Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0157250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157250

Synthetic Lethality of the bfr and mbfA Genes Reveals a Functional Relationship between Iron Storage and Iron Export in Managing Stress Responses in Bradyrhizobium japonicum

Siva Sankari 1, Mark R O’Brian 1,*
Editor: Roy Martin Roop II2
PMCID: PMC4902296  PMID: 27285822

Abstract

An mbfA mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum defective in iron export is sensitive to short term exposure to high levels iron or H2O2. Here, we found that the mbfA strain grown in elevated iron media (100 μM) became resistant to those treatments, suggesting a stress response adaptation. The bfr gene encodes the iron storage protein bacterioferritin, and its expression is derepressed by iron. An mbfA bfr double mutant showed a loss of stress adaptation, and had a severe growth phenotype in high iron media. Moreover, a bfrup allele in which bfr is constitutively derepressed conferred stress tolerance on an mbfA mutant without elevating the iron content in the growth media. The intracellular iron content of the mbfA bfr double mutant was substantially higher than that found in the wild type, even when grown in relatively low iron media (5 μM). Under that condition, iron-responsive gene expression was aberrant in the mbfA bfr strain. Moreover, the double mutant was sensitive to the iron-activated antibiotic streptonigrin. We conclude that MbfA and Bfr work in concert to manage iron and oxidative stresses. In addition, the need for iron detoxification is not limited to extreme environments, but is also required for normal cellular function.

Introduction

The ability of bacteria to sense nutrient availability and adapt accordingly contribute to their success in diverse environments. Iron is an essential nutrient required for many cellular processes. Bioavailability of iron is low in aerobic environment because it is oxidized, and therefore insoluble. High affinity iron acquisition systems are expressed under iron limitation to scavenge the metal. Iron can also be toxic, as it catalyzes the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Thus, metal homeostasis must be maintained.

Because of low bioavailability of iron, studies on the maintenance of iron homeostasis have mostly focused on acquisition of the metal. However, recent work has demonstrated bacterial iron export, and has shown it to be important in homeostatic control. MbfA from Bradyrhizobium japonicum is an inner membrane CCC1 family protein that is expressed under high iron conditions to export the metal from cytoplasm [1]. An mbfA mutant of B. japonicum or Agrobacterium tumefaciens [2] displays elevated iron levels. Derepression of PfeT, a P type ATPase in Bacillus subtilis, results in enhanced growth under high iron condition. PfeT catalyses iron export and the ATPase activity is Fe2+ dependent [3]. Ectopic expression of MdtD of Salmonella typhimurium lowers intracellular iron levels and enhances survival, in cells with elevated iron import [4]. Overproduction of E. coli FetA and FetB decreases intracellular iron content but no transport studies have been shown in this system [5].

Bradyrhizobium japonicum lives as a free-living soil organism or as the endosymbiont of soybean and some other legumes, where it fixes atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia to fulfill the nitrogen requirements of the host. Soils are highly variable ecosystems, and symbiosis represents a niche with specific nutritional requirements. Thus, B. japonicum and other rhizobia must be able to accommodate changes in metal availability. B. japonicum belongs to the α-proteobacteria, a large taxonomic group that occupies diverse niches, including within eukaryotic cells in a symbiotic or pathogenic context. B. japonicum serves as a model system to understand metal metabolism and homeostasis in many α-proteobacterial species [6].

Iron and oxidative stress are intertwined because iron is involved in oxygen chemistry resulting in formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In B. japonicum, an mbfA mutant is sensitive to both high iron and peroxide exposure, presumably due to increased available iron content in cells. Similarly, overexpression of MbfA in Agrobacterium protects the cell against peroxide mediated killing [7]. FetA and FetB of E.coli were identified in a screen for cells exhibiting enhanced H2O2 resistance [5]. In Salmonella, expression of MdtABCD operon is induced by nitric oxide stress, and provides resistance to antibiotics that generate ROS [4].

mbfA is negatively regulated by Irr, the global iron responsive transcriptional regulator in B. japonicum. Irr is stable in cells under iron-limited conditions, but degrades in a heme-dependent manner under iron replete conditions [8]. Irr is also degraded upon exposure to H2O2 [9]. Thus oxidative stress is coordinated with the cellular iron status.

In the present study, we found that an mbfA mutant can be resistant to iron and oxidative stresses under certain conditions, and identified the iron storage protein bacterioferritin as the cellular factor responsible for this protection.

Results

An mbfA mutant grown in high iron medium acquires resistance to iron and hydrogen peroxide stress

MbfA is the major iron exporter in B. japonicum. In a previous study, we demonstrated that an mbfA mutant is sensitive to short term (2 hours) exposure to very high iron (5 mM FeSO4) when they were first grown in standard growth medium which contains 3.7 μM FeCl3 [1]. In the current study, we examined the sensitivity of the mbfA mutant to this iron stress after growth in medium containing 100 μM FeCl3. Cells of the wildtype and the mbfA mutant were grown in medium with 3.7 μM FeCl3 or 100 μM FeCl3 to mid log phase and then treated with 5 mM FeSO4 for 2 hrs or no added iron as a control. Cells were then serial diluted and spotted on non-selective plates to assess cell viability (Fig 1). In contrast to what was observed with cells grown with 3.7 μM FeCl3, the mbfA mutant was resistant to high iron stress and similar to the wildtype when grown in 100 μM FeCl3 (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. Adaptation to high iron and H2O2 stress in an mbfA strain is lost in a mbfA bfr double mutant.

Fig 1

Cells of the wildtype, bfr, mbfA, and mbfA bfr strains were grown in medium supplemented with either 3.7 M μM (L) or 100 μM (H) FeCl3. Cells grown to mid-log phase were either untreated (A), treated with 5 mM FeSO4 (B), or 5 mM H2O2 (C) for 2 hours. Cells were then serial diluted 10−1- to 10−6-fold and spotted onto non-selective plates and grown at 29 C. Each panel represents a single plate, and the image was separated for each strain for clarity of presentation.

We showed previously that the mbfA mutant is also sensitive to short term H2O2 exposure [1]. Here, we compared H2O2 sensitivity of the wildtype and the mbfA mutant strain grown in medium supplemented with 3.7 μM FeCl3 or 100 μM FeCl3. Similar to the observations with iron stress, the mbfA mutant was resistant to a 2 hour exposure to 5 mM H2O2 treatment, when first grown in medium supplemented with 100 μM FeCl3 (Fig 1C). The findings indicate that chronic exposure to an elevated iron level during growth results in adaptation by the mbfA mutant to resist iron and H2O2 toxicity.

The bfr gene encoding bacterioferritin is synthetic lethal with the mbfA gene

We wanted to determine what cellular changes occur in response to growth in 100 μM iron that render the mbfA strain resistant to iron and oxidative stresses. The mbfA gene is co-regulated with the bfr gene encoding bacterioferritin, and both genes are derepressed under high (100 μM) iron conditions [10]. Both genes are repressed by the transcriptional regulator Irr, which binds their promoters with over 200-fold greater affinity than other Irr regulon gene promoters. As a result, full derepression of mbfA and bfr occurs at higher iron concentrations than for other Irr-repressed genes [10]. In addition, the bfr gene is expressed more highly in an mbfA strain than the wild type when grown in media supplemented with 100 μM iron [1]. Thus, it is plausible that bacterioferritin has an iron storage capacity that can compensate for the iron export defect when cells are grown in high iron media.

To test this, we constructed an in-frame deletion of the bfr gene in both wild type and mbfA mutant backgrounds, and tested the sensitivity of the mutants to exposure to high iron and H2O2 exposure. The bfr mutant had a similar phenotype as the wild type with respect to viability in response to a 2 hour exposure to 5 mM FeSO4 or 5 mM H2O2 when first grown under 3.7 μM or 100 μM iron conditions (Fig 1B and 1C). However, the mbfA bfr double mutant was extremely sensitive to exposure to high iron or H2O2 (Fig 1A and 1B). The synthetic lethality of the bfr gene with mbfA suggests that elevated bfr expression caused by growth in 100 μM iron confers resistance to iron and H2O2 in the mbfA mutant strain. Interestingly, the double mutant was also sensitive to these stresses when grown in normal iron media, suggesting that bacterioferritin mitigates the effects of the MbfA defect under that condition even though bfr is expressed at a lower level.

Overexpression of the bfr gene rescues mbfA mutant phenotypes without elevating iron in the growth medium

If up regulation of the bfr gene in response to growth in 100 μM Fe is responsible for rescuing the mbfA mutant phenotypes, then elevating bfr expression by some other method should yield similar results even at lower iron concentrations. The bfrup gene contains a modified promoter that binds Irr with lower affinity [10]. As a result, the bfr gene is more derepressed at lower iron concentrations, which was confirmed here by measuring bfr mRNA by qPCR in the wild type and bfrup strains. (Fig 2A). An mbfA bfrup mutant was constructed, and expression of the bfr gene was elevated relative to the wild type (Fig 2A). Cells grown in GSY media (3.7 μM Fe) were analyzed for sensitivity to high iron or H2O2 exposure. The mbfA bfrup mutant was much more resistant to H2O2 or high iron exposure than the mbfA mutant, and was similar to the wild type (Fig 2B). These findings show that elevated bfr levels are sufficient to rescue mbfA mutant phenotypes, and further show a functional relationship between the two gene products.

Fig 2. Rescue of mbfA mutant phenotypes by bfr overexpression.

Fig 2

A) Steady state transcript levels of the bfr gene in the wildtype, bfrup, mbfA bfrup and mbfA grown in medium with 3.7 M μM FeCl3 were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The data are expressed as relative starting quantities (SQ) of respective mRNAs normalized to the house keeping gene gapA, and presented as average of three replicates ±SD. An asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to the wild type based on Student’s t test using a confidence level of p<0.01. B) Cells of the bfrup, mbfA bfrup and mbfA were grown in medium supplemented with 3.7 μM FeCl3. Cells grown to mid log phase were either untreated, treated with 5 mM FeSO4 or 5 mM H2O2 for 2 hours. Cells were then serial diluted 10−1 to 10−6 fold and spotted onto non selective plates.

The mbfA bfr double mutant has a severe growth phenotype under high iron conditions

We established that MbfA and Bfr are involved in managing acute exposure to iron and H2O2. We wanted to establish their role in chronic iron stress during growth in liquid medium. We carried out the growth experiments with FeSO4 and sodium citrate rather than FeCl3 to maintain solubility of iron at high concentrations. When grown in media supplemented with 5 μM FeSO4, the mbfA and bfr single mutants and the mbfA bfr double mutant grew similarly to the wild type (Fig 3A). The wild type also grew well in media containing 750 μM FeSO4 (Fig 3B), as did the mbfA and bfr single mutants. However, the mbfA bfr double mutant had a severe growth phenotype under high iron conditions. Thus, MbfA and Bfr are involved in coping with growth under high iron conditions, and each protein can compensate for a defect in the other to maintain normal growth. When grown in medium supplemented with 1.2 mM FeSO4, the bfr mutant grew well, but the mbfA mutant displayed a growth defect. Thus, at this iron concentration, MbfA is required for normal growth, and Bfr activity is not sufficient to detoxify iron.

Fig 3. Growth curves of wild type and mutant strains under various iron conditions.

Fig 3

Growth media were inoculated with 1 × 106 cells/ml of the wildtype (closed circles), bfr (open squares) mbfA (closed diamonds) and mbfA bfr (open triangles) strains. Strains were grown in GSY medium supplemented with either 5 μM FeSO4 (A), 0.75 mM FeSO4 (B), or 1.2 mM FeSO4 (C). Aliquots were taken at the indicated time points and the optical density was measured at 540 nm (OD540). The time points are the average of three biological replicates ± the standard deviation.

MbfA and Bfr are required to maintain iron homeostasis under moderate iron conditions

Thus far, we have examined extreme environmental conditions to assess an equally extreme phenotype, namely cell viability. We wanted to address the roles of MbfA and Bfr under moderate iron conditions, where the mutants remain viable. We examined intracellular iron content in the wild type and mutant cells by ICP-MS grown in media supplemented with no or 5 μM iron. We used FeSO4 rather than FeCl3 for these experiments because we found that the ICP-MS data were more reproducible with FeSO4, possibly due to better solubility.

Under low iron conditions, the iron content of the mbfA and bfr mutants was similar to the wild type, and that of the double mutant was slightly higher (Fig 4). When grown with 5 μM iron, the intracellular iron level in the mbfA strain remained low, similar to the wild type. This observation is consistent with the fact that the mbfA gene is not derepressed at this iron range [10], which was confirmed here (S1 Fig). The mbfA bfr double mutant contained over 3-fold more iron than the wild type or mbfA strain, showing that both gene products are involved in maintaining homeostasis, and that they can compensate for each other. Although the bfr strain contained less iron than the double mutant, it was greater than was found in the wild type. We cannot yet offer an explanation for this.

Fig 4. Total intracellular iron content wild type and mutant strains.

Fig 4

Cells of the wildtype, bfr, mbfA and mbfA bfr strains were grown in GSY medium supplemented with either no added iron (open bars) or 5 μM FeSO4 (closed bars). Total amounts of Fe were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry analysis. The values represented are an average of three runs ± the S.D. An asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to the wild type based on Student’s t test using a confidence level of p<0.01.

MbfA and Bfr are necessary for normal iron-responsive gene expression

Because the mbfA bfr strain had higher iron content when grown in 5 μM iron, we wanted to determine whether iron-responsive gene expression was affected in the double mutant. Irr is the global iron-responsive transcriptional regulator in B. japonicum and related bacteria [11]. Irr accumulates under iron limitation, but degrades in response to the metal ([12] and Fig 5A). We monitored Irr levels by Western blot analysis in cells of the wild type, mbfA, bfr and mbfA bfr strains grown in media supplemented with 0 or 5 μM FeSO4 (Fig 5A). Irr levels were high in all strains grown under low iron conditions. Wild type cells grown with 5 μM FeSO4 contained low but detectable levels of Irr, which was also observed for the bfr and mbfA single mutants. However, Irr was nearly undetectable in the mbfA bfr double mutant, even upon long exposure of the blot. This suggests that the total iron content correlates with the regulatory pool that controls Irr content.

Fig 5. Aberrant regulation of iron-dependent gene expression.

Fig 5

A)Western blot analysis of Irr was performed on wildtype, bfr, mbfA and mbfA bfr strains grown in GSY medium supplemented either with no added iron (-) or 5 μM FeSO4 (+). The protein was detected using anti-Irr antibodies. The same blot was exposed for either 20 secs (upper panel) or 100 secs (Irr long), lower panel). GroEL was used as a control for a protein not regulated by iron, and it was detected using anti-GroEL antibodies. 15 μg of protein were loaded per lane. B) Cells of the wildtype, bfr, mbfA and mbfA bfr strains were grown in GSY medium supplemented with 5 μM FeSO4. The steady-state transcript levels of leuC, sdhC, acnA and sufC were analyzed by qualitative real-time PCR. The data are expressed as relative starting quantities (SQ) of respective mRNAs normalized to the housekeeping gene gapA and are presented as average of three replicates ± S.D (error bars). An asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to the wild type based on Student’s t test using a confidence level of p<0.01.

The consequences of very low Irr levels in the mbfA bfr double mutant strain were readily observable in expression of Irr-regulated genes. sufA, sdhC, leuC and acnA are genes repressed by Irr [1]. mRNA levels of these genes were 2- to 3-fold higher in the mbfA bfr double mutant than was observed in the wild type, and also higher than was found in either of the single mutants (Fig 5B). We note that in a previous study [1], the mbfA mutant displayed both high iron content and aberrant gene expression. However, in that study, cells were grown in 20 μM or 100 μM iron rather than the 5 μM used here. The observations reinforce the conclusion that iron export and storage work in concert for normal iron-responsive gene expression.

The mbfA bfr double mutant is sensitive to the iron activated antibiotic streptonigrin

Streptonigrin is a quinone containing antibiotic, whose antimicrobial activity is affected by intracellular iron availability [13]. When grown in medium with 5 μM FeSO4 and then treated with streptonigrin (dissolved in DMSO), the mbfA bfr double mutant was highly susceptible to killing compared to the wildtype or the single mutants (Fig 6). Cells treated with equal volume of DMSO did not show any difference in sensitivity. This shows the compensatory role of Bfr and MbfA in maintaining the iron content and in turn protection against antimicrobial activity of streptonigrin.

Fig 6. Sensitivity of the double mutant strain to streptonigrin: Cells of the wildtype, bfr, mbfA and the mbfA bfr strains were grown in GSY medium supplemented with 5 μM FeSO4 and treated with either 200 μg/ml of streptonigrin, or equal volume of DMSO for 26 hours.

Fig 6

Cells were then spotted on non-selective plates. Untreated cells are spotted as an additional control.

Evidence for interaction between Bfr and the N-terminal domain of MbfA

MbfA has an N-terminal ferritin-like domain (FLD) that dimerizes in solution [1]. Similarly, bacterioferritin functions as an oligomer. This raises the possibility that MbfA and Bfr physically interact with each other at their respective ferritin-like domains. To address this, a bacterial two hybrid assay was carried out [14] in which Bfr and the MbfA FLD were expressed as fusion proteins with domains of adenylate cyclase. Interactions restore adenylate cyclase activity, which was measured as β-galactosidase activity (Fig 7). Expression of one fusion protein alone in E. coli strain BTH101 yielded very low activity, similar to the strain harboring vectors without inserts. However, expression of T25-Bfr and T18-MbfA together resulted in high β-galactosidase (Fig 7). These finding suggest that Bfr and MbfA interact with each other.

Fig 7. Interactions between FLD of MbfA and Bfr in a bacterial two hybrid assay.

Fig 7

β-galactosidase assay was performed on midlog phase grown cells of BTH101 cells harboring pKT25 and pUT18C (T25 and T18), pKT25 and pUT18C-MbfA (T25 and T18MbfA), pUT18C and pKT25-Bfr (T25Bfr and T18) and pKT25-Bfr and pUT18C-MbfA (T25Bfr and 18MbfA). The values represented are an average of three samples± the S.D. (error bars). An asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to the control containing the empty vectors pKT25 and pUT18C based on Student’s t test using a confidence level of p<0.01.

Discussion

In the present study, we found that an iron export mutant of B. japonicum can adapt to brief exposure to very high levels of iron or H2O2 by elevated expression of the bfr gene encoding bacterioferritin. The synthetic lethality of mbfA with bfr argues in favor of a functional relationship between their gene products. It is also consistent with the coordinate control of the two genes by the high affinity of Irr for each promoter, leading to maximal derepression when iron or H2O2 levels are elevated.

A functional link between the export and storage of iron makes sense because both activities presumably reduce active iron in cells. The physical properties of bacterioferritin are well-described [15], but less is known about its role in cells. Bacterioferritin is part of the ferritin family of proteins that also includes Ferritin and Dps. These proteins are dissimilar at the amino acid sequence levels, but share similar architecture, including the ability to oligomerize. Many bacteria contain more than one ferritin family protein, which may hamper the elucidation cellular roles due to functional redundancy. Neisseria gonorrhea appears to have only bacterioferritin, and a bfr mutant is sensitive to oxidative stress [16], whereas E. coli also has ferritin, and a bfr mutant does not have discernible phenotypes [17]. Iron taken up by Erwinia chrysanthemi is found in bacterioferritin, shortly after uptake, but little remains there after 40 minutes [18], suggesting that the protein does not serve as a long term iron reserve. The current work shows clearly that bacterioferritin participates in managing iron and oxidative stresses. However, the weak phenotype of a bfr mutant appears not to be due to compensatory activities of the other putative ferritin family protein in the B. japonicum genome (bll7374 and bll0290), but rather to iron export activity.

A B. subtilis iron export mutant cannot grow in media containing 4 mM iron, but that phenotype is partially suppressed by a second mutation in in the gene encoding the transcriptional repressor PerR [3]. The Dps protein MrgA is derepressed in the perR strain, which rescued the export mutant. Thus, even though B. japonicum and B. subtilis have different exporters and iron storage proteins, the activities are functionally linked, suggesting a broadly applicable bacterial theme.

B. japonicum grows well in liquid media containing 750 μM iron, and our findings show that MbfA or Bfr can manage the high iron level without the other, as observed by the robust growth in a bfr or mbfA mutant, respectively (Fig 3B). The severe growth phenotype of mbfA bfr double mutant under high iron growth indicates that there is not an additional compensatory mechanism. The B. japonicum genome harbors genes encoding other putative ferritin family proteins, but they appear not to play a role under that condition. When the iron content in the media was elevated to 1.2 mM, the mbfA mutant had a growth phenotype, but the bfr mutant did not (Fig 3C). It is likely that the storage protein saturates with iron and reaches a threshold where it can no longer protect cells from iron stress. The effectiveness of MbfA, however, should be limited by the rate at which it can export, and the good growth of the bfr strain even in 1.2 mM iron indicates that MbfA activity is sufficient to maintain viability. Within symbiotic soybean root nodules, it is estimated that the medium surrounding B. japonicum cells ranges from 0.5 mM to 2.5 mM [19]

Although the mbfA bfr mutant had a growth phenotype under high iron or H2O2 exposure, it also displayed phenotypes in a modest iron environment. In particular, the double mutant had elevated iron levels, increased sensitivity to the antibiotic streptonigrin and aberrant iron-responsive gene expression (Figs 4, 5 and 6). These observations show that the need for iron detoxification is not limited to extreme environments, but instead, it is likely to be integral to maintaining iron homeostasis more broadly.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Media

B. japonicum USDA110 is the parent strain used in this study. B. japonicum strains were routinely grown at 29°C in GSY medium as described previously [20]. The actual iron concentration of the unsupplemented medium was 0.3 μM, as determined with a PerkinElmer Life Sciences model 1100B atomic absorption spectrometer.

Construction of strains and plasmids

For creating the bfr mutant, the open reading frame plus 600 bp of flanking DNA was isolated by PCR using genomic DNA as a template and ligated into pBluescript SK2. A deletion removing only the open reading frame was constructed by inverse PCR as described previously [21], and the product was blunt ligated. The resulting flanks were then restriction digested from pBluescript SK2, ligated into the vector pLO1 and introduced into B. japonicum USDA110 by conjugation. Single recombinants were selected based on kanamycin resistance and then screened for sensitivity on growth with 5% (wt/vol) sucrose due to the sacB gene harbored on the plasmid. Double recombinants arising from a selected single recombinant were selected based on sucrose resistance and then screened for kanamycin sensitivity. The bfr deletion in the wildtype was confirmed by the size and sequence of the PCR products using primers in the flanks. The same pLO1 vector was introduced to mbfA mutant background and the same selection criteria was employed to create mbfA bfr double mutant. A pLO1 strain with ICE motif in promoter of bfr substituted by ICE motif of fhuE was made in a previous study [10]. This construct was moved into the mbfA mutant background, and the same selection criteria of single and double recombinants were made to make mbfA bfrup.

Iron and H2O2 Sensitivity Assays

Cells were grown in either 3.7 μM FeSO4 or 100 μM FeSO4 up to mid log phase and treated with either 5 mM FeSO4 or 5 mM H2O2 for 2 hours. Cells were then washed and serially diluted in PBS. The serial dilutions were then spotted on regular GSY plates.

Growth curve analysis

Cells were grown in GSY medium with either 3.7 μM FeSO4, 0.75 mM FeSO4 or 1.2 mM FeSO4 as described in the text. In order to avoid formation of insoluble ferric hydroxides 1 g/l of citrate trisodium dihydrate was added to the GSY medium. Growth rates were analyzed by measuring the optical density of cells at 540 nm at given time intervals until they reached stationary phase.

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000×g for 7 min, washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, and 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4), and resuspended in the same buffer. The protein concentrations were measured by the BCA protein assay (Pierce). 15 μg of protein from each sample were boiled in SDS loading buffer and loaded on 15% polyacrylamide gel, and immuno blotting was carried out. Anti-Irr antibody was used at a dilution of 1:2500. Anti-GroEL (Enzo Life Sciences) was used at a dilution of 1:8000. HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL) was used as secondary antibody, and the blot was detected using the Immobion chemiluminescence system (Millipore).

Quantitative real time PCR

Cells were grown to mid log phase, and RNA was isolated by the hot phenol method as described previously [11]. 1μg of RNA from each strain were used to make cDNA using Bio-Rad cDNA synthesis kit. Quantitative PCRs were performed as described previously [11]. Data were normalized to gapA and are expressed as average of triplicates, with S.D. represented by the error bars.

Metal Content Determination

40 ml of cells were grown in GSY with either no added iron or 5 μM FeSO4. The cells were harvested at mid log phase by centrifugation at 13,000×g for 5 min. The pellets were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer containing 0.1 M EDTA. To remove excess salt, the pellets were washed twice with metal free PBS. Samples were centrifuged and 10 μl were removed for protein estimation by Bradford assay. To lyse the cells completely, the pellets were treated with 100 μl of 70% nitric acid and incubated at 98°C for 3 h. 1 ml of double-distilled metal free water were added to this preparation and centrifuged at 13,000×g for 5 min to remove cell debris. The supernatant was sent for inductively coupled plasma-Mass Spectrometry analysis (Penn State Institutes of Energy and the Environment, State college, Pennsylvania).

Streptonigrin sensitivity assay

Streptonigrin was dissolved in DMSO to make a stock of 10 mg/ml. Cells were grown to mid log phase and Streptonigrin, at a final concentration of 200 μg/mL was added to the medium. Cells were treated with equal volume of DMSO as a control. After 26 hours, cells were collected and spotted on regular GSY plates.

Bacterial two hybrid assay

A bacterial two hybrid system was used as described previously [14] to monitor interactions between Bfr and the N-terminal ferritin-like domain (FLD) of MbfA.

The open reading frame of the bfr gene was ligated into pKT25 to construct a gene encoding a fusion protein of the N-terminal portion adenylate cyclase with Bfr. The FLD ORF was ligated into pUT18C to construct a gene encoding a fusion protein of FLD with the C-terminus of adenylate cyclase. Interaction between the proteins restores adenylate cyclase activity in cells, resulting in cyclic AMP synthesis and activation of the transcriptional regulator CAP. This, in turn, activates the β-galactosidase gene. β-galactosidase activity was measured in E. coli BTH101 cells harboring the plasmids as described [22]. Cells were grown aerobically in LB medium at 30°C until they reached mid log phase. Cells were spun down and resuspended in 800 μl Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4 7H2O, 40 mM NaH2PO4.H2O, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4 7H2O and 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 7·0). One hundred microlitres of suspension, corresponding to 1×108 cells, was used per reaction. The data are represented in Miller units and each value is a mean of triplicate samples corrected for background. Absorbance of o-nitrophenol formed from ONPG by β-galactosidase was recorded at 420 nm and normalized for cell density at OD550.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Steady state transcript levels of mbfA or bfr gene mRNA in wild type cells.

(PDF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health, R01 GM099667.

References

  • 1.Sankari S, O'Brian MR (2014) A bacterial iron exporter for maintenance of iron homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 289:16498–16507. 10.1074/jbc.M114.571562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhubhanil S, Chamsing J, Sittipo P, Chaoprasid P, Sukchawalit R, Mongkolsuk S (2014) Roles of Agrobacterium tumefaciens membrane-bound ferritin (MbfA) in iron transport and resistance to iron under acidic conditions. Microbiology. 160:863–871. 10.1099/mic.0.076802-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guan G, Pinochet-Barros A, Gaballa A, Patel SJ, Arguello JM, Helmann JD (2015) PfeT, a P1B4 -type ATPase, effluxes ferrous iron and protects Bacillus subtilis against iron intoxication. Mol Microbiol. 98:787–803. 10.1111/mmi.13158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frawley ER, Crouch MV, Bingham-Ramos LK, Robbins HF, Wang W, Wright GD, et al. (2013) Iron and citrate export by a major facilitator superfamily pump regulates metabolism and stress resistance in Salmonella Typhimurium. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 110:12054–12059. 10.1073/pnas.1218274110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nicolaou SA, Fast AG, Nakamaru-Ogiso E, Papoutsakis ET (2013) Overexpression of fetA (ybbL) and fetB (ybbM), encoding an iron exporter, enhances resistance to oxidative stress in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 79:7210–7219. 10.1128/aem.02322-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O'Brian MR (2015) Perception and homeostatic control of iron in the Rhizobia and related bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 69:229–245. 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104432 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ruangkiattikul N, Bhubhanil S, Chamsing J, Niamyim P, Sukchawalit R, Mongkolsuk S (2012) Agrobacterium tumefaciens membrane-bound ferritin plays a role in protection against hydrogen peroxide toxicity and is negatively regulated by the iron response regulator. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 329:87–92. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02509.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qi Z, O'Brian MR (2002) Interaction between the bacterial iron response regulator and ferrochelatase mediates genetic control of heme biosynthesis. Mol Cell. 9:155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang J, Panek HR, O'Brian MR (2006) Oxidative stress promotes degradation of the Irr protein to regulate haem biosynthesis in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol Microbiol. 60:209–218. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaggavarapu S, O'Brian MR (2014) Differential control of Bradyrhizobium japonicum iron stimulon genes through variable affinity of the iron response regulator (Irr) for target gene promoters and selective loss of activator function. Mol Microbiol. 92:609–624. 10.1111/mmi.12584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang J, Sangwan I, Lindemann A, Hauser F, Hennecke H, Fischer HM, et al. (2006) Bradyrhizobium japonicum senses iron through the status of haem to regulate iron homeostasis and metabolism. Mol Microbiol. 60:427–437. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hamza I, Chauhan S, Hassett R, O'Brian MR (1998) The bacterial Irr protein is required for coordination of heme biosynthesis with iron availability. J Biol Chem. 273:21669–21674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yeowell HN, White JR (1982) Iron requirement in the bactericidal mechanism of streptonigrin. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 22:961–968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karimova G, Pidoux J, Ullmann A, Ladant D (1998) A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95:5752–5756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carrondo MA (2003) Ferritins, iron uptake and storage from the bacterioferritin viewpoint. EMBO J. 22:1959–1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen C-Y, Morse SA (1999) Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacterioferritin: structural heterogeneity, involvement in iron storage and protection against oxidative stress. Microbiology. 145:2967–2975. 10.1099/00221287-145-10-2967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abdul-Tehrani H, Hudson AJ, Chang YS, Timms AR, Hawkins C, Williams JM, et al. (1999) Ferritin mutants of Escherichia coli are iron deficient and growth impaired, and fur mutants are iron deficient. J Bacteriol. 181:1415–1428. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Expert D, Boughammoura A, Franza T (2008) Siderophore-controlled iron assimilation in the enterobacterium Erwinia chrysanthemi: evidence for the involvement of bacterioferritin and the Suf iron-sulfur cluster assembly machinery. J Biol Chem. 283:36564–36572. Epub 2008/11/08. M807749200 10.1074/jbc.M807749200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wittenberg JB, Wittenberg BA, Day DA, Udvardi MK, Appleby CA (1996) Siderophore-bound iron in the peribacteroid space of soybean root nodules. Plant Soil. 178:161–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Frustaci JM, Sangwan I, O'Brian MR (1991) Aerobic growth and respiration of a δ-aminolevulinic acid synthase (hemA) mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J Bacteriol. 173:1145–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Small SK, O'Brian MR (2011) The Bradyrhizobium japonicum frcB gene encodes a diheme ferric reductase. J Bacteriol. 193:4088–4094. Epub 2011/06/28. JB.05064-11 10.1128/JB.05064-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zubay G, Morse DE, Schrenk WJ, Miller JH (1972) Detection and isolation of the repressor protein for the tryptophan operon of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 69:1100–1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Steady state transcript levels of mbfA or bfr gene mRNA in wild type cells.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES