Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2016 May 26;2016:1794240. doi: 10.1155/2016/1794240

Advances in Confocal Microscopy of the Eye

Paolo Fogagnolo 1,*, Michele Iester 2, Hong Liang 3, Dipika V Patel 4
PMCID: PMC4889803  PMID: 27298821

This special issue focuses on the recent advances on in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), a technique used to investigate eye structures at the cellular level without tissue damage.

In 1985 Lemp and coworkers were the first to study ex vivo corneas by confocal microscopy and to suggest a possible in vivo use [1]. In the early 1990s, the groups directed by Cavanagh and Kaufman published the first IVCM in humans; thereafter the scientific interest in ocular IVCM rapidly increased. In the last decade, IVCM progressively gained a relevant role in the clinical setting, being of help in the diagnosis and management of a number of conditions such as toxicity induced by preservatives [2, 3] and different eye treatments [4, 5], iatrogenic damage [6], infections [7], and dystrophies [8], pathology of the conjunctiva [911] and limbus [12], ocular surface tumors [13], and corneal deposits [14, 15].

IVCM is a valuable tool for enhancing our understanding of anterior segment physiology and pathology, as pointed out by Dr. V. Fasanella et al. in their paper investigating meibomian gland changes occurring with aging and a number of ocular surface diseases.

Examples of the usefulness of IVCM in detecting early corneal changes can be found in the paper by Dr. D. Wang et al., who highlighted that a higher-than-normal immune activity may be observed in a subgroup of patients with clear corneal grafts in the absence of any other clinical signs. Dr. P. Song et al. studied the confocal and histopathological features of the stromal scar in keratoconus and suggested that IVCM is capable of detecting subtle keratocyte activation associated with fibrosis.

In recent years, IVCM has become increasingly useful in evaluating corneal innervation (which is of key importance in regulating ocular surface homeostasis) [16] and corneal immune and inflammatory responses [17]. In this special issue, three papers explored the changes occurring in corneal innervation in both local and systemic diseases. The paper by Dr. E. F. Wang et al. reviewed the impact of various systemic diseases on corneal innervation and discussed the potential use of IVCM as a noninvasive marker of peripheral neuropathy. The reports by Dr. R. Shetty et al. and Dr. N. K. Pahuja et al. investigated nerve changes occurring, respectively, in dry eye disease and keratoconus.

Finally, IVCM plays a role in studying the therapeutic effects of topical eye treatments, as shown in this issue by the paper of Dr. A. M. Fea et al.

This special issue provides a useful update on the advances in the rapidly evolving field of IVCM and highlights the contribution of this technology to our understanding of the anterior segment in health and disease.

Paolo Fogagnolo
Michele Iester
Hong Liang
Dipika V. Patel

References

  • 1.Lemp M. A., Dilly P. N., Boyde A. Tandem-scanning (confocal) microscopy of the full-thickness cornea. Cornea. 1985;4(4):205–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Iester M., Oddone F., Fogagnolo P., Frezzotti P., Figus M. Changes in the morphological and functional patterns of the ocular surface in patients treated with prostaglandin analogues after the use of TSP 0.5%® preservative-free eyedrops: a prospective, multicenter study. Ophthalmic Research. 2014;51(3):146–152. doi: 10.1159/000357100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iester M., Telani S., Frezzotti P., et al. Ocular surface changes in glaucomatous patients treated with and without preservatives beta-blockers. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2014;30(6):476–481. doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fogagnolo P., Dipinto A., Vanzulli E., et al. A 1-year randomized study of the clinical and confocal effects of tafluprost and latanoprost in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients. Advances in Therapy. 2015;32(4):356–369. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0205-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fogagnolo P., Sacchi M., Ceresara G., et al. The effects of topical coenzyme Q10 and vitamin e d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate after cataract surgery: a clinical and in vivo confocal study. Ophthalmologica. 2013;229(1):26–31. doi: 10.1159/000342196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Cillà S., Fogagnolo P., Sacchi M., et al. Corneal involvement in uneventful cataract surgery: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmologica. 2014;231(2):103–110. doi: 10.1159/000355490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Randon M., Liang H., El Hamdaoui M., et al. In vivo confocal microscopy as a novel and reliable tool for the diagnosis of Demodex eyelid infestation. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;99(3):336–341. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel D. V., Grupcheva C. N., McGhee C. N. J. Imaging the microstructural abnormalities of Meesmann corneal dystrophy by in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2005;24(6):669–673. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000154389.51125.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frezzotti P., Fogagnolo P., Haka G., et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of conjunctiva in preservative-free timolol 0.1% gel formulation therapy for glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2014;92(2):e133–e140. doi: 10.1111/aos.12261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Labbé A., Dupas B., Hamard P., Baudouin C. In vivo confocal microscopy study of blebs after filtering surgery. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(11, article 1979) doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Labbé A., Gheck L., Iordanidou V., Mehanna C., Brignole-Baudouin F., Baudouin C. An in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology evaluation of pterygium activity. Cornea. 2010;29(4):392–399. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181bd44ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patel D. V., Sherwin T., McGhee C. N. J. Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy of the normal human corneoscleral limbus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47(7):2823–2827. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gabison E. E., Labbé A., Brignole-Baudouin F., et al. Confocal biomicroscopy of corneal intraepithelial neoplasia regression following interferon alpha 2b treatment. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;94(1):134–135. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.143859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ceresara G., Fogagnolo P., De Cillà S., et al. Corneal involvement in crohn's disease: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Cornea. 2011;30(2):136–142. doi: 10.1097/ico.0b013e3181e9ac98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ceresara G., Fogagnolo P., Zuin M., Zatelli S., Bovet J., Rossetti L. Study of corneal copper deposits in wilson's disease by in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmologica. 2014;231(3):147–152. doi: 10.1159/000355090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Allgeier S., Zhivov A., Eberle F., et al. Image reconstruction of the subbasal nerve plexus with in vivo confocal microscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(9):5022–5028. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mayer W. J., Mackert M. J., Kranebitter N., et al. Distribution of antigen presenting cells in the human cornea: correlation of in vivo confocal microscopy and immunohistochemistry in different pathologic entities. Current Eye Research. 2012;37(11):1012–1018. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.696172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES