Molecular Typing of Hospital-Acquired Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens that cause hospital- and community-acquired infections in the world. The use of molecular typing methods is essential for determining the origin of the strains, their clonal relations, and also in epidemiological investigations. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistant S. aureus isolates and using spa, agr, and SCCmec typing to determine the dominant types in Iran. Material and Method. Fifty isolates of S. aureus were collected from January to May 2010. S. aureus identification was performed by biochemical tests. Disk diffusion method was employed to assess the sensitivity of S. aureus strains to antibiotics and then genetic analysis of bacteria was performed using SCCmec, agr, and spa typing. Results. S. aureus resistance to tetracycline, cefoxitin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, Cot: cotrimoxazole, levofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin were found to be 36%, 18%, 12%, 12%, 22%, 6%, 6%, and 0%, respectively. The results of this study showed that 16% of the isolates were resistant to methicillin (MRSA) and the majority of isolates were SSC mec type IV. In addition spa and agr typing revealed agr typeI and spa type t7688 to be the most predominant. Conclusion. In this study, spa typing showed 100% reliability and the t7688 spa type had a frequency of 26% compared to the frequency of 0.0% in the Ridom SpaServer. The frequency of t304 spa type was higher than the global average.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most prevalent pathogens that cause both community and nosocomial acquired infections and can produce a wide variety of diseases from skin surface infections, such as folliculitis and furunculosis, to life threating conditions, such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and septicemia [1–3]. The expression of many virulence factors in S. aureus is under control of the agr system and to date four major agr types in S. aureus have been recognized [4, 5]. Resistance to methicillin is due to mecA gene that is part of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome. This gene encodes the protein PBP2A (protein binding to penicillin) that inhibits the action of β-lactam antibiotics. SCCmec elements have been classified into eight different types (I–VIII) and some of them are divided further into subtypes [6, 7]. The increasing antibiotic resistance in this bacterium is a major concern that underlines the importance of the use of efficient typing methods for monitoring and limiting the spread of epidemic clones between hospitals [1, 8, 9]. Of the various molecular methods, PFGE, due to its high differentiation potential, was considered the gold standard for strain typing of S. aureus. However since it is time consuming, expensive, complicated, and difficult to standardize among different laboratories, DNA sequence-based methods have become increasingly popular during the recent years [10, 11]. Genetic analysis of strain types of S. aureus can be performed by spa sequence typing. The spa gene (approximately 2150 bp) is composed of three regions, namely, the fc protein, the x region, and the c terminal. The spa typing is based on sequencing of the polymorphic x region of protein A and depends on PCR amplification of this hypervariable region. The x region is composed of a variable number of 24 base pair repeats which may differ by spontaneous mutation or deletion and duplication of the repeats. Each repeat is attributed to one alpha-numerical code and the spa type is derived from the order of specific repeats [12–14]. It can be useful in describing the natural population of S. aureus strains as well as in outbreak investigations. However sometimes similar or related spa types are located in different clonal lineage which limits the discriminating power of this method [8]. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistant S. aureus isolates and the use of spa, agr, and SCCmec typing to determine the dominant types in Iran.

2. Material and Method

Fifty isolates of S. aureus were collected from clinical samples of patients who referred to Isfahan's Alzahra hospital (Iran) from January to May 2010. These isolates were obtained from different clinical sources including wound, blood, urine, and sputum. S. aureus identification was performed by standard tests including gram staining, catalase, DNase, mannitol fermentation, slide, and tube coagulase. Thereafter they were classified as community-acquired (CA-MRSA) or hospital-acquired (HA-MRSA) based on the patients recorded data.

2.1. Susceptibility Test

The susceptibility of S. aureus isolates to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [15]. The antibiotics utilized were as follows: vancomycin, tetracycline, gentamicin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, cefoxitin, levofloxacin, and cotrimoxazol. S. aureus strain ATCC25923 was used as a control strain for the quality control of antibiotic susceptibility testing.

2.2. Molecular Detection of mecA Gene

DNA extraction was performed from all isolates using Fermentas DNA kit in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. PCR was performed for the detection of mecA gene using primers displayed in Table 1. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation, 94°C for 5 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 57°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

Table 1.

Primers used in this study.

Target	Primer	Sequence	Product size (bp)	Reference
mecA	F	AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC	533	[2]
	R	AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTG
SCCmec	βF	ATTGCCTTGATAATAGCCYTCT	937	[3]
	α3R	TAAAGGCATCAATGCACAAACACT
	ccrCF	CGTCTATTACAAGATGTTAAGGATAAT
	ccrCR	CCTTTATAGACTGGATTATTCAAAATAT	518
	1272F1	GCCACTCATAACATATGGAA
	1272R1	CATCCGAGTGAAACCCAAA	1415
	5RmecA	TATACCAAACCCGACAACTAC
	5R431	CGGCTACAGTGATAACATCC	359
Agr	PanF	ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC		[20]
	RI	GTCACAAGTACTATAAGCTGCGAT	439
	RII	GTATTACTAATTGAAAAGTGCCATAGC	572
	RIII	CTGTTGAAAAAGTCAACTAAAAGCTC	406
	RI V	CGATAATGCCGTAATACCCG	659
Spa	1113F	TAAAGACGATCCTTCGGTGAGC	Variable	[22]
	1514R	CAGCAGTAGTGCCGTTTGCTT

2.3. Multiplex PCR for SCCmec and Agr Typing

SCCmec typing for 9 isolates resistant to methicillin (MRSA) was determined by multiplex PCR method. Primers shown in Table 1 were used for this purpose. The PCR protocol comprised an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 4 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing step at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 60 s and a final extension step at 72°C for 4 min. Agr typing was also performed on all isolates of S. aureus using primers shown in Table 1. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40 s, annealing at 60°C for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for 60 s and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

2.4. Spa Typing

The polymorphic X region of the spa gene was amplified from all S. aureus isolates using the spa primers exhibited in Table 1. All sequencing reactions were performed at Bioneer (Korea) and then the data were analyzed using MEGA 4 software. Finally, spa types were assigned by Ridom SpaServer (http://spaserver.ridom.de) [12].

3. Results

In the present study, from January to May 2010, 50 isolates of S. aureus from various clinical specimens including wound (38%), septicemia (26%), UTI (18%), pneumonia (10%), and others (2%) were collected from Alzahra Hospital in Isfahan.

In this study, antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by disk diffusion method. S. aureus resistance to tetracycline, cotrimoxazol, cefoxitin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin was 36%, 22%, 18%, 12%, 12%, 10%, 6%, 6%, and 0%, respectively. In our study, presence of mecA gene in all isolates were evaluated by susceptibility test and then confirmed by PCR. Of the 50 S. aureus isolates, 8 (16%) were MRSA and mecA positive. To determine the type of MRSA isolates, SCCmec typing was performed in which 4 (44.4%) were found to be SCCmec type IV, 2 (22.2%) were SCCmec type III, and 2 (22.2%) were SCCmec type I. Agr typing results revealed that 45 (90%) isolates were agr type I, 2 (4%) were agr type III, and 3 (6%) were nontypeable. Ultimately, typing of 50 isolates of S. aureus was performed using spa typing method. Genotyping of spa gene revealed 22 different spa types with Spa type t7688 (26%) being the most frequent and other types with the following frequencies: t304 (10%), t037 (8%), t005 (8%), t230 (8%), t024 (6%), and t4892 (4%). Spa types including t352, t8015, t937, t138, t436, t439, t045, t2790, t084, t1741, t267, t021, t7685, t5005, and t275 were found only once among the isolates (Table 2).

Table 2.

Correlation between the different molecular typing methods.

Strain	Sample	spa type	agr type	mecA gene	Sccmec type	PVL gene1	Antimicrobial resistance2, 3
1	Wound	t230	I	−	−	−	−
2	Septicemia	t230	I	−	−	+	−
3	Septicemia	t024	I	−	−	−	−
4	Septicemia	t304	I	−	−	−	tet
5	Urine	t304	I	−	−	−	tet
6	Wound	t4892	I	−	−	+	cot
7	Wound	t024	I	−	−	−	−
8	Wound	t304	I	−	−	−	−
9	CSF	t2790	I	−	−	−	−
10	Wound	t304	I	−	−	+	tet
11	Wound	t024	I	−	−	+	−
12	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	+	tet
13	Blood	t045	I	−	−	+	−
14	Sputum	t005	I	+	IV	+	cx
15	Blood	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
16	Urine	t439	I	−	−	−	−
17	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	−	cx
18	Wound	t005	I	+	I	−	cx
19	Urine	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
20	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	+	−
21	Blood	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
22	Blood	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
23	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
24	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	+	−
25	Urine	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
26	Wound	t230	I	−	−	−	−
27	Blood	t230	I	−	−	−	−
28	Sputum	t005	I	−	−	−	−
29	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
30	Wound	t7688	I	−	−	+	−
31	CSF	t7688	I	−	−	−	−
32	Sputum	t4892	I	−	−	−	−
33	Urine	t304	I	+	I	−	cx
34	Wound	t138	I	+	III	+	cx, cot
35	Wound	t037	I	+	III	−	Cip, gen, cd, tet, le, rif, cx, cot
36	Perituen	t037	III	+	IV	−	Cip, gen, cd, tet, le, cx, cot
37	Urine	t937	I	−	−	−	Cip, gen, cd, tet, le
38	Wound	t436	I	−	−	−	gen, cd, tet, cx
39	Wound	t8015	III	−	−	−	gen, cd, tet, cx
40	Abscess	t037	I	+	IV	−	Cip, gen, cd, tet, rif, cx, cot
41	Blood	t352	I	−	−	−	tet, rif, cx
42	Sputum	t084	I	−	−	−	tet, cot
43	Urine	t1741	−	−	−	−	tet
44	Sputum	t005	I	−	−	−	−
45	Wound	t037	I	−	−	−	tet, cot
46	Blood	t267	I	−	−	−	Cip, tet, cot
47	Urine	t021	−	−	−	−	tet
48	Blood	t7685	I	−	−	−	Cip, tet
49	Blood	t5005	I	−	−	−	tet
50	Wound	t275	I	−	−	−	−

¹PVL: Panton-Valentine Leukocidin.

²Oxa: oxacillin, Lev: levofloxacin, Cip: ciprofloxacin, Tet: tetracycline, Cot: cotrimoxazole, Gen: gentamycin, Cli: clindamycin, Rif: rifampicin.

³No resistance was observed for vancomycin and minocycline.

4. Discussion

S. aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is one of the most common causes of infection both in the community and in hospitals. Due to its diverse pathogenicity and high antibiotic resistance, drug therapy has been problematic causing great burdens for patients and healthcare providers. Molecular typing of this bacterium is therefore essential to determine the origin of the strains, its clonal relations, and for epidemiological investigations, playing an important role in the prevention and treatment of infections [16]. In this study, we investigated the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus to tetracycline, cefoxitin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, cotrimoxazol, levofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin using disk diffusion method. Resistance of S. aureus to antibiotics was as follows: tetracycline 36%, cefoxitin 18%, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin 12%, gentamicin 10%, cotrimoxazol 22%, levofloxacin and rifampin 6%, and 0% to vancomycin. Resistance rates found in this study were lower than the global average [5, 17, 18].

Several different phenotypic and genotypic methods can be employed for classifying strains used in epidemiological investigations, and for detection and monitoring nosocomial outbreaks. In the current study, we used SCCmec, agr, and spa typing for this purpose [18, 19]. Our results revealed that 16% of the isolates were MRSA and mecA positive. MRSA classification requires a thorough understanding of their genetic structure as well as detection of all SCCmec types and carriers of the mecA gene. SCCmec typing provides important information about the movable genetic components responsible for resistance to methicillin and it is a marker for differentiation between HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA strains [6, 9, 19]. SCCmec typing was performed on MRSA isolates in which 4 (44.4%) were SCCmec type IV (2 of them were related to t037 spa type and agr types I and III, and the other two isolates were t325 and t005 spa types and agr type I), 2 (22.2%) were SCCmec type III (related to t037 and t138 spa types and agr type I), and 2 (22.2%) were SCCmec type I (related to t005 and t304 spa types and agr type I). The high frequency of SCCmec types IV compared to other SCCmec types may be due to their small size that facilitates their spread among S. aureus strains [6]. In our study, 3 isolates with SCCmec type IV belonged to HA-MRSA, whereas types IV and V were shown to belong to CA-MRSA. As expected, in this study we have shown 4 isolates related to SCCmec I and III which belong to HA-MRSA [9]. Similar results were shown by Vindel et al. [17].

In agreement with previous reports from Iran, the majority 45(90%) of the isolates were agr I, 3 (6%) were agr III, and 2 (4%) were nontypeable [4, 5] Similar to many previous studies, the agr type IV was absent in our study [2, 20].

Spa typing is an effective molecular typing technique based on sequencing of only single locus of S. aureus and has advantages such as rapidity, ease, and convenience of interpreting the results and exchangeability of results among laboratories and creates a global database based on spa typing for national and international control of S. aureus.

The use of spa typing in our study revealed 22 different spa types where Spa type t7688 (26%) was the most frequent followed by Spa type t304. Its global prevalence has been shown to be 0.32% in different countries including Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Iceland, Sweden, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Lebanon, Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, and Spain (http://spaserver.ridom.de), whereas the frequency of this type was higher (10%) in our study. In addition the frequency of spa t304 has been found to be higher than that reported in previous studies in Iran [21].

Spa types t037, t005, and t230 have been isolated from different parts of the world [1, 8, 21]. However, in our study each one was 8% and Spa types t024 and t4892 were 6% and 4%, respectively. Other spa types including t325, t267, t021, t275, t7685, t045, t005, t439, t138, t937, t436, t8015, t325, t084, t1741, and t5005 were found only once among the isolates. In a study by Wiśniewska et al. the prevalent spa types in Poland were reported to be t003, t151, and t008 [9]. Neela et al. showed that Spa type t037 and SCCmecIII were prevalent in Malaysia [22]. Tokajian et al. found Spa types t044 and t037 and SCCmec IV as the prevalent types in Lebanon [18]. The use of molecular typing in Spain revealed Spa types t067 and t002, agr II, and SCCmec IV to be dominant [17]. In a study conducted by Emaneini et al. Spa type t7685 was shown to be prevalent in Iran [21]. There seems to be a geographical difference in the distribution of various spa types.

5. Conclusion

Overall in the current study, spa typing showed 100% type ability. An interesting point to note was the dominance of Spa type t7688 which has been only reported from Iran to date. Moreover the spa types of t084 and t037 are associated with the top ten spa types worldwide between MRSA and MSSA isolates in which t037 is one of the prevalent types in Asian countries. It is our understanding that the current results will aid in the characterization of S. aureus in neighboring countries. We suggest the use of additional typing methods such as BURP and MLST to overcome the limitation of a single locus-based molecular typing (spa typing).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.