Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2015 Sep 1;23(9):1561. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.08.001

Cryo-EM: spinning the micelles away

Satinder K Singh 1, Fred Sigworth 1
PMCID: PMC4901521  NIHMSID: NIHMS788019  PMID: 26331455

Structural characterization of integral membrane proteins (MPs) demands that the samples be pure, monodisperse, and stable. Detergents are required to extract MPs from the lipid bilayer in which they reside and to stabilize them for downstream biophysical analyses. Some of the best MP-stabilizing detergents pose problems for cryo-EM studies, but Hauer et al. (2015) now offer a solution called GraDeR.

Lauryl maltose-neopentyl glycol (LMNG) is one of a new class of detergents that solubilizes and stabilizes a wide range of membrane proteins (MPs) much better than traditional detergents (Chae et al., 2010). Methods of solubilizing MPs are of great interest for single-particle electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM), which is rapidly yielding MP structures at resolutions rivaling those of X-ray crystallography (Cheng, 2015). LMNG can be problematic for cryo-EM studies however because of its extremely low critical micelle concentration (CMC). The CMC is, roughly speaking, the free monomer concentration as buffered by micelles in a detergent solution. Dodecylmaltoside (DDM), the mainstay “low-CMC” detergent has a CMC around 120–180 micromolar, whereas LMNG has CMC estimated to be about 11 nanomolar (Chung et al., 2012). Although low-CMC detergents pose technical challenges for cryo-EM studies, Hauer et al. (2015) now report a very successful gradient-centrifugation approach for preparing MP complexes with LMNG.

In single-particle cryo-EM specimens, the presence of excess detergent micelles creates a severe interfering background in the micrographs. Indeed, micelles of DDM and LMNG are so large that they are often indistinguishable from protein particles (see Fig. S1 of Hauer et al. (2015) for an example). The presence of detergent also affects the surface tension of the thin buffer film that is vitrified in cryo-EM sample preparation. The removal of excess detergent is therefore essential but notoriously difficult in the low-CMC case. Removal of detergent monomers by dialysis is intolerably slow and with size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) the micelles often run at the same velocity as a protein peak of similar molecular weight. Even adsorption to polystyrene beads, usually the standard means for removing low-CMC detergents, may require considerable time and effort to determine empirically the appropriate amount to use.

In cryo-EM one successful approach has been to use amphiphilic polymers (amphipols; Popot et al., 2011) instead of detergents. These bind tightly to protein, and the excess can be removed completely by SEC. Hauer et al. now show that with their straightforward “GraDeR” approach, LMNG-solubilized complexes can similarly be made with negligible excess detergent and micellar background. GraDeR merely involves centrifuging the sample in the presence of two gradients of inverse directionality: that of glycerol or other crowding agent increasing downward and that of the low-CMC detergent decreasing downward. The authors demonstrate that GraDeR is suitable for three diverse specimens from across the evolutionary spectrum: a prokaryotic V-type ATPase, a lower-eukaryotic gap junction, and a mammalian FoF1 ATP synthase. The good cryo-EM results are indicative of the technique’s potentially widespread utility.

Beyond cryoEM, GraDeR could conceivably be exploited in X-ray crystallography. In the process of concentrating MP samples for crystallization—to concentrations as high as 60 mg/ml for lipid cubic phase (Caffrey, 2015)—the micelles of low-CMC detergents are often inadvertently concentrated as well. Inordinately high detergent concentrations may hinder crystallization, and GraDeR could be adapted to lower the concentration.

Another potential use for GraDeR in MP biochemistry is in the reconstitution of proteins into lipid vesicles, bilayers, or nanodiscs. Insufficient removal of excess detergent from MP reconstitution samples, especially those of secondary transporters into liposomes, is particularly problematic. This is because the detergent micelles or monomers can easily destabilize the bilayer to dissipate the electrochemical gradient, rendering an uptake or efflux assay useless or, at a minimum, drastically skewing the results. GraDeR offers an alternative means of removing extra detergent.

In conclusion, this paper introduces the innovative but surprisingly simple GraDeR. Although the authors of this paper focus exclusively on its use in cryoEM, we feel that this technique could eventually be expanded to other methods employed to study MP structure and function.

Contributor Information

Satinder K. Singh, Email: satinder.k.singh@yale.edu.

Fred Sigworth, Email: fred.sigworth@yale.edu.

References

  1. Caffrey M. A comprehensive review of the lipid cubic phase or in meso method for crystallizing membrane and soluble proteins and complexes. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2015;71:3–18. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14026843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chae PS, Rasmussen SG, Rana RR, Gotfryd K, Chandra R, Goren MA, Kruse AC, Nurva S, Loland CJ, Pierre Y, et al. Maltose-neopentyl glycol (MNG) amphiphiles for solubilization, stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Nat Methods. 2010;7:1003–1008. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng Y. Single-Particle Cryo-EM at Crystallographic Resolution. Cell. 2015;161:450–457. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung KY, Kim TH, Manglik A, Alvares R, Kobilka BK, Prosser RS. Role of detergents in conformational exchange of a G protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:36305–36311. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.406371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hauer, et al. Structure. 2015;23:xxx–xxx. [Google Scholar]
  6. Popot JL, et al. Amphipols from A to Z. Ann Rev Biophys. 2011;40:379–408. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES