Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2016 May 26;7:11725. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11725

BDNF rescues BAF53b-dependent synaptic plasticity and cocaine-associated memory in the nucleus accumbens

André O White 1,2,3, Enikö A Kramár 1,2,3, Alberto J López 1,2,3, Janine L Kwapis 1,2,3,4, John Doan 1,2,3, David Saldana 1,2,3, M Felicia Davatolhagh 5, Yasaman Alaghband 1,2,3, Mathew Blurton-Jones 1,4,6, Dina P Matheos 1,2,3, Marcelo A Wood 1,2,3,4,a
PMCID: PMC4894971  PMID: 27226355

Abstract

Recent evidence implicates epigenetic mechanisms in drug-associated memory processes. However, a possible role for one major epigenetic mechanism, nucleosome remodelling, in drug-associated memories remains largely unexplored. Here we examine mice with genetic manipulations targeting a neuron-specific nucleosome remodelling complex subunit, BAF53b. These mice display deficits in cocaine-associated memory that are more severe in BAF53b transgenic mice compared with BAF53b heterozygous mice. Similar to the memory deficits, theta-induced long-term potentiation (theta-LTP) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is significantly impaired in slices taken from BAF53b transgenic mice but not heterozygous mice. Further experiments indicate that theta-LTP in the NAc is dependent on TrkB receptor activation, and that BDNF rescues theta-LTP and cocaine-associated memory deficits in BAF53b transgenic mice. Together, these results suggest a role for BAF53b in NAc neuronal function required for cocaine-associated memories, and also that BDNF/TrkB activation in the NAc may overcome memory and plasticity deficits linked to BAF53b mutations.


Inline graphicEpigenetic mechanisms play a key role in drug-associated memories and behaviors. Here authors show that mice deficient of BAF53b, a nucleosome remodeling complex subunit, display deficits in synaptic plasticity and cocaine-associated memory, both of which can be rescued by BDNF application.


Drug addiction is characterized by compulsive drug-seeking behaviour despite negative consequences1. In the field of substance abuse, there remains unanswered questions about how drugs of abuse drive the establishment of long-lasting changes in the brain that support robust drug-associated behaviours and memories. A central feature of drugs of abuse that distinguishes them from non-addictive drugs is their ability to promote persistent changes in neuronal function in the reward pathways of the brain2,3,4. For example, cocaine is known to generate changes in histone modification patterns that result in aberrant gene expression profiles and synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) that drive several cocaine-seeking behaviours5,6,7,8,9,10,11.

Increasing evidence supports a role for epigenetic mechanisms in memory formation (for a review, see ref. 12). In particular, epigenetic mechanisms such as histone modification are integral for the formation of drug-associated memories and behaviours13,14. The basic repeating subunit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which comprises a DNA–histone complex that packages genomic DNA. Several epigenetic mechanisms including posttranslational histone modification, DNA methylation and non-coding RNA serve as key regulators of chromatin structure and gene expression that are required for aspects of drug-associated behaviours (see reviews14,15,16). For example, histone acetylation and methylation mechanisms are pivotal for cocaine-induced changes in gene expression that underlie cocaine-induced behaviours and cocaine-context-associated memories6,7,8,9,10,11,17,18. However, there is a fourth major epigenetic mechanism (ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling) that regulates transcription by altering chromatin structure19. Currently, it remains unclear to what extent ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complexes are involved in drug-induced behaviours and drug-associated memories.

Nucleosome remodelling complexes are evolutionarily conserved multi-subunit complexes that replace, eject and alter nucleosomes to promote changes in gene expression20. Through their ATPase subunit, nucleosome remodelling complexes manipulate nucleosome–DNA contacts through ATP hydrolysis, thereby allowing the binding of the transcription machinery and associated transcriptional regulators19,20. A recent study identified the neuron-specific nucleosome remodeller, nBAF, as a regulator of gene expression necessary for neuronal differentiation21, dendritic branching22, hippocampal synaptic plasticity and hippocampus-dependent long-term memory23. nBAF contains one of two ATPase subunits (Brm or Brg1), which is necessary for ATP hydrolysis during nucleosome remodelling24. The nBAF complex also contains a unique subunit called Baf53b (also referred to as Actl6b), which appears critical for nBAF to target specific promoter regions22. BAF53b is only expressed in postmitotic neurons and only found in the nBAF complex22,25. The unusual dedication of BAF53b to the nBAF complex, as well its neuronal specificity, makes BAF53b the ideal target with which to examine the role of nucleosome remodelling complexes in cocaine-associated behaviours and memories. We examined whether BAF53b has a role in the formation of cocaine-associated behaviours and memories using mice that had either a deletion mutation or traditional heterozygous knockout of BAF53b.

The role of neuron-specific nucleosome remodelling factors in drug-associated memory formation and their influence on synaptic plasticity in the NAc has not been previously explored. Therefore, we extended our studies to examine the role of BAF53b in long-term potentiation (LTP) in NAc, as LTP is thought to be a candidate mechanism underlying long-term memory formation. First, we established a stimulation protocol that induced LTP using theta stimulation (theta-LTP) in slices from wild-type (WT) mice and compared the level of stable potentiation with that achieved in slices from BAF53b mutant mice. Next, we tested the possibility that (1) theta-LTP in the NAc requires TrkB receptor activation and (2) whether the ligand for TrkB, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), could reverse deficits in theta-LTP and cocaine-associated memory observed in BAF53b mutant mice. Together, these experiments provide the first evidence for a role of neuron-specific nucleosome remodelling complexes in cocaine-associated memory formation and a potential mechanism for correcting related plasticity deficits in the NAc.

Results

Characterization of BAF53b mutant mice

nBAF is a multi-subunit complex that is neuron specific (Fig. 1a). It is defined, in part, by the BAF53b subunit (highlighted in yellow), which is only found in the nBAF complex22,25. BAF53b is expressed in the NAc, a brain area required for cocaine-associated memory formation. BAF53b homozygous knockout mice (Baf53b−/−) do not survive into adulthood22. Therefore, to study the role of BAF53b in cocaine-associated memories and behaviours, we examined a deletion mutation of Baf53b (Baf53bΔHD). We previously demonstrated that a similar deletion of the hydrophobic domain of BAF53a (the non-neuronal homologue of BAF53b) generates a dominant negative form of BAF53a26. The transgene in the Baf53bΔHD line is expressed via the CaMKIIα promoter (Fig. 1b)23,27,28. Both WT BAF53b and the BAF53bΔHD mutant protein interact with Brg1, as demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation of either WT or BAF53bΔHD with Brg1 (Fig. 1c). Using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, we verified transgene expression in the NAc (Fig. 1d). In addition to transgenic Baf53bΔHD mice, we also examined a Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mouse line22,23. Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice have ∼50% Baf53b messenger RNA and protein expression in the hippocampus23. Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR revealed that Baf53b mRNA expression in the NAc of Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice was significantly reduced (∼50%) compared with their WT littermates (Fig. 1e). Both genetically modified mouse lines have previously been shown to be indistinguishable from WT littermates with respect to locomotor activity, anxiety, short-term memory and basal synaptic transmission21.

Figure 1. Characterization of Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout and Baf53bΔHD mice.

Figure 1

(a) nBAF complex is combinatorially assembled, meaning that the individual subunits included in each unique complex can alter CRC function20 containing the dedicated and neuron-specific subunit BAF53b (highlighted in yellow). (b) WT Baf53b is illustrated with the hydrophobic domain (grey). Amino acids 323–333 in the hydrophobic domain were deleted to generate the BAF53bΔHD construct. This Baf53bΔHD mutant sequence was then cloned into a separate vector containing intron and exon sequences with splice sites and the SV40 intron and polyadenylation signal, which was then cloned downstream of the 8.5-kb mouse CamkIIα promoter23. This construct was then used to generate the Baf53bΔHD transgenic mice. (c) Immunoprecipitation and western blotting showing that Brg1 co-immunoprecipitates with BAF53b and BAF53bΔHD. (d) RT–qPCR revealed that the BAF53bΔHD transgene is only expressed in the BAF53bΔHD mutant mice and not in their WT littermates. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. (e) RT–qPCR revealed that Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mice (n=8) have significantly reduced WT Baf53b expression in the NAc compared with their WT littermates (n=7; t(13)=10.25, P<0.0001).

BAF53b mutant mice have normal cocaine sensitization

We investigated the role of BAF53b in cocaine sensitivity. We and other laboratories have shown that histone-modifying enzymes can play a role in cocaine-induced sensitization and responses to repeated cocaine administration6,7,18,29. Therefore, to test whether BAF53b plays a role in cocaine sensitivity, Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice were given acute or chronic cocaine treatments followed by assessment of locomotor activity (Fig. 2a). A 10-mg kg−1 cocaine dose, which generates robust sensitization, was used as in our previous experiments (ref. 6). Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice were assessed for locomotor deficits (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Heterozygous knockout of BAF53b did not affect baseline locomotor activity during habituation (Supplementary Fig. 1b). In addition, both Baf53b+/− heterozygous and WT mice had similar responses to chronic cocaine administration, with both groups showing a graded increase in their response to cocaine indicative of cocaine sensitization (Fig. 2b). Similarly, no differences were observed between Baf53b+/− heterozygous and WT mice after acute cocaine administration (Fig. 2c). Therefore, we found that the loss of one allele of Baf53b did not alter cocaine sensitivity, as Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice performed comparably with WT littermates.

Figure 2. BAF53b mutant mice have normal cocaine sensitization.

Figure 2

(a) Schematic representation of cocaine sensitization procedure. (b) Throughout conditioning, chronic cocaine-treated Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mice (n=8) travelled the same mean distance ±s.e.m. as chronic cocaine-treated WT littermates (n=8; significant main effect of injection day, F4,56=13.90, P<0.0001; no main effect of genotype, F1,14=0.24, P=0.6; no interaction, F4,56=0.78, P=0.54). (c) Acute cocaine-treated Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mice (n=9) travelled the same distance as acute cocaine-treated WT littermates (n=8; significant main effect of injection day, F4,60=11.78, P<0.0001; no main effect of genotype, F1,15=2.70, P=0.12; no interaction, F4,60=0.24, P=0.92). (d) Both Baf53bΔHD and WT mice had a similar response to chronic cocaine administration with both groups showing a graded increase in their response to cocaine indicative of cocaine sensitization (significant main effect of injection day, F4,52=20.54, P<0.0001; no main effect of genotype, F1,13=0.23, P=0.64; no interaction, F4,52=0.76, P=0.56). (e) Similarly, no differences were observed between Baf53bΔHD and WT mice after acute cocaine administration (significant main effect of injection day, F4,52=14.46, P<0.0001; no main effect of genotype, F1,13=0.01, P=0.94; no interaction, F4,52=0.78, P=0.55).

Similarly, we investigated whether the deletion mutant of BAF53b would affect cocaine sensitivity. Baf53bΔHD mice were given acute or chronic cocaine treatments and their locomotor activity recorded in the same manner as the Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice. A 10-mg kg−1 cocaine dose was used as in the previous experiment. Baf53bΔHD mice displayed normal baseline locomotor activity during habituation (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Both Baf53bΔHD and WT mice had a similar response to chronic cocaine administration indicative of cocaine sensitization (Fig. 2d). Similarly, no differences were observed between Baf53bΔHD and WT mice after acute cocaine administration (Fig. 2e). Therefore, we found that the deletion mutation did not alter cocaine sensitivity, as Baf53bΔHD mice performed comparably with WT littermates. Overall, these results suggest that BAF53b is not required for cocaine sensitization.

BAF53b is required for cocaine-associated memory

To examine the role of BAF53b in cocaine-associated memory formation, we used cocaine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). The CPP paradigm involves animals associating the rewarding properties of cocaine with a distinct cocaine-paired context compared with a distinct vehicle-paired context (Fig. 3a). The strength of the association is then tested while the animal is in a drug-free state. In the first experiment, Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice and WT littermates were conditioned using 5 mg kg−1 cocaine (Fig. 3b). Neither Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice nor WTs displayed an initial preference for either context before conditioning (pre-test). After conditioning with two pairings of cocaine, post-test results revealed that WT mice had a robust CPP score (time spent in cocaine-paired chamber minus saline-paired chamber). In contrast, Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice did not display a cocaine-associated CPP, spending similar time in both cocaine-paired and saline-paired chambers after conditioning. We examined the locomotor activity during the test days to assess whether there were any differences in the locomotor activating effect of cocaine in Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice compared with WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 2a). We observed no differences in locomotor activity between Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice and WT controls on either test day (Supplementary Fig. 2b). These results suggest that the loss of one allele of Baf53b significantly disrupts cocaine CPP at 5 mg kg−1 without altering overall locomotor performance.

Figure 3. Mutant mice have impairments in cocaine CPP.

Figure 3

(a) Schematic representation of cocaine-CPP procedure. (b) Cocaine-CPP expression indicated by mean CPP score (CS+ minus CS−)±s.e.m. At 5 mg kg−1 cocaine dose, Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mice (n=10) exhibited significantly attenuated CPP score compared with WT littermates (n=8). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant main effect of genotype (F1,16=6.99, P=0.02). No effect of conditioning was observed (F1,16=2.05, P=0.17) but there was a significant interaction (F1,16=4.93, P=0.04). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed no initial preference for either context on the pretest (t=0.46, P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the WT and Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice on the posttest (t=3.45, P<0.01). (c) At 10 mg kg−1 cocaine dose, Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mice (n=9) exhibit similar CPP score to WT littermates (n=8). Using a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, we found a significant main effect of conditioning (F1,17=112.81, P<0.0001) but not genotype (F1,17=0.24, P=0.63) and no interaction (F1,17=0.14, P=0.71). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed no difference between the WT and the Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice on the pretest (t=0.21, P>0.05) or posttest (t=0.61, P>0.05). (d) At 5 mg kg−1 cocaine dose, Baf53bΔHD mice (n=9) exhibited significantly attenuated CPP score compared with WT littermates (n=10). Using a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, we found significant main effects on conditioning (F1,17=29.19, P<0.0001) and genotype (F1,17=5.62, P=0.03), but no interaction (F1,17=2.56, P=0.13). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed no differences between the preference of WT and Baf53bΔHD mice for either context on the pretest (t=0.83, P>0.05) but a significant difference on the posttest (t=2.85, P<0.05). (e) At a 10-mg kg−1 cocaine dose, Baf53bΔHD mice (n=10) exhibited significantly attenuated CPP score compared with WT littermates (n=7). A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of conditioning (F1,15=47.37, P<0.0001), genotype (F1,15=7.91, P=0.01) and an interaction (F1,15=5.71, P=0.03). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed no differences between the preference of WT and BAF53bΔHD.

Next, we were interested in determining whether there was a dose-dependent role for BAF53b in cocaine CPP. Therefore, we conducted a separate CPP experiment at 10 mg kg−1 cocaine using a different cohort of Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice (Fig. 3c). Similar to the previous CPP experiment, neither Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice nor WT mice displayed an initial preference for either context. At post test, both WT and Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice established a preference for the cocaine-paired context. Therefore, unlike the 5-mg kg−1 CPP experiment, one Baf53b allele is sufficient for cocaine CPP when using a 10-mg kg−1 cocaine dose. We also examined the locomotor activity during the 10-mg kg−1 experiment, to assess whether there were any differences in the locomotor-activating effect of cocaine in the Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice compared with WT mice at 10 mg kg−1 (Supplementary Fig. 2c). However, no differences were observed between Baf53b+/− heterozygous and WT mice on test days. Together, these results suggest that removal of one Baf53b allele disrupts cocaine CPP memory formation in a cocaine dose-dependent manner (at 5 mg kg−1 but not at 10 mg kg−1). Importantly, all Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice travelled similar distances to their respective WT controls on test days, indicating no differential effects of cocaine on locomotor performance.

We then examined whether Baf53bΔHD mice had similar memory deficits to Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice using a CPP experiment (Fig. 3d). Neither Baf53bΔHD mice nor WT mice displayed an initial preference for either context on the pretest. Baf53bΔHD mice and WT littermates were conditioned using 5 mg kg−1 cocaine. After conditioning, WT mice acquired a robust CPP, whereas Baf53bΔHD mice displayed a significantly reduced CPP. We observed no differences in locomotor activity between Baf53bΔHD mice and WT controls on either test day (Supplementary Fig. 2d). These findings further suggest that BAF53b is important for the formation of cocaine CPP at 5 mg kg−1.

To evaluate whether there was a dose-dependent role of BAF53b in cocaine CPP, we performed a 10-mg kg−1 cocaine CPP experiment in a different cohort of Baf53bΔHD mice (Fig. 3e). Similar to the previous experiment, neither Baf53bΔHD mice nor WT mice displayed an initial preference for either context before conditioning. After conditioning, WT mice displayed a robust preference for the cocaine-paired compartment. However, unlike the Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice at 10 mg kg−1, Baf53bΔHD mice demonstrated a significantly reduced CPP post test. These results indicate that the Baf53bΔHD mutation disrupts the formation of cocaine-associated CPP in both doses of cocaine (at 5 and 10 mg kg−1). No differences in locomotor activity were observed between Baf53bΔHD mice and their WT littermates during the 10-mg kg−1 experiment (Supplementary Fig. 2e). Therefore, CPP deficits observed in the Baf53bΔHD mice appear to be independent of any locomotor impairment. Together, these data from the Baf53bΔHD and Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice suggest that BAF53b plays a key role in the acquisition/consolidation of cocaine-associated CPP. However, there remains the open question of what accounts for the more severe cocaine-memory impairments observed in the Baf53bΔHD mice compared with the Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice.

BAF53bΔHD mice have deficits in synaptic plasticity

The observed differences in cocaine-associated memory between the Baf53bΔHD and Baf53b+/− heterozygous mouse lines led us to investigate whether synaptic plasticity was differentially altered. One of the likeliest candidates for how associative memories are generated is through changes in synaptic plasticity. Brain regions within the reward pathway such as the NAc display LTP and long-term depression30,31; however, it remains unknown as to how disruption of BAF53b within the NAc influences long-term synaptic plasticity in that region. Thus, we conducted a study using parasagittal slices containing the NAc core from (1) Baf53b+/− heterozygous, (2) Baf53bΔHD and (3) WT littermate mice, to examine BAF53b influences on LTP (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4. Mutation of BAF53b disrupts LTP in NAc core slices.

Figure 4

(a) Photomicrograph of a parasagittal slice containing NAc and the relative position of the stimulation (red arrow) and recording (green arrow) electrodes (1.08 lateral to mid-sagittal plane).aca, anterior commissure; AcbC, accumbens nucleus core; CPu, caudate putamen; Hipp., hippocampus. (b) Representative trace of glutamatergic transmission collected within the NAc (black line) that is blocked by AMPA and NMDA receptor antagonists, 20 μM DNQX and 50 μM D-APV, respectively (red line). Scale bar, 0.2 mV, 10 ms. (c) Left, input/output curves measuring the slope of the fEPSP response across a range of stimulation currents (10–80 μA) was comparable between Baf53b+/− (dark blue circles, n=9), Baf53bΔHD (light blue circles, n=9) and WT (WT) (brown circles, n=9) mice (F2,24=0.15, P=0.81). Right, representative traces collected during the generation of input/output curves from WT, Baf53b+/− and Baf53bΔHD slices (scale bar, 0.2 mV per, 5 ms). (d) Paired-pulse facilitation of the initial slope of the synaptic response was comparable (40, 100 and 200 ms inter-pulse intervals) in slices from Baf53b+/− (blue circles, n=9), Baf53bΔHD (light blue circles, n=10) and WT (brown circles, n=8) mice (F2,24=0.16, P=0.96). (e) Left, LTP induced using TBS (black arrows) produced stable potentiation in slices from WT mice (brown circles). Short-term potentiation measured 5 min post TBS was no different between groups (F2,25=6.22, P=0.11). Although potentiation measured 50–60 min post TBS was marginally reduced in slices from Baf53b+/− (blue circles, n=9), LTP in slices from Baf53bΔHD mice (light blue circles, n=10) was significantly impaired relative to control WT slices (brown circles, n=9) (F2,25=31.79, P=0.0013). Right, fEPSP traces collected during baseline (grey line) and 1 h after TBS (coloured line). Scale bar, 0.2 mV per, 5 ms.

First, we established that the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials generated within the core following afferent stimulation of glutamatergic fibres that form synapses on medium spiny neurons were blocked by AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid) and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antagonists, DNQX and D-APV, respectively (Fig. 4b). Low-intensity, single pulse stimulation of afferent fibres within the core produced similar field responses to those described in previous studies32,33,34. Next, we generated input/output curves to determine whether the slope of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) responses across a range of stimulation currents differed between the two genetically modified mice relative to WT controls (Fig. 4c). No differences were found between groups. Next, we tested for differences in transmitter release kinetics using paired-pulse facilitation. The Baf53b+/− heterozygous and Baf53bΔHD slices did not differ from WT slices (Fig. 4d). Taken together, these results indicated that genetic manipulation of BAF53b did not alter conventional measures of baseline synaptic transmission in the NAc core.

We then examined LTP using theta burst stimulation (TBS). Trains of five theta bursts, which has been previously shown to be the threshold for inducing stable potentiation in mice23, produced a robust and immediate potentiation in WT slices, which briefly decayed over a 10–15-min period, to stabilize at ∼70% above the pre-TBS baseline (Fig. 4e). Slices containing NAc core from Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice exhibited normal short-term potentiation that was no different from WT values but the level of LTP 60 min post TBS was slightly attenuated relative to controls. In contrast, TBS delivered to Baf53bΔHD slices produced a profound deficit in LTP. Short-term potentiation was comparable to WT controls, but the level of potentiation 60 min post TBS was remarkably reduced compared with WT controls. Collectively, these findings suggest that BAF53b plays a pivotal role in the cellular processes that maximize synaptic strength in the NAc. This result is particularly pronounced in the Baf53bΔHD slices and correlates with the greater cocaine-associated memory impairment observed in this transgenic mutant line (Fig. 3).

BDNF reverses LTP and CPP deficits in BAF53bΔHD mice

In an effort to restore deficits in cocaine memory and synaptic plasticity, we explored the role of BDNF in the NAc. BDNF is a potent positive neuromodulator in the brain and has been reported to play an important role in influencing addictive-type behaviours (see reviews35,36). Given that BDNF is released from terminals following TBS37,38 and effectively facilitates LTP39,40,41 and memory in rodents42, we tested the possibility that increasing exogenous levels of BDNF in the slice would reverse the impairment in LTP in Baf53bΔHD slices.

It was critical to first establish whether LTP in the NAc was BDNF/TrkB receptor dependent. We used a novel TrkB receptor antagonist, ANA12 (ref. 43), to test whether blocking TrkB receptor activation would inhibit theta-LTP. As summarized in Fig. 5a, the compound had no measureable influence on baseline synaptic transmission elicited by stimulation of afferent glutamatergic fibres, but effectively blocked theta burst-induced LTP. Following a 60-min washout of the drug, a second set of theta stimulation produced stable LTP, suggesting that the compound is fully reversible. These data indicate that TrkB activation has a role in the consolidation of LTP in the NAc.

Figure 5. Infusions of BDNF reverse LTP deficit in Baf53bΔHD slices.

Figure 5

(a) Bath application of 500 nM ANA12 blocked theta burst-induced LTP (TBS1) in NAc (n=6) in slices from WT mice. A 60-min period of ANA12 washout restored LTP after a second bout of theta stimulation (TBS2) in the same stimulated pathway. Inset, representative traces collected during baseline (grey line), 60 min post-TBS1 (blue line) and 60 min post-TBS2 (dark blue line). Scale bar, 0.4 mV, 5 ms. (b) Infusion of BDNF (2 nM) began after a 15-min stable baseline recording. BDNF produced a rapid increase in glutamatergic transmission (∼35%) within the NAc in slices from both WT (n=6) and Baf53bΔHD (n=5) mice. Before delivery of theta bursts, stimulation intensity was reduced to reset baseline to pre-drug levels, to evaluate the effects of BDNF on the magnitude of LTP (dotted downward arrow). Five theta trains (five theta bursts each, separated by 1 min) delivered 5 min after re-establishing stable baseline recordings (upward arrow) produced robust and stable LTP in WT slices and completely reversed the LTP impairment previously seen in slices from Baf53bΔHD mice (see Fig. 4e). Inset, representative traces collected during baseline (grey line), 30 min after start of BDNF infusion (blue line) and 60 min post TBS (dark blue line). Scale bar. 0.4 mV, 5 ms. (c) Pretreatment with 500 nM ANA12 completely blocked BDNF-induced increases in baseline synaptic transmission. The delivery of TBS produced a brief short-term potentiation that rapidly returned towards baseline levels (n=6). Inset, representative traces collected during baseline (grey line) and 60 min post TBS (black line). Scale bar, 0.5 mV, 5 ms.

We then examined whether increasing exogenous levels of BDNF in the slice preparation would alter baseline synaptic transmission and reverse LTP impairment in Baf53bΔHD slices. Administration of recombinant BDNF generated a rapid increase in fEPSP slope in NAc slices from WT and Baf53bΔHD mice (Fig. 5b). This effect was significantly above baseline within 30 min after the start of BDNF infusion. Stimulation intensity was then adjusted to pre-drug baseline levels and TBS was applied to determine the magnitude of LTP in the presence of BDNF for both Baf53bΔHD and WT controls. Both groups displayed robust potentiation that remained stable for the remainder of the recording period. In a follow-up experiment, we were interested in determining whether the BDNF-induced increase in synaptic transmission and LTP were dependent on TrkB receptor activation. Slices from WT mice were pretreated with the ANA12 compound 20 min before a 30 min co-application of BDNF followed by TBS. As shown in Fig. 5c, the TrkB receptor antagonist blocked BDNF-induced increases in baseline synaptic transmission and theta-LTP. These data are similar to a previous report, indicating that BDNF release promotes LTP in the dorsal striatum44. Taken together, BDNF appears to function as a neuromodulator at synapses on medium spiny neurons within the NAc core and activating its receptor, TrkB, circumvents the BAF53bΔHD-induced LTP deficits by producing potentiation levels comparable to control levels as observed in WT slices.

Given that exogenous recombinant human BDNF was sufficient to rescue theta-LTP deficits in Baf53bΔHD slices, we extended these findings by testing whether viral delivery of human BDNF into the NAc would rescue the CPP deficits (Fig. 6a). We infused either AAV2-mCherry-BDNF or AAV2-mCherry (control) into the NAc of WT (WT+BDNF; WT+mCherry) and Baf53bΔHD (Baf53bΔHD+BDNF; Baf53bΔHD+mCherry) mice. After a 2-week recovery period, we evaluated each group's capacity for cocaine-associated memory formation using CPP (Fig. 6b). No group displayed a significant chamber preference on the pretest. At post test, both WT+BDNF and WT+mCherry groups displayed a robust CPP. The Baf53bΔHD+mCherry group failed to establish a CPP, as predicted. In contrast, the Baf53bΔHD+BDNF group displayed a preference for the cocaine-paired chamber comparable to the WT groups. These results suggest that viral delivery of human BDNF rescued the CPP impairments in this mutant line.

Figure 6. Viral overexpression of BDNF reverses CPP and LTP deficits in Baf53bΔHD mice.

Figure 6

(a) Immunohistological image showing viral expression in the NAc using mCherry (red), BDNF (green) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 100 μm. Schematic representation of cocaine-CPP procedure. (b) Cocaine-CPP expression indicated by mean CPP score (CS+versus CS−)±s.e.m. At 5 mg kg−1 cocaine dose, WT+mCherry (n=15) and WT+BDNF (n=16) robust CPP. Baf53bΔHD+BDNF (n=12) established a CPP comparable to WT groups. Baf53bΔHD+mCherry (n=14) exhibited significantly attenuated CPP score compared with WT groups. A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant main effect of group (F3,53=3.08, P=0.035) and conditioning (F3,53=95.10, P<0.0001) There was a significant interaction (F3, 53=2.90, P=0.043). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed no initial preference for either context on the pretest (t=2.861, P<0.05). (c) Left, the initial expression of LTP was significantly greater in WT+BDNF slices (n=7) relative to WT+mCherry (t15=2.32, P=0.018) slices (n=10), as was the level of potentiation 60 min after TBS in the former group (t15=6.95, P<0.0001). In contrast, slices (n=9) from Baf53bΔHD+BDNF mice produced a similar level of short-term potentiation as found in slices (n=8) from Baf53bΔHD+mCherry mice (t15=1.14, P=0.13); however, virally expressing BDNF in Baf53bΔHD mice rescued the impairment in LTP found in slices from mice expressing the control mCherry-linked virus (t15=6.10, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the level of potentiation at 60 min post TBS between WT+mCherry and Baf53bΔHD+BDNF slices (t17=P=0.09). Right, representative traces collected during initial baseline recordings (grey line) and 60 min post TBS (black line) for each group. Scale bar, 5 ms per, 0.5 mV. (d) Left, virally expressing BDNF caused a significant increase in paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) at the shortest interval tested (40 ms) in slices from both WT and Baf53bΔHD mice (F3,30=13.8, P=0.025). Right, representative examples of PPF recorded at 40 ms interstimulus interval for each group tested. Traces of the first (solid black line) and second (dotted black line) fEPSPs are superimposed. Scale bar, 5 ms per, 0.5 mV. (e) Input/Output curves measuring the slope of the fEPSP response across a range of stimulation currents (10–80 μA) was comparable among all groups (F3,30=0.25, P=0.87).

We later evaluated the effects of the BDNF virus on synaptic function in the NAc using a subset of mice from each group tested in CPP. We found that theta-induced potentiation in slices from control mice (WT+mCherry) was similar to that found in slices from WT mice without any virus (see Fig. 4e); however, slices from BDNF-expressing control mice (WT+BDNF) produced a dramatic increase in potentiation, minutes following LTP induction and 60 min after TBS (Fig. 6c). We then examined slices from Baf53bΔHD+mCherry group and, as predicted, LTP was significantly reduced 60 min post induction. In accordance with the behavioural results, LTP was rescued in slices taken from the Baf53bΔHD+BDNF group (Fig. 6c). We were also interested in determining whether chronic exposure to BDNF may have altered presynaptic release. As shown in Fig. 6d, both groups injected with the BDNF virus (WT+BDNF and Baf53bΔHD+BDNF) showed a significant increase in paired-pulse facilitation at the shortest interpulse interval tested as compared with their respective control vehicle groups (WT+mCherry and Baf53bΔHD+mCherry). Finally, we also measured for changes in neuronal excitability between groups by generating an input/output curve. We found no difference between groups across a range of stimulation intensities (Fig. 6e). The results of our electrophysiological and behavioural tests indicate that viral infusion of human BDNF is sufficient to rescue cocaine-associated memory and synaptic function in Baf53bΔHD mutant mice. Collectively, our results suggest that manipulation of BDNF/TrkB receptor activation can overcome the cocaine memory and plasticity deficits caused by deleting the hydrophobic domain of BAF53b.

Discussion

Understanding how drugs of abuse alter neuronal function in the reward pathway can provide insight into how these drugs support the formation of persistent drug-associated memories. Emerging molecular and cellular research has established roles for epigenetic mechanisms in drug-induced behaviours and drug-associated memory formation. In the current study, we investigated the role of the neuron-specific nucleosome remodelling subunit BAF53b in cocaine-associated memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Genetic manipulations targeting the BAF53b subunit produced severe impairments in cocaine-associated memory and synaptic plasticity. Moreover, the degree of deficits observed in cocaine-associative memory correlated with the degree of impairments observed in theta-LTP in the NAc of mutant mice. These deficits in theta-LTP and CPP were rescued using BDNF administration. Together, these results demonstrate a novel role for BAF53b in cocaine-associated memory formation and synaptic plasticity in the NAc.

Although histone modification and nucleosome remodelling can work in a coordinated manner to regulate gene expression and the role of histone acetylation and methylation have been shown to have a critical role in cocaine action, until now there was no direct evidence linking a specific nucleosome remodeller in cocaine-associated behaviours. One previous study implicated the ATPase subunit Brg1 as being associated with cocaine-induced gene expression changes in rodents5. More specifically, Brg1 was shown to physically interact with the cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) gene during chronic cocaine conditions5. This was an enticing demonstration that Brg1 and nucleosome remodelling may be involved in cocaine-induced regulation of gene expression. However, that study did not link changes in Brg1 association to changes in cocaine-associated behaviour. Furthermore, targeting the role of Brg1 in cocaine-associated behaviours is confounded by the role of Brg1 as the ATPase in several different nucleosome remodelling complexes that are found in multiple cell types19.

By targeting BAF53b, we circumvented several of these limitations that prevent elucidating the role of nucleosome remodelling in cocaine-associative memory formation. BAF53b is unique, because it is currently thought to be exclusively found in the nBAF nucleosome remodelling complex and is neuron specific22,25. Examining a homozygous deletion of BAF53b (Baf53b−/−) was not possible, as those mice die shortly after birth22. Cultured neurons from homozygous knockout mice display aberrant gene expression, synapse formation and activity-dependent dendritic arborization22. Therefore, we used two independently derived mouse lines that avoid the lethality associated with BAF53b/ knockout mice. Both heterozygous knockout (Baf53b+/−) and Baf53bΔHD transgenic mice appear indistinguishable from WT littermates in development, anxiety, locomotor activity and short-term memory23. To further account for unforeseen effects associated with having only one Baf53b allele (heterozygous knockout) throughout development, the Baf53bΔHD transgenic line expresses mutant BAF53b outside of BAF53b's known role in embryonic development.

Even though both mutant mouse lines displayed profound deficits in cocaine-associated memory formation, their responses to an increase in cocaine dose differed. Increasing the dose of cocaine from 5 to 10 mg kg−1 resulted in a continued CPP impairment in the Baf53bΔHD, but not the Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice. The lack of impairment in the Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout at 10 mg kg−1 was not predicted. In addition, both the Baf53bΔHD and Baf53b+/− heterozygous mice travelled similar distances to their respective WT littermates at the 10-mg kg−1 dose. This suggests that the differential CPP performance between both mutant mice at that dose is not due to a differential locomotor performance deficits induced by cocaine. Overall, these results suggested that there was likely to be underlying differences in neuronal function caused by their respective genetic manipulation. This result may reflect the differences between the powerful effects of overexpressing a deletion mutation of BAF53b (Baf53bΔHD) compared with the loss of one Baf53b allele. It is plausible that a deletion mutant of BAF53b ultimately affects the nBAF complex in a persistent manner such that even higher cocaine doses are unable to induce strong CPP. The hydrophobic domain is probably forming important protein–protein interactions, which are then disrupted in the transgenic Baf53bΔHD mice. However, this possibility remains open to further exploration.

To further elucidate the underlying mechanisms that might account for the differences observed between the Baf53bΔHD and Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout, we developed a theta stimulation protocol to induce long-term synaptic changes at glutamatergic synapses in NAc slices. Theta-driven wave patterns are a natural occurrence in the rodent and occur during learning in the hippocampus45 and NAc46. We found that both mutant lines showed normal LTP induction. However, the level of potentiation in slices from Baf53bΔHD mice was significantly reduced, whereas Baf53b+/− heterozygous knockout mice showed a slight attenuation in the level of LTP with respect to the WT group. In addition, these results also support the interpretation that the deletion mutation of BAF53b (Baf53bΔHD) leads to a significant LTP impairment compared with the heterozygous knockout and this profile was consistent with the cocaine dose–response differences observed between the two genetically modified mouse lines at 10 mg kg−1 in the CPP experiments.

BDNF is a neuromodulator released from terminals following TBS and supports LTP38,39,40,41,42. In addition, BDNF/TrkB signalling has been implicated in drug-context memory and drug-associated behaviours in the NAc46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53. Therefore, even though BDNF/TrkB signalling has an established role in theta-LTP (in the hippocampus41,54,55 and drug-associated memories (in the NAc)), there were open questions as to whether BDNF/TrkB receptor activation is required for synaptic plasticity in the NAc and capable of ameliorating LTP and CPP deficits induced by a BAF53b mutation. The current study determined that TrkB receptor activation is required for theta-LTP in the NAc using ANA12, a TrkB receptor antagonist43. We observed that infusions of ANA12 blocked theta-LTP in a reversible manner. Bath-applied BDNF generated a rapid increase in synaptic transmission in slices from both WT and Baf53bΔHD mice. This BDNF-induced increase in synaptic transmission was blocked by ANA12, indicating that BDNF effects were being modulated through the TrkB receptor.

On examining the effects of bath-applied human BDNF on both WT and mutant slices, we found that BDNF restored the ability of Baf53bΔHD slices to maintain a similar level of potentiation as found in WT slices. Given that WT slices did not display potentiation above that of Baf53bΔHD slices after bath BDNF application, we interpret this to mean that BDNF influence on the stabilization of LTP in the mutants probably involves events that are initiated after induction, which is consistent with our observation that short-term potentiation was unaffected in these mice. As described in an earlier report, BAF53b appears to be involved in activity-induced actin signalling in hippocampus CA1 pyramidal cells23. Additional morphological and cell signalling studies should reveal whether the same holds true for BAF53b in NAc neurons. Taken together, our results suggest that BDNF/TrkB receptor activation is integral to theta-LTP in the NAc and it is possible that there is a role for BAF53b in BDNF-related signalling cascades. The interaction between BAF53b and BDNF/TrkB signalling needs to be further explored; however, this effort is currently hampered by the unavailability of a chromatin immunoprecipitation-grade BAF53b antibody.

The successful rescue of LTP in slices from mutant mice using an acute application of human recombinant BDNF led us to explore a possible rescue of the CPP impairments in these mutant mice. To deliver a sustained amount of BDNF that could last over the course of a CPP experiment, we used an adeno-associated virus overexpressing human BDNF. Delivery of this virus into the striatum has previously been shown to ameliorate the cognitive deficits in a transgenic model of dementia, while rescuing motor deficits56. We pursued a rescue of the Baf53bΔHD mice, because they displayed the most severe LTP and CPP deficits. Our results showed that overexpressing BDNF in the NAc was sufficient to overcome CPP deficits in Baf53bΔHD mice. This result suggests that the deficits initially observed in Baf53bΔHD mice were not due to developmental confounds, because the Baf53bΔHD mice with overexpressing BDNF were capable of establishing a CPP.

Consistent with the behavioural data, viral overexpression of BDNF in Baf53bΔHD mice was able to restore theta-LTP to potentiated levels found in slices from WT+mCherry mice. Notably, the level of potentiation was dramatically increased following TBS in slices from WT+BDNF mice when compared with WT+mCherry mice. Furthermore, WT+BDNF group slice displayed potentiation significantly above that of the Baf53bΔHD+BDNF group. This result was not predicted as we observed that after bath application of BNDF, potentiation was comparable in slices taken from WT and mutant mice. This discrepancy in the level of LTP is possibly due to the differential effects of acute (bath applied) versus chronic (viral overexpressed) human BDNF exposure. That is, chronic elevations in BDNF, along with activity-dependent release of the neurotrophin, may have set in motion long-term plasticity changes in the NAc including an increase in dendritic spine density and in the number of synapses57,58,59 that would, on one hand, amplify long-term plasticity under normal conditions, whereas, on the other hand, normalize aberrant spines as to produce control levels of LTP. In contrast, the introduction of a brief infusion of BDNF in a NAc slice was enough to cause an immediate positive change in baseline synaptic function for both groups that then led to a saturation of theta-LTP in WT slices, while overcoming the LTP deficit in mutant slices. These results highlight the importance of evaluating the effect of BDNF/TrkB receptor activation on LTP using a variety of experimental approaches.

In summary, recent studies have implicated the BAF complex and its subunits in severe intellectual disability disorders and, more recently, the neuron-specific and dedicated subunit of the nBAF complex, BAF53b, has been shown to be critical for long-lasting forms of synaptic plasticity and long-term memory23. Considering the dynamic interplay between histone modification mechanisms, which have a key role in regulating gene expression induced by cocaine and other drugs of abuse, and nucleosome remodelling complexes, it is important to investigate the role of nucleosome remodelling complexes in cocaine-associated behaviours and memories. The present study extends the previous research by showing for the first time that neuron-specific nucleosome remodelling is critical for synaptic plasticity necessary for cocaine-associated memory formation and suggests studying neurotrophin receptors as a potential target to relieve BAF53b-associated deficits. Nucleosome remodelling complexes provide an additional layer of complexity to the epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene expression induced by drugs of abuse and potentially provide novel possibilities for therapeutic avenues.

Methods

Mice

For all experiments, mice of either sex were between 8 and 15 weeks old at the time of behavioural testing. Mice had free access to food and water, and lights were maintained on a 12:12 h light per dark cycle, with all behavioural testing performed during the light portion of the cycle. Experimenters were blinded to genotype during behavioural and electrophysiological experiments. In addition, mice were genotyped after testing using DNA from tail samples. All experiments were conducted according to US National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Animal Care and Use, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, Irvine.

Immunoprecipitation and western blotting

WT Baf53b and Baf53bΔHD were cloned into pLVX-EF1a-IRES-mCherry (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) creating plasmids MW95 and MW97, respectively. HT22 cells (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) were transfected with either the empty vector, pLVX-EF1a-IRES-mCherry, MW95 or MW97 using Lipofectamine LTX with Plus Reagent (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and lysed in TPER (ThermoFisher). Immunoprecipitations against Brg1 were performed using 1 μg of antibody ab70558 (Abcam,, Cambridge, MA). Western blottings were probed for BAF53b (75–311) at a 1:1,000 dilution (Neuromab, Davis, CA) and for Brg1 at a 1:1,000 dilution using the same antibody as above. Western blot images have been cropped for presentation. Full-size images are presented in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Immunofluorescence

WT mice were killed through cervical dislocation and their brains removed and frozen by immersion into isopentane cooled to ∼−50 °C on dry ice. Coronal sections were then cut at a thickness of 20 μm on a cryostat at the level corresponding to NAc (NAc; AP: +1.4 to +0.6 mm), thaw mounted on glass slides and stored at −20 °C until used for immunofluorescent staining. Immunofluorescence was carried out on the fresh–frozen, 20-μm thaw-mounted sections using the Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA) Plus system (Perkin Elmer, NEL704A001KT). In brief, all slides were fixed using ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde pH 7.4 (10 min), permeablized in 0.01% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS (5 min) and incubated in 2% hydrogen peroxide diluted in 0.1 M PBS (vol/vol) (15 min). Subsequently, all slides were then blocked (1 h) using the TSA blocking buffer and incubated overnight (4 °C) in rabbit antibody to BDNF (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-546), washed (3 × 5 min in 0.1 M PBS with 0.05% Tween-20, vol/vol) and incubated for 1 h at 21–23 °C with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antibody to rabbit IgG (1:500, 711-036-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch). Slides were again washed and the TSA reaction was performed to detect BDNF as described in the kit (TSA-Alexa Fluor 488 1:50). Slides were coverslipped in ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (P-36931, Invitrogen).

Quantitative real-time RT–PCR

Real-time RT–qPCR was performed to examine gene expression. Tissue was collected as described in our previous studies6,9. Tissue from the NAc was stored in RNALater (Invitrogen, AM7020) at −80 °C until processed. RNA was isolated using RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). Complementary DNA was made from 50 to 150 ng of total RNA using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Roche Applied Science, 04379012001). Primers were derived from the Roche Universal Probe Library. Gapdh: forward primers (5′–3′), ATGGTGAAGGTCGGTGTGA ; reverse primers (3′–5′), AATCTCCACTTTGCCACTGC ; Probe binding sequence (5′- TGGCCGTATTGG -3′). Baf53b wt: forward primers (5′–3′), TCCTGCCTTCTTCTTATGCAA ; reverse primers (3′–5′), CCTGTGGAGCGTCCATTT ; Probe binding sequence 100 (5′- GCTCACAG -3′). Baf53bΔHD: forward primers (5′–3′), GGTTTTCCTCATTAAAGGCATT ; reverse primers (3′–5′), TTCCAACCTATGGAAGTGATG ; Probe binding sequence 32 (5′- CTGCTCCC -3′). Gapdh probe is conjugated to Lightcycler Yellow555 and all other probes were conjugated to a reporter fluorophore. The non-overlapping dyes and quencher on the reference gene allow for multiplexing in the Roche LightCycle 480 II machine (Roche Applied Science). All values were normalized to Gapdh expression levels. Analysis and statistics were performed using the Roche proprietary algorithms and REST 2009 software based on the Pfaffl method.

Cocaine sensitization

This conditioning examines the locomotor activating effects of cocaine in animals due to acute or chronic cocaine administrations. In brief, before any behavioural procedure, mice were handled for 1–2 min for 3 days and were habituated to the activity apparatus (Plexiglas open field with sawdust bedding; base 16 cm × 32 cm) for 30 min per day for 2 consecutive days. Mutant mice and their respective WT littermates were randomized into three different treatment groups (Control, Acute and Chronic) and locomotor activity was monitored for 30 min after an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cocaine-HCl (10 mg kg−1; Sigma) or vehicle (0.9% saline). The Control group received saline injections on days 1–5. The Acute group received saline injections on days 1–4 and a single cocaine injection on day 5. The Chronic group received cocaine injections on days 1–5. Locomotor activity (total distance travelled) was recorded each day with a video camera mounted above the activity apparatus and tracked automatically from MPEG videos using EthoVision 3.1 software (Noldus Technology, Leesburg, VA; see ref. 6).

Conditioned place preference

Place conditioning was performed as described previously in our studies6,9. Briefly, all mice were handled for 1 min each day for 3 consecutive days before the experiment (days 1–3). Baseline preferences were assessed by placing the animals in the centre compartment of the three compartment place preference apparatus with the guillotine doors open, allowing free access to three distinct compartments for 15 min (day 4). Time spent in each compartment was recorded. Conditioning was conducted over the subsequent 4 days with the guillotine doors closed, thus confining animals to a specific compartment for 30 min (days 5–8). An unbiased paradigm was used such that half of the animals were injected with cocaine-HCl (5 or 10 mg kg−1, i.p.; Sigma) before placement in the checkered compartment and half were injected with cocaine before placement in the white compartment (CS+). The next day, mice were injected with 0.9% saline (1.0 ml kg−1, i.p.) before placement in the alternate compartment (CS−). Injections were alternated for subsequent conditioning sessions. Forty-eight hours after the last conditioning session, preference (15 min, Posttest 1; day 10) was assessed in all animals as described above in a drug-free state. CPP score was calculated as the time (s) spent in cocaine-paired (CS+) minus saline-paired (CS−) compartments. Time spent in each chamber of the CPP apparatus was tracked automatically from MPEG videos using EthoVision 3.1 software (Noldus Technology; see ref. 6).

Slice preparation and recording

Parasagittal slices containing the NAc core were prepared from BAF53b+/, CamKIIα-BAF53bHDLow and WT mice (∼2 months of age). Following isoflurane anaesthesia, mice were decapitated and the brain was quickly removed and submerged in ice-cold, oxygenated dissection medium containing (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.25 KH2PO4, 5 MgSO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3 and 10 glucose. The cerebellum and lateral aspects of both hemispheres were removed. Parasagittal slices (320 μm) were cut from the blocked brain using a FHC vibrating tissue slicer (Model:OTS-5000) before being transferred to an interface recording chamber containing preheated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) of the following composition (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.25 KH2PO4, 1.5 MgSO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 10 glucose and 10 μM picrotoxin to reduce feedforward inhibition (refs 56, 57, 58). Slices were continuously perfused with this solution at a rate of 1.0–1.5 ml min−1, while the surface of the slices were exposed to warm, humidified 95% O2/5% CO2 at 31±1 °C. Recordings began following at least 1.5 h of incubation.

Stimulation of glutamatergic afferent fibres within the NAc was achieved by placing a bipolar stainless steel stimulation electrode (25 μm diameter, FHC) just below the anterior commissure. Activation of fEPSPs were recorded using a glass pipette (2–3 MΩ) positioned caudal or caudal–ventral to the stimulation electrode (Fig. 4a). Thus, correct placement of electrodes within the NAc was confirmed by visual inspection of the slice and comparison with mouse brain atlas (Paxinos and Watson; 0.84–1.08 lateral to midline). Two parasagittal slices/hemisphere containing a large portion of the NAc core were obtained for each animal. Pulses were administered at 0.05 Hz using a current that elicited a 30–40% maximal response. Measurements of fEPSP slope (measured at 10–90% fall of the slope) were recorded during a minimum 20 min stable baseline period at which time LTP was induced by delivering three to five trains (intertrain interval of 1 min), each train containing five ‘theta' bursts, with each burst consisting of four pulses at 100 Hz and the bursts themselves separated by 200 ms (that is, TBS). The stimulation intensity was not increased during the delivery of TBS. Data were collected and digitized by NAC 2.0 Neurodata Acquisition System (Theta Burst Corp., Irvine, CA) and stored on a disk.

Data in the text are presented as means±s.d. Data in figures on LTP were normalized to the last 10 min of baseline. The LTP experiment and conventional measures of baseline synaptic transmission including paired-pulse facilitation and input/output curves were analysed using a two-way repeated measure analysis of variance.

Reagents

The AMPA receptor antagonist, DNQX (Tocris) and human recombinant form of BDNF (Chemicon) were prepared fresh in aCSF, whereas the TrkB receptor antagonist, ANA12 (Tocris), stock was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and then diluted to working concentration in aCSF (dimethyl sulfoxide <0.01%). BDNF virus (AAV2-CAG2-mCherry-2A-mBDNF-WPRE; AAV-253926) and control virus (AAV2-CAG2-mCherry-WPRE) were generous donations form Dr Mathew Blurton-Jones.

Data analysis

For all experiments, no differences were observed with respect to sex; thus, data sets were collapsed. Data sets were then analysed by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Bonferroni post-hoc tests were performed when appropriate. Specific comparisons were made using Student's t-tests with α-levels held at 0.05.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: White, A. O. et al. BDNF rescues BAF53b-dependent synaptic plasticity and cocaine-associated memory in the nucleus accumbens. Nat. Commun. 7:11725 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11725 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1 - 3

ncomms11725-s1.pdf (496KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Sarah White and Annie Vogel-Ciernia for critical feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (DA025922, DA036984 and MH101491 to M.A.W.), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (GM055246 supporting A.O.W. and A.J.L.), the Department of Education GAANN (P200A120165 supporting A.O.W. and A.J.L.), the US National Institute of Drug Abuse (F31DA038505 supporting A.O.W.) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) T32 grant (AG000096-31 supporting J.L.K.).

Footnotes

Author contributions A.O.W., E.A.K., D.P.M. and M.A.W. designed the experiments. A.O.W., E.A.K. and D.P.M. conducted the experiments and analysed the data. A.O.W. and M.A.W. wrote the manuscript. A.J.L., J.L.K., J.D., D.S., M.F.D. and Y.A. contributed to experiments. M.B.-J. designed the BDNF and control viruses.

References

  1. Hyman S. E. Addiction: a disease of learning and memory. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 1414–1422 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kalivas P. W., Szumlinski K. K. & Worley P. Homer2 gene deletion in mice produces a phenotype similar to chronic cocaine treated rats. Neurotox. Res. 6, 385–387 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shen H. Y. et al. Additive effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors and amphetamine on histone H4 acetylation, cAMP responsive element binding protein phosphorylation and DeltaFosB expression in the striatum and locomotor sensitization in mice. Neuroscience 157, 644–655 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Valjent E., Pagès C., Hervé D., Girault J. A. & Caboche J. Addictive and nonaddictive drugs induce distinct and specific patterns of ERK activation in mouse brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 1826–1836 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar A. et al. Chromatin remodeling is a key mechanism underlying cocaine-induced plasticity in striatum. Neuron 48, 303–314 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Malvaez M., Mhillaj E., Matheos D. P., Palmery M. & Wood M. A. CBP in the nucleus accumbens regulates cocaine-induced histone acetylation and is critical for cocaine- associated behaviors. J. Neurosci. 31, 16941–16948 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maze I. et al. Essentialrole of the histone methyltransferase G9a in cocaine-induced plasticity. Science 327, 213–216 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Renthal W. et al. Histone deacetylase 5 epigenetically controls behavioral adaptations to chronic emotional stimuli. Neuron 56, 517–529 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rogge G. A., Singh H., Dang R. & Wood M. A. HDAC3 is a negative regulator of cocaine-context-associated memory formation. J. Neurosci. 33, 6623–6632 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schroeder F. A. et al. Drug-induced activation of dopamine D(1) receptor signaling and inhibition of class I/II histone deacetylase induce chromatin remodeling in reward circuitry and modulate cocaine-related behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 2981–2992 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun J. et al. The effects of sodium butyrate, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, on the cocaine- and sucrose maintained self-administration in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 441, 72–76 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. White A. O. & Wood M. A. Does stress remove the HDAC brakes for the formation and persistence of long-term memory? Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 112, 61–67 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malvaez M., Barrett R. M., Wood M. A. & Sanchis-Segura C. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying extinction of memory and drug-seeking behavior. Mamm. Genome 20, 612–623 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rogge G. A. & Wood M. A. The role of histone acetylation in cocaine-induced neural plasticity andbehavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 94–110 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nestler E. J. Epigenetic mechanisms of drug addiction. Neuropharmacology 76, Pt B 259–268 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jonkman S. & Kenny P. J. Molecular, cellular, and structural mechanisms of cocaine addiction: a key role for microRNAs. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 198–211 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Romieu P. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease cocaine but not sucrose self-administration in rats. J. Neurosci. 28, 9342–9348 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kennedy P. J. et al. Class I HDAC inhibition blocks cocaine-induced plasticity by targeted changes in histone methylation. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 434–440 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hargreaves D. C. & Crabtree G. R. Genomics and Mechanisms pp 1–25Nature Publishing Group (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. Ho L. & Crabtree G. R. Chromatin remodeling during development. Nature 463, 474–484 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lessard J. et al. An essential switch in subunit composition of a chromatin remodeling complex during neural development. Neuron 55, 201–215 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu J. I. et al. Regulation of dendritic development by neuron-specific chromatin remodeling complexes. Neuron 56, 94–108 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vogel-Ciernia A. et al. The neuron-specific chromatin regulatory subunit BAF53b is necessary for synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 552–561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao K. et al. Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex to chromatin after T lymphocyte receptor signaling. Cell 95, 625–636 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Olave I., Wang W., Xue Y., Kuo A. & Crabtree G. R. Identification of a polymorphic, neuron-specific chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 16, 2509–2517 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Park J., Wood M. A. & Cole M. D. BAF53 forms distinct nuclear complexes and functions as a critical c-Myc-interacting nuclear cofactor for oncogenic transformation. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 1307–1316 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayford M. et al. Control of memory formation through regulated expression of a CaMKII transgene. Science 274, 1678–1683 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kojima N. et al. Rescuing impairment of long-term potentiation in fyn-deficient mice by introducing Fyn transgene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4761–4765 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Renthal W. et al. Genome-wide analysis of chromatin regulation by cocaine reveals a role for sirtuins. Neuron 62, 335–348 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kombian S. B. & Malenka R. C. Simultaneous LTP of non-NMDA—and LTD 55 of NMDA—receptor-mediated responses in the nucleus accumbens. Nature 368, 242–246 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomas M. J., Malenka R. C. & Bonci A. Modulation of long-term depression by dopamine in the mesolimbic system. J. Neurosci. 20, 5581–5586 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. d'Alcantara P., Ledent C., Swillens S. & Schiffmann S. N. Inactivation of adenosine A2A receptor impairs long-term potentiation in the accumbens nucleus without altering basal synaptic transmission. Neuroscience 107, 455–464 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schramm N. L., Egli R. E. & Winder D. G. LTP in the mouse nucleus accumbens is developmentally regulated. Synapse 45, 213–219 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mishra D., Zhang X. & Chergui K. Ethanol disrupts the mechanisms of induction of long-term potentiation in the mouse nucleus accumbens. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 36, 2117–2125 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Post R. M. & Kalivas P. Bipolar disorder and substance misuse: pathological and therapeutic implications of their comorbidity and cross-sensitisation. Br. J. Psychiatry 202, 172–176 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Russo S. J., Mazei-Robison M. S., Ables J. L. & Nestler E. J. Neurotrophic factors and structural plasticity in addiction. Neuropharmacology 56, (Suppl 1) 73–82 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Balkowiec A. & Katz D. M. Cellular mechanisms regulating activity-dependent release of native brain-derived neurotrophic factor from hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, 10399–10407 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Aicardi G. et al. Induction of long-term potentiation and depression is reflected by corresponding changes in secretion of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15788–15792 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Figurov A., Pozzo-Miller L. D., Olafsson P., Wang T. & Lu B. Regulation of synaptic responses to high-frequency stimulation and LTP by neurotrophins in the hippocampus. Nature 381, 706–709 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kramár E. A. et al. A novel mechanism for the facilitation of theta-induced long-term potentiation by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J. Neurosci. 24, 5151–5161 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Patterson S. L. et al. Recombinant BDNF rescues deficits in basal synaptic transmission and hippocampal LTP in BDNF knockout mice. Neuron 16, 1137–1145 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tyler W. J., Alonso M., Bramham C. R. & Pozzo-Miller L. D. From acquisition to consolidation: on the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in hippocampal-dependent learning. Learn. Mem. 9, 224–237 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cazorla M. et al. Identification of a low molecular weight TrkB antagonist with anxiolytic and antidepressant activity in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1846–1857 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jia Y., Gall C. M. & Lynch G. Presynaptic BDNF promotes postsynaptic long-term potentiation in the dorsal striatum. J. Neurosci. 30, 14440–14445 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Otto T., Eichenbaum H., Wiener S. I. & Wible C. G. Learning-related patterns of CA1 spike trains parallel stimulation parameters optimal for inducing hippocampal long-term potentiation. Hippocampus 1, 181–192 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Donnelly N. A. et al. Oscillatory activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens correlates with impulsivity and reward outcome. PLoS ONE 9, e111300 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bahi A., Boyer F., Chandrasekar V. & Dreyer J. L. Role of accumbens BDNF and TrkB in cocaine-induced psychomotor sensitization, conditioned-place preference, and reinstatement in rats. Psychopharmacology 199, 169–182 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Crooks K. R., Kleven D. T., Rodriguiz R. M., Wetsel W. C. & McNamara J. O. TrkB signaling is required for behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference induced by a single injection of cocaine. Neuropharmacology 58, 1067–1077 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Graham D. L. et al. Dynamic BDNF activity in nucleus accumbens with cocaine use increases self-administration and relapse. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1029–1037 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Graham D. L. et al. Tropomyosin-related kinase B in the mesolimbic dopamine system: region-specific effects on cocaine reward. Biol. Psychiatry 65, 696–701 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hall F. S., Drgonova J., Goeb M. & Uhl G. R. Reduced behavioral effects of cocaine in heterozygous brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 1485–1490 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Horger F. S., Drgonova J., Goeb M. & Uhl G. R. Reduced behavioral effects of cocaine in heterozygous brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 1485–1490 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lobo M. K. et al. Cell type-specific loss of BDNF signaling mimics optogenetic control of cocaine reward. Science 330, 385–390 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Korte M. et al. Virus-mediated gene transfer into hippocampal CA1 region restores long-term potentiation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor mutant mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12547–12552 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Korte M. et al. Hippocampal long-term potentiation is impaired in mice lacking brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8856–8860 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Goldberg N. R. et al. Neural stem cells rescue cognitive and motor dysfunction in a transgenic model of dementia with lewy bodies through a BDNF-dependent mechanism. Stem Cell Rep. 5, 791–804 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tyler W. J. & Pozzo-Miller L. D. BDNF enhances quantal neurotransmitter release and increases the number of docked vesicles at the active zones of hippocampal excitatory synapses. J. Neurosci. 21, 4249–4258 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tyler W. J. & Pozzo-Miller L. Miniature synaptic transmission and BDNF modulate dendritic spine growth and form in rat CA1 neurones. J. Physiol. 553, Pt 2 497–509 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kellner Y. et al. The BDNF effects on dendritic spines of mature hippocampal neurons depend on neuronal activity. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 6, 5 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1 - 3

ncomms11725-s1.pdf (496KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES