Abstract
A collision induced dissociation (CID) structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM) module is introduced and coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (MS). The SLIM CID module was mounted after an ion mobility (IM) drift tube to enable IM/CID/MS studies. The efficiency of CID was studied by using the model peptide leucine enkephalin. CID efficiencies (62%) compared favorably to other beam-type CID methods. Additionally, the SLIM CID module was used to fragment a mixture of 9 peptides after IM separation. This work also represents the first application of SLIM in the 0.3 to 0.5 Torr pressure regime, an order of magnitude lower in pressure than previously studied.
Keywords: Collision Induced Dissociation, Ion mobility spectrometry, RF Confinement, ion optics, peptide fragmentation, manipulation, conveyor
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Collision induced dissociation (CID) is ubiquitous in mass spectrometry (MS). Since the advent of widely used “soft” ionization methods (viz. electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)[1, 2]), CID has been invaluable for proteomics identification[3–8] and quantitation[9–11]. An important CID figure of merit is the CID efficiency (ECID; Equation 1)
| (1) |
where Iproduct is product ion intensity and I0 is the initial precursor ion intensity. CID efficiency can also be calculated as the product of fragmentation efficiency (Equation 2) and collection efficiency (Equation 3).
| (2) |
| (3) |
where Iprecursor is remaining precursor ion intensity.
Previously, fragmentation techniques, such as photodissociation[12], surface-induced dissociation[13, 14], and collision-induced dissociation[15–22] have been coupled to IMS for mobility-separated fragmentation of precursor ions. Fragment ions will retain the arrival ions of their respective precursors, provided the fragmentation occurs after the IM separation. In addition, recent reports have also demonstrated IM-selection for action spectroscopy [23, 24]. In this work, we introduce a new structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM) CID module for CID/MS. SLIM devices have been previously demonstrated for ion mobility (IM) separations[25–28], mobility-based ion selection[29], and ion trapping[30]. In this study, we demonstrate that SLIM is adaptable (and highly suitable) to applications outside of IM. We also show that SLIM devices are not limited to ~4 Torr and can provide effective ion transmission at lower pressures. The SLIM CID module was used to dissociate ions after an IM stage, providing fragmentation precursor peptides after a mobility separation. In this work we used the well-studied ESI thermometer ion, leucine enkephalin[31], as well as a mixture of nine peptides, to evaluate the effectiveness of the SLIM CID module.
Experimental Arrangement
Leucine enkephalin was prepared in a 1 μM solution of 50/50/1 (vol/vol/vol) water/methanol/acetic acid. An equimolar 1 μM/each solution of 9 peptides (angiotensin I & II, bradykinin, fibrinopeptide A, kemptide, melittin, neurotensin, renin substrate tetradecapeptide, and substance P) was also prepared in 50/50/1 water/methanol/acetic acid. Water was purified by a Barnstead Nanopure set to 18 MΩ resistivity (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA), peptides were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), and methanol and acetic acid were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Solutions were infused at 300 nl/min from a chemically etched emitter nanoelectrospray source[32] into a home-built IM/MS[21, 33, 34]. The design of the SLIM module, shown in Figure 1, was based upon previous designs used for ion mobility separations[25] and other manipulations.[35, 36] Briefly, ions are confined laterally using DC from ‘guard’ electrodes and vertically by pseudopotentials generated by RF applied in opposite phase to each adjacent electrode. The DC/RF electrodes have a superimposed DC gradient applied across a section of electrode such that ions will experience a constant electric field and traverse the device from high to low DC potentials (left to right in Figure 1). Two SLIM surfaces fabricated from PCBs are then mounted parallel to each other. The DC-only guards are black in Figure 1, and electrodes with both DC and RF are red. There are three independently controllable DC regions on the device. The first two regions (gradient 1 and 2) each span 11 DC-only guard electrodes and the final region contains a planar quadrupole-like geometry (exit region) to focus ions into the center of the device for entrance into the mass spectrometer (Agilent 6538 QTOF MS with a 1.5 m flight tube, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Therefore, higher electric fields suitable for CID can be applied across two regions: between the first two gradients and between the second gradient and quadrupole-like region. The DC fields in the gradients were restricted to a maximum of 15–16 V/cm, so that fragmentation was minimized when CID fields were not applied. The guards in the first two regions were biased 10 VDC higher than the neighboring RF/DC electrodes. All three electrodes in the exit region were biased to the same VDC. For IM/CID/MS, ions were accumulated in the ion funnel trap[37–39] and released into the drift tube (4 Torr, 16 V/cm constant field) in 488 μs pulses. The drift tube was followed by a rear ion funnel with a conductance limiting orifice, a short rf-only transmission quad, another conductance limiting orifice, and the SLIM CID module. Therefore, the pressure in the SLIM region could be varied without affecting the drift tube pressure.
Figure 1.
Layout of electrodes on one of the two planar SLIM surfaces. Black (guard) electrodes are DC-only, and red electrodes are RF/DC. The DC was divided into two separate gradients of equal length, followed by an independently controlled DC for the planar pseudo-quadrupole region at the exit, where RF on the guard electrodes is the same phase and the RF on the central electrode is 180 out of phase with respect to the guards. Ions traverse the SLIM module from left to right.
Results
Leucine enkephalin was chosen as a model peptide for fragmentation as the fragmentation patterns are widely documented and understood[31]. Figure 2 shows representative spectra of protonated leucine enkephalin. The DC voltage in Figure 2a between the end of gradient 2 and the exit region (VCID) was 0 V. Applying a VCID of 30 V (Figure 2b) results in extensive fragmentation, including cleavage of all peptide bonds (y4, b2, b3, and b4). The CID efficiency was 62%, comparing favorably to efficiencies in a triple-quadrupole and for 200 mTorr in a segmented quadrupole CID (36% in both cases)[21], and dipolar resonant excitation CID of methionine enkephalin at 80 mTorr (44%)[33].
Figure 2.
Representative spectra of protonated leucine enkephalin at 265 mTorr, 750 kHz, 200 Vp-p RF. (a) VCID = 0. (b) VCID = 30, CID efficiency = 62%.
Next, the CID efficiencies from applying VCID between gradient 1/gradient 2 and gradient 2/exit region were measured (Supplemental Figure 1). VDC was increased for each case until the fragmentation efficiency remained roughly constant (Equation 2). The maximum CID efficiency from gradient 2/exit region CID was 62% (30 VCID). The maximum efficiency when VCID was applied between gradient 1 and 2 was 50% (20 VCID). The fragmentation efficiency for VCID between gradient 2 and the exit region was 80% and between gradient 1 and gradient 2 was 84%. Therefore, the increase in CID efficiency for application of VCID in between gradient 2 and the exit region was due to increased collection efficiency (77% versus 60%). Although both methods are equally efficient with the application of 20 VCID, the collection efficiency was 60% between gradient 1 and 2 and 81% between gradient 2 and the exit region. Changes in collection efficiency are likely due to stronger ion focusing of product ions in the quadrupolar region than the RF/DC region, where ions move in closer proximity to surfaces[26, 27].
Figure 3 shows two nested IM/MS spectra of a 9 peptide mix. Figure 3A was taken with 0 VCID, and Figure 3B was taken with a 45 VCID potential between gradient 2 and the exit region. After the application of CID, characteristic dissociation “ladder” patterns appear in the nested spectra. The product ions in the nested spectra appear vertically aligned with the arrival time of the precursor. Extensive dissociation was observed, showing the utility of IM/SLIM CID for ’all-ion’ fragmentation.
Figure 3.
Nested IM/MS spectra of a mix of 9 peptides at 365 mTorr, 750 kHz, 200 Vp-p RF. (a) 0 VCID (b) 45 VCID.
Conclusions
We have introduced a CID-capable SLIM module including two CID regions. The most efficient CID was observed when the VCID was applied between the second voltage gradient and the exit region. SLIM CID resulted in extensive fragmentation of the thermometer peptide ion protonated leucine enkephalin. SLIM CID coupled to an IM separation was exemplified with all-ion fragmentation of a mixture of peptides. In the future, SLIM CID will be coupled to high resolution SLIM IM separations to give higher peak capacities and direct connectivity of precursor ions to product ions without requiring mass selections for data-independent analysis experiments. Additionally, this study showed the ability of SLIM devices to transmit ions at lower pressures than pressures used in previous studies (i.e. 4 Torr). Present work is ongoing to optimize SLIM CID for higher pressures for more direct coupling to IM measurements without losses of resolving power or sensitivity due to changes in pressure. Once SLIM CID is integrated into existing SLIM modules, slower heating trapping/longer activation time experiments can be performed which will allow for higher CID efficiencies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Portions of this research were supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIGMS grant 5P41GM103493-13 (R.D.S.), by the Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research Genome Sciences Program under the Pan-omics project, and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD, I.K.W. and E.S.B.) program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Work was performed in the Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national scientific user facility at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, WA. PNNL is operated by Battelle for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-76RL0 1830.
References
- 1.Kebarle P, Verkerk UH. Electrospray: from ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2009;28:898–917. doi: 10.1002/mas.20247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Duncan MW, Roder H, Hunsucker SW. Quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics. 2008;7:355–370. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/eln041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferguson PL, Smith RD. Proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure. 2003;32:399–424. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang Y, Fonslow BR, Shan B, Baek MC, Yates JR. 3rd: Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. Chemical reviews. 2013;113:2343–2394. doi: 10.1021/cr3003533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Michalski A, Damoc E, Lange O, Denisov E, Nolting D, Muller M, Viner R, Schwartz J, Remes P, Belford M, Dunyach JJ, Cox J, Horning S, Mann M, Makarov A. Ultra high resolution linear ion trap Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Elite) facilitates top down LC MS/MS and versatile peptide fragmentation modes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11 doi: 10.1074/mcp.O111.013698. O111 013698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McLafferty FW, Breuker K, Jin M, Han XM, Infusini G, Jiang H, Kong XL, Begley TP. Top-down MS, a powerful complement to the high capabilities of proteolysis proteomics. Febs J. 2007;274:6256–6268. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Breuker K, Jin M, Han X, Jiang H, McLafferty FW. Top-down identification and characterization of biomolecules by mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2008;19:1045–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wells JM, McLuckey SA. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) of peptides and proteins. Methods in enzymology. 2005;402:148–185. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)02005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Picotti P, Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat Methods. 2012;9:555–566. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peterson AC, Russell JD, Bailey DJ, Westphall MS, Coon JJ. Parallel reaction monitoring for high resolution and high mass accuracy quantitative, targeted proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:1475–1488. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O112.020131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, Rost H, Selevsek N, Reiter L, Bonner R, Aebersold R. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:O111 016717. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McLean JA, Gillig KJ, Ruotolo BT, Ugarov MV, Bensaoula H, Egan TF, Schultz JA, Russell DH. Ion Mobility-Photodissociation (213 nm)-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Simultaneous Peptide Mass Mapping and Peptide Seuencing. Proceedings of the 51st ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Applied Topics; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stone E, Gillig KJ, Ruotolo B, Fuhrer K, Gonin M, Schultz A, Russell DH. Surface-induced dissociation on a MALDI-ion mobility-orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer: sequencing peptides from an “in-solution” protein digest. Anal Chem. 2001;73:2233–2238. doi: 10.1021/ac001430a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stone EG, Gillig KJ, Ruotolo BT, Russell DH. Optimization of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-ion mobility-surface-induced dissociation-orthogonal-time-of-flight mass spectrometer: simultaneous acquisition of multiple correlated MS1 and MS2 spectra. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2001;212:519–533. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee YJ, Hoaglund-Hyzer CS, Taraszka JA, Zientara GA, Counterman AE, Clemmer DE. Collision-induced dissociation of mobility-separated ions using an orifice-skimmer cone at the back of a drift tube. Anal Chem. 2001;73:3549–3555. doi: 10.1021/ac010295e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fernandez-Lima FA, Becker C, Gillig KJ, Russell WK, Tichy SE, Russell DH. Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer Interface for Collisional Activation of Mobility Separated Ions. Anal Chem. 2009;81:618–624. doi: 10.1021/ac801919n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Giles K, Pringle SD, Worthington KR, Little D, Wildgoose JL, Bateman RH. Applications of a travelling wave-based radio-frequency only stacked ring ion guide. Rapid Commun Mass Sp. 2004;18:2401–2414. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Valentine SJ, Koeniger SL, Clemmer DE. A split-field drift tube for separation and efficient fragmentation of biomolecular ions. Anal Chem. 2003;75:6202–6208. doi: 10.1021/ac030111r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pringle SD, Giles K, Wildgoose JL, Williams JP, Slade SE, Thalassinos K, Bateman RH, Bowers MT, Scrivens JH. An investigation of the mobility separation of some peptide and protein ions using a new hybrid quadrupole/travelling wave IMS/oa-ToF instrument. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2007;261:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Baker ES, Tang KQ, Danielson WF, Prior DC, Smith RD. Simultaneous fragmentation of multiple ions using IMS drift time dependent collision energies. J Am Soc Mass Spectr. 2008;19:411–419. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ibrahim YM, Prior DC, Baker ES, Smith RD, Belov ME. Characterization of an ion mobility-multiplexed collision-induced dissociation-tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry approach. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2010;293:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Webb IK, Chen TC, Danielson WF, Ibrahim YM, Tang KQ, Anderson GA, Smith RD. Implementation of Dipolar Resonant Excitation for Collision Induced Dissociation with Ion Mobility/Time-of-Flight MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectr. 2014;25:563–571. doi: 10.1007/s13361-013-0815-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adamson BD, Coughlan NJ, Markworth PB, Continetti RE, Bieske EJ. An ion mobility mass spectrometer for investigating photoisomerization and photodissociation of molecular ions. Rev Sci Instrum. 2014;85:123109. doi: 10.1063/1.4903753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Masson A, Kamrath MZ, Perez MA, Glover MS, Rothlisberger U, Clemmer DE, Rizzo TR. Infrared Spectroscopy of Mobility-Selected H+-Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly (GPGG) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2015;26:1444–1454. doi: 10.1007/s13361-015-1172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Webb IK, Garimella SVB, Tolmachev AV, Chen TC, Zhang XY, Norheim RV, Prost SA, LaMarche B, Anderson GA, Ibrahim YM, Smith RD. Experimental Evaluation and Optimization of Structures for Loss less Ion Manipulations for Ion Mobility Spectrometry with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2014;86:9169–9176. doi: 10.1021/ac502055e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tolmachev AV, Webb IK, Ibrahim YM, Garimella SV, Zhang X, Anderson GA, Smith RD. Characterization of ion dynamics in structures for lossless ion manipulations. Anal Chem. 2014;86:9162–9168. doi: 10.1021/ac502054p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Garimella SV, Ibrahim YM, Webb IK, Tolmachev AV, Zhang X, Prost SA, Anderson GA, Smith RD. Simulation of electric potentials and ion motion in planar electrode structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2014;25:1890–1896. doi: 10.1007/s13361-014-0976-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hamid AM, Ibrahim YM, Garimella SV, Webb IK, Deng L, Chen TC, Anderson GA, Prost SA, Norheim RV, Tolmachev AV, Smith RD. Characterization of Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Separations in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Anal Chem. 2015;87:11301–11308. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Garimella SV, Ibrahim YM, Webb IK, Ipsen AB, Chen TC, Tolmachev AV, Baker ES, Anderson GA, Smith RD. Ion manipulations in structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM): computational evaluation of a 90 degrees turn and a switch. Analyst. 2015;140:6845–6852. doi: 10.1039/c5an00844a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang X, Garimella SV, Prost SA, Webb IK, Chen TC, Tang K, Tolmachev AV, Norheim RV, Baker ES, Anderson GA, Ibrahim YM, Smith RD. Ion Trapping, Storage, and Ejection in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Anal Chem. 2015;87:6010–6016. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sztaray J, Memboeuf A, Drahos L, Vekey K. Leucine Enkephalin-a Mass Spectrometry Standard. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2011;30:298–320. doi: 10.1002/mas.20279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kelly RT, Page JS, Luo Q, Moore RJ, Orton DJ, Tang K, Smith RD. Chemically etched open tubular and monolithic emitters for nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2006;78:7796–7801. doi: 10.1021/ac061133r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Webb IK, Chen TC, Danielson WF, 3rd, Ibrahim YM, Tang K, Anderson GA, Smith RD. Implementation of dipolar resonant excitation for collision induced dissociation with ion mobility/time-of-flight MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2014;25:563–571. doi: 10.1007/s13361-013-0815-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baker ES, Clowers BH, Li FM, Tang K, Tolmachev AV, Prior DC, Belov ME, Smith RD. Ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry performance using electrodynamic ion funnels and elevated drift gas pressures. J Am Soc Mass Spectr. 2007;18:1176–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Webb IK, Garimella SVB, Tolmachev AV, Chen TC, Zhang XY, Cox JT, Norheim RV, Prost SA, LaMarche B, Anderson GA, Ibrahim YM, Smith RD. Mobility-Resolved Ion Selection in Uniform Drift Field Ion Mobility Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry: Dynamic Switching in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Anal Chem. 2014;86:9632–9637. doi: 10.1021/ac502139e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang XY, Garimella SVB, Prost SA, Webb IK, Chen TC, Tang KQ, Tolmachev AV, Norheim RV, Baker ES, Anderson GA, Ibrahim YM, Smith RD. Ion Trapping, Storage, and Ejection in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Anal Chem. 2015;87:6010–6016. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Clowers BH, Ibrahim YM, Prior DC, Danielson WF, Belov ME, Smith RD. Enhanced ion utilization efficiency using an electrodynamic ion funnel trap as an injection mechanism for ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2008;80:612–623. doi: 10.1021/ac701648p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ibrahim Y, Belov ME, Tolmachev AV, Prior DC, Smith RD. Ion funnel trap interface for orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2007;79:7845–7852. doi: 10.1021/ac071091m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ibrahim YM, Belov ME, Liyu AV, Smith RD. Automated gain control ion funnel trap for orthogonal time-offlight mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2008;80:5367–5376. doi: 10.1021/ac8003488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



