Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr 22;39(6):522–530. doi: 10.1111/pace.12845

Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections due to Propionibacterium Species

Abdelghani El Rafei 1, Daniel C DeSimone 1, M Rizwan Sohail 1, Christopher V DeSimone 1, James M Steckelberg 1, Walter R Wilson 1, Larry M Baddour 1
PMCID: PMC4889492  NIHMSID: NIHMS767882  PMID: 26970081

Abstract

Introduction

Propionibacterium species are part of the normal skin flora and often considered contaminants when identified in cultures. However, they can cause life-threatening infections, including prosthetic cardiovascular device infections. Clinical presentation and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection due to Propionibacterium species has not been well described.

Methods

Retrospective review of all cases of CIED infection due to Propionibacterium species admitted to Mayo Clinic between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2014. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical, microbiological, and imaging data. Descriptive analysis was performed.

Results

We identified 14 patients with CIED infection due to Propionibacterium species, accounting for 2.3% of all CIED infections. Patients were predominantly male (n=12, 86%). The median age at admission was 58.5 years [range, 22–83]. Twelve patients had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and 2 had permanent pacemaker (PPM) systems. Twelve patients had generator pocket infection (86%). Two patients met clinical criteria for CIED-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). Median time between last device manipulation and infection was 9 months [range, 1–98]. All patients were treated with complete device removal and antibiotic therapy. Six-month follow-up data were available for 10 patients (71%), with no relapses documented.

Conclusion

CIED infections due to Propionibacterium species accounted for 2.3% of all device infections over a 25-year period. The most common infectious syndrome was generator pocket infection with delayed onset. There was an unanticipated predominance of ICDs in this cohort. Cure was achieved in all cases with complete device removal and antibiotic therapy.

Keywords: Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED), infection, Propionibacterium species, CIED-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE)

Introduction

Propionibacterium species are anaerobic, biofilm-forming, Gram-positive bacilli that are a ubiquitous part of the human skin flora and are commonly considered contaminants in cultures [1]. However, Propionibacterium species can cause significant infections, especially in the setting of prosthetic devices (eg, cardiac valves, prosthetic joints, and central nervous system ventricular shunts) [13].

Current literature on the infection of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) by Propionibacterium species is scarce and limited to only case reports [47]. Therefore, the ability of these organisms to cause CIED infections is not widely appreciated. In addition, these organisms are slow to grow in routine bacterial cultures and often require prolonged incubation [8]. This may further limit their identification as causative organisms of CIED infection because cultures may be discarded before slow-growing organisms, such as Propionibacterium species, are identified. A better understanding of the clinical manifestations and management of CIED infection due to Propionibacterium species is needed, as device infections are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and financial cost [9]. We therefore describe an institutional case series of CIED infections due to Propionibacterium species that highlights our diagnostic and therapeutic approaches over the past 25 years.

Methods

Study population

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of adults (≥18 years of age) with CIED infection due to Propionibacterium species treated at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2014. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical, microbiological, and imaging data. All patients consented to the use of their medical records for research purposes. The study protocol was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.

Definitions

CIED infections were classified into 3 different clinical syndromes [10, 11]: 1) pocket infection: defined by the presence of local signs of inflammation at the generation pocket, including erythema, warmth, fluctuance, erosion, tenderness, purulent drainage, or lead erosion with positive cultures from pocket tissue or device material yielding Propionibacterium species. 2) CIED-related blood stream infection (BSI): defined as positive blood cultures for Propionibacterium species in the absence of alternative source of infection and resolution of blood stream infection after device explantation. 3) CIED-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE): defined as positive blood cultures for Propionibacterium species, and the presence of intracardiac (device lead or valve) vegetation documented by echocardiography, or if the modified Duke’s Criteria for IE [12] were met. Patients with negative blood cultures who presented with systemic symptoms of infection and had unexplained intracardiac vegetation on echocardiography were included if the cardiac device lead tip culture yielded Propionibacterium species. Vegetation was defined as an oscillating intracardiac mass on the device lead or cardiac valve confirmed by echocardiography in more than 1 plane.

Time to infection was calculated from the last device manipulation date, if available. Late infection was defined as infection after 1 year of device placement or system manipulation.

Descriptive statistics on baseline data were defined as count (percentage), mean (±SD), or median [range], as appropriate.

Results

Fourteen patients with CIED infection due to Propionibacterium species were identified between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2014, accounting for 2.3% of all CIED infections (n=618) over the study period. Patients were predominately male (n=12; 86%), median age was 58.5 years [range, 22–83], and median BMI was 27.5 [range, 20–38]. All patients had the device placed using a left pectoral approach. Twelve patients (86%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD); 2 patients (14%) had permanent pacemakers (PPMs). Median time between device placement and infection was 9 months [range, 1–98]. Patient demographics, device characteristics, clinical presentation, and management of each case are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographics, Device Type/Status, Clinical Presentation, and Management of Propionibacterium Species CIED Infections

Case
(Year of
Diagnosis)
Age/Sex Comorbidities Device/
Chamber
Total
Device
Procedures
Prior to
Infection
Last Device
Manipulation
(Time to
Infection,
Months)
Initial Presentation Echocardiog
raphy (Vegetation
Site)
Culture Results
(Pocket/
Lead/
Blood)
Antibiotic
Therapy
(In-hospital
/
Discharge)
Treatment/Outco
me (Follow-up
Months)
1 (1994) 62/M CAD, CHF PPM/Single 3 N/A (3) Fever, chills, sweating, malaise, murmur TTE+TEE (V+L′) P • /L+1/1/B+N/A N/A Complete removal/Cured (1)
2* (1995) 50/F None ICD/Dual 1 Initial placement (1) Erythema, swelling, drainage, pus, IOP at generator pocket N/A P+3/4/L+1/1/B−0/2 N/A Complete removal/Cured (131)
3 (2002) 50/M Lymphoma, CHF ICD/Dual 2 System upgrade (36) Fever, chills, hypotension, tachycardia, malaise, erythema, pain, swelling, IOP at generator pocket TEE (L′) P−0/6/L+1/1/B−0/4 Vancomycin~/Vancomycin~ Complete removal/Cured (19)
4* (2003) 68/M CAD, CHF ICD/Dual 2 N/A (11) Lead erosion N/A P+1/1/L+1/1/B−0/2 Cefazolin/Cephalexin Complete removal/Cured (21)
5* (2004) 22/M None ICD/Dual 1 Initial placement (10) Erythema, pain, pus, lead erosion, IOP at generator pocket N/A P+2/2/L+1/1/B−0/2 Vancomycin/Vancomycin Complete removal/Cured (109)
6 (2005) 76/M CAD, Hx of leukemia ICD/Single 2 Generator change (3) Erythema, swelling, drainage, pus, IOP at generator pocket TEE (Negative) P • /L+1/1/B−0/7 Vancomycin/N/A Complete removal^/Cured (0)
7 (2005) 83/M Hx of bladder Cancer, CAD, splenectomy, CHF ICD/Dual 4 Lead change (1) Erythema, warmth, drainage, IOP at generator pocket N/A P+1/1/L−0/2/B−0/1 Vancomycin/Linezolid(PO) Complete removal/Cured (6)
8 (2007) 78/M CAD, CHF ICD/Single 1 Initial placement (9) Erythema, pain, swelling, warmth, tender, drainage, IOP at generator pocket N/A P+2/3/L−0/2/B−0/2 Vancomycin~/Cephalexin Complete removal/Cured (15)
9 (2008) 48/M Giant cell myocarditis, CHF ICD/Dual 2 Generator change (36) Erythema, swelling, warmth, tenderness, IOP at generator pocket TEE (Negative) P+1/1/L−0/2/B−0/4 Vancomycin/Vancomycin Complete removal^/Cured (82)
10 (2008) 47/M CHF ICD/Single 2 System upgrade (98) Erythema, swelling TTE (Negative) P+2/4/L−0/3/B−0/7 Cefazolin/None Complete removal/Cured (79)
11 (2008) 68/M CAD, CHF ICD/Dual 2 System upgrade (2) Lead erosion TTE (Negative) P−0/2/L+2/3/B−0/2 Vancomycin/Linezolid (PO) Complete removal/Cured (0)
12 (2010) 55/M CAD ICD/Dual 1 Initial placement (14) Erythema, pain, tenderness, pus, IOP at generator pocket TTE (Negative) P+1/4/L−0/3/B−0/2 Vancomycin~/Vancomycin~ Complete removal/Cured (0)
13 (2010) 79/F Hx of melanoma PPM/Dual 2 Generator change (15) Erythema, pain, pus, IOP at generator pocket TEE (L′) P−0/3/L+2/2/B−0/4 Vancomycin/Vancomycin Complete removal/Cured (56)
14 (2013) 52/M None ICD/Dual 3 Generator change (3) Swelling, IOP at generator pocket N/A P+2/3/L−0/1/B−0/2 Vancomycin/Vancomycin Complete removal/Cured (17)
*

Cases with mixed infection “Propionibacterium species + CONS.” Total device procedures prior to infection: all device-related procedures including previous/initial placement.

Hx, history of; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; IOP, intraoperative purulence; PPM, permanent pacemaker; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram; TEE, transesophageal echocardiogram; V, valve; L′, lead vegetation; ~, in combination with other antibiotics; ^, intraoperative complication requiring a second procedure; P, pocket; L, lead; B, blood; #/#, number of positive cultures for Propionibacterium species/number of cultures taken; +, positive; −, negative; •, N/A; Ab, antibiotics.

Five patients (36%) presented with late infection. The most common presenting clinical syndrome was pocket infection (12 patients [86%]), and 2 patients met the clinical criteria for CIED-IE (cases 1 and 3). All patients but one had signs of infection at generator pocket site on presentation. Two patients only presented with systemic symptoms (Table 2).

Table 2.

Demographic and Clinical Features of Patients With CIED Infection due to Propionibacterium Species

Characteristics: No. (%)
Male 12 (86)
Age at admission, median [range] 58.5 [22–83]
BMI, median [range] 27.5 [20–38]
Permanent pacemaker (PPM) 2 (14)
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) 12 (86)
Total procedures prior to infection, median [range] 2 [1–4]

Comorbidities
Congestive heart failure (CHF) 8 (57)
Coronary artery disease (CAD) 6 (43)
Anticoagulation 5 (36)
Malignancy 3 (21)
Chemotherapy 1 (6)
Autoimmune disease 1 (6)
Immunosuppression drugs 1 (6)
Splenectomy 1 (6)
Diabetes mellitus/Hemodialysis/Liver disease/Graft/Steroids/HIV 0 (0)

Presentation
Local Finding at Generator Site
Erythema 10 (71)
Intraoperative purulence 10 (71)
Swelling 7 (50)
Pain 5 (36)
Pus 5 (33)
Drainage 4 (29)
Chills 2 (17)
Warmth 3 (21)
Tender 2 (17)
Erosion 3 (21)
Systemic Symptoms
Fever 2 (21)
Malaise 2 (21)
Tachycardia 1 (6)
Sweating 1 (6)
Hypotension 1 (6)

Microbiology
Positive pocket culture 9 (64)
Positive lead culture 8 (57)
Positive blood culture 1 (7)
Number of positive cultures for Propionibacterium species >1 9 (71)

Treatment
Duration of Ab therapy (days) Median, [Range] 15 [10–38]
New device 13 (93)

Culture specimens were obtained from the generator pocket, device lead, and blood. Propionibacterium acne was recovered in 7 cases (50%), Propionibacterium avidum in 1 case (7%), and the remaining 6 species (43%) could not be further identified. Three patients with polymicrobial infection (Propionibacterium species and coagulase-negative staphylococcus in each case) were included in this series. All 3 cases were pocket infections, and mixed cultures were obtained from generator pocket samples.

Echocardiography was performed in 8 patients (57%); 3 patients had transthoracic echocardiography, 4 had transesophageal echocardiography, and 1 patient had both performed. There was echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac vegetation in 3 patients; 2 had lead vegetations, and 1 had vegetations on a device lead and tricuspid valve. Case 13 had lead vegetation, but did not meet clinical criteria for CIED-IE. Peripheral emboli and metastatic infections were not observed in any patients.

All patients underwent device removal; 12 patients had complete system removal on initial intervention, and 2 patients (14%) had intraoperative complications leading to partial removal. This was followed up by another procedure to remove retained material. Median time to positive culture of a device generator pocket/lead was 4 days [range, 3–6]. Blood cultures were positive in 1 patient, but the time to positivity information was unavailable. Thirteen patients (93%) underwent new device placement. Median time between device removal and reimplantation was 8 days [range, 6–18].

In vitro susceptibility results were available for only 5 isolates (cases 1, 2, 7, 13, and 14), and all isolates were penicillin susceptible (MIC ≤1). Details of in-hospital antimicrobial therapy were available for 12 patients; 10 patients (83%) received vancomycin or a regimen including vancomycin, and 2 patients (17%) received cefazolin. Antimicrobial therapy prescribed for the post-hospitalization period were available in 11 patients; 6 patients (55%) received vancomycin or a regimen that included vancomycin, 4 patients (36%) received oral therapy (2 linezolid, 2 cephalexin), and 1 patient (9%) didn’t receive any antibiotics after discharge. Antibiotic therapy is described in detail for each patient in Table 1. Overall, median duration of antibiotic therapy was 15 days [range, 10–38]. Six-month follow-up data were available for 10 patients (71%). None of these patients had CIED infection relapse.

Discussion

We describe the largest series of CIED infections due to Propionibacterium species to date. Propionibacterium species accounted for 2.3% of all CIED infections (n=618) over a 25 year study period, signifying the infrequency of this infection. Median time from last device manipulation (including de novo placement) to clinical infection was 9 months, approximately 4 months longer than what has been previously described for ICDs [11]. This is likely due to low virulency of Propionibacterium species leading to indolent infection. This has been well described in prosthetic joint infections [13, 14] as well as prosthetic valve endocarditis, in which the median time to infection from valve placement was approximately 4 years [2], assuming that valve contamination with Propionibacterium species occurred at the time of valve placement.

The majority of infections occurred in males with an ICD (n= 11, 79%). The predominance of males in Propionibacterium species–related infections has been well documented [1, 2, 13]. Kanafani et al [13] suggested that a tropism of Propionibacterium species to cause infections in males is related to higher testosterone levels, which increase the population of these organisms on the skin. The predominance of ICD infections in this cohort was somewhat unexpected, considering that the majority of implanted CIEDs are PPMs [9]. While the precise reason for this disproportionate involvement of ICDs is unclear, it may be due to the larger size of ICD generators. Prior research has demonstrated that biofilm formation is an important virulence factor for invasive Propionibacterium acnes infections [15]; thus, the larger size of the ICD generator may provide additional surface area for microbial adherence and multiplication. However, the size of this cohort is too small to draw any conclusions regarding biofilm formation on different types of CIEDs.

The most common clinical infection syndrome in our series was generator pocket infection. Propionibacterium species are the most commonly isolated organisms from generator pockets either following de novo implantation or device replacement [16, 17]. In a prospective study of 100 patients undergoing either de novo implantation or replacement (for noninfectious causes) of a PPM, device generator pocket swab cultures were positive for Propionibacterium species in 42% [17]. Mason et al. [16] have demonstrated that the presence of positive culture from a generator pocket at the time of device replacement (for noninfectious causes) was not a marker for future infection. Currently, there is neither a culture method nor a biological marker to separate generator pocket infection (rare—rates of CIED pocket infection have been reported as low as 0.13% [18]) from colonization (as common as 42% [17]). A study from the Cleveland Clinic suggests that the time to culture positivity may help separate true-positive from false-positive culture results in Propionibacterium-related prosthetic joint infections (5 days vs 9 days, respectively) [19]. Median time to culture positivity in our series was 4 days. Whether this distinguishes infection from contamination would be merely speculative, as there are no studies comparing median time to culture positivity of CIED infections due to Propionibacterium species. The presence of an organism on multiple culture sets might be beneficial in distinguishing infection from a contaminant. Eight patients with pocket infection (n=12) had ≥1 culture set positive for Propionibacterium species (Table 1). Newer techniques such as device ultrasonication have been associated with higher sensitivity for bacteriologic diagnosis of CIED device pocket infection [16]. Using conventional culture methods, the rate of culture-negative CIED pocket infection at our institution between 1991 and 2003 was approximately 7% [11]. Whether the use of ultrasonication or extending the incubation period of culture could have reflected an increase in the incidence of CIED infection due to Propionibacterium species necessitates further research.

Two patients in this series (cases 1 and 3) had CIED-IE. In reviewing the literature, we identified 4 more cases of Propionibacterium CIED–related IE [47]; demographics, device type/status, clinical presentation, and management of reviewed cases are illustrated in Table 3. Common characteristics included the lack of signs of infection at pocket site which were present in 1/6 cases only. In agreement with previous literature, patients with CIED-IE are less likely to have signs of infection at device generator pocket site [20]. Propionibacterium species do not readily grow on blood cultures, even when intracardiac material is involved. In a review of 70 cases of IE caused by Propionibacterium species, 38% of patients had negative blood cultures [2]. The previous factors highlight why diagnosis is difficult and often subject to delay. Time from symptom onset to diagnosis for all identified cases of Propionibacterium CIED-related IE (mean, 74 days [±83]) was twice longer than what is previously described for CIED-IE (mean, 36 days [±117]) [21]. Delay in diagnosis may lead to undesirable complications. This is best demonstrated with the case by Santo et al. [6] the patient had a 4-month diagnosis delay from the first positive blood culture, underwent 3 hospitalizations, and developed a pulmonary embolism before a diagnosis was made. In a review of 522 positive blood cultures for Propionibacterium acnes, 18 (3.5%) had clinically significant BSI [8]. This highlights that not all blood cultures positive for Propionibacterium species are contaminants and BSI should be put into consideration particularly in the presence of an intravascular/intracardiac prosthetic material.

Table 3.

“Cases from reviewed literature” Demographic Features, Device Type/Status, Clinical Presentation, and Management of CIED-IE due to Propionibacterium Species

Case Age/
Gender
Comorbidities Device Total
Device
Procedures
Prior to
Infection
Time To
Infection
From
Placement
(Months)
Symptom
Onset
(Days)
Initial
Presentation
Culture
Results
(Pocket/
Lead/
Blood)
Number of
+BC
(Time to +
Hours)
Treatment/Outcome
(Follow-up Months)
Chua, et al. (4) 78/M Hypothyroidism, hypertension PPM 1 N/A 180 Fever, chills, sweating, fatigue, malaise P•/L+/B+ N/A Complete removal+Ab/Cure
Santo, et al. (6) 48/F Ebstein anomaly PPM 2 96 1st admission: 120
3rd admission: 150
1st admission: fever, malaise, chills
3rd admission: fever, chills, malaise, pleuritic pain
1st admission: P•/L•/B−
3rd admission: P•/L−/B+
1st admission: 1/7 (N/A)
3rd admission: 2/5 (N/A)
1st admission: Ab/Recurrence (3)
3rd admission: Lead removal+Ab/Cure(32)
Noel, et al. (5) 74/M Type 2 DM, hypertension PPM 1 24 15 Fatigue, purpura, delirium P•/L•/B+ 1/6 (93) Complete removal + Ab/Cure (N/A)
Zedtwits-Liebenste in, et al. (7) 31/M Tetralogy of Fallot PPM 3 N/A 2 Fever, murmur P•/L•/B+ ?/5 (N/A) Ab/Cure (12)

Total Device procedures prior to infection: all device-related procedures including previous/initial placement. Device manipulation: includes all invasive device manipulations i.e lead/generator change, devise revision. Ab indicates antibiotics; BC, blood culture; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; IOP, intraoperative purulence; PPM, permanent pacemaker; P, pocket; L, lead; B, blood; +, positive; −, negative; •, N/A;.

Propionibacterium species are susceptible to a wide range of antimicrobial agents. Vancomycin is often used as first-line empiric therapy for CIED infections due its activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci. In a study of 28 Propionibacterium acnes isolates, penicillins and cephalosporins had the lowest MIC values in vitro [22]. The majority of patients in this series received vancomycin, either as monotherapy or in combination. Three patients with penicillin-susceptible strains received vancomycin, which we attributed to delayed culture results.

Current 2010 AHA CIED infection management guidelines [18] recommend aggressive treatment with complete device removal and antibiotic therapy. This recommendation applies to infections limited to the generator pocket as conservative management (antimicrobial therapy without device removal) has shown higher rates of treatment failure and recurrent infections [18]. Duration of antimicrobial therapy should be 10 to 14 days after CIED removal for device pocket infections, and at least 14 days after CIED removal for CIED-BSI. The duration of antibiotic therapy should be extended for at least 4–6 weeks for complicated infections (valve vegetations, or septic emboli) [18]. All cases in this series were treated with complete device removal and antibiotic therapy; all patients with adequate follow-up data were cured, with no infection recurrences at 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

CIED infections due to Propionibacterium species accounted for 2.3% of all device infections over a 25-year period at our institution. The most common infectious syndrome was generator pocket infection. There was an unanticipated predominance of ICDs infection. CIED-IE occurred in only 2 cases. Cure was achieved in all 14 cases with complete device removal and antibiotic therapy. No CIED infection relapses occurred at 6-month follow-up.

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely grateful for the philanthropic support provided by a gift from Eva and Gene Lane (L.M.B.), and two Mayo Named Professorships - the Edward C. Rosenow III, M.D. Professorship in the Art of Medicine (W.R.W.), and the HH Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Professorship in Infectious Diseases Honoring Walter R. Wilson, M.D. (L.M.B.), which were paramount in our work to advance the science of cardiovascular infections, which has been an ongoing focus of investigation at Mayo Clinic for over 60 years.

Footnotes

Financial Disclosures:

Dr. Baddour reports royalty payments (authorship) from UpToDate, Inc. [<$20,000] and Editor-in-Chief payments from Massachusetts Medical Society (Journal Watch Infectious Diseases) [<$20,000]. Dr. Sohail reports receiving funds from TYRX Inc. and Medtronic for prior research unrelated to this study administered according to a sponsored research agreement (SRA) between Mayo Clinic and study sponsor that prospectively defined the scope of the research effort and corresponding budget; and honoraria/consulting fees from Medtronic, Spectranetics. Remaining authors: No disclosures.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors none.

Disclosures: CVD is supported by an NIH Training grant T32 HL007111. Resources of Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS), funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards grant UL1 RR024150), were used for data analysis and manuscript preparation. The study database was created and maintained using REDCap (grant UL1 TR000135).

References

  • 1.Brook I, Frazier EH. Infections caused by Propionibacterium species. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:819–22. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.5.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sohail MR, Gray AL, Baddour LM, Tleyjeh IM, Virk A. Infective endocarditis due to Propionibacterium species. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2009;15:387–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Rispoli DM, Cofield RH. Deep infection after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:306–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chua AG, Ding J, Schoch PE, Cunha BA. Pacemaker-induced endocarditis due to Propionibacterium acnes. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1998;27:1541–1542. doi: 10.1086/517745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Noel W, Hammoudi N, Wegorowska E, D’Alessandro C, Steichen O. Pacemaker endocarditis caused by Propionibacterium acnes: a case report. Heart Lung. 2012;41:e21–3. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Santo KRE, Franceschi V, Campos ACB, Monteiro TS, Barbosa GIF, Dantas A, Lamas CC. Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Propionibacterium acnes in an Adult Patient with Ebstein’s Anomaly: A Report of a Rare Case. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:E222–E225. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zedtwitz-Liebenstein K, Gabriel H, Graninger W. Pacemaker endocarditis due to Propionibacterium acnes. Infection. 2003;31:184–185. doi: 10.1007/s15010-002-2193-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Park HJ, Na S, Park SY, Moon SM, Cho OH, Park KH, Chong YP, et al. Clinical significance of Propionibacterium acnes recovered from blood cultures: analysis of 524 episodes. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1598–601. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01842-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sohail MR, Henrikson CA, Braid-Forbes MJ, Forbes KF, Lerner DJ. Mortality and cost associated with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1821–8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Greenspon AJ, Prutkin JM, Sohail MR, Vikram HR, Baddour LM, Danik SB, Peacock J, et al. Timing of the most recent device procedure influences the clinical outcome of lead-associated endocarditis results of the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:681–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH, Friedman PA, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, et al. Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1851–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG, Jr, Ryan T, Bashore T, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633–8. doi: 10.1086/313753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kanafani ZA, Sexton DJ, Pien BC, Varkey J, Basmania C, Kaye KS. Postoperative joint infections due to Propionibacterium species: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1083–5. doi: 10.1086/605577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zeller V, Ghorbani A, Strady C, Leonard P, Mamoudy P, Desplaces N. Propionibacterium acnes: an agent of prosthetic joint infection and colonization. J Infect. 2007;55:119–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Holmberg A, Lood R, Morgelin M, Soderquist B, Holst E, Collin M, Christensson B, et al. Biofilm formation by Propionibacterium acnes is a characteristic of invasive isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:787–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mason PK, Dimarco JP, Ferguson JD, Mahapatra S, Mangrum JM, Bilchick KC, Moorman JR, et al. Sonication of explanted cardiac rhythm management devices for the diagnosis of pocket infections and asymptomatic bacterial colonization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:143–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02820.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Okada M, Kashiwase K, Hirata A, Nemoto T, Matsuo K, Murakami A, Ueda Y. Bacterial Contamination During Pacemaker Implantation Is Common and Does Not Always Result in Infection. Circ J. 2015;79:1712–8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baddour LM, Epstein AE, Erickson CC, Knight BP, Levison ME, Lockhart PB, Masoudi FA, et al. Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:458–77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Frangiamore SJ, Saleh A, Grosso MJ, Alolabi B, Bauer TW, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Early Versus Late Culture Growth of Propionibacterium acnes in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1149–58. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Le KY, Sohail MR, Friedman PA, Uslan DZ, Cha SS, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, et al. Clinical predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:450–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hickson LJ, Gooden JY, Le KY, Baddour LM, Friedman PA, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, et al. Clinical presentation and outcomes of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:104–10. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crane JK, Hohman DW, Nodzo SR, Duquin TR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolates from shoulder surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3424–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00463-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES