Skip to main content
Molecular & Cellular Oncology logoLink to Molecular & Cellular Oncology
. 2015 Feb 25;2(2):e975076. doi: 10.4161/23723556.2014.975076

PKCλ/ι signaling—a common node for normal cellular development and breast oncogenesis

Arindam Paul 1,2,*, Soumen Paul 1,2
PMCID: PMC4905021  PMID: 27308429

Abstract

We recently demonstrated that PKCλ/ι signaling is an important contributor to breast cancer development. Strikingly, PKCλ/ι signaling is also important to balance self-renewal versus differentiation in pluripotent stem cells and is essential for embryonic development. This commentary highlights some key functions of PKCλ/ι signaling that are integral to both normal development and cancer progression.

Keywords: breast cancer, cell, development, ES cells, iPSC, PKClamda/iota, pluripotency, triple negative breast cancer

Abbreviations

DCIS

ductal carcinoma in situ

ESC

embryonic stem cell

EMT

epithelial to mesenchymal transition

IDC

invasive ductal carcinoma

IL1β

interleukin-1 β

iPSC

induced pluripotent stem cell

PSC

pluripotent stem cell

MET

mesenchymal to epithelial transition

PKC

protein kinase C

PKCλ/ι

atypical protein kinase C lamda/iota

PKCζ

atypical protein kinase C zeta

TGFβ

transforming growth factor β

NF-κB

nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

TNBC

triple-negative breast cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and the coexistence of intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity imposes extreme challenges in the development of successful therapy. A single tumor contains multiple cell types and tumors can differ from each other significantly. Considering the similarities between tumor development and embryonic development, intratumor cellular heterogeneity in cancer models is often explained by the existence of cancer stem cell-like or tumor-initiating cell populations. These stem-like tumor initiating cells are implicated in recurrence of the disease after successful initial therapy. In fact, signaling pathways that govern normal cellular differentiation processes are often linked to cancer development, and recent studies suggest that embryonic stem cells (ESCs) share overlapping gene expression signatures, which predict the clinical outcome of cancer patients.1-3 These discoveries indicate that detailed research is required to define and understand the signaling pathways that regulate stem cell populations during normal development as well as tumor progression. Understanding these pathways may lead to the development of more robust therapeutic options for the management of heterogeneous diseases like breast cancer.

Recently, we discovered that protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, especially the functions of the atypical PKC isozymes PKC zeta (PKCζ) and PKClamda/iota (PKCλ/ι), is crucial for balancing self-renewal versus differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs).4-6 We found that inhibition of PKC isozymes maintains self-renewal in ESCs and facilitates reprogramming of differentiated cells toward induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We also observed that PKC inhibition-mediated maintenance of ESC self-renewal and cellular iPSC generation is associated with a molecular signature characteristic of the mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) process. Since the reverse process of MET, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), has been implicated in self-renewal of cancer stem/progenitor cells and tumor invasion,7 we investigated the activity of one of the PKC isozymes, PKCλ/ι, during breast cancer progression8 and found that expression and activation of PKCλ/ι were induced in human invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with triple-negative status compared to non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and normal breast tissue. In addition, metastatic breast cancer, an advanced stage of disease, also showed high levels of PKCλ/ι expression and activation. RNA interference-mediated inhibition of PKCλ/ι signaling dramatically prevented growth, invasion, and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in experimental animal models. These observations highlighted PKCλ/ι signaling as a rational clinical target for breast cancer. Interestingly, PKCλ/ι signaling is therapeutically targetable. Thus, our discovery is highly encouraging since the paucity of targeted therapy for TNBC remains a critical problem in breast oncology.

Another intriguing question in the field of breast cancer is how to predict the progression of invasive disease. Importantly, we described a PKCλ/ι-regulated gene signature that is differentially expressed in normal breast, DCIS, and IDC tissue, and demonstrated that differential expression of this gene signature significantly predicted poor clinical outcome (relapse or death) of breast cancer patients.8 These observations indicate that PKCλ/ι-regulated genes have the promise to predict invasive progression of breast cancer as an independent variable and that specific patterns of gene expression are significantly associated with poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Thus, our discoveries shed light on a very challenging and clinically impactful area of breast cancer and could possibly serve as the starting point for further preclinical evaluation of PKCλ/ι-targeted therapies during invasive progression of breast cancer.

Breast cancer stem cells or tumor initiating cells are resistant to chemotherapy and major research efforts are currently focusing on identifying treatments that shift them toward a more differentiated phenotype, thus making them more susceptible to chemotherapy.9 Interestingly, our study on PKCλ/ι signaling in PSCs indicated that inhibition of PKCλ/ι signaling in these cells allows them to self-renew and inhibits their multilineage differentiation.6 Using breast cancer models we have demonstrated the putative benefits of targeting PKCλ/ι signaling in cancer treatment,8 showing that inhibition of PKCλ/ι signaling is effective for inhibition of tumor progression, at least in animal models. One might imagine that if tumor cells could be restricted at their primary site of origin by inhibiting differentiation processes, the chances of metastasis will be reduced significantly and surgical removal of the primary tumor will be more effective with less fear of recurrence.

We found that functionally active phospho-PKCλ/ι molecules are predominantly localized in the nucleus of breast cancer cells. Cytokines like TGFβ and IL1β could promote phosphorylation of PKCλ/ι and facilitate nuclear translocation of phospho-PKCλ/ι. Furthermore, our global gene expression analysis indicated that PKCλ/ι signaling regulates a number of transcription factors, including NFκB p65, in breast cancer cells. Interestingly, many of these PKCλ/ι regulated transcription factors are indicated to be important for breast cancer progression. Thus, our study identified a TGFβ/IL1β–PKCλ/ι–NFκB p65 signaling axis that appears to be important for acquisition of metastatic potential in breast cancer (Fig. 1).8 The detailed mechanism of this signaling axis and its regulation is yet to be defined. Nevertheless, the nuclear localization event of active PKCλ/ι molecules opens up several possibilities. It is tempting to speculate that functionally active phospho-PKCλ/ι might be directly influencing the cellular transcription program in cancer cells. Future investigations will define how phospho-PKCλ/ι nuclear translocation affects the gene expression program to promote breast cancer progression.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Involvement of PKCλ/ι signaling in invasive progression of breast cancer. Cytokines such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) or interleukin-1 β (IL1βll) can induce phosphorylation (indicated by attached "P") and nuclear translocation of atypical protein kinase C lamda/iota (PKCλ/ι) in invasive breast cancer cells. Active PKCλ/ι signaling regulates the nuclear factor kappa-β p65 (NFκBp65)-mediated transcription program to express genes associated with invasive progression/metastasis of breast cancer.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1. Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, Regev A, Weinberg RA. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet 2008; 40:499-507; PMID:18443585; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ng.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Daley GQ. Common themes of dedifferentiation in somatic cell reprogramming and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2008; 73:171-4; PMID:19150965; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/sqb.2008.73.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kim J, Orkin SH. Embryonic stem cell-specific signatures in cancer: insights into genomic regulatory networks and implications for medicine. Genome Med 2011; 3:75; PMID:22126538; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/gm291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dutta D, Ray S, Home P, Larson M, Wolfe MW, Paul S. Self-renewal versus lineage commitment of embryonic stem cells: protein kinase C signaling shifts the balance. Stem Cells 2011; 29:618-28; PMID:21308862; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/stem.605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rajendran G, Dutta D, Hong J, Paul A, Saha B, Mahato B, Ray S, Home P, Ganguly A, Weiss ML. Inhibition of protein kinase C signaling maintains rat embryonic stem cell pluripotency. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:24351-62; PMID:23846691; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M113.455725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mahato B, Home P, Rajendran G, Paul A, Saha B, Ganguly A, Ray S, Roy N, Swerdlow RH, Paul S. Regulation of Mitochondrial Function and Cellular Energy Metabolism by Protein Kinase C-lambda/tau: A Novel Mode of Balancing Pluripotency. Stem Cells 2014; 32(11):2880-92; PMID:25142417; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/stem.1817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 2008; 133:704-15; PMID:18485877; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Paul A, Gunewardena S, Stecklein SR, Saha B, Parelkar N, Danley M, Rajendran G, Home P, Ray S, Jokar I, et al. PKClambda/iota signaling promotes triple-negative breast cancer growth and metastasis. Cell Death Differ 2014; 21:1469-81; PMID:24786829; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/cdd.2014.62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Prabhakaran P, Hassiotou F, Blancafort P, Filgueira L. Cisplatin induces differentiation of breast cancer cells. Front Oncol 2013; 3:134; PMID:23761858; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fonc.2013.00134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular & Cellular Oncology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES