Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1979 Aug;42(8):715–723. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.8.715

Assessment of cognitive asymmetries in brain-damaged and normal subjects: validation of a test battery.

S Bentin, H W Gordon
PMCID: PMC490304  PMID: 490177

Abstract

A test battery designed to assess cognitive functions normally related to the left and right cerebral hemispheres was validated on 30 patients with unilateral (16 right, 14 left) lesions. The tests were preselected to reflect typical functioning of the hemispheres according to general agreement in the literature. A Cognitive Laterality Quotient (CLQ) was calculated from the difference in performance between the "right" and "left" test batteries and, therefore, reflected the relative functioning attributed to the right and left hemispheres. Using the CLQ measurement and a control group of 30 non-neurological patients matched for age and education, 28 out of 30 brain-damaged patients (93%) were categorised correctly according to side of lesion; the other two were considered to have either abnormal lateralisation (one was left handed) or asymmetrical premorbid cognitive profiles. Using only one (paired) test whose two subparts were designed to vary only slightly in task requirements to measure either right or left functioning, 29 out of 30 patients were correctly categorised. It is suggested that the concept of relative assessment of basic cognitive functions is more fruitful than general assessment of intellectual functions for use in diagnosis and rehabilitation of neurological patients or normal subjects with developmental or acquired behavioural cognitive abnormalities.

Full text

PDF
715

Images in this article

717Image
on p.717
717Image
on p.717

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLACKBURN H. L., BENTON A. L. Simple and choice reaction time in cerebral disease. Confin Neurol. 1955;15(6):327–338. doi: 10.1159/000105372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benton A., Hannay H. J., Varney N. R. Visual perception of line direction in patients with unilateral brain disease. Neurology. 1975 Oct;25(10):907–910. doi: 10.1212/wnl.25.10.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bever T. G. Cerebral asymmetries in humans are due to the differentiation of two incompatible processes: holistic and analytic. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Sep 19;263:251–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb41589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogen J. E., DeZure R., Tenhouten W. D., Marsh J. F. The other side of the brain. IV. The A-P ratio. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc. 1972 Apr;37(2):49–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogen J. E. The other side of the brain. II. An appositional mind. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc. 1969 Jul;34(3):135–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boller F., Howes D., Patten D. H. A behavioral evaluation of brain-scan estimates of lesion size. Neurology. 1970 Sep;20(9):852–859. doi: 10.1212/wnl.20.9.852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CHAPMAN L. F., WOLFF H. G. The cerebral hemispheres and the highest integrative functions of man. Arch Neurol. 1959 Oct;1:357–424. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1959.03840040001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carmon A., Gordon H. W., Bental E., Harness B. Z. Retraining in literal alexia: substitution of a right hemisphere perceptual strategy for impaired left hemispheric processing. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc. 1977 Jul;42(2):41–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carmon A., Nachshon I. Effect of unilateral brain damage on perception of temporal order. Cortex. 1971 Dec;7(4):411–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Renzi E., Spinnler H. Facial recognition in brain-damaged patients. An experimental approach. Neurology. 1966 Feb;16(2):145–152. doi: 10.1212/wnl.16.2_part_1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FOGEL M. L. THE INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT AS AN INDEX OF BRAIN DAMAGE. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1964 Apr;34:555–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1964.tb02225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Faglioni P., Scotti G., Spinnler H. Impaired recognition of written letters following unilateral hemispheric damage. Cortex. 1969 Jun;5(2):120–133. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(69)80023-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harness B. Z., Bental E., Carmon A. Objective instrumental memory and performance tests for evaluation of patients with brain damage: a search for a behavioral diagnostic tool. Isr J Med Sci. 1976 Mar;12(3):215–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Loranger A. W., Goodell H., McDowell F. H., Lee J. E., Sweet R. D. Intellectual impairment in Parkinson's syndrome. Brain. 1972;95(2):405–412. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.2.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nebes R. D. Hemispheric specialization in commissurotomized man. Psychol Bull. 1974 Jan;81(1):1–14. doi: 10.1037/h0035626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oldfield R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PIERCY M. THE EFFECTS OF CEREBRAL LESIONS ON INTELLECTUAL FUNCTION: A REVIEW OF CURRENT RESEARCH TRENDS. Br J Psychiatry. 1964 May;110:310–352. doi: 10.1192/bjp.110.466.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schacter D. L., Crovitz H. F. Memory function after closed head injury: a review of the quantitative research. Cortex. 1977 Jun;13(2):150–176. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(77)80006-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES