R. Soc. open. sci. 3, 150526. (2016; Published 24 February 2016). (doi:10.1098/rsos.150526)
Amendment to table 2
Table 2.
Communities from cities on the left can be used to replicate cities indicated by a tick.
| communities from | Bi. | Ed. | Gl. | No. | Ca. | Sh. | Br. | Le. | Ma. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Edinburgh | ✓ | ||||||||
| Glasgow | ✓ | ||||||||
| Nottingham | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Cardiff | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Sheffield | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Bristol | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Leeds | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Manchester | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
The first few rows are amended so that the table is now in line with figure 4 and corresponds to the text. Additionally, it highlights that Nottingham, Cardiff, Sheffield, Bristol and Manchester are alike cities.