Abstract
Background/Aims
We conducted a 3-year longitudinal study concerning factors associated with changes in brain atrophy in elderly diabetic patients.
Methods
We evaluated hippocampal and global brain atrophy using automatic voxel-based morphometry of structural magnetic resonance images, 4 cognitive function tests, and cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) in 66 diabetic patients.
Results
During the 3-year follow-up, hippocampal and global brain atrophy advanced, and cognitive functions worsened. For changes in hippocampal atrophy, changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, and being an ApoE ε4 carrier were independent factors; change in the number of silent brain infarctions was an independent factor for changes in global brain atrophy. A significant association of changes in eGFR and albuminuria with hippocampal atrophy remained after adjusting for confounders including SVD. Both types of brain atrophy at baseline were significantly correlated with cognitive impairment at baseline and especially associated with changes in delayed word recall during the follow-up after adjusting for confounders.
Conclusion
Changes in eGFR and albuminuria during follow-up were independent risk factors for hippocampal atrophy, which was associated with decline in delayed word recall, suggesting that management of chronic kidney disease may prevent the progression of hippocampal atrophy.
Key Words: Brain atrophy, Cognitive impairment, Diabetes mellitus, Cerebral small vessel disease, Renal impairment
Introduction
The number of people with dementia is steadily increasing worldwide. It is estimated that around 4.6 million people in Japan have dementia, and it has become a serious medical and social problem. The number of older people with diabetes is also increasing as a result of an increased average life expectancy and changes in lifestyle. In previous large-scale epidemiological studies, it was reported that the incidence of dementia in diabetic patients is about twofold higher than in nondiabetic people [1,2]. Accordingly, an increase in the number of people with impaired glucose metabolism may have a great impact in increasing dementia prevalence. Although many mechanisms have been considered for an association between diabetes and cognitive dysfunction [3,4], this has not yet been fully clarified. Therefore, there is an immediate need to clarify mechanisms and develop new treatments for dementia. Early diagnosis of cognitive impairment and future prediction of cognitive decline will be useful in preventing dementia progression and its associated problems.
It has been reported that atrophy of the brain, especially the medial temporal lobe, is observed at a relatively early stage of Alzheimer's disease [5]. In addition, brain atrophy in people with diabetes has been reported to be more severe as compared with nondiabetic people [6,7]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is in now in widespread use, and many trials have been conducted on using it to estimate brain atrophy. With the method of evaluation using voxel-based morphometry (VBM), brain atrophy can be easily semi-quantified, and Hirata et al. [8] developed a computer-assisted analysis using VBM for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease at an early stage. Free software for this procedure, called VSRAD (voxel-based specific regional analysis system for Alzheimer's disease), has made it possible to estimate hippocampal atrophy easily and speedily. It has been reported that hippocampal atrophy as estimated by VSRAD was stronger in diabetic patients as compared with nondiabetic people, and the atrophy was associated with impaired cognitive function [9,10], in agreement with our recent cross-sectional study [11].
Therefore, we performed a 3-year longitudinal observation on brain atrophy as assessed with VSRAD in well-controlled elderly outpatients with type 2 diabetes in the present study. We investigated what factors were associated with progression of brain atrophy and whether brain atrophy at baseline predicted cognitive decline after 3 years.
Subjects and Methods
We performed a longitudinal observation study on cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes aged more than 65 years since 2006 as previously reported [12,13]. The present study was conducted on 74 diabetic patients, adding 13 patients newly recruited in 2009. Eight patients - 5 were institutionalized or moved, 1 died, and 2 declined participation - dropped out between 2009 and 2012. Finally, cognitive function tests were performed on 66 patients (mean 78.0 ± 5.6 years, 24 males and 42 females), 5 of whom did not receive MRI examinations due to pacemakers or declining them. Patients with severe cognitive impairment [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <19 points] and with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl) were also excluded in 2009.
Cognitive Function Tests
We selected the following standardized psychological tests for measurement of each function as reported previously [12,13]. The MMSE was used to assess orientation, registration, attention, calculation, language, and recall with a score range from 0 to 30 [14]. We performed word recall, a subtest of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale with a score ranging from 0 to 10 to assess verbal memory [15]. Immediately after the word list of 10 common nouns had been read, the respondents were asked to repeat as many words as they could recall in any order (immediate word recall). After approximately 30 min of interference tasks, the respondents were asked to recall the 10-word list again (delayed word recall). Complex psychomotor skills were evaluated by the Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS) test, a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised with a score ranging from 0 to 93 [16]. We used the modified Stroop Color Word (Stroop) test consisting of 2 successive tasks in order to assess attention/executive function, in which the seconds to completion are recorded and the difference between the time required to read the word card and that required to read the dot card is calculated. A wider time difference means lower cognitive performance [17]. We calculated z-scores [(individual test score) - (mean test score)/(standard deviation, SD)] for the neuropsychological tests except the MMSE. All neuropsychological tests were administered by a well-trained psychological tester. Depression was assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), which is a global test of depression with scores ranging from 0 to 15 [18].
Evaluation of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
MRI was performed on a 1.5-tesla Signa Horizon system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis., USA). The imaging protocol consisted of T1-weighted spin echo [inversion recovery; repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) = 2,380/27.4 ms, matrix 320 × 224], T2-weighted fast spin echo (TR/TE = 4,017/103 ms, matrix 156 × 256), and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR; TR/TE = 8,002/146 ms, matrix 256 × 192) sequences in the axial plane with a slice thickness of 5 mm and a 2-mm interslice gap. We defined silent brain infarction (SBI) as focal hyperintense areas >3 mm in diameter detected on T2-weighted images, hypointense areas on T1-weighted images, and areas of higher intensity than cerebrospinal fluid in FLAIR images. Lesions <3 mm in diameter or with a signal intensity similar to cerebrospinal fluid in FLAIR images were excluded because of the high possibility that they were enlarged perivascular spaces, even if they exhibited hyperintensity on T2-weighted images and hypointensity on T1-weighted images. When the row number of SBI was ≥6, it was counted as 6 for analytical purposes. Baseline white matter lesions (WMLs) were stratified for periventricular and subcortical areas separately. The periventricular WMLs (PWMLs) or subcortical WMLs (SWMLs) were rated according to the Fazekas scale (PWMLs: grade 0, no lesion; grade 1, caps or pencil-thin lining; grade 2, smooth halo; grade 3, large confluence extending into the deep white matter; SWMLs: grade 0, no lesion; grade 1, punctate; grade 2, early confluent; grade 3; confluent) [19].
Automatic VBM of Structural MRI (VSRAD)
Hirata et al. [8] developed a computer-assisted analysis using VBM for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease at an early stage, and the free software, VSRAD, is widely available in Japan. Recently, VSRAD was improved by changing to statistical parametric mapping (SPM) 8 from SPM 2, and the use of Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration through Exponentiated Lie Algebra (DARTEL) for standardization greatly enhanced diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease and estimation of global brain atrophy [20]. The analytical results automatically calculated by VSRAD are obtained through a comparison of the severity of gray matter atrophy in a volume of interest (VOI) at the bilateral head to tail of the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex, and amygdala regions and global brain with its original normal database template. The normal database contains data from 80 healthy volunteers (mean age 70.4 ± 7.8 years) with no memory impairment or cognitive disorders, and they are used as controls in VSRAD [20]. The z-score maps for gray matter anatomical standardization and voxel normalization to global mean intensities (global normalization) were obtained using values calculated by the following equation: z-score = [(control mean) - (individual value)]/(control SD). The z-score maps are displayed by overlay on tomographic sections and surface rendering of the standardized brain. The severity of atrophy in a target VOI was defined as the mean value of z-scores >0 in the VOI, and it was expressed as the hippocampal atrophy index (HAI). Figure 1 shows a case of progression in medial temporal lobe atrophy and HAI. In addition, the extent of gray matter atrophy was calculated as the percentage of coordinates with a z-score exceeding the threshold value of 2 in the whole brain [whole-brain atrophy index (WBAI) in %).
Evaluation of Patients
Fasting blood samples were separated and analyzed. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting blood glucose were measured using an autoanalyzer and routine enzymatic techniques. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HLC-723G7; Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan), and HbA1c was estimated as a National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) value (in %), calculated by the formula HbA1c (%) = [HbA1c Japan Diabetes Society (JDS)] (%) × 1.02 + 0.25 [21]. Plasma insulin was measured by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay. Inflammatory markers were assayed using the quantitative sandwich enzyme technique of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay QuantiGlo kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn., USA) for tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6, and an immunosorbent assay kit (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK) for soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) as reported previously [22]. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was assayed using a monoclonal antibody coated onto polystyrene particles and fixed-timed kinetic nephelometric measurements (BN II; Dade Behring, Marberg, Germany). Apolipoprotein (Apo) E genotype was determined for each participant by the Invader assay [23]. The Apo E genotype was divided into 2 groups, one with ε4 (3/4 and 4/4) and one without ε4 (3/3 and 3/2).
The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from the following 3-variable Japanese equation: GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) = 194 × serum creatinine−1.094 × age−0.287 × 0.739 (if female) [24]. A low eGFR was defined as <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Albuminuria was defined as albumin-to-creatinine ratios (ACRs), which were calculated from the measurement of albumin (in mg) and creatinine (in g) in spot urine, as follows: normoalbuminuria, <30 mg/g creatinine; microalbuminuria, 30-299 mg/g creatinine, and macroalbuminuria, ≥300 mg/g creatinine. Also, owing to the small number of participants with macroalbuminuria, micro- and macroalbuminuria were considered together as albuminuria. Diabetic retinopathy was classified as normal, simple and preproliferative, and proliferative retinopathy by ophthalmologists.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chubu Rosai Hospital. After informed consent was obtained from each of the participants, the study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by the paired t test on comparisons between baseline and after the 3-year follow-up. Comparisons for factors not forming normal distributions were performed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a nonparametric statistical method, and results are expressed as medians (interquartile range, 25-75%). The χ2 test was also conducted for independence. Comparisons between the groups were carried out using ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test. We carried out multiple linear regression or multiple logistic regression where appropriate, and variables with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered for multiple regression analysis. Also, if 2 variables had collinearity, one of them was not entered. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill., USA), and p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics at Baseline and after 3 Years of Follow-Up in Elderly Diabetic Patients
Diabetic patients were well controlled during the 3 years with an average HbA1c of 6.95 ± 0.62% (table 1). The average blood pressure during follow-up was 136.3 ± 10.6/72.9 ± 6.5 mm Hg. After 3 years, HDL-cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and eGFR values were decreased, and TNF-α, uric acid, and sICAM-1 levels were increased significantly, as compared with baseline values. Also, the rates of patients with a low eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and albuminuria had significantly increased after 3 years (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). As for cognitive function, scores for the MMSE, immediate word recall, and DSS test had declined after 3 years (MMSE score 25.4 ± 3.1 at baseline vs. 24.8 ± 3.7 at 3 years of follow-up, p = 0.081; immediate word recall score 6.64 ± 1.31 vs. 6.25 ± 1.67, p = 0.021; delayed word recall score 6.47 ± 2.141 vs. 6.24 ± 2.74, p = 0.313; DSS test score 34.1 ± 10.6 vs. 31.3 ± 11.7, p < 0.001; Stroop test score 20.3 ± 13.9 vs. 19.0 ± 11.5, p = 0.416).
Table 1.
Baseline | After 3 years | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Duration of diabetes, years | 21.8 ± 8.8 | – | – |
Education, years | 9.47 ± 1.80 | – | – |
ApoE ε4 (yes/no) | 10/56 (15.2%) | – | – |
Smoking (never/ex-/current) | 43/14/9 | 43/18/5 | – |
Treatment (diet/OHAs/insulin) | 13/41/12 | 13/41/12 | – |
Nephropathy (normo-/micro-/macroalbuminuria) | 48/11/7 | 37/22/7 | – |
Retinopathy (no/simple/proliferative) | 44/10/12 | 46/9/11 | – |
Body mass index | 23.1 ± 3.8 | 23.2 ± 4.1 | 0.77 |
Waist circumference, cm | 84.6 ± 11.0 | 85.2 ± 11.4 | 0.54 |
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 137.5 ± 14.9 | 133.6 ± 18.7 | 0.15 |
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 74.3 ± 8.3 | 70.8 ± 11.4 | 0.02 |
RAS blocker use (yes/no) | 42/24 (63.6%) | 45/21 (68.2%) | 0.45 |
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dl | 57.7 ± 14.9 | 54.0 ± 15.6 | <0.01 |
Triglycerides, mg/dl | 100.0 (73.0–140.0) | 104.0 (73.0–141.0) | 0.69 |
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dl | 108.6 ± 21.4 | 103.7 ± 27.5 | 0.13 |
Statin use (yes/no) | 39/27 (59.1%) | 38/28 (57.6%) | 1.00 |
Fasting blood glucose, mg/dl | 127.6 ± 32.3 | 132.7 ± 31.0 | 0.36 |
Fasting insulina, μU/ml | 5.10 (4.00–8.08) | 4.90 (3.20–8.00) | 0.47 |
HbA1c, % | 7.04 ± 0.77 | 6.92 ± 0.69 | 0.13 |
Serum creatinine, mg/dl | 0.78 ± 0.23 | 0.86 ± 0.26 | <0.001 |
eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 65.4 ± 15.6 | 59.4 ± 17.8 | <0.001 |
eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (yes/no) | 23/43 (34.8%) | 36/30 (54.5%) | 0.01 |
Urinary ACR, mg/g creatinine | 26.0 (15.0–49.0) | 23.0 (15.0–49.0) | 0.48 |
Albumin, g/dl | 4.24 ± 0.33 | 4.28 ± 0.53 | 0.51 |
Uric acid, mg/dl | 5.23 ± 1.28 | 5.64 ± 1.50 | <0.01 |
hs-CRP, mg/l | 0.30 (0.20–0.80) | 0.44 (0.25–1.53) | 0.11 |
sICAM-1, μg/l | 203.5 ± 65.1 | 218.5 ± 83.3 | <0.01 |
TNF-α, pg/ml | 1.65 (0.94–2.30) | 1.98 (1.38–2.57) | 0.02 |
IL-6, pg/ml | 1.18 (0.78–1.84) | 1.29 (0.83–2.19) | 0.13 |
Data are expressed as means ± SD or medians (interquartile range, 25–75%) unless specified otherwise. OHAs = Oral hypoglycemic agents; RAS blocker = renin angiotensin system blocker; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6.
Insulin users are excluded.
During the 3-year follow-up, SBI progression was noted in 5 patients (8.2%), and progression of PWMLs and SWMLs was observed in 6 (9.8%) and 3 patients (4.9%), respectively. As for brain atrophy, the HAI increased from 1.50 ± 0.76 to 1.75 ± 0.94 (0.083 per year; p = 0.001), and the WBAI increased from 8.65 ± 2.62 to 9.78 ± 2.93% (p < 0.001).
Factors Associated with Brain Atrophy, HAI, and WBAI
HAI was significantly correlated with GDS score, age, a low eGFR, and the number of SBI at baseline, and multivariate analysis showed that GDS score (standardized β = 0.225, SE = 0.028, p = 0.078) and a low eGFR (β = 0.203, SE = 0.211, p = 0.098) had a tendency to be associated with HAI (r2 = 0.229, p = 0.003). In contrast, WBAI was significantly correlated with age, sex, GDS score, the number of SBIs, PWML grade, SWML grade, eGFR, and levels of serum albumin, sICAM-1, log TNF-α, and LDL-cholesterol, and multivariate analysis showed that age (β = 0.341, SE = 0.062, p = 0.013), GDS score (β = 0.247, SE = 0.072, p = 0.023), and SWML grade (β = 0.349, SE = 0.452, p = 0.016) were associated with WBAI (r2 = 0.583, p < 0.001).
Factors associated with changes in HAI and WBAI during the 3-year follow-up are shown in table 2. Changes in HAI were significantly correlated with changes in eGFR, age, diastolic blood pressure at baseline, changes in HDL-cholesterol, ApoE ε4 carrier, and albuminuria during follow-up in univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis showed that changes in eGFR, ApoE ε4 carrier, and albuminuria during follow-up were independent factors for changes in HAI. In contrast, although changes in WBAI were significantly correlated with the factors listed in table 2, only change in the number of SBIs was an independent factor in multivariate analysis.
Table 2.
Univariate analysis |
Multivariate analysis |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
correlation coefficient | p value | standardized β coefficient (SE) | p value | |
∆HAI | r2 = 0.388, p < 0.001 | |||
∆eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | −0.396 | 0.002 | −0.282 (0.007) | 0.022 |
Age (years) | 0.377 | 0.003 | 0.213 (0.012) | 0.074 |
DBP at base (mm Hg) | −0.297 | 0.020 | −0.096 (0.007) | 0.425 |
∆HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.288 | 0.025 | −0.151 (0.007) | 0.461 |
ApoE ε4 carrier | 0.277 | 0.031 | 0.285 (0.178) | 0.013 |
Albuminuria during follow-up | 0.267 | 0.037 | 0.232 (0.120) | 0.038 |
∆WBAI | r2 = 0.295, p = 0.008 | |||
∆PWML grade | 0.306 | 0.016 | 0.196 (0.728) | 0.123 |
Waist circumference at base (cm) | 0.299 | 0.020 | 0.214 (0.022) | 0.145 |
Duration of diabetes (years) | 0.276 | 0.031 | 0.173 (0.027) | 0.223 |
Treatment modality | 0.276 | 0.031 | 0.063 (0.445) | 0.694 |
Retinopathy | 0.272 | 0.034 | 0.082 (0.307) | 0.578 |
log CRP at base | 0.253 | 0.049 | 0.036 (0.403) | 0.797 |
∆SBI (number of infarcts) | 0.253 | 0.049 | 0.266 (0.697) | 0.031 |
Variables with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into the multiple regression analysis. Retinopathy: 0 = none; 1 = simple; 2 = proliferative. Treatment modality: 0 = diet; 1 = oral hypoglycemic agents; 2 = insulin. DBP = Diastolic blood pressure; CRP = C-reactive protein.
With regard to an association of brain atrophy with renal impairment, changes in eGFR were significantly correlated with changes in HAI (fig. 2a), but not in WBAI, and the correlation remained significant after adjusting for covariates such as age, sex, ApoE ε4 carrier, HAI and eGFR at baseline, and albuminuria (p = 0.031). In contrast, although changes in ACR were not correlated with brain atrophy (data not shown), a significant increase in HAI was observed in patients with albuminuria as compared with patients without albuminuria during the follow-up (0.423 ± 0.664 vs. 0.129 ± 0.410, p = 0.037), and the significance remained after adjusting for age, sex, ApoE ε4 carrier, changes in eGFR, and HAI at baseline (odds ratio 4.81, 95% CI 1.26-18.37, p = 0.022). Also, the HAI showed a tendency to gradually increase in patients with newly detected albuminuria (0.343 ± 0.375) and persistent albuminuria (0.502 ± 0.874) as compared with those without albuminuria (p = 0.087) (fig. 2b).
Association between Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Function Tests
At baseline, HAI was correlated with scores on the MMSE (r = −0.282, p = 0.015), immediate word recall (r = −0.203, p = 0.083), delayed word recall (r = −0.276, p = 0.017), and the DSS test (r = −0.345, p = 0.003), and WBAI was correlated with scores on the MMSE (r = −0.390, p = 0.001), immediate word recall (r = −0.299, p = 0.010), delayed word recall (r = −0.281, p = 0.015), the DSS test (r = −0.419, p < 0.001), and the Stroop test (r = 0.244, p = 0.036).
An association between brain atrophy at baseline and changes in cognitive function tests during the 3-year follow-up is indicated in table 3. Baseline HAI was significantly correlated with changes in delayed word recall (fig. 3a) and Stroop test scores, and these significant associations remained after adjusting for covariates. In contrast, baseline WBAI was significantly correlated with changes in scores of immediate and delayed word recall after adjusting for covariates (fig. 3b). Also, such significant associations still remained after adding the number of infarcts and the grade of WMLs at baseline, or their changes during the follow-up, to the covariates (data not shown).
Table 3.
∆MMSE score | ∆word recall score |
∆DSS test score | ∆Stroop test score | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
∆immediate | ∆delayed | ||||
HAI at baseline | |||||
Model 1 | −0.184 (0.113) | −0.161 (0.129) | −0.340 (0.095)** | −0.080 (0.065) | 0.251 (0.155)* |
Model 2 | −0.228 (0.116)# | −0.135 (0.132) | −0.348 (0.104)** | −0.010 (0.074) | 0.233 (0.126)* |
Model 3 | −0.290 (0.143)# | −0.155 (0.155) | −0.298 (0.106)* | −0.089 (0.086) | 0.295 (0.152)* |
WBAI at baseline | |||||
Model 1 | −0.035 (0.037) | −0.352 (0.040)*** | −0.429 (0.030)**** | −0.262 (0.022)* | 0.032 (0.054) |
Model 2 | −0.048 (0.047) | −0.379 (0.047)** | −0.496 (0.037)*** | −0.234 (0.028) | 0.074 (0.055) |
Model 3 | −0.002 (0.052) | −0.458 (0.134)*** | −0.471 (0.034)*** | −0.130 (0.029) | 0.062 (0.058) |
In the multivariate analysis, changes in cognitive function domains were used as the dependent variable. Values are standardized β and coefficients (SE).
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.005,
p < 0.001.
Model 1: no adjustment. Model 2: adjustment for age, sex, years of education, and each cognitive function domain at baseline. Model 3: adjustment for duration of diabetes, ApoE ε4 carrier, the mean of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and HbA1c during follow-up, eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria, treatment modality (0 = diet, 1 = oral hypoglycemic agents, 2 = insulin), and current smoking (0 = no, 1 = yes) in addition to the factors in model 2.
With regard to associations between changes in brain atrophy and cognitive function tests during the 3-year follow-up, changes in HAI were only correlated with changes in DSS test scores, and the relationship remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, years of education, and baseline scores (β = −0.293, SE = 0.145, p = 0.019). In contrast, no significant relationship was observed between changes in WBAI and cognitive function tests.
Discussion
A large number of studies have shown that a smaller brain volume due to atrophy, especially hippocampal atrophy, on MRI was noted in subjects with Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment as compared with those without, and such atrophy was associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia [5]. It is well known that impaired cognitive function is more prevalent in diabetic patients as compared with nondiabetic subjects, from large epidemiological studies [1,2], and it has also been reported that brain atrophy was greater in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic subjects [6,7]. Although it has often been reported that factors such as blood glucose, duration of diabetes, insulin resistance, involvement of hypertension, and cerebrovascular disease are associated with brain atrophy in diabetic patients [6,7,25,26], the mechanisms by which greater brain atrophy occurs in diabetic patients have not been fully resolved.
Our present 3-year observation showed that progression of hippocampal atrophy was independently associated with ApoE ε4 genotype, changes in eGFR, and albuminuria. In contrast, progression of global atrophy was associated with only changes in lacunar infarcts. So far, a positive relationship between brain volumes and glucose levels has often been reported [27,28], and the ACCORD MIND study showed that less brain atrophy was found in strict control groups as compared with standard control groups [29]. However, most studies in a recent systematic review showed that HbA1c levels were not associated with the presence of brain atrophy and changes in brain volumes in type 2 diabetes [30], in accordance with the present study.
Thus, although the present study revealed no significant independent associations of diabetes characteristics, such as glucose metabolism and insulin resistance, with changes in brain atrophy, further large-scale studies will be needed to clarify such associations. However, interestingly, it is noteworthy that renal impairment was independently associated with brain atrophy, especially hippocampal atrophy, in the present study. Sink et al. [31] have recently reported that urinary ACRs were significantly associated with global gray matter atrophy and eGFR was associated with WML volumes in hippocampal lesions in African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Also, Mehta et al. [32] have reported that subclinical albuminuria was associated with gray matter atrophy in the global brain in type 2 diabetes. In addition, associations of GFR and albuminuria with brain atrophy have been reported in nondiabetic subjects [33,34]. However, it has also been observed that microvascular complications such as albuminuria were not associated with brain volumes or volume changes [35]. In this regard, our previous cross-sectional study showed that global atrophy was associated with both eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria, while hippocampal atrophy was associated with albuminuria [11]. In the present observation, changes in albuminuria and eGFR were associated with changes in hippocampal atrophy, but not global atrophy. To our knowledge, there have been few studies on a relationship of renal impairment with hippocampal atrophy. The reason why changes in renal impairment were associated with changes in hippocampal lesions but not those in global brain atrophy was not clear, and further studies will be needed to verify this.
In addition, although the mechanisms underlying the pathological association between renal impairment and brain atrophy remain unclear, several hypotheses might explain such an association. Generally, the brain and kidney could be considered as end organs having similar low-resistance vascular beds and endothelial structures. Endothelial dysfunction in the kidney might contribute to impaired glomerular filtration resulting from a reduction of nitric oxide synthase activity and secondary protein leakage [36], while dysfunctions in the brain might decrease the clearance of β-amyloid and lead to the accumulation of neurotoxic substances resulting from blood-brain barrier damage, leading to brain atrophy and cognitive impairment [37]. Albuminuria is thought to be a marker of endothelial dysfunction, and many studies have been conducted in regard to an association between it and cognitive impairment [38,39]. Our previous study showed that changes in albuminuria were correlated with decline in word recall [40], and that serum levels of ICAM-1, which reflect endothelial damage, were associated with executive function assessed with the DSS test [41].
From another viewpoint, the majority of studies have reported that the presence and progression of small vessel disease (SVD) were associated with brain atrophy in nondiabetic [42,43] and diabetic subjects [25,44]. Although the mechanisms for an association of SVD with brain atrophy also remain unclear, one possible explanation is that the hypoxic-ischemic condition brought about by SVD damages brain tissues such as myelin and axons, leading to shrinking of the brain. However, a connection between SVD and brain atrophy has not always been established, because results have differed depending on whether the SVD consisted of lacunar infarcts or WMLs, the atrophy was global or regional, or the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. In fact, WMLs were associated with global brain atrophy at baseline, while changes in lacunar infarcts were longitudinally associated with changes in global brain atrophy in the present study. We did not find an association of SVD with hippocampal atrophy.
Regarding an association between cognitive domains and brain atrophy, it has been reported that brain atrophy was associated with impairment of information processing speed, attention, executive function, and memory [6,7]. Our study also showed that both global and hippocampal atrophy were associated with memory, psychomotor speed, and executive function, while changes in hippocampal atrophy were only associated with changes in psychomotor speed during the follow-up. In addition, hippocampal atrophy at baseline was a predictor of decline in delayed memory and executive function, while global atrophy at baseline was a predictor of decline in both immediate and delayed memory after adjusting for confounders. Most cross-sectional studies have reported an association between brain volumes and executive functioning or processing speed [6]. In contrast, a longitudinal study by van Elderen et al. [45] reported that global atrophy at baseline was a predictor of immediate verbal memory loss, which is basically consistent with our results. Also, another longitudinal study showed that progressive medial temporal atrophy, but not baseline gray matter, predicted a significant decrease in memory function [26]. In any case, one may say that brain atrophy is a good predictor of future cognitive decline, although there only is an association for some cognitive domains but not for others.
Several limitations of this study should be taken into consideration. First, it was a small-scale hospital-based study, and treatment according to the guidelines may have influenced the results. In addition, it was unclear whether the results of the present study were peculiar to diabetes and independent of aging, since this was not investigated in nondiabetic subjects. Therefore, further large-scale studies will be needed to verify our results. Second, cognitive impairment due to vascular dementia was indistinguishable from that due to Alzheimer's disease. Third, the free VSRAD software was developed as a tool for VBM using data from a Japanese database; thus, if it is going to be used for people of other ethnic groups, it will be necessary to modify the software to suit databases for such people.
In conclusion, changes in eGFR and albuminuria were independent risk factors for hippocampal atrophy, which was associated with decline in word recall, suggesting that the management of chronic kidney disease may prevent progression of hippocampal atrophy. In addition, the usefulness of VSRAD, a simple and easy-to-use tool, in predicting the progression of cognitive decline associated with brain atrophy was demonstrated in the daily clinical setting.
Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by research funds to promote hospital function from the Japan Labor Health and Welfare Organization.
References
- 1.Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, Pois HAP, Hofman A, Breteler MMB. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia. The Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 1999;53:1937–1942. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gudala K, Bansal D, Schifano F, Bhansali A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:640–650. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Biessels GJ, Staekenborg S, Brunner E, Brayne C, Scheltens P. Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:69–74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70284-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawamura T, Umemura T, Hotta N. Cognitive impairment in diabetic patients: can diabetic control prevent cognitive decline? J Diabetes Investig. 2012;3:413–423. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00234.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.den Heijer T, van der Lijin F, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, van der Lugt A, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ, Breteler MMB. A 10-year follow-up of hippocampal volume on magnetic resonance imaging in early dementia and cognitive decline. Brain. 2010;133:1163–1172. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Biessels GJ, Reijimer YD. Brain changes underlying cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: what can we learn from MRI? Diabetes. 2014;63:2244–2252. doi: 10.2337/db14-0348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brundel M, Kappelle LJ, Biessels GJ. Brain imaging in type 2 diabetes. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24:1967–1981. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hirata Y, Matsuda H, Nemoto K, Ohnishi T, Hirao K, Yamashita F, Asada T, Iwabuchi S, Samejima H. Voxel-based morphometry to discriminate early Alzheimer's disease from controls. Neurosci Lett. 2005;382:269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kamiyama K, Wada A, Sugihara M, Kurioka S, Hayashi K, Hayashi T, Yoshisako T, Yamamoto N, Tsuchie Y, Yamaguchi S, Sugimoto T, Kitagaki H. Potential hippocampal region atrophy in diabetes mellitus type 2: a voxel-based morphometry VSRAD study. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:266–272. doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0416-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hayashi K, Kurioka S, Yamaguchi T, Morita M, Kanazawa I, Takase H, Wada A, Kitagaki H, Nagai A, Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Sugimoto T. Association of cognitive dysfunction with hippocampal atrophy in elderly Japanese people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94:180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kawamura T, Umemura T, Imamine R, Umegaki H, Kawano N, Mizoguchi A, Kawai M, Minatoguchi M, Kusama M, Kouchi Y, Watarai A, Kanai A, Nakashima E, Hotta N. Factors associated with brain atrophy estimated with automatic voxel-based morphometry of structural magnetic resonance images in elderly diabetic patients: impact of albuminuria on hippocampal atrophy. J Diabetes Metab. 2015;6:491. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Umegaki H, Kawamura T, Mogi N, Umemura T, Kanai A, Sano T. Glucose control levels, ischaemic brain lesions, and hyperinsulinaemia were associated with cognitive dysfunction in diabetic elderly. Age Aging. 2008;37:458–461. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Imamine R, Kawamura T, Umemura T, Umegaki H, Kawano N, Hotta M, Kouchi Y, Hatsuda S, Watarai A, Kanai A, Nakashima E, Sano T, Sakakibara T, Nakamura J, Hotta N. Does cerebral small vessel disease predict future decline of cognitive function in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination. A comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mohs RC, Rosen WG, Davis KL. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: an instrument for assessing treatment efficacy. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1983;19:448–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shinagawa F, Kobayashi S, Fujita K, Maekawa H. A Japanese Version of the WAIS-R (in Japanese) Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagaku-sha; 1990. pp. 115–118. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643–662. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yesavage JA. The use of self-rating depression scales in the elderly. In: Poon LW, editor. Clinical Memory Assessment of Older Adults. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1986. pp. 213–217. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:351–356. doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.2.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsuda H, Mizumura S, Nemoto K, Yamashita F, Imabayashi E, Sato N, Asada T. Automatic voxel-based morphometry of structural MRI by SPM8 plus diffeomorphic anatomic registration through exponentiated Lie algebra improves the diagnosis of probable Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1109–1114. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kashiwagi A, Kasuga M, Araki E, Oka Y, Hanafusa T, Ito H, Tominaga M, Oikawa S, Noda M, Kawamura T, Sanke T, Namba M, Hashimoto M, Sasahara T, Nishio Y, Kuwa K, Ueki K, Takei I, Umemoto M, Murakami Y, Ohashi H. International clinical harmonization of glycated hemoglobin in Japan: from Japan Diabetes Society to National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program values. J Diabetes Investig. 2012;3:39–40. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00207.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kawamura T, Umemura T, Kanai A, Nagashima M, Nakamura N, Uno T, Nakayama M, Sano T, Hamada Y, Nakamura J, Hotta N. Soluble adhesion molecules and C-reactive protein in the progression of silent cerebral infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2006;55:461–466. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nghiem NT, Mai TTT, Ohmori R, Kuroki M, van Chuyen N, Hung NTK, Kawakami M, Kondo K. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in Vietnamese children and its relationship to plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels. Metabolism. 2004;53:1517–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–992. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.de Bresser J, Tiehuis AM, van den Berg E, Reijmer YD, Jongen C, Kappelle LJ, Mali WP, Viergever MA, Biessels GJ. Progression of cerebral atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1309–1314. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Willette AA, Xu G, Johnson SC, Birdsill AC, Jonaitis EM, Sager MA, Hermann BP, La Rue A, Asthana S, Bendlin BB. Insulin resistance, brain atrophy, and cognitive performance in late middle-aged adults. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:443–449. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cherbuim N, Sachdev P, Anstey KJ. High normal fasting plasma glucose is associated with hippocampal atrophy. The PATH Study. Neurology. 2012;79:1019–1026. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826846de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kerti L, Witte AV, Winkler A, Grittner U, Rujescu D, Flöel A. Higher glucose levels associated with lower memory and reduced hippocampal microstructure. Neurology. 2013;81:1746–1752. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000435561.00234.ee. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Launer LJ, Miller M, Williamson JD, Lazar RM, Gerstein HC, Murray AM, Sullivan MD, Horowitz KR, Ding J, Marcovina S, Lovato LC, Lovato J, Margolis KL, O'Connor P, Lipkin EW, Hirsch J, Coker LH, Maldjian J, Sunshine JL, Truwit C, Davatzikos C, Bryan RN. Effects of intensive glucose lowering on brain structure and function in people with type 2 diabetes (ACCORD MIND): a randomized open-label substudy. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:969–977. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70188-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Geijselaers SL, Sep SJ, Stehouwer CD, Biessels GJ. Glucose regulation, cognition, and brain MRI in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:75–89. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sink KM, Divers J, Whitlow CT, Palmer ND, Smith SC, Xu J, Hugenschmidt CE, Wagner BC, Williamson JD, Bowden DW, Maldjian JA, Freedman BI. Cerebral structural changes in diabetic kidney disease: African American-Diabetes Heart Study MIND. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:206–212. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mehta D, Pimentel DA, Núñez M-Z, Abduljalil A, Novak V. Subclinical albuminuria is linked to gray matter atrophy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2014;63:1390–1397. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Knopman DS, Mosley TH, Jr, Bailey KR, Jack CR, Jr, Schwartz GL, Turner ST. Associations of microalbuminuria with brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in hypertensive sibships. J Neurol Sci. 2008;271:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vogels SCM, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Verhaar HJJ, Koek HL. The association of chronic kidney disease with brain lesions on MRI or CT: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2012;71:331–336. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de Bresser J, Reijmer YD, van den Berg E, Breedijk MA, Kappelle LJ, Viergever MA, Biessels GJ. Microvascular determinants of cognitive decline and brain volume change in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30:381–386. doi: 10.1159/000321354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murray AM. The brain and the kidney connection: a model of accelerated vascular cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2009;73:916–917. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b99a2e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:723–738. doi: 10.1038/nrn3114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barzilay JI, Lovato JF, Murray AM, Williamson J, Ismail-Beigi F, Karl D, Papademetriou V, Launer LJ. Albuminuria and cognitive decline in people with diabetes and normal renal function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1907–1914. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11321112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Umemura T, Kawamura T, Umegaki H, Kawano N, Mashita S, Sakakibara T, Hotta N, Sobue G. Association of chronic kidney disease and cerebral small vessel disease with cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2013;3:212–222. doi: 10.1159/000351424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kawamura T, Umemura T, Umegaki H, Imamine R, Kawano N, Tanaka C, Kawai M, Minatoguchi M, Kusama M, Kouchi Y, Watarai A, Kanai A, Nakashima E, Hotta N. Effect of renal impairment on cognitive function during a 3-year follow up in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: association with microinflammation. J Diabetes Investig. 2014;5:597–605. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Umemura T, Kawamura T, Umegaki H, Mashita S, Kanai A, Sakakibara T, Hotta N, Sobue G. Endothelial and inflammatory markers in relation to progression of ischaemic cerebral small-vessel disease and cognitive impairment: a 6-year longitudinal study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:1186–1194. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.217380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Appelman APA, Exalto LG, van der Graaf Y, Biessels GJ, Mali WPTM, Geerlings MI. White matter lesions and brain atrophy: more than shared risk factors? A systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28:227–242. doi: 10.1159/000226774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kloppenborg RP, Nederkoorn PJ, Grool AM, Vincken KL, Mali WPTM, Vermeulen M, van der Graaf Y, Geerlings MI. Cerebral small-vessel disease and progression of brain atrophy: the SMART-MR study. Neurology. 2012;79:2029–2036. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749f02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Moran C, Phan TG, Chen J, Blizzard L, Beare R, Venn A, Münch G, Wood AG, Forbes J, Greenaway TM, Pearson S, Srikanth V. Brain atrophy in type 2 diabetes: regional distribution and influence on cognition. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:4036–4042. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Elderen SGC, de Roos A, de Craen AJM, Westendorp RGJ, Blauw GJ, Jukema JW, Bollen ELEM, Middelkoop HAM, van Buchem MA, van der Grond J. Progression of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in diabetes mellitus: a 3-year follow-up. Neurology. 2010;75:997–1002. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f25f06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]