Abstract
BACKGROUND
Bartonella spp. are neglected fastidious Gram-negative bacilli. We isolated Bartonella henselae from 1.2% of 500 studied blood donors and demonstrated that the bacteria remain viable in red blood cell units after 35 days of experimental infection. Now, we aim to evaluate the possibility of B. henselae transmission by blood transfusion in a mouse model.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Eight BALB/c mice were intraperitoneal inoculated with a 30μLof suspension with 104 CFU/mL of B. henselae and a second group of eight mice were inoculated with saline solution and used as control. After 96 hours of inoculation, the animals were euthanized. We collected blood and tissue samples from skin, liver, and spleen. Thirty microliters of blood from four Bartonella-inoculated animals were transfused into a new group (n=4). Another group received blood from the control animals. B. henselae infection was investigated by conventional and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
RESULTS
Blood samples from all 24 mice were negative by molecular tests though half of the tissue samples were positive by nested PCR in the intraperitoneal Bartonella-investigated animals. Tissues from two of the four mice that received blood transfusions from Bartonella-inoculated animals were also nested PCR positives.
CONCLUSIONS
Transmission of B. henselae by transfusion is possible in mice even when donor animals have undetectable bloodstream infection. The impact of human Bartonella sp. transmission through blood transfusion recipients must be evaluated.
Bartonella spp. are fastidious Gram-negative bacilli with worldwide distribution. They are reemerging and neglected zoonotic agents. These bacteria can cause several human diseases including Peruvian bartonellosis, trench fever, cat scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis, and endocarditis. Bartonella infection can be fatal, especially in immunocompromised patients. Its prevalence among blood donors is unknown, and screening of blood supplies for this pathogen is not routinely performed because the fastidious characteristics of this organism pose a major challenge in reaching a diagnosis.1 Moreover, automated detection is based on CO2 production and Bartonella spp. do not generate sufficient CO2 to give a positive signal.2
The human-specific species Bartonella quintana and Bartonella bacilliformis and the zoonotic cat-related species Bartonella henselae are typically associated with human manifestations. Infection of immunocompetent patients with B. henselae results in cat scratch disease, a typically self-limiting swelling of lymph nodes often associated with fever. In immunocompromised patients infection with B. quintana or B. henselae can develop serious complications with vasoproliferative lesions known as bacillary angiomatosis. Long-term infection with Bartonella spp. can involve skin, liver, spleen, lung, bone, or brain.1, 3
The transmission of Bartonella spp. to humans usually occurs by traumatic contact with infected animals or by blood-sucking arthropods. B. henselae can multiply in the cat flea and persist in flea feces in the environment for at least 9 days.3 Blood transfusion also represents a risk: cats have been experimentally infected with B. henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae by intravenous or intramuscular inoculation with infected cat blood.4 B. bacilliformis human blood transmission has already been documented5 and solid organ transplant recipients can also be infected by Bartonella spp. that may result in fatal outcomes. 1, 6
The fastidious growth characteristics of Bartonella spp. and its capacity to partially evade the host immune system and typically to cause a chronic infection still pose a problem for diagnosis and treatment. The intracellular location, frequent genetic rearrangements, and alteration of outer membrane proteins are considered important for the maintenance of persistent bacteremia.7
After intradermal inoculation the Bartonella infection spreads to a still enigmatic primary infection niche, although it likely includes the vascular endothelium. Inside the mammalian reservoir host, the infection spreads to the blood where bacteria invade red blood cells (RBCs) and may cause a long-lasting intraerythrocytic bacteremia, an hallmark of Bartonella infection.8
Bartonella spp. are able to infect and survive inside RBCs.9 In vitro Bartonella spp. will invade RBCs, multiply within, and persist for the lifetime of the infected host cell.8 Previous studies from our group using transmission electron microscopy and culture isolation have documented the ability of B. henselae to survive in stored blood for 35 days of storage at 4°C.10 This study was considered important to include Bartonella spp. as a pathogen with risk of transmission by transfusion.11 Ruiz and colleagues12 also demonstrated the ability of B. bacilliformis to survive long periods of time in blood samples stored at 4°C.
Allogenic blood transfusion can be a source of bloodstream infection.13 Approximately 13,785,000 units of RBCs and whole blood were transfused in 2011 only in the United States.14 In 2012, a total of 3,127,957 transfusions were performed in Brazil.15 The screening of bacterial contamination in donated blood components is a challenge since the initial bacteremia can be extremely low and difficult to detect. Efficient and rapid laboratory tests are not available.16
Bartonella transmission was reported in two accidental percutaneous punctures in veterinarians with contaminated animal blood.17, 18 Recently, we isolated Bartonella spp. from 1.2% of 500 Brazilian blood donors and demonstrated B. henselae DNA in blood samples of 3.2% of these donors.1 We hypothesized that B. henselae could cause infection in a mouse model taking blood from a Bartonella-bacteremic donor to a healthy recipient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
The experiments were conducted using 24 isogenic, female, 8-week-old, BALB/c mice (20–22 g of weight). All the experimental protocols were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Campinas.
Bacterial suspension
A bacterial suspension was prepared using B. henselae (Houston 1, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD; ATCC 49882T) with 104 colony forming bacterium units (CFU) concentration in 0.9% NaCl.
Experimental design and transfusion
An overview of the experimental performed procedures is presented in Fig. 1. Eight mice were infected by intraperitoneal inoculation with 30μL of a suspension with 104 CFU/mL B. henselae. Eight control mice were inoculated with the same volume of saline. After 96 hours, four Bartonella-inoculated and four control mice were euthanized with overdose of thiopental. We collected blood and tissue fragments of skin, liver and spleen. We collected blood in sodium heparin tubes from the other four Bartonella-inoculated animals and immediately transfused 30μL, by injection in the ocular venous plexus, into a new group of mice (n=4) that were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine (150 mg/Kg/10 mg/Kg). The same blood collection and transfusion procedures were performed from saline-inoculated mice to a second set of uninfected animals used as control group (n=4). On the fourth day post transfusion, the animals were euthanized with pentobarbital and we collected blood samples and skin, liver, and spleen fragments. We did not observe any clinical signs in infected animals.
Fig. 1.
Animal infection and samples collection scheme
Polymerase chain reaction screening
DNA from whole blood and from skin, liver, and spleen fragments were extracted using Bacteria DNA mini kit (RTP, Stratec Molecular) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were tested by genus specific conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting 16S to 23S ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer.19
We also performed B. henselae species-specific nested PCR targeting ftsZ region using primers previously described.20 To avoid contamination, these techniques were performed as described by Pitassi and colleagues.
RESULTS
Our sensitivity in conventional PCR was 50 copies/mL and in nested PCR it was 10 copies/mL. In two of the four animals inoculated intraperitoneally with a B. henselae suspension, one liver and two spleen fragments were B. henselae positive by nested PCR. Two of the four animals that received blood transfusion from Bartonella-intraperitoneal inoculated mice also had positive spleen nested PCR, even though blood molecular tests were negative to B. henselae from the 24 animals (Table 1).
Table 1.
Diagnosis results of the molecular techniques used to detected bartonella infection
| Control-inoculated (IP) *# | Bartonella-inoculated (IP)*# | Bartonella-tranfused (IV)*+ | Control-transfused (IV) *+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Convencional PCR | Blood | 0/8 | 0/8 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
| Skin | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
| Liver | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
| Spleen | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
|
| |||||
| Nested PCR | Blood | 0/8 | 0/8 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
| Skin | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
| Liver | 0/4 | 1/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
| Spleen | 0/4 | 2/4 | 2/4 | 0/4 | |
No. of positive samples/total of samples tested
IP: Intraperitoneal
IV: Intravenous
DISCUSSION
It is estimated that Bartonella spp. bacteremia in asymptomatic subjects is approximately 10 CFU/μL blood, which may be below the detection limit of most conventional or real-time PCR assays.21 We were able to detect tissue infection only using nested PCR, which suggest slow bacteremia once nested PCR is admittedly more sensitive than conventional PCR.20
B. henselae typically causes self-limiting, asymptomatic infection in humans, but, for some individuals, the bacteremia can become chronic and sometimes the infection can be fatal.1 Stramer and colleagues 11, 22 describe the potential threat of emerging infectious disease agents to transfusion safety and our data indicate that Bartonella spp. could fall into that category. Other Bartonella-related organisms such as Borrelia burgdorferi, ehrlichiae, and Rickettsia rickettsiihad biologic plausibility of blood transfusion transmission. Despite this, these agents have been conclusively documented only for Babesia sp. (>20 cases) and R. rickettsia (one case).23
Bartonella spp. have the ability to course with subclinical chronic infection. Because of the slow doubling time of Bartonella spp. manifestation of bartonellosis in a patient that has been transfused with Bartonella-infected blood could occur much later and therefore not be linked with the transfusion procedure. These data reinforce that most transfusion transmissions with this bacterium are underrecognized.
B. henselae transmission through transfusion blood had already been demonstrated in cats.24 This study shows that transmission of B. henselae by transfusion is possible in mice even when the blood of the donor animals had no detectable bacteremia. We could not detect, by conventional or nested PCR, B. henselae in the blood of animals at day 4 post intraperitoneal inoculation with B. henselae. These data reinforce the possibility of B. henselae infection by blood transfusion and that blood-negative PCR does not exclude the possibility of infection by this bacterium.
Acknowledgments
We thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for their financial support (2012/22340-5) to MNS, CAPES PVE 2012/2042 to PENFV, and NIH UO1 HL117664 to KG.
We thank the staff of the Life Sciences Core Facility (LaCTAD) from University of Campinas (UNICAMP), for their assistance.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest
References
- 1.Pitassi LH, de Paiva Diniz PP, Scorpio DG, et al. Bartonella spp. bacteremia in blood donors from Campinas, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson BE, Neuman MA. Bartonella spp. as emerging human pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:203–19. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bouhsira E, Franc M, Boulouis HJ, et al. Assessment of persistence of Bartonella henselae in Ctenocephalides felis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:7439–44. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02598-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abbott RC, Chomel BB, Kasten RW, et al. Experimental and natural infection with Bartonella henselae in domestic cats. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;20:41–51. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9571(96)00025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maguiña VC. Nuevos Aspectos de Una Vieja Enfermedad. Lima: A.F.A. Editores Importadores; 1998. Bartonellosis o Enfermedad de Carrion. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Psarros G, Riddell J, Gandhi T, et al. Bartonella henselae infections in solid organ transplant recipients: report of 5 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2012;91:111221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31824dc07a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guptill L. Bartonellosis. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:347–59. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harms A, Dehio C. Intruders below the radar: molecular pathogenesis of Bartonella spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:42–78. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05009-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pitassi LH, Cintra ML, Ferreira MR, et al. Blood cell findings resembling Bartonella spp. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2010;34:2–6. doi: 10.3109/01913120903372761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Magalhães RF, Pitassi LH, Salvadego M, et al. Bartonella henselae survives after the storage period of red blood cell units: is it transmissible by transfusion? Transfus Med. 2008;18:287–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2008.00871.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stramer SL, Hollinger FB, Katz LM, et al. Emerging infectious disease agents and their potential threat to transfusion safety. Transfusion. 2009;49(Suppl 2):1S–29S. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruiz J, Silva W, Pons MJ, et al. Long time survival of Bartonella bacilliformis in blood stored at 48C. A risk for blood transfusions. Blood Transfus. 2012;10:563–4. doi: 10.2450/2012.0152-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brecher ME, Hay SN. Bacterial contamination of blood components. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:195–204. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.1.195-204.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Whitaker BI, Hinkins S. The 2011 National Blood Collection and Utilization Report. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Hospitalar e de Urgência. Caderno de informação: sangue e hemoderivados. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 16.McDonald CP. Bacterial risk reduction by improved donor arm disinfection, diversion and bacterial screening. Transfus Med. 2006;16:381–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00697.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin JW, Chen CM, Chang CC. Unknown fever and back pain caused by Bartonella henselae in a veterinarian after a needle puncture: a case report and literature review. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:589–91. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oliveira AM, Maggi RG, Woods CW, et al. Suspected needle stick transmission of Bartonella vinsonii subspecies berkhoffii to a veterinarian. J Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:1229–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Diniz PP, Maggi RG, Schwartz DS, et al. Canine bartonellosis: serological and molecular prevalence in Brazil and evidence of co-infection with Bartonella henselae and Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii. Vet Res. 2007;38:697–710. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2007023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kawasato KH, de Oliveira LC, Velho PE, et al. Detection of Bartonella henselae DNA in clinical samples including peripheral blood of immune competent and immune compromised patients by three nested amplifications. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2013;55:1–6. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652013000100001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Breitschwerdt EB, Maggi RG, Chomel BB, et al. Bartonellosis: an emerging infectious disease of zoonotic importance to animals and human beings. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2010;20:8–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2009.00496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stramer SL. Current perspectives in transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases: emerging and re-emerging infections. ISBT Sci Ser. 2014;9:30–6. doi: 10.1111/voxs.12070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McQuiston JH, Childs JE, Chamberland ME, et al. Transmission of tick-borne agents of disease by blood transfusion: a review of known and potential risks in the United States. Transfusion. 2000;40:274–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40030274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kordick DL, Breitschwerdt EB. Relapsing bacteremia after blood transmission of Bartonella henselae to cats. Am J Vet Res. 1997;58:492–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

