Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2016 May 10;7(3):e00281-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00281-16

Emerging Tuberculosis Pathogen Hijacks Social Communication Behavior in the Group-Living Banded Mongoose (Mungos mungo)

Kathleen A Alexander a,b,, Claire E Sanderson a,b, Michelle H Larsen c, Suelee Robbe-Austerman d, Mark C Williams e, Mitchell V Palmer f
PMCID: PMC4895101  PMID: 27165798

ABSTRACT

An emerging Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) pathogen, M. mungi, infects wild banded mongooses (Mungos mungo) in Northern Botswana, causing significant mortality. This MTC pathogen did not appear to be transmitted through a primary aerosol or oral route. We utilized histopathology, spoligotyping, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units-variable number of tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR), quantitative PCR (qPCR), and molecular markers (regions of difference [RDs] from various MTC members, including region of difference 1 [RD1] from M. bovis BCG [RD1BCG], M. microti [RD1mic], and M. pinnipedii [RD1seal], genes Rv1510 [RD4], Rv1970 [RD7], Rv3877/8 [RD1], and Rv3120 [RD12], insertion element IS1561, the 16S RNA gene, and gene Rv0577 [cfp32]), including the newly characterized mongoose-specific deletion in RD1 (RD1mon), in order to demonstrate the presence of M. mungi DNA in infected mongooses and investigate pathogen invasion and exposure mechanisms. M. mungi DNA was identified in 29% of nasal planum samples (n = 52), 56% of nasal rinses and swabs (n = 9), 53% of oral swabs (n = 19), 22% of urine samples (n = 23), 33% of anal gland tissue (n = 18), and 39% of anal gland secretions (n = 44). The occurrence of extremely low cycle threshold values obtained with qPCR in anal gland and nasal planum samples indicates that high levels of M. mungi can be found in these tissue types. Histological data were consistent with these results, suggesting that pathogen invasion occurs through breaks in the nasal planum and/or skin of the mongoose host, which are in frequent contact with anal gland secretions and urine during olfactory communication behavior. Lesions in the lung, when present, occurred only with disseminated disease. No environmental sources of M. mungi DNA could be found. We report primary environmental transmission of an MTC pathogen that occurs in association with social communication behavior.

IMPORTANCE

Organisms causing infectious disease evolve modes of transmission that exploit environmental and host conditions favoring pathogen spread and persistence. We report a novel mode of environmental infectious disease transmission that occurs in association with olfactory secretions (e.g., urine and anal gland secretions), allowing pathogen exposure to occur within and between social groups through intricate social communication behaviors of the banded mongoose host. The presence of M. mungi in these environmentally deposited secretions would effectively circumvent natural social barriers (e.g., territoriality), facilitating between-group pathogen transmission in the absence of direct physical contact, a rare occurrence in this highly territorial species. This work identifies an important potential mechanism of pathogen transmission of epidemiological significance in social species. We also provide evidence of a novel mechanism of pathogen transmission for the MTC complex, where pathogen movement in the environment and host exposure dynamics are driven by social behavior.

INTRODUCTION

The globally important tuberculosis (TB) pathogens of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) infect a wide range of wild and domestic animals, as well as humans, presenting a critical threat to both public and animal health (1). Pathogen transmission occurs largely through aerosol and/or oral exposure (reviewed in references 1 and 2) and can occur through direct contact or indirectly through an environmental pathway, the latter of which is a poorly understood aspect of TB epidemiology.

Increasing effort has been directed, however, at understanding how environmental transmission might contribute to MTC infection dynamics. This is particularly true for pathogens such as M. bovis, where cross-species transmission at the wildlife-livestock interface presents continued disease control challenges (3). Studies have documented the potential for viable MTC organisms to persist in the environment (M. bovis), in some instances for extended periods of time (46). In Michigan (United States), where there is supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), evidence suggests that contamination of feed via infected deer in these systems contributes to TB disease occurrence in cattle (4). This is consistent with experimental studies where calves exposed to feed used by M. bovis-infected white-tailed deer subsequently developed TB (7). TB infection dynamics among deer, pigs, and possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand may also be driven by ingestion of, or exposure to, M. bovis-infected carcasses found in the environment (8). In other detailed epidemiological studies, patterns of aggregation and behavior in wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Spain raise concerns that M. bovis environmental contamination may be contributing to observed infection dynamics between these species (9). In these systems, M. bovis DNA has been detected in the environment at water aggregation points, with the occurrence correlated with the size of the water hole and presence of cachectic animals utilizing the resource (10).

In host-pathogen systems where environmental transmission pathways occur, complex interacting factors will influence pathogen transmission, including host susceptibility, environmental pathogen persistence, infectiousness, and mechanism of host exposure (11), elements still largely unknown for many host species and MTC organisms. There is an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms and processes that influence MTC environmental transmission and persistence potential and the resultant disease control implications.

An emerging MTC pathogen, M. mungi, was identified in wild banded mongooses (Mungos mungo) in Northern Botswana (12, 13). This novel pathogen causes significant mortality in mongooses, threatening the persistence of smaller troops or groups. The organism was confirmed as a member of the MTC with the identification of the MPB70 target, IS6110 element, and 16S rRNA genes (12, 14, 15). Sequencing of the gyrB gene (encoding gyrase B) identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the M. tuberculosis complex member-specific sequence that placed M. mungi in the lineage 6 wildlife-associated group, suggesting that these organisms share a recent common ancestor (for full details, see references 12, 16, 17, and 18). The transmission pathway for this emerging MTC pathogen was previously unknown. Here, we report the discovery of a novel environmental mechanism of MTC pathogen exposure and transmission that occurs through olfactory behavior in association with anal gland secretions and urine used in scent marking in the group-living banded mongoose.

RESULTS

Histological presentation of M. mungi infection in banded mongooses.

We necropsied 155 mongooses from the study area from July 2000 to June 2015. Seventy-nine of these individuals were examined histologically. In M. mungi-infected mongooses, tuberculous lesions were found in various organs of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, lymphatic, urinary, and reproductive systems. Interestingly, lesions consistent with tuberculosis were found in 57% of nasal cavities examined (n = 35) and in 35% of cases where the skin of the nasal planum was examined (n = 34). In the nasal cavity, granulomatous infiltrates expanded the turbinate submucosa to various degrees, sometimes associated with mucosal erosions, ulcerations, and distortion of the nasal turbinates (Fig. 1A). Occasionally, granulomatous infiltrates extended into the hard palette. Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining revealed numbers of intralesional acid-fast bacilli; in some cases, a myriad of acid-fast bacilli accompanied extensive granulomatous infiltration (Fig. 1B). Externally, the nasal pathology is distinctive and has not been associated with any other condition (Fig. 2).

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Nasal turbinate from Mycobacterium mungi-infected banded mongoose. (A) Submucosa (SM) is markedly expanded by infiltrates of macrophages, with abundant foamy eosinophilic cytoplasm. Lesser numbers of lymphocytes are also present. Expanded submucosa is covered by intact, ciliated nasal mucosal epithelium (between arrows) (HE staining; magnification, ×10). (B) Submucosa contains numerous magenta acid-fast bacilli. (C) Cartilage (Zeihl-Neelsen staining; magnification, ×40).

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Mycobacterium mungi invasion occurs through injuries to the nasal planum and/or skin of banded mongooses. (A) Healthy adult mongooses. (B) Adult mongooses with advanced tuberculosis disease: tuberculosis lesions are found in the hairless parts of the mongoose nose (nasal planum and cavity), with granulomatous inflammation, erosion, and ulcerations, as well as distortion of the nasal cavity. M. mungi also appears to invade the mongoose host through skin lesions, often sites of previous injury. Pulmonary infection has only been detected in advanced (e.g., disseminated) disease.

Infiltrates of large numbers of macrophages and lesser numbers of lymphocytes also greatly expanded the dermis of the nasal planum. The overlying epidermis was sometimes ulcerated, with fibrin and low to moderate numbers of neutrophils associated with the ulcerated areas. In many cases, the epidermis was intact. Acid-fast bacteria were present in numbers among dermal infiltrates. Acid-fast bacilli were also seen in areas of intact epidermis and in small numbers among desquamated cells and debris on the epidermal surface, most commonly in small crevices or folds (Fig. 3).

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

Skin sample from Mycobacterium mungi-infected banded mongoose. Note magenta acid-fast bacilli in debris and desquamated epithelial cells on the surface of intact epidermis. Zeihl-Neelsen staining; magnification, ×40.

Lung lesions were identified in 67% of infected mongooses examined histologically (n = 33), macroscopically, and microscopically; pulmonary granulomas were seen only in advanced (i.e., disseminated) cases of disease. Microscopically, pulmonary lesions consisted of variably sized nodular infiltrates of macrophages, with lesser numbers of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and multinucleated giant cells. Central caseous necrosis was variably present, and perilesional fibrosis was minimal. Dystrophic mineralization within the necrotic caseum was not seen. Intralesional intracellular acid-fast bacilli were present in increasing numbers as disease became more advanced. Microscopically, the TB pneumonia was identified as hematogenous rather than bronchogenous (i.e., by inhalation), characterized by primary association of granulomas with vasculature and, less frequently, bronchi and bronchioles (Fig. 4).

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Lung tissue from Mycobacterium mungi-infected banded mongoose. Lung lesions are characterized by multifocal granulomas oriented around vasculature (long arrows) rather than airways (asterisk). Subpleural lesions expand the subpleural space and extend into the parenchyma (short arrows). HE staining; magnification, ×10.

Culture and isolation of M. mungi.

Initial attempts to characterize M. mungi involved the culture and isolation of the organism. However, in vitro growth of M. mungi was not achieved despite multiple attempts using a wide variety of tissues with visible tuberculous lesions, different incubation temperatures (28 ± 2°C and 37 ± 2°C), several different media and supplements, and different concentrations of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) during decontamination. Occasionally, atypical mycobacteria were recovered in media that were also MTC probe positive. The only colonies that were successfully recovered from solid media were M. intracellulare, despite a 16-week incubation of all solid media. However, M. Mungi-specific spoligotype and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number of tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) results were sporadically obtained when performed on DNA extracted from liquid medium cultures if DNA probes were signal positive.

Spoligotype, MIRU-VNTR, and RD1 analyses.

All M. mungi-infected samples that were successfully spoligotyped had a unique spoligotype (SB1960) (Fig. 5) (n = 10 mongooses in this study and previously [12]), according to both the SpolDB4 (19) and the M. bovis-specific spoligotype databases (http://www.Mbovis.org). This unique M. mungi spoligotype has been identified in infected mongooses over several years (2000 to 2009) and across troops (n = 6 troops). The full set of 24 MIRU-VNTR loci (20) also identified unique patterns specific for M. mungi compared to the MIRU-VNTR patterns of other MTC organisms in the international database (http://www.miru-vntrplus.org) (12). In this study, we were able to obtain complete 24-locus MIRU-VNTR (MIRU-VNTR 24) patterns in three animals (n = 4 samples) collected in 2009, 2011, and 2013, and partial profiles in an additional 11 animals (n = 19 samples; see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). The dominant pattern was 235324243821 33316354323b, with locus VNTR 2401 varying between 4 and 5. In addition to a distinctive spoligotype and MIRU-VNTR pattern, an MTC-specific multiplex PCR can be used to differentiate M. mungi from other members of the MTC, with the exception of M. africanum (Fig. 6; Table 1) (12, 16, 17, 21, 22). M. mungi is distinguished from M. africanum by a positive result for the molecular markers region of difference 1 (RD1) from M. pinnipedii (RD1seal) and RD1 with a mongoose-specific deletion (RD1mon) (Table 1). The RD1mon deletion provides the specific molecular marker for M. mungi that differentiates it from all other members of the MTC. This deletion is smaller than that found in dassie bacillus and M. suricattae (RD1das/RD1sur) (Fig. 7). From sequence data, the 3′ end of the RD1mon deletion is similar to the RD1das deletion, but the 5′ end of the RD1mon deletion is located further upstream of the RD1das deletion (GenBank accession number 1910160). PPE68 (Rv3873), the gene immediately upstream from esxA and esxB, is present in dassie bacillus and M. suricattae but is missing, in part, in M. mungi.

FIG 5 .

FIG 5 

Spoligotype analysis of the emerging pathogen Mycobacterium mungi and representative M. tuberculosis complex organisms. The unique spoligotype of M. mungi (672600000000671) is identified in tissues of infected banded mongooses BM10109 and BM9209; MTC typing panel results are also shown in Fig. 6, and external lesions of M. mungi infection in mongoose BM10109 are shown in Fig. 2 (bottom right, see facial and leg lesions). Clinical diagnostic cases are included for comparison: the M. bovis isolate (264073777777600) was recovered from a cow, and the M. tuberculosis isolate (777777777760751) from a nonhuman primate. Strains H36Rv and BCG are used as controls.

FIG 6 .

FIG 6 

Mycobacterium mungi evaluation with an M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) typing panel. M. mungi can be distinguished from other MTC organisms by the presence or absence of PCR amplicons. M. mungi and M. africanum present with a similar pattern on this panel, as would the other lineage 6 members, dassie bacillus and M. suricattae. However, M. mungi can be differentiated from these MTC members by the presence of a unique deletion in region of difference 1 (RD1mon; see Table 2).

TABLE 1 .

Assessment of genomic regions of difference in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex membersa

graphic file with name mbo0031628220011.jpg
a

Samples were screened for the presence or absence of these RDs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] or deletions) using PCR-based typing for the specific identification of Mycobacterium mungi (12, 18, 21). The full sample set was then screened with a subset of these molecular markers (black box: RD1BCG, RD1mic, RD1seal, and RD1mon). These molecular markers allow the identification of any M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) organisms circulating in the population, as well as the presence of closely related members of the wildlife-associated lineage 6. A positive result on RD1mon distinguishes M. mungi (red box) from all other MTC organisms. Identifications are based upon the presence of (+) or a failure to amplify (−) a PCR fragment of the expected size. RDs, regions of difference; BCG, bacille Calmette-Guérin (M. bovis BCG); ND, no data.

FIG 7 .

FIG 7 

Schematic of region of difference 1 (RD1) in Mycobacterium mungi and other organisms.

Detection of M. mungi DNA in mongoose tissue and secretions.

As direct culture of M. mungi has been unsuccessful to date, we used specific molecular markers to identify the presence of DNA from any MTC organism and differentiate between lineage 6 organisms (M. africanum, dassie bacillus, and M. suricattae), as well as definitively identify M. mungi (Table 1). M. mungi DNA was identified in the anal glands and anal gland secretions in a large number of individuals (33% and 39%, respectively). Positive samples were only detected in ill mongooses, where the health status was known (Table 2). There were no differences in pathogen prevalence between anal gland tissue and secretions (P = 0.694, χ2 = 0.153). M. mungi was also identified in urine samples (22%), with 60% coming from clinically ill individuals. Respiratory secretions were positive for M. mungi DNA, consistent with histological findings of tuberculosis lesions and pathogen DNA being found in the hairless part of the mongoose nose (Table 2).

TABLE 2 .

Assessment of Mycobacterium mungi infection in banded mongooses

Sample type (yr[s] of sample collection) Results for M. mungi detection bya:
PCRb
Histopathology
% positive No. of samples tested % of positive samples in agreement with necropsy result (no. positive by necropsy) % positive No. of samples tested
Anal glands (2009–2015) 33 18 100 c
Anal gland secretions (2009–2015) 39 44 100 (5)
Oral swabs (2009–2015) 53 19 100 (3)
Nasal swabs (2009–2015) 50 4 100 (1)
Nasal rinses (2015) 60 5 Status unknown
Urine (2011–2015) 22 23 60 NAd
Nasal planum (2000–2015) 29 52 69 35 34
Skin lesions (2003–2015) 100 7 100 (5) 56 9
Scrotum (2015) 100 2 100
Testicular lesions (2000–2008) 50 12
Lung (all disseminated disease) (2000–2012) 67 33
Bladder (2009–2015) 43 23 70 0 12
Kidney (2000–2012) 24 34
Feces (2013–2014) 0 113 NA
Other species feces (see text) (2013) 0 121 NA
Human feces in the environment (2012–2013) 0 12 NA
Soil from infected mongoose home ranges (2011 and 2014) 0 172 NA
a

The prevalence of positive tissue samples is presented by assessment type and, of those positive, the percentage that came from individuals determined to be positive for M. mungi infection at necropsy.

b

In PCR, samples were considered positive if primer sets for RD1BCG, RD1mic, RD1seal, and RD1mon amplified a PCR fragment of the expected size.

c

—, samples were not evaluated using the indicated diagnostic technique.

d

NA, Technique not used with this sample type.

M. mungi-specific DNA was detected in the nasal planum (29%, n = 52) and skin lesions (100%, n = 7) (Table 2). Among mongooses positive for M. mungi DNA in the nasal planum, 69% of these samples were collected from clinically ill individuals, where status could be determined. M. mungi DNA was also identified in the scrotal sac (only two samples, both diseased) and testicles (50%, n = 12). In these diseased animals with positive scrotal sacs, infection in the nasal planum tissue could not be identified.

Quantitative PCR assessment of M. mungi DNA in mongoose tissues and secretions.

Eighty-six tissue and secretion samples from 43 animals were tested with the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) qPCR assay for the IS6110-2 insertion region (23). A total of 52 tissues were positive, 27 negative, and seven inhibited (n = 86) (Table 3). The average cycle threshold (CT) values were lowest in the lung (26.93), liver (27.38), and nose (28.49; range, 23.76 to 35.6) and highest in the anal gland (31.93; range, 22.22 to 35.48) and anal gland secretions (35.45). The CT values found in M. bovis-infected cattle tissues detected at NVSL in 2015 had an average of 28.5 and a range of 22.28 to 35.53. The occurrence of extremely low CT values in anal gland (e.g., 22.22) and nasal planum (e.g., 23.76) samples indicates that the bacterial burden can be high in these tissue types.

TABLE 3 .

Quantitative PCR results from banded mongoose tissue samples submitted to the National Veterinary Services Laboratories

Sample type No. of samples tested No. with valid results CT values (range) % positive Avg no. of CT positive samples (SD)
Anal gland 8 6 22.22–35.48 83 31.93 (5.55)
Anal gland secretions 19 18 35.35–38.68 17 36.53 (1.87)
Bladder 9 9 30.22–34.17 33 32.03 (1.99)
Liver 9a 6 19.25–35.5 100 27.38 (6.67)
Lung 10 10 18.4–34.53 90 26.93 (5.76)
Nose/nasal planum 14a 14 23.76–35.6 71 28.46 (3.87)
Skin lesion 3 3 22.77–36.48 100 30.17 (6.92)
Spleen 10 9 25.81–35.42 100 31.16 (3.56)
Kidney 2 2 23.52–35.07 100 29.30 (8.17)
Otherb 2 2 50 20.81
Total 86 79 18.4–38.68 66 29.53 (5.23)
a

The number of samples tested includes a duplicate from a single animal.

b

Other samples included a foot lesion (negative) and exudate/pus.

Assessment of M. mungi DNA in other potential sources of environmental exposure.

We examined other possible sources of M. mungi exposure, including soil (within and around dens), sewage, and mongoose feces (Fig. 8; Table 2). We also conducted a stratified survey through multiple home ranges of infected banded mongoose groups, collecting feces from various wild and domestic animals that were present in the transect and fit the selection criteria. Samples comprised 16 different species (n = 172 total), including African elephant (Loxodonta africana, n = 35), impala (Aepyceros melampus, n = 20), warthog (Phacochoerus africanus, n = 19), hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibious, n = 9), waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus, n = 6), domestic cow (n = 6), chacma baboon (n = 6), Cape buffalo (Syncerus caffer, n = 5), Chobe bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus roualeyni, n = 5), Southern African porcupine (Hystrix africaeaustralis, n = 4), bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis, n = 1), African civet (Civettictis civetta, n = 1), helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris, n = 1), greater kudu (n = 1), lion (Panthera leo, n = 1), and vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus, n = 1). We did not, however, identify the presence of M. mungi DNA from any of these sample types. Despite two decades of necropsy surveillance of wildlife and domestic animals in the Chobe region by the lead author, evidence of TB has not been identified in any species other than the banded mongoose (n = 46 mammalian species and n = 310 necropsies where records were maintained, representing a subset of all cases necropsied, some of which were histologically evaluated, from 1995 to 2015).

FIG 8 .

FIG 8 

Environmental sampling sites in the home range of infected banded mongooses. The study site is within the black box on the map of Botswana (inset).

DISCUSSION

This study identifies the occurrence of a novel mechanism of MTC pathogen transmission that involves environmental transmission pathways, identifying important implications for MTC pathogen transmission risk at the wildlife-environment-domestic animal interface. Macro- and microhistological and molecular genetic assessments identify that this organism is environmentally transmitted, primarily invading the mongoose host through the nasal planum and cavity and through the skin (Fig. 1 and 3), with lesions in the lung found only in advanced (e.g., disseminated) disease (12, 17). Despite extensive environmental sampling, we could only identify the presence of M. mungi DNA in banded mongoose tissues and secretions. The CT values detected in nose and anal gland tissue from mongooses were comparable to the CT values found in tuberculous tissue from the lung and lymph nodes of other host species infected with M. bovis or M. tuberculosis, suggesting similar tissue colonization of M. mungi as with other MTC pathogens. It is important to note this is the first MTC organism identified that is unable to grow in vitro using currently known methods. This was further supported by our inability to obtain complete MIRU-VNTR 24 sets from liquid culture. However, we successfully obtained them directly from tissue if CT values were below 21.

Where infection status could be determined, M. mungi DNA was detected only in the respiratory and anal gland tissues and in secretions of clinically ill mongooses, suggesting that pathogen shedding may be less frequent in mongooses with inapparent infection (the duration of which is uncertain). However, positive urine samples were collected from apparently healthy animals. While this may have important implications for the epidemiological dynamics of the system, further sampling will be needed to confirm these patterns.

While the lesion pattern and mechanism of transmission of M. mungi are distinct from those of other members of the MTC, natural infection and lesion formation in the skin, including occasional facial lesions, have been reported in other wildlife species infected with nontuberculous mycobacteria, including red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) infected with M. lepromatosis (24) and common ringtail (Pseudocheirus peregrinus), mountain brushtail (Trichosurus cunningham), and common brushtail (Trichosurus vulpecula) possums infected with M. ulcerans (25).

M. mungi has a unique deletion in the RD1 region (RD1mon), a genomic locus known to be involved in virulence and prone to deletions in other members of the MTC, such as M. microti (RD1mic), M. suricattae, dassie bacillus (RD1das), and M. bovis BCG (RD1BCG) (16, 2628). As reported previously, the RD1mon deletion has different deletion junctions than the RD1das deletion (12). The RD1mon deletion is relatively small (1,610 bp) compared to those of RD1das/RD1sur (4,132 bp), RD1BCG (9,456 bp), and RD1mic (14,120 bp) (Fig. 7). RD1mon may represent a minimal deletion of the RD1 region and shows that deletion of esxB and esxA is common to RD1 deletions from a range of MTC organisms. Characterization of this region indicates that PPE68 (Rv3873), the gene immediately upstream from esxB and esxA and present in dassie bacillus and M. suricattae, is missing in part in M. mungi. PPE68 is expressed in an operon with PE35. Both genes have been implicated in the interaction between the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin 10 (IL-10) and the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in human macrophages, influencing the establishment and persistence of infection. Recent work suggests that the PE35-PPE68 interaction may modulate granuloma formation, a key element for host control of mycobacterial infections (29). This may have important implications for the immunopathology of M. mungi in the mongoose host.

Pathogen transmission and olfactory behavior.

As with other mammalian species, banded mongooses use anal gland secretions and urine to provide critical olfactory messages to conspecifics within and between social groups (3033). The presence of M. mungi in these olfactory secretions effectively allows the pathogen to hijack mongoose communication pathways. As signals, infectious secretions can both attract and expose mongooses to M. mungi infection within and between social groups. Additionally, with a hydrophobic cell envelope (34), M. mungi would be ideally adapted to the high-lipid environment of the anal gland (31). Within this lipid environment, M. mungi might have some level of protection from the host’s immune system and, potentially, from desiccation once deposited in the environment or on other mongooses. M. mungi could then be transmitted through potentially nonrandom social behaviors, such as (i) scent inspection (i.e., sniffing and contact with the nasal planum and passages), (ii) autogrooming or allogrooming in areas scent marked by infectious anal gland secretions, (iii) scent marking directly where injuries occur (i.e., through skin lesions), and (iv) overmarking on infectious anal gland secretions and contaminating injuries on the ventral/caudal aspect of the mongoose (e.g., the scrotum) (Fig. 9). This represents a novel mechanism of pathogen exposure (e.g., anal gland secretions used in scent marking) and pathogen invasion (e.g., anal gland scent investigation, marking injuries, and overmarking) (Fig. 9).

FIG 9 .

FIG 9 

Mycobacterium mungi can infect the banded mongoose host through anal gland secretions and urine used in social communication behavior. (A) Banded mongooses can be injured through behavioral interactions with conspecifics, other vertebrate and invertebrate organisms, as well as injuries from the physical environment. (B) Contact with infected anal gland secretions through communication behavior allows the pathogen to invade the mongoose host through these injuries and pathogen transmission to occur between and within social groups, overcoming social barriers to transmission. (C) Pathogen invasion results in tuberculosis disease that causes high levels of mortality among banded mongooses, threatening smaller groups with extirpation (second and third photographs, mongoose BM10109; see Fig. 5 for spoligotype results and Fig. 6 for MTC typing panel results).

Banded mongooses and M. mungi transmission: pathogen evolution and ecology.

The manner in which M. mungi invades, and is transmitted between mongoose hosts, spurs intriguing questions regarding TB ecology and the potential for evolution of transmission strategies that might have implications for other environmentally transmitted pathogens. Transmission of MTC pathogens typically requires close and prolonged physical contact between individuals, with respiratory (aerosol) transmission being an important mode of pathogen spread in TB maintenance hosts (e.g., humans, badgers, buffalo, and meerkats) (3537). Transmission can also occur through oral exposure or percutaneous mechanisms (biting conspecifics) (35, 37). As a highly social and fossorial species, banded mongooses live in close and prolonged physical contact with members of their social group, particularly when the troop dens in small and enclosed environments. These life history attributes would appear to favor aerosol transmission of M. mungi, yet this is not the primary transmission mode of this pathogen in banded mongooses. The answer may be related to aspects of banded mongoose behavioral ecology. This species differs importantly from other TB maintenance hosts in that they are communal breeders, have a low-skew reproductive strategy (reproduction is distributed more equally among group members) (38), and exhibit a low level of extragroup mating and a lack of dispersal between groups (39). In a study conducted in Uganda from 1994 to 2001 where group history was known, no unrelated individuals emigrated into an established group during the entire study period, and females that reproduced did not have access to unrelated males (40). Additionally, in our study population, TB appears to influence dispersal directly, where clinically diseased and/or injured mongooses (injury leading significantly to TB disease) are less likely to disperse than clinically healthy conspecifics (41). While it is uncertain whether the evolution of pathogen transmission strategies in M. mungi has been responsive to these life history attributes, it is clear that transmission through scent marking behavior circumvents important social barriers that might normally impede pathogen transmission and spread across mongoose social groups and the population. Evolution of pathogen transmission potential has been seen in other host-pathogen systems in the MTC. For example, recent work suggests that mutations in the PhoPR regulator system have influenced virulence and transmission potential in humans among animal-adapted strains of the MTC, such as M. bovis and lineage 6 member M. africanum, explaining limited human-to-human transmission after a spillover event (42).

For the banded mongoose, infection with M. mungi appears to threaten group persistence of smaller troops, with larger troops remaining generally unaffected. The long-term conservation impacts are uncertain, but infection appears to be more important in mongoose populations experiencing other sources of mortality, such as car strikes and dog attacks, that depress group size.

The data suggest that the banded mongoose is likely the definitive host and reservoir for M. mungi, with pathogen transmission arising from conspecifics rather than spillover from an environmental or mammalian host reservoir. The only known population of M. mungi-infected banded mongooses occurs in Northern Botswana and northwest Zimbabwe (Fig. 10). No range overlap is identified between this population of mongooses and host species infected with closely related MTC pathogens: the rock hyrax (Procavia capensis, infected by dassie bacillus) and meerkat (Suricata suricatta, infected by M. suricattae) (Fig. 10). Interestingly, of the remaining lineage 6 members, M. africanum and the newly discovered chimp bacillus have only been found in West Africa (17).

FIG 10 .

FIG 10 

Range overlap for known reservoir hosts of lineage 6 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) organisms most closely related to M. mungi. The only known populations of M. mungi-infected banded mongoose occur in Northern Botswana and northwest Zimbabwe. The banded mongoose range distribution overlaps areas with other MTC lineage 6 reservoir hosts—the rock hyrax, Procavia capensis (dassie bacillus), and meerkat, Suricata suricatta (Mycobacterium suricattae). In areas where M. mungi-infected populations of banded mongoose have been identified (dashed line), no range overlap with these species or any other known wildlife or domestic animal reservoirs of tuberculosis occurs. Distribution data were obtained from references 58 to 60).

Patterns of MTC pathogen transmission in other species.

In addition to aerosol transmission, M. bovis in the badger is believed to be transmitted through bites from individuals who have pulmonary disease, where contamination of the saliva results in bite injection (43). Similar clinical findings and assumptions have been made for meerkats infected with the MTC pathogen M. suricattae (44). These host species share many behavioral characteristics with the mongoose host. Both species are social and territorial and engage in complex anal gland scent marking behavior (45). Our findings suggest that pathogen transmission through scent marking should be investigated in these and other social species, particularly where pathogen transmission and infectious disease dynamics may be incompletely understood.

Epidemiological significance: environmental transmission.

Theoretical studies find that infectious disease outbreaks involving environmental reservoirs will produce epidemic or endemic disease depending on (i) the minimum fraction of infected individuals, (ii) the minimum size of fluctuation of in-reservoir pathogens (including the nature of pathogen decay), and (iii) the shedding rate of infected individuals, also termed the pathogen enhancement ratio (46). Compartmental modeling approaches (iSIR) that incorporate in-reservoir dynamics have been applied to such systems, but important assumptions are often made; for example, assumptions regarding homogeneity in reservoir contact and pathogen shedding rates among individuals (46). In this host-pathogen system, not only does transmission through anal gland secretions and urine allow exposure without direct host contact but the secretion is also used by the mongoose host as a signal designed to directly attract other mongooses for communication purposes. These elements can facilitate pathogen exposure and secondary transmission over expected values, ultimately increasing the basic reproductive rate of the pathogen (R0)—a measure of outbreak severity (47). Future work is needed to refine our understanding of these dynamics, including how heterogeneities in individual scent marking behavior and pathogen shedding drive disease transmission. These host-pathogen dynamics may have important consequences for epidemic behavior and present new challenges for computational characterization of these systems, particularly when environmental pathogen transmission can be influenced by the dynamics of social behavior.

Conclusions.

We identify the occurrence of a novel environmental transmission pathway for the newly emerging TB pathogen M. mungi. This organism is transmitted through environmentally deposited olfactory secretions, a transmission dynamic that may occur in other species, warranting further investigation in those systems. The presence of M. mungi in olfactory secretions effectively circumvents natural social barriers (e.g., territoriality) to pathogen transmission, potentially increasing between-group pathogen transmission in the absence of direct physical contact between infected and susceptible hosts. This has critical implications for TB outbreak potential among wildlife and domestic animals, increasing transmission opportunities across the landscape. Our work identifies environmental transmission of an MTC pathogen, highlighting the array of complex interdependent factors that may influence this route of transmission and the associated outbreak dynamics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mongoose sampling.

Banded mongoose study troops (n = 8) were intensively monitored from 2000 to 2004 and from 2008 to 2015, with one or two animals radio-collared in each troop. Samples were collected antemortem from animals captured in association with radio-collaring activities and postmortem from mongoose carcasses opportunistically found in our study area during this same period (hit by car, attacked by dogs, killed by wildlife management officers, etc.). We screened anal gland tissue (postmortem only), anal gland secretions, and urine samples from mongooses from these infected study troops. To minimize pain and distress during capture procedures, we used an analgesic sedative at a dose that provides anesthesia and analgesia (1 to 1.4 mg of medetomidine and the reversal agent, atipamazole, 1:1 reversal agent volume). Animals were sampled and collared in less than 20 min, with administration of the reversal agent leading to the full recovery of an individual within 5 min. Animals were able to join their respective troop in less than 40 min with minimized disturbance to the individual and group.

To collect anal gland samples from anesthetized mongooses, animals were placed in dorsal recumbency and anal glands were digitally palpated and, once located, manually expressed into a sterile tube. Antemortem, urine was collected by placing a sterilized rubber mat in close proximity to a study mongoose troop. Once an individual mongoose urinated on the mat while investigating, the sample was collected using a transfer pipette and placed into a sterile 1.5-ml tube. The mat was cleaned with 10% bleach and sterilized water in between sample collections. Nasal and oral swabs were collected antemortem from anesthetized animals, as well as during postmortem examinations. A sterile swab was gently run over nasal or oral surfaces and then placed in a sterile 1.5-ml tube. More recently, we have moved to nasal rinses, where sterile saline is flushed into the nasal cavity and collected into a sterile tube. Mongoose fecal samples were collected from six infected troops following morning latrine behavior as previously described (48). Each morning upon leaving their den, banded mongooses will defecate individually during the same time period and in the same general location (referred to as a latrine), making it possible to collect fecal samples from individual mongooses in each troop without replication during that latrine event.

All animal handling and sampling activities in this study were conducted under approval from the Virginia Tech Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC 13-164-FIW), as well as the Botswana Ministry of Environment, Wildlife and Tourism (EWT 8/36/4 XXVI) (24).

Animals were classified as having TB if an experienced prospector identified macroscopic lesions consistent with TB at necropsy (i.e., variably sized, grayish to white, nodular lesions on any organ). The majority of these cases were later confirmed by histopathology and/or PCR (n = 105). Clinical signs of M. mungi infection include anorexia to cachexia, hunched body posture, matted fur, epiphora, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal enlargement, deviation of the nasal septum, drooping and/or enlarged testicles, lethargy, lagging behind the group, and fearlessness. The clinical and gross pathological presentation of M. mungi (early to late stage) is very distinctive and has not been associated with any other disease syndrome in the mongoose host over the last 15 years of research (12). A syndromic approach to observational health classification has been employed previously where a visible and specific clinical presentation is predictive of pathogen infection (e.g., Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in house finches, Carpodacus mexicanus [49]).

Environmental sample collection.

Samples from wildlife and domestic animal feces, soil, and sewage were collected along foot transects in the home range of infected banded mongoose study troops across protected and unprotected areas (Fig. 8). Environmental sampling was opportunistic and did not involve the capture or handling of any live animals or engage human subjects.

Fecal and sewage samples were collected three times in July, August, and September of 2011, as previously described (50). Briefly, 55 stratified transect points were identified, 100 m in length, perpendicular to the river, spaced at 500 m intervals along the Chobe River, which traverses the study area and the ranges of infected mongoose troops that live in the area. Sampling started at the confluence of the Chobe and Zambezi Rivers (transect 1, −17°47′39.9114″, 25°15′38.5554″) and extended 27.5 km upstream, into the Chobe National Park (transect 55, −17°49′55.4154″, 25°2′53.0874″). Using aseptic techniques, a sample was taken from the center of the fecal ball using a sterile tongue depressor and collected in a sterile 50 ml conical tube. Feces that could not be reliably identified due to disruption and poor surface type (failed spoor or foot print detection) or were older than 24 h (as determined by an experienced wildlife tracker), were excluded from the study. Complete sampling (transects 1 to 55) took approximately 5 days. Sampling was conducted three times at one month intervals during the sampling period. Soil samples were collected along the same transects from June to July of 2014. Samples were collected at the beginning, middle, and end point of each transect, at the surface and 4 inches below the surface. Samples were also collected in and around den sites.

Histology.

During necropsies, samples of all major organs, as well as all of the lymph nodes (marked separately for identification: submandibular, prescapular, popliteal, hilar, and mesenteric), were collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histological examination. All macroscopically visible lesions were also sampled. Formalin-fixed tissue sections were prepared using routine techniques and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Ziehl-Neelsen staining was used to visualize acid-fast bacilli.

Culture and isolation.

Tissue samples, including spleen, liver, submandibular lymph nodes, and skin from diseased animals, were homogenized in phenol red broth, decontaminated with various concentrations (0.7 to 2%) of NaOH for 7 to 10 min, and neutralized back to a pH of approximately 7 based on phenol red color indicator, using 6 N HCl (51, 52). After centrifugation at 4,600 × g, the sediments were inoculated into standard Bactec MGIT tubes (Becton, Dickinson, Sparks, MD) using in-house 7H9 broth and the following solid media: 7H10 medium supplemented with glycerol or pyruvate, Stonebrink medium, Lowenstein-Jensen medium, 7H11 medium supplemented with egg yolk and mycobactin J, and 7H100 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum, 5% hemolyzed blood, malachite green, and pyruvate. Additional MGIT tubes were also supplemented with hemin and NAD strips (BBL strips; Becton, Dickinson). Skin and nasal tissue sediments were incubated at both 28°C and 37°C, while internal organ tissues were incubated at 37°C. MGIT medium was incubated for 49 days, and solid medium tubes were read weekly for the first 8 weeks and then held for a final read at 16 weeks. Commercial DNA probes (Hologic, San Diego, CA) were used to identify MTC organisms in signal-positive MGIT tubes.

MTC differential PCR, spoligotyping, and MIRU-VNTR analyses.

DNA for molecular testing was extracted from liquid medium after incubation. Briefly, 500 µl of the liquid medium was placed in Tris-EDTA and phenol-chloroform and bead disrupted, and the aqueous layer purified by ethanol precipitation. The TB species differential PCR was performed as previously published, amplifying each primer separately and then visualizing the products on an agarose gel (53). The same extracted DNA was also subjected to spoligotyping by amplifying the spacer regions using PCR and visualizing their presence/absence using the Southern blotting technique (54). The MIRU-VNTR 24 was also performed on DNA by multiplexing primers for three loci in eight PCRs and then conducting fragment analysis on an ABI 3500XL instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (20).

Direct tissue qPCR.

Lesioned tissue was weighed, placed in a bead disruption tube with Tris-EDTA and DNA extraction control 670 (DEC670) (Bioline, London, United Kingdom), and heat inactivated. After bead disruption, the DNA was isolated with phenol-chloroform and purified by mixing the aqueous layer with 1.2 ml DNA binding buffer (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), loading onto a Zymo-Spin I-96 plate (deep well) (Zymo Research), rinsing with buffers, and eluting with 100 µl buffer. Five microliters of the purified DNA was used in a quantitative real-time PCR with IS6110-2 primers (forward, 3′-ACACATCGATCCGGTTCAGC-5′; reverse, 3′-TCGTCTCGGCTAGTGCATTG-5′; and probe, 3′-TCGGTCGGAGCGGTCGGAAG-5′) (23).

Tissue, secretions, and environmental source sample screening.

DNA from all mongoose tissues and anal gland secretions was extracted using the protocol for Gram-positive bacteria in the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), modified to include a chemical lysis pretreatment step. DNA from urine was extracted using the Norgen BioTek urine DNA isolation kit for exfoliated cells or bacteria (Norgen Biotek Corp., Ontario, Canada) with a similar pretreatment step. DNA was extracted from environmental samples using the Power fecal DNA isolation kit and the Power soil DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc.) after the pretreatment step.

For characterization of RD1mon, primers were designed to target the flanking region to amplify the mongoose-specific deletion. Products were sequenced to determine the extent of the deletion and refine RD1 primer sets to be used for detection of M. mungi in this study.

To confirm M. mungi-specific DNA in a sample, extracted DNA was screened for the presence or absence of RDs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNP] or deletions) using PCRs that allowed the identification of M. mungi DNA (Table 1, primer sets for amplification of 16sRNA, Rv0577, IS1561, Rv1510, RV1970, Rv3877/8, Rv3120, RD1BCG, RD1mic, RD1seal [12, 18, 21], and RD1mon). The full sample set was then screened for a subset of these molecular markers (RD1BCG, RD1mic, RD1seal, and RD1mon), with positive or negative status determined by the presence of (+) or a failure to (−) amplify a PCR fragment of the expected size (RD1BCG, +146 bp/−196 bp; RD1mic, +195 bp/−127 bp; RD1seal, +293 bp/−168 bp; and RD1mon, +700/−less than 5,062 bp but greater than 700 bp). These specific molecular markers were selected to identify M. mungi and ensure the identification of any other MTC organism circulating in the population, differentiating the presence of closely related members of lineage 6 (e.g., M. africanum, dassie bacillus, and M. suricattae). A positive result on RD1mon distinguishes M. mungi from all other MTC.

PCR products from the primer sets were initially sequenced to ensure that the correct products were being amplified. M. tuberculosis H37rv and M. mungi DNA extracted from a confirmed case (mongoose BM10109) were used as positive controls. M. mungi infection in BM10109 was confirmed using spoligotyping (Fig. 5), MIRU-VNTR (see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material), gross pathology (Fig. 9), histology, and the MTC typing panel (Fig. 6), including the additional primer sets provided in Table 1. PCR amplifications were performed in 25 µl reaction mixtures containing 5× HotStarTaq Plus master mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 1× Q solution, and 0.5 µM forward and reverse primers. PCR amplifications were performed as described above, except that the initial activation was followed by 45 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 62°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min (21).

To ensure that our DNA extraction and PCR protocols were functional by sample type, we experimentally spiked each sample type (urine, anal gland, fecal, sewage, and soil) with extracted M. mungi DNA (1 µl), yielding positive PCRs consistent with the controls. We also assessed the sample types for the presence of 16S rRNA genes (a gene used to identify bacteria, in particular, mycobacteria [55], which did not require samples to be spiked) and again, identified PCR-positive samples among all sample types, confirming that our test results were accurate and not a consequence of unknown upstream PCR inhibitors.

PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gels, providing increased ability to resolve ambiguity in amplicon size indicative of variable genomic sequences. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized on the Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR+ imager (Bio-Rad, CA, United States). For all sequencing, positive bands were excised from these gels and the DNA was extracted using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The Virginia Bioinformatics Institute (VBI) at Virginia Tech and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine provided sequencing services. Sequences were searched against the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) of the GenBank database (available at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Study limitations.

M. mungi DNA was definitively found in olfactory secretions and within the nose and skin of infected mongoose hosts, findings that were further confirmed from gross and histopathological examinations. MTC pathogens are not ubiquitous across a tissue type, and PCR evaluations may miss the presence of a pathogen, potentially underestimating the true number of M. mungi-positive samples.

Extensive chemical analysis and behavioral studies have previously been conducted on banded mongoose anal gland secretions, as well as scent marking behaviors (31, 32, 56), with findings from this and other work utilized to interpret our results. While we conclude that environmental pathogen transmission from anal gland secretions and urine are important in M. mungi disease transmission and presentation, it is not possible to conclude that this is the only mechanism of disease exposure and host invasion. We could not, however, identify M. mungi in any other environmental sources surveyed. Experimental duplication of pathogen invasion through scent marking behavior in the mongoose host would provide a “gold standard.” This experiment would not be possible, as is the case with most wildlife disease studies. Experimental manipulations that involve wild animals and infectious disease are impractical to pursue and, furthermore, extremely difficult, if not impossible to justify, particularly in Northern Botswana and northwest Zimbabwe, the only known location where this species is infected with M. mungi.

While we sampled the environment extensively, including den areas of mongoose troops, we cannot exclude the possibility that environmental sources of M. mungi still persist at some extremely low level. As previously mentioned, studies of the environmental persistence of M. bovis identified extended periods of survival in soil, with a survival optimum occurring at 37°C in moist soils (57). Dead cells of M. bovis BCG (Pasteur) did not persist more than 10 days in these environments. Lack of environmental detection within the soil in our system would be consistent with features of this region of Africa: Botswana is an arid country with soils of predominantly Kalahari sands and has a limited rainy season, largely sunny days, and temperatures that regularly exceed 37°C (100°F).

Data set accession number.

Genetic data have been deposited in the publicly accessible GenBank sequence database under accession number KX174310.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Data Set S1 

Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number of tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) results for Mycobacterium mungi-positive samples. Download

Data Set S2 

Results of quantitative PCR assessment of Mycobacterium mungi DNA in mongoose tissues and secretions. Download

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Botswana Department of Wildlife and National Parks for facilitating this work. We also thank M. E. Vandewalle, P. N. Laver, R. Sutcliffe, C. A. Nichols, S. E. Jobbins, and S. Vandewalle for their assistance with field and laboratory investigations and T. Fox for the production of Fig. 8, an original figure.

The authors have no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by Morris Animal Foundation grant number D14ZO-083 and by National Science Foundation grant number 1518663 as part of the joint NSF-NIH-USDA Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases program. K. A. Alexander was also supported in part through the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number U01GM110748. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Alexander KA, Sanderson CE, Larsen MH, Robbe-Austerman S, Williams MC, Palmer MV. 2016. Emerging tuberculosis pathogen hijacks social communication behavior in the group-living banded mongoose (Mungos mungo). mBio 7(3):e00281-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.00281-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.O’Reilly LM, Daborn CJ. 1995. The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tuberc Lung Dis 76(Suppl 1):1–46. doi: 10.1016/0962-8479(95)90591-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Michel AL, Bengis RG, Keet DF, Hofmeyr M, De Klerk LM, Cross PC, Jolles AE, Cooper D, Whyte IJ, Buss P, Godfroid J. 2006. Wildlife tuberculosis in South African conservation areas: implications and challenges. Vet Microbiol 112:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O’Brien DJ, Schmitt SM, Fierke JS, Hogle SA, Winterstein SR, Cooley TM, Moritz WE, Diegel KL, Fitzgerald SD, Berry DE, Kaneene JB. 2002. Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis in free-ranging white-tailed deer, Michigan, USA, 1995–2000. Prev Vet Med 54:47–63. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fine AE, Bolin CA, Gardiner JC, Kaneene JB. 2011. A study of the persistence of Mycobacterium bovis in the environment under natural weather conditions in Michigan, USA. Vet Med Int 2011:765430. doi: 10.4061/2011/765430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Courtenay O, Reilly LA, Sweeney FP, Hibberd V, Bryan S, Ul-Hassan A, Newman C, Macdonald DW, Delahay RJ, Wilson GJ, Wellington EM. 2006. Is Mycobacterium bovis in the environment important for the persistence of bovine tuberculosis? Biol Lett 2:460–462. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tanner M, Michel AL. 1999. Investigation of the viability of M. bovis under different environmental conditions in the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 66:185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Palmer MV, Waters WR, Whipple DL. 2004. Investigation of the transmission of Mycobacterium bovis from deer to cattle through indirect contact. Am J Vet Res 65:1483–1489. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nugent G, Gortazar C, Knowles G. 2015. The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis in wild deer and feral pigs and their roles in the establishment and spread of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand wildlife. N Z Vet J 63(Suppl 1):54–67. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.963792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vicente J, Höfle U, Garrido JM, Acevedo P, Juste R, Barral M, Gortazar C. 2007. Risk factors associated with the prevalence of tuberculosis-like lesions in fenced wild boar and red deer in south central Spain. Vet Res 38:451–464. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2007002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barasona JA, Vicente J, Díez-Delgado I, Aznar J, Gortázar C, Torres MJ. 10 February 2016 Environmental presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in aggregation points at the wildlife/livestock interface. Transbound Emerg Dis doi: 10.1111/tbed.12480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fuller E, Elderd BD, Dwyer G. 2012. Pathogen persistence in the environment and insect-baculovirus interactions: disease-density thresholds, epidemic burnout and insect outbreaks. Am Nat 179:E70–E96. doi: 10.1086/664488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alexander KA, Laver PN, Michel AL, Williams M, van Helden PD, Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC. 2010. Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex pathogen, M. mungi. Emerg Infect Dis 16:1296–1299. doi: 10.3201/eid1608.100314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alexander KA, Pleydell E, Williams MC, Lane EP, Nyange JF, Michel AL. 2002. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an emerging disease of free-ranging wildlife. Emerg Infect Dis 8:598–601. doi: 10.3201/eid0806.010358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liébana E, Aranaz A, Francis B, Cousins D. 1996. Assessment of genetic markers for species differentiation within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol 34:933–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harmsen D, Dostal S, Roth A, Niemann S, Rothgänger J, Sammeth M, Albert J, Frosch M, Richter E. 2003. RIDOM: comprehensive and public sequence database for identification of mycobacterium species. BMC Infect Dis 3:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-3-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dippenaar A, Parsons SD, Sampson SL, van der Merwe RG, Drewe JA, Abdallah AM, Siame KK, Gen van Pittius NC, van Helden PD, Pain A, Warren RM. 2015. Whole genome sequence analysis of Mycobacterium suricattae. Tuberculosis 95:682–688. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alexander KA, Sanderson CE, Laver PN. 2015. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex spp. in group-living African mammals. In Mukundan H, Chambers MA, Waters WR, Larsen MH (ed), Tuberculosis, leprosy and mycobacterial diseases of man and animals: the many hosts of mycobacteria. CABI Publishing, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parsons SD, Drewe JA, Gey van Pittius NC, Warren RM, van Helden PD. 2013. Novel cause of tuberculosis in meerkats, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 19:2004–2007. doi: 10.3201/eid1912.130268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brudey K, Driscoll JR, Rigouts L, Prodinger WM, Gori A, Al-Hajoj SA, Allix C, Aristimuño L, Arora J, Baumanis V, Binder L, Cafrune P, Cataldi A, Cheong S, Diel R, Ellermeier C, Evans JT, Fauville-Dufaux M, Ferdinand S, Garcia de Viedma D. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB 4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol 6:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, Bifani P, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Sola C, Rastogi N, Vatin V, Gutierrez MC, Fauville M, Niemann S, Skuce R. 2006. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis J Clin Microbiol 44:4498–4510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01392-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC, Barnard M, Hesseling A, Engelke E, De Kock M, Gutierrez MC, Chege GK, Victor TC, Hoal EG, van Helden PD. 2006. Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by PCR amplification of genomic regions of difference. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 10:818–822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huard RC, Fabre M, de Haas P, Lazzarini LC, van Soolingen D, Cousins D, Ho JL. 2006. Novel genetic polymorphisms that further delineate the phylogeny of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Bacteriol 188:4271–4287. doi: 10.1128/JB.01783-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dykema PE, Stokes KD, Beckwith NR, Mungin JW, Xu L, Vickers DJ, Reising MM, Bravo DM, Thomsen BV, Robbe-Austerman S. 2016. Development and validation of a direct real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium bovis and implementation into the United States national surveillance program. PeerJ PrePrints 4:e1703v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1703v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meredith A, Del Pozo JD, Smith S, Milne E, Stevenson K, McLuckie J. 2014. Leprosy in red squirrels in Scotland. Vet Rec 175:285–286. doi: 10.1136/vr.g5680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fyfe JA, Lavender CJ, Handasyde KA, Legione AR, O’Brien CR, Stinear TP, Pidot SJ, Seemann T, Benbow ME, Wallace JR, McCowan C, Johnson PD. 2010. A major role for mammals in the ecology of Mycobacterium ulcerans. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 4:e791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mahairas GG, Sabo PJ, Hickey MJ, Singh DC, Stover CK. 1996. Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis. J Bacteriol 178:1274–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pym AS, Brodin P, Brosch R, Huerre M, Cole ST. 2002. Loss of RD1 contributed to the attenuation of the live tuberculosis vaccines Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium microti. Mol Microbiol 46:709–717. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mostowy S, Cousins D, Behr MA. 2004. Genomic interrogation of the dassie bacillus reveals it as a unique RD1 mutant within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Bacteriol 186:104–109. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.1.104-109.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tiwari B, Soory A, Raghunand TR. 2014. An immunomodulatory role for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis region of difference 1 locus proteins PE35 (Rv3872) and PPE68 (Rv3873). FEBS J 281:1556–1570. doi: 10.1111/febs.12723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Davies JM, Lachno DR, Roper TJ. 1988. The anal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles) and its role in social communication. J Zool 216:455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02441.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jordan NR, Mwanguhya F, Kyabulima S, Rüedi P, Cant MA. 2010. Scent marking within and between groups of wild banded mongooses. J Zool 280:72–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00646.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jordan NR, Manser MB, Mwanguhya F, Kyabulima S, Rüedi P, Cant MA. 2011. Scent marking in wild banded mongooses. 1. Sex-specific scents and overmarking. Anim Behav 81:31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leclaire S, Nielsen JF, Thavarajah NK, Manser M, Clutton-Brock TH. 2013. Odour-based kin discrimination in the cooperatively breeding meerkat. Biol Lett 9:20121054. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brennan PJ, Nikaido H. 1995. The envelope of mycobacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 64:29–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Renwick AR, White PC, Bengis RG. 2007. Bovine tuberculosis in southern African wildlife: a multi-species host-pathogen system. Epidemiol Infect 135:529–540. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Drewe JA, Foote AK, Sutcliffe RL, Pearce GP. 2009. Pathology of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta). J Comp Pathol 140:12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2008.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cheeseman CL, Wilesmith JW, Stuart FA. 1989. Tuberculosis: the disease and its epidemiology in the badger, a review. Epidemiol Infect 103:113–125. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800030417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cant MA. 2000. Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses. Anim Behav 59:147–158. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nichols HJ, Cant MA, Hoffman JI, Sanderson JL. 2014. Evidence for frequent incest in a cooperatively breeding mammal. Biol Lett 10:20140898. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gilchrist JS. 2006. Reproductive success in a low skew, communal breeding mammal: the banded mongoose, Mungos mungo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:854–863. doi: 10.1007/s00265-006-0229-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fairbanks BM, Hawley DM, Alexander KA. 2014. The impact of health status on dispersal behavior in banded mongooses (Mungos mungo). Ecohealth 11:258–262. doi: 10.1007/s10393-014-0912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gonzalo-Asensio JS, Malaga W, Pawlik A, Astarie-Dequeker C, Passemar C, Moreau F, Laval F, Daffe M, Martin C, Brosch R, Guilhot C. 2014. Evolutionary history of tuberculosis shaped by conserved mutations in the PhoPR virulence regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:11491–11496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Clifton-Hadley RS, Wilesmith JW, Stuart FA. 1993. Mycobacterium bovis in the European badger (Meles meles): epidemiological findings in tuberculous badgers from a naturally infected population. Epidemiol Infect 111:9–19. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800056624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Drewe JA. 2010. Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats. Proc Biol Sci 277:633–642. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Buesching CD, Macdonald DW. 2001. Scent-marking behaviour of the European badger (Meles meles): resource defence or individual advertisement?, p 321–327. In Chemical signals in vertebrates 9. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Joh RI, Wang H, Weiss H, Weitz JS. 2009. Dynamics of indirectly transmitted infectious diseases with immunological threshold. Bull Math Biol 71:845–862. doi: 10.1007/s11538-008-9384-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JA, Metz JA. 1990. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol 28:365–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pesapane R, Ponder M, Alexander KA. 2013. Tracking pathogen transmission at the human–wildlife interface: banded mongoose and Escherichia coli. Ecohealth 10:115–128. doi: 10.1007/s10393-013-0838-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Altizer S, Hochachka WM, Dhondt AA. 2004. Seasonal dynamics of mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in eastern North American house finches. J Anim Ecol 73:309–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00807.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jobbins SE, Alexander KA. 2015. From whence they came − dynamics of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli in African wildlife. J Wildl Dis 51:811–820. doi: 10.7589/2014-11-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thacker TC, Robbe-Austerman S, Harris B, Van Palmer M, Waters WR. 2013. Isolation of mycobacteria from clinical samples collected in the United States from 2004 to 2011. BMC Vet Res 9:100. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Robbe-Austerman S, Bravo DM, Harris B. 2013. Comparison of the MGIT 960, BACTEC 460 TB and solid media for isolation of Mycobacterium bovis in United States veterinary specimens. BMC Vet Res 9:74. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huard RC, Lazzarini LC, Butler WR, van Soolingen D, Ho JL. 2003. PCR-based method to differentiate the subspecies of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex on the basis of genomic deletions. J Clin Microbiol 41:1637–1650. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1637-1650.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, Van Agterveld M, Van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J. 1997. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 35:907–914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Patel JB. 2001. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial pathogen identification in the clinical laboratory. Mol Diagn 6:313–321. doi: 10.1054/modi.2001.29158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jordan NR, Mwanguhya F, Kyabulima S, Rüedi P, Hodge SJ, Cant MA. 2011. Scent marking in wild banded mongooses. 3. Intrasexual overmarking in females. Anim Behav 81:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Young JS, Gormley E, Wellington EM. 2005. Molecular detection of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG (Pasteur) in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1946–1952. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1946-1952.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Butynski T, Hoeck H, Koren L, de Jong YA. 2015. Procavia capensis. The IUCN Red list of threatened species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Castle Park, United Kingdom. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T41766A21285876.en. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hoffmann M. 2008. Mungos mungo. The IUCN Red list of threatened species 2008. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Castle Park, United Kingdom. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T41621A10517053.en. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jordan NR, Do Linh SE. 2015. Suricata suricatta. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Castle Park, United Kingdom. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T41624A45209377.en. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Set S1 

Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number of tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) results for Mycobacterium mungi-positive samples. Download

Data Set S2 

Results of quantitative PCR assessment of Mycobacterium mungi DNA in mongoose tissues and secretions. Download


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES