expressed genes. However, the present results require further validation. We anticipate that this study may provide novel insights into the mechanism and therapeutic targets associated with VTE, and further studies are required to investigate the function of these key transcription factors and miRNAs in VTE.

Glossary

Abbreviations

TFs

transcription factors miRNAs, microRNAs

VTE

venous thromboembolism

PCA

principal component analysis

GEO

gene expression omnibus

NCBI

national center for biotechnology information

MCODE

molecular complex detection

ZNF264

zinc finger protein 264

ETFB

electron-transfer-flavoprotein beta polypeptide

JAK2

janus kinase 2

ADCY7

adenylate cyclase 7

SSBP2

single-stranded DNA binding protein 2

E2F4

E2F transcription factor 4

LRP1

lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1

FBXL19

F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 19