Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2016 May 30;18(Suppl 3):iii49. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now073.05

HG-06: RE-IRRADIATION (RE-RT) FOR CHILDREN WITH RELAPSING DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): BETTER SURVIVAL AND BETTER TIME

Maura Massimino 1, Emilia Pecori 1, Elisabetta Schiavello 1, Veronica Biassoni 1, Emanuele Pignoli 1, Barbara Diletto 1, Filippo Spreafico 1, Michela Casanova 1, Roberto Luksch 1, Andrea Ferrari 1, Monica Terenziani 1, Marta Podda 1, Cristina Meazza 1, Serena Catania 1, Stefano Chiaravalli 1, Nadia Puma 1, Stefano Bergamaschi 1, Loris De Cecco 1, Andrea Anichini 1, Manila Antonelli 3, Piergiorgio Modena 2, Francesca Buttarelli 3, Felice Giangaspero 3, Lorenza Gandola 1
PMCID: PMC4903357

Since 2009 we launched a strategy for children with centrally reviewed MRI DIPG diagnosis. Vinorelbine with nimotuzumab–an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-were weekly administered during the delivery of 54 Gy irradiation, 1.8 Gy/fraction daily, and for a total of 12 weeks, thereafter any other week until tumor progression or for two years duration. Since 7/2011 re-RT was offered both in case of local/disseminated progression: for local it consisted of 19.8 G/11 daysfractions; if needed, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) dose was 36 Gy/20 fractions. Of 40 patients treated, 29 had local (24) or disseminated (5) progression and 19 were given local (16) or CS (3) re-irradiation a median 8 months after first radiotherapy (2.5-19 months). Reasons for not re-irradiating the other 10 children were: progression before 7/2011(4), refusal(4), too poor PS(2); progression site were not different in the two groups. Survival after re-irradiation lasted between two weeks-14 months, median 6; a statistically different median OS between the re-irradiated/not-reirradiated children was found, being 16 and 12 months, respectively(P = 0.003). Re-irradiation induced, in 17 radiologically evaluated patients: 9 tumor volume reduction, 3 stable volumes, while 5 had progression; 14 had symptom amelioration and 13 steroid suspension. 8/9 volume reductions were obtained after same response at previous irradiation while one had stable disease after first irradiation. No adverse event occurred. Re-irradiation after progression was a concrete benefit for both OS and quality of patients life with symptom amelioration in 14/19. This option is worth to be offered also in case of disseminated progression.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES