Abstract
Rhodococcus fascians, a phytopathogen that alters plant development, inflicts significant losses in plant production around the world. We report here the complete genome sequence of R. fascians D188, a well-characterized model isolate, and Rhodococcus species PBTS (pistachio bushy top syndrome) 1 and 2, which were shown to be responsible for a disease outbreak in pistachios.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Rhodococcus fascians, the sole characterized plant pathogen in the genus Rhodococcus, is a Gram-positive pleomorphic bacterium that causes disease through the production and modulation of plant growth regulators, such as cytokinins and auxins (1). R. fascians infects a large variety of plants, including monocots and dicots, often causing cryptic symptomology (2). R. fascians D188, which has intensively been studied for decades, has revealed a wealth of knowledge about this plant pathogen, including chromosomal and plasmid localized virulence genes necessary for symptomatic host colonization and cytokinin production (3, 4). The virulence plasmid pFiD188 was previously sequenced using Sanger technology, and fragmented draft genome sequences for multiple R. fascians isolates, including D188, are available (5, 6). Pistachio bushy top syndrome (PBTS) describes a suite of symptoms affecting clonally propagated UCB-1, an interspecific hybrid rootstock planted in California, Arizona, and New Mexico (7, 8). Two distinct Rhodococcus species isolates (PBTS 1 and PBTS 2) were isolated from diseased trees and shown to cause stunting and abnormal root and shoot development in pathogenicity assays. Given the global scale of nursery plant production and the diverse population structure of R. fascians, as indicated by initial genome sequences (6), high-quality complete reference sequences are needed to fully characterize newly discovered isolates. The reference R. fascians strain D188 (from the private collection of D. Vereecke) and PBTS isolates (7) were stored in glycerol stocks at -80°C. Cultures were grown in 50 ml of LB broth, and DNA was extracted using a Wizard genomic DNA purification kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). DNA was shipped on dry ice to the National Center for Genomic Resources (NCGR, Santa Fe, NM) for single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing. Libraries with a 10-kb insert were prepared, and each isolate was sequenced using one SMRT cell on the PacBio RS II instrument (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA). Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process (HGAP) was used for de novo assembly (9) (RS_HGAP assembly.2; Pacific Biosciences). For strain D188, an additional round of polishing was performed using only reads with a quality of ≥84. The genomes were annotated with Prokka version 1.12-beta (10), protein-coding features were predicted using Prodigal version 2.6 (11), tRNA was predicted by ARAGORN version 1.2 (12), and rRNA was predicted by RNAmmer version 1.2 (13). The genome annotations reveal a wealth of predicted secondary metabolism-related genes, including novel antibiotic synthesis, heavy metal resistance, siderophore production, pilus-like assembly mechanisms, secreted proteins, transposons and other mobile elements, and prophage sequences.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The complete genome and plasmid sequences for this whole-genome shotgun project have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the following accession numbers: CP015235, CP015236, and CP015237 for D188, CP015219 for PBTS 1, and CP015220 and CP015221 for PBTS 2. The versions described in this paper are CP015235.1, CP015236.1, CP015237.1, CP015219.1, CP015220.1, and CP015221.1, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jordan Martin for computer assistance.
This work was funded by the California Pistachio Research Board and the New Mexico State University Agricultural Experimental Station. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Footnotes
Citation Stamler RA, Vereecke D, Zhang Y, Schilkey F, Devitt N, Randall JJ. 2016. Complete genome and plasmid sequences for Rhodococcus fascians D188 and draft sequences for Rhodococcus isolates PBTS 1 and PBTS 2. Genome Announc 4(3):e00495-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00495-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Stes E, Vandeputte OM, El Jaziri M, Holsters M, Vereecke D. 2011. A successful bacterial coup d’état: how Rhodococcus fascians redirects plant development. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:69–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Putnam ML, Miller ML. 2007. Rhodococcus fascians in herbaceous perennials. Plant Dis 91:1064–1076. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-9-1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vereecke D, Cornelis K, Temmerman W, Jaziri M, Van Montagu M, Holsters M, Goethals K. 2002. Chromosomal locus that affects pathogenicity of Rhodococcus fascians. J Bacteriol 184:1112–1120. doi: 10.1128/jb.184.4.1112-1120.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crespi M, Vereecke D, Temmerman W, Van Montagu M, Desomer J. 1994. The fas operon of Rhodococcus fascians encodes new genes required for efficient fasciation of host plants. J Bacteriol 176:2492–2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Francis I, De Keyser A, De Backer P, Simón-Mateo C, Kalkus J, Pertry I, Ardiles-Diaz W, De Rycke R, Vandeputte OM, El Jaziri M, Holsters M, Vereecke D. 2012. pFiD188, the linear virulence plasmid of Rhodococcus fascians D188. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:637–647. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-11-0215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Creason AL, Vandeputte OM, Savory EA, Davis EW II, Putnam ML, Hu E, Swader-Hines D, Mol A, Baucher M, Prinsen E, Zdanowska M, Givan SA, El Jaziri M, Loper JE, Mahmud T, Chang JH. 2014. Analysis of genome sequences from plant pathogenic Rhodococcus reveals genetic novelties in virulence loci. PLoS One 9:e101996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stamler RA, Kilcrease J, Fichtner E, Kallsen C, Cooke P, Heerema RJ, Randall JJ. 2015. First report of Rhodococcus isolates causing pistachio bushy top syndrome on ‘UCB-1’ rootstock in California and Arizona. Plant Dis 99:1468–1476. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-14-1340-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stamler RA, Heerema R, Randall JJ. 2015. First report of phytopathogenic Rhodococcus isolates on pistachio bushy top syndrome ‘UCB-1’ rootstock in New Mexico. Plant Dis 99:1854. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-15-0471-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]