Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2016 Apr 28;67(11):3367–3381. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw166

Effects of down-regulating ornithine decarboxylase upon putrescine-associated metabolism and growth in Nicotiana tabacum L.

Heidi L Dalton 1,2, Cecilia K Blomstedt 1, Alan D Neale 3, Ros Gleadow 1, Kathleen D DeBoer 4, John D Hamill 3,*
PMCID: PMC4892731  PMID: 27126795

Highlight

RNAi-mediated reduction of ornithine decarboxylase gene activity in tobacco has negative effects on plant growth and leads to widespread alterations in primary and secondary metabolism, particularly in wounded plants.

Key words: Alkaloid, gene expression, ODC, phenolamide, polyamine, putrescine, PMT, QPT, RNAi.

Abstract

Transgenic plants of Nicotiana tabacum L. homozygous for an RNAi construct designed to silence ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) had significantly lower concentrations of nicotine and nornicotine, but significantly higher concentrations of anatabine, compared with vector-only controls. Silencing of ODC also led to significantly reduced concentrations of polyamines (putrescine, spermidine and spermine), tyramine and phenolamides (caffeoylputrescine and dicaffeoylspermidine) with concomitant increases in concentrations of amino acids ornithine, arginine, aspartate, glutamate and glutamine. Root transcript levels of S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, S-adenosyl methionine synthase and spermidine synthase (polyamine synthesis enzymes) were reduced compared with vector controls, whilst transcript levels of arginine decarboxylase (putrescine synthesis), putrescine methyltransferase (nicotine production) and multi-drug and toxic compound extrusion (alkaloid transport) proteins were elevated. In contrast, expression of two other key proteins required for alkaloid synthesis, quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase (nicotinic acid production) and a PIP-family oxidoreductase (nicotinic acid condensation reactions), were diminished in roots of odc-RNAi plants relative to vector-only controls. Transcriptional and biochemical differences associated with polyamine and alkaloid metabolism were exacerbated in odc-RNAi plants in response to different forms of shoot damage. In general, apex removal had a greater effect than leaf wounding alone, with a combination of these injury treatments producing synergistic responses in some cases. Reduced expression of ODC appeared to have negative effects upon plant growth and vigour with some leaves of odc-RNAi lines being brittle and bleached compared with vector-only controls. Together, results of this study demonstrate that ornithine decarboxylase has important roles in facilitating both primary and secondary metabolism in Nicotiana.

Introduction

Terrestrial plants have been subjected to herbivory since their emergence onto land ca. 450 million years ago and a wide array of physical and chemical defence systems have evolved to provide protection and facilitate their reproduction in native environments (Labandeira, 1998; Wellman and Gray, 2000). Alkaloids represent a diverse grouping of such chemical defences, with many thousands of chemical structures distributed widely across the plant kingdom (Aniszewshi, 2015). Biosynthesis of alkaloids generally involves the diversion of amino acid precursors from primary into secondary metabolism via the action of decarboxylases and is often enhanced by exposure of plants to biotic and/or abiotic stress conditions (Shoji and Hashimoto, 2013a).

The genus Nicotiana (family Solanaceae) contains more than 75 species, native mainly to the Americas and mainland Australia, with representatives also on South Pacific islands and in southern Africa (Knapp et al., 2004). The genus is well known for its production of a range of pyridine alkaloids, particularly nicotine, nornicotine, anabasine and anatabine, which are found at various concentrations in all Nicotiana species (Saitoh et al., 1985). Acting as agonists on the nervous system of herbivores, both invertebrate and vertebrate, they discourage feeding and increase the rate of herbivore mortality and/or susceptibility to predatory attack (Steppuhn et al., 2004). Figure 1 provides an overview of alkaloid biosynthesis in N. tabacum and its relationship with other aspects of putrescine metabolism.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Schematic diagram of the biosynthesis of polyamines and connections with other metabolic pathways, including pyridine alkaloid, phenolamide and phenylpropanoid metabolism, in N. tabacum (adapted from Cane et al., 2005; Onkokesung et al., 2012; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2012; Winter et al., 2015). Solid lines indicate defined steps, while dotted lines indicate undefined steps or steps including multiple reactions. Both pyridine alkaloid and polyamine/phenolamide metabolites share early biosynthetic steps, starting from arginine and ornithine to produce putrescine. The biosynthesis of alkaloids in tobacco occurs mainly in roots, while the phenolamide and phenylpropanoid pathways are present predominantly in above-ground (leaf) tissues. The final condensation reactions with nicotinic acid derivatives and N-methyl pyrrolinium cation are not yet clear; however, it is suggested that a PIP-family isoflavone reductase-like protein, A622, is involved in the late step of synthesis of the pyridine moiety prior to synthesis steps involving enzymes from a Berberine Bridge Like gene family. Several toxin transport proteins including MATEs and NUP1 are involved in vacuolar storage and transport of alkaloids to aerial tissues (Shoji et al., 2009; Morita et al., 2009; Hildreth et al., 2011; Shitan et al., 2014a,b).

Synthesis of the alkaloid nicotine has been reported to be energy demanding (Bush et al., 1999) and diversion of nitrogen from primary metabolism, growth and reproduction into synthesis of this defence compound can also have fitness costs, as demonstrated in N. attentata growing in native environments (Baldwin et al., 1990; Baldwin and Ohnmeiss, 1994; Ohnmeiss and Baldwin, 2000). Experiments with cultivated N. tabacum, and also native species N. sylvestris and N. attenuata, showed that damage to aerial tissues led to an increase in nicotine content of leaves within several days of wounding (Saunders and Bush, 1979; Baldwin, 1989; Baldwin and Ohnmeiss, 1993; Baldwin and Ohnmeiss, 1994; Sinclair et al., 2004). Studies in Nicotiana have attributed the transmission of wound signals resulting from leaf damage and apex removal (topping) from aerial to root tissues to increased JA and reduced auxin levels, respectively (Baldwin et al., 1994; Baldwin et al., 1996; Shi et al., 2006). Recent reports indicate that a convergence of both JA and auxin cross-signalling networks is likely to operate at the molecular level in vivo through shared components of these transduction pathways (Pauwels et al., 2010; Hentrich et al., 2013; He and Zhao, 2015). Transcription of key structural genes required for alkaloid biosynthesis is regulated via the action of several transcription factors, including MYC2 and APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (AP2/ERF) types, which are themselves regulated by these hormones (reviewed in Dewey and Xie, 2013; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2013a). Alkaloid transport from roots to the aerial tissues occurs via the xylem system, with loading/unloading into the xylem and storage in leaf vacuoles involving several MULTIDRUG AND TOXIC COMPOUND EXTRUSION (MATE)-type transporters, as well as NICOTINE UPTAKE PERMEASE (NUP1) proteins (Morita et al., 2009; Shitan et al., 2009; Shoji et al., 2009; Hildreth et al., 2011; Shitan et al., 2014a; Shitan et al., 2014b; Kato et al., 2014).

The diamine putrescine is an important intermediate precursor in the synthesis of higher amines, spermidine and spermine, which play important roles in metabolic, physiological and developmental processes in all living organisms (Fariduddin et al., 2013; Kusano and Suzuki, 2015). In most plant species, putrescine can be synthesized from either ornithine or arginine via the activity of the decarboxylating enzymes, ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE (ODC) or ARGININE DECARBOXYLASE (ADC), respectively (Shoji and Hashimoto, 2013a; Michael, 2015). Plant polyamines exist predominantly as conjugates with hydroxycinnamic acids in the Solanaceae family, collectively described as phenolamides (Fig. 1; Smith et al., 1983; Martin-Tanguy, 1985; Kaur et al., 2010; Onkokesung et al., 2012). Such conjugated polyamines have been reported to occur throughout the plant kingdom and appear to have roles in chemical defence as well as aspects of plant development (Kaur et al., 2010; Fellenberg et al., 2012; Onkokesung et al., 2012).

In many solanaceous genera, putrescine is also an important precursor for alkaloid synthesis, including nicotine and nornicotine (reviewed in Dewey and Xie, 2013; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2013a). Synthesis of nicotine involves the condensation of a nicotinic acid-derived pyridine ring, sourced from the pyridine nucleotide cycle, with a pyrrolidine ring derived from putrescine (Dewey and Xie, 2013; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2013a). A further step involving the N-demethylation of nicotine is the primary means of producing nornicotine (Siminszky et al., 2005; Lewis et al., 2008; Lewis et al., 2010). Anatabine, the other main alkaloid in N. tabacum, is derived entirely from two molecules of nicotinic acid (Leete and Slattery, 1976; Leete, 1992). Using antisense and RNAi methodology, our previous studies indicated that marked reductions in ODC, but not ADC, transcript levels had a marked effect on the capacity of transgenic N. tabacum to synthesize nicotine (Chintapakorn and Hamill, 2007; DeBoer et al., 2011a). In the current study, utilizing T2 generation plants of N. tabacum homozygous for an introduced odc-RNAi construct (DeBoer et al., 2011a), we undertook a detailed analysis of the effects of down-regulating ODC upon the production of amines and associated pools of amino acids, as well as the changes in defence chemistry and components of the associated root transcriptome.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Homozygous T2 plants were generated from transgenic N. tabacum (SC 58 variety, AABB genotype; Chaplin, 1966; Cane et al., 2005) lines At-Nt odc-RNAi-3 and At-Nt-odc-RNAi-4 plants, which were described fully in DeBoer et al. (2011a). Comparable T2 homozygous plants containing the T-DNA insert from an empty pART27 vector (vector-only control; VC) were used as a transformation control. These plants were identical in growth habit and morphology to those of non-transgenic parental line SC 58. Seeds of all lines were surface-sterilized and germinated in vitro on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar plates containing 3% sucrose and 75 μg mL−1 kanamycin sulphate according to Chintapakorn and Hamill (2003) and maintained in a 25 °C/16h photoperiod and allowed to grow for ~4 weeks before transfer to 250mL glass jars containing 50mL of agar-solidified MS medium. Two weeks later seedlings (~4–6 leaf stage) were placed in rockwool blocks and transferred to communal hydroponic trays to acclimatize for a further 2 weeks before being placed in individual hydroponic containers each containing 200mL of full strength Hoagland’s medium, formulated as described previously (Cane et al., 2005). Hydroponic chambers were randomly distributed on a communal bench at 20cm intervals in an insect-proof (PC2) glasshouse at 25±2 °C and plants grown under uniform supplemental fluorescent lighting and a 16/8h photoperiod, with bi-weekly media changes and daily liquid replenishment to 200mL with deionized water as described in previous work (DeBoer et al., 2009; DeBoer et al., 2011a; DeBoer et al., 2013). For further seed production, additional seedlings of each line (~4–6 leaf stage) were grown on a common damp mat in the same greenhouse at 25±2 °C, under ambient lighting, in 250mL pots of compost (3 parts seed raising mix : 1 part perlite) containing a single application of controlled release complete fertilizer (Osmocote®, 15g L−1 of compost mix) as recommended by the manufacturer (Scotts Australia Pty Ltd).

Plant treatments

After 4 weeks growth in hydroponics, transgenic N. tabacum plants (~10–12 leaf stage) either remained non-wounded (C) or were mechanically injured in one of three ways as follows. (1) Designated ‘W’ for wounded; a fabric pattern wheel was drawn across the lamina twice on each side of the mid-vein of the two uppermost (>50%) expanded leaves to simulate insect attack (Ohnmeiss and Baldwin, 1994). (2) Designated ‘A’ for apex removal; a sharp scalpel blade was used to remove the shoot apex and young leaves (less than 50% expanded) to simulate ‘topping’ (Saunders and Bush, 1979; Bush et al., 1999). (3) Designated ‘W+A’; a combination of both damage treatments was used. Unless otherwise stated, chemical analysis was performed using wounded leaves or the two leaves located immediately below the apex removal point. Tissues were harvested 24h or 7 days after treatment for RNA or metabolite analysis, respectively, in line with previous work from this laboratory (Cane et al., 2005; DeBoer et al., 2009; DeBoer et al., 2011a; DeBoer et al., 2013). In non-damaged control plants, cotton thread was tied loosely around the petiole of phyllotactically equivalent leaves on day 0, with these leaves being harvested for analysis at the same time point as in damaged plants.

Targeted analysis of leaf and root primary and secondary metabolites

Concentrations of amino acids, amines, alkaloids and phenolamides were determined using portions of homogeneous powdered tissue that had previously been freeze-dried for a minimum of 48h. One hundred milligrams of freeze-dried ground leaf or root powder was pre-weighed and aliquoted into 1.5mL Eppendorf tubes containing a sterile stainless steel ball to aid extraction for subsequent metabolite analyses. Alkaloids and phenolamides were extracted from leaf and root samples using an optimized 40% methanol extraction method described by Gaquerel et al. (2010). Amino acids were analysed and quantified by LC-MS/MS. Samples were prepared as reported above for alkaloid analysis and aliquots of the supernatant were diluted and analysed as described by Jander et al. (2004). Amines (putrescine, spermidine, spermine and tyramine) were extracted using an optimized hydrochloric and boric acid extraction and supernatant aliquots were analysed as ortho-phthaldialdehyde/ethanethiol/fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl derivatives as described by Fellenberg et al. (2012). Concentrations of amino acids, amines, alkaloids and phenolamides were quantified relative to known concentrations of standards and are graphically presented per milligram dry weight of tissue sample that was extracted.

Quantitative real time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from leaf and root tissues snap-frozen in liquid N2 using a hot phenol method adapted from Verwoerd et al. (1989) and previously found to be suitable for extraction of high quality RNA from both leaf and root tissue of Nicotiana species (Cane et al., 2005; DeBoer et al., 2011a). DNase treated RNA was reverse transcribed with Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using oligo (dT) 18 following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with approximately 150ng of cDNA on a Lightcycler 480 real-time instrument (Roche) using SensiMixTM SYBR no-ROX (Bioline) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Previously published gene-specific primers (Shoji et al., 2008; Shoji et al., 2010; Schmidt and Delaney, 2010; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2011) were used, with slight modifications where stated, so that each primer pair combination produced an amplicon of ~100bp representing all known respective gene family members (see Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online). Results were obtained from analysis of three independent samples per treatment, each containing three technical replicates. Data were analysed using the 2–ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) and are presented as the fold change in gene expression for that particular gene family, each normalized to elongation factor 1α (EF1α) and relative to the corresponding non-wounded VC at time-zero.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were performed using R 3.1.2 (http://www.r-project.org/) and R-Studio (v.0.98.976, http://www.rstudio.com/).

Results

Down-regulation of ODC reduces concentrations of amines in leaves and roots

Concentrations of polyamines in both leaves and roots, and tyramine in roots, were significantly lower in non-wounded odc-RNAi transgenic plants compared with corresponding tissues of non-wounded VC plants (Fig. 2A–D). Concentrations of each amine in VC plants increased following wounding treatments, being particularly evident for tyramine, which showed significant increases of ~250–500% in leaf tissues of plants damaged by leaf wounding and apex removal, respectively (Fig. 2A–D). In general, odc-RNAi transgenics showed a reduced capacity to increase concentrations of these amines in leaves and roots in response to damage of aerial tissues, and no cases were observed where concentrations were elevated significantly above levels present in corresponding tissues of non-wounded VC plants (Fig 2A–D).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Down-regulation of ODC influences levels of amines in leaf and root tissues of non-wounded and wounded N. tabacum plants. Four weeks after transfer to hydroponics, VC and odc-RNAi transgenic plants were left non-wounded (C), mechanically damaged with a pattern wheel applied to the two uppermost expanded leaves (W), wounded by removing (‘topping’) the apical region containing leaves that were less than 50% expanded (A), or subjected to a combination of both wounding treatments (W+A). Phyllotactic equivalent leaves from untreated plants that were not damaged were analysed as a wounding control comparison. Mean (±SE) putrescine (A), spermidine (B), spermine (C), and tyramine (D) content (nmol) per gram dry weight (wt) in the two uppermost expanded leaves (top panel) or root tissues (bottom panel) harvested from odc-RNAi transgenic vs. VC plants 7 d post-wounding and quantified by UHPLC. Significantly different concentrations of amines among the genotypes and treatment groups at P<0.05 were determined by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test and are indicated by different letters (n=4).

Analysis of pyridine alkaloids and phenolamides in odc-RNAi plants

As anticipated (Hamill et al., 1986; Parr and Hamill, 1987), pyridine alkaloid analysis of upper leaves and roots of non-wounded N. tabacum VC plants revealed mainly nicotine, with lower concentrations of anatabine and nornicotine also being present (Fig. 3A–C). The two uppermost expanded leaves of non-wounded VC plants contained ~1.3mg nicotine g−1 dwt, with similar concentrations of nicotine observed in the roots (Fig. 3A). Nornicotine levels were 100-fold lower than nicotine in these leaves (~12 µg g−1 dwt) and 25-fold lower in roots (50 µg g−1 dwt; Fig. 3B). Anatabine levels were also low in non-wounded VC plants, being ~50 µg g−1 dwt in leaves and at trace levels in roots (Fig. 3C). Consistent with previous observations of T1 odc-RNAi transgenics (DeBoer et al., 2011a), analysis of alkaloid concentrations in non-wounded T2 odc-RNAi plants revealed markedly different profiles from correspondingly non-wounded VC plants. Nicotine concentrations were significantly reduced in roots and uppermost expanded leaves of non-wounded odc-RNAi plants (Fig. 3A). Nornicotine concentrations in non-wounded odc-RNAi plants were also significantly reduced, dropping to ~8 µg g−1 dwt in leaves and ~35 µg g−1 dwt in roots (Fig. 3B). In marked contrast, anatabine concentrations were significantly elevated in leaves of non-wounded odc-RNAi plants, rising to ~600 µg g−1 dwt, which was >10-fold higher than in non-wounded VC plants. Unlike non-wounded VC plants, anatabine was also readily detectable in roots of non-wounded odc-RNAi plants (~200 µg g−1 dwt; Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

Down-regulation of ODC affects capacity to accumulate pyridine alkaloids and phenolamides in non-wounded and wounded N. tabacum plants. Leaves of VC and odc-RNAi transgenic plants were treated and harvested 7 d post-treatment as described in Fig. 2. Shown are the mean (±SE) concentrations of nicotine (A), nornicotine (B), and anatabine (C) in the two uppermost expanded leaves (top panel) and root tissue (bottom panel) from odc-RNAi vs. VC plants, and concentration of caffeoylputrescine (D) and dicaffeoylspermidine (E) in the two uppermost expanded leaves. Roots were analysed for phenolamides but these were present at trace levels and not quantifiable in most cases. Significant differences (P<0.05) between the lines and treatment groups were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test and are indicated by letters (n=4). A, apex removed; C, control; W, leaf wounded; W+A, wound plus apex removal.

Wounding of VC plants had a stimulatory effect on the concentrations of all alkaloids in leaves and roots, with combined leaf wounding and apex removal causing the greatest increase in both leaves and roots of plants. In the latter treatment group, there was a ~3.5-fold increase in nicotine content of leaves (rising to ~4mg g−1 dwt) and a ~2-fold increase in nicotine content of roots (rising to ~2.4mg g−1 dwt); a ~2-fold increase in nornicotine concentrations (rising to ~20 μg−1 dwt in leaves and ~80 μg−1 dwt in roots); and a ~10-fold increase in anatabine concentrations (rising to ~1mg g−1 in leaves and ~250 μg−1 dwt in roots; Fig. 3A–C). Alkaloid analysis of odc-RNAi plants that had been subjected to either the apex removal or combined leaf-wounding and apex-removal treatment showed some capacity to increase concentrations of nicotine and nornicotine, but levels in both leaves and roots were never significantly higher than in comparable tissues of non-wounded VC plants (Fig 3A–B). On the other hand, anatabine concentrations were significantly elevated across all wounding treatments in odc-RNAi plants, representing an increase of 50–70% over that of similarly damaged VC plants. Thus, anatabine concentrations reached a maximum of ~2.5mg g−1 dwt in leaves and ~750 μg g−1 dwt in roots of odc-RNAi plants that experienced the combined apex removal and leaf wounding treatment, compared with ~1.2mg g−1 dwt in leaves and ~250 μg g−1 dwt in roots of comparable VC plants (Fig. 3C).

Wounding of VC plants produced significant increases in caffeoylputrescine and dicaffeoylspermidine concentrations compared with non-wounded counterparts (Fig. 3D–E). The stimulatory effects on phenolamide concentrations varied in magnitude in relation to the damage inflicted, with leaf-only wounded < apex removal < combined leaf wounding and apex removal treatment (Fig. 3D–E). Concentrations of caffeoylputrescine and dicaffeoylspermidine were reduced significantly in leaves of non-wounded odc-RNAi plants relative to non-wounded VC plants (Fig. 3D–E). Unlike VC plants, wounding produced no stimulatory effect upon caffeolyputrescine concentrations in the odc-RNAi lines (Fig. 3D). Dicaffeoylspermidine concentrations were elevated 3- to 4-fold in odc-RNAi plants that experienced apex removal, but total levels remained significantly lower compared with similarly damaged VC plants (Fig. 3E).

Amino acid analysis of odc-RNAi versus vector control plants

Silencing of ODC resulted in a significant increase (2- to 3-fold) in baseline levels of ornithine in leaf and root tissues of non-wounded odc-RNAi transgenics compared with VC plants (Fig. 4). Ornithine concentrations in leaf tissues were not increased further in response to wounding in either VC or odc-RNAi plants. Roots of VC plants also did not show an increase in ornithine concentrations as a result of any of the wounding treatments. However, in the roots of odc-RNAi transgenics, ornithine concentrations were significantly enhanced (~3-fold) by leaf wounding alone and by apex removal (5- to 6-fold) relative to similarly treated VC plants (Fig. 4). Interestingly, odc-RNAi plants also showed significant increases in baseline concentrations of arginine in leaf (20–25%) and root (30–40%) tissues compared with VC plants. Wounding did not significantly alter arginine concentrations in leaves of VC plants but there was a significant, albeit <2-fold, increase in arginine concentration of roots in response to the combined leaf wounding and apex removal treatment (Fig 4). Wounding increased arginine concentrations further in root, but not leaf, tissues of odc-RNAi plants relative to comparable VC controls (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Down-regulation of ODC affects accumulation of inter-related amino acids in non-wounded and wounded N. tabacum plants. VC and odc-RNAi transgenic plants were treated and harvested 7 d post-treatment as described in Fig. 2. The schematic diagram depicts a simplified version of the metabolic connections between various related amino acids, pyridine nucleotide cycle components, polyamines (putrescine and spermidine), and pyridine alkaloid (nicotine) metabolic pathways. Solid lines indicate single defined steps, while dotted lines indicate steps composed of multiple reactions. Mean (±SE) arginine, aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, and ornithine content (nmol) per gram dry weight (wt) in the two uppermost expanded leaves and roots (top and bottom panels, respectively, in each pair of graphs) from vector-only vs. odc-RNAi transgenic plants. Significantly different levels of amino acids among the lines at P<0.05 were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test and are indicated by different letters (n=4).

Baseline leaf and root glutamate concentrations were increased by 20–25% in odc-RNAi transgenics compared with VC counterparts (Fig. 4). Similarly, silencing of ODC resulted in higher baseline concentrations of glutamine relative to non-wounded vector plants. In both odc-RNAi and VC plants, glutamine levels did not increase in response to leaf wounding alone, but interestingly did increase ~2-fold in leaf tissues as a result of apex removal. Glutamine levels were 20–30% higher in these apex removed odc-RNAi plants than in corresponding VC plants (Fig. 4). Aspartate levels were generally 20–35% higher in non-wounded and wounded odc-RNAi plants, relative to correspondingly treated VC plants. In all genotypes, there was a 20–30% increase in aspartate levels of leaf, but not root, tissues of plants wounded by apex removal or combined with leaf damage relative to comparable non-wounded plants (Fig. 4).

Analysis of key polyamine and alkaloid biosynthetic gene activity in roots of odc-RNAi versus vector control plants

As alkaloid synthesis occurs predominantly in roots of N. tabacum (Dewey and Xie, 2013 and references therein), we undertook a detailed comparative analysis of transcript abundance relating to genes of alkaloid and polyamine metabolism in roots of odc-RNAi transgenics vs. VC plants. Consistent with previous studies involving wounded N. tabacum (Cane et al., 2005; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2011 and references therein), analysis of VC plants 1 day post-treatment showed that leaf wounding only, apex removal only, and both leaf wounding and apex removal in combination generally caused progressively larger increases in transcript levels of genes involved in putrescine and spermidine synthesis (ODC, ADC and SPDS) and also alkaloid production and mobilization (A622, PMT, QPT and MATE) (Fig. 5). In contrast, transcript levels of other genes involved in polyamine synthesis either remained relatively constant (SAMDC) or were reduced (SAMS) in roots of wounded vs. non-wounded VC control plants (Fig 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

The effect of wounding on root transcript levels of key genes involved in polyamine and pyridine alkaloid synthesis in vector-only control and odc-RNAi plants. RNA was extracted from roots harvested 24h after wounding treatments as described in Fig. 2. Data shown in the schematic diagram represent the average (±SE) transcript abundance of designated alkaloid- and polyamine-associated genes normalized to the endogenous reference gene (EF1α) and relative to the non-wounded VC control at time-zero, which was arbitrarily designated as ‘1’. Significant differences (P<0.05) in levels of transcripts among VC and odc-RNAi plants were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test and are indicated by letters (n=4). For description of abbreviations see Fig. 1.

Consistent with a previous study involving T1 odc-RNAi plants (DeBoer et al., 2011a), ODC transcript levels were reduced by >95% in T2 odc-RNAi plants compared with VC plants, and did not increase significantly even after the combined wounding treatments (Fig. 5). The ADC wound response was enhanced in odc-RNAi plants where we observed significantly higher (~2- to 3-fold) levels of ADC transcript in roots of wounded odc-RNAi plants compared with VC counterparts, increasing in magnitude with plants damaged by leaf wounding < apex removal < combined leaf wounding and apex removal treatments (Fig. 5). Silenced ODC plants also displayed ~1.5- to 2-fold higher basal and wound-elicited levels of PMT transcript compared with VC plants. Basal transcript levels of MATE were similar in non-wounded VC and odc-RNAi plants. However, following wounding, we observed significantly higher levels of MATE transcripts in roots of odc-RNAi plants than in corresponding VC plants (Fig. 5). Interestingly, and unexpectedly, basal QPT transcript levels in roots of non-wounded odc-RNAi plants were found to be significantly lower (~3-fold) than in comparable VC plants. We observed even greater relative differences in roots of wounded odc-RNAi plants, where QPT transcript levels were 5- to 6-fold lower than in similarly wounded VC plants. Even in plants that experienced the most severe combined leaf wounding and apex removal treatment, QPT transcript levels of odc-RNAi plants were not significantly elevated above levels observed in non-wounded VC plants (Fig 5). Transcript levels of A622 in roots of wounded odc-RNAi plants were also significantly lower than in VC counterparts, albeit the magnitude of reduction was much less pronounced than was observed for QPT (Fig. 5).

Transcript levels of genes encoding polyamine-related enzymes were also clearly altered in odc-RNAi plants compared with VC plants. SPDS was significantly up-regulated in roots in response to leaf wounding (~5-fold) and/or apex removal (6- to 7-fold) in VC plants, compared with non-wounded counterparts. A marked reduction (~50%) in relative baseline SPDS transcript levels was observed in non-wounded odc-RNAi plants compared with VC plants. This difference was further exacerbated in wounded odc-RNAi plants, with SPDS transcript levels being 75–80% lower than that of similarly wounded VC plants. Silencing of ODC also resulted in ~1.5- to 2-fold reductions in relative SAMS and SAMDC transcript levels in both non-wounded and wounded odc-RNAi-plants, compared with appropriate VC plants (Fig. 5).

Effects of silencing ODC upon the spatial distribution of polyamine, alkaloid and phenolamide metabolites in decapitated N. tabacum plants

Experiments were performed to assess the effects of removing plant apices upon spatial distribution of polyamines, pyridine alkaloids and phenolamides throughout the plant (Figs 6–7). One week after apex removal, older leaves located progressively lower on the stem of plants, together with the stem tissue and roots of each plant, were analysed and compared with levels of these metabolites in phyllotactic equivalent tissues of non-wounded plants. In concurrence with previous experiments noted above, apical bud tissues, leaves, stem and root tissues from non-wounded odc-RNAi transgenic plants contained significantly lower concentrations of polyamines, tyramine, nicotine/nornicotine and phenolamides, compared with equivalent tissues in VC plants (Figs 6–7). The capacity to increase polyamines, tyramine, nicotine/nornicotine and phenolamide concentrations in response to apex removal was also significantly compromised in odc-RNAi plants compared with VC plants with the largest differences between both groups of plants being detected in upper (younger) leaves, as well as in the stem and roots. Tyramine concentrations were also lower in leaves and roots of wounded odc-RNAi lines than in VC plants but, interestingly, the converse was true in stem tissues where levels were ~2-fold higher in wounded odc-RNAi lines compared with similarly wounded VC plants (Fig. 6). Consistent with our previous study involving T1 odc-RNAi transgenic plants (DeBoer et al., 2011a), the present study found that anatabine concentrations were significantly elevated in roots and leaves of T2 odc-RNAi plants, both non-wounded and wounded, compared with corresponding tissues of VC plants (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Open in a new tab

The spatial distribution of amines in non-wounded and wounded vector-only control and odc-RNAi plants. Four weeks after transfer to hydroponics, pre-flowering VC and odc-RNAi transgenic plants were either left unwounded (C) or were wounded by removing the apex, along with leaves less than 50% expanded (A). Different tissues were harvested and quantified for amines 7 d post-treatment. Mean (±SE) putrescine, spermidine, spermine, and tyramine content (µmol) per gram dry weight (wt) in apical buds, leaf (unexpanded through to leaf 7), stem and root tissue from odc-RNAi transgenic plants vs. VC plants. Significant differences (P<0.05) among plant lines were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test and are indicated by letters (n=4). Unexpanded leaves in non-wounded plants were less than 50% expanded at the time of harvest.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Open in a new tab

Levels of pyridine alkaloids and phenolamides in tissues of non-wounded and wounded vector-only control and odc-RNAi plants. Plants were either left unwounded (C) or had their apex removed (A) and tissues were harvested 7 d post-treatment as described in Fig. 6. Data represent mean (±SE) concentrations (mg) per gram dry weight (wt) of nicotine, anatabine, and nornicotine (pyridine alkaloids) and caffeoylputrescine and dicaffeoylspermidine (phenolamides) in apical buds, leaf (unexpanded through to leaf 7), stem, and root tissue from VC vs. odc-RNAi transgenic plants. Letters represent significantly different (P<0.05) concentrations of metabolites determined by two-way ANOVA and followed by Tukey’s HSD test among odc-RNAi and VC plants (n=4). Unexpanded leaves in non-wounded plants were less than 50% expanded at the time of harvest.

Effects of silencing ODC upon growth and flowering in N. tabacum

In a separate study, Nölke et al. (2005) reported that the use of immuno-modulation to inhibit ODC enzymatic activity in transgenic N. tabacum led to a decrease in levels of all three polyamines. Morphological changes were also observed, including stunted plants with elongated leaves that produced smaller and fewer flowers. In our previous experiments involving T1 offspring of transgenic plants, we did not observe an obvious negative effect upon phenotype in hydroponically grown plants containing the odc-RNAi construct (DeBoer et al., 2011a). However, in the present study, using T2 offspring homozygous for the introduced empty pART27 vector and odc-RNAi constructs, careful observation did reveal a number of negative effects upon leaf morphology, growth and reproductive parameters in hydroponically grown odc-RNAi transgenics compared with VC plants (Fig. 8). These alterations became progressively more obvious with age and, although much less pronounced, were reminiscent of the effects observed by Nölke et al. (2005). Thus, at ~11 weeks old, hydroponically grown odc-RNAi plants had produced on average, one fewer leaf than their equivalently aged, similarly cultivated VC counterparts (Fig. 8A). This was accompanied by reductions in stem length (Fig. 8B), internode length (Fig. 8C), root biomass (Fig. 8D), and rate of axillary bud emergence and outgrowth following decapitation of plants to 10cm in height (Fig. 8E). We also noticed that leaves of hydroponically grown odc-RNAi plants displayed tendencies for sporadic bleaching and occasional chlorosis (Fig. 8F) of entire leaves, which were slightly epinastic and brittle compared with leaves of hydroponically grown VC plants (Fig 8F). Although these alterations in leaf morphology bore some resemblance to classic symptoms of mineral deficiencies, separate growth experiments showed they were not prevented by more frequent replenishment of the Hoagland’s nutrient medium in each container (three times per week) or by separately altering the concentrations of nitrate, iron or manganese over a range from one-quarter strength to double strength that of normal Hoaglands, with twice weekly changes in medium (data not shown). In contrast to hydroponically grown plants, seedlings transplanted to compost, with the aim of generating sufficient seed for further studies, showed odc-RNAi lines to be markedly slower growing and delayed in their time of flowering compared with VC plants (Fig. 8G). We hypothesize that these differences in growth capacity between hydroponically and soil grown sibling odc-RNAi transgenic plants reflects a reduced capacity to recover essential nutrients from the compost mix, likely due to diminished root system functionality compared with VC counterparts. Further analysis is ongoing to examine in detail this aspect of odc-RNAi transgenics vs. VC and wild-type plants of N. tabacum.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Open in a new tab

Growth and morphological traits in vector-only control and odc-RNAi plants. Seedlings cultured on MS medium in vitro for 6 weeks (4–6 leaf stage) were transferred to either hydroponics (A–F) with continual nutrient replenishment or transplanted into compost (G) containing an initial application of Osmocote® controlled release complete fertiliser. Five weeks after plants were transferred to hydroponics, leaf number (A), stem length (B), internode length (C), root biomass blotted to remove extra liquid (D) and leaf morphology (F) were recorded from non-wounded VC and odc-RNAi transgenic plants. (Note the presence of chlorotic sections on leaves of odc-RNAi plants, unlike VC plants as shown in panel E). Plants were then decapitated to a uniform height of 10cm, all remaining leaves were removed, and the average length of the top three axillary buds emerging following decapitation was determined over the following 8 days (E). ​Significant differences (P<0.05) between lines, represented by letters, were calculated by one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test (n=4). VC plants that were transferred to compost at the ~4–6 leaf stage, with the aim of collecting seeds after self-fertilization, were observed to be approximately 60–80cm high after a further 12 weeks cultivation, with evidence of inflorescence formation or flowers beginning to open. In contrast, odc-RNAi plants were much shorter in height (10–25cm) with no signs of inflorescence development at this time point (G; lower senescent leaves removed prior to photography). The odc-RNAi plants shown here did flower, however, after a further 8–12 weeks of greenhouse cultivation, with heights of plants at flowering being approximately half that of the VC controls when they commenced flowering. Overall floral morphology and self-fertility were not noticeably altered in these odc-RNAi transgenics compared with vector-only control plants (data not shown). fr. wt: fresh weight.

Discussion

Although N. tabacum has been used for many years as a model system to study wound-associated alterations in alkaloid biosynthesis and transport from roots to aerial tissues, (for recent reviews see Dewey and Xie, 2013; Wang and Bennetzen 2015), the relationship between ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ metabolism in vivo remains unclear, particularly in wounded plants. In the present study, we examined the broader metabolic consequences of down-regulating ODC transcript levels in N. tabacum, comparing non-wounded and wounded lines homozygous for an odc-RNAi construct with a control line homozygous for VC T-DNA, all derived from the transgenic plants described in the study of DeBoer et al. (2011a). Higher ornithine concentrations in odc-RNAi transgenics, relative to that of VC plants, was not unexpected given their reduced capacity to produce ODC transcript which, as shown previously, results in diminished ODC activity (DeBoer et al., 2011a). As illustrated in Fig. 1, and discussed recently (Majumdar et al., 2013; Winter et al., 2015; Majumdar et al., 2016), there is a close relationship between ornithine metabolism, catabolism of glutamate and the synthesis of arginine in plants. It is possible therefore that such elevated concentrations of ornithine in odc-RNAi transgenics may have led directly to increased rates of arginine synthesis as well as a build-up of glutamate in tissues that, in turn, led to higher concentrations of glutamine. It is possible too that increased concentrations of aspartate in odc-RNAi transgenics, relative to VC plants, is directly linked to the diminished levels of QPT transcript in these plants, discussed in more detail below. Further work is thus warranted to examine both gene transcript levels and enzyme activities of the proteins responsible for conversion of glutamate–glutamine and glutamate–ornithine–arginine (Page et al., 2012) and also aspartate–quinolinic acid and additional key enzymes associated with NAD synthesis (Katoh et al., 2006; Noctor et al., 2006).

Co-ordinated up-regulation of many genes encoding enzymes involved in alkaloid production, some also with important roles in primary metabolism such as ODC and QPT (Sinclair et al., 2000; DeBoer et al., 2011a; Ryan et al., 2012), has been reported in several Nicotiana species (e.g. Goossens et al., 2003: Sinclair et al., 2004; Cane et al., 2005; Shoji et al., 2008) and involves concerted action of multiple JAZ-, MYC2-, and AP2/ERF-type regulatory proteins (Shoji et al., 2008; Shoji et al., 2010; DeBoer et al., 2011b; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2011; Zhang et al., 2012; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2012; Sears et al., 2014; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2013b; Shoji and Hashimoto, 2015; Yang et al., 2015). In previous experiments in which PMT and ADC genes were strongly down-regulated in N. tabacum hairy roots using an antisense approach, transcript levels of non-targeted alkaloid biosynthesis genes were generally similar in antisense lines compared with vector controls (Chintapakorn and Hamill, 2003; Chintapakorn and Hamill, 2007). Thus, our observations in the current work that PMT and MATE transcripts were significantly higher in roots of wounded odc-RNAi plants compared with similarly treated VC plants, whilst A622 and QPT transcripts were significantly lower, were not anticipated. These observations may indicate the existence of one or more hitherto undefined additional regulatory control mechanism(s) controlling the synthesis of defensive alkaloids in N. tabacum, particularly in response to wounding. One or more mechanism(s) linking ornithine metabolism directly with pyridine alkaloid biosynthetic capacity in Nicotiana may also help explain previous observations whereby over-expression of a yeast ODC gene led to both elevated putrescine levels and increased concentrations of nicotine in hairy roots of N. rustica (Hamill et al., 1990). Conversely, reduced transcript levels of QPT, A622 and possibly other genes encoding key enzymes required for production and incorporation of the pyridine ring of anabasine may have contributed to the reduced ability of odc-RNAi transgenic plants of N. glauca to produce this alkaloid, compared with vector controls, in response to the removal of plant apices (DeBoer et al., 2013). The biochemical nature of such regulatory mechanism(s) that may link primary and alkaloid specialized metabolism in Nicotiana remains speculative at the current time but it may be pertinent to note that in addition to being an important intermediate for various catabolic reactions, ornithine has been proposed to be an important signalling molecule that plays a key role in controlling synthesis of associated amino acids and polyamines (Majumdar et al., 2013; Majumdar et al., 2016). Also of relevance here may be the recent discovery of an miRNA decoy that accumulates in roots of N. tabacum in response to apex removal, leading to sequestration of an miRNA that targets QPT, thereby enabling increased levels of QPT transcript levels in roots of wounded plants (Li et al., 2015). The use of RNAi and other approaches to alter gene expression will be valuable in exploring further the links between ornithine and alkaloid metabolism in a range of Nicotiana species and possibly also other plants that produce specialized metabolites derived from nicotinic acid (reviewed in Ashihara et al., 2015)

Deployment of chemical defences is often allocated with a higher preference for reproductively significant tissues or younger tissues that are potentially more vulnerable to attack by herbivores (Baldwin et al., 1990). Accordingly, in the current study the largest differences between alkaloid levels of wounded VC- and odc-RNAi transgenic plants were observed in leaves positioned in the upper half of plants. Markedly reduced concentrations of phenolamides were also found in the upper leaves of odc-RNAi plants compared with phyllotactic equivalent tissues of VC plants. These putrescine derivatives have recently been shown to be important defence agents against insect herbivores (Gaquerel et al., 2010; Kaur et al., 2010; Onkokesung et al., 2012). Tyramine is also stimulated by wounding in Nicotiana (Guillet and De Luca, 2005; Kim et al., 2011). Though not directly associated with putrescine or polyamine metabolism, it is noteworthy that odc-RNAi transgenics were also significantly less capable of increasing tyramine levels of leaves and roots following apex removal. At the present time we can only speculate as to the capacity of odc-RNAi transgenic N. tabacum plants to resist herbivory in an external environment. However, it is likely that they would be much more susceptible to insect attack than normal, as was reported previously for transgenic plants of N. attenuata in which overall levels of pyridine alkaloids were reduced as a result of down-regulation of the PMT gene (Steppuhn et al., 2004).

With regards to effects of ODC gene manipulation upon polyamine metabolism, previous experiments have demonstrated a several-fold increase in putrescine content, but little change in overall levels of spermidine and spermine, in transgenic Nicotiana tissues engineered to over-express ODC from a variety of organisms including yeast (Hamill et al., 1990), mouse (DeScenzo and Minocha, 1993) and the closely related solanaceous species Datura stramonium (Mayer and Michael, 2003). Experiments with cultured poplar cells also engineered to over-express mouse ODC reported similar results, with analysis of plant ODC, ADC, SPDS, and SAMDC transcript levels indicating that only the latter was significantly altered (reduced) in cells over-expressing the mouse ODC gene compared with vector controls (Page et al., 2007). In the current study employing a contrasting approach in which native ODC was down-regulated in tobacco using an RNAi approach, diminished transcript levels of the polyamine synthesis genes SAMDC, SAMS, and SPDS in roots of odc-RNAi plants was observed compared with vector-only controls. Such reductions in transcript abundance in odc-RNAi transgenics may be directly linked with reduced putrescine supply and likely underpin the lower spermidine and spermine levels that we observed in these plants compared with their VC counterparts. On the other hand, an increase in the arginine concentration of these plants, together with elevated ADC transcript, is in line with previous observations suggesting compensatory increases in ADC activity in plants with lowered ODC activity (Nölke et al., 2005; DeBoer et al., 2011a). This may have facilitated maintenance of adequate baseline concentrations of putrescine and higher polyamines for essential primary and also specialized metabolism requirements and is consistent with suggestions that putrescine supply in plants is influenced biochemically by the metabolic flux of associated metabolites (Page et al., 2012; Majumdar et al., 2016).

In addition to changes in the metabolic profile of ODC-silenced plants, and unlike our earlier observations with plants of the T1 generation (DeBoer et al., 2011a), we observed some negative effects upon plant growth and morphology in hydroponically grown T2 lines that were homozygous for the introduced odc-RNAi construct, compared with VC controls. Anomalies such as sporadic periodic production of chlorotic, bleached and brittle leaves may be linked to changes in photosynthetic machinery or nutritional deficiencies associated with reduced putrescine supply (Sfichi et al., 2004; Ioannidis et al., 2012). Other differences in these hydroponically grown odc-RNAi transgenics compared with vector-only controls, such as shorter internodes, reduced root biomass, slower rates of release of dormant axillary buds following decapitation, and also markedly reduced vigour and delayed onset of flowering in odc-RNAi plants when grown in soil, are broadly in line with morphological alterations that have been reported previously in polyamine mutants of tobacco (Malmberg and McIndoo, 1983); in Nicotiana plants treated with the ODC biochemical inhibitor difluoromethylornithine (DFMO; Burtin et al., 1991); and in transgenics with immuno-modulated ODC (Nölke et al., 2005). Such abnormalities may be indicative of spermine depletion rather than attenuation of putrescine or spermidine levels per se (Hanzawa et al., 2000; Imai et al., 2004; Nölke et al., 2005). It will be of interest to determine whether introduction of a more distantly related ODC gene less likely to be down-regulated by the Nicotiana odc-RNAi construct used here, for example the ODC gene from yeast that was previously expressed in N. rustica (Hamill et al., 1990), will lead to restoration of normal polyamine metabolism and patterns of growth in odc-RNAi transgenic lines of N. tabacum.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Table S1. Sequences of gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR

Supplementary Data
supp_67_11_3367__index.html (995B, html)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Emmanuel Gaquerel for practical assistance and discussions and to Profs Ian Baldwin and Jonathan Gershenzon and Drs Michael Reichelt and Mario Kallenbach of the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, Germany for advice and use of chemical analysis facilities. We thank A/Prof Beth McGraw of Monash University for experimental guidance regarding RTqPCR and use of laboratory equipment. We also thank two anonymous referees for constructive criticisms which assisted in the preparation of a revised final manuscript. This work was undertaken with funding from Australian Research Council grant A19701779 to J.D.H. with additional support from both Monash and Deakin Universities. H.L.D. received a Postgraduate Research Scholarship from Monash University and an R. N. Robertson Travelling Fellowship from the Australian Society of Plant Scientists. The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

A622

PIP-family oxidoreductase

ADC

arginine decarboxylase

JA

jasmonate

MATE

multi-drug and toxic compound extrusion

ODC

ornithine decarboxylase

PMT

putrescine methyltransferase

QPT

quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase

RNAi

RNA interference

SAMDC

S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase

SAMS

S-adenosyl methionine synthase

SPDS

spermidine synthase

VC

vector-only control.

References

  1. Ashihara H, Ludw IA, Katahira R, Yokota T, Fujimura T, Crozier A. 2015. Trigonelline and related nicotinic acid metabolites: occurrence, biosynthesis, taxonomic considerations, and their roles in planta and in human health. Phytochemical Reviews 14, 765–798. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aniszewshi T. 2015. Alkaloids: Chemistry, Biology, Ecology and Applications, 2nd edn . Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin IT. 1989. Mechanism of damage induced alkaloid production in wild tobacco. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 1661–1680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldwin IT, Ohnmeiss T. 1993. Alkaloidal responses to damage in Nicotiana native to North America. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 1143–1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldwin IT, Ohnmeiss TE. 1994. Coordination of photosynthetic and alkaloidal responses to damage in uninducible and inducible Nicotiana sylvestris . Ecology 75, 1003–1014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baldwin IT, Schmelz E, Ohnmeiss T. 1994. Wound-induced changes in root and shoot jasmonic acid pools correlate with induced nicotine synthesis in Nicotiana sylvestris Spegazzini and Comes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 2139–2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldwin IT, Schmelz E, Zhang Z-P. 1996. Effects of ocadecanoid metabolites and inhibitors on induced nicotine accumulation in N. sylvestris . Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 61–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baldwin IT, Sims CL, Kean SE. 1990. The reproductive consequences associated with inducible alkaloidal responses in wild tobacco. Ecology 71, 252–262. [Google Scholar]
  9. Burtin D, Martin-Tanguy J, Tepfer D. 1991. α-DL-Difluoromethylornithine, a specific irreversible inhibitor of putrescine biosynthesis, induces a phenotype in tobacco similar to that ascribed to the root-inducing, left-hand transferred DNA of Agrobacterium rhizogenes . Plant Physiology 95, 461–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bush L, Hempfling WP, Burton H. 1999. Biosynthesis of nicotine and related compounds. In: Gorrod JW, Jacob III P, eds. Analytical determination of nicotine and related compounds and their metabolites. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 13–44. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cane K, Mayer M, Lidgett A, Michael A, Hamill JD. 2005. Molecular analysis of alkaloid metabolism in AABB v. aabb genotype Nicotiana tabacum in response to wounding of aerial tissues and methyl jasmonate treatment of cultured roots. Functional Plant Biology 32, 305–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaplin JF. 1966. SC58 Tobacco. Crop Science 6, 97. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chintapakorn Y, Hamill JD. 2003. Antisense-mediated down-regulation of putrescine N-methyltransferase activity in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. can lead to elevated levels of anatabine at the expense of nicotine. Plant Molecular Biology 53, 87–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chintapakorn Y, Hamill JD. 2007. Antisense-mediated reduction in ADC activity causes minor alterations in the alkaloid profile of cultured hairy root and regenerated transgenic plants of Nicotiana tabacum . Phytochemistry 68, 2465–2479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DeBoer KD, Dalton HL, Edward FJ, Hamill JD. 2011. a. RNAi-mediated down-regulation of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) leads to reduced nicotine and increased anatabine levels in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum. L . Phytochemistry 72, 344–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DeBoer KD, Dalton HL, Edward FJ, Ryan SM, Hamill JD. 2013. RNAi-mediated down-regulation of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) impedes wound-stress stimulation of anabasine synthesis in Nicotiana glauca . Phytochemistry 86, 21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. DeBoer K, Lye J, Aitken C, Su A, Hamill JD. 2009. The A622 gene in Nicotiana glauca (tree tobacco): evidence for a functional role in pyridine alkaloid synthesis. Plant Molecular Biology 69, 299–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. DeBoer K, Tilleman S, Pauwels L, Vanden Bossche R, De Sutter V, Vanderhaeghen R, Hilson P, Hamill JD, Goossens A. 2011. b. APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR and basic helix-loop-helix tobacco transcription factors cooperatively mediate jasmonate-elicited nicotine biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 66, 1053–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. DeScenzo RA, Minocha SC. 1993. Modulation of cellular polyamines in tobacco by transfer and expression of mouse ornithine decarboxylase cDNA. Plant Molecular Biology 22, 113–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dewey RE, Xie J. 2013. Molecular genetics of alkaloid biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum . Phytochemistry 94, 10–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fariduddin Q, Varshney P, Yusuf M, Ahmad A. 2013. Polyamines: potent modulators of plant responses to stress. Journal of Plant Interactions 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fellenberg C, Ziegler J, Handrick V, Vogt T. 2012. Polyamine homeostasis in wild type and phenolamide deficient Arabidopsis thaliana stamens. Frontiers in Plant Science 3, 180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaquerel E, Heiling S, Schoettner M, Zurek G, Baldwin IT. 2010. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry method for induced changes in Nicotiana attenuata leaves during simulated herbivory. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58, 9418–9427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goossens A, Häkkinen ST, Laakso I, et al. 2003. A functional genomics approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100, 8595–8600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guillet G, De Luca V. 2005. Wound-inducible biosynthesis of phytoalexin hydroxycinnamic acid amides of tyramine in tryptophan and tyrosine decarboxylase transgenic tobacco lines. Plant Physiology 137, 692–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hamill JD, Parr AJ, Robins RJ, Rhodes MJC. 1986. Secondary product formation by cultures of Beta vulgaris and Nicotiana rustica transformed with Agrobacterium rhizogenes . Plant Cell Reports 5, 111–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamill JD, Robins RJ, Parr AJ, Evans DM, Furze JM, Rhodes MJC. 1990. Over-expressing a yeast ornithine decarboxylase gene in transgenic roots of Nicotiana rustica can lead to enhanced nicotine accumulation. Plant Molecular Biology 15, 27–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hanzawa Y, Takahashi T, Michael AJ, Burtin D, Long D, Pineiro M, Coupland G, Komeda Y. 2000. ACAULIS5, an Arabidopsis gene required for stem elongation, encodes a spermine synthase. The EMBO Journal 19, 4248–4256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. He YB, Zhao Y. 2015. A key link between jasmonic acid signaling and auxin biosynthesis. Science China Life Sciences 58, 311–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hentrich M, Böttcher C, Düchting P, Cheng Y, Zhao Y, Berkowitz O, Masle J, Medina J, Pollmann S. 2013. The jasmonic acid signaling pathway is linked to auxin homeostasis through the modulation of YUCCA8 and YUCCA9 gene expression. The Plant Journal 74, 626–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hildreth SB, Gehman EA, Yang H, et al. 2011. Tobacco nicotine uptake permease (NUP1) affects alkaloid metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108, 18179–18184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Imai A, Akiyamab T, Katoc T, Satoc S, Tabatac S, Yamamotoa KT, Takahashia T. 2004. Spermine is not essential for survival of Arabidopsis . FEBS Letters 556, 148–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ioannidis NE, Cruz JA, Kotzabasis K, Kramer DM. 2012. Evidence that putrescine modulates the higher plant photosynthetic proton circuit. PLoS ONE 7, e29864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jander G, Norris SR, Joshi V, Fraga M, Rugg A, Yu S, Li L, Last RL. 2004. Application of a high-throughput HPLC–MS/MS assay to Arabidopsis mutant screening: evidence that threonine aldolase plays a role in seed nutritional quality. The Plant Journal 39, 465–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kato K, Shoji T, Hashimoto T. 2014. Tobacco nicotine uptake permease regulates the expression of a key transcription factor gene in the nicotine biosynthesis pathway. Plant Physiology 166, 2195–2204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Katoh A, Uenohara K, Akita M, Hashimoto T. 2006. Early steps in the biosynthesis of NAD in Arabidopsis start with aspartate and occur in the plastid. Plant Physiology 141, 851–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaur H, Heinzel N, Schöttner M, Baldwin IT, Gális I. 2010. R2R3-NaMYB8 regulates the accumulation of phenylpropanoid-polyamine conjugates, which are essential for local and systemic defense against insect herbivores in Nicotiana attenuata . Plant Physiology 152, 1731–1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim SG, Yon F, Gaquerel E, Gulati J, Baldwin IT. 2011. Tissue specific diurnal rhythms of metabolites and their regulation during herbivore attack in a native tobacco, Nicotiana attenuata . PLoS ONE 6, e26214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Knapp S, Chase M, Clarkson J. 2004. Nomenclatural changes and a new sectional classification in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Taxon 53, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kusano T, Suzuki H. 2015. Polyamines: A universal molecular nexus for growth, survival, and specialized metabolism . Tokyo: Springer Japan. [Google Scholar]
  41. Labandeira CC. 1998. Early history of arthropod and vascular plant associations. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 26, 329–377. [Google Scholar]
  42. Leete E. 1992. Biosynthesis and metabolism of secondary metabolite natural products. In: Petroski RJ, McCormick SP, eds. Secondary-metabolite biosynthesis and metabolism . New York: Plenum Press, 121–140. [Google Scholar]
  43. Leete E, Slattery SA. 1976. Incorporation of [2-14C]- and [6-14C]nicotinic acid into the tobacco alkaloids. Biosynthesis of anatabine and α-β-dipyridyl. Journal of the American Chemical Society 98, 6326–6330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lewis RS, Bowen SW, Keogh MR, Dewey RE. 2010. Three nicotine demethylase genes mediate nornicotine biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum L.: functional characterization of the CYP82E10 gene. Phytochemistry 71, 1988–1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lewis RS, Jack AM, Morris JW, Robert VJM, Gavilano L, Siminszky B, Bush LP, Hayes AJ, Dewey RE. 2008. RNAi-induced suppression of nicotine demethylase activity reduces levels of a key carcinogen in cured tobacco leaves. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 346–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li F, Wang W, Zhao N, et al. 2015. Regulation of nicotine biosynthesis by an endogenous target mimicry of microRNA in tobacco. Plant Physiology 169, 1062–1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Majumdar R, Barchi B, Turlapati SA, Gagne M, Minocha R, Long S, Minocha SC. 2016. Glutamate, ornithine, arginine, proline, and polyamine metabolic interactions: The pathway is regulated at the post-transcriptional level. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Majumdar R, Shao L, Minocha R, Long S, Minocha SC. 2013. Ornithine: The overlooked molecule in the regulation of polyamine metabolism. Plant and Cell Physiology 54, 990–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Malmberg RL, McIndoo J. 1983. Abnormal floral development of a tobacco mutant with elevated polyamine levels. Nature 305, 623–625. [Google Scholar]
  51. Martin-Tanguy J. 1985. The occurrence and possible function of hydroxycinnamoyl acid-amides in plants. Plant Growth Regulation 3, 381 – 399. [Google Scholar]
  52. Michael AJ. 2015. Biosynthesis of polyamines in eukaryotes, archaea, and bacteria. In: Kusano T, Suzuki H, eds. Polyamines: A universal molecular nexus for growth, survival, and specialized metabolism. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mayer MJ, Michael AJ. 2003. Polyamine homeostasis in transgenic plants overexpressing ornithine decarboxylase includes ornithine limitation. Journal of Biochemistry 134, 765–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Morita M, Shitan N, Sawada K, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Rischer H, Goossens A, Oksman-caldentey K, Moriyama Y, Yazaki K. 2009. Vacuolar transport of nicotine is mediated by a multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) transporter in Nicotiana tabacum . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 2447–2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Noctor G, Queval G, Gakie B. 2006. NAD(P) synthesis and pyridine nucleotide cycling in plants and their potential importance in stress conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1603–1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Nölke G, Schneider B, Fischer R, Schillberg S. 2005. Immunomodulation of polyamine biosynthesis in tobacco plants has a significant impact on polyamine levels and generates a dwarf phenotype. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3, 237–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ohnmeiss TE, Baldwin IT. 1994. The allometry of nitrogen allocation to growth and an inducible defense under nitrogen-limited growth. Ecology 75, 995–1002. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ohnmeiss TE, Baldwin IT. 2000. Optimal defense theory predicts the ontogeny of an induced nicotine defense. Ecology 81, 1765–1783. [Google Scholar]
  59. Onkokesung N, Gaquerel E, Kotkar H, Kaur H, Baldwin IT, Gális I. 2012. MYB8 controls inducible phenolamide levels by activating three novel hydroxycinnamoyl-coenzymeA:polyamine transferases in Nicotiana attenuata . Plant Physiology 158, 389–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Page AF, Minocha R, Minocha SC. 2012. Living with high putrescine: expression of ornithine and arginine biosynthetic pathway genes in high and low putrescine producing poplar cells. Amino Acids 42, 295–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Page AF, Mohapatra S, Minocha R, Minocha SC. 2007. The effects of genetic manipulation on transcription and activities of the other polyamine biosynthetic enzymes. Physiologia Plantarum 129, 707–724. [Google Scholar]
  62. Parr AJ, Hamill JD. 1987. Relationships between the biosynthetic capacities of Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed hairy roots and intact, uninfected plants of Nicotiana species. Phytochemistry 26, 3241–3245. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pauwels L, Barbero GF, Geerinck J, et al. 2010. NINJA connects the co-repressor TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling. Nature 464, 788–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ryan SM, Cane KA, De Boer KD, Sinclair SJ, Brimblecombe R, Hamill JD. 2012. Structure and expression of the quinolinate phosphoribosyltrasnferase (QPT) gene family in Nicotiana . Plant Science 188–189, 102–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Saitoh F, Noma M, Kawashima N. 1985. The alkaloid contents of sixty Nicotiana species. Phytochemistry 24, 477–480. [Google Scholar]
  66. Saunders JW, Bush LP. 1979. Nicotine biosynthetic enzyme activities in Nicotiana tabacum L. genotypes with different alkaloid levels. Plant Physiology 64, 236–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Schmidt GW, Delaney SK. 2010. Stable internal reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) during development and abiotic stress. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 283, 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sears MT, Zhang H, Rushton PJ, Wu M, Han S, Spano AJ, Timko MP. 2014. NtERF32: a non-Nic2 locus AP2/ERF transcription factor required in jasmonate-inducible nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Molecular Biology 84, 49–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sfichi L, Ioannidis N, Kotzabasis K. 2004. Thylakoid-associated polyamines adjust the UV-B sensitivity of the photosynthetic apparatus by means of light-harvesting complex II changes. Photochemistry and Photobiology 80, 499–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Shi Q, Li C, Zhang F. 2006. Nicotine synthesis in Nicotiana tabacum L. induced by mechanical wounding is regulated by auxin. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 2899–2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Shitan N, Kato K, Shoji T. 2014. a. Alkaloid transporters in plants. Plant Biotechnology 31, 453–463. [Google Scholar]
  72. Shitan N, Minami S, Morita M, et al. 2014. b. Involvement of the leaf-specific multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) transporter Nt-JAT2 in vacuolar sequestration of nicotine in Nicotiana tabacum . PLoS ONE 9, e108789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Shitan N, Morita M, Yazaki K. 2009. Identification of a nicotine transporter in leaf vacuoles of Nicotiana tabacum . Plant Signaling and Behavior 4, 530–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Shoji T, Hashimoto T. 2011. Recruitment of a duplicated primary metabolism gene into the nicotine biosynthesis regulon in tobacco. The Plant Journal 67, 949–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Shoji T, Hashimoto T. 2012. DNA-binding and transcriptional activation properties of tobacco NIC2-locus ERF189 and related transcription factors. Plant Biotechnology Journal 29, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  76. Shoji T, Hashimoto T. 2013. a. Biosynthesis and regulation of tobacco alkaloids. In: Wallner F, ed. Herbaceous plants . New York: Nova Science Publishers, 37–60. [Google Scholar]
  77. Shoji T, Hashimoto T. 2013. b. Smoking out the masters: transcriptional regulators for nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Biotechnology Journal 30, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  78. Shoji T, Hashimoto T. 2015. Stress-induced expression of NICOTINE2-locus genes and their homologs encoding Ethylene Response Factor transcription factors in tobacco. Phytochemistry 113, 41–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shoji T, Inai K, Yazaki Y, et al. 2009. Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion-type transporters implicated in vacuolar sequestration of nicotine in tobacco roots. Plant Physiology 149, 708–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shoji T, Kajikawa M, Hashimoto T. 2010. Clustered transcription factor genes regulate nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco. The Plant Cell 22, 3390–3409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shoji T, Ogawa T, Hashimoto T. 2008. Jasmonate-induced nicotine formation in tobacco is mediated by tobacco COI1 and JAZ genes. Plant and Cell Physiology 49, 1003–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Siminszky B, Gavilano L, Bowen S, Dewey R. 2005. Conversion of nicotine to nornicotine in Nicotiana tabacum is mediated by CYP82E4, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 14919–14924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sinclair SJ, Johnson R, Hamill JD. 2004. Analysis of wound-induced gene expression in Nicotiana species with contrasting alkaloid profiles. Functional Plant Biology 31, 721–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sinclair SJ, Murphy K, Birch C, Hamill JD. 2000. Molecular characterization of quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase (QPRTase) in Nicotiana . Plant Molecular Biology 44, 603–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Smith TA, Negrel J, Bird CR. 1983. The cinnamic acid amides of the di- and polyamines. In: Bachrach U, Kaye A, Chayen R, eds. Advances in Polyamine Research. New York: Raven Press, 347–370. [Google Scholar]
  86. Steppuhn A, Gase K, Krock B, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. 2004. Nicotine’s defensive function in nature. PLoS Biology 2, 1074–1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Verwoerd TC, Dekker BMM, Hoekema A. 1989. A small-scale procedure for the rapid isolation of plant RNAs. Nucleic Acids Research 17, 2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang X, Bennetzen JL. 2015. Current status and prospects for the study of Nicotiana genomics, genetics, and nicotine biosynthesis genes. Molecular and General Genomics 290, 11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wellman CH, Gray J. 2000. The microfossil record of early land plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 355, 717–732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Winter T, Todd CD, Trovato M, Forlani G, Funck D. 2015. Physiological implications of arginine metabolism in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Yang Y, Guo J, Yan P, et al. 2015. Transcriptome profiling identified multiple jasmonate ZIM-domain proteins involved in the regulation of alkaloid biosynthesis in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 33, 153–166. [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhang H, Bokowiec MT, Rushton PJ, Han S, Timko MP. 2012. Tobacco transcription factors NtMYC2a and NtMYC2b form nuclear complexes with the NtJAZ1 repressor and regulate multiple jasmonate-inducible steps in nicotine biosynthesis. Molecular Plant 5, 73–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data
supp_67_11_3367__index.html (995B, html)
supp_erw166_Supplemental_Table_S1.pdf (213.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES