Fig 2 is incorrectly duplicated from Fig 1 and Fig 3. The authors have provided a corrected version here.
Fig 2. Constant actinic light PAM experiment.
(a) Comparison between the predicted and measured fluorescence fluxes (triangles), (squares) and F′ (circles) in response to a constant light experiment. The grey-shaded area represents the light intensity. (b) Measured value of qNPQ, defined as , during the recovery phase of experiment Exp2 along with predicted values using different modelling assumptions. The dashed lines consider a first-order model to represent NPQ; the solid line considers the NPQ as the combined effect of two interdependent processes with different time scales.
Reference
- 1.Bernardi A, Nikolaou A, Meneghesso A, Morosinotto T, Chachuat B, Bezzo F (2016) High-Fidelity Modelling Methodology of Light-Limited Photosynthetic Production in Microalgae. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0152387 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

