Skip to main content
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
. 2015 Mar 27;29(2):544–551. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12553

Co‐infections with Respiratory Viruses in Dogs with Bacterial Pneumonia

SJ Viitanen 1,, A Lappalainen 1, MM Rajamäki 1
PMCID: PMC4895503  PMID: 25818209

Abstract

Background

Bacterial pneumonia (BP) is an inflammation of the lower airways and lung parenchyma secondary to bacterial infection. The pathogenesis of BP in dogs is complex and the role of canine respiratory viruses has not been fully evaluated.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of viral co‐infections in dogs with BP and to assess demographic or clinical variables as well as disease severity associated with viral co‐infections.

Animals

Twenty household dogs with BP caused by opportunistic bacteria and 13 dogs with chronic (>30 days) tracheobronchitis caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica (BBTB).

Methods

Prospective cross‐sectional observational study. Diagnosis was confirmed by clinical and laboratory findings, diagnostic imaging, and cytologic and microbiologic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage or transtracheal wash fluid. Canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV), canine adenovirus, canine herpes virus, canine influenzavirus, canine distemper virus, canine respiratory coronavirus (CRCoV) and canine pneumovirus, as well as B. bronchiseptica and Mycoplasma spp. were analyzed in respiratory samples using PCR assays.

Results

CPIV was detected in 7/20 and CRCoV in 1/20 dogs with BP. Respiratory viruses were not detected in dogs with BBTB. There were no significant differences in clinical variables between BP dogs with and without a viral co‐infection.

Conclusion and Clinical Importance

Respiratory viruses were found frequently in dogs with BP and may therefore play an important role in the etiology and pathogenesis of BP. Clinical variables and disease severity did not differ between BP dogs with and without viral co‐infection.

Keywords: Canine, Canine infectious respiratory disease, CIRD


Abbreviations

BAL

bronchoalveolar lavage

BALF

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

BBTB

tracheobronchitis caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica

BP

bacterial pneumonia

CAP

community‐acquired pneumonia

CAV‐2

canine adenovirus type 2

CDV

canine distemper virus

CIRD

canine infectious respiratory disease

CIV

canine influenza virus

CHV

canine herpes virus

CnPnV

canine Pneumovirus

CPIV

canine parainfluenza virus

CRCoV

canine respiratory coronavirus

CRP

C‐reactive protein

TTW

transtracheal wash

Bacterial pneumonia (BP) is an acquired inflammation of the lower airways and lung parenchyma secondary to bacterial infection.1 Because BP is difficult to induce experimentally in healthy animals, the pathogenesis is considered complex and involves several underlying mechanisms.2 Possible predisposing factors for the development of BP, such as diseases leading to aspiration, decreased ciliary function, or immunodeficiency, have been described in Dogs.3 However, the role of canine respiratory viruses in the development of BP and the possible connection between canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD) and BP have not yet been fully evaluated.

Canine infectious respiratory disease, also known as infectious tracheobronchitis or kennel cough, is considered 1 of the most common infectious diseases in dogs worldwide.4 It is highly contagious and affects the larynx, trachea, bronchi, and nasal mucosa, causing acute respiratory signs, mainly cough, which usually are self‐limiting.4 Because of the contagious nature of CIRD, it is most prevalent in dense dog populations such as in kennels and rehoming centers.4 Canine infectious respiratory disease has a multifactorial etiology, and several respiratory viruses as well as bacterial pathogens have been shown to contribute to the disease complex.4, 5, 6 Canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV) and canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV‐2) were first detected in dogs with contagious tracheobronchitis in the 1960s, and since then these viruses have been considered as the principal etiologic agents in CIRD.7, 8, 9, 10 Canine herpes virus (CHV) also was detected in dogs with respiratory signs decades ago, but its role in CIRD remains controversial.11, 12, 13, 14 In addition to these pathogens, novel respiratory viruses recently have been reported. Canine respiratory coronavirus (CRCoV) was first identified in 2003 in dogs at a rehoming center in the United Kingdom.15 Subsequently, evidence of contagious tracheobronchitis caused by CRCoV has been reported worldwide.16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Canine influenza virus (CIV) was first described in a racing Greyhound population in the United States in 2004, and it was later shown that CIV is widespread in the USA.21, 22, 23 Canine pneumovirus (CnPnV) recently was discovered in dogs with respiratory disease in the United States, but the role of CnPnV as a causative agent in CIRD still is not fully known.24, 25, 26 In addition to viral agents, some bacterial pathogens such as Bordetella bronchiseptica, Mycoplasma spp., and more recently Streptococcus equi sp. zooepidemicus, have been shown to contribute to the etiology of CIRD.27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 Although not considered part of the CIRD complex, canine distemper virus (CDV) is an important respiratory pathogen causing severe systemic disease characterized by a variety of clinical signs, including respiratory signs.33

Viral‐bacterial co‐infections in the respiratory tract are well documented in humans with community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP), and epidemiologic data as well as laboratory studies support the conclusion that respiratory viruses predispose to the development of secondary bacterial infections.34, 35 Several mechanisms have been shown to contribute to this situation: Viruses destroy the respiratory epithelium and facilitate bacterial adhesion, viral infection up‐regulates expression of molecules that bacteria utilize as receptors, and virus‐induced immunosuppression promotes secondary bacterial infection.35, 36 Recent advances in molecular diagnostic techniques have greatly increased understanding of the etiology of CAP in humans. Viruses affecting the lower respiratory tract currently are recognized as causative and complicating factors in up to 40% of humans with CAP.37, 38, 39

Preceding or concurrent infections with CIRD viruses also have been considered as a possible etiological factor in dogs with BP, although there currently are only isolated reports suggesting this connection.1, 40, 41 In dogs, BP most often is caused by opportunistic bacteria that belong to the normal oral flora.42, 43 However, published studies on viral‐bacterial co‐infections in dogs almost exclusively describe dogs housed in dense populations, such as kennels or rehoming centers, that are infected with respiratory viruses and bacteria belonging to the CIRD complex.6, 7, 44 Nevertheless, it is likely that respiratory viruses also are an important etiologic factor in dogs with BP caused by opportunistic bacteria in a similar manner as has been reported in humans.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of viral respiratory infections in household dogs diagnosed with BP and to assess the possible demographic or clinical variables associated with viral co‐infections as well as to assess the impact of viral co‐infections in the severity of the disease.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

The study was conducted as a prospective cross‐sectional observational study. A prior sample size calculation was not performed.

Study Population

Privately owned household dogs diagnosed with BP at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Helsinki between March 2011 and October 2013 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Dogs with prolonged (duration of clinical signs >30 days) tracheobronchitis caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica (BBTB) were included as controls for the virus analysis.

All dogs living in or being recently (<4 weeks ago) exposed to environments with high infection pressure (eg, boarding kennels, rescue shelters) were excluded. Dogs that had been vaccinated against CDV, CAV‐2, CPIV, or B. bronchiseptica <4 weeks before inclusion in the study were excluded.

Diagnostic Testing and Sample Collection

A full clinical examination was performed, with special emphasis on the respiratory tract. Thoracic radiographs (laterolateral and ventrodorsal or dorsoventral views) were obtained at presentation and assessed by the same radiologist (AL), who was blinded to the patient data. Hematology, serum biochemistry, serum C‐reactive protein (CRP) and fecal analysis were performed. Arterial blood gas analysis for partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide were measured and the alveolar‐arterial gradient was calculated. Bronchoscopy was performed with a 4.9‐mm flexible endoscope,1 and airway samples for cytology, semiquantitative aerobic and anaerobic bacterial culture, qualitative Mycoplasma spp. culture and PCR analysis were obtained by weight‐adjusted (1 ml/kg 0.9% NaCl) bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).45 Transtracheal wash (TTW) sampling was used in dogs with BP in which anesthesia was considered unsafe because of the severity of the disease.46

Bacterial pneumonia was diagnosed when there were typical acute signs (at least 3 of the following: fever, lethargy, dyspnea, tachypnea, cough) and findings compatible with BP on thoracic radiographs.1, 42, 43 A bacterial origin was proved by cytological confirmation of bacterial infection in respiratory samples (>2 intracellular bacteria/oil immersion field), positive bacterial culture (≥103 colony‐forming units/mL in airway samples),47 or rapid response to antibiotics and full clinical and radiographic normalization with antibiotic treatment. All dogs with BP were followed until full cure. Prolonged BBTB was diagnosed when there was a cough lasting for >30 days and a positive bacterial culture of B. bronchiseptica (>103 colony‐forming units/mL) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and an absence of other diagnosed airway pathology.

Sample Handling and Analysis

Hematology, serum biochemistry, arterial blood gas analysis, serum CRP, and fecal analysis as well as cytologic and microbiologic analysis of respiratory samples were performed as previously described.48 Semiquantitative bacterial culture of BALF and TTW fluid was performed as follows: A 10‐μL volume of the specimen was streaked onto agars. Bacterial counts were quantified by calculating the colonies on a plate and multiplying the number of colonies by the dilution factor. The limit of detection was 100 colony‐forming units/mL. The remaining respiratory samples (BALF, TTW) and serum were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C. CPIV, CAV‐2, CHV, CIV, CDV, and CRCoV, as well as Mycoplasma spp. and B. bronchiseptica, were analyzed by real‐time PCR analysis at a commercial reference laboratory.2 6 CnPnV was analyzed by RT‐PCR at the laboratory3 responsible for the discovery of this pathogen.25

Statistical Analysis

Normality testing was based on Shapiro–Wilk's test of normality and normal QQ plots. The differences between groups with negative and positive virus PCR were evaluated using the independent samples Student's t‐test (normally distributed variables) and Mann–Whitney U‐test (non‐normally distributed variables). The Mann–Whitney U‐test also was used to evaluate whether there were differences in BALF and TTW differential cell counts in all dogs with BP. P‐values < .05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using commercial statistical software.4

Ethical Approval and Owner Consent

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Helsinki. Owner consent was obtained from the owners of the dogs before participation.

Results

Dogs

Altogether, 33 dogs were included in the study, consisting of 20 dogs diagnosed with BP (10/20 male and 10/20 female) and 13 with BBTB (8/13 male and 5/13 female). The age distribution and weights of dogs with BP are presented in Table 1. Dogs in both groups represented various breeds without over‐representation of any single breed.

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic and clinical findings in dogs with bacterial pneumonia with positive and negative respiratory virus PCR results

Negative Respiratory Virus PCR (n = 12) Positive Respiratory Virus PCR (n = 8) P‐Value
Sex Male 5/12 Male 5/8
Female 7/12 Female 3/8
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Weight (kg) 25.0 ± 16.4 41.7 ± 15.7 .037
Body temperature (°C) 39.6 ± 0.9 39.2 ± 0.8 .31
Respiratory rate (breaths/min) 59 ± 21 45 ± 20 .15
Arterial paO2 (mmHg) 74.9 ± 11.1 79.1 ± 14.1 .49
Arterial paCO2 (mmHg) 29.3 ± 3.9 30.9 ± 1.1 .19
Alveolar‐arterial O2 gradient 41.3 ± 11.8 33.5 ± 14.4 .23
Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
Age, years 5.8 (1.3–8.4) 0.9 (0.7–1.4) .057
Duration of clinical signs (days) 1.0 (1–3.5) 3.0 (1.0–5.3) .48
Duration of hospitalization (days) 1.8 (0.0–4.8) 1.0 (0.3–1.5) .43
Serum C‐reactive protein (mg/L) 140 (84–192) 63 (52–178) .98
Blood leukocyte count (109/L) 14.6 (12.5–22.0) 10.6 (7.4–22.9) .34
Segmented neutrophil count (109/L) 11.7 (9.1–15.6) 7.8 (5.2–17.5) .27
Band neutrophil count (109/L) 0.5 (0.08–2.0) 0.3 (0.0–0.9) .48
Lymphocyte count (109/L) 0.7 (0.4–1.7) 1.5 (0.4–3.6) .52
Eosinophil count (109/L) 0.3 (0.0–0.6) 0.2 (0.0–0.6) .91
Monocyte count (109/L) 1.0 (0.3–1.7) 0.7 (0.5–1.5) .97
Basophil count (109/L) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) .68

Other simultaneous respiratory diseases or bacterial infections were identified in 4/12 dogs (chronic bronchitis 2/4, tracheoesophageal fistula 1/4, oral abscess 1/4). Laryngeal examination was not performed in dogs with BP and therefore aspiration etiology could not be fully excluded. All dogs with BP presented as acute (median duration of clinical signs, 1 day; range, 0.5–7 days; interquartile range, 1–3.8 days) emergency cases of varying severity (14/20 dogs required hospitalization for a median duration of 1.8 days; interquartile range, 1–4.6 days), and none of the dogs died or was euthanized. All dogs with BBTB were clinically stable and were presented with chronic cough (median duration of clinical signs, 120 days; interquartile range, 60–186 days).

Clinical Findings

Body temperature, respiratory rate, serum CRP, results from arterial blood gas analysis and hematology, as well as information on the duration of clinical signs and duration of hospitalization in dogs with BP are presented in Table 1. Fecal analysis results were available for 15/20 dogs with BP, and they were all negative for lung worms and intestinal parasites. Radiographic findings in dogs with BP are presented in Table 2. Demographic and clinical data in dogs with and without viral co‐ infection were compared and results are presented in Tables 1 and 3. Dogs with viral co‐infections were significantly heavier (P = .037) than dogs with negative virus PCR results. Duration of clinical signs or hospitalization, age of the dogs, body temperature, respiratory rate, serum CRP, hematology, arterial blood gas analysis, and BALF and TTW cytology results did not differ significantly between dogs with and without viral co‐infection.

Table 2.

Radiographic findings in dogs with bacterial pneumonia with positive and negative respiratory virus PCR results

Radiographic Pattern Number of Dogs Location Number of Dogs
Negative virus PCR (n = 12) Alveolar, single lobe 4/12 Right cranial lobe 1/4
Right caudal lobe 1/4
Left cranial cranial lobe 1/4
Left caudal cranial lobe 1/4
Alveolar, multiple lobes 5/12 Right cranial lobe 3/5
Right middle lobe 1/5
Right caudal lobe 1/5
Left cranial cranial lobe 3/5
Left caudal cranial lobe 1/5
Left caudal lobe 1/5
Patchy alveolar 1/5
Bronchointerstitial (graded moderate–severe) 3/12
Positive virus PCR (n = 8) Alveolar, single lobe 2/8 Right middle lobe 2/2
Alveolar, multiple lobes 4/8 Right cranial lobe 2/4
Right middle lobe 3/4
Left cranial cranial lobe 2/4
Left caudal cranial lobe 2/4
Patchy alveolar 1/4
Bronchointerstitial (graded moderate–severe) 2/8

Table 3.

Comparison of cytological analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage and transtracheal wash fluid in dogs with bacterial pneumonia with positive and negative respiratory virus PCR results

Negative Respiratory Virus PCR (n = 12) Positive Respiratory Virus PCR (n = 8) P‐Value
Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
Total cell count (109/L) 1.4 (0.1–10.6) 4.7 (0.2–31.7) .57
Neutrophils (%) 66.1 (7.7–95.9) 65.2 (12.0–90.2) .91
Eosinophils (%) 0.4 (0.0–9.0) 1.0 (0.1–3.5) .62
Mast cells (%) 0.0 (0.0–1.8) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) .57
Lymphocytes (%) 5.0 (0.7–16.6) 4.7 (0.4–20.4) 1.00
Macrophages (%) 23.7 (3.7–57.9) 22.1 (8.2–57.6) 1.00
Epithelial cells (%) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.7) .57
Basophils (%) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 1.00
Plasma cells (%) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 1.00

Respiratory Samples

In the PCR analysis of BALF or TTW fluid, CPIV was detected in 7/20 (35%; 95% confidence interval, 14–56%) and CRCoV in 1/20 (5%; 95% confidence interval, 0–15%) dogs with BP. CAV‐2, CHV, CIV, CDV, or CnPnV were not detected in any of the samples. Dogs with positive virus PCR did not have other diseases predisposing to BP. Respiratory viruses were not detected in dogs with BBTB.

Respiratory samples were retrieved using BAL in 13/20 and TTW in 7/20 dogs diagnosed with BP. BAL was used as a sampling method in all dogs with BBTB. Results from cytology analysis of BALF and TTW fluid in BP dogs are presented in Table 3. Because BALF and TTW fluid cytology did not differ significantly in other variables aside from the percentage of epithelial cells (median in BALF, 0.0; interquartile range, 0.0–0.0 versus median in TTW fluid, 0.7; interquartile range, 0.0–14.7; P = .008), combined results are represented for the 2 sampling techniques.

Altogether, 11/20 dogs with BP had received antimicrobials before sampling. Significant bacterial growth (≥103 colony‐forming units/mL in BALF or TTW fluid) was identified in the primary culture in 11/20 samples (5/11 dogs with prior antimicrobial treatment). A single species was isolated in 8/11 samples, including Pasteurella sp. (1/10), Escherichia coli (2/10), Streptococcus sp. (2/10), Hemophilus sp. (1/10), Mycoplasma sp. (1/10), and Nocardiopsis sp. (1/10), and 2 species in 3 samples, Pasteurella sp. and Mycoplasma sp.47 Intracellular bacteria were seen in 6/11 dogs with significant bacterial growth in primary culture. In 1 dog with a negative primary culture and prior antimicrobial treatment, >2 intracellular bacteria/oil immersion field were demonstrated, and Actinomyces sp. was cultured after enrichment.47 Positive bacterial growth was detected only after enrichment in 4/20 dogs (single species of bacteria, including Streptococcus sp. [1/4], Pasteurella sp. [1/4]), Haemophilus sp. [1/4], and Actinomyces sp. [1/4]), 2 of these dogs had received prior antimicrobial treatment. A negative bacterial culture in airway samples was recorded in 4/20 dogs (2 had received prior antimicrobial treatment), but they showed an acute onset of respiratory signs and had new alveolar densities in thoracic radiographs as well as neutrophilia in BALF cytology. All of these dogs showed a rapid response to antibiotics, and a full clinical and radiographic cure was achieved with antimicrobial treatment. CPIV was detected by PCR in 2/4 and Mycoplasma spp. in 1/4 dogs with negative culture results.

Information on previous CDV, CAV‐2, and CPIV vaccinations was available for all dogs with BP. All dogs with positive CPIV PCR in respiratory samples (n = 7) had been vaccinated against CPIV <12 months previously (median, 6.5 months; interquartile range, 4.5–9.0 months). In total, 12/13 dogs with negative CPIV PCR in respiratory samples were vaccinated against CPIV (median, 13.0 months; interquartile range 2.9–24 months). There was no significant difference in the timing of CPIV vaccination between dogs with positive and negative respiratory virus PCR (P = .152). All dogs participating in this study had previously been vaccinated against CAV and CDV.

Bordetella bronchiseptica PCR analysis was positive in 12/13 dogs with BBTB and 1/20 dogs with BP. All dogs with BBTB and none of the dogs with BP had positive growth of B. bronchiseptica in BALF or TTW fluid.

In addition to Mycoplasma spp. PCR analysis, a culture for Mycoplasma spp. was performed in 15/20 dogs with BP and 4/13 dogs with BBTB. Mycoplasma PCR was positive in 8/20 dogs with BP and 3/13 dogs with BBTB. Mycoplasma culture was positive in 4/15 dogs with BP and 2/4 dogs with BBTB. Mycoplasma PCR was positive in all dogs with BP and BBTB with positive culture results. Additionally, PCR was positive in 3 dogs with negative Mycoplasma culture results (2 dogs with BP and 1 with BBTB) and in 2 dogs with BP lacking culture results.

Discussion

Bacterial pneumonia is a serious lower respiratory tract infection in dogs with substantial morbidity and risk of mortality. Although BP was described in Dogs decades ago, information on the mechanisms leading to the development of the disease still is limited. Factors such as diseases predisposing to aspiration, immunodeficiency, or ciliary dysfunction that lead to impairment of pulmonary defense mechanisms and thereby predispose to the development of BP have been described.3 However, the role of preceding or concurrent infections with CIRD viruses has not been fully evaluated in dogs with BP, although it has been suspected to play a role in the etiology, as reported in humans with CAP.34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 Previously, respiratory viral‐bacterial co‐infections mostly have been reported in dogs housed in dense populations, such as kennels and rescue shelters, and bacteria accompanying viruses have been primary CIRD bacteria (B. bronchiseptica, S. equi sp. zooepidemicus, and Mycoplasma spp.).6, 7, 19, 44

Our study indicates that respiratory viruses, primarily CPIV, frequently are also found in dogs with BP, which is caused by opportunistic bacteria. Therefore, it is likely that CIRD viruses can predispose dogs to opportunistic bacterial lung infections by increasing bacterial adhesion, as has been reported in humans.35

In this study, CPIV was the most common viral pathogen detected, which is in accordance with previous reports describing viruses responsible for CIRD in different countries.6, 13, 19 Novel CRCoV was detected in 1 dog with BP, further demonstrating that CRCoV has a worldwide distribution and also may be detected in Northern Europe.

Canine parainfluenza virus was prevalent despite recent vaccination, which can be considered indicative of poor vaccine‐induced antibody coverage against CPIV. In contrast, CAV and CDV were not encountered in dogs vaccinated against these viruses. This finding is in accordance with previous reports. In a longitudinal study on respiratory viruses in a rehoming center in England, CPIV was commonly detected despite regular vaccinations, but CDV and CAV‐2 were not encountered, most likely because of adequate vaccination coverage.13 It remains unknown whether more efficient CPIV vaccines and possible CRCoV vaccinations could decrease the incidence of BP, as has been shown in humans, in whom protection against influenza and respiratory syncytial virus decreased the incidence of secondary bacterial infections.50, 51, 52

Nosocomial infections with respiratory viruses also have been reported in dogs. An outbreak of CPIV was described in an animal hospital and an outbreak of CHV was reported in immunocompromised dogs.53, 54 Because co‐infections with CIRD viruses are shown to be common in dogs with BP, the infection risk needs to be taken into account when treating BP patients in the same premises (eg, intensive care units) with immunocompromised patients.

Dogs with viral co‐infections were significantly heavier than those without virus infection. This finding might be influenced by the structure of the virus‐negative group: All 4 dogs with another predisposing factor for the development of BP were <20 kg (West Highland White Terrier, Dachshund, Spanish Water Dog, and Schnauzer). Dogs with viral co‐infections also were younger than those without viral co‐infection, although this did not reach statistical significance. This finding is not unexpected, because young animals might have insufficient acquired immunity against CIRD viruses.2

Clinical findings, arterial blood gas analysis, and hematology, as well as respiratory sample cytology in both groups were in accordance with previously reported findings in BP and did not differ between virus‐negative and virus‐positive groups.42, 43, 48 On thoracic radiographs, an alveolar pattern in the cranial and the middle lobes was predominant in both groups without group predisposition. Radiographic findings in dogs with BP have been thoroughly reported previously for cases of aspiration etiology.55, 56 In our study, radiographic findings in dogs with BP caused by other etiologies were similar to those reported for aspiration pneumonia. Aspiration etiology was considered unlikely, because none of the dogs with BP had a history of vomiting, regurgitation, recent anesthesia or signs compatible with laryngeal paralysis. Our findings could indicate that an alveolar pattern in cranial and middle lung lobes may be typical for pneumonia, regardless of etiology. On the other hand, aspiration pneumonia might have played a role in some dogs but could not be confirmed or denied based on available history, examination findings, or imaging. We were unable to identify clinical variables to reliably distinguish dogs with BP and viral co‐infection, and PCR testing therefore appears to be required to identify viral respiratory infections in dogs with BP. A similar finding was reported in humans.57

There were no significant differences in the duration of hospitalization (P = .427) or partial pressures of arterial oxygen at presentation (P = .343) between BP dogs with and without viral co‐infection, indicating that viral co‐infections do not appear to cause a more severe course of BP. In dogs, limited information is available on the severity of BP of different etiological origins, and in humans the reports are contradictory. Some studies have shown that mixed infections with viruses and bacteria induce a more severe clinical disease, whereas others have been unable to demonstrate significant differences in disease severity.49, 58, 59, 60, 61

Previous studies reporting microbiological findings in dogs with pneumonia have found growth of a single species of bacteria in 40–74% of cases.42, 43 All of these studies used TTW as a sampling method. Factors that might have influenced the finding of primarily a single species of bacteria in our study may be the use of BAL as a sampling method in majority of cases, compared to previous studies where TTW was used and the widespread use of prior antimicrobial treatments in these dogs.

Novel molecular methods have allowed the rapid testing of several respiratory pathogens simultaneously. Lower respiratory tract samples are considered ideal when diagnosing viral respiratory infections in humans with CAP, and it has been shown that virus‐positive PCR in BALF is associated with respiratory symptoms in humans.62, 63 Naturally, the invasiveness of retrieving BALF, compared to upper respiratory sampling, limits the usefulness of this accurate sample. However, especially when using molecular methods, virus recovery from the upper respiratory tract may be suggestive of virus exposure rather than indicative of an active viral infection.6 We chose lower respiratory tract samples in order to decrease the number of false‐positive results, but a comparison of PCR findings between upper and lower respiratory tract samples would be useful. Underestimation of virus‐positive PCR results may have occurred in our dogs in cases in which viral infection preceded BP and sampling was performed outside of the viral shedding period.

Bordetella bronchiseptica and Mycoplasma spp. were tested using both PCR and conventional culture methods. Polymerase chain reaction was, as expected, able to reliably demonstrate both pathogens in dogs with positive culture results. Additionally, Mycoplasma PCR was positive in 3 dogs with negative culture results. The clinical relevance of these positive results is difficult to interpret, because Mycoplasma spp. are also encountered in the respiratory tract of healthy dogs.64 On the other hand, because Mycoplasma requires special culture methods (and in this study also shipping to an outside laboratory), there might have been dogs in which Mycoplasma culture was falsely negative. Quantitative PCR might have aided in assessing the clinical relevance of these PCR findings.

Respiratory viruses were not detected in control dogs with prolonged BBTB. Bordetella bronchiseptica commonly accompanies CIRD viruses in acute respiratory infections and signs usually are self‐limiting.6, 19, 28, 29 Dogs with prolonged BBTB were considered more likely than those of the general dog population to have been exposed to CIRD viruses previously. Infections with CIRD viruses are self‐limiting within the first weeks, and because all BBTB dogs had prolonged clinical signs, an active viral infection therefore was considered unlikely.7, 9, 11, 65 Consequently, the negative results in the BBTB group are considered to increase the reliability of positive virus PCR findings in dogs with BP.

The most important limitation in this study was the small number of dogs in each group. This decreases statistical power (ie, the possibility of detecting a true difference between groups or reporting a difference that does not truly exist). Additionally, because this study was performed in Northern Europe in household dogs with low infection pressure, the results may not be applicable in all situations.

In conclusion, respiratory viruses, primarily CPIV, were found frequently in lower respiratory samples of dogs with BP and may play an important role in the etiology and pathogenesis of BP. Additionally, clinical variables and disease severity did not differ between BP dogs with and without viral co‐infection.

Supporting information

Table S1. Respiratory sampling technique, information on prior antimicrobial treatment as well as the Gram stain, culture and PCR results for individual dogs (n = 20) with bacterial pneumonia.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Merja Rantala and Prof Satu Sankari for their contribution to laboratory analysis and Laura Parikka for her technical assistance. Jouni Junnila from 4Pharma Ltd is thanked for his contribution to statistical analysis.

Conflict of Interest Declaration: Authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Off‐label Antimicrobial Declaration: Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.

This research was performed at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Footnotes

1

Olympus GIF N180, Olympus Medical Systems Europa GMBH, Hamburg, Germany

2

IDEXX GmbH, Mörikestraße 28/3, D‐71636 Ludwigsburg, Germany

3

Animal Health Diagnostic Centre, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, 240 Farrier Road, Ithaca, NY 14853

4

PASW Statistics 18, SPSS Inc, 233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL

References

  • 1. Brady CA. Bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats In: King LG, ed. Textbook of Respiratory Disease in Dogs and Cats, 1st ed St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2004:412–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ford RB. Bacterial pneumonia In: Bonagura JD, Twedt DC, ed. Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XIV, 14th ed Saunders Elsevier, St Louis, MO; 2009:658–662. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dear JD. Bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2014;44:143–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Buonavoglia C, Martella V. Canine respiratory viruses. Vet Res 2007;38:355–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Priestnall SL, Mitchell JA, Walker CA, et al. New and emerging pathogens in canine infectious respiratory disease. Vet Pathol 2014;51:492–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schulz BS, Kurz S, Weber K, et al. Detection of respiratory viruses and Bordetella bronchiseptica in dogs with acute respiratory tract infections. Vet J 2014;201:365–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Appel MJ, Percy DH. SV‐5‐Like parainfluenza virus in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970;156:1778–1781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Crandell RA, Brumlow WB, Davison VE. Isolation of a parainfluenza virus from sentry dogs with upper respiratory disease. Am J Vet Res 1968;29:2141–2147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ditchfield J, Macpherson LW, Zbitnew A. Association of canine adenovirus (toronto A 26/61) with an outbreak of laryngotracheitis (“kennel cough”): A preliminary report. Can Vet J 1962;3:238–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Binn LN, Alford JP, Marchwicki RH, et al. Studies of respiratory disease in random‐source laboratory dogs: Viral infections in unconditioned dogs. Lab Anim Sci 1979;29:48–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Karpas A, Garcia FG, Calvo F, Cross RE. Experimental production of canine tracheobronchitis (kennel cough) with canine herpesvirus isolated from naturally infected dogs. Am J Vet Res 1968;29:1251–1257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Appel MJ, Menegus M, Parsonson IM, Carmichael LE. Pathogenesis of canine herpesvirus in specific‐pathogen‐free dogs: 5‐ to 12‐week‐old pups. Am J Vet Res 1969;30:2067–2073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Erles K, Dubovi EJ, Brooks HW, Brownlie J. Longitudinal study of viruses associated with canine infectious respiratory disease. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:4524–4529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Erles K, Brownlie J. Investigation into the causes of canine infectious respiratory disease: Antibody responses to canine respiratory coronavirus and canine herpesvirus in two kennelled dog populations. Arch Virol 2005;150:1493–1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Erles K, Toomey C, Brooks HW, Brownlie J. Detection of a group 2 coronavirus in dogs with canine infectious respiratory disease. Virology 2003;310:216–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Priestnall SL, Pratelli A, Brownlie J, Erles K. Serological prevalence of canine respiratory coronavirus in southern Italy and epidemiological relationship with canine enteric coronavirus. J Vet Diagn Invest 2007;19:176–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Priestnall SL, Brownlie J, Dubovi EJ, Erles K. Serological prevalence of canine respiratory coronavirus. Vet Microbiol 2006;115:43–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. An DJ, Jeoung HY, Jeong W, et al. A serological survey of canine respiratory coronavirus and canine influenza virus in korean dogs. J Vet Med Sci 2010;72:1217–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mochizuki M, Yachi A, Ohshima T, et al. Etiologic study of upper respiratory infections of household dogs. J Vet Med Sci 2008;70:563–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ellis JA, McLean N, Hupaelo R, Haines DM. Detection of coronavirus in cases of tracheobronchitis in dogs: A retrospective study from 1971 to 2003. Can Vet J 2005;46:447–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Anderson TC, Bromfield CR, Crawford PC, et al. Serological evidence of H3N8 canine influenza‐like virus circulation in USA dogs prior to 2004. Vet J 2012;191:312–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Crawford PC, Dubovi EJ, Castleman WL, et al. Transmission of equine influenza virus to dogs. Science 2005;310:482–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Anderson TC, Crawford PC, Dubovi EJ, et al. Prevalence of and exposure factors for seropositivity to H3N8 canine influenza virus in dogs with influenza‐like illness in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;242:209–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Renshaw RW, Zylich NC, Laverack MA, et al. Pneumovirus in dogs with acute respiratory disease. Emerg Infect Dis 2010;16:993–995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Renshaw R, Laverack M, Zylich N, et al. Genomic analysis of a pneumovirus isolated from dogs with acute respiratory disease. Vet Microbiol 2011;150:88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Percopo CM, Dubovi EJ, Renshaw RW, et al. Canine pneumovirus replicates in mouse lung tissue and elicits inflammatory pathology. Virology 2011;416:26–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bemis DA, Carmichael LE, Appel MJ. Naturally occurring respiratory disease in a kennel caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica . Cornell Vet 1977;67:282–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bemis DA. Bordetella and mycoplasma respiratory infections in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992;22:1173–1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Appel M, Bemis DA. The canine contagious respiratory disease complex (kennel cough). Cornell Vet 1978;68(Suppl 7):70–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chalker VJ, Owen WM, Paterson C, et al. Mycoplasmas associated with canine infectious respiratory disease. Microbiology 2004;150:3491–3497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chalker VJ, Brooks HW, Brownlie J. The association of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus with canine infectious respiratory disease. Vet Microbiol 2003;95:149–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Rycroft AN, Tsounakou E, Chalker V. Serological evidence of Mycoplasma cynos infection in canine infectious respiratory disease. Vet Microbiol 2007;120:358–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Martella V, Elia G, Buonavoglia C. Canine distemper virus. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2008;38:787–797, vii–viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Joseph C, Togawa Y, Shindo N. Bacterial and viral infections associated with influenza. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2013;7(Suppl 2):105–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hament JM, Kimpen JL, Fleer A, Wolfs TF. Respiratory viral infection predisposing for bacterial disease: A concise review. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1999;26:189–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Peltola VT, McCullers JA. Respiratory viruses predisposing to bacterial infections: Role of neuraminidase. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:S87–S97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Camps Serra M, Cervera C, Pumarola T, et al. Virological diagnosis in community‐acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Eur Respir J 2008;31:618–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Huijskens EG, van Erkel AJ, Palmen FM, et al. Viral and bacterial aetiology of community‐acquired pneumonia in adults. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2013;7:567–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Choi SH, Hong SB, Ko GB, et al. Viral infection in patients with severe pneumonia requiring intensive care unit admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:325–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Damian M, Morales E, Salas G, Trigo FJ. Immunohistochemical detection of antigens of distemper, adenovirus and parainfluenza viruses in domestic dogs with pneumonia. J Comp Pathol 2005;133:289–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Almes KM, Janardhan KS, Anderson J, et al. Fatal canine adenoviral pneumonia in two litters of bulldogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 2010;22:780–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jameson PH, King LA, Lappin MR, Jones RL. Comparison of clinical signs, diagnostic findings, organisms isolated, and clinical outcome in dogs with bacterial pneumonia: 93 cases (1986–1991). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:206–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Thayer G, Robinson S. Bacterial bronchopneumonia in the dog—A review of 42 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984;20:731–735. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chvala S, Benetka V, Mostl K, et al. Simultaneous canine distemper virus, canine adenovirus type 2, and Mycoplasma cynos infection in a dog with pneumonia. Vet Pathol 2007;44:508–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Melamies MA, Jarvinen AK, Seppala KM, et al. Comparison of results for weight‐adjusted and fixed‐amount bronchoalveolar lavage techniques in healthy beagles. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:694–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Creevy KE. Airway evaluation and flexible endoscopic procedures in dogs and cats: Laryngoscopy, transtracheal wash, tracheobronchoscopy, and bronchoalveolar lavage. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009;39:869–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Peeters DE, McKiernan BC, Weisiger RM, et al. Quantitative bacterial cultures and cytological examination of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2000;14:534–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Viitanen SJ, Laurila HP, Lilja‐Maula LI, et al. Serum C‐reactive protein as a diagnostic biomarker in dogs with bacterial respiratory diseases. J Vet Intern Med 2014;28:84–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jennings LC, Anderson TP, Beynon KA, et al. Incidence and characteristics of viral community‐acquired pneumonia in adults. Thorax 2008;63:42–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Tessmer A, Welte T, Schmidt‐Ott R, et al. Influenza vaccination is associated with reduced severity of community‐acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2011;38:147–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Heikkinen T, Ruuskanen O, Waris M, et al. Influenza vaccination in the prevention of acute otitis media in children. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:445–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Simoes EA, Groothuis JR, Tristram DA, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus‐enriched globulin for the prevention of acute otitis media in high risk children. J Pediatr 1996;129:214–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kawakami K, Ogawa H, Maeda K, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of serious canine infectious tracheobronchitis (kennel cough) caused by canine herpesvirus infection. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:1176–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Weese JS, Stull J. Respiratory disease outbreak in a veterinary hospital associated with canine parainfluenza virus infection. Can Vet J 2013;54:79–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Eom K, Seong Y, Park H, et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of experimentally induced lung aspiration sites in dogs. J Vet Sci 2006;7:397–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kogan DA, Johnson LR, Jandrey KE, Pollard RE. Clinical, clinicopathologic, and radiographic findings in dogs with aspiration pneumonia: 88 cases (2004–2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233:1742–1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Huijskens EG, Koopmans M, Palmen FM, et al. The value of signs and symptoms in differentiating between bacterial, viral and mixed aetiology in patients with community‐acquired pneumonia. J Med Microbiol 2014;63:441–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cilloniz C, Ewig S, Polverino E, et al. Community‐acquired pneumonia in outpatients: Aetiology and outcomes. Eur Respir J 2012;40:931–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Johansson N, Kalin M, Hedlund J. Clinical impact of combined viral and bacterial infection in patients with community‐acquired pneumonia. Scand J Infect Dis 2011;43:609–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Johnstone J, Majumdar SR, Fox JD, Marrie TJ. Viral infection in adults hospitalized with community‐acquired pneumonia: Prevalence, pathogens, and presentation. Chest 2008;134:1141–1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Angeles Marcos M, Camps M, Pumarola T, et al. The role of viruses in the aetiology of community‐acquired pneumonia in adults. Antivir Ther 2006;11:351–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Garbino J, Soccal PM, Aubert JD, et al. Respiratory viruses in bronchoalveolar lavage: A hospital‐based cohort study in adults. Thorax 2009;64:399–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Luyt CE, Kaiser L. Virus detection in patients with severe pneumonia: Still more questions than answers? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:301–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Randolph JF, Moise NS, Scarlett JM, et al. Prevalence of mycoplasmal and ureaplasmal recovery from tracheobronchial lavages and prevalence of mycoplasmal recovery from pharyngeal swab specimens in dogs with or without pulmonary disease. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:387–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Erles K, Brownlie J. Canine respiratory coronavirus: An emerging pathogen in the canine infectious respiratory disease complex. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2008;38:815–825, viii. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Respiratory sampling technique, information on prior antimicrobial treatment as well as the Gram stain, culture and PCR results for individual dogs (n = 20) with bacterial pneumonia.


Articles from Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES