Abstract
Tissue-mimicking phantoms are employed for the assessment of shocked histotripsy pulses in vitro. These broadband shockwaves are critical for tissue ablation, and are influenced by the frequency-dependent attenuation of the medium. The density, sound speed, and attenuation spectra (2–25 MHz) were measured for phantoms that mimic key histotripsy targets. The influence of nonlinear propagation relative to the attenuation was described in terms of the Gol’dberg number. An expression was derived to estimate the bandwidth of shocked histotripsy pulses for power law-dependent attenuation. The expression is independent of the fundamental frequency of the histotripsy pulse for linear frequency-dependent attenuation.
Keywords: Histotripsy, shockwaves, ultrasonic attenuation, acoustical properties, cavitation
Introduction
Histotripsy is a focused ultrasound therapy that fractionates tissue mechanically through microbubble cloud formation (Xu et al. 2004). Microbubble clouds form through scattering of the shocked histotripsy pulse from a nucleated cavity at the focus combined with constructive interference with the incident shockwave (Maxwell et al. 2011). The degree of shockwave formation is influenced by the frequency-dependent attenuation of the medium (Hamilton and Blackstock 1998). Recent studies by Maruvada et al. (2015) indicate that accurate measurements of the frequency dependence of attenuation are critical for prediction of focused ultrasound fields. The bandwidth used for attenuation measurements of tissue and tissue-mimicking materials is typically less than 10 MHz (Bamber and Hill 1979; Duck 1990; Lin et al. 1987; Madsen et al. 1978), much less than the bandwidth of the shocked histotripsy pulse (Parsons et al. 2006).
The objective of this study was to ascertain the influence of frequency-dependent attenuation on the bandwidth of shocked histotripsy pulses. An insertion loss method was used to measure the frequency-dependent attenuation (2–25 MHz) for types of tissue-mimicking phantoms. Prostate and liver mimicking phantoms were manufactured following Madsen et al. (1998). An agar phantom used for in vitro assessment of histotripsy was manufactured following Maxwell et al. (2010). Density, sound speed, and frequency-dependent attenuation were measured for each phantom. The influence of nonlinear propagation relative to the attenuation was analyzed in terms of the Gol’dberg number for each phantom material. An expression was derived to estimate the bandwidth of shocked histotripsy pulses for power law-dependent attenuation.
Methods and Materials
Production of phantoms
Attenuation measurements were made for only tissue mimicking materials in this study. All three types of phantoms were composed of agar, n-propanol, and evaporated milk. The ratio of these components is reported in Table 1 for each phantom. For the prostate and liver phantoms, commercially available evaporated milk (Meijer Brand, Meijer, Inc., Grand Rapids, MI) was filtered (pore size 100 μm), and gently stirred on a hot plate to reach a final temperature of 55°C. Agar powder (A9539 Sigma-Aldrich Co. St. Louis, MO) was dissolved into 0.2 μm filtered, deionized water (NANOPure, Barnstead International, Dubuque, IA, USA) and n-propanol solution by heating in 30 s increments in a standard microwave until clear. The heated solution was then placed in a heated (50°C) ultrasonic cleaning bath for 30 min while continuously evacuating at 2 kPa. The degassed agar/n-propanol solution was combined with the heated evaporated milk, poured into a mold, and allowed to solidify at 5°C. Agar phantoms were manufactured in a similar fashion, but without the addition of evaporated milk or n-propanol. The phantoms were made in triplicate (N=3) for each measurement.
Table 1.
Component | Prostate phantom | Liver phantom | Agar phantom |
---|---|---|---|
deionized water (18-MΩ) | 147.2 mL | 184 mL | 400 mL |
Agarose | 3.7 g | 2 g | 6 g |
n-propanol | 12.8 mL | 16 mL | — |
evaporated milk | 240 mL | 200 mL | — |
Density and sound speed measurements
The phantom mass was measured using a standard laboratory balance (AE100, Mettler-Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA), and the volume was measured using a water displacement technique (Hughes 2005). The phantom density was calculated as the mass divided by the volume. The sound speed of each of the three phantoms were measured using a through-transmission substitution technique (Selfridge 1985; Zell et al. 2007).
Broadband attenuation measurements
The frequency-dependent attenuation spectra of the phantoms were measured using a broadband through-transmission technique (Marsh et al. 1997), as described in Raymond et al. (2013) Briefly, a pair of broadband polyvinylidene fluoride transducers (PI-20, Olympus NDT, Waltham, MA, USA) were employed to acquire the spectrum after passing through the phantom material. A pulser-receiver (Panametrics 5077 PR, Olympus NDT) generated the excitation pulse (pulse repetition frequency of 100 Hz) and amplified the received signal (25 dB gain).
The received waveforms were averaged (256 traces per acquisition) and digitized (LT572, LeCroy, Chestnut Ridge, NY, USA; 16 bits, 1-GHz sampling rate) for analysis offline. The frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient, α(f), was calculated as:
(1) |
Where Vref and VSample are the received amplitude spectra of the measured voltage-time waveforms through the water path and phantom sample, respectively. The phantom thickness, d, was adjusted to ensure optimal signal to noise over the bandwidth of the measurement. The frequency-dependent attenuation was fit in the least squares sense to a power law of the form
(2) |
where α0 and PL were fitting parameters, and f was frequency in MHz.
Predicted bandwidth of shockwave for frequency-dependent attenuation
The presence of high frequency components during shockwave formation of the histotripsy pulse depends on the degree of nonlinearity and attenuation of the medium. The influence of nonlinear propagation relative to the attenuation can be described in terms of the Gol’dberg number (Hamilton and Blackstock 1998), Γ:
(3) |
where β is the coefficient of nonlinearity, ρ is the medium density, c is the medium sound speed, p is the pressure amplitude, and α is the attenuation at frequency f. The amplitude of the mth harmonic of the fundamental frequency present in the shocked histotripsy pulse, Pm, can be expressed as (Hamilton and Blackstock 1998):
(4) |
where PSHOCK is the positive pressure of the histotripsy pulse. The Gol’dberg number of the mth harmonic of the shocked histotripsy pulse, Γm, is expressed by substituting eqns. (2) and (4) into eqn. (3):
(5) |
where f0 is the fundamental frequency of the histotripsy pulse. Harmonics with Γm less than 1 will be readily attenuated, and will not contribute to shockwave formation. Setting Γm equal to 1 in eqn. (5) and solving for m, the critical harmonic that will be readily attenuated, mcrit, can be expressed as:
(6) |
Results
Density and Sound Speed
The measured densities and sound speeds of each phantom are reported in Table 2. The prostate and liver phantoms had sound speeds of 1520 ± 30 m/s and 1530 ± 4 m/s, respectively. The agar phantom had a sound speed of 1500 ± 13 m/s. The nominal density of all the phantoms was 1.0 g/mL.
Table 2.
Material | Density [g/mL] |
Sound speed [m/s] |
α0 [dB cm−1 MHz−PL] |
PL [A.U.] |
r2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prostate phantom | 1.04 ± 0.03 | 1523 ± 30 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 0.999 |
0.46 ± 0.01 | 1 | 0.993 | |||
Liver phantom | 1.05 ± 0.03 | 1532 ± 4 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.01 | 0.999 |
0.41 ± 0.003 | 1 | 0.995 | |||
Agar phantom | 1.01 ± 0.07 | 1497 ± 13 | 0.02 ± 0.07 | 1.57 ± 0.01 | 0.999 |
0.09 ± 0.003 | 1 | 0.922 |
Attenuation Spectra
The frequency-dependent attenuation spectrum for each of the phantoms is shown in Figure 1a. The error bars represent the standard deviation (N = 3). The average attenuation spectra for each phantom were fit in the least-squares sense using the power law described by eqn. (2). Values for the fitting parameters in eqn. (2) are presented in Table 2. The power law fit for attenuation spectra agreed well with the measured attenuation spectra over the entire bandwidth of the measurement (Figure 1b), with a coefficient of determination greater than 0.99 for all three phantoms.
Measured attenuation spectra are typically assumed to have a linear frequency dependence (i.e. eqn. (2) with PL set to 1) (Duck 1990) over a bandwidth less than 10 MHz (Madsen et al. 1998). Attenuation spectra between 2 and 10 MHz were also fit to a linear power law (eqn. (2) with PL = 1). The best-fit slope parameter is also presented in Table 2. The linear fits agreed well with the measured data up to 10 MHz. However, the attenuation was underestimated at frequencies greater than 10 MHz (Figure 1b). The power law fit agreed well with the measured data over the entire 2 to 25 MHz measurement bandwidth.
Attenuation of Histotripsy Shockwave
The harmonic-dependent Gol’dberg number calculated via eqn. (5) is shown in Figure 2a for each phantom, assuming a 1 MHz fundamental frequency histotripsy pulse with a 80 MPa peak positive pressure (Maxwell et al. 2012). The attenuation variables α0 and PL used to evaluate eqn. (5) were the best-fit parameters for the power law fit for each of the phantoms (Table 2). The coefficient of nonlinearity was assumed to be 4.3 for the phantoms (Dong et al. 1999).
The critical harmonic was calculated for each of the phantoms using eqn. (6), and is shown in Figure 2b. For each of the phantoms, eqn. (6) was evaluated using best-fit parameters α0 and PL in Table 2 for power law and linear power law (PL = 1) attenuation. The linear power law for attenuation overestimates the bandwidth of the shockwave by 7 harmonics for the prostate and liver phantoms (PL ~ 1.1), but underestimates the number of harmonics by 48 for the agar phantom (PL = 1.57).
Discussion and Conclusions
The measured density and sound speed of these phantoms are similar to the target tissues (Fedewa et al. 2006; Mountford and Wells 1972; Parker et al. 1993; White et al. 1987), and are within an acceptable range for most soft tissue (D’Souza et al. 2001). The attenuation spectra fitting parameters are also consistent with previous measurements of ex vivo tissue found in the literature. The attenuation frequency power law, PL, for human prostate tissue is reported to be between 1 and 1.1, and α0 ranges from 0.09 to 0.78 (Christopher 2005; Parker et al. 1993). For human liver, PL varies between 0.81 and 1.5 (Parker et al. 1984), and α0 ranges from 0.40 to 0.7 (Lin et al. 1987). Maxwell et al. (2010) measured the attenuation of an agar phantom, and found a linear frequency dependence for attenuation between 1 and 5 MHz. Interestingly, the current study found the agar phantom exhibited a frequency exponent of 1.57, which is higher than either the prostate or liver phantoms, which were approximately 1.10. This frequency dependence indicates that the attenuation mechanisms in the agar phantom are closer to those in water (PL = 2). The agar phantom also had a lower attenuation coefficient over the bandwidth of the measurement (2–25 MHz) than either the prostate or liver phantoms.
A linear frequency dependence for the attenuation coefficient is valid up to approximately 10 MHz (see Fig. 1b). Beyond 10 MHz, the linear fit underestimates the attenuation coefficient. Frequency components above 10 MHz are present during histotripsy pulses, but their persistence depends on the relative degree of nonlinear propagation versus attenuation of the medium. Shock scattering histotripsy requires the formation of a microbubble cloud for tissue ablation (Xu et al. 2005). The precipitating event for microbubble cloud formation is the expansion of a single bubble, which scatters the shockwave geometrically (Maxwell et al. 2011). The portion of the incident shockwave that is scattered depends on the size of the bubble (Anderson 1950), which is dictated by the rarefactional pressure of the histotripsy pulse (Bader and Holland 2015). Equation (6) can be used to determine the number of harmonics that will contribute to shockwave formation, and potentially shockwave scattering. Note that if the frequency dependence of attenuation of the medium is linear (PL = 1), the bandwidth of the shockwave will independent of the fundamental frequency of the histotripsy pulse.
There are several aspects of this study that limit these findings. The attenuation measurement was done with an insertion loss technique, which neglected reflections of the incident pulse from the sample. Based on the measured acoustic impedance of the phantoms, the reflection coefficient (Pierce 1989) between the fluid and phantom was less than 4%. The influence of frequency-dependent attenuation on shockwave formation merits further investigation, and will require solving the Westervelt equation numerically for the highly focused fields require to generate histotripsy pulses (Soneson 2012). A finite-difference model will be employed in the future to study the influence of the frequency dependence of the attenuation on histotripsy shockwave formation in order to verify the predictions of eqn. (6) (Bader and Holland 2015).
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Focused Ultrasound Foundation (319R1) and the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS047603).
References
- Anderson VC. Sound scattering from a fluid sphere. J Acoust Soc Am. 1950;22:426–431. [Google Scholar]
- Bader KB, Holland CK. Development of a hybrid finite difference solution of the Westervelt equation using the fast nearfield method as a boundary condition for focused sources. AIP Conf Proc. 2015;1685:070005. [Google Scholar]
- Bamber JC, Hill CR. Ultrasonic attenuation and propagation speed in mammalian tissues as a function of temperature. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1979;5:149–157. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(79)90083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christopher T. HIFU focusing efficiency and a twin annular array source for prostate treatment. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr. 2005;52:1523–1533. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1516025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong F, Madsen EL, MacDonald MC, Zagzebski JA. Nonlinearity parameter for tissue-mimicking materials. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:831–838. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duck FA. Physical properties of tissue: A comprehensive reference book. Academic Press Inc; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- D’Souza WD, Madsen EL, Unal O, Vigen KK, Frank GR, Thomadsen BR. Tissue mimicking materials for a multi-imaging modality prostate phantom. Med Phys. 2001;28:688. doi: 10.1118/1.1354998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fedewa RJ, Carlson RF, Seip R. Prediction of Success for HIFU Treatments of Prostate Cancer Based on Acoustic Energy Density. In: Yuhas MP, editor. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Vancouver. 2006. pp. 732–735. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton MF, Blackstock DT. Nonlinear Acoustics. 1st. San Diego: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes SW. Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects. Phys Ed. 2005;40:468–474. [Google Scholar]
- Lin T, Ophir J, Potter G. Frequency-dependent ultrasonic differentiation of normal and diffusely diseased liver. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987;82:1131–1138. doi: 10.1121/1.395303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madsen EL, Frank GR, Dong F. Liquid or solid ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials with very low scatter. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madsen EL, Zagzebski JA, Banjavie RA, Jutila RE. Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms. Med Phys. 1978;5:391–394. doi: 10.1118/1.594483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh JN, Hall CS, Hughes MS, Mobley J, Miller G, Brandenburger GH. Broadband through-transmission signal loss measurements of Albunex(R) suspensions at concentrations approaching in vivo doses. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101:1155–1161. [Google Scholar]
- Maruvada S, Liu Y, Soneson JE, Herman BA, Harris GR. Comparison between experimental and computational methods for the acoustic and thermal characterization of therapeutic ultrasound fields. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;137:1704–1713. doi: 10.1121/1.4916280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell A, Sapozhnikov O, Bailey M, Crum L, Xu Z, Fowlkes B, Cain C, Khokhlova V. Disintegration of tissue using high intensity focused ultrasound: two approaches that utilize shock waves. Acoust Today. 2012;8:24–37. [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell AD, Wang T-Y, Cain CA, Fowlkes JB, Sapozhnikov OA, Bailey MR, Xu Z. Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130:1888–1898. doi: 10.1121/1.3625239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell AD, Wang T-Y, Yuan L, Duryea AP, Xu Z, Cain CA. A Tissue Phantom for Visualization and Measurement of Ultrasound-Induced Cavitation Damage. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:2132–2143. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mountford RA, Wells PN. Ultrasonic liver scanning: the quantitative analysis of the normal A-scan. Phys Med Biol. 1972;17:14–25. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/17/1/002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker KJ, Huang SR, Lerner RM, Lee F, Jr, Rubens D, Roach D. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Baltimore. 1993. Elastic and ultrasonic properties of the prostate; pp. 1035–1038. [Google Scholar]
- Parker KJ, Lerner RM, Waag RC. Attenuation of ultrasound: magnitude and frequency dependence for tissue characterization. Radiol. 1984;153:785–788. doi: 10.1148/radiology.153.3.6387795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parsons JE, Cain CA, Fowlkes JB. Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:1432. doi: 10.1121/1.2166708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pierce AD. Acoustics. 3rd. Melville: Acoustical Society of America; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Raymond JL, Haworth KJ, Bader KB, Radhakrishnan K, Griffin JK, Huang S-L, McPherson DD, Holland CK. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013:1–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selfridge AR. Approximate Material Properties in Isotropic Materials. Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE T Ultrason Ferr. 1985;32:381–394. [Google Scholar]
- Soneson JE. A parametric study of error in the parabolic approximation of focused axisymmetric ultrasound beams. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;131:EL481. doi: 10.1121/1.4722170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White DR, Woodard HQ, Hammond SM. Average soft-tissue and bone models for use in radiation dosimetry. Br J Radiol. 1987;60:907–913. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-717-907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Z, Fowlkes JB, Rothman ED, Levin AM, Cain CA. Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: The role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117:424. doi: 10.1121/1.1828551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Z, Ludomirsky A, Eun LY, Hall TL, Tran BC, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA. Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr. 2004;51:726–736. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2004.1308731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zell K, Sperl JI, Vogel MW, Niessner R, Haisch C. Acoustical properties of selected tissue phantom materials for ultrasound imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:N475–N484. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/N02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]