Abstract
The rate of supernovae (SNe) in our local galactic neighborhood within a distance of ~100 parsec from Earth (1 parsec (pc)=3.26 light years) is estimated at 1 SN every 2-4 million years (Myr), based on the total SN-rate in the Milky Way (2.0±0.7 per century1,2). Recent massive-star and SN activity in Earth’s vicinity may be evidenced by traces of radionuclides with half-lives t1/2 ≤100 Myr3-6, if trapped in interstellar dust grains that penetrate the Solar System (SS). One such radionuclide is 60Fe (t1/2=2.6 Myr)7,8 which is ejected in supernova explosions and winds from massive stars1,2,9. Here we report that the 60Fe signal observed previously in deep-sea crusts10,11, is global, extended in time and of interstellar origin from multiple events. Deep-sea archives from all major oceans were analyzed for 60Fe deposition via accretion of interstellar dust particles. Our results, based on 60Fe atom-counting at state-of-the-art sensitivity8, reveal 60Fe interstellar influxes onto Earth 1.7–3.2 Myr and 6.5–8.7 Myr ago. The measured signal implies that a few percent of fresh 60Fe was captured in dust and deposited on Earth. Our findings indicate multiple supernova and massive-star events during the last ~10 Myr at nearby distances ≤100 pc.
The density and temperature distribution of the interstellar medium (ISM) is highly variable, with typical substructures of ~50–150 pc (superbubbles) having life-times of some 10 Myr. Several SN explosions over the last ~14 Myr shaped the present structure of the local superbubble (LB)12-14. The SS, now embedded in the LB, is expected to have faced fronts of SN ejecta and accumulated material from massive stars. To enter the SS, any material from the ISM must be condensed into larger dust grains to avoid being deflected away by the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field3,10,11. ISM dust particles were indeed identified at Earth orbit15 and may accumulate on Earth in archives such as deep-sea sediments and ferromanganese (FeMn) crusts and nodules which retain time information over millions of years. 60Fe as well as 26Al (t1/2=0.71 Myr) are observed1,9 in the ISM as a result of many SNe and emission from massive stars. Direct detection of ‘live’ radionuclides3-5,10,11 on Earth would provide insight into recent and nearby nucleosynthesis in massive stars14,16,17, dust formation and transport into the SS. Extraterrestrial 60Fe was in fact already observed in FeMn crusts in pioneering studies at TU Munich10,11, and interpreted as being of SN10,11,18 or (micro)meteoritic origin19,20.
In the present work, the 60Fe contents of three different deep-sea archives (four sediment cores, two FeMn-crusts and two FeMn-nodules) recovered from the Indian, Pacific and Atlantic Oceans respectively (Supplementary Figure S1) were determined. All were dated via their 10Be (t1/2=1.39 Myr) content, complemented by 26Al for the sediments21. All radionuclides (60Fe, 26Al and 10Be) were counted using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) (Supplementary Information). The sediment cores provided a record from 1.7-3.2 Myr BP (before present) with a time resolution of <30 kyr, bracketed by recent and ~5-7 Myr old samples. Pacific ‘Crust-1’ extends from present to 10.9 Myr with ~2.2 Myr time resolution and ‘Crust-2’ from 1.2–7 Myr BP (~100 kyr resolution). Two nodules covered 5.4 Myr BP (~2 Myr resolution).
In the sediment, 288 60Fe-events were registered for the time period 1.71-3.18 Myr (45 individual samples) with a mean isotopic ratio 60Fe/Fe=(1.79±0.10)×10−15, a factor of ~40 above the measurement background of (0.042±0.015)×10−15. None of the recent or old sediment samples show evidence for 60Fe above background (3 60Fe-events). The first two layers in Crust-1 gave 60Fe-signals 4σ and 7σ above background; layers 3 and 5 are close to the measurement background, but layer 4, which spans the period 6.5-8.7 Myr, has a significantly higher ratio (~4σ above background, Table 2). For Crust-2 a clear 60Fe-signal was also found at <3.5 Myr. The nodules support this finding (Table 3, Supplementary Tables S3-S5).
Table 2. 60Fe/Fe-ratios from AMS measurements at ANU of layered samples of the two Pacific FeMn crust samples (Crust-1 and Crust-2) and of the two Atlantic FeMn nodules (no. 21 and 24).
| Crust-1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| layer | depth (mm) | time period (Myr) | 60Fe counts detected | 60Fe/Fe (10−15 at/at)a | 60Fe/Fe│d.c. (10−15 at/at)b | Fe conc. (10−2 g g−1)c | 60Fe conc. (106 at g−1) | 60Fe incorp. rates (atoms·cm−2yr−1) | 60Fe incorporation (106 at·cm−2/layer) |
| Layer 1 | 0 – 5 | 0 – 2.17 | 23 | 0.96±0.25 | 1.19±0.33 | 12.8±0.1 | 1.64±0.45 | 0.72±0.20 | 1.56±0.43 |
| Layer 2 | 5 – 10 | 2.17 – 4.35 | 74 | 1.58±0.23 | 3.60±0.55 | 11.8±0.1 | 4.56±0.68 | 2.00±0.30 | 4.34±0.65 |
| Layer 3 | 10 – 15 | 4.35 – 6.52 | 2 | 0.14±0.12 | 0.36±0.51 | 11.4±0.1 | 0.34±0.62 | 0.19±0.27 | 0.40±0.59 |
| Layer 4 | 15 – 20 | 6.52 – 8.70 | 26 | 0.38±0.09 | 2.49±0.97 | 13.7±0.2 | 3.67±1.43 | 1.61±0.63 | 3.49±1.36 |
| Layer 5 | 20 – 25 | 8.70 – 10.87 | 3 | 0.15±0.11 | 1.20±1.50 | 11.2±0.2 | 1.45±1.82 | 0.64±0.80 | 1.38±1.73 |
| total | 0–4.35 & 6.52-8.70 | 123 | -- | -- | 9.4±0.9 | ||||
| Crust-2 | |||||||||
| Layer 1-2 | 0 – 1.0 | 1.20 – 1.41 | 5 | 1.06±0.48 | 1.50±0.67 | 11.6±0.1 | 1.87±0.83 | 1.67±0.75 | 0.36±0.16 |
| Layer 3-5 | 1.0 – 2.5 | 1.41 – 1.73 | 37 | 1.28±0.21 | 2.01±0.33 | 11.9±0.1 | 2.60±0.43 | 2.33±0.38 | 0.74±0.12 |
| Layer 6-8 | 2.5 – 4.0 | 1.73 – 2.05 | 32 | 0.84±0.15 | 1.39±0.25 | 11.8±0.1 | 1.73±0.31 | 1.55±0.27 | 0.50±0.09 |
| Layer 9-10 | 4.0 – 5.8 | 2.05 – 3.05 | 20 | 0.55±0.12 | 1.09±0.24 | 11.1±0.1 | 1.35±0.30 | 0.46±0.10 | 0.46±0.10 |
| Layer 11-12 | 5.8 – 7.7 | 3.05 – 4.11 | 2 | 0.12±0.08 | 0.29±0.21 | 10.4±0.1 | 0.37±0.26 | 0.13±0.09 | 0.13±0.09 |
| Layer 13-26 | 7.7 – 21.0 | 4.11 –7 | 1 | <0.03 | <0.1 | 9 | <0.1 | <0.09 | <0.06 |
| 60Fe: | 0 – 7.7 | 1.20 – 3.05 | 94 | -- | 2.19±0.22 | ||||
| Nodule 21 | |||||||||
| Layer 1 | 0 – 3 | 0 – 1.8 | 3 | 0.16±0.11 | <0.23 | 15±2 | <0.4 | <0.13 | <0.23 |
| Layer 2 | 3 – 6 | 1.8 – 3.3 | 13 | 0.47±0.16 | 0.60±0.22 | 15±2 | 0.97±0.36 | 0.40±0.15 | 0.55±0.21 |
| Layer 3/4 | 6 – 17 | 3.3 – 5.4 | 5 | 0.18±0.06 | <0.10 | 15±2 | <0.16 | <0.1 | <0.23 |
| 60Fe: | 3 – 6 | 1.8–3.3 | 13 | 0.47±0.16 | 0.60±0.22 | 15±2 | 0.97±0.36 | 0.40±0.15 | 0.55±0.21 |
| Nodule 24 | |||||||||
| Layer 1 | 0 – 4 | 0–1.9 | 15 | 0.56±0.18 | 0.71±0.23 | 15±2 | 1.13±0.37 | 0.34±0.11 | 0.86±0.41 |
| Layer 2 | 4 – 8 | 1.9–3.3 | 5 | 0.23±0.12 | 0.45±0.23 | 15±2 | 0.71±0.37 | 0.27±0.15 | 0.54±0.34 |
| Layer 3/4 | 8 – 19 | 3.3–5.4 | 1 | 0.05±0.05 | <0.15 | 15±2 | <0.24 | <0.1 | <0.25 |
| 60Fe: | 0 – 8 | 0–3.3 | 20 | 0.40±0.10 | 0.58±0.13 | 15±2 | 0.92±0.21 | 0.31±0.09 | 1.40±0.50 |
measured 60Fe/Fe ratios. The uncertainties from 60Fe denote statistical uncertainties only (1σ, using Poisson statistics).
background & decay corrected (d.c.) 60Fe/Fe data. The machine background of 60Fe/Fe=(0.042±0.015)×10−15 was used for the subsequent background correction. Ages are based on the 10Be data and have an uncertainty of ±0.3 Myr (Crust-1) and ±0.5 Myr (Crust-2 and nodules).
stable iron content of the dissolved crust material and of the leachate in case of the nodules, as measured via ICP-MS. The mean dry density of the crust and nodule samples was 1.9·g·cm−3. ‘conc.’ means ‘concentration’. The Fe concentration listed for Crust-2, layers 13-26 is the average; individual data range between 5.5 and 13.1%.
Table 3.
Summary of 60Fe-deposition into various archives as obtained in this work and given in the literature10,11,22 (no correction for incorporation efficiency). Uncertainties are 1σ.
| Deep-sea archive | cores | location | time period (Myr) | 60Fe detector events | 60Fe deposition (106 at·cm−2)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Sediment | 4 | Indian Ocean | 1.71 – 3.18 | 288 | 35.4±2.6 |
|
| |||||
| FeMn Crust 1 | 2 | Pacific Ocean | 0 – 4.35 | 97 | 5.9±0.8 |
| FeMn Crust 1 | 6.52 – 8.70 | 26 | 3.5±1.0 | ||
| FeMn Crust 2 | 1.2 – 3.1 | 94 | 2.2±0.2 | ||
|
| |||||
| FeMn nodules | 2 | Atlantic Ocean | 1.8 – 3.3 0 – 3.3 |
13 20 |
0.6±0.2 1.4±0.5 |
|
| |||||
| FeMn Mona Pihoa10 | 1 | Pacific ocean | 0 – 5.9 | 21 | ~9b |
|
| |||||
| FeMn 237KD11 | 1 | Pacific ocean | 1.74 – 2.61b | 69 | 1.5±0.4b |
|
| |||||
| Lunar material22 | 1 | Moon | integral | --c | ~10 |
In summary, two clear 60Fe signals with a total of 538 60Fe-events were observed. In the sediments, the signal covers the time period 1.7–3.2 Myr. In the crusts, 60Fe is found up to 3.5 and ~4 Myr, with a second influx between 6.5 and 8.7 Myr. The nodules confirm the presence of 60Fe at <3.3 Myr. No 60Fe signal is found in recent (<0.2 Myr) or older (≥5 Myr) sediments and nodules, or in crusts between 4.4–6.5 and 8.7–10.9 Myr.
Between 1.7 and 3.1 Myr, the 60Fe deposition rate into the sediments was ~11–35 60Fe atoms·cm−2yr−1 (300-kyr averages), whereas incorporation rates into crust material were significantly lower at 1–2 atoms·cm−2·yr−1 (Figure 1, all data are decay-corrected). This suggests an incorporation-efficiency into Crust-1 and Crust-2 of 17% and 7%, respectively. The deposition in the 1.5-Myr interval covered by the signal in the sediment is (35±2)×106 atoms·cm−2. For the second 60Fe signal (6.5-8.7 Myr, Crust-1, 17% incorporation) it is (21±6)×106 atoms·cm−2 (Tables 2-3).
Figure 1. Deposition rates for sediment (150 kyr averaged data) and incorporation rates for two crust samples.
60Fe concentrations (60Fe/g) for the sediment are given in the inset; they were on average 6.7×104 atoms/g between 1.7 and 3.2 Myr, but 260×104 atoms/g crust and 95×104 atoms/g nodule, reflecting the difference in growth rate and incorporation efficiency (see Supplement). The error bars (1σ) include all uncertainties and scale with decay correction, thus upper limits are becoming larger for older samples. The absolute ages for the sediment are uncertain by 0.1 Myr, but for the 5.5-Myr sediments ~1 Myr. Ages of Crust-1 are 0.3 and of Crust-2 0.5 Myr uncertain.
Although the 1.5 Myr time-spread of 60Fe influx measured in the present work exceeds the ~0.8 Myr previously reported for crust 237KD11,18, the two time profiles are not inconsistent given the lower counting statistics and signal-to-background in Ref. 11. Furthermore, the marginally positive result for the same time period for an Atlantic sediment18 is consistent with our data, considering their higher sedimentation rates and stable Fe-contents. 60Fe has also been reported in lunar material, though without time information22 and recently in Pacific sediments23.
Clearly, our data are incompatible with a constant 60Fe production or deposition. A terrestrial origin can be ruled out, because there is no suitable target for cosmic-ray induced production and anthropogenic input would be concentrated in the surface layer. Since 60Fe was found in each of the major oceans, it is reasonable to assume a uniform global distribution. A micro-meteoritic or meteoritic origin can be excluded, since the measured cosmic-dust flux is 400 times lower than would be required (Supplementary Information and Figure S6). Similarly a hypothetical break-up of a single object, comparable to the asteroid invoked in relation to the K/T event 65 Myr ago, would have delivered 4,500 times less 60Fe.
We assume that the extraterrestrial 60Fe flux through Earth’s cross-section is homogenously distributed over Earth’s surface. Thus, the measured mean deposition of ~24.5 atoms·cm−2yr−1 (1.7–3.2 Myr signal) corresponds to a 60Fe-flux of 98 atoms·cm−2yr−1 into the inner SS or integrated over 1.5 Myr to an 60Fe-fluence of (1.46±0.15)×108 atoms·cm−2 at Earth orbit; the fluence for the older event is (1.2±0.4)×108 atoms·cm−2. Interstellar grains, filtered by the SS in size to an average of ~0.5 μm, were detected by space missions15, suggesting that (6±3)% (εdust) in mass of ISM dust reaches the inner SS6. These grains follow the flow velocity of the ISM. Assuming the 60Fe-loaded grains follow the same mass-distribution as determined for ISM grains at Earth orbit, we deduce an interstellar 60Fe-concentration in dust of (2.8±1.4)×10−11 60Fe atoms·cm−3 for 1.7-3.2 Myr and integrated over the full period of 11 Myr an average concentration of ~(5-15)×10−12 atoms·cm−3. Observations of 60Fe-decay1,9 and nucleosynthesis models2 suggest an average Galaxy concentration of ~6×10−12 60Fe atoms·cm−3 (Supplementary Information), in agreement with the 11-Myr local-data reported here.
60Fe is produced in massive stars2,24-27 in their late phases, predominantly just before SN-explosions, and then ejected into space. (Super)AGB stars also produce and eject 60Fe through their stellar winds during ~50 kyr, leading to a time profile similar to SNe; however, their contribution to the galactic 60Fe inventory is small28.
Models suggest a travel time of ~200 kyr with a time spread of ~100–400 kyr5 for ejecta from a single SN at ~100pc distance. Our measured spread of ~1.5-Myr is inconsistent with the interpretation in terms of ejecta from a single SN (or AGB-star) moving across the SS (Supplementary Figure S6). It suggests multiple SN- and massive-star activities within the last ~10 Myr in Earth’s vicinity and two distinct periods 1.7–3.2 and ~6.5–8.7 Myr BP. The recent time profile would be compatible with movement across the SS of ejecta in a series of SN-fronts in short succession within 1.5 Myr. This would, however, require a high SN-frequency (~2-3 SNe/Myr) since large fluctuations were not observed in the time profile. Alternatively, the ejecta containing the 60Fe-bearing grains could have come to rest in the ambient ISM and diffused into volumes or clouds, that were then traversed by the SS18.
The SS is currently embedded in a flow of ISM-material with interstellar grains moving parallel to the flow of neutral interstellar gas in local ISM clouds arguing for a common history or driver29. Such clouds were suggested as part of an expanding superbubble-shell driven by SNe and winds from massive stars29,12-14. Assuming the ejecta originate from a distance 70-100 pc (~limit of the LB) and 60Fe is equally distributed into the outer shell of size 30 pc (distance representing 1.5 Myr travel), i.e. a spherical shell of mean radius 70-100 pc with a thickness of 30 pc, we deduce a total 60Fe mass trapped in ISM dust of (5–11)×10−5 solar masses (M⊙) in the shell volume. This number represents a lower limit as it reflects the fraction of 60Fe condensed into dust without correction for radioactive decay and neglects the granularity of clumpy ejecta. Models predict core-collapse and electron-capture SN-nucleosynthesis yields for 60Fe to be (0.5–14)×10−5 M⊙ for 8–25 M⊙-stars24-27,2, depending on the progenitor mass with large uncertainties in the nuclear-physics input. (Super)AGB stars produce (0.003–1)×10−5 M⊙ 60Fe28. Our observed signals therefore favor SN events. The fraction of 60Fe in dust can be roughly estimated by a comparison of our measured 60Fe deposition with nucleosynthesis yields. Under these assumptions and assuming reasonable distances (20–100pc) ~0.4-9% of 60Fe would be trapped in dust (Supplementary Information, Figures S7 and S8).
Comparing our data with a similar work for ISM-244Pu in sediments and crust samples6 yields a 244Pu/60Fe atom-ratio of ~3×10−5 or less during periods of elevated 60Fe deposition over the last 10 Myr which agrees with the recently reported low 244Pu SN-yields6 (Supplementary Information).
Our broad and global 60Fe-influx on Earth demonstrates recent (<10Myr) and wide-spread massive-star ejections in our near galactic neighborhood (<100pc), most likely from SN-explosions. Interestingly, the older event coincides with a strong increase in 3He and temperature change ~8 Myr BP30, while the more recent activity starting ~3 Myr BP occurred at the same time as Earth’s temperature started to decrease during the Plio-Pleistocene transition.
Supplementary Material
Table 1. Averaged 60Fe/Fe atom ratios from AMS measurements at ANU.
52 sediment samples from four sediment cores (Eltanin) from the Indian Ocean were analyzed (individual data are listed in the Supplementary Information) as well as a series of blank samples (commercial iron).
| sediment cores | sediment samples | time period (Myr) | 60Fe counts detected | 60Fe/Fe (10−15 at/at)a | 60Fe/Fe│d.c. (10−15 at/at)b | Fe conc. (10−2 g g−1)c | 60Fe conc. (104 at g−1) | 60Fe-deposition rates (at cm−2yr−1) | 60Fe deposition (106 at·cm−2 layer−1)d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45-21 / 50-02 | 5 | < 0.2 | 2 | 0.06±0.04 | 0.02±0.02 | 0.30±0.10 | <0.2 | <0.2 | -- |
| 49-53 / 45-21 | 14 | 1.71 – 2.0 | 123 | 1.67±0.15 | 2.52±0.23 | 0.23±0.01 | 6.0±0.6 | 22.8±2.3 | 6.5±0.7 |
| 49-53 / 45-21 / 50-02 | 11 | 2.0 – 2.3 | 51 | 1.51±0.21 | 2.48±0.35 | 0.24±0.01 | 6.7±1.0 | 24.8±3.6 | 7.4±1.1 |
| 49-53 / 45-21 / 50-02 | 7 | 2.3 – 2.6 | 33 | 1.96±0.34 | 3.50±0.61 | 0.17±0.01 | 6.5±1.2 | 27.1±5.0 | 8.1±1.5 |
| 49-53 / 45-16 | 7 | 2.6 – 2.9 | 54 | 3.40±0.46 | 6.61±0.90 | 0.16±0.01 | 10.3±1.5 | 34.8±5.2 | 10.4±1.5 |
| 49-53 / 45-16 | 6 | 2.9 – 3.18 | 27 | 1.18±0.23 | 2.41±0.47 | 0.13±0.01 | 3.4±0.7 | 11.4±2.4 | 3.0±0.6 |
| 45-16 | 2 | ~4–7e | 1 | 0.11±0.11 | 0.20±0.30 | 0.14±0.01 | <0.4 | <1 | -- |
| commercial iron | 99 | background | 7 | 0.042±0.015 | -- |
measured 60Fe/Fe ratios. The uncertainties from 60Fe denote statistical uncertainties only (1σ, using Poisson statistics).
background & decay-corrected (d.c.) 60Fe/Fe-data. Surface and old layers are compatible with the measurement background obtained from chemistry blank samples. The age is based on the 26Al and 10Be data and tie-points of magnetic reversals.
‘conc’ means ‘concentration’. Stable iron content of the leached material as measured via ICP-MS (averaged values, see Methods). The average leachable Fe content for the four cores was measured to 0.18% (core Eltanin 49-53), 0.25% (45-16), 0.3% (45-21) and 0.45% (50-02). The mean dry density of the sediments was 1.16·g·cm−3.
for sediments with 100% incorporation efficiency the Fe deposition equals the terrestrial fluence.
uncertain by ~1 Myr.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by (1) the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project no. AI00428; (2) the Australian Research Council (ARC), project no. DP14100136; (3) the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 26800161; J.F. acknowledges a stipend (Abschlussstipendium) of the University of Vienna. We thank the Antarctic Marine Geology Research Facility, Florida State University, US (C. Sjunneskog) for providing the sediment cores, Prof. P. DeDeckker (ANU) for help in selecting the cores; JOGMEC, Japan for supplying the crust; Prof.s P. Martínez Arbizu and M. Türkay for providing the nodules. Stable isotope measurements were performed by A. Ritter and S. Gurlit (HZDR) and V. Guillouat (CEREGE, France). Support by M. Fröhlich, S. Akhmadaliev, S. Pavetich, R. Ziegenrücker and P. Collon is appreciated. We thank M. Lugaro and A. Karakas for information on (Super)AGB stars and D. Bourlès on dating methods in deep-sea sediments. We thank D. Schumann for providing 60Fe standard material.
Footnotes
Author Information: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information accompanies this paper on www.nature.com.
References
- 1.Diehl R. Nuclear astrophysics lessons from INTEGRAL. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2013;76:026301. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/76/2/026301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Timmes FX, Woosley SE. Gammy-ray line signals from 26Al and 60Fe in the Galaxies of the Local Group. Astrophys. J. 1997;481:L81. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ellis J, Fields BD, Schramm DN. Geological Isotope Anomalies as signatures of nearby supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1996;470:1227–1236. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Korschinek G, Faestermann T, Knie K, Schmidt C. 60Fe, a Promising AMS Isotope for Many Applications. Radiocarbon. 1996;38:68. abstract to AMS-conference AMS-7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fry BJ, Fields BD, Ellis JR. Astrophysical Shrapnel: Discriminating Among Extra-Earth Stellar Explosion Sources of Live Radioactive Isotopes. Astrophys. J. 2015;800:71. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wallner A, et al. Abundance of live 244Pu in deep-sea reservoirs on Earth points to rarity of actinide nucleosynthesis. Nature Communications. 2015;6:5956. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rugel G, et al. New measurement of the 60Fe half-life. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:072502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.072502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wallner A, et al. Settling the half-life of 60Fe – fundamental for a versatile astrophysical chronometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:041101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.041101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang W, et al. SPI observations of the diffuse 60Fe emission in the Galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. 2007;469:1005–1012. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Knie K, et al. Indication for Supernova Produced 60Fe Activity on Earth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999;83:18–21. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Knie K, et al. 60Fe anomaly in a deep-sea manganese crust and implications for a nearby supernova source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93:171103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maiz-Apellaniz J. The Origin of the Local Bubble. Astrophys. J. 2001;560:L83–L86. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Breitschwerdt D, de Avillez MA. The history and future of the Local and Loop I bubbles. Astron. Astrophys. 2006;452:L1–L5. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benitez N, Maiz-Apellaniz J, Canelles M. Evidence for Nearby Supernova Explosions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;88:081101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.081101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mann I. Interstellar Dust in the Solar System. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;48:173–203. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beech M. The past, present and future supernova threat to Earth’s biosphere. Astrophys. Space Science. 2011;336:287–303. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ruderman MA. Possible Consequences of Nearby Supernova Explosions for Atmospheric Ozone and Terrestrial Life. Science. 1974;184:1079–1081. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4141.1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fitoussi C, et al. Search for Supernova-Produced 60Fe in a Marine Sediment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;101:121101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.121101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stuart FM, Lee MR. Micrometeorites and extraterrestrial He in a ferromanganese crust from the Pacific Ocean. Chemical Geology. 2012;322–323:209–214. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Basu S, Stuart FM, Schnabel C, Klemm V. Galactic-cosmic-ray-produced 3He in a ferromanganese crust: any supernova 60Fe excess on Earth? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:141103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.141103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Feige J, et al. AMS measurements of cosmogenic and supernova-ejected radionuclides in deep-sea sediment cores. EPJ Web of Conf. 2013;63:03003. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fimiani L, et al. Evidence for Deposition of Interstellar Material on the Lunar Surface; Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Vol. 45.2014. p. 1778. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ludwig P. Search for 60Fe of supernova origin in Earth’s microfossil record. TU Munich; 2015. PhD thesis. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Woosley SE, Weaver TA. The evolution and explosion of massive stars. II. Explosive hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis. The Astrophys. J. Suppl. Series. 1995;101:181–235. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rauscher T, Heger A, Hoffman RD, Woosley SE. Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics. Astrophys. J. 2002;576:323–348. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Limongi M, Chieffi A. The Nucleosynthesis of 26Al and 60Fe in Solar Metallicity Stars Extending in Mass from 11 to 120 Mo: The Hydrostatic and Explosive Contributions. Astrophys. J. 2006;647:483–500. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wanajo S, Janka H-T, Müller B. Electron-Capture Supernovae as Sources of 60Fe. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2013;774:L6. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Doherty CL, Gil-Pons P, Lau HHB, Lattanzio JC, Siess L. Super and massive AGB stars - II. Nucleosynthesis and yields - Z = 0.02, 0.008 and 0.004. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2014;437:195–214. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Frisch PC, et al. The Galactic Environment of the Sun: Interstellar Material Inside and Outside of the Heliosphere. Space Sci. Rev. 2009;146:235–273. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Farley KA, Vokrouhlicky D, Bottke WF, Nesvorny D. A late Miocene dust shower from the break-up of an asteroid in the main belt. Nature. 2006;439:295–297. doi: 10.1038/nature04391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

