Giant Cell Arteritis: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Management

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation, a life-saving immune response, leads to tissue damage and possible organ failure when unopposed and chronic. Inflammatory destruction of medium and large-sized arteries is particularly dangerous, as injury to the aorta and its major branches poses a threat to survival. Such arteries are the target of the autoinflammatory and autoimmune syndrome giant cell arteritis (GCA), which causes aortitis and vasculitic occlusion of the 2–5^th aortic branch vessels [1–7]. Clinically, the most dreaded complication of GCA is ischemic damage to the optic nerve or acute injury to the aortic wall. In most patients, GCA progresses slowly, demanding sensitive and precise tools to measure disease load and necessitating a spectrum of therapeutic interventions to tailor treatment to the needs of each patient [1–6].

GCA is a chronic disease of the elderly and treatment needs to be aligned with the needs of the patient. Acute complications are anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION), stroke and ischemic damage along the visual axis. Aortic dissection and rapidly progressive aneurysm formation require emergency intervention. Chronic manifestations present as recurrent polymyalgia rheumatica and slowly progressive changes in the subclavian arteries and the aorta. Treatment goals in acute and chronic disease are different. It is currently unknown whether disease remission is achievable and how to balance risks and benefits in 65–85 year old individuals [1–6].

In contrast to many other immune-mediated diseases, the therapeutic spectrum in GCA remains narrow. This may reflect the distinctiveness of pathogenic processes that produce vasculitis. Glucocorticoids have been the therapeutic gold standard and it will be difficult to replace them, given their superb therapeutic efficacy and the need for prompt immunosuppression in newly diagnosed patients. Glucocorticoids are given in high-doses during induction therapy and the vast majority of patients have an excellent response [8, 9]. Challenges arise from the side effects that come with chronic application of glucocorticoids and from the difficulties of proper dose adjustments. Given the potentially devastating complications of GCA, both physicians and patients tend to lean towards glucocorticoid overdosing.

Broadening of the therapeutic armamentarium in GCA has to rely on understanding relevant pathogenic events and on targeting pinnacle disease pathways. Recent progress in comprehending which parts of the immune system are involved promises to widen the tool box and expand the treatment strategies for acute induction therapy as well as chronic maintenance therapy. GCA is a prototypic granulomatous disease, identifying T cells and macrophages as the major drivers of pathology [1–6]. Among T cells, CD4 T cells dominate the cellular infiltrates in the arterial wall layers and intermingle with highly activated macrophages, often called histiocytes. In many, but not all patients, such activated macrophages give rise to multinucleated giant cells (GC). Classically, such multinucleated GC are aligned along the fragmented lamina elastic interna, placement in other parts of the wall is unusual. Additional cells involved in pathogenic processes are of vascular origin, especially myofibroblasts and endothelial cells. A key driver of granulomatous vasculitis are dendritic cells (DC), located in the adventitia, generally at the adventitia-media junction in close proximity to the lamina elastic externa. Such vascular DC hold checkpoint positions and enable CD4 T cells and macrophages (Mo) to assemble in granulomatous lesions in an unusual tissue niche. The blood vessel wall responds with a maladaptive response that eventually leads to luminal occlusion, disturbed blood flow and tissue ischemia.

Cellular Players in GCA

Identifying and characterizing the cellular elements in GCA promises to provide clues towards novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. While there is no doubt that granulomatous lesions are composed of immune cells, it is the vessel wall that directs the immune system towards a restricted tissue niche and vascular cells mount an injury response that results in the clinical complications of GCA. Here, we will summarize what is currently known about the cellular players contributing to arteritis.

Innate Immunity in GCA

Protective and pathogenic immune responses begin with activation of innate immune cells. Neutrophils and eosinophils are rarely encountered in the mural infiltrates and occasionally a few mast cells are seen in tissue sections of inflamed temporal arteries [10, 11]. NK cells have so far not been implicated [12]. But, two types of innate immune cells have central importance in driving disease and, as such, are critical targets for anti-vasculitic therapy, dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages (Mo).

1. Dendritic cells

DC, specifically wall-embedded vascular DC (vasDC), function as sentinel cells in initiating and sustaining vasculitis [13, 14]. Notably, vasDC are present in normal, noninflamed human arteries. Their placement in the proximal adventitia strongly supports the concept that immune surveillance is an important part of arterial function. Even more importantly, the distribution and molecular signature of vasDC are vessel specific, meaning that each medium and large human artery has a unique pattern of vasDC expression [15]. Immune sensing capability defines the vascular tree as part of the innate immune system itself.

In vasculitic lesions, adventitial DC are activated, CD83⁺ and produce T cell-attracting chemokines, such as CCL19 and CCL21 [13, 14]. Normal human arteries, populated by resting vasDC are resistant to vasculitis, suggesting gate keeper function for this immune sentinel. The nature of the DC activator is unknown, but in experimental systems a “danger signal” provided by bacterial products is sufficient to break the DC-imposed tolerance. Interestingly, different danger signals bias the downstream immune responses towards distinct vasculitic patterns [16].

Together, these data support the notion that GCA begins with a danger signal in the adventitia, sensed by vasDC, which triggers a functional switch of the sentinels, resulting in the recruitment of T cells and macrophages that stabilize the local inflammatory response by building granulomas. As the inflammatory reactions move deeper into the wall, DC increase in number and accompany the tissue-invasive lymphocytes. The origin of such amplifying DC is currently unknown.

The pinnacle position of vasDC identifies them as key elements in the disease process and encourages therapeutic targeting of this cell population to hold early steps in vasculitis. Given the vessel-specific distribution of vasDC, better understanding of their regulation may provide valuable insights into the tissue tropism of GCA.

2. Macrophages

GCA is intimately connected to macrophage biology. Macrophages (Mo) are a condition sine qua non to form granulomas. Also, multinucleated GC, recognized as a typical phenomenon of the disease in the term GCA, are offspring of Mo. Finally, the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6, which induces the exuberant acute phase response that is elegantly captured in the highly elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) [9, 17], is a Mo product.

The precursor cells of Mo, monocytes, originate in the bone marrow from a common myeloid precursor, circulate in the peripheral blood and eventually enter the tissue, where they differentiate into Mo. Interestingly, circulating monocytes in patients with GCA are no longer in a resting state, but 60–80% are able to produce the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 [18]. These data suggest a fundamental abnormality in monocyte biology and redirect the focus on “initial triggers” away from the tissue site. Once part of the granulomatous infiltrates in the vessel wall, Mo differentiate into heterogeneous populations which are characterized by core products, such as TGF-β, iNOS or collagenase [19]. A close correlation between positioning in the arterial wall and the product portfolio has given rise to the concept that microenvironmental signals direct the functional lineage commitment of the cells.

Proteomic studies in the serum and plasma of patients with GCA have drawn attention to additional Mo products that are highly elevated. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenic molecule, has been associated with ischemic complications manifesting as visual loss [20]. Earlier studies have assigned VEGF production to multinucleated GC and Mo localized in the vicinity of newly formed microvessels that support the outgrowth of the intimal neotissue blocking blood flow. Also, GCA macrophages are highly efficient in producing the IFN-γ–dependent chemokines CXCL9, 10 and 11 [20]. A recent study has confirmed that GCA Mo are responsive to these chemokines, placing the T cell product IFN-γ into a key position in organizing the cellular recruitment into the arterial wall [21]. Immunohistochemical examination of tissue-residing Mo has revealed that macrophage activation patterns in GCA and primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) are fundamentally different [22]. GCA Mo express more MRP14, whereas PACNS Mo tend to express MRP8, suggesting that GCA and PACNS represent distinct entities within the spectrum of granulomatous vasculitides [22].

Finally, vascular cells are dependent on Mo-derived cytokines and growth factors to mobilize, migrate and deposit extracellular matrix, generating the hyperplastic intimal layer that occludes the vascular lumen. Here again, multinucleated GC and media-homing Mo are the cellular source of PDGF and FGF [23], driving the maladaptive response-to-injury of the artery that is under attack by the immune system.

Overall, innate immune cells orchestrate the dysfunctional immune response leading to vasculitis, guide the disease into the mural layers, support vascular cell populations in the all remodeling process and participate in the systemic inflammatory response by producing proinflammatory cytokines. Almost certainly, such innate immune cells are the main target of glucocorticoids and suppression of DC and Mo function is responsible for the prompt therapeutic response during induction therapy of acute GCA. The need for high doses of glucocorticoids calls for therapeutic alternatives and emphasizes a fundamental and persistent abnormality in innate immune regulation underlying GCA.

Adaptive Immunity in GCA

1. B cells

Clinical observations have not supported a direct role for B cells in the pathogenesis of GCA, separating this vasculitic entity from ANCA-associated vasculitis. In contrast to AAV, no autoantibody has been associated with GCA and patients usually lack lymphadenopathy and hypergammaglobulinemia. In general, B cells are a minor cell population in granulomatous infiltrates and in immunohistochemical studies B cells are scarcely detected in temporal artery biopsy specimens [24]. Recent studies have provided evidence that the inflammatory syndrome in untreated GCA is associated with altered distribution of circulating B cells. Specifically, untreated patients have decreased numbers of circulating B cells and the cell numbers normalized after treatment [25, 26]. Also, B cells from GCA patients with active disease had an enhanced capacity for IL-6 production and B-cell activating factor was strongly associated with disease activity [25, 26]. These studies suggest that B cells may contribute to the inflammatory syndrome via IL-6 production, but further studies are required to investigate whether immunoglobulins have a place in pathogenesis.

2. T cells

A dominant cell population in the pathognomic granulomas is CD4 T cells. In line with accumulation of such cells in peripheral tissue lesions, almost all CD4 T cells have switched to a memory phenotype. The close interactions between T cells and DC in the arterial wall infiltrates suggest that T cell priming could occur in the periphery, but formal proof is lacking. Whether the lymphoid microarchitectures build in the adventitia and media of an inflamed vessel have all structural elements to allow for T cell priming, awaits experimental confirmation.

CD8 T cells are infrequent in GCA lesions. Work published more than 20 years ago raised the question whether GCA is associated with CD8 T cell lymphopenia, suggesting as one possibility that CD8 T cell provide protective functions against vasculitic T cell responses [27].

The process of granuloma formation requires T cell help. It is currently unclear whether T cells dedicated to different functional linages could possibly support the initiation and the persistence of granulomatous infiltrates. Previous work has indicated that at least two distinct T cell lineages are present in inflamed temporal arteries [28–30] and that both of these linages may play a distinct role in the disease process. Recent studies suggests that not only Th1 and Th17 cells have vasculitogenic potential, but that other subtypes of CD4 T cells participate in the infiltrates. These findings may enable novel pathogenic concepts, such as multiple different types of antigens functioning as drivers of vascular inflammation.

Here, we will summarize how each helper T cell type contributes to GCA.

2.1 Th1 cells

Th1 cells are known to emerge in IL-12–rich microenvironments and differentiate into effector cells with a defined cytokine production profile. Typically, Th1 cells secrete IFN-γ, IL-2, and GM-CSF. IL-2 is a T cell growth factor, functioning as a feed-forward loop to stabilize Th1 immunity. Among the Th1-derived products, IFN-γ is the most important, with a wide range of regulatory power. Specifically, IFN-γ induces Mo activation and thus holds control over the most important partner in granuloma formation. IFN-γ–activated Mo release chemokines (e.g. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11), secret metalloproteases (MMP, e.g. MMP-2, MMP-9) and provide reactive oxygen species through the respiratory burst [31–33]. IFN-γ turns Mo into producers for angiogenic factors (e.g. VEGF) and growth factors (e.g. PDGF and FGF) [23]. Notably, IFN-γ cooperates with toll-like receptor ligands to initiate a macrophage activation program associated with tissue inflammation. In inflamed temporal arteries, IFN-γ may coactivate Mo that also receive stimulatory signals from danger signals in the tissue microenvironment.

An important aspect of GCA pathogenesis is the formation of multinucleated giant cells (GC). Although often considered an IL-4–dependent process, Mo fusion and multinucleation are equally responsive to IFN-γ [34–38]. In GCA, multinucleated GC serve as a cellular source of numerous cytokines, thus functioning as an important amplification mechanism [39].

Interestingly, IFN-γ–producing Th1 cells are relatively insensitive to glucocorticoid therapy and persist in steroid-treated patients [29, 40] [29, 40]. Evidence has been provided that IL-12 production has a similar tendency to continue despite steroid therapy [29] [29]. This raises the concept that IL-12 and predominance of Th1 cells in GCA patients may derive from a nonphagocytic cell population.

Persistent IFN-γ overproduction is a critical mechanism in the chronicity of disease. Thus, a simple approach to treating chronic GCA could lie in curbing IFN-γ production. However, this suggestion needs to be carefully evaluated. IFN-γ is a cornerstone in immunoprotection, particularly against malignancy and viral infection [41–44]. IFN-γ–dependent immunoprotection is particularly important in the elderly, thus in the patient populations at risk for GCA. Recent data have alerted us to the presence of varicella zoster antigen in inflamed temporal arteries [45, 46]. While the pathogenic role of such local viral antigen remains to be determined, it raises concerns about the competence of anti-viral immunity in GCA patients. Targeting IFN-γ would render patients immunocompromised, possibly more than is acceptable.

2.2 Th17 cells

IL-6, a well-established biomarker of disease activity in GCA, sways T cells to differentiate into Th17 cells. Frequencies of Th17 cells are elevated in untreated patients and Th17 cells are among the lesional T cells. The product portfolio of Th17 cells includes IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, IL-8, and IL-26. Th17 cells cannot produce IL-2, thus fail to self-expand. Accordingly, they account for a relatively small number of T cells, e.g. in healthy controls 0.2% of T cells are Th17 cells, and in untreated patterns this frequency increased to 1.5–2.0% [29]. IL-17 receptors are expressed on several disease-relevant target cells, including Mo, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. It is still unclear which pathogenic processes in the disease lesions are directed by IL-17.

Th17 cells are a typical component of early, untreated disease. They are highly sensitive to glucocorticoids and usually normalize rapidly under treatment.

Low doses of steroids seem capable to control Th17 frequencies. It may be relatively easy to therapeutically target this T cell component and develop novel therapies, but their absence in chronic vasculitis questions how successful this strategy would be in management of chronic disease.

2.3 IL-21–producing CD4 T cell

A recent study has implicated the T cell product IL-21 in the inflammatory cocktail present in vascular lesions [30]. Like the other T cell lineages, the increase in IL-21–producing T cells was easily detectable in the peripheral blood [30]. IL-21 is a pleiotropic cytokine produced by several T helper cell subtypes, specifically Th17 cells, Th9 cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells [47]. IL-21 is not only a critical regulator of Th17 development; it also induces cytotoxicity of CD8 T cells and NK cells [48]. In germinal centers, IL-21–producing Tfh cells are the master regulators of B cell differentiation, representing an essential element of antibody responses. Essentially, IL-21 participates in multiple effector mechanism in protective and pathogenic immunity [48]. Fortunately, IL-21, similar to IL-17, is highly sensitive to glucocorticoid treatment [30]. More precise targeting of IL-21 would require the identification of the producing cell type and a better understanding of which effector pathways are IL-21–dependent.

2.4 Other T cell subtypes in vasculitis

With a growing array of T cells being implicated in the chronic inflammation associated with autoimmune disease, it is to be expected that more and more T cell lineages will be associated with GCA. A novel subset of helper CD4 T cells producing the marker cytokine IL-9, Th9 cells, have recently been recognized to be important in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis [49]. Th9 development is regulated by the lineage-determining transcription factor PU.1. IL-9 has been observed in tissue sections of inflamed temporal arteries [50]. IL-9 was correlated with the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response, measured by ESR and CRP [50]. IL-9 can be produced by an array of inflammatory cells, mostly mast cells, NKT cells and T cells. IL-9–producing mast cells have fostered the concept that IL-9 is important in allergic responses. Currently, the cellular origin of IL-9 in GCA lesions remains undetermined and further studies are needed to clarify its role in the disease process.

Th22 cells represent another novel T cell subset, equipped with the potential to promote chronic, tissue destructive inflammation [51]. Their marker cytokine is IL-22, a member of the IL-10 family of cytokines. Th22 cells are often considered to be siblings of Th17 cells [51]. Several lines of evidence suggest that IL-22 may be a player in starting and maintaining tissue inflammation [51, 52]. Its precise role in GCA remains to be explored.

Vascular Cells in GCA

1. Endothelial cells

Endothelial cells (EC) occupy the immediate interphase between the vessel wall and the immune system. They also are a critical component of the wall-remodeling process, since neovessels provide oxygen for the growing intimal layer. It is currently unknown how many different types of EC are represented in medium and large human arteries. Besides the endothelial layer covering the main lumen, vasa vasorum in the adventitia build a special support system. It is suspected that neovessels supplying the thickening intimal layer originate from the vasa vasorum network and that vasa vasorum provide immune cells access to the tissue niche of the arterial wall. EC heterogeneity in healthy and inflamed temporal arteries and in healthy and inflamed aortas is suspected, but experimental data are lacking.

In other vascular diseases, specifically atherosclerosis, dysfunction of EC is considered pathognomic. In GCA patients, EC function is similarly abnormal [53]. EC in the inflamed arteries express high levels of endothelin, suggesting their activation [54]. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies are sometimes detected in the sera of GCA patients, and those antibodies may induce EC injury [55]. A recent study shows that serum amyloid A protein (SAA), one of the many acute phase reactants elevated in GCA patients, induces proliferation of EC, leading to myofibroblast outgrowth and angiogenesis [56]. It would be important to understand why SAA could have such a role in highly selected arteries, whereas other vascular territories are completely spared.

2. Smooth muscle cells

The most important cell type in the wall remodeling process is the vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC). Current paradigm holds that vessel wall injury triggers a phenotypic switch, turning contractile VSMC into synthetic myofibroblasts. Such dedifferentiated cells acquire migratory and invasive functions, leave the adventitia and media and move across the destroyed lamina elastic interna to form the matrix-rich hyperplastic intima. VSMC in GCA arteries are known to actively participate in the inflammatory response. They upregulate the enzyme aldose reductase to protect themselves and neighboring cells from oxidative damage [57]. Also, they actively interfere with immune cell recruitment. By expressing NOTCH ligands, they are able to interact with NOTCH receptors on CD4 T cells, thus selectively interacting with vasculitogenic T cells [40]. This NOTCH-NOTCH ligand pathway has been implicated in the amplification of vasculitis and blockade of this signaling pathway can effectively suppress vascular inflammation [40]. A recent study has pointed out yet another critical function of VSMC. By producing neurotrophins, wall-residing VSMC can influence the neuronal regulation of blood vessels [58]. Neurotrophins control the survival, the development and the function of neurons, which could possibly provide both proinflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory signals. Further studies are needed to define the precise origin of the cells that form the neointima and to characterize the molecular pathways that induce myofibroblast mobility and matrix production. A better understanding of VSMC biology holds great promise to develop entirely new therapeutic approaches in GCA.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathogenic concept of GCA has evolved. Multinucleated GC and granuloma formation have encouraged speculations about infectious triggers. Also, elastic components of the wall were suspected to elicit fusion of highly stimulated macrophages, unable to digest the inert parts of the elastic lamina. Clinical management assumed that the vasculitis is a self-limited syndrome that requires about two years of immunosuppression. This simplified approach has been replaced with the more complex concept that immune stimulators other than indigestible elastic fibers or persistent microbes may give rise to persistent granulomatous vasculitis.

As in most inflammatory diseases, a broad array of inflammatory cytokines participate in GCA. The question remains whether one or two of such proinflammatory mediators hold pinnacle positions and are key disease drivers. Blocking TNF-α, a highly successful intervention in rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, has no steroid-sparing effects in GCA [59].

Separating it from other inflammatory conditions, GCA is associated with an intense acute phase response. Highly elevated ESR and CRP levels suggest a role for IL-6, a potent upstream inducer of CRP. One of the predictable therapeutic effects of glucocorticoids is the prompt suppression of IL-6 production. This aspect of glucocorticoids can likely be replaced with more targeted therapeutic approaches. IL-6 may also be involved in inducing Th17 cell differentiation, relevant in some stages of disease.

A major lesson from pathogenic studies has been the unexpected diversity of functional T cell subsets in the vascular lesions (Figure 1). T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-17, IL-9 and IL-21 have been described, crossing the boundaries between classical lineage assignments. Of all T cell products, IFN-γ may be the most resistant to therapy, but also represents a key protection and survival factor, particularly in the naturally immunocompromised elderly. The diversity of differentiated T cells in the vasculitic infiltrates is strongly suggestive for a multi-antigen stimulation and discourages the concept that a single instigator causes GCA. It is equally important in the development of novel therapeutic strategies. A cocktail of immunomodulators will be required to manage the abnormal adaptive immunity in GCA.

Figure 1. Pathogenic pathways in GCA.

Healthy medium and large arteries are composed of three layers; the endothelial cell (EC) barrier in the intima, sheets of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) in the media and the adventitial support layer with vascular dendritic cells (vasDC) and vasa vasorum networks. Inflammatory cascades of early GCA start with a breakdown of the immune privilege in the adventitia, triggered by activation and immobility of vasDC. Resulting chemokine production recruits various lineages of T cells and macrophages. T cells committed to at least 4 functional lineages have been identified by their marker cytokines: IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-9 and IL-21. A common principle of recruited T cells and macrophages is their arrangement in granulomas, stabilizing lymphoid microstructure that optimize inflammation. The artery, represented by VSMC, EC and fibroblasts, responds with a maladaptive repair program, leading to medial thinning and lumen-occlusive hyperplastic intima.

Table 1 outlines the cellular players in GCA and how current and future therapies can target their pathogenic role. Several clinical trials are currently exploring the use of cytokine blockers and of costimulatory inhibitors. Some currently available T cell immunosuppressants are used empirically in patients requiring long-term therapy, but their use has not been investigated in appropriately designed clinical trials. These include azathioprine, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus and others. On the horizon are novel treatment approaches that may be able to reach more than a single vasculitogenic cell population [60–64]. As the clinical complications of GCA are related to the vascular wall remodeling, EC and VSMC emerge as intriguing targets. Of particular interest are cell-based therapies, which may be able to harness the immune system’s natural anti-inflammatory potential to bring to a halt a damage-inducing immune response and induce disease remission.

Table 1. Approaching disease complexity with a multipronged and individualized therapeutic strategy.

A diverse set of cellular players in GCA requires a diverse set of therapeutic approaches. The versatility of glucocorticoids reflects their ability to dampen but not eliminate multiple pathogenic aspects of GCA. Heterogeneity of vasculitogenic T cells calls for an array of immunosuppressants. New therapeutic approaches need to be developed to target the inappropriate remodeling process of the arterial wall.

The superior therapeutic efficacy of glucocorticoids almost certainly lies in their pleotropic effects, targeting innate as well as adaptive immune cells. This desirable aspect of glucocorticoids will be difficult to replace with a single or even a few immunomodulatory medications. Nature had millions of years to develop such a versatile immunosuppressant as glucocorticoids. It will take some time to design a cocktail of man-made immunomodulators that have equal efficacy.

OPINION STATEMENT.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic inflammatory vasculopathy mediated by pathogenic responses of a diverse array of innate and adaptive immune cells as well as vascular cells. Current therapy relies on broadly immunosuppressant glucocorticoids, which rapidly control systemic inflammation, but fail to eliminate vascular inflammation.

Despite steady growth of the immunosuppressive armamentarium overall, it has been difficult to identify clinically meaningful and steroid-sparing effects of targeted biologic therapies in GCA. Here, we propose that this reflects the multiplicity of pathogenic elements that converge to induce and maintain GCA: (a) GCA is a disease of the elderly, posing additional risks when aggressively disabling immunity. (b) GCA is a chronic disease and persists as smoldering vasculitis. (c) The burden of disease is difficult to measure, complicating adjustments of immunosuppressive therapy. In the absence of objective activity markers, physicians and patients lean towards overutilization of glucocorticoids. (d) Key pathogenic drivers are T cells and macrophages, which assemble in granulomas and are highly diverse in their functional product portfolio. The diversity of vasculitogenic effector functions confounds simple therapeutic targeting. (e) Ultimate vascular complications are dependent on vessel wall cells, requiring therapeutic strategies beyond immunosuppression.

Immediate goals in improving the therapeutic management of GCA should focus on optimizing glucocorticoid dosing to avoid overutilization and on adapting therapy to the needs of the immunosenescent host. Building a spectrum of possible therapeutic targets will enable carefully designed multipronged combination therapies.