Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Cerebellum. 2011 Mar;10(1):96–103. doi: 10.1007/s12311-010-0235-0

The Neuropathology of Late-Onset Friedreich’s Ataxia

Arnulf H Koeppen 1,, Jennifer A Morral 2, Rodney D McComb 3, Paul J Feustel 4
PMCID: PMC4894659  NIHMSID: NIHMS789990  PMID: 21128039

Abstract

Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA) affects very young persons. In a large series, the mean ages of onset and death were 11 and 38 years, respectively. The clinical spectrum of FRDA has expanded after genetic confirmation of the mutation became a routine laboratory test. The main cause of death in juvenile-onset FRDA is cardiomyopathy whereas patients with late-onset are more likely to succumb to neurological disability or an intercurrent illness. Many patients with early onset now survive for 20 years or longer. This study made a systematic comparison of the neuropathology in 14 patients with juvenile onset and long survival, and five patients with late onset and long survival. Mean ages of onset (± standard deviation) were 10±5 and 28± 13 years, respectively. Disease durations were 33±11 and 47±11 years, respectively. Cross-sectional areas of the thoracic spinal cord were greatly reduced from the normal state but did not differ between the two groups. Similarly, the neurons of dorsal root ganglia were significantly reduced in size in both juvenile- and late-onset cases of FRDA. The dentate nucleus showed severe loss of neurons as well as modification and destruction of corticonuclear terminals in all FRDA patients. Delayed atrophy of the dentate nucleus is the likely cause of the ataxic phenotype of FRDA in late-onset cases, but the reason for the delay is unknown. Frataxin levels in the dentate nucleus of two patients with late onset were similar to those of seven patients with juvenile onset.

Keywords: Age of onset, Dentate nucleus, Dorsal root ganglion, Frataxin, Friedreich’s ataxia, Spinal cord

Introduction

Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive disease that affects central and peripheral nervous systems; heart; skeleton; and endocrine pancreas. In her large series of patients, Harding [1] reported a mean age of onset of 10.52 years and a mean age of death of 37.54 years. De Michele et al. [2] defined “late onset” as 24.4 years (range 21–29 years) but the identification of the mutation as a homozygous guanine-adenine-adenine (GAA) trinucleotide repeat expansion in intron one of the frataxin gene [3] dramatically broadened the spectrum of the disease including age of onset [4]. First signs of ataxia at the age of 40 years or above are no longer unusual [4], and some patients are not diagnosed during life [5]. Short GAA expansions convey a more benign phenotype including late onset [4] and protracted course [5]. Generally, patients with very late-onset FRDA have no cardiomyopathy or diabetes mellitus but die from disabling ataxia or illnesses that are unrelated to FRDA. Many patients with juvenile-onset of FRDA now also survive for decades despite cardiomyopathy. Heart disease in FRDA evolves independently of the neurological manifestations of FRDA and may precede ataxia [6]. In rare cases, rapidly progressive cardiomyopathy leads to early death before the neurological phenotype becomes evident. Such cases offer insight into the progression of FRDA in the nervous system. Little is known about the neuropathological differences between late-onset and juvenile-onset long-surviving FRDA patients. This report presents a comparison of the main nervous system lesions in these two groups. Dentate nucleus (DN) and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) bear the brunt of the disease [7, 8] though classical teaching emphasizes atrophy of the spinal cord and dorsal spinal roots [9]. The observations point toward progressive disease of the DN as the main reason for neurological disability in patients with late-onset FRDA.

Patients and Methods

The Institutional Review Board of the VA Medical Center, Albany, N.Y., USA, has approved the human-subjects research underlying this report. Patients with FRDA of “juvenile-onset with long survival” (JOFLS) were defined as having the onset of their disease at an age of 20 years or less and a survival of 20 years or more. “Late-onset” FRDA with long survival (LOFLS) was defined as onset after the age of 20 years and survival of 20 years or more. Table 1 lists details of sex, age of onset, age of death, disease duration, GAA trinucleotide repeat expansions, and causes of death. Specimens from 14 patients with JOFLS and five patients with LOFLS were available. All cases included the DN. Adequate tissue samples of mid-thoracic spinal cord were available from 12 patients with JOFLS; four patients with LOFLS; and six normal controls. DRG were available from 11 of 14 JOFLS patients, three of five LOFLS patients, three controls for JOFLS (age range, 36–54 years) and seven controls for LOFLS (age range, 65–71 years).

Table 1.

Autopsy specimens of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia grouped according to age of onset and disease duration

No. and sex Age of onset (years) Age of death (years) Disease duration (years) GAA trinucleotide repeats Cause of death
JOFLSa
 1F 2 33 31 604/455 Cardiomyopathy; renal failure
 2F 7 38 31 750/594 Cardiomyopathy; embolic stroke
 3M 16 39 23 491/370 Cardiomyopathy
 4F 8 28 20 709/559 Cardiomyopathy; embolic stroke
 5F 17 58 41 566/566 Cardiomyopathy; brain hemorrhage
 6M 10 38 28 934/429 Cardiomyopathy
 7F 11 42 31 990/761 Cardiomyopathy
 8F 7 55 48 793/644 Cachexia
 9F 6 36 30 840/715 Cardiomyopathy
 10F 17 77 60 841/466 Cachexia; cardiomyopathy
 11M 3 23 20 1200/1200 Cardiomyopathy
 12M 14 50 36 750/400 Cardiomyopathy; myocardial infarction
 13M 7 34 27 1114/1114 Cardiomyopathy
 14F 17 50 34 723/495 Cardiomyopathy
 Mean±SDb 10±5 43±14 33±11 808±201/626±253
LOFLSa
 15F 22 65 43 631/242 Cachexia
 16F 21 79 58 549/356 Cachexia; stroke
 17F 20 61 41 694/593 Cardiomyopathy
 18F 50 83 33 236/106 Cachexia
 19M 29 87 58 170/120 Bronchopneumonia; stroke
 Mean±SDb 28±13 75±11 47±11 456±238c/283±201c
a

JOFLS, juvenile-onset FRDA with long survival; LOFLS, late-onset FRDA with long survival

b

SD, standard deviation. FRDA patients 15F and 16F were sisters. In LOFLS patients 18F and 19M, the diagnosis of FRDA was not established during life

c

GAA repeats are significantly longer in JOFLS than LOFLS for both the long (t-test; p=0.005) and the short alleles (t-test; p=0.014)

In one patient with FRDA, onset was at 15 years but severe cardiomyopathy led to his death 4 years later. Spinal cord and DN of this case were available for comparison with JOFLS and LOFLS.

Immunocytochemistry of DN and Spinal Cord

Six-μm-thick sections of the cerebellar hemisphere were stained by immunocytochemistry with mouse monoclonal antibodies to neuron-specific enolase (NSE; Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD; MBL International, Woburn, MA USA). Sections of spinal cord were stained for myelin basic protein (MBP) with a monoclonal antibody from Covance (San Diego, CA, USA). The antibodies were diluted to 2 μg protein/ml (NSE) or 1 μg protein/ml (GAD; MBP). Sections were dewaxed by standard techniques, and endogenous peroxidase activity was suppressed by immersion in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol (30 min). Antigen retrieval for NSE and GAD consisted of a 30-min-long incubation at 95°C in a diluted proprietary “decloaking” solution named DIVA by the supplier (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA). Immunoreactivity of MBP was enhanced by an overnight exposure of the sections to 80% ethanol at 4°C. The sequence of incubations was similar to a previously described procedure [7] and is summarized here as follows (washing steps omitted): primary antibody→biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; 0.6 μg protein/ml)→horseradish peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (Sigma)→diaminobenzidine/hydrogen peroxide. Pale reaction product was enhanced by brief exposure to a 1% solution of osmium tetroxide. Sections were dehydrated and covered by standard methods.

Measurements of Thoracic Spinal Cord Cross-Sectional Area

Paraffin sections of 6 μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Cresyl Violet and photographed at a magnification of 1.25X. A single photograph generally sufficed for FRDA whereas multiple exposures were needed for sections of normal controls. Photos of the control specimens were pieced together to obtain a cohesive cross-sectional area. Final enlargement was 40X. The total cross-sectional area in mm2 was obtained by tracing the outline of the spinal cord on a Zeiss MOP-3 particle analyzer.

Quantitative Determinations of Neuronal Sizes in DRG

All DRG came from lumbar or sacral roots. Six-μm-thick sections were stained by hematoxylin and eosin, or Cresyl Violet. Ten separate neurons of each ganglion with distinct nucleoli were photographed at a magnification of 63X under oil immersion and stored as digital images. After printing, final enlargement was 1,950X. The neuronal cell body was outlined by a pencil mark and traced with the cross-hair device of the Zeiss MOP-3 particle analyzer. Results were expressed as μm2. A common artifact in DRG obtained by autopsy was separation of the neuron from its capsule of satellite cells. In sections with this phenomenon, the pencil mark was placed just inside the row of satellite cells. This method differs from the practice of Ohta et al. [10] who placed the measuring limit to a point midway between the retracted neuron and its satellite cells.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay of Frataxin in the Dentate Nucleus

Frozen samples of DN were available from 7 FRDA patients in the JOFLS group, two patients in the LOFLS group, and controls (aged 49 years and 52 years, respectively). Tissue samples weighing 50–100 mg were obtained by a 4-mm wide cork borer, weighed, and immediately homogenized in two volumes of an ice-cold extraction buffer by three bursts of ultrasonication (5 s). The buffer contained 50 mM tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol (Triton X-100), 1% nonylphenylpolyethyleneglycol (Nonidet P-40), 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 5 mM ethyleneglycol bis(β-aminoethylether) tetraacetic acid (EGTA), and 10% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) [11]. After incubation on ice for 1 h, the homogenate was centrifuged for 2 h at 14,000 × g. The supernatant was collected, and a 50 μl-aliquot was diluted 1:10 with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) to reduce the concentrations of EDTA and EGTA to below 0.1%. The diluted extracts were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 45 min through centrifugal filter devices with a molecular weight cut-off of 30 kDa (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The filtrate was used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The method was similar to double-sandwich ELISA of ferritin that was previously used in this laboratory for DN ferritin [7]. The plates were coated with monoclonal anti-frataxin (0.1 μg protein/ml; Mitosciences, Eugene, OR, USA). The second antibody was rabbit polyclonal anti-frataxin that was generously supplied by Drs. Grazia Isaya and Oleksandr Gakh (Rochester, MN, USA). The same investigators also provided human recombinant frataxin that was used to standardize ELISA. Aliquots of tissue extract corresponding to 2, 5, and 6.67 mg original wet tissue yielded colored reaction product that absorbed light at 492 nm in the range of 75 pg to 4 ng human recombinant frataxin. Optimal curve fitting of standards was based on absorbances at 492 nm vs. the logarithm of the amounts of frataxin.

Statistical Analysis

Thoracic spinal cord areas of JOFLS and LOFLS were compared to each other and normal controls by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with significance accepted at p<0.05. The comparison of neuronal size in DRG was based on repeated-measures ANOVA with a fixed effect of group (JOFLS, JOFLS controls, LOFLS, LOFLS controls) and a random repeat measure of the neuronal size nested within subjects. The logarithms of the neuronal sizes were used for analysis to correct for upwardly skewed distributions. Multiple comparisons were by Fisher’s protected least significant difference test and a significance level at p< 0.05.

Results

Figure 1 shows the dramatic effect of FRDA on DN neurons and their afferent terminals. Neuronal loss in JOFLS and LOFLS patients is approximately the same, as assessed by NSE reaction product. Glutamic acid decarboxylase reaction product around unstained neurons (“N” in Fig. 1d) may be interpreted as GABA-ergic terminals arising from Purkinje cells. Small neurons with very dense NSE reaction product persist and likely represent GABA-ergic nerve cells because pale cytoplasmic GAD reaction product is also present in similar small neurons (arrows in Fig. 1 d–f). The sections of FRDA patients show an overall decline of the density of GAD-positive terminals, but clusters of grumose degeneration are widespread (Fig. 1e–f). Figure 1f, representing a patient with very late onset (50 years) and protracted duration (33 years), suggests a slightly better retention of GAD-reactive terminals. A systematic comparison, however, of GAD immunoreactivity in DN of four additional patients with JOFLS (Fig. 2a–d) and four LOFLS (Fig. 2e–h) does not allow the conclusion that late onset and long survival invariably present better retention of corticonuclear terminals.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

GAD in the dentate nucleus of a normal control and patients with JOFLS and LOFLS. The top panel (ac) shows reaction product of NSE; the bottom panel (df) represents GAD. In the GAD-stained section of a normal control (d), neurons are shown as voids (N). (a) and (d), normal control; (b) and (e), JOFLS; (c) and (f), LOFLS. In JOFLS, only a few small NSE-reactive neurons remain (b), and GAD-positive terminals are greatly reduced (e) in comparison with the normal state (d). Neuronal loss in the patient with LOFLS (c) is comparable to JOFLS (b). GAD reaction product is reduced and disorganized (f). Arrows in (d), (e), and (f) point to pale cytoplasmic GAD reaction product in small GABA-ergic neurons of the DN. The clusters of GAD reaction product (asterisks in [e] and [f]) represent grumose degeneration. Figures (b) and (e) represent FRDA patient 7F in Table 1; (c) and (f) represent patient 17F in Table 1. Bars, 50 μm

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

GAD in the dentate nucleus of 4 patients with JOFLS and 4 patients with LOFLS. (a)–(d), JOFLS; (e)–(h), LOFLS. Disruption of GAD-reactive terminals affects all DN irrespective of age of onset. The microphotographs correspond to patients listed in Table 1 as follows: (a), 6M; (b), 8F; (c), 11M; (d), 10F; (e) 15F; (f),16F; (g), 17F; (h), 19M. The length of GAA trinucleotide repeat expansion does not appear to influence the severity of synaptic depletion as assessed by GAD immunocytochemistry. Bars, 50 μm

Figure 3 compares the DN in two young patients with very different disease durations with a normal control. The DN in a 19-year-old man with rapidly fatal cardiomyopathy but little ataxia over a 4-year-long course (Fig. 3a) contains many more neurons than the DN of a 24-year-old man with a more protracted illness (14 years) (Fig. 3c). The DN from the patient with short survival, however, may not be entirely normal because neurons are generally smaller (Fig. 3a) than normal (Fig. 3e). Artifact due to delayed fixation cannot be excluded. GAD reaction product in the DN of the patient with short survival remains abundant, and GAD-reactive grumose degeneration is absent. These clusters of abnormal GABA-ergic terminals are very prominent in the DN of a patient with a more protracted neurological disease (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Progressive atrophy of the DN in FRDA. (a, b), DN in a 19-year-old man with fatal cardiomyopathy but minimal ataxia, and death after a disease duration of 4 years; (c, d) DN of a 24-year-old man with cardiomyopathy and advanced neurological disability after a disease duration of 14 years. (e, f) normal control. (a), (c), (e), immunocytochemistry of NSE; (b), (d), (f) immunocytochemistry of GAD. In the case with rapidly fatal cardiomyopathy ([a]–[b]), numerous neurons are present in the DN though they appear smaller than normal (e). GABA-ergic terminals (b) are preserved, and grumose degeneration is absent. The voids labeled by “N” in (b) and (f) indicate the location of unstained nerve cells. In the patient with comparable age (c, d) but a much longer course, only a few small NSE-reactive neurons remain (c). GAD-immunocytochemistry shows much less reaction product in the neuropil, but many clusters of grumose degeneration are present (arrows in [d]). The DN of the patient with the more serious neurological phenotype (c, d) differs greatly from the normal control (e, f) and the short-term survivor (a, b). GAA trinucleotide repeats: (a, b), 1153/841; (c, d), 1050/700. Bars, 50 μm

Figure 4 displays a comparison of the thoracic spinal cord profiles of a normal control, JOFLS, and LOFLS after immunocytochemical visualization of MBP. Thoracic spinal cord profiles are significantly different (ANOVA; p= 0.003). In 12 patients with JOFLS, the cross-sectional area is 20.5±5.3 mm2 (mean±standard deviation), which is not significantly different from the mean of 4 cases with LOFLS (21.9±3.1 mm2) (Fisher’s test; p=0.65). Both JOFLS and LOFLS areas are significantly different from the mean of six normal thoracic spinal cords (30.4± 5.6 mm2): JOLFS vs. normal, p=0.006; LOFLS vs. normal, p=0.015. The thoracic spinal cord area of the 19-year-old man who died from cardiomyopathy within 4 years of onset is 34 mm2, which is in the normal range.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Size comparison of thoracic spinal cord in a normal control and patients with JOFLS and LOFLS. (a) normal thoracic spinal cord; (b) JOFLS; (c) LOFLS. The spinal cord areas are greatly reduced in FRDA, irrespective of age of FRDA onset. Fiber loss in dorsal columns, spinocerebellar, and corticospinal tracts is also comparable. The sections illustrated in (b) and (c) correspond to FRDA cases 14F and 16F, respectively. Immunostain for MBP. The illustration of the normal spinal cord in (a) was made from three overlapping microphotographs. Bars, 1 mm

Figure 5 compares a DRG of a normal control with JOFLS and LOFLS. The microphotographs were taken from comparable subcapsular regions where neurons are normally most abundant. The paucity of large neurons in the FRDA cases is apparent. The large number of nodules of Nageotte in JOFLS (Fig. 5b) may indicate a more aggressive disease process. Neuronal size in LOFLS (Fig. 5c), however, are not visibly larger than those in JOFLS (Fig. 5b)

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Dorsal root ganglion in a normal control and patients with JOFLS and LOFLS. (a) Normal; (b) JOFLS; (c) LOFLS. In JOFLS (b) and LOFLS (c), larger ganglion cells are absent. They are readily

The box plot in Fig. 6 displays the results of systematic measurements of neuronal areas in DRG of JOFLS, LOFLS, and matching controls. The unweighted means and standard deviations for JOFLS, JOFLS-controls, LOFLS, and LOFLS-controls are, in μm2, 1721±776, 2667±1193, 2142±1255, and 2793±1559, respectively. Neuronal areas are significantly different among the groups (ANOVA; p=0.001). The difference between the control groups is not significant (Fisher’s test; p=0.79). Both JOFLS and LOFLS are significantly different from their control groups (p=0.003 and p=0.033, respectively). The mean neuronal area in DRG of LOFLS is somewhat larger than that of JOFLS, but this difference does not achieve statistical significance (p=0.17).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Box plot of neuronal areas in DRG of JOFLS, LOFLS, and their respective controls. Individual neuronal sizes are shown on the right; boxes represent the median (center horizontal line); the mean (square symbol); the 25th and 75th percentile (the outer box); and the 5th and 95th percentile (the whiskers). Repeated measure ANOVA with Fisher’s least significant difference test demonstrates a significant effect of the experimental group (p=0.001) with both JOFLS and LOFLS being different from their respective controls (p=0.003 and p=0.033, respectively) but no difference between either control groups (p=0.79) or the JOFLS and LOFLS groups (p=0.17) seen in the normal DRG (asterisks in [a]). The DRG of JOFLS (b) shows an abundance of nodules of Nageotte that are absent in the DRG of LOFLS (c). Hematoxylin and eosin. Bars, 50 μm

Frataxin levels in LOFLS patients 17F and 18F (Table 1) were 26 and 25.8 ng/g wet weight, respectively. They were similar to those in JOFLS patients 5F (18.9), 6M (17.5), 7F (40.5), 10F (18.9), 11M (14.9), 13M (17.7), and 14F (21.6). Levels in two control DN were 137 and 263 ng/g wet weight, respectively.

Discussion

Long and Short Survival in FRDA and Correlation with GAA Repeats

The most common cause of death in FRDA is cardiomyopathy (Table 1) but patients with LOFLS generally have only the ataxic phenotype. In 13 of 14 patients with JOFLS (92.9%), heart disease was an immediate or contributing cause of death. In contrast, cardiomyopathy was the cause of death in only 1 of 5 patients with LOFLS (20%). Patients without cardiomyopathy generally have short GAA expansions on the smaller of the two alleles, and the data in Table 1 confirm the observations by others [4, 12]. The longer allele may not be irrelevant for disease duration and the neuropathological phenotype (Table 1). Patients with LOFLS have significantly shorter GAA expansions on both alleles when compared to JOFLS. Two-tailed t-tests of mean GAA trinucleotide repeat lengths yield p=0.026 for the longer alleles, and p=0.014 for the shorter alleles. Emphasis on a tight correlation between the shorter GAA trinucleotide repeat expansion and the clinical and pathological phenotypes may no longer be justified. Epigenetic phenomena in impaired frataxin gene transcription must also be taken into consideration (review in [13]). Frataxin levels in the dentate nucleus of LOFLS patients were not higher than in JOFLS, but measurement of this protein in autopsy tissues may not be an appropriate measure of disease severity. Loss of mitochondria-rich neurons and afferent terminals in the DN readily explain reduced levels in both groups though frataxin may have been higher at one time in patients with LOFLS.

The Natural History of the Lesion in DN, DRG, and Spinal Cord

The better condition of the DN in rapidly fatal FRDA-related cardiomyopathy (Fig. 3a–b) suggests that loss of neurons and corticonuclear terminals in more typical FRDA cases (Fig. 1b–c and e–f) is due to atrophy rather than hypoplasia. A combination of hypoplasia and atrophy, however, may exist in DRG and dorsal roots (DR). The absence of large myelinated fibers in DR may be attributed to lack of large DRG neurons [8, 14], but the smaller than normal neuronal size is not necessarily due to atrophy. DR actually display a normal abundance of axons and, peculiarly, a greater degree of myelination in comparison with the normal state [8]. It is unknown whether lack of neurons with a diameter in excess of 54 μm [14] represents postnatal shrinkage or developmental failure. Koeppen et al. [8] recently summarized the evidence for a developmental deficit of DRG in FRDA by attention to the neural crest.

The examination of DRG of older patients with FRDA must consider changes that are due to advancing age [15]. Nodules of Nageotte are more common in DRG of normal older persons, and Gardner [16] estimated that the number of neurons in the DRG of the eighth and ninth thoracic roots decreased by 30% between the ages of 50 and 80 years. In contrast, Ohta et al. [10] could not confirm a numerical reduction in DRG of the first sacral root of older persons. Also, neuronal diameters remained the same after acquiring a stable status after the first decade of life. This study is especially important for the interpretation of the reduced cytoplasmic areas of nerve cells reported here.

Narrow cervical spinal canals on plain X-ray films of patients with FRDA are consistent with hypoplasia of the spinal cord [17], and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirms thinning of the spinal cord at that level [18, 19]. Normal measurements in the 19-year-old patient with FRDA who died within 4 years of onset, however, implies that thinning of spinal cord in more typical cases also progresses. Neurons in DRG may never reach normal size, and DRG hypoplasia may contribute to thinning of the dorsal columns and a reduction of the anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the spinal cord (Fig. 4; ref [5]).

Clinicoanatomic Correlation

An unexpected outcome of the described study is the principal identity of FRDA lesions in JOFLS and LOFLS. Ultimately, all patients with FRDA, except those succumbing rapidly to cardiomyopathy, appear to undergo the same destruction of their central and peripheral nervous systems. The key question about patients with LOFLS is: What causes the late onset of their neurological manifestations? The likely answer is delayed atrophy of the DN. Morphological observations of autopsy tissues represent end-stage FRDA and do not provide sufficient insight into the course of DN atrophy. Progressive destruction of the DN can now be confirmed by serial MRI in living FRDA patients. Due to its high iron content, the DN can be visualized on T2-weighted images at high field strengths, and changing size and signal hypointensity may be used to monitor the lesion and assess possible therapeutic benefit [20, 21].

A common feature in LFOS patients is the significantly shorter GAA trinucleotide repeat expansion in both alleles (Table 1). Since triplet repeats enhance heterochromatin formation and promote gene silencing [13], shorter GAA trinucleotide repeats in LOFLS patients may provide early protection against more serious frataxin deficiency. In theory, frataxin transcription in LOFLS is more efficient because epigenetic effects are less prominent.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the families for their permission to complete the autopsies and the pathologists who harvested the tissues. The following organizations provided financial support: Friedreich’s Ataxia Research Alliance; National Ataxia Foundation; and Neurochemical Research, Inc. The described work was completed in the research laboratories of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albany, N.Y., USA.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Arnulf H. Koeppen, Email: arnulf.koeppen@med.va.gov, Research Service (151), VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, USA. Neurology Service, VA Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA. Departments of Neurology and Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA

Jennifer A. Morral, Research Service (151), VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, USA

Rodney D. McComb, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA

Paul J. Feustel, Department of Neuropharmacology and Neurosciences, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA

References

  • 1.Harding AE. Friedreich’s ataxia: A clinical and genetic study of 90 families with an analysis of early diagnostic criteria and intrafamilial clustering of clinical features. Brain. 1981;104:589–620. doi: 10.1093/brain/104.3.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Michele G, Filla A, Perretti A, Santoro L, Trombeta L, Santorelli F, et al. Late onset recessive ataxia with Friedreich’s disease phenotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:1398–401. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.12.1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Campuzano V, Montermini L, Moltò MD, Pianese L, Cossée M, Cavalcanti F, et al. Friedreich’s ataxia: autosomal recessive disease caused by an intronic GAA triplet repeat expansion. Science. 1996;271:1423–7. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5254.1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dürr A, Cossée M, Agid Y, Campuzano V, Mignard C, Penet C, et al. Clinical and genetic abnormalities in patients with Friedreich’s ataxia. New Engl J Med. 1996;335:1169–75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610173351601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koeppen AH. Neuropathology of the inherited ataxias. In: Manto M-U, Pandolfo M, editors. The cerebellum and its disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 387–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Michael S, Petrocine SV, Qian J, Lamarche JB, Knutson MD, Garrick MD, et al. Iron and iron-responsive proteins in the cardiomyopathy of Friedreich’s ataxia. Cerebellum. 2007;5:257–67. doi: 10.1080/14734220600913246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koeppen AH, Michael SC, Knutson MD, Haile DJ, Qian J, Levi S, et al. The dentate nucleus in Friedreich’s ataxia: the role of iron-responsive proteins. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:163–73. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0220-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koeppen AH, Morral JA, Davis AN, Qian J, Petrocine SV, Knutson MD, et al. The dorsal root ganglion in Friedreich’s ataxia. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;118:763–76. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0589-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Friedreich N. Ueber Ataxie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der hereditären Formen. Nachtrag Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1877;70:140–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ohta M, Offord K, Dyck PJ. Morphometric evaluation of first sacral ganglia of man. J Neurol Sci. 1974;22:73–82. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(74)90055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Condò I, Ventura N, Malisan F, Tomassini B, Testi R. A pool of extramitochondrial frataxin that promotes cell survival. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:16750–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511960200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Isnard R, Kalotka H, Dürr A, Cossée M, Schmitt M, Pousset F, et al. Correlation between left ventricular hypertrophy and GAA trinucleotide repeat length in Friedreich’s ataxia. Circulation. 1997;95:2247–9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.9.2247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wells RD. DNA triplexes and Friedreich ataxia. FASEB J. 2008;22:1625–34. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-097857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Inoue K, Hirano A, Hasson J. Friedreich’s ataxia selectively involves the large neurons of the dorsal root ganglia. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1979;104:75–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Scharf J-H, Blumenthal H-J. Neuere Aspekte zur altersabhängigen Involution des sensiblen peripheren Nervensystems. Zeitschrift Zellforsch. 1967;78:280–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gardner E. Decrease in human neurons with age. Anat Rec. 1940;77:529–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vassilopoulos D, Spengos M, Scarpalezos S. Étude radiologique de la colonne vertébrale cervicale dans certaines maladies dégéneratives neurologiques. J Radiol Electrol. 1977;58:183–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wessel K, Schroth G, Diener HC, Müller-Forell W, Dichgans J. Significance of MRI-confirmed atrophy of the cranial spinal cord in Friedreich’s ataxia. Euro Arch Psychiat Neurol Sci. 1989;238:225–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00381470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mascalchi M, Salvi F, Piacentini S, Bartolozzi C. Friedreich’s ataxia: MR findings involving the cervical portion of the spinal cord. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:187–91. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.1.8010211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Waldvogel D, van Gelderen P, Hallett M. Increased iron in the dentate nucleus of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:123–5. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199907)46:1<123::aid-ana19>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boddaert N, Le Quan KH, Rötig A, Leroy-Willig A, Gallet S, Brunnelle F, et al. Selective iron chelation in Friedreich ataxia: biologic and clinical implications. Blood. 2007;110:401–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-12-065433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES