Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Aug 24;11(6):715–720. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0533

Acute Dietary Nitrate Supplementation Increases Maximal Cycling Power in Athletes

Ernest G Rimer 1,2, Linda R Peterson 3,4, Andrew R Coggan 4, James C Martin 1
PMCID: PMC4889556  NIHMSID: NIHMS764516  PMID: 26641379

Abstract

Muscle shortening velocity and hence power has been shown to increase in the presence of nitric oxide (NO). NO availability increases after consuming nitrate (NO3). Ingestion of NO3-rich beetroot juice (BRJ) has increased muscle power in untrained adults.

PURPOSE

This study determined if NO3 supplementation could acutely enhance maximal power in trained athletes.

METHODS

In this double-blind, crossover study, 13 trained athletes performed maximal inertial-load cycling trials (3-4 s) immediately before (PRE) and after (POST) consuming either NO3-rich (NO3) or NO3-depleted (PLA) BRJ to assess acute changes (i.e., within the same day) in maximal power (PMAX) and optimal pedaling rate (RPMOPT). Participants also performed maximal isokinetic cycling (30 s) to assess performance differences after supplementation.

RESULTS

2×2 repeated measures ANOVA indicated a greater increase in PMAX from PRE to POST NO3 (PRE: 1160±301 to POST: 1229±317 W) compared to PLA (PRE: 1191±298 to POST: 1213±300 W) (p=0.009; ή2=0.45). A paired t-test verified a greater relative change in PMAX after NO3 (6.0±2.6%) compared to PLA (2.0±3.8%) (p=0.014; d=1.21). RPMOPT remained unchanged from PRE (123±14) to POST PLA (122±14 rpm) but increased from PRE (120±14) to POST NO3 (127±13 rpm) (p=0.043; ή2=0.30). There was no relative change in RPMOPT after PLA (−0.3±4.1%) but there was an increase after NO3 (6.5±11.4%) (p=0.049; d=0.79). No differences were observed between the 30 s isokinetic trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute NO3 supplementation can enhance maximal muscle power in trained athletes. These findings may particularly benefit power-sports athletes who perform brief explosive actions.

Keywords: Beetroot Juice, Nitric Oxide, Muscle Power, Inertial-Load, Ergogenic Aid

INTRODUCTION

Dietary nitrate (NO3) supplementation enhances aerobic exercise performance by increasing nitric oxide (NO) production via the exogenous NO3-nitrite (NO2)-NO pathway1. The potential benefits and possible underlying mechanisms by which dietary NO3 supplementation affects endurance exercise performance have been recently reviewed2. NO3 ingestion may also affect powerful exercise performance. In fact, chronic supplementation (7 d) of NO3-rich beetroot juice (BRJ) has augmented the rate of force production during electrically evoked isometric knee extension in untrained men3, and, increased total work achieved across multiple cycling sprints performed by recreational team-sport athletes.4

Aside from chronic supplementation, rodent studies5,6,7,8 highlight potential mechanisms by which increased NO availability could acutely increase neuromuscular power (see DISCUSSION). Therefore, NO3 ingestion could acutely increase muscle power in humans. Indeed, Coggan and colleagues reported greater maximal voluntary isokinetic knee extension speed and power in healthy adults9 and even greater increases in heart failure patients10, after a single bolus of concentrated BRJ. Such effects9,10 could potentially benefit athletic populations, but this has not been investigated. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine if NO3-rich BRJ could acutely (i.e., within the same day) increase power and optimal pedaling rate during a short bout of maximal cycling (3-4 s) performed by trained athletes, compared to a NO3-depleted placebo. A secondary purpose was to determine if a potential NO3-mediated increase in maximal power could increase performance during a fatiguing maximal cycling task (30 s).

METHODS

Design

This randomized, double-blind, crossover, repeated-measures design compared 1) acute changes in maximum power and optimal pedaling rate during maximal cycling (3-4 s) performed immediately before and ~2.5 h after consuming concentrated BRJ either rich or depleted in NO3, and 2) differences in performance during a fatiguing isokinetic (120 rpm) cycling trial (30 s) performed only after BRJ supplementation, in trained athletes.

Subjects

After providing written, informed consent, 13 competitively trained athletes from various sports (Table 1) participated in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Utah, in the spirit of the Helsinki Declaration. All participants followed a year-round regimen intended to improve performance in their respective sports and they were free of injury. Participants did not use tobacco products, prescription medication, or dietary supplements intended to increase sports performance.

Table 1.

Athletic background and anthropometric data of participants.

Sport n Competitive Level Age (yrs) Height (cm) Weight (kg)
Tennis ♂=5 NCAA Division I 20.7±1.2 180.8±3.3 72.2±5.0
Alpine Ski ♂=2 NCAA Division I 23.7±0.1 174.0±1.8 75.9±3.2
American Football ♂=1 NCAA Division I 24.1 175.3 78.2
Cycling ♀=2 USA Cycling Category 1 35.7±8.1 171.5±1.8 56.6±2.9
♂=1 USA Cycling Category 4 41.0 182.9 89.1
Triathlon ♂=2 USAT Top 15 (Rocky Mtn) 25.9±5.6 192.4±8.1 79.1±8.3

TOTAL =2
=11
25.9±7.5 180.6±7.5 73.8±10.3

Values are mean±SD.

Note that ♀=female; ♂=male; NCAA=National Collegiate Athletic Association; USAT=USA Triathlon.

Methodology

Figure 1 illustrates the experimental protocol requiring 1 or 3 d of familiarization11 and 2 d of experimentation. On the first visit, anthropometric data were collected and participants were fitted for seat height and cycling shoes, which were held constant during all remaining visits. On the final day of familiarization, participants were instructed to maintain their habitual nutritional and training regime until completion of the study. Each experimental day required at least one night’s rest from regular training activities, or three night’s rest from competition. To insure consistency, both experimental days were scheduled after similar schedules. Participants abstained from antibacterial mouthwash and chewing gum to avoid eradication of oral bacteria that contribute to the NO3-NO2-NO pathway12, and they refrained from alcohol or caffeine ingestion for at least 24 and 6 h, respectively13.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Trained athletes practiced maximal cycling sprints for 1 or 3 d. *Specifically, cyclists require 1 d of familiarization while untrained cyclists (i.e., athletes from other sports) require 3 d of familiarization to reliably produce maximal power on an inertial-load cycle ergometer11. Participants warmed-up for 5 min at 90 rpm and at their self-elected intensity, and then rehearsed four maximal cycling trials (3-4 s). During the final day of familiarization, participants rehearsed a highly-fatiguing maximal cycling trial lasting 30 s on a separate isokinetic cycle ergometer. The beetroot juice (BRJ) supplementation trials occurred across two experimental days. Immediately prior to BRJ supplementation (PRE), participants warmed-up, and then performed four maximal cycling trials. They were then issued either nitrate-rich (NO3) or nitrate-depleted (PLA) BRJ. Participants rested without sleeping, exercising, or eating, but water was permitted, for ~2.5 h and then they repeated the morning protocol to assess acute changes in maximal cycling power after BRJ supplementation (POST), with the addition of a 30 s maximal cycling sprint. **The only difference between experimental days was ingestion of either NO3 or PLA.

Experimental visits were separated by 3-7 d. A minimum washout of 3 d was chosen because elevations in plasma [NO3] and [NO2] after concentrated BRJ approach baseline levels after ~1 d13. On both experimental mornings, participants arrived at approximately the same time (~07:00 h) in a near-fasted state, that is, ~25 min after eating only one large apple. According to previous reports, apples have very low NO3 content (i.e., <20 mg NO3/kg)14. Upon arrival, participants verified compliance with the above-described instructions, then warmed-up and performed four trials of maximal cycling (3-4 s) on an inertial-load cycle ergometer, with a 2 min static recovery between trials. The inertial-load cycling protocol, which has been described previously15, measures maximal cycling power across a range of pedaling rates (e.g., 60–180 rpm) in a single brief trial (Figure 2). Maximal power in each trial was identified as the apex of the power-pedaling rate relationship and has been shown to be highly reliable15—the intra-session coefficient of variation (CV) in this study was 2.1±0.2%. To control for minor fluctuation in the power-pedaling rate relationship, quadratic regression was performed16. The greatest power measured across the four sprints (PMAX) and optimal pedaling rate (RPMOPT; the pedaling rate at which PMAX was achieved)15 was recorded before BRJ consumption (PRE) and used for subsequent analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The inertial-load method measures power (W) across a variety of pedal rates (rpm) in a single maximal cycling effort. Curves drawn with closed and open circles illustrate changes in the power-pedal rate relationships achieved by competitive athletes (n=13) immediately before (PRE) and ~2.5 h after (POST) consuming beetroot juice (BRJ), respectively. Individual data points represent power and corresponding pedal rates of single pedal revolutions occurring immediately before and after the revolution eliciting peak power and optimal pedal rate (enlarged circles) at the apex of each curve. Panels A and B illustrate acute changes in power and pedal rate from PRE to POST after consuming nitrate-depleted (PLA) and nitrate-rich (NO3) BRJ, respectively. Both panels display an upward shift in the power-pedal rate curve from PRE to POST, indicating an acute increase in maximal power after both PLA and NO3 (*p<0.001; ή2=0.83), but NO3 induced a greater rising power (p=0.009; ή2=0.45). The rightward shift in the power-pedal rate curve in panel B indicates that there was an acute increase in optimal pedal rate from PRE to POST NO3 (p=0.043; ή2=0.30). Note: Values are represented as means. SD error bars were removed for clarity.

Immediately after the PRE trials, participants ingested two, 70 mL doses (separated by 30 min) of BRJ (Beet It Sport, James White Drinks Ltd., Ipswich, UK) either with (NO3) or without (PLA) NO3. NO3 contained ~11.2 mmol NO3, and PLA was created by passing NO3 through an ion exchange resin, rendering a drink depleted in NO3 (~0.004 mmol) that was similar in appearance, odor, and taste17. A neutral administrator coded the NO3 and PLA bottles so that neither the investigators nor the participants knew their identities. This strategy allowed random assignment on each experimental day by letting participants choose either pair on the first experimental day, with the other pair used on the second experimental day. The two doses of BRJ were separated by 30 min to help insure that the post-drink cycling sprints (POST) occurred within the 2-3 h window when plasma [NO2] peaks after dietary NO3 supplementation13.

After drinking the first dose of BRJ, participants left the lab for ~2.5 h with instructions to consume the second dose of BRJ 30 min after the first dose, and to abstain from sleep, exercise, food, or drink. Water was allowed ad libitum. Participants were instructed to eat another large apple 25 min before returning, upon which time they verified compliance with the aforementioned instructions. They warmed-up and then initiated the follow-up (i.e., POST) inertial-load sprints153±10 min and 123±10 min (mean±SD) after consuming the first and second doses of BRJ, respectively. PMAX and RPMOPT were recorded for POST, and relative changes in PMAX and RPMOPT from PRE to POST BRJ within the same day were calculated and expressed as percentages:

%ΔPMAX=(POSTPMAXPREPMAX)PREPMAXx100 (Eq1)
%ΔRPMOPT=(POST RPMOPTPRE RPMOPT)PRE RPMOPTx100 (Eq2)

Participants rested for 5 min after the POST sprints, and then performed a maximal cycling trial for 30 s on an isokinetic cycle ergometer, which has been described previously18. Power during the 30 s trial was recorded at 2 Hz using an SRM power meter (Schoberer Rad Messtechnik, Jülich, Germany), which has been shown to provide valid and reliable measures19. Pedaling rate was set to 120 rpm, the approximate RPMOPT achieved at PMAX during pilot testing. To minimize pacing during the 30 s trial, participants were highly encouraged to achieve their within-session PMAX at the onset of the trial, then to continue pedaling maximally for the entire duration in an effort to produce a linear decrease in power over time. Peak power during the 30 s trial was defined as the highest power recorded during any 0.5 s interval (one crank revolution)18. Total work was calculated by summing the incremental work values sampled at each 0.5 s data point (incremental work = sampled power × 1/f)18. Rate of fatigue was expressed as the average percent drop in power per second.

Statistical Analysis

All values are expressed as mean±SD, and analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Because this study was concerned with acute changes in performance from PRE to POST BRJ supplementation during the same day, a 2×2 repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess main effects of time (PRE vs. POST) and treatment (PLA vs. NO3) and their interaction on PMAX and RPMOPT. A paired t-test was used to compare relative changes (%ΔPMAX and %ΔRPMOPT) between PLA and NO3. Paired t-tests also compared peak power, total work, and rate of fatigue during the 30 s trials, which were only performed after PLA and NO3. Partial eta squared (ή2) and effect size (Cohen’s d) was used to determine the magnitude of the effect for significant outcomes (α=0.05) in the ANOVA and t-tests, respectively.

RESULTS

PRE BRJ PMAX was 1191±298 W and 1160±301 W in the PLA and NO3 treatments, respectively. POST BRJ PMAX was 1213±300 W for PLA and 1229±317 W for NO3. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed a main effect for time (PRE vs. POST) (F(1,12)=56.40, p<0.001; ή2=0.83; 1-β=1.0) indicating that PMAX acutely increased from PRE to POST on both experimental days. There was no main effect for treatment (PLA vs. NO3) (F(1,12)=0.34, p=0.571), but there was a significant interaction between time and treatment on PMAX (F(1,12)=9.70, p=0.009; ή2=0.45; 1-β=0.82). Specifically, there was a greater increase in PMAX from PRE to POST NO3 compared to PLA (Figure 2). This observation was verified by the paired t-test, which revealed a greater %ΔPMAX after NO3 (6.0±2.6%) compared to PLA (2.0±3.8%) (p=0.014; d=1.21; 1-β=0.91) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Acute relative changes in maximal power (%ΔPMAX) after consuming concentrated beetroot juice (BRJ) that was either depleted (PLA; open bar) or rich (NO3; closed bar) in dietary nitrate. %ΔPMAX was significantly greater after NO3 compared to PLA (*p=0.014; d=1.21). Note: Values represent mean±SD.

PRE PLA RPMOPT was 123±14 rpm and POST PLA RPMOPT was 122±14 rpm, and PRE and POST NO3 RPMOPT were 120±14 rpm and 127±13, respectively. There was no main effect for time (F(1,12)=2.60, p=0.13) or treatment (F(1,12)=0.22, p=0.651), but there was a significant interaction between time and treatment (F(1,12)=5.13, p=0.043; ή2=0.30; 1-β=0.55). Specifically, RPMOPT did not change from PRE to POST PLA but increased from PRE to POST NO3 (Figure 2), which is consistent with the t-test results for %ΔRPMOPT (PLA: −0.3±4.1% vs. NO3: 6.5±11.4%; p=0.049; d=0.79; 1-β=0.74).

The 30 s isokinetic trials were performed only after BRJ consumption on both days. Maximal effort by the participants was verified by peak powers that were 97.5±4.8% of their within-session PMAX in addition to a linear decrease in power with time (r =-0.99). After BRJ, there was no significant difference in peak power (PLA: 1185±249 W vs. NO3: 1173±255 W; p=0.44), total work (PLA: 23.0±4.4 kJ vs. NO3: 22.8±4.8 kJ; p>0.53), or rate of fatigue (PLA: −2.2±0.4%/s vs. NO3: −2.0±0.2%/s; p=0.22) between days.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study was that dietary NO3 acutely increased PMAX and RPMOPT. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that NO3 ingestion can acutely increase muscle power in trained athletes performing maximal voluntary multi-joint actions. Our findings add to recent reports that dietary NO3 can enhance explosive exercise performance in animal20 and human muscle3,4,9,10. Chronic (7 d) NO3 supplementation has increased rate of muscular force production in mice20 and healthy men3, as well as total cumulative work across several brief cycling sprints performed by recreational athletes4. Hernández and colleagues20 attributed their findings in mice to improved calcium handling, while Haider & Folland3 postulated that their results in men were possibly due to similar mechanisms. According to observations in mice21, Thompson and colleagues4 speculated that their findings were possibly due to an NO-induced increase in O2 delivery to fast-twitch muscle. Adaptations to chronic NO3 supplementation may not apply to the current investigation, however, because changes in PMAX were assessed acutely, from PRE to POST BRJ supplementation in the same day. Therefore, our findings are more consistent with those from Coggan and colleagues, who reported increases in maximal voluntary isokinetic knee extension power in healthy adults9 and heart failure patients10 after consuming a single bolus of NO3.

The exact mechanisms responsible for the acute effect of NO3 ingestion on human muscle power are unknown. Assuming that the observed effects are due to increased NO availability through the exogenous NO3-NO2-NO pathway1, animal studies5,6,7,8 suggest possible mechanisms by which NO may enhance neuromuscular power in people. NO3 ingestion appears to increase blood flow and vascular conductance to fast-twitch rat muscle to a greater extent than slow-twitch muscle21. Increasing blood flow to fast-twitch muscle could increase delivery of circulating NO precursors to the neuromuscular region. There, NO has directly increased the action of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular junction of fast-twitch rat muscle, resulting in greater motor endplate electrical currents5. Indirectly, increased NO availability may acutely enhance neuromuscular power by activating soluble guanylate cyclase, and thus increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate (CGMP). An NO/CGMP-dependent mechanism has been shown to augment excitability of trigeminal motorneurons (responsible for actions of the jaw) in guinea pigs6, and to increase maximal shortening velocity and hence maximal power of fast-twitch rodent muscle7,8. To date, no research has investigated the neural or contractile mechanisms by which dietary NO3 supplementation may acutely enhance neuromuscular power in humans. Based on the aforementioned animal studies5,6,7,8,21, it is possible that there is increased action of NO in fast-twitch muscle. If this were true in humans, then individuals with more fast-twitch muscle (i.e., power-sports athletes) may particularly benefit from NO3 ingestion. Interestingly, elite power-sports athletes appear to be more genetically endowed to produce endogenous NO than elite endurance athletes22. This hypothesis must be considered with extreme caution because no research has tested it, and because post-hoc analysis revealed no apparent differences in %ΔPMAX (p=0.53) or %ΔRPMOPT (p=0.54) between the endurance and power-sports athletes in this study.

The notion that NO can acutely increase muscle shortening velocity through a NO/CGMP-dependent mechanism7,8 is consistent with the 6.5% increase in RPMOPT observed in this study. Pedal speed (crank angular velocity × crank length) has been shown to highly correlate with joint angular velocity at the knee and hip and thus likely provides a surrogate measure for shortening velocity of mono-articular muscles spanning those joints23,24. Additionally, pedaling rate (cycle frequency) influences maximal power by limiting the time for muscle excitation and relaxation24. Increases in muscle shortening velocity directly affect muscular power because by definition, power is the product of force and velocity. As such, the observed increase in RPMOPT after NO3 could explain most, if not all, of the observed increase in PMAX, suggesting why maximal force (measured by cycling torque) remained unchanged (post-hoc analysis: p=0.40).

Both PMAX and RPMOPT acutely increased after NO3. Interestingly, there was a 2% increase in PMAX after PLA. This increase was possibly due to an expected diurnal rhythm in maximal power, which correlates closely with the circadian variation in core body temperature. In particular, Lericollais and colleagues reported an 8.2% increase in peak power of highly trained competitive cyclists from 06:00 h to 18:00 h, an average increase of ~0.7%/h25. At this rate, we might expect an increase in power of ~1.8% in the current study from PRE (~07:00 h) to POST (~09:30 h). This may explain, in part, the 2% increase in power we observed after PLA, in addition to contributing to the 6% increase in PMAX after NO3.

Accounting for the plausibility of a diurnal rhythm contributing up to a 2% increase in PMAX after both PLA and NO3, the acute 6% increase in PMAX after NO3 may not be as large as observed (i.e., up to ~4.0%). Further, the acute 6% increase in PMAX observed in this study is likely not as large as the ~6% and ~13% increases in isokinetic (6.28 rad/s) knee extension power observed in healthy adults9 and heart failure patients10, respectively. Coggan and colleagues9,10, however, might have observed even larger effects if testing occurred immediately before and then after NO3 supplementation. The current study assessed acute changes in maximal power from PRE to POST NO3 ingestion in the same day. Thus, by using a highly reproducible method (CV=2.1±0.2% in the current study) and by accounting for day-to-day variations in power via a within-day control trial (i.e., PRE), we were able to detect statistically significant changes in maximal power that otherwise might have been overlooked. This interpretation is supported by the fact that post-hoc analysis revealed no difference in PMAX between POST PLA and POST NO3 (p=0.31). Although trained athletes may not experience similar increases in power from dietary NO3 as untrained healthy adults9 or disease patients10, the large effect sizes for %ΔPMAX (d=1.21) and %ΔRPMOPT (d=0.79) indicate that the current findings may have practical significance. The current findings may particularly benefit power-sports athletes, especially those who depend on brief (i.e., ≤4 s) explosive actions (e.g., accelerating, jumping, throwing, etc.).

It is important to note that our primary finding, that NO availability augments neuromuscular power, diverges from previous studies that investigated the effects of acute dietary NO3 supplementation on the energetics and fatigue resistance of “sprint-type” exercise. One study26 assessed if a single dose of dietary NO3 could improve performance across repeated kayak sprints (5 × 10 s, w/50 s rest between each sprint). In that study, trained kayakers performed a 15 min aerobic exercise trial immediately prior to performing repeated sprints, which may have prevented achievement of maximal power due to residual fatigue. In fact, the highest reported powers achieved by the participants did not occur until the final 10 s sprints26, which further suggests residual fatigue during the sprints—when repeated sprint protocols are initiated without fatigue, the first sprint is usually the one eliciting maximal power27. Another study28 assessed the acute effect of NO3 ingestion on performance during repeated 8 s cycling sprints. Team sport athletes commenced the repeated sprint protocol in a non-fatigued state, but the authors did not report sprint-by-sprint peak or average powers because they were interested in how NO3 supplementation affected performance and fatigue across all sprints28. In contrast, the present study focused on the acute effect of NO3 ingestion on maximal power in a non-fatigued state. The effects of acute and chronic NO3 supplementation on fatiguing high-intensity exercise performance have been well documented2, but more research is needed to further assess how NO3 ingestion affects brief, maximal exercise without fatigue.

In contrast to the acute increases in PMAX and RPMOPT discussed above, however, we did not observe any differences in performance between NO3 and PLA during the fatiguing 30 s trials. Therefore, our findings are consistent with both of the aforementioned studies26,28 and others9,29 who have reported no performance changes in maximal effort, highly-fatiguing exercise performed on separate days after acute NO3 ingestion. It is possible that we did not see any differences in performance during the 30 s cycling effort after NO3 because a baseline test was not performed before supplementation. If PMAX improved by ~6% from PRE to POST, a similar improvement in peak power at the onset of the 30 s trial might have contributed to greater acute change in work, and thus greater performance across the trial, particularly if the rate of fatigue remained unchanged. Further research is suggested to test this hypothesis. Another possible explanation may be that the 30 s sprint was performed on an isokinetic ergometer. In other words, if NO availability increases muscle shortening velocity7,8 without affecting maximal force production3,29,30, then increases in power may not have been possible because the constant pedal speed (i.e., 120 rpm) would have also maintained a constant muscle shortening velocity23,24.

An important limitation of this study was that baseline PMAX before NO3 was ~2.6% less than before PLA. Although a post-hoc dependent t-test revealed that this difference was not significant (p=0.07; d=-0.10), a coincidental difference is not impossible. Day-to-day fluctuations in maximal power using inertial-load cycling31 and other methods of power assessment32 are expected among actively training and competing athletes. Our repeated measures design accounted for these individual fluctuations by having each subject serve as his or her own control, while the double-blind crossover procedures insured that neither the researchers nor participants knew which doses (i.e., PLA or NO3) were consumed on either day. Therefore, we are confident in our findings and conclude that dietary NO3 supplementation can acutely increase maximal power of competitively trained athletes. Finally, we did not assess changes in plasma [NO3], [NO2], or other NO biomarkers (e.g., breath NO or muscle [CGMP]) before or after NO3 and PLA. Doing so would have allowed us to determine if there was a relationship between changes in NO biomarkers and changes in performance9. Despite this limitation, previous work has indicated significant increases in [NO3], [NO3], and in breath NO within 2-4 h of consuming the same BRJ product as in the current study9,10,13.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Dietary NO3 supplementation using concentrated BRJ can acutely increase maximal power and contractile speed of trained athletes performing multi-joint concentric actions. Replication of this study should consider the diurnal rhythm in muscle power while exploring the neuromuscular mechanisms that could explain the current and previous9,10 findings. One promising aspect of this study was that the observed effects occurred within the context of our participants’ usual environment, that is, they did not modify their habitual diets, training, or competition schedules. As such, measuring performance immediately before supplementation is a promising strategy for future research investigating how NO3 acutely affects performance among athletes, a population in whom benefits have not always been observed. Use of a within-day control would also aid future efforts to determine if acute NO3-induced increases in power may transfer to brief explosive actions such as sprinting, jumping, agility, throwing, kicking, and striking. Because this study used a “motley crew” of athletes, future research could also explore how dietary NO3 can increase power in athletes from different types of sports (i.e., endurance-sports vs. power-sports), age-ranges, or with different muscle fiber distributions (i.e., slow-twitch vs. fast-twitch muscle). Nevertheless, trained power-sports athletes may particularly benefit by ingesting NO3 ~2-3 h before training, practice, or competition.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation and Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grant UL1 TR000448 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH. I (EGR) would like to thank my wife Alyssa F. Rimer (Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT) for managing the double-blind procedures, and for helping me keep this study under my thumb when I tried to let it be.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT. The nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2008;7:156–167. doi: 10.1038/nrd2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones AM. Dietary nitrate supplementation and exercise performance. Sports Med. 2014;44:35–45. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0149-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haider G, Folland JP. Nitrate supplementation enhances the contractile properties of human skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:2234–2243. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thompson C, Wylie LJ, Fulford J, Kelly J, Black MI, McDonagh STJ, Jeukendrup AE, Vanhatalo A, Jones AM. Dietary nitrate improves sprint performance and cognitive function during prolonged intermittent exercise. EJAP. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3166-0. 10.1007/s00421-015-3166-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Petrov KA, Malomouzh AI, Kovyazina IV, Krejci E, Nikitashina AD, Proskurina SE, Zobov VV, Nikolsky EE. Regulation of acetylcholinesterase activity by nitric oxide in rat neuromuscular junction via N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor activation. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37:181–189. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abudara V, Alvarez AF, Chase MH, Morales FR. Nitric oxide as an anterograde neurotransmitter in the trigeminal motor pool. Journal of neurophysiology. 2002;88:497–506. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.1.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maréchal G, Beckers-Bleukx G. Effect of nitric oxide on the maximal velocity of shortening of a mouse skeletal muscle. Pflügers Arch. 1998;436:906–913. doi: 10.1007/s004240050722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maréchal G, Gailly P. Effects of nitric oxide on the contraction of skeletal muscle. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;55:1088–1102. doi: 10.1007/s000180050359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coggan AR, Leibowitz JL, Kadkhodayan A, Thomas DP, Ramamurthy S, Spearie CA, Waller S, Farmer M, Peterson LR. Effect of acute dietary nitrate intake on maximal knee extensor speed and power in healthy men and women. Nitric Oxide. 2015;48:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2014.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coggan AR, Leibowitz JL, Anderson Spearie C, Kadkhodayan A, Thomas DP, Ramamurthy S, Mahmood K, Park S, Waller S, Farmer M, Peterson LR. Acute dietary nitrate intake improves muscle contractile function in patients with heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:914–920. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martin JC, Diedrich D, Coyle EF. Time course of learning to produce maximal cycling power. Int J of Sports Med. 2000b;21:485–487. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7415. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Govoni M, Jansson EÅ, Weitzberg E, Lundberg JO. The increase in plasma nitrite after a dietary nitrate load is markedly attenuated by an antibacterial mouthwash. Nitric Oxide. 2008;19:333–337. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wylie LJ, Kelly J, Bailey SJ, Blackwell JR, Skiba PF, Winward PG, Jeukendrup AE, Vanhatalo A, Jones AJ. Beetroot juice and exercise: pharmacodynamic and dose-response relationships. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115:325–336. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00372.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reinik M, Tamme T, Roasto M. Naturally occurring nitrates and nitrites in foods. In: Gilbert J, Senyuva HZ, editors. Bioactive Compounds in Foods. 1990. pp. 225–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martin JC, Wagner BM, Coyle EF. Inertial-load method determines maximal cycling power in a single exercise bout. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:1505–1512. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199711000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A. Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1981;51:1175–1182. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.51.5.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lansley KE, Winyard PG, Fulford J, Vanhatalo A, Bailey SJ, Blackwell JR, DiMenna FJ, Gilchrist M, Benjamin N, Jones AM. Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces the O2 cost of walking and running: a placebo-controlled study. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:591–600. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tomas A, Ross EZ, Martin JC. Fatigue during maximal sprint cycling: unique role of cumulative contraction cycles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1364–1369. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cae2ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gardner AS, Stephens S, Martin DT, Lawton E, Lee H, Jenkins D. Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1252–1258. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000132380.21785.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hernández A, Schiffer TA, Ivarsson N, Cheng AJ, Bruton JD, Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Westerblad H. Dietary nitrate increases tetanic [Ca2+] i and contractile force in mouse fast- twitch muscle. J Physiol. 2012;590:3575–3583. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.232777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ferguson SK, Hirai DM, Copp SW, Holdsworth CT, Allen JD, Jones AM, Musch TI, Poole DC. Impact of dietary nitrate supplementation via beetroot juice on exercising muscle vascular control in rats. J Physiol. 2013;591:547–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.243121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gómez-Gallego F, Ruiz JR, Buxens A, Artieda M, Arteta D, Santiago C, Rodriquez-Romo G, Lao JI, Lucia A. The– 786 T/C polymorphism of the NOS3 gene is associated with elite performance in power sports. EJAP. 2009;107:565–569. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1166-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yoshihuku Y, Herzog W. Optimal design parameters of the bicycle-rider system for maximal muscle power output. J Biomech. 1990;23:1069–1079. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90322-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin JC, Brown NA, Anderson FC, Spirduso WW. A governing relationship for repetitive muscular contraction. J Biomech. 2000;33:969–974. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lericollais R, Gauthier A, Bessot N, Sesboüé B, Davenne D. Time-of-day effects on fatigue during a sustained anaerobic test in well-trained cyclists. Chronobiology Int. 2009;26:1622–1635. doi: 10.3109/07420520903534492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Muggeridge DJ, Howe CC, Spendiff O, Pedlar C, James PE, Easton C. The effects of a single dose of concentrated beetroot juice on performance in trained flatwater kayakers. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2013;23(5):498–506. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.23.5.498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D. Repeated-Sprint Ability—Part I. Sports Med. 2011;41:673–694. doi: 10.2165/11590550-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martin K, Smee D, Thompson KG, Rattray B. Dietary Nitrate Does Not Improve Repeated Sprint Performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;3:845–850. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0384. 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fulford J, Winyard PG, Vanhatalo A, Bailey SJ, Blackwell JR, Jones AM. Influence of dietary nitrate supplementation on human skeletal muscle metabolism and force production during maximum voluntary contractions. Pflügers Arch. 2013;465:517–528. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1220-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hoon MW, Fornusek C, Chapman PG, Johnson NA. The effect of nitrate supplementation on muscle contraction in healthy adults. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015 doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1053418. 10.1080/17461391.2015.1053418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McLean BD, Petrucelli C, Coyle EF. Maximal power output and perceptual fatigue responses during a Division I female collegiate soccer season. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:3189–3196. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318273666e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cormack SJ, Newton RU, McGuigan MR, Cormie P. Neuromuscular and endocrine responses of elite players during an Australian rules football season. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008a;3:439–453. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.3.4.439. 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES