Abstract
Objective
To describe food and nutrient intake for low-income, urban African American children and adolescents to highlight the need for further nutrition intervention programs and appropriate tools to address overweight and obesity.
Methods
This was a cross sectional study using interviewer-administered single 24-hour dietary recalls. Participants were low income African American boys and girls aged 5–16 years or their caregivers in Baltimore City. Frequency of food consumption and dietary intakes were analysed by gender and age groups.
Results
Eighty-one participants were included for analysis. Mean daily energy intakes exceeded Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) from 10 to 71% across all gender-age groups: 2,304 kcal for children aged 5–8 years; 2,429 kcal and 2,732 kcal for boys and girls aged 9–13 years, respectively; and 3,339 kcal and 2,846 kcal for boys and girls aged 14–16 years, respectively. The most frequently reported consumed foods were sweetened drinks, chips, candies, and milk across all age groups. The majority of participants (79–100%) did not meet the DRIs for dietary fiber and vitamin E across all gender-age groups. Milk accounted for 14%, 17%, and 21% of energy, fat, and protein intake, respectively, among children 5–8 years of age, while pizza was the top source of energy, fat, and protein (11%, 13%, and 18%, respectively) among 14–16 year old adolescents. Sweetened drinks and sweetened juices were major sources of sugar, contributing 33% for 5–8 year olds, 29% for 9–13 year olds and 35% for 14–16 year olds.
Conclusions
Mean daily energy intake exceeded dietary recommendations across all gender-age groups. This study has provided previously unavailable information on diet and highlights foods to be targeted in nutrition intervention programs.
Keywords: Dietary assessment, youth food frequency questionnaire, African American, children
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in the United States has increased substantially over the past three decades. Currently, childhood obesity affects 17% of children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years, the highest rate reported in US history1;2. Considerable racial disparities persist among African American and Caucasian children and adolescents, with nearly 39% of African Americans 6 to 19 years of age overweight and more than 20% obese, compared to 33% and 17%, respectively, of Caucasians in the same age group1;3. According to a study by Wang et al., African American adolescents of low socioeconomic status in four Chicago public schools, had rates of overweight above 40%4. Subsequently, African American and minority children and youth, particularly those in low income neighborhoods, are at a higher risk than Caucasian children and youth for diet-related chronic diseases, such as metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes5–8. For the first time in recent history it was predicted that US life expectancy may decline as a result of the increasing prevalence of childhood overweight6.
Concurrent with the increased prevalence of overweight and obesity, American children have inadequate dietary practices, including increased consumption of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods, larger portion sizes9–12, and more meals and snacks prepared away from home as compared to children in China, Russia, and the Philippines13. Soft drink consumption is also increasing among American youth, while intakes of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are below national recommendations14–16. Soda was identified as the top contributor to sugar intake among low-income African American youth in Chicago and an estimated 55% of the study population was consuming both fried foods and soft drinks ≥ 2 times/day17.
Trends seen in poor diet quality are negatively associated with socioeconomic status18. In Baltimore City, previous findings have shown that, predominantly African American and lower-income neighborhoods have lower accessibility to different types of food stores (e.g. supermarkets, convenience stores, and restaurants) and healthy food in comparison to Caucasian and higher-income neighborhoods19. An unbalanced diet, meaning a low intake of dairy products, fruits and vegetables and a high intake of processed food products,18 among low-income urban African American households, is reflected by inadequate intake of fiber, vitamins A and C, and calcium, and an excessive amount of saturated and trans fat, added sugar, and sodium18;20. Among low-income urban African American youth in Baltimore City, chips, candy and soda have been reported to be the most commonly purchased foods21; these foods are more energy-dense and convenient to access compared to fruits and vegetables that may be more expensive and take more time to prepare22. Results from the 1994–1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals suggest that low-income American children, in particular, are not consuming a balanced diet23. This suggests that African American children and youth, living in lower-income neighborhoods, may be especially vulnerable to diets of poor quality and with nutrient inadequacies as a result of these dietary trends and socioeconomic disparities.
Baltimore City, Maryland has a population of approximately 637,000 people with more than 31% under 18 years of age26. Of participants reporting only one racial background, nearly 33% of Baltimore City residents were Caucasian and almost 64% were African American26. Median household income in Baltimore City was below the national average by more than 27% in 2007. Approximately 20% of the population lives below the poverty level compared to the national average of 13%. Among Baltimore City youth, 18.0% have BMIs greater than the 95th percentile compared to 12·5% for all Maryland youth according to the 2005 Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System27. Baltimore African American youth experience a higher rate of obesity (18·0%) than youth of any other ethnic group in the city or state.
Childhood overweight and obesity can be prevented through improved diet quality, thus warranting intervention programs aimed at increasing access to healthy foods and improving food choices28;29. The aims of the present study were to (1) describe food and nutrient intake; (2) compare nutrient intake with Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs); and (3) identify frequently consumed food items to be included for a nutritional intervention program among urban African American boys and girls aged 5–16 years in Baltimore City, Maryland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Settings and subjects
The study was conducted in low-income neighborhoods of Baltimore City, Maryland. Participants were recruited from various locales within Baltimore City, including recreation centers, human services centers, supermarkets, clinics, local food markets, churches, and organizations, in order to acquire a convenience sample that represented diverse community members with respect to gender, and age. Children and adolescents aged 5 to 16 years were invited to participate in an interviewer-administered 24-hour dietary recall. Participants had to have lived in East or West Baltimore communities within one and a half miles of a Baltimore City recreation center. Only one child per household was eligible to enroll.
Sources of data
Twenty-four hour dietary recalls
Dietary recall data were collected from 84 study participants ranging from 5–16 years of age (one recall per participant) following a standard manual of procedures. Primary caregivers were considered as participants for young children (<8 years). Data collectors were trained for 3 days in the collection of 24-hour dietary recalls by the last author. The data collectors administered face-to-face 24-hour recalls and systematically sought and recorded information about foods and drinks consumed during the preceding 24-hour period. Portion sizes were estimated using standard units (e.g. slice of bread), familiar household utensils (e.g. glass, tablespoon), commercial packages of store-bought foods such as snack chips and chocolate bars, and three-dimensional food models (NASCO, Fort Atkinson, WI) selected to represent commonly consumed food items. An additional list of questions were generated to prompt for easily forgotten foods such as sweets and snacks. Questions on special dietary practices (e.g. weight loss diet), food allergies, medical conditions, and supplement use were also included. All data were examined for completeness, and if any data were incomplete, the interviewer was asked to re-contact the respondent to acquire additional information.
Portion weight estimation
All foods reported in the 24-hour dietary recalls were weighed to determine weights, in grams, for food portions estimated using household utensils, commercial food packages, food models, or standard units. All food weights were obtained by trained data collectors using an electronic kitchen scale (Aquatronic Baker’s Dream Scale 2005, Salter Houseware, Ltd., Tonbridge, Kent, UK). Average gram weights, for all the foods reported, were calculated from up to ten measurements for each food item.
Identification of frequently consumed food items and development of a draft Youth Food Frequency Questionnaire (YFFQ)
The frequency of foods reported in the 24-hour dietary recalls was tabulated. Any food or drink item that was consumed by two or more respondents was included in a draft YFFQ with the exception of foods very low in energy and nutrients such as condiments and spices. With assistance from local community members and youth leaders, the ordering of the food list and the selection of food models to assess portion sizes were carefully considered for each food item. Focus group discussions revealed that ready-prepared foods are commonly consumed for most meals and snacks; therefore, food packages such as Styrofoam food containers from local corner stores and carry-out restaurants were obtained to aid participants in estimating portion sizes consumed. To ensure no foods had been omitted, blank lines were added to the draft YFFQ for interviewers to record any additional foods reported.
The draft YFFQ was pilot-tested in a convenience sample of Baltimore children and adolescents representing both genders and a distribution of ages between five and sixteen years. Interviewers were trained for five days on how to administer the instrument, and a manual of procedures was developed and used. To ensure standardization of the data collection, each interviewer practiced using multiple draft YFFQs under the supervision of the last author.
Analysis of dietary intake
Dietary recall data were entered into and analyzed using NutriBase Clinical Nutrition Manager v. 7.17 software (CyberSoft Inc., Phoenix, AZ). USDA food composition tables were used for dietary analyses. All other analyses were performed using SAS statistical software v. 9·1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Mean daily energy and nutrient intakes were calculated for each individual based on the single 24-hour dietary recall. Mean nutrient intakes for each participant were compared to the DRIs according to the gender-age groups. The percentage of participants reporting intakes below the DRIs was calculated for specific nutrients, and was stratified by gender and age. Nutrient intakes were also evaluated against the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDR)30. In addition, the most frequently reported foods were tabulated, and the top ten foods contributing to energy and macronutrient intakes were determined.
RESULTS
A total of 84 participants were recruited for the study. Three participants were excluded from analysis due to extreme energy intake (above or below mean intake ± 2 SDs), creating a final sample size of 81 African American participants (40 boys and 41 girls). Of the total sample population, 30% were 5–8 years of age; 35% were 9–13 years of age; and 36% were 14–16 years of age. About 76.5% of participants reported dietary intake during the weekdays (Monday and Thursday each by 17.3%, Tuesday by 12.3%, Wednesday by 16.0%, and Friday by 13.6%) and 23.4% during the weekend (Saturday by 11.1% and Sunday by 12.3%).
Frequency of consumption
The frequency of consumption of each food item reported in the 24-hour dietary recalls was tabulated for participants in each age group (Table 1). More than 60% of 14–16 year old participants reported consuming chips, sweetened juices, and sodas (66%, 62%, and 62%, respectively). Sweetened drinks, chips, and milk were reported with the highest frequency for both the younger age groups. Sweetened drinks were reported by 71% of children in 5–8 and 9–13 years age groups. Among children in the 5–8 years age group, milk was reported by 92% of respondents, compared to the older age groups for whom milk was reported by 64% of 9–13 year old and 48% of 14–16 year old respondents. Candy was also among the top foods most frequently reported across all age groups, ranging from 50% to 64% of respondents in each age group.
Table 1.
5–8 ya n=24 |
9–13 ya n=28 |
14–16 ya n=29 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food | # of times reported (% of respondents) |
Food | # of times reported (% of respondents) |
Food | # of times reported (% of respondents) |
Milk | 32 (92) | Sweetened drinks | 28 (71) | Chips | 29 (66) |
Chips | 23 (75) | Milk | 28 (64) | Sweetened juices | 25 (62) |
Sweetened drinks | 23 (71) | Candies | 27 (64) | Sodas | 23 (62) |
Sweetened juices | 22 (63) | Chips | 30 (57) | Candies | 26 (59) |
Cereal | 16 (58) | Sodas | 23 (54) | Pizza | 17 (55) |
Chicken dishes | 18 (54) | Sweetened juices | 21 (54) | Sweetened drinks | 25 (52) |
Vegetables | 18 (54) | Rice & pasta dishes | 18 (54) | Bread | 17 (48) |
Bread | 15 (54) | Sandwiches & burgers | 15 (46) | Milk | 16 (48) |
Candies | 17 (50) | Chicken dishes | 14 (46) | Fried potatoes | 13 (41) |
Sandwiches & burgers | 14 (50) | Fried potatoes | 12 (43) | Sandwiches & burgers | 17 (38) |
The most frequently reported foods are presented in this table by Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) life stage age groups: 4–8 y, 9–13 y, and 14–18 y.
Nutrient intake
Nutrient intakes were examined and compared to the gender-age appropriate DRIs (Tables 2 and 3). Compared with the Estimated Energy Requirements (EER), mean daily energy intakes across all gender-age groups exceeded the recommended energy intake by 10 to 71%. The mean daily energy intake was 2,304 kcal for children aged 5–8 years which exceeded the EER range of 1,400–1,600 kcal per day. Similarly, for children aged 9–13 years, the EER of 1,800–2,200 kcal per day for boys was exceeded with a mean daily intake of 2,429 kcal and the EER of 1,600–2,000 kcal per day for girls was exceeded with a mean daily intake of 2,732 kcal. Finally, for adolescents aged 14–16 years, the EERs of 2,400–2,800 kcal per day for boys and 2,000 kcal per day for girls were exceeded with a mean daily intake of 3,339 kcal and 2,846 kcal, respectively. Mean daily sugar intake was 160 grams for 5–8 year old children; 160 grams and 219 grams for boys age 9–13 and 14–16 years, respectively; and 136 grams and 202 grams for girls age 9–13 and 14–16 years, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). Mean daily sugar consumption was above the recommended amount for all gender and age groups except for girls aged 9–13 years. For boys and girls of all age groups combined, sugar accounted for 45% and 47%, respectively, of mean carbohydrate intake (data not shown). Percentage contribution to energy from protein, carbohydrates, and fat were within the AMDR for both boys and girls, with the exception of girls in 9–13 years age group whose energy from fat was above the AMDR by 3%. Across all the age groups, girls consumed more energy from fat than boys, whereas boys consumed more energy from carbohydrates. The proportions of energy from protein and carbohydrates showed a reciprocal relationship; as boys aged, the percentages of calories from protein decreased and the percentage from carbohydrates increased. Girls in the 9–13 years age group had the highest proportion of energy from protein and the lowest from carbohydrates, while the opposite trend was observed among girls in the 14–16 years age group. Both sexes in the 9–13 years age group had the highest percentage of energy from fat.
Table 2.
Boys (n=13) | Girls (n=11) | %NMc | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD)b | Medianb | Mean (SD)b | Medianb | ||
Age (years) | 7 (1·2) | 7 | 7 (1·1) | 7 | - |
Energy (kcal)d | 2350 (640) | 2097 | 2251 (584) | 2097 | - |
% calories from protein | 13·8 (3·7) | 10·9 | 11·6 (3·3) | 10·9 | - |
% calories from carbohydrates | 55·5 (8·8) | 55·7 | 54·3 (7·4) | 55·8 | - |
% calories from fat | 30·7 (6·8) | 33·0 | 34·2 (5·6) | 33·0 | - |
Protein (g) | 82·9 (32·6) | 66·0 | 64·5 (17·6) | 66·0 | - |
Carbohydrates (g) | 329·6 (100·6) | 297·4 | 311·4 (98·9) | 297·4 | - |
Sugars (g) | 157·2 (68·3) | 150·7 | 162·6 (53·0) | 150·8 | - |
Dietary fiber (g) | 14·7 (6·2)* | 13·1* | 13·3 (6·0)* | 13·2* | 96 |
Fat (g) | 82·1 (28·1) | 90·2 | 86·7 (25·5) | 90·3 | - |
Saturated fat (g) | 30·4 (9·0) | 29·6 | 29·4 (8·7) | 29·7 | - |
Monounsaturated fatty acids (g) | 20·3 (8·8) | 15·1 | 16·3 (6·3) | 15·2 | - |
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (g) | 10·2 (5·8) | 8·5 | 9·3 (3·4) | 8·5 | - |
n-3 fatty acids (g) | 0·7 (0·4)* | 0·5* | 0·5 (0·3)* | 0·5* | - |
n-6 fatty acids (g) | 8·8 (5·5)* | 7·4* | 7·2 (3·5)* | 7·4* | - |
Vitamin A (mcg_RAE) | 595·7 (442·3) | 318·2* | 331·6 (184·8)* | 318·2* | 42 |
Thiamin (mg) | 1·9 (1·0) | 1·1 | 1·3 (0·8) | 1·1 | 4 |
Riboflavin (mg) | 2·3 (1·0) | 1·8 | 1·7 (0·9) | 1·8 | 8 |
Niacin (mg) | 24·6 (8·4) | 16·7 | 17·3 (9·2) | 16·7 | 4 |
Vitamin B-6 (mg) | 2·2 (0·9) | 1·2 | 1·4 (0·9) | 1·2 | 33 |
Total Folate (µg) | 537·3 (329·9) | 250·8 | 328·6 (212·2) | 250·8 | 12 |
Vitamin B-12 (µg) | 5·3 (2·2) | 4·0 | 3·9 (2·8) | 4·0 | 12 |
Iron (mg) | 20·0 (8·0) | 14·0 | 14·8 (8·0) | 14·0 | 8 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 132.7 (91.8) | 259·7 | 309·4 (281·7) | 259·7 | 4 |
Vitamin D (mg)e | 7.0 (2.7)* | 5·0* | 5·4 (3·5) | 5·0 | 38 |
Vitamin E (mg)f | 2.8 (1.6)* | 2·8* | 3·4 (1·8)* | 2·8* | 92 |
Calcium (mg) | 1221 (424) | 1128 | 1070 (412) | 1128 | 23 |
Magnesium (mg) | 167.1 (64.9) | 144.9 | 154·4 (44·3) | 144·9 | 23 |
Potassium (mg) | 1831 (828)* | 1974* | 1858 (479)* | 1974·3* | - |
Sodium (mg) | 3219 (1384) | 3144 | 3134 (1145) | 3144 | - |
Zinc (mg) | 11.9 (5.4) | 6.5 | 6·5 | 5 | 67 |
RAE, Retinol Activity Equivalent
Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) of Adequate Intake (AI) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), and Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDR) for children aged 4–8 years
Mean and median intakes are compared to the DRI; intakes above the DRI are in bold, and intakes below the DRI are indicated with an asterick (*)
%NM represents percentage of both male and female participants whose dietary intakes did not meet the DRIs
The reference energy intake is the midpoint of Estimated Energy Requirements (EER) for moderately active
As cholecalciferol. In the absence of adequate exposure to sunlight
As alpha-tocopherol
Table 3.
9–13 years | 14–16 years | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | |||||||||
Mean (SD)b | Median b |
%N M |
Mean (SD)b | Median b |
%N M |
Mean (SD)b | Median b |
%N M |
Mean (SD)b | Median b |
% MN |
|
Age (years) | 11 (1·5) | 11 | - | 11 (1·5) | 11 | - | 15 (0·9) | 15 | - | 16 (0·9) | 16 | - |
Energy (kcal)c | 2429 (627) | 2284 | - | 2732 (1081) | 2481 | - | 3339 (1001) | 3240 | - | 2846 (984) | 2645 | - |
% calories from protein | 12·5 (2·4) | 12·7 | - | 13·7 (3·0) | 13·7 | - | 10·8 (3·6) | 11·6 | - | 10·8 (2·9) | 10·9 | - |
% calories from carbohydrates | 56·1 (8·0) | 57·5 | - | 48·3 (7·7) | 49·1 | - | 59·9 (10·6) | 58·6 | - | 58·5 (9·0) | 57·6 | - |
% calories from fat | 31·4 (7·6) | 29·8 | - | 38·0 (6·4) | 39·3 | - | 29·3 (8·8) | 29·8 | - | 30·7 (7·3) | 31·4 | - |
Protein (g) | 74·5 (13·5) | 74·6 | - | 96·4 (45·5) | 88·3 | - | 93·3 (44·1) | 84·9 | - | 78·3 (33·5) | 69·0 | - |
Carbohydrates (g) | 348·5 (110·9) | 328·1 | - | 332·5 (129·1) | 306·7 | - | 511·5 (174·1) | 474·6 | - | 427·1 (153·0) | 434·9 | - |
Sugars (g) | 160·0 (57·4) | 166·4 | - | 136·4 (59·6) * | 150·4* | - | 219·4 (86·9) | 209·9 | - | 202·2 (95·7) | 192·3 | - |
Dietary fiber (g) | 14·8 (5·5)* | 15·0* | 100 | 13·7 (7·0)* | 13·3* | 93 | 20·3 (13·1)* | 15·8* | 86 | 14·1 (7·5)* | 11·3* | 93 |
Fat (g) | 85·1 (27·1) | 78·5 | - | 117·3 (52·4) | 108·7 | - | 114·5 (51·0) | 109 | - | 100·5 (49·9) | 89·0 | - |
Saturated fat (g) | 29·1 (10·1) | 27·9 | - | 37·0 (16·9) | 34·5 | - | 39·9 (23·5) | 36·1 | - | 33·0 (17·3) | 27·8 | - |
Monounsaturated fatty acids (g) |
17·5 (10·4) | 15·0 | - | 31·6 (20·6) | 30·8 | - | 21·4 (17·1) | 17·9 | - | 21·7 (15·6) | 19·3 | - |
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (g) | 7·9 (4·7) | 6·5 | - | 14·5 (8·6) | 14·0 | - | 10·2 (8·3) | 9·2 | - | 9·4 (7·4) | 7·8 | - |
n-3 fatty acids (g) | 0·6 (0·4)* | 0·5* | - | 0·7 (0·3)* | 0·7* | - | 0·4 (0·3)* | 0·4* | - | 0·6 (0·5)* | 0·6* | - |
n-6 fatty acids (g) | 5·1 (3·5)* | 3·7* | - | 11·5 (7·8) | 10·5 | - | 7·8 (7·7)* | 6·4* | - | 7·3 (4·5)* | 6·7* | - |
Vitamin A (mcg_RAE) | 341·5 (228·6)* | 367·6* | 75 | 476·3 (469·3)* | 280·8* | 64 | 400·4 (330·0)* | 323·4* | 79 | 471·7 (560·3)* | 207·9* | 67 |
Thiamin (mg) | 1·3 (0·7) | 1·5 | 17 | 1·2 (0·5) | 1·3 | 29 | 1·4 (0·8) | 1·5 | 43 | 2·5 (3·5) | 1·4 | 20 |
Riboflavin (mg) | 1·7 (0·7) | 2·0 | 17 | 2·0 (1·0) | 1·8 | 14 | 2·3 (1·8) | 1·8 | 36 | 2·0 (1·4) | 1·6 | 20 |
Niacin (mg) | 17·2 (8·1) | 15·7 | 8 | 19·5 (9·5) | 17·1 | 7 | 18·0 (12·2) | 15·8 | 29 | 21·0 (14·0) | 16·3 | 13 |
Vitamin B-6 (mg) | 1·4 (0·7) | 1·4 | 33 | 1·5 (0·8) | 1·7 | 21 | 1·7 (1·3) | 1·4 | 36 | 1·8 (1·7) | 1·3 | 47 |
Total Folate (µg) | 364·0 (228·6) | 357·5 | 33 | 304·3 (175·5) | 292·0* | 36 | 356·9 (238·1)* | 381·6* | 43 | 441·6 (435·6) | 297·1* | 53 |
Vitamin B-12 (µg) | 3·9 (2·9) | 2·4 | 25 | 4·3 (2·1) | 4·7 | 7 | 4·5 (4·6) | 3·4 | 43 | 5·1 (4·3) | 3·5 | 20 |
Iron (mg) | 15·8 (5·0) | 16·7 | 8 | 15·0 (6·5) | 13·3 | 0 | 17·7 (7·6) | 17·4 | 7 | 17·7 (10·3) | 14·1* | 7 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 212·3 (164·3) | 194·6 | 17 | 112·1 (96·4) | 114·0 | 36 | 198·6 (163·6) | 152·9 | 21 | 171·2 (173·7) | 128·8 | 27 |
Vitamin D (mg)d | 4·1 (2·4)* | 3·7* | 75 | 3·3 (2·7)* | 2·9* | 64 | 3·3 (3·7)* | 2·3* | 71 | 4·8 (4·6)* | 4·0* | 60 |
Vitamin E (mg)e | 2·4 (1.3)* | 2·6* | 100 | 4·7 (4·9)* | 2·7* | 79 | 4·1 (7·1)* | 2·0* | 93 | 3·2 (2·1)* | 2·8* | 100 |
Calcium (mg) | 994 (305)* | 1101* | 92 | 786 (443)* | 708* | 86 | 1051 (597)* | 973·2* | 71 | 1148 (712)* | 1015* | 67 |
Magnesium (mg) | 127·4 (44·2)* | 136·6* | 100 | 164·9 (88·7)* | 182·3* | 71 | 173·9 (96·6)* | 160·8* | 93 | 162·8 (111·4)* | 138·8* | 93 |
Potassium (mg) | 1466 (560)* | 1444* | - | 1867(937)* | 2007·9* | - | 2021 (1005)* | 1974* | - | 1804 (1008)* | 1478·8* | - |
Sodium (mg) | 4278 (1126) | 4148 | - | 4435 (1336) | 4235·2 | - | 6858 (5171) | 5169 | - | 3920·1 (1291·4) | 4125·4 | - |
Zinc (mg) | 7·4 (4·3)* | 6·9* | 67 | 10·2 (6·0) | 8·56 | 36 | 7·5 (5·7)* | 6·3* | 64 | 10·5 (9·1) | 8·0* | 47 |
RAE, Retinol Activity Equivalent
Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) of Adequate Intake (AI) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), and Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDR) for youth aged 9–13 and 14–18 years
Mean and median intakes are compared to DRI; intakes above DRI are in bold, and intakes below DRI are indicated with an asterick (*)
The reference energy intake is the midpoint of Estimated Energy Requirements (EER) for moderately active
As cholecalciferol. In the absence of adequate exposure to sunlight
As alpha-tocopherol
Table 4.
Age (years) |
Food |
% contri.a to energy |
Food |
% contri.a to fat |
Food |
% contri.a to fiber |
Food |
% contri.a to sugar |
5–8 | Milk | 13·9 | Milk | 17·2 | Cereals | 13·4 | Sweetened drinks | 21·9 |
Pizza, any kind | 7·9 | Chips | 11·8 | Chips | 10·7 | Milk | 19·9 | |
Chips | 7·7 | Pizza, any kind | 9·3 | Raw fruits | 9·7 | Sweetened juices | 11·5 | |
Sweetened Drinks | 7·5 | Chicken dishes | 7·5 | Pizza, any kind | 8·8 | Cereals | 9·3 | |
Cereals | 7·1 | Frankfurters, sausages & lunchmeats |
6·9 | Canned fruits | 7·5 | Sodas | 6·8 | |
Breads | 5·5 | Sandwiches & burgers | 6·6 | Breads | 7·0 | Candies | 4·6 | |
Sandwiches & burgers |
5·2 | Meat dishes | 6·3 | Vegetables, any kind | 6·9 | Canned fruits | 3·4 | |
Chicken dishes | 5·1 | Nuts, any kind | 4·7 | Nuts, any kind | 4·3 | Raw fruits | 3·3 | |
Sweetened juices | 3·9 | Cakes, donuts & pastries | 3·8 | Hash browns & fried potatoes |
4·2 | Ice cream | 2·5 | |
Meat dishes | 3·6 | Hash browns & fried potatoes |
3·6 | Sandwiches & burgers | 4·2 | Cakes, donuts & pastries | 2·5 | |
Total | 67·3 | 77·6 | 76·7 | 85·7 | ||||
Age (years) |
Food |
% contri.a to energy |
Food |
% contri.a to fat |
Food |
% contri. ato fiber |
Food |
% contri.a to sugar |
9–13 | Chips | 10·1 | Chips | 15·1 | Chips | 13·5 | Sweetened drinks | 17·4 |
Pizza, any kind | 9·1 | Pizza, any kind | 9·8 | Pizza, any kind | 12·0 | Sweetened juices | 11·7 | |
Rice & pasta dishes | 7·4 | Chicken dishes | 9·3 | Rice & pasta dishes | 11·9 | Sodas | 11·6 | |
Chicken dishes | 6·0 | Meat dishes | 9·3 | Cereals | 10·7 | Milk | 11·1 | |
Cereals | 5·7 | Frankfurters, sausages & lunchmeat |
8·0 | Raw fruits | 8·6 | Canned fruits | 8·8 | |
Milk | 5·6 | Sandwiches & burgers | 6·3 | Breads | 7·2 | Candies | 7·2 | |
Meat dishes | 5·3 | Eggs | 5·6 | Vegetables, any kind | 5·6 | Cereals | 6·3 | |
Sodas | 4·8 | Milk | 5·4 | Canned fruits | 4·7 | Raw fruits | 3·6 | |
Sweetened drinks | 4·8 | Rice & pasta dishes | 4·9 | Beans, any kind | 4·0 | Cakes, donuts & pastries | 2·6 | |
Sandwiches & burgers |
4·7 | Hash browns & fried potatoes |
4·5 | Nuts, any kind | 4·0 | Cookies | 2·5 | |
Total | 63·4 | 78·4 | 82·0 | 82·9 | ||||
Age (years) |
Food |
% contri.a to energy |
Food |
% contri.a to energy |
Food |
% contri.a to energy |
Food | % contri.a to sugar |
14– | Pizza, any kind | 10·7 | Pizza, any kind | 13·0 | Pizza, any kind | 13·0 | Sweetened drinks | 21·8 |
Chips | 8·1 | Chips | 12·7 | Beans, any kind | 9·9 | Sweetened juices | 12·9 | |
Chicken dishes | 6·0 | Chicken dishes | 10·6 | Chips | 9·6 | Sodas | 10·6 | |
Breads | 6·0 | Cakes, donuts & pastries | 7·6 | Breads | 8·8 | Milk | 8·3 | |
Sweetened drinks | 5·7 | Sandwiches & burgers | 6·8 | Cereals | 5·9 | Candies | 6·2 | |
Cakes, donuts & pastries |
5·5 | Cookies | 6·2 | Vegetables, any kind | 4·6 | Sugar & syrup | 6·1 | |
Sodas | 5·3 | Milk | 6·0 | Sandwiches & burgers | 4·0 | Cereals | 5·5 | |
Milk | 5·2 | Meat dishes | 3·8 | Cakes, donuts & pastries | 3·7 | Cookies | 4·3 | |
Sandwiches & burgers |
4·6 | Ice cream | 3·8 | Rice & pasta dishes | 3·2 | Ice cream | 3·5 | |
Cookies | 4·6 | Breads | 3·0 | Chicken dishes | 3·0 | Canned fruits | 3·0 | |
Total | 61·8 | 73·6 | 65·7 | 82·2 |
percent contribution
The majority of participants did not meet the DRIs for dietary fiber and vitamin E across all gender-age groups. Nutrient intakes for all boys in the 9–13 year age group were below the recommendations for dietary fiber, vitamin E, and magnesium, while intakes for all girls in the 14–16 year age group were below recommendations for vitamin E. In addition, most boys and girls 9–16 years of age consumed vitamins A and D, calcium, and magnesium below the recommended levels. By comparison, 77% and 62% of children aged 5–8 years met the DRIs for calcium and vitamin D, respectively. The average intakes of iron, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and vitamins B-6, B-12, and C met the DRIs. Girls across all age groups and boys in the 5–8 years age group met the recommendations for a mean intake of zinc. Overall, children in the 5–8 years age group met the recommended intakes of many nutrients such as vitamins A, C, D, B-6 and B-12, folate, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc compared to older children and adolescents.
Food sources of energy and selected nutrients
Table 4 shows the top ten dietary sources of energy and selected nutrients by age group. Among children 5–8 years of age, milk was the primary contributor to energy, fat, and sugar accounting for 14%,17%, and 20% of the intakes, respectively. By contrast, the top contributer of energy and fat was chips among 9–13 year-olds and pizza among 14–16 year-olds,. Pizza and chips were among the top three sources of energy and fat across all age groups. Sweetened drinks, sweetened juices, and sodas were the top three sources of sugar among the older age groups, contributing a combined 41% for 9–13 year-olds and 45% for 14–16 year-olds. Sweetened drinks alone accounted for 22% of total carbohydrate consumption among children aged 5–8 years (data not shown).
Development of the YFFQ
All foods that were reported in the 24-hour dietary recalls, by two or more respondents, were included on the YFFQ. Foods that would be promoted as part of the nutritional intervention were also added so that any changes in pre- and post-intervention consumption could be assessed. For example, baked chips were included on the YFFQ as a lower-fat alternative to fried chips.
The YFFQ instrument contained 112 food and beverage items: four cereals, five dairy products, 17 sandwich and bread items, eight other foods including added sugars and fats, 20 main course dishes, 31 vegetables and fruits, 14 desserts and sweets, four salty snacks, and nine drinks; a list of ten additional foods was generated (Appendix 1). With assistance from community consultants and in accordance with the 24-hour recall data, standard units, household utensils, and three-dimensional food models were assigned to individual line items to assess portion size. Forty food items had portion size assessed using standard units such as a slice of bread; 21 food items were assessed using familiar household units such as a glass of milk; and 61 food items were assessed using food models appropriate for each item listed. Frequency of consumption was
DISCUSSION
This study examined dietary pattern among urban African American children and adolescents aged 5–16 years in Baltimore City, Maryland, and compared nutrient intakes with the DRIs. We also designed the YFFQ for this specific population by identifying most commonly consumed and culturally appropriate foods. There is an increasing need for appropriate intervention aimed at preventing or treating diet-related conditions and recognition for the impact of culture on lifestyle, and therefore developing a culturally-appropriate YFFQ is necessary.
Mean daily energy intake exceeded the EER across all gender-age groups. Our findings by comparison, are similar to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III that reported mean daily energy intakes, calculated from up to two 24-hour dietary recalls, in excess of DRI recommendations for a multi-ethnic sample of American children and adolescents in 2005–2006. While the NHANES III are comparable to findings from the present study, our results provides more insight into gender differences among African American boys and girls. Among NHANES III participants, boys 6–11 years of age and 12–19 years consumed 2,092 kcal and 2,707 kcal, respectively. Girls aged 6–11 years and 12–19 years consumed 1,879 kcal, and 1,906 kcal, respectively. Another study also used 24-hour dietary recalls in a multi-ethnic sample of American children, including 554 third-, fifth- and eighth-grade African American youth, and likewise reported energy intakes above the recommended levels31. Higher energy intakes among respondents may also be associated with increased intake of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods (i.e. pizza and sweetened drinks) among African American children and adolescents9.
Foods high in fat and sugar (i.e. pizza, chips, and sweetened drinks) were among the top contributors to energy, fat, and sugar intake across all gender-age groups. Furthermore, pizza and soda have been targeted as key foods contributing to increased energy intakes among children and adolescents over the past three decades; African American adolescents may be particularly susceptible to this trend9;10. Several studies among US children have identified increased energy intakes concurrent with increased consumption of sweetened beverages and high-fat foods, further increasing risk of overweight, obesity and related chronic disease32;33.
Lack of access to healthy foods may contribute to the health inequities observed among African Americans in the US. Franco et al. described racial and economic disparities in access to healthy foods in Baltimore City. A total of 43% of predominantly African American neighborhoods, and 46% of lower-income neighborhoods were in the lowest tertile of healthy food availability, compared to predominantly higher-income neighborhoods where only 13% of individuals were represented in the lower tertile of healthy food accessibility19. Residents in disadvantaged neighborhoods have greater exposure to fast food outlets and convenience stores34, and tend to consume more nutrient-poor foods, resulting in increased risk for potential adverse health outcomes35;36. Aggarwal et al. (2012) reported an association between high food cost and increasing consumption of dietary fiber, vitamins and minerals37. This previous finding supports our results; the average intakes of dietary fiber, vitamins A, D, and E, calcium, magnesium, and potassium were below recommendations among both boys and girls in the 9–16 years age group. A seemingly better diet quality among younger children (5–8 years age group) may be attributed to parents having more control over their diet compared to older children or adolescents38;39. Partnering with local food stores to increase access to healthy foods may serve as a powerful tool in reducing systematic local barriers that are shown to exist by race, ethnicity, and income40. Modifying the food environment to promote nutrient-rich foods may be an effective public health initiative to improve food choices and consumption for a community-based intervention program.
Age and healthy diets have a positive association among adults41, presumably due to increasing health concerns42. Contrarily, among younger populations, a negative association was reported previously, as children tend to have higher dietary scores38 and a greater consumption of vegetables and fruits43 compared to adolescents. Consumption of soda and sweetened beverages may be associated with low intakes of calcium and vitamins A and D observed among children and adolescents 9–16 years of age. Lytle et al. identified an inverse relationship between consumption of soda and sweetened beverages and consumption of milk among American youth31. Similarly, our study showed a step-wise decrease in milk consumption with age coupled with a comparatively high consumption of sweetened beverages. Additionally, this study found greater frequency of consumption of cereal, chicken dishes, and vegetables in the 5–8 years age group compared to older age groups. These dietary data are of significant interest as numerous studies have found that diet quality among US youth declines as they age and similarly, the rates of childhood overweight and obesity escalate with increasing age29;31;44. However, the lack of age and culturally appropriate dietary assessment methods limits the nutritional epidemiology studies undertaken and the subsequent number and quality of nutritional intervention programs45. As such, a population-specific dietary assessment instrument is necessary to describe food and nutrient intake among African American children and adolescents in Baltimore City.
Gender differences in dietary patterns were observed in the older age groups (9–16 age groups), and as the average intakes of added sugar, folate and zinc among girls met the recommendations whereas those of boys did not. However, girls in these age groups had lower mean intakes for vitamins C and E, suggesting that low-income girls may have limited fruit consumption as reported by Pitel et al. (2013)39. Although in general, girls tend to follow a healthier diet than boys regardless of age38, gender-specific dietary behaviors may be different between low-income boys and girls39.
The food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) has been used to assess dietary quality and determine consumption patterns in youth in several well-known surveys and studies46–48. Another study also used a FFQ to assess dietary intake in children based on the Willett FFQ49–51. The development of a culturally and youth-specific FFQ requires three major components for comprehensive dietary assessment: a complete food list, food grouping that reflects the dietary habits and cultural practices of the target population, and frequency of consumption categories52;53. The foods selected must be commonly consumed by a substantial segment of the population and contain significant amounts of nutrients of interest52;54;55. Single 24-hour dietary recalls were used in this study to generate the initial list. However, some food grouping is necessary to reduce participant burden and should follow a logical order that is clear to the study population52;55. For the present study, the dietary recall data as well as the focus group discussions were used to inform the grouping and ordering of the foods and to determine appropriate food models for the population.
The 24-hour recall data characterized current food and nutrient intake and highlighted specific foods to be targeted for future nutrition intervention programs aimed at reducing obesity. Many of the most frequently consumed foods (e.g. sweetened drinks, chips, and candies) can be replaced with lower-sugar, lower-fat and often more nutrient-dense alternatives. For example, intervention strategies to reduce sugar and fat intake might include promoting baked chips or low sodium pretzels in place of fried chips, choosing reduced fat or low-fat milk instead of whole milk, and substituting sweetened juices and drinks with unsweetened juices, sugar-free beverages and water. While these are simple solutions to reduce fat and sugar intake, efforts to increase consumption of nutrient-rich foods such as fruit, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, and lean proteins will require further public health research as well as age and culturally appropriate nutrition intervention.
A comprehensive dietary assessment tool is essential for impact evaluation of a nutritional intervention program. FFQs have been used previously to evaluate interventions and to assess dietary intake for other study populations56–60. The YFFQ developed in the present study was interviewer-administered, which reduces respondent burden and has been shown to be more feasible than multiple dietary recalls in studies among African American communities61. Once validated, this tool may be effectively used to evaluate future nutrition interventions targeted for urban African American youth. The same methodology has been used to evaluate the impact of nutritional intervention strategies in African American and other multi-ethnic populations57;58;60.
This study is not without limitations. A convenience sample was recruited and the sample size was relatively small. The nutrient intakes were estimated using single recalls. However, the administration of multiple recalls may have significantly increased respondent burden and therefore decreased study participation of low-income African American children and adolescents in Baltimore City.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates dietary pattern, which may have contributed to the increased prevalence of overweight and obesity among low-income urban African American children and adolescents. Our results also propose a potential evaluation tool, YFFQ, for implementing community-based nutritional intervention programs to improve dietary quality and reduce risk factors for overweight and obesity.
Acknowledgments
Funding Source:
This research was supported by the NIEHS (PO1 ES 018176; P50 ES 015903), U.S. EPA (RD8345101). NIEHS had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.
Thanks to Ms. Erin Mead for reviewing the manuscript.
Appendix 1
Category | Food items |
---|---|
Cereal (4) | Cereals such as Frosted Flakes, Fruity Pebbles, Froot Loops, Apple Jacks, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Trix, Cap-n Crunch (high sugar); Cereals such as Rice Chex, Cheerios, Cornflakes, Rice Krispies, Kix (lower sugar); Cereals such as Branflakes, Shredded Wheat, Granola (high fiber); Oatmeal, cream of wheat, or grits (cooked) |
Dairy (5) | Whole milk incl. carton; 2% milk incl. carton; 1% or skim milk incl. carton; Chocolate or strawberry milk incl. milkshake, hot chocolate, and carton; Yogurt |
Sandwiches, Breads, and Buns (17) |
Peanut butter and jelly sandwich, Cheese sandwich incl. grilled cheese sandwich, Breakfast sandwich incl. McGriddle sandwich, breakfast burrito; Lunch meat sandwich; Tuna or salmon sandwich; Burger incl. Burger King, McDonald’s, or Checker’s burger, cheesesteak; Veggie burger; Fried chicken sandwich incl. McDonald’s or Burger King, breaded chicken patty; Grilled chicken sandwich such as McDonald’s, incl. patties, turkey burger; Hot dog with bun; Taco; White bread NOT in sandwich incl. French toast, dinner rolls, bagel; Wheat bread alone (split top bread of 100% whole wheat); Cornbread; Waffles; |
Other foods (8) | Added sugar on cereal or fruits or to drinks; Butter or margarine incl. on toast, pancakes, waffles, sausage, baked potato, pasta; Syrup; Cheese NOT in sandwich or burger incl. American cheese with crackers, Lunchables, string cheese; Cheese spread, Easy cheese spray, or nacho cheese; Sausage; Eggs |
Main dishes (20) | Pizza, Hot Pockets, Lunchable pizza; Steak or roast beef; Meatloaf; Pork and beans, baked beans; Pork chops; Chicken wings; Fried chicken (NOT wings) incl. breast, thigh, or drumstick; Baked or grilled chicken, rotisserie chicken, BBQ chicken, roasted turkey; Chicken nuggets, chicken strips, fingers, tenders, or popcorn chicken; Fried, baked, grilled, or steamed fish NOT in sandwich; Fish sticks; Crab cake; Rice; Macaroni and cheese, Easy Mac; Spaghetti incl. |
Vegetables and Fruits (31) |
French fries such as steak fries, curly fries, tater tots, or hash browns; Sauces incl. ketchup, BBQ, sweet and sour, or steak; Mashed potatoes; Gravy; Baked potato; Sweet potato or yam; Greens incl. spinach, collard, mustard, or kale; Sweet corn; Corn on the cob; String beans, green beans; Broccoli or cauliflower; Any green salad; Cucumber; Celery; Baby carrots; Cooked carrots; Squash or pumpkin; Regular dressing incl. Italian, Ranch, Bleu cheese, or Caesar; Light dressing incl. Italian, Ranch; Canned fruits such as mixed fruit, fruit cocktail, fruit cup, canned peaches, pineapples, or tangerines; Fresh orange or tangerine; Fresh fruit salad; Apple or pear; Applesauce; Banana; Grapes; Fresh pineapple; Fresh peaches, plums, or nectarines; Berries incl. |
Cakes, Desserts, and Sweet Snacks (14) |
Snacks such as Tastykakes, brownies, or cupcakes; Muffins incl. regular or mini; Little Debbie’s oatmeal cream pie, McDonald’s, or Burger King; Doughnut incl. regular or mini; Pop-tarts, Honey Buns, or Danish; Snowballs or popsicles; Pudding incl. chocolate or vanilla; Cookies, wafers, or graham crackers; Granola bar; Sugar candies incl. Starburst, fruit roll-ups, or mints; Chocolate candy or candy bars incl. Snickers or M&Ms; Gum incl. bubble gum; Ice cream |
Salty snacks (4) | Potato chips, corn chips, Lays, UTZ, Doritos, Fritos, or cheese curls; Cheez-Its or Ritz crackers; Baked chips incl. Lays or Utz, sunflower chips, Sun Chips; Popcorn incl. microwave or snack bag; |
Drinks (9) | Soda incl. Pepsi, Coca Cola; Dr. Pepper, or grape soda; Diet soda, diet energy drinks incl. Diet Pepsi or Pepsi One; Sugary drinks incl. iced tea, lemonade, Kool Aid, punch, Clear Fruit, orange drink, Capri Sun, Sunny D, or Hugs; 100% fruit juices incl. orange juice, apple, grape, pineapple, or Juicy Juice; Diet drinks such as Crystal Light or flavored water; Sport drinks such as Splash or Gatorade; Energy drinks such as Monster, Red Bull, or Rockstar; Water incl. |
Additional foods (10) | Jello; Mixed vegetables, incl. peas; Lunchable meats; Soup, any kind; Burrito, any kind; Fried fish sandwich incl. Filet-o-fish, lake trout sandwich; Salmon cake; Chili, stew; Sloppy joe sandwich; Fried, grilled, pan-fried shrimp. |
Footnotes
Authors contributions:
FK and JLB wrote and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; KC, GBD, PNB, NN, MCC, TS and JG critically revised the manuscript for improvement intellectual content; SS designed the study and provided essential data and finalized the manuscripts; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics
This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Signed parental consent and child assent were obtained for each participant prior to beginning the interview. On completion of the interview, participants were given a $20 gift certificate/card to a local store for their time.
Reference List
- 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:242–249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) CDC grand rounds: childhood obesity in the United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:42–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–2850. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang Y, Tussing L, Odoms-Young A, et al. Obesity prevention in low socioeconomic status urban African-american adolescents: study design and preliminary findings of the HEALTH-KIDS Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:92–103. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dabelea D, Bell RA, D'Agostino RB, Jr, et al. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA. 2007;297:2716–2724. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC, et al. A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1138–1145. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr043743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Braunschweig CL, Gomez S, Liang H, et al. Obesity and risk factors for the metabolic syndrome among low-income, urban, African American schoolchildren: the rule rather than the exception? Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:970–975. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.5.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goran MI, Ball GD, Cruz ML. Obesity and risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1417–1427. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Piernas C, Popkin BM. Increased portion sizes from energy-dense foods affect total energy intake at eating occasions in US children and adolescents: patterns and trends by age group and sociodemographic characteristics, 1977–2006. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1324–1332. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.008466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Piernas C, Popkin BM. Food portion patterns and trends among U.S. children and the relationship to total eating occasion size, 1977–2006. J Nutr. 2011;141:1159–1164. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.138727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Young LR, Nestle M. Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:231–234. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bowman SA, Gortmaker SL, Ebbeling CB, Pereira MA, Ludwig DS. Effects of fast-food consumption on energy intake and diet quality among children in a national household survey. Pediatrics. 2004;113:112–118. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Adair LS, Popkin BM. Are child eating patterns being transformed globally? Obes Res. 2005;13:1281–1299. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Krebs-Smith SM, Cook A, Subar AF, Cleveland L, Friday J, Kahle LL. Fruit and vegetable intakes of children and adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:81–86. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170260085014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harrington S. The role of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescent obesity: a review of the literature. J Sch Nurs. 2008;24:3–12. doi: 10.1177/10598405080240010201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harnack L, Walters SA, Jacobs DR., Jr Dietary intake and food sources of whole grains among US children and adolescents: data from the 1994–1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:1015–1019. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(03)00470-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang Y, Liang H, Tussing L, Braunschweig C, Caballero B, Flay B. Obesity and related risk factors among low socio-economic status minority students in Chicago. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:927–938. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007658005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schefske SD, Bellows AC, Byrd-Bredbenner C, et al. Nutrient analysis of varying socioeconomic status home food environments in New Jersey. Appetite. 2010;54:384–389. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Franco M, Diez Roux AV, Glass TA, Caballero B, Brancati FL. Neighborhood characteristics and availability of healthy foods in Baltimore. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:561–567. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carson JA, Michalsky L, Latson B, et al. The cardiovascular health of urban African Americans: diet-related results from the Genes, Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness, and Spiritual Growth (GoodNEWS) trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112:1852–1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dennisuk LA, Coutinho AJ, Suratkar S, et al. Food expenditures and food purchasing among low-income, urban, African-American youth. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:625–628. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lucan SC, Barg FK, Long JA. Promoters and barriers to fruit, vegetable, and fast-food consumption among urban, low-income African Americans--a qualitative approach. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:631–635. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.172692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Knol LL, Haughton B, Fitzhugh EC. Dietary patterns of young, low-income US children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:1765–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Feinberg E, Kavanagh PL, Young RL, Prudent N. Food insecurity and compensatory feeding practices among urban black families. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e854–e860. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hildebrand DA, Shriver LH. A quantitative and qualitative approach to understanding fruit and vegetable availability in low-income african-american families with children enrolled in an urban head start program. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:710–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.U.S. Census Bureau. ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates:2008 2008 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. 2008 Ref Type: Online Source. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Obese (Students Who Were >= 95th Percentile For Body Mass Index, Based On Sex- And Age-Specific Reference Data From The 2000 Cdc Growth Charts) Maryland, High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey. 2011 Ref Type: Online Source. [Google Scholar]
- 28.U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010. 2010 Ref Type: Online Source. [Google Scholar]
- 29.World Health Organization. Population-based Prevention Strategies for Childhood Obesity. Report of a WHO forum and Technical Meeting. 2010 Ref Type: Online Source.
- 30.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Dietary reference intakes for Energy, Carbohydrates, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. Ref Type: Serial (Book, Monograph) [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lytle LA, Himes JH, Feldman H, et al. Nutrient intake over time in a multi-ethnic sample of youth. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:319–328. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sahota P, Rudolf MC, Dixey R, Hill AJ, Barth JH, Cade J. Evaluation of implementation and effect of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity. BMJ. 2001;323:1027–1029. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neilson HK, Robson PJ, Friedenreich CM, Csizmadi I. Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:279–291. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hilmers A, Hilmers DC, Dave J. Neighborhood disparities in access to healthy foods and their effects on environmental justice. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1644–1654. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Keita AD, Casazza K, Thomas O, Fernandez JR. Neighborhood-level disadvantage is associated with reduced dietary quality in children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:1612–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dubowitz T, Heron M, Bird CE, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americans in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1883–1891. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hiza HA, Casavale KO, Guenther PM, Davis CA. Diet quality of Americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pitel L, Madarasova GA, Reijneveld SA, van Dijk JP. Socioeconomic differences in adolescent health-related behavior differ by gender. J Epidemiol. 2013;23:211–218. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Powell LM, Slater S, Mirtcheva D, Bao Y, Chaloupka FJ. Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Prev Med. 2007;44:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dorner TE, Stronegger WJ, Hoffmann K, Stein KV, Niederkrotenthaler T. Socio-economic determinants of health behaviours across age groups: results of a cross-sectional survey. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013;125:261–269. doi: 10.1007/s00508-013-0360-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lucan SC, Barg FK, Karasz A, Palmer CS, Long JA. Perceived influences on diet among urban, low-income African Americans. Am J Health Behav. 2012;36:700–710. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.36.5.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lorson BA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Taylor CA. Correlates of fruit and vegetable intakes in US children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:474–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nicklas TA, Hayes D. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition guidance for healthy children ages 2 to 11 years. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1038–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Flynn MA, McNeil DA, Maloff B, et al. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations. Obes Rev. 2006;7(Suppl 1):7–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994:1–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Murphy SP, Castillo RO, Martorell R, Mendoza F. An evaluation of food group intakes by Mexican-American children. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90:388–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Domel SB, Baranowski T, Davis H, Leonard SB, Riley P, Baranowski J. Fruit and vegetable food frequencies by fourth and fifth grade students: validity and reliability. J Am Coll Nutr. 1994;13:33–39. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1994.10718368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Assessing diets of children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1116S–1122S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1116S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Willett WC, Sampson L, Browne ML, et al. The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;127:188–199. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:51–65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires - a review. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:567–587. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shahar D, Shai I, Vardi H, Brener-Azrad A, Fraser D. Development of a semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to assess dietary intake of multiethnic populations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:855–861. doi: 10.1023/a:1025634020718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Ref Type: Serial (Book, Monograph) [Google Scholar]
- 55.Stark A. An historical review of the Harvard and the National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires: Their similarities, differences, and their limitations in assessment of food intake. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 2002;41:35–74. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sharma S, Cao X, Gittelsohn J, Anliker J, Ethelbah B, Caballero B. Dietary intake and a food-frequency instrument to evaluate a nutrition intervention for the Apache in Arizona. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:948–956. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007662302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sharma S, Cao X, Harris R, Hennis AJ, Leske MC, Wu SY. Dietary intake and development of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire for the Barbados National Cancer Study. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:464–470. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007220531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sharma S, Cao X, Gittelsohn J, et al. Dietary intake and development of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire for a lifestyle intervention to reduce the risk of chronic diseases in Canadian First Nations in north-western Ontario. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:831–840. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007001218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sharma S, Cao X, Harris R, Hennis AJ, Wu SY, Leske MC. Assessing dietary patterns in Barbados highlights the need for nutritional intervention to reduce risk of chronic disease. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2008;21:150–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2008.00858.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sharma S, Cao X, Arcan C, et al. Assessment of dietary intake in an inner-city African American population and development of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire to highlight foods and nutrients for a nutritional invention. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60(Suppl 5):155–167. doi: 10.1080/09637480902755061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yanek LR, Moy TF, Becker DM. Comparison of food frequency and dietary recall methods in African-American women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:1361–1364. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00326-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]