INTRODUCTION: One of the challenges in managing children with DIPG is the lack of non-invasive imaging biomarkers for monitoring response to therapy. Panobinostat is one of the promising drugs for the treatment of DIPG, and has shown anti-tumor effect in a recent in vivo study. This study aimed to develop clinically translatable metabolic imaging biomarkers for assessing the response of DIPG to panobinostat. We hypothesized that levels of hyperpolarized (HP) [1-13C]-lactate, detected by monitoring HP [1-13C]-pyruvate metabolism using 13C MR metabolic imaging, will be modulated in responding DIPG. METHODS: Vehicle- (n = 3) and panobinostat-treated (4 nM for 72hr, n = 2) K27M.H3 mutant DIPG cells were encapsulated in alginate microspheres and loaded in a 5mm NMR tube connected to a perfusion bioreactor system. A mixture of 7.5 µL of [1-13C]-pyruvate, 15mM trityl radical and 1.5mM Gd-DOTA were polarized using a HyperSense system. HP 13C spectra were acquired every 3s for a total of 5 min in a 500 MHz spectrometer using a 30° flip angle. Lactate levels were determined by normalizing the lactate area-under-the-curve (AUC) to the pyruvate AUC and the level of cell viability that was assessed by estimating the amount of β-NTP from 31P spectra. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: HP 13C pyruvate to lactate conversion was reduced in the responding DIPG cells compared to control. Normalized lactate for treated (1.22 ± 0.44) was smaller than normalized lactate for control (4.02 ± 0.93, p = 0.03). The results from this study show that this novel metabolic imaging method may provide a non-invasive surrogate biomarker of response to panobinostat.
. 2016 May 30;18(Suppl 3):iii75. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now073.113
HG-117: ASSESSING THE RESPONSE OF DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA TO PANOBINOSTAT USING HYPERPOLARIZED 13C MAGNETIC RESONANCE METABOLIC IMAGING
Ilwoo Park
1, Adam Elkhaled
1, Xiaodong Yang
2, Renuka Sriram
1, Dave Korenchan
1, John Kurhanewicz
1, Sarah Nelson
1, Sabine Mueller
2,3
Ilwoo Park
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Ilwoo Park
Adam Elkhaled
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Adam Elkhaled
Xiaodong Yang
2Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Xiaodong Yang
Renuka Sriram
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Renuka Sriram
Dave Korenchan
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Dave Korenchan
John Kurhanewicz
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by John Kurhanewicz
Sarah Nelson
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Sarah Nelson
Sabine Mueller
2Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
3Department of Neurology, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Sabine Mueller
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
3Department of Neurology, San Francisco, CA, USA
Issue date 2016 Jun.
© the author(s) 2016. published by oxford university press on behalf of the society for neuro-oncology. all rights reserved. for permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
PMCID: PMC4903377
