Skip to main content
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety logoLink to Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
. 2016 Apr 8;7(3):89–93. doi: 10.1177/2042098616643708

Safety of high-dose doripenem in adult patients with cystic fibrosis

Seth Strawbridge 1, Michael D Nailor 2,
PMCID: PMC4892408  PMID: 27298719

Abstract

Background:

High doses of β-lactam antibiotics have been advocated for acute pulmonary exacerbations caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) secondary to high minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the infecting organisms. Some β-lactam antibiotics have increased elimination in CF patients. This case series examines the safety of high-dose doripenem (HDD), 2 g intravenously every 8 hours, which is 4 times the labeled dose, in CF patients.

Methods:

This was a retrospective, single site, chart review of all CF patients given HDD during a 3-year period. Adverse events were prospectively defined using labeled definitions within the package insert and the medical literature. A standard case report form was used to collect demographic details, antibiotic lengths of therapy and adverse events.

Results:

A total of 17 patients (9 males), with a median age of 24 years, contributed 43 unique visits and 382 HDD exposure days. Mean duration of inpatient doripenem use was 8.9 days. Concurrent antibiotics were common, with a median number of additional antibiotics per admission of three. The median number of adverse effects documented was two. The most common adverse event was anemia, which was identified in 41 of 43 visits, but was present on admission in 31 instances. One patient developed leukopenia for 1 day, but returned to normal without dose adjustment. There were three instances of Clostridium difficile infection. One patient was documented to have an allergic reaction that led to discontinuation, but was ultimately rechallenged without adverse effect. Other common adverse events were gastrointestinal in origin. No other possible adverse effects led to discontinuation of the drug.

Conclusions:

In adult patients with CF, HDD in combination with other antibiotics did not lead to adverse effects necessitating discontinuation. HDD should be considered in this selected patient population, particularly when high MIC organisms are identified.

Keywords: adverse events, cystic fibrosis, doripenem, pharmacodynamics, safety

Introduction

Chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of acute pulmonary exacerbations (APEs) and hospitalizations in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Over 70% of adult CF patients are colonized with P. aeruginosa and are at risk for accelerated loss of pulmonary function and decreased survival [Parkins and Elborn, 2010; Gaspar et al. 2013]. Beta-lactam antibiotic therapy directed against P. aeruginosa is a critical component in the treatment of APEs in patients with CF. High doses are utilized in CF patients to overcome high minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by resistant pathogens, higher volumes of distribution, shorter halflives and difficulty achieving adequate concentrations in the bronchial secretions of CF patients compared with non-CF patients [Flume et al. 2009; Zobell et al. 2013].

Carbapenems have demonstrated to be bactericidal against many Gram-negative bacteria, including P. aeruginosa. Doripenem, the newest of the carbapenems, has shown to have 2–4 fold greater in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa than either meropenem or imipenem, and up to 32-fold greater activity than other antibiotics routinely used in patients with CF [Cirillo et al. 2009; Mandell, 2009; Paterson and Depestel, 2009; Jones et al. 2006; Castanheira et al. 2009]. Regimens with doses greater than the labeled maximum dose are needed to maximize the pharmacodynamic parameters that predict efficacy in high MIC organisms, namely 50% of time above the MIC [Goyal et al. 2012; Traczewski and Brown, 2006].

In order to achieve this pharmacodynamic target, Hartford Hospital has implemented a doripenem dosing protocol that utilizes high-dose doripenem (HDD) 2000 mg intravenously (IV) every 8 hours infused over 4 hours, in patients with CF. The objective of this project was to describe the prevalence and spectrum of adverse events of the HDD dosing strategy used at Hartford Hospital, 2000 mg IV administered every 8 hours over 4 hours, to treat APEs in patients with CF. A safety analysis of HDD is particularly important in light of a report documenting the potential utility and recommendation for this doripenem dosing scheme, while simultaneously describing that no Cystic Fibrosis Foundation accredited centers had reported using it or safety analysis of it utilizing multiple doses in adults [Zobell et al. 2012].

Methods

This study was a retrospective, observational chart review of patients aged 18 years or older admitted from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2012. Human subjects’ protection approval was granted by Hartford Hospital’s Investigational Review Board. To be included in the study, patients had to have a documented diagnosis of CF and received an order for the HDD regimen, namely, doripenem 2000 mg IV infused every 8 hours. Eligible patients were identified from data extracted from the pharmacy inpatient verification system. Each patient needed to receive at least one dose of HDD per the medication administration record to be included in the study.

For each identified patient admission, the electronic health record was reviewed for evidence of adverse events associated with doripenem administration listed in the package insert and identified through the US Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch program [Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 2009]. The adverse events investigated and associated with lab values included anemia (hemoglobin <13.7 g/dl for men and <12.2 g/dl for women), leukopenia (white blood cell count <3.0 × 109/l), neutropenia (polynuclear neutrophil count <1.5 × 109/l), thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 × 109/l), hepatic transaminase elevation (hepatic enzymes >3× upper limit of normal) and evidence of Clostridium difficile infection (a positive laboratory test for C. difficile antigens) [Beutler and Waalen, 2006; Abboud and Kaplowitz, 2007; Benichou, 1994]. Both the electronic health record database and provider notes were reviewed to assess for the occurrence of the following events: pruritus (a documented rash and/or the use of antihistamines), rash, headache, phlebitis, nausea (reported as nausea, emesis, or the use of antiemetics), diarrhea, oral candidiasis (documented candidiasis or the use of either oral nystatin or oral clotrimazole therapy), anaphylaxis reactions, seizures, toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens–Johnson Syndrome. Additional information collected included height, weight, serum creatinine, length of stay, and duration of HDD therapy. The safety profile of this HDD regimen was described by determining the prevalence of these known adverse events in the study population using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 18 patients with CF received orders for HDD 2000 mg infused every 8 hours from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2012. However, two patients never received HDD according to a review of the medication administration record. The remaining 16 patients met inclusion criteria and comprised the study population. The 16 patients contributed 43 unique admissions and 382 HDD exposure days. Patient demographic and admission data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of patient demographic and admission data.

Characteristic Result
Gender, n (%) 9 males (56.3%)
Ethnicity, n (%) 16 white (100%)
Age, median (IQR) 24 (21–37)
Length of stay, median (IQR) 11 (7–14)
Duration of doripenem therapy, median (IQR) 7 (4–13)
Concurrent antibiotics, median (IQR) 3 (2–4)
Serum creatinine, median (IQR) 0.5 (0.5–0.8)

IQR, interquartile range.

From the 43 patient admissions, 81 unique adverse events were discovered during the review, with a median of 2 events [interquartile range (IQR) 1–2)] per admission. Event occurrences and their associated incidence are summarized in Table 2. Anemia was the most common adverse event, occurring in 41 of the 43 admissions. However, anemia was present in 31 of the 41 admissions prior to the start of doripenem.

Table 2.

Summary of adverse event data.

Reaction Events Incidence
Anemia 41 95.3%
Diarrhea 11 25.6%
Nausea/vomiting/antiemetics 9 20.9%
Headache 6 14.0%
Clostridium difficile positive 3 7.0%
Oral candidiasis/oral nystatin 3 7.0%
Other 2 4.7%
Pruritus/antihistamines 2 4.7%
Rash 2 4.7%
Anaphylaxis 1 2.3%
Leukopenia 1 2.3%
Total 81

One patient had a dose reduction based on increased liver transaminases that did not meet prespecified criteria of three times the upper limit of normal. Additionally, one patient had a reported allergic reaction that occurred within 15 minutes of initiating doripenem that led to discontinuation. However, the patient was ultimately rechallenged with doripenem without adverse effect. No other treatment-related adverse events led to the discontinuation of HDD therapy. One patient developed leukopenia with a white blood cell count of 2.8 × 109/l on day 4 of doripenem administration. However, none of the subsequent readings met the predefined criteria for leukopenia and HDD was not discontinued in this patient. There were no documented or reported occurrences of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, phlebitis, seizures, Stevens–Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome that met the predefined criteria.

Concurrent antibiotics were common, with half of all patients receiving at least three per admission. Most concomitant antibiotics were initiated at the same time doripenem was initiated. Table 3 summarizes the concurrent antibiotic data.

Table 3.

Concurrent antibiotic orders.

Antibiotic Number of admissions with concurrent order
Azithromycin 23
Tobramycin 21
Minocycline 12
Aztreonam 11
Ceftazidime 10
Voriconazole 10
Levofloxacin 8
Piperacillin-tazobactam 7
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 7
Ciprofloxacin 5
Vancomycin 5
Fluconazole 4
Amikacin 3
Cefazolin 2
Cefepime 2
Linezolid 2
Meropenem 2
Tigecycline 2

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series in adults to evaluate the safety of administering doripenem 2 g IV every 8 hours for multiple doses in adult CF patients. Although the rate of adverse events in this study was high, the patients’ baseline disease states likely contributed significantly, and ultimately, the medication and dose were well tolerated. This is evident in that only one patient had a dose reduction of medication attributed to an adverse effect of HDD, which was secondary to an elevation in liver transaminases that were not above three times the upper limit of normal.

Two serious dose-dependent complications exist with carbapenem therapy: central nervous system toxicity, including seizures; and various blood dyscrasias including neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia [Norrby, 2000; Miller et al. 2011; Lagacé-Wiens and Rubinstein, 2012]. Rates of seizures with carbapenem therapy are reported to be <2% with standard dosing [Nicolau, 2008]. This study utilized a significantly higher dose of doripenem in this patient population with no reports of seizures. The rate of anemia in our study population was high, 95% of patient admissions utilizing HDD had anemia by the end of therapy, although 31 of 44 admissions the patient had anemia before beginning therapy. Anemia can be common in patients with CF and its prevalence has been reported to be >50% in adult patients [von Drygalski and Biller, 2008]. Anemia can arise from a multitude of reasons including spinocerebellar degeneration or hemolytic anemia because of vitamin E deficiency, iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic disease. Other hematological adverse events were rare.

Gastrointestinal adverse events were common in this population with diarrhea and nausea/emesis reported in 25.6% and 20.9% of admissions, respectively. Similar to anemia, these symptoms are common in the CF population resulting from pancreatic insufficiency which develops in up to 90% of patients with CF [O’Sullivan and Freedman, 2009].

Cirillo and colleagues examined the pharmacokinetics and safety of HDD in adult CF patients (n = 10) compared with healthy controls (n = 24). The study subjects received either a single dose of 1 g or 2 g. One patient did experience nausea and hypertension during the infusion that resulted in that patient being withdrawn. Seven treatment emergent adverse events were report in four patients, all of which were rated as mild to moderate [Cirillo et al. 2012]. Similar to our results, HDD in this population appeared to be tolerated. Higher doses of doripenem have also been utilized in pediatric patients. Zobell and colleagues described a case series of pediatric CF patients who received high doses of doripenem as a result of a national meropenem shortage. Patients received between 75 and 90 mg/kg/day of the drug in 3 divided doses utilizing an infusion of 1 hour. Possible adverse reactions to the drug were mild in nature and did not require discontinuation [Zobell et al. 2014].

The causality of the relationship between the incidences of the adverse events identified and HDD in this study cannot be determined due to the retrospective design, concurrent antibiotics administered, and the underlying disease state of patients.

Conclusion

Based on this case series results, we conclude that HDD, in combination with other antibiotics, did not lead to adverse events necessitating discontinuation of therapy. HDD should be considered in adult patients with CF, particularly when organisms with high MICs to doripenem are identified and therapeutic alternatives are not available.

Footnotes

Funding: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest statement: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: M.D.N. has received honoraria for consulting and speaker bureau fees from Astellas Pharmaceuticals and honoraria for consulting from Merck Pharmaceuticals. S.S. has no conflicts of interest to disclose in preparing this article.

Contributor Information

Seth Strawbridge, Pharmacy Services, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.

Michael D. Nailor, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, 69 North Eagleville Road, Unit 3092, Storrs, CT 06268, USA.

References

  1. Abboud G., Kaplowitz N. (2007) Drug-induced liver injury. Drug Saf 30: 277–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benichou C. (1994) Adverse Drug Reactions: A Practical Guide to Diagnosis and Management. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beutler E., Waalen J. (2006) The definition of anemia: what is the lower limit of normal of the blood hemoglobin concentration? Blood 107: 1747–1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Castanheira M., Jones R., Livermore D. (2009) Antimicrobial activities of doripenem and other carbapenems against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, other nonfermentative bacilli, and Aeromonas spp. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 63: 426–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cirillo I., Vaccaro N., Redman R., Black P., Kearns G. (2012) Pharmacokinetics of single-dose doripenem in adults with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Pharmacol 52: 1645–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cirillo I., Vaccaro N., Turner K., Solanki B., Natarajan J., Redman R. (2009) Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of doripenem after 0.5-, 1-, and 4-hour infusions in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 49: 798–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flume P., Mogayzel P., Robinson K., Goss C., Rosenblatt R., Kuhn R., et al. (2009) Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines: treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180: 802–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaspar M., Couet W., Olivier J., Pais A., Sousa J. (2013) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis lung disease and new perspectives of treatment: a review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32: 1231–1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goyal K., Gautam V., Ray P. (2012) Doripenem versus meropenem against Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Indian J Med Microbiol 30: 350–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones R., Stillwell M., Sader H., Fritsche T. (2006) Uniformly enhanced activity of doripenem compared to other carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem) when testing P. aeruginosa isolates. Int J Infect Dis 10: S127–S128. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lagacé-Wiens P., Rubinstein E. (2012) Adverse reactions to β-lactam antimicrobials. Expert Opin Drug Saf 11: 381–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mandell L. (2009) Doripenem: a new carbapenem in the treatment of nosocomial infection. Clin Infect Dis 49(Suppl. 1): S1–S3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller A., Ball A., Bookstaver P., Dornblaser E., Bennett C. (2011) Epileptogenic potential of carbapenem agents: mechanism of action, seizure rates, and clinical considerations. Pharmacotherapy 31: 408–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nicolau D. (2008) Carbapenems: a potent class of antibiotics. Expert Opin Pharmacother 9: 23–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Norrby S. (2000) Carbapenems in serious infections: a risk-benefit assessment. Drug Saf 22: 191–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals (2009) Doribax (doripenem) package insert. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Sullivan B., Freedman S. (2009) Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 373: 1891–1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parkins M., Elborn J. (2010) Newer antibacterial agents and their potential role in cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation management. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 1853–1861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paterson D., Depestel D. (2009) Doripenem. Clin Infect Dis 49: 291–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Traczewski M., Brown S. (2006) In vitro activity of doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia isolates from both cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 819–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Von Drygalski A., Biller J. (2008) Anemia in cystic fibrosis: incidence, mechanisms, and association with pulmonary function and vitamin deficiency. Nutr Clin Pract 23: 557–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zobell J., Kemper A., Young D. (2014). The use of doripenem in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients in case of meropenem shortages. Pediatr Pulmonol 49: E48–E51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zobell J., Waters C., Young D., Stockmann C., Ampofo K., Sherwin C., et al. (2013) Optimization of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations: II. cephalosporins and penicillins. Pediatr Pulmonol 48: 107–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zobell J., Young D., Waters C., Stockmann C., Ampofo K., Sherwin C., et al. (2012) Optimization of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations: I. aztreonam and carbapenems. Pediatr Pulmonol 47: 1147–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES