Skip to main content
International Immunology logoLink to International Immunology
. 2016 Feb 8;28(4):155–161. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxw002

Genetics of autoimmune diseases: perspectives from genome-wide association studies

Yuta Kochi 1,
PMCID: PMC4889885  PMID: 26857735

Genetics of autoimmune diseases

Keywords: autoimmune disease, expression quantitative trait locus, genome-wide association study

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for autoimmune diseases (ADs) have identified many risk loci and have provided insights into the etiology of each disease. Some of these loci, such as PTPN22, IL23R and STAT4, are shared among different ADs, and the combination of risk loci may determine an individual’s susceptibility for a disease. The majority of GWAS loci are expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), where disease-causing variants regulate expression of neighboring (or sometimes distant) genes. Because the eQTL effects are often cell type-specific, the incorporation of epigenetic data from disease-related cell types and tissues is expected to refine the identification of causal variants. The cumulative eQTL effects in multiple genes may influence the activity or fate of immune cells, which in turn may affect the function of the immune system in individuals. In this paper, I review the etiology of ADs by focusing on important immune cells (Th1 cells, Th17 cells and regulatory T cells), important pathways (antigen-receptor signaling and type I interferon signaling) and relevant genes identified in GWASs.

Introduction

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) include approximately 80 different disorders affecting ~3–5% of the population (1, 2). It is well accepted that a disease can be classified as autoimmune if one shows that an immune response to a self-antigen causes the disease pathology. ADs manifest a wide variability in terms of targeted tissue(s), sharing the contributions of both cellular and humoral immune responses to tissue injury. Like other complex traits, most ADs are multifactorial, where both genetic and environmental factors are involved in their etiology.

Since genome-wide association study (GWAS) has become a standard approach to the identification of susceptibility genes for complex traits, the genetic risk factors in the development of ADs have been increasingly discovered in the past decade. Furthermore, multi-ethnic meta-analysis of GWASs has been performed for some ADs such as rheumatoid arthritis (3), multiple sclerosis (4) and inflammatory bowel disease (5), where over 100 loci were identified for individual ADs. As a proportion of those loci is shared between different diseases, combinations of genetic factors may determine the phenotype (disease) of individuals. Herein, I review findings from GWASs for ADs, with special focus on important genes and pathways shared among ADs (Table 1). It should be noted that, in some of those genes, the effect of the same variant is opposite among different ADs (e.g. PTPN22 and IFIH1 genes). Moreover, the disease-associated variants are at times different among different ADs, possibly owing to the presence of multiple disease-causing variants in the locus (e.g. the IL23RIL12RB2 region) and/or the difference in haplotype structure among different ancestral populations studied.

Table 1.

Summary of AD risk loci identified by GWAS

Genes Relevant cells/signaling pathways eQTL effect (risk allelea) Missense variant effect (risk alleleb) RA SLE SSc SS PBC T1D ATD Celiac MS IBD AS PS Behçet
PTPN22 BCR/TCR R620W Gain? c
BLK BCR Down
STAT3 Th17 Up
STAT4 Th1/Type I IFN Up
IL12A Th1 Up
IL12RB2 Th1 Up
IL12RB2-IL23R Th1/Th17 ?
IL23R Th17 R381Q Gain
CCR6 Th17/Treg Up
IL2RA Treg Down
IL10 Treg Up
CTLA4 Treg Down (Splicing QTL)
FCRL3 BCR/Treg Up
IRF5 Type I IFN Up
IFIH1 Type I IFN A946T Gain

Black circles indicate association identified by GWAS with up-regulated gene expression or gain-of-function in the risk allele, whereas the white circles indicate that with down-regulated expression or loss-of-function in the risk allele. The white triangles indicate GWAS association but its allelic effect on gene expression is unclear. AS, ankylosing spondylitis; ATD, autoimmune thyroid disease; BCR, B-cell receptor; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IFN, interferon; MS, multiple sclerosis; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; PS, psoriasis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SS, Sjögren’s syndrome; SSc, systemic sclerosis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; T1D, type 1 diabetes; TCR, T-cell receptor.

aThe risk allele is for the majority of ADs associated. ‘Down’ indicates the gene expression is down-regulated in the risk allele, whereas ‘Up’ indicates that is up-regulated.

bThe amino acid change for the risk allele is underlined.

cGWAS association and its eQTL effect were reviewed by using web databases such as ImmunoBase (www.immunobase.org/) and HaploReg (www.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/).

GWASs and expression quantitative trait loci studies

A GWAS usually screens 500000 to 1000000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by comparing the allele/genotype frequency between subjects affected by disease and those not affected. Although a GWAS can identify disease risk loci, further analysis is required to determine the responsible genes or disease-causing variants in the loci.

Coding and regulatory variants are known to be enriched in the GWAS loci of complex diseases; such variants can affect the function of genes qualitatively and/or quantitatively. Recent in silico analysis that examined functional categories of disease-associated SNPs in 11 common diseases including 6 ADs showed that coding variants explained <10% of heritability in complex diseases, whereas DNase I hypersensitivity sites (DHSs; these indicate transcriptional activity of loci) from multiple cell types, especially enhancer DHSs and cell-type-specific DHSs, explained approximately 80% of heritability (6). Although those DHSs may be also involved in the transcription of non-coding RNAs such as lncRNA, these results may suggest that the majority of disease-causing variants in complex diseases, including ADs, may be regulatory variants that affect gene expression, which we now term expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). In fact, 44% of rheumatoid arthritis risk loci are detected as eQTLs in peripheral blood cells (3). This pattern is also the case for other ADs (7–9), indicating that the cumulative effects of quantitative differences in risk genes lead to the onset of AD.

Although the DNA sequence variations are shared among the cell types and tissues in an individual, the regulatory effect of variants (the eQTL effect) would be different between cell types and tissues. Therefore, to analyze the causal mechanism of complex traits, cell-type-specific eQTL analyses are needed. To this end, several eQTL studies such as the ImmVar project (10) and the GTEx project (11) are being performed.

In addition, recent human epigenome projects, such as the ENCODE project (12) and the RoadMap epigenomic project (13), provide clues that may clarify the mechanism of cell-specific eQTL effects. By combining epigenome and transcriptome data, genomic regulatory elements can be comprehensively revealed in individual cell types. A recent study proposed a fine-mapping algorithm to identify candidate causal variants by integrating the GWAS data from 21 ADs with those epigenomic and transcriptomic data (14). This study demonstrated that 60% of causal SNPs in ADs mapped to immune-cell enhancers, represented by the H3K27ac histone marker. In addition, causal variants likely occur near the binding sites of super-enhancers, which are characterized by clusters of regulatory elements bound with very high amounts of transcription factors and especially important for genes associated with determining cell identity (15, 16).

The MHC and antigen presentation

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) locus is also known as the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus and is located on human chromosome 6. In the context of ADs, the MHC was the subject of intensive investigation even before the era of GWASs and is believed to play a central role in the genetic predisposition to AD. In fact, the ‘Manhattan plot’ of GWASs, which can display the results of association tests in a single figure, visually confirms that the MHC locus is the major determinant in most ADs (17). Because the classical MHC genes HLA-A/B/C and HLA-DP/DQ/DR play an essential role in antigen presentation in adaptive immune responses, it is reasonable to suggest that these genes also have critical roles in the autoimmune response in AD. The specific genes and alleles that are associated with individual diseases differ. For instance, in ankylosing spondylitis, a single allele of HLA-B27 accounts for approximately half of disease susceptibility (18), whereas multiple HLA-DRB1 alleles such as *01:01, *04:01, *04:05 and *09:01 are associated with the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (19).

Technical advances in statistical genetics have made it possible to identify the AD-relevant alleles of all classical HLA genes by imputation analysis using SNP array data. This analysis reveals the roles of individual amino-acid-encoding sequences of all classical HLA genes. In rheumatoid arthritis, the shared epitope of HLA-DRB1 at amino acid positions 70–74 has long been believed to be responsible for the disease (20), but the new amino-acid-based association analysis revealed that the amino acid at residue 11 is also crucial (21). In addition, single-amino-acid polymorphisms in HLA-B (at position 9) and HLA-DPB1 (at position 9), which are both located in peptide-binding grooves, are also associated with rheumatoid arthritis risk independently of HLA-DRB1. Furthermore, a recent study of patients with auto-antibodies for anti-citrullinated proteins identified additional association in HLA-A (at position 77) (22).

Involvement of multiple alleles in multiple MHC genes also is seen in other ADs such as type 1 diabetes (23, 24), multiple sclerosis (25) and Graves’ disease (26), implying that multiple autoantigen–MHC allele pairs are involved in the etiology of a single disease. However, because the patients have heterogeneous etiology (even if the same disease is diagnosed), whether these multiple autoantigen–MHC allele pairs are also involved in an individual patient has yet to be clarified.

TCR and BCR signaling

The strength of antigen-receptor signaling is crucial in determining the fate of clones in both T cells and B cells. In several murine models of ADs such as SKG arthritic mice (27) and NZM2410 lupus mice (28), a reduction in antigen-receptor signaling because of mutations in genes involved in antigen-receptor signaling leads to a failure to delete autoreactive cells.

In human ADs, the most important and best-studied genetic factor is PTPN22, which encodes the phosphatase Lyp (lymphoid-specific tyrosine phosphatase) (29). In human primary cells, both TCR and BCR signaling are attenuated in Lyp620W carriers, which may suggest that the phosphatase activity of Lyp620W is enhanced compared with the non-risk Lyp620R protein (30, 31). In fact, the amino acid change of 620W leads to interference with the physical association between Lyp and c-Src kinase (Csk), resulting in increased phosphatase activity of Lyp620W (31, 32). This indicates Lyp620W is a gain-of-function variant in human lymphocytes. The findings in the mouse are more complicated. Ptpn22 knock-out (KO) mice and Ptpn22-619W (a mutant analogous to the human variant) knock-in (KI) mice show similar phenotypes, including an enlarged spleen and thymus, an expanded population of memory/effector T cells and a lymphocyte hyper-responsiveness, suggesting that Ptpn22-619W is a loss-of-function variant (33). Of note, the murine variant protein exhibited reduced stability because of enhanced calpain-mediated degradation, which may be the mechanism of functional loss (33). However, whether this observation is also the case for the human protein is controversial and will require further validation (33, 34). The differences between mouse and human studies and underlying potential models for disease-causing mechanism for PTPN22 are reviewed in detail in several excellent articles elsewhere (35, 36).

Polymorphism in CSK, which physically interacts with Lyp, is also reported to be associated with the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (37). In combination with Lyp, Csk can modify the activation state in lymphocytes of downstream Src kinases such as Lyn in the human B cells (37). The risk allele of CSK is associated with increased expression and augments inhibitory phosphorylation of Lyn. Carriers of the risk allele exhibit increased BCR-mediated activation of mature B cells, as well as higher concentrations of plasma IgM. Moreover, the fraction of transitional B cells in these patients is increased because of an expansion of late-transitional cells in a stage targeted by selection mechanisms.

Recently, another interesting mechanism of BCR-mediated autoimmunity was suggested by the analysis of the BLK gene, which is associated with rheumatoid arthritis, SLE and other autoimmune conditions (38, 39). BLK encodes B lymphocyte kinase, a member of the Src family of kinases, and a risk haplotype is associated with reduced expression in B cells. Blk phosphorylates tyrosine residues in the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) of the BCR (40). As expected, the phosphorylation of downstream molecules such as PLCγ2 and SHP-2 was shown to be decreased in the carriers harboring the BLK risk haplotype. However, after BCR cross-linking, B cells from these individuals can be hyperactivated, exhibiting enhanced phosphorylation of these molecules, as well as up-regulation of CD86; the latter may relate to enhanced potential for T-cell activation by B cells. In addition, the number of isotype-switched memory B cells was increased in the risk-allele carriers (38). These lines of evidence imply that thresholds for BCR signaling are lowered with a reduced function of BLK, leading to autoimmunity.

The observations in PTPN22, CSK and BLK suggest that the increased susceptibility to AD reflects modulation of antigen-receptor signaling resulting from either enhancement or reduction of the signal at multiple maturation and activation points in lymphocytes. Therefore, careful interpretation is needed to understand the mechanism of T- and B-cell abnormalities caused by these genetic variants.

Th1 and Th17 cells

CD4+ T cells are critical players in host defense, as well as in autoimmunity. In the context of autoimmune conditions, Th1 and Th17 cells, characterized by the production (respectively) of IFN-γ and IL-17, are thought to be the main pathogenic players, although their roles in individual diseases may be different. The importance of genetic factors regulating Th1 and Th17 cells in AD is evident from the fact that GWAS SNPs of ADs are highly enriched for CD4+ T-cell super-enhancers (41).

Among the cytokine and cytokine-receptor genes that regulate the differentiation of helper T cells, the missense variant (R381Q) in IL23R, encoding the receptor molecule for IL-23, may have been the best studied of AD-associated alleles. This variant has been associated with multiple ADs, including inflammatory bowel disease (42), psoriasis (43) and ankylosing spondylitis (44). Reduced phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) upon stimulation with IL-23 and decreased production of IL-17 were observed in human CD4+ T cells carrying the R381Q protective allele (45). This result suggests that reduced responsiveness in Th17 cells protects against those ADs. Interestingly, this missense variant is rare in Asian populations, and an independent association signal in the intergenic region of IL23R–IL12RB2 was observed in patients with Behçet’s disease (46, 47).

The IL12RB2 gene, which encodes a subunit of the IL-12 receptor, is essential in the differentiation of Th1 cells, and thus is another candidate gene in this locus. Although the gene responsible for Behçet’s disease has yet to be determined, the intergenic variant is inferred to have cis-eQTL effects on both genes (48). Moreover, the IL12RB2 locus showed an association signal independent from that of the IL23R locus in primary biliary cirrhosis and systemic sclerosis in European populations (49, 50). Association with the IL12A locus was also reported for these two diseases (49, 51), suggesting that the IL-12-driven Th1 response may be essential in those ADs.

Another example of differential roles of Th1 and Th17 cells in AD is suggested by the associations observed between ADs and the STAT genes STAT3 and STAT4. STAT3, which transduces signals from cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-23, plays an important role in the differentiation of Th17 cells. The STAT3 locus exhibits associations with multiple ADs, including multiple sclerosis (52), inflammatory bowel diseases (5, 53) and psoriasis (54). Although the disease-causing mechanism for this locus remains unclear, a potential cis-eQTL effect was observed in this locus, with up-regulated gene expression in the risk allele (11, 55).

An association with the STAT4 locus has also been reported for multiple ADs, including rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (56), systemic sclerosis (57) and Sjögren’s syndrome (58). Expression of STAT4 was increased in cells harboring the risk allele, suggesting that these ADs result from a gain of STAT4 activity (59). STAT4 is involved in the differentiation of Th1 cells, and thus increased expression of STAT4 may enhance Th1 cell activity. Interestingly, although the STAT4 locus is also associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (5), the eQTL effect of the risk allele is in the opposite direction when compared with that of other ADs (Table 1). Therefore, both up-regulation of STAT3 and down-regulation of STAT4 are involved in the disease pathogenesis, suggesting the role of T-helper subsets may be mutually exclusive. STAT4 also is involved in type I interferon signaling, as will be discussed below.

Regulatory T cells

The role of regulatory T cells (Treg cells, usually defined as CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T cells) in murine autoimmunity is well established; in the mouse, Treg-cell deficiency abrogates self-tolerance and causes AD (60). However, the roles of Treg cells in complex human ADs remain unknown, as do the identities of genetic factors that influence the activity of Treg cells. Analyses of the risk loci for rheumatoid arthritis showed that H3K4me3 (a promoter- and enhancer-specific modification associated with active transcription) is particularly enriched in primary Treg cells compared with the levels in another 33 cell types (61). Another study showed that causal variants of some ADs such as celiac disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and SLE are enriched in acetylated cis-regulatory elements of Treg cells (14). These observations suggest that a substantial proportion of AD risk variants are involved in transcriptional regulation of genes that affect Treg-cell function.

The interpretation of these findings is complicated by the fact that the majority of genes implicated in Treg-cell function is also expressed in other CD4+ T-cell subsets. For instance, the CCR6 gene, for which a regulatory variant was associated with multiple ADs (including rheumatoid arthritis), is expressed in both Th17 cells and Treg cells (62). Although increased CCR6 expression was observed in cells harboring the risk allele, the cell types in which this variant drives the disease pathology are not known.

A recent eQTL analysis demonstrated that some genes (including CTLA4, IL2RA, IL2RB, FCRL3 and RTKN2) identified via GWASs of ADs were up-regulated in Treg cells when levels were compared with those in conventional CD4+ T cells (63). Among the candidate loci, FCRL3 and RTKN2 are of potential interest, because their functional roles in human Treg cells are not well established. FCRL3, which exhibits association with rheumatoid arthritis and Graves’ disease (64), was previously shown to have inhibitory potential in B cells (65). More recently, FCRL3 was shown to be expressed in a subset of Treg cells in humans that have decreased capacity to suppress the proliferation of effector T cells (compared with FCRL3 Treg cells) (66).

RTKN2, another risk gene for rheumatoid arthritis (67), encodes a Rho-GTPase effector protein. Although the major long transcript is expressed in multiple tissues, recent CAGE (cap analysis gene expression)-seq analysis of human Treg cells demonstrated that a shorter transcript is selectively expressed in Treg cells (68). Both of these isoforms have potential to enhance NF-κB signaling (Y. Kochi and K. Myouzen, unpublished data), but the role of the short isoform in human Treg cells is unknown. This shorter transcript may impair the regulatory function of Treg cells or, alternatively, the shorter version may affect the plasticity of Treg cells for development into effector cells such as Th1-like or Th17-like cells.

In addition to the classical Treg cells (defined as CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T cells), various subsets of Treg cells have been proposed in both physiological and pathological conditions. Among these subpopulations, the CD4+CD25LAG3+ T-cell subset (designated LAG3+ Treg cells) has regulatory potential to suppress antibody production by B cells in both humans and mice (69, 70). LAG3+ Treg cells also are characterized by the production of large amounts of IL-10 and TGF-β3; the latter factor is important in the regulation of antibody production (69). The transcriptional factor Egr2 is essential in the regulation of LAG3+ Treg cells in the mouse (70). In addition, lymphocyte-specific Egr2 defects lead to a lupus-like autoimmune phenotype with no impact on the development of Foxp3+ Treg cells (71). In humans, significant association signals were observed in the EGR2 locus in the GWASs of rheumatoid arthritis (72) and inflammatory bowel diseases (5). Additionally, regulatory polymorphisms in EGR2 have been reported to be associated with SLE (73). Notably, decreased frequencies of LAG3+ Treg cells were observed in SLE patients (69). These data imply that abnormality in LAG3+ Treg cells is involved in these ADs. Although IL-10 is a hallmark cytokine for LAG3+ Treg cells, an association with the IL10 locus is restricted to SLE, inflammatory bowel diseases and Behçet’s disease, suggesting that a pathological role for LAG3+ Treg cells may be restricted to these autoimmune conditions.

Type I interferons

For ADs involving the adaptive immune system, an immune response to a self-antigen is considered a principal disease mechanism. Nonetheless, multiple lines of evidence from disease models of AD suggest that the innate immune system also plays an important role in such conditions. Among the players of the innate immune system, type I interferons, which are activated by pattern-recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors and which elicit antiviral and immunomodulatory responses, are implicated in the pathogenesis of some ADs such as SLE and myositis (74). The importance of type I interferon signaling in SLE is evident from the expression profile of peripheral blood cells; patients with SLE exhibit a signature up-regulation of type I interferon genes.

In addition, GWASs performed for SLE have identified multiple loci associated with type I interferon signaling pathways, including TLR7, IRAK1, IRF5, TYK2, IRF7 and IFIH1 (75). Some of these genes also are shared with other ADs. For instance, IRF5 is associated with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases and primary biliary cirrhosis; IFIH1 is associated with type 1 diabetes, psoriasis and inflammatory diseases.

STAT4, as mentioned above, is also activated by type I interferons, and STAT4 is essential for the production of IFN-γ in T cells and natural killer cells (76). Higher IFN-α activity was observed in SLE patients with the IRF5 risk haplotype, whereas increased sensitivity to IFN-α signaling was associated with the STAT4 risk allele (77). As observed for IRF5, the risk allele of IRF7 is associated with elevated serum levels of IFN-α in SLE patients (78).

These lines of evidence indicate that the combination of genetic variants determines the level of the type I interferon activity in an individual, which in turn affects susceptibility to disease. Interestingly, the PTPN22 risk variant Lyp620W, which has been associated with SLE, as well as with many other ADs, has been shown to be associated with reduced TLR7-induced type I interferon signaling in SLE patients (79), suggesting that genetic heterogeneity exists in the disease.

Conclusions and future directions

As seen in this review, GWASs have identified many genetic factors for ADs and have contributed to characterization of the pathogenesis of individual diseases. Utilization of these findings in clinical practice is still under way, but holds promise for future success. Notably, genetic etiology (association with IL23R-encoding and IL23A-encoding loci) and response to drug treatment (anti-IL-12/IL-23 and anti-IL-17 therapy) have been linked in the case of psoriasis (80). However, before such clinical applications can be achieved in other ADs, many issues will have to be addressed.

The causal mechanisms suggested by GWASs remain to be dissected. Missing heritability that cannot be identified by GWAS will need to be explored and may reflect the occurrence of rare variants. Innovative statistical approaches using known genetic and environmental factors are needed to better predict an individual’s pathological condition and prognosis for precision medicine. I am optimistic about these applications, as I have, just in the last decade, witnessed scientific progress beyond my imagination.

Conflict of interest statement: The author declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1. Lleo A. Invernizzi P. Gao B. Podda M. and Gershwin M. E. 2010. Definition of human autoimmunity--autoantibodies versus autoimmune disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 9:A259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hayter S. M. and Cook M. C. 2012. Updated assessment of the prevalence, spectrum and case definition of autoimmune disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 11:754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Okada Y., Wu D., Trynka G., et al. 2014. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 506:376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium ; Beecham A. H., Patsopoulos N. A., Xifara D. K., et al. 2013. Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet. 45:1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jostins L., Ripke S., Weersma R. K., et al. 2012. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 491:119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gusev A., Lee S. H., Trynka G., et al. 2014. Partitioning heritability of regulatory and cell-type-specific variants across 11 common diseases. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95:535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dubois P. C., Trynka G., Franke L., et al. 2010. Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nat. Genet. 42:295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Okada Y., Shimane K., Kochi Y., et al. 2012. A genome-wide association study identified AFF1 as a susceptibility locus for systemic lupus eyrthematosus in Japanese. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Raj T., Rothamel K., Mostafavi S., et al. 2014. Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. Science 344:519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. De Jager P. L., Hacohen N., Mathis D., et al. 2015. ImmVar project: Insights and design considerations for future studies of “healthy” immune variation. Semin. Immunol. 27:51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. GTEx Consortium ; Ardlie K. G., Deluca D. S., Segrè A. V., et al. 2015. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 348:648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. ENCODE Project Consortium ; Dunham I., Kundaje A., Aldred S. F., et al. 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kundaje A., Meuleman W., Ernst J., et al. ; Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium 2015. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518:317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Farh K. K., Marson A., Zhu J., et al. 2014. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518:337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Witte S. O’Shea J. J. and Vahedi G. 2015. Super-enhancers: asset management in immune cell genomes. Trends Immunol. 36:519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hnisz D., Abraham B. J., Lee T. I., et al. 2013. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155:934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. 2007. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447:661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Breban M. Costantino F. Andre C. Chiocchia G. and Garchon H. J. 2015. Revisiting MHC genes in spondyloarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 17:516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Newton J. L. Harney S. M. Wordsworth B. P. and Brown M. A. 2004. A review of the MHC genetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Genes Immun. 5:151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gregersen P. K. Silver J. and Winchester R. J. 1987. The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 30:1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Raychaudhuri S., Sandor C., Stahl E. A., et al. 2012. Five amino acids in three HLA proteins explain most of the association between MHC and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 44:291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Han B., Diogo D., Eyre S., et al. 2014. Fine mapping seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis to shared and distinct HLA alleles by adjusting for the effects of heterogeneity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94:522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Nejentsev S., Howson J. M., Walker N. M., et al. 2007. Localization of type 1 diabetes susceptibility to the MHC class I genes HLA-B and HLA-A. Nature 450:887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hu X., Deutsch A. J., Lenz T. L., et al. 2015. Additive and interaction effects at three amino acid positions in HLA-DQ and HLA-DR molecules drive type 1 diabetes risk. Nat. Genet. 47:898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Moutsianas L., Jostins L., Beecham A. H., et al. ; International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. 2015. Class II HLA interactions modulate genetic risk for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet. 47:1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Okada Y., Momozawa Y., Ashikawa K., et al. 2015. Construction of a population-specific HLA imputation reference panel and its application to Graves’ disease risk in Japanese. Nat. Genet. 47:798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sakaguchi N., Takahashi T., Hata H., et al. 2003. Altered thymic T-cell selection due to a mutation of the ZAP-70 gene causes autoimmune arthritis in mice. Nature 426:454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kumar K. R., Li L., Yan M., et al. 2006. Regulation of B cell tolerance by the lupus susceptibility gene Ly108. Science 312:1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gregersen P. K. Lee H. S. Batliwalla F. and Begovich A. B. 2006. PTPN22: setting thresholds for autoimmunity. Semin. Immunol. 18:214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Arechiga A. F., Habib T., He Y., et al. 2009. Cutting edge: the PTPN22 allelic variant associated with autoimmunity impairs B cell signaling. J. Immunol. 182:3343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Vang T., Congia M., Macis M. D., et al. 2005. Autoimmune-associated lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase is a gain-of-function variant. Nat. Genet. 37:1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Begovich A. B., Carlton V. E., Honigberg L. A., et al. 2004. A missense single-nucleotide polymorphism in a gene encoding a protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPN22) is associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75:330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang J., Zahir N., Jiang Q., et al. 2011. The autoimmune disease-associated PTPN22 variant promotes calpain-mediated Lyp/Pep degradation associated with lymphocyte and dendritic cell hyperresponsiveness. Nat. Genet. 43:902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dai X., James R. G., Habib T., et al. 2013. A disease-associated PTPN22 variant promotes systemic autoimmunity in murine models. J. Clin. Invest. 123:2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rawlings D. J. Dai X. and Buckner J. H. 2015. The role of PTPN22 risk variant in the development of autoimmunity: finding common ground between mouse and human. J. Immunol. 194:2977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Stanford S. M. and Bottini N. 2014. PTPN22: the archetypal non-HLA autoimmunity gene. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 10:602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Manjarrez-Orduño N., Marasco E., Chung S. A., et al. 2012. CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation. Nat. Genet. 44:1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Simpfendorfer K. R., Armstead B. E., Shih A., et al. 2015. Autoimmune disease-associated haplotypes of BLK exhibit lowered thresholds for B cell activation and expansion of Ig class-switched B cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67:2866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hom G., Graham R. R., Modrek B., et al. 2008. Association of systemic lupus erythematosus with C8orf13-BLK and ITGAM-ITGAX. N. Engl. J. Med. 358:900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Dymecki S. M. Niederhuber J. E. and Desiderio S. V. 1990. Specific expression of a tyrosine kinase gene, blk, in B lymphoid cells. Science 247:332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Vahedi G., Kanno Y., Furumoto Y., et al. 2015. Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells. Nature 520:558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Duerr R. H., Taylor K. D., Brant S. R., et al. 2006. A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene. Science 314:1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Nair R. P., Duffin K. C., Helms C., et al. 2009. Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nat. Genet. 41:199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Reveille J. D., Sims A. M., Danoy P., et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study of ankylosing spondylitis identifies non-MHC susceptibility loci. Nat. Genet. 42:123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sarin R. Wu X. and Abraham C. 2011. Inflammatory disease protective R381Q IL23 receptor polymorphism results in decreased primary CD4+ and CD8+ human T-cell functional responses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108:9560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Remmers E. F., Cosan F., Kirino Y., et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the MHC class I, IL10, and IL23R-IL12RB2 regions associated with Behçet’s disease. Nat. Genet. 42:698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mizuki N., Meguro A., Ota M., et al. 2010. Genome-wide association studies identify IL23R-IL12RB2 and IL10 as Behçet’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat. Genet. 42:703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Parkes M. Cortes A. van Heel D. A. and Brown M. A. 2013. Genetic insights into common pathways and complex relationships among immune-mediated diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hirschfield G. M., Liu X., Xu C., et al. 2009. Primary biliary cirrhosis associated with HLA, IL12A, and IL12RB2 variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 360:2544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bossini-Castillo L., Martin J. E., Broen J., et al. 2012. A GWAS follow-up study reveals the association of the IL12RB2 gene with systemic sclerosis in Caucasian populations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21:926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Mayes M. D., Bossini-Castillo L., Gorlova O., et al. 2014. Immunochip analysis identifies multiple susceptibility loci for systemic sclerosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Jakkula E., Leppä V., Sulonen A. M., et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study in a high-risk isolate for multiple sclerosis reveals associated variants in STAT3 gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86:285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Barrett J. C., Hansoul S., Nicolae D. L., et al. 2008. Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn’s disease. Nat. Genet. 40:955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Tsoi L. C., Spain S. L., Knight J., et al. 2012. Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity. Nat. Genet. 44:1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Westra H. J., Peters M. J., Esko T., et al. 2013. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat. Genet. 45:1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Remmers E. F., Plenge R. M., Lee A. T., et al. 2007. STAT4 and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Radstake T. R., Gorlova O., Rueda B., et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study of systemic sclerosis identifies CD247 as a new susceptibility locus. Nat. Genet. 42:426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lessard C. J., Li H., Adrianto I., et al. 2013. Variants at multiple loci implicated in both innate and adaptive immune responses are associated with Sjögren’s syndrome. Nat. Genet. 45:1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sigurdsson S., Nordmark G., Garnier S., et al. 2008. A risk haplotype of STAT4 for systemic lupus erythematosus is over-expressed, correlates with anti-dsDNA and shows additive effects with two risk alleles of IRF5. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17:2868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Sakaguchi S. Yamaguchi T. Nomura T. and Ono M. 2008. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133:775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Trynka G., Sandor C., Han B., et al. 2013. Chromatin marks identify critical cell types for fine mapping complex trait variants. Nat. Genet. 45:124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Kochi Y., Okada Y., Suzuki A., et al. 2010. A regulatory variant in CCR6 is associated with rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 42:515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Ferraro A., D’Alise A. M., Raj T., et al. 2014. Interindividual variation in human T regulatory cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111:E1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Kochi Y., Yamada R., Suzuki A., et al. 2005. A functional variant in FCRL3, encoding Fc receptor-like 3, is associated with rheumatoid arthritis and several autoimmunities. Nat. Genet. 37:478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Kochi Y., Myouzen K., Yamada R., et al. 2009. FCRL3, an autoimmune susceptibility gene, has inhibitory potential on B-cell receptor-mediated signaling. J. Immunol. 183:5502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Swainson L. A. Mold J. E. Bajpai U. D. and McCune J. M. 2010. Expression of the autoimmune susceptibility gene FcRL3 on human regulatory T cells is associated with dysfunction and high levels of programmed cell death-1. J. Immunol. 184:3639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Myouzen K., Kochi Y., Okada Y., et al. 2012. Functional variants in NFKBIE and RTKN2 involved in activation of the NF-κB pathway are associated with rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Schmidl C., Hansmann L., Lassmann T., et al. 2014. The enhancer and promoter landscape of human regulatory and conventional T-cell subpopulations. Blood 123:e68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Okamura T., Sumitomo S., Morita K., et al. 2015. TGF-beta3-expressing CD4+CD25(-)LAG3+ regulatory T cells control humoral immune responses. Nat. Commun. 6:6329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Okamura T., Fujio K., Shibuya M., et al. 2009. CD4+CD25-LAG3+ regulatory T cells controlled by the transcription factor Egr-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106:13974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Yang L., Anderson D. E., Baecher-Allan C., et al. 2008. IL-21 and TGF-beta are required for differentiation of human T(H)17 cells. Nature 454:350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Okada Y., Terao C., Ikari K., et al. 2012. Meta-analysis identifies nine new loci associated with rheumatoid arthritis in the Japanese population. Nat. Genet. 44:511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Myouzen K., Kochi Y., Shimane K., et al. 2010. Regulatory polymorphisms in EGR2 are associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19:2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Lopez de Padilla C. M. and Niewold T. B. 2016. The type I interferons: Basic concepts and clinical relevance in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Gene 576:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Deng Y. and Tsao B. P. 2014. Advances in lupus genetics and epigenetics. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 26:482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Liang Y. Pan H. F. and Ye D. Q. 2014. Therapeutic potential of STAT4 in autoimmunity. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 18:945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Kariuki S. N., Kirou K. A., MacDermott E. J., et al. 2009. Cutting edge: autoimmune disease risk variant of STAT4 confers increased sensitivity to IFN-alpha in lupus patients in vivo. J. Immunol. 182:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Salloum R., Franek B. S., Kariuki S. N., et al. 2010. Genetic variation at the IRF7/PHRF1 locus is associated with autoantibody profile and serum interferon-alpha activity in lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum. 62:553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Wang Y., Ewart D., Crabtree J. N., et al. 2015. PTPN22 Variant R620W Is Associated With Reduced Toll-like Receptor 7-Induced Type I Interferon in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67:2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Cho J. H. and Feldman M. 2015. Heterogeneity of autoimmune diseases: pathophysiologic insights from genetics and implications for new therapies. Nat. Med. 21:730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Immunology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES