Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2016 May 24;84(6):1785–1795. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01440-15

Cellular Microbiology of Mycoplasma canis

Dina L Michaels a, Jeffrey A Leibowitz a, Mohammed T Azaiza a, Pollob K Shil a, Suzanne M Shama a, Gerald F Kutish b, Steven L Distelhorst c, Mitchell F Balish c, Meghan A May d, Daniel R Brown a,
Editor: C R Roye
PMCID: PMC4907131  PMID: 27045036

Abstract

Mycoplasma canis can infect many mammalian hosts but is best known as a commensal or opportunistic pathogen of dogs. The unexpected presence of M. canis in brains of dogs with idiopathic meningoencephalitis prompted new in vitro studies to help fill the void of basic knowledge about the organism's candidate virulence factors, the host responses that it elicits, and its potential roles in pathogenesis. Secretion of reactive oxygen species and sialidase varied quantitatively (P < 0.01) among strains of M. canis isolated from canine brain tissue or mucosal surfaces. All strains colonized the surface of canine MDCK epithelial and DH82 histiocyte cells and murine C8-D1A astrocytes. Transit through MDCK and DH82 cells was demonstrated by gentamicin protection assays and three-dimensional immunofluorescence imaging. Strains further varied (P < 0.01) in the extents to which they influenced the secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and the neuroendocrine regulatory peptide endothelin-1 by DH82 cells. Inoculation with M. canis also decreased major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) antigen expression by DH82 cells (P < 0.01), while secretion of gamma interferon (IFN-γ), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and complement factor H was unaffected. The basis for differences in the responses elicited by these strains was not obvious in their genome sequences. No acute cytopathic effects on any homogeneous cell line, or consistent patterns of M. canis polyvalent antigen distribution in canine meningoencephalitis case brain tissues, were apparent. Thus, while it is not likely a primary neuropathogen, M. canis has the capacity to influence meningoencephalitis through complex interactions within the multicellular and neurochemical in vivo milieu.

INTRODUCTION

Mycoplasma canis infects many mammalian hosts but is usually thought of as a commensal or opportunistic cofactor in respiratory or urogenital tract diseases of dogs (1). We found unexpectedly that M. canis was also detectable by culture or PCR in a majority of brain tissue specimens in a retrospective case-control study of canine granulomatous meningoencephalitis (ME) (GME) and necrotizing ME (NME) (2). The presence of M. canis in brain tissue was associated with both GME and NME (both P < 0.05, as determined by a χ2 test). The clinical signs of this common idiopathic neurological disease of dogs include seizures, proprioceptive deficits, circling, and blindness. Immunosuppressive therapy may be palliative, but the syndrome is progressive and uniformly fatal (3). The extensive search for a presumed viral cause of canine GME and NME has been fruitless (4).

In humans, bacterial meningitis and encephalitis are multifactorial lethal infections with often severe sequelae for survivors. New detection methods have shown that the variety of bacteria associated with human ME is much more extensive than usually appreciated (59). Additional animal models of bacterial ME are necessary to study this broader spectrum of pathogens (10). Since a possible association between M. canis and canine ME was discovered, our objective has been to help fill the void of basic knowledge about the organism's virulence factors, the host responses that it elicits, and its potential roles in pathogenesis. Our working hypotheses were that M. canis is capable of evoking host cell responses that favor dissemination from mucosal surfaces to secondary sites of infection, possibly in a strain-dependent fashion, and also that, regardless of how it might reach those sites, the presence of M. canis there modulates inflammation and direct injury to host cells. Understanding this potential can be expected to help evaluate the cause of canine ME and other diseases.

(Portions of these data were presented in abstract form at Congresses of the International Organization for Mycoplasmology [90, 91].)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mycoplasma strains and cultivation.

Strain PG14T of M. canis (ATCC 19525) was first isolated from the throat of a normal dog (11). Strains UF31, UF33, LV, 5, 26, Cal, and Mara were first isolated from vaginal swabs of dogs without ME (12). Strains UFG1, UFG2, UFG3, and UFG4 were isolated from frozen brain tissues from cases of canine NME (2). Mycoplasma cynos strain H-831T (ATCC 27544) was first isolated from the lung of a dog with pneumonia (13). Mycoplasma arginini strain G230T, Mycoplasma bovigenitalium strain PG11T, Mycoplasma edwardii strain PG24T, Mycoplasma maculosum strain Skotti B, Mycoplasma molare strain H542T, Mycoplasma opalescens strain MH5408T, and Mycoplasma spumans strain PG13T, representing other species that have been isolated from dogs (1), were obtained from The Mollicutes Collection. All strains were propagated under standard conditions (14) in ATCC 988 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) and glucose or arginine. Stock culture density expressed in CFU was determined by serial dilution and colony counting after 5 to 7 days of incubation.

Scanning electron microscopy.

M. canis strain PG14T cells were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as previously described (15), with minor modifications. Briefly, glass coverslips were placed into wells of a 24-well plate. In each well, 100 μl of an M. canis stock was inoculated into 400 μl SP-4 broth supplemented with 3% gelatin. After 3 h at 37°C, coverslips were fixed for 30 min at room temperature in 1.5% glutaraldehyde–1% paraformaldehyde–0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.2), rinsed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.2) five times for 10 min, and dehydrated through a series of ethanol washes from 25% to 100% ethanol. The coverslips were then critical-point dried and gold coated. Images were viewed on a Zeiss Supra 35 (full-frame E-mount, Gold series) variable-pressure scanning electron microscope operating at 4 kV.

Anti-M. canis polyclonal antibody production, purification, and validation.

Polyclonal antisera against whole-cell lysates (16) of M. canis strains PG14T, UF33, and UFG1 were generated individually in rabbits. Antiserum production was performed by Lampire Biological Laboratories with approval of its Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The protocol consisted of initial subcutaneous inoculation with lysate plus complete Freund's adjuvant, followed by boosters of lysate plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Seroconversion and strain cross-reactivity were assessed by standard indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods. All nine homologous and heterologous antigen-antiserum combinations were examined.

Total IgG was then purified from each antiserum by circulation through Sepharose-coupled protein G affinity chromatography columns according to procedures recommended by the supplier (catalog no. 17-0618-05; GE Healthcare). For each antiserum, eluate fractions with peak A280 values were pooled, dialyzed against 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then desalted and concentrated to a final protein concentration of 15 mg/ml. A portion of each preparation was labeled with biotin according to procedures recommended by the supplier (catalog no. PI21329, PI89889, and PI28005; Pierce) for use as immunohistochemical probes. The working dilutions of the biotinylated probes were assessed by standard direct ELISA methods. All nine homologous and heterologous antigen-probe combinations were examined.

Host cell sources and cultivation.

Canine MDCK epithelial cells, first isolated from the kidney of a normal dog (17); canine DH82 histiocytes, first isolated from a dog with malignant histiocytosis (18); and murine C8-D1A type I astrocytes, first isolated from the cerebellums of normal C57BL/6 mice (19), were freshly obtained from the ATCC (ATCC CCL-34, ATCC CRL-10389, and ATCC CRL-2541, respectively). All cell lines were cultivated as monolayers in the recommended medium supplemented with antibiotic-antimycotic (Cellgro, catalog no. 30-004-Cl; Corning) in uncoated filter cap flasks and subcultured according to methods recommended by the ATCC.

Host cell colonization.

MDCK, DH82, and C8-D1A cells at 50% confluence on polystyrene vessel, tissue culture-treated, uncoated glass chamber slides (catalog no. 354104; BD Falcon) were inoculated with live or killed (by incubation with 10 μg/ml tetracycline overnight at 37°C) strains of M. canis in 1 ml of cell culture medium; incubated under the conditions described above; and then fixed with 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min on ice, permeabilized with 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 for 10 min at 25°C, and blocked with 4% (vol/vol) FBS overnight at 4°C. A sham-inoculated negative control of serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) was routinely included. The slides were probed with primary mouse monoclonal IgG1 anti-α-tubulin (catalog no. T9026; Sigma-Aldrich) at a 1:500 dilution or mouse monoclonal IgG1 clone GA5 anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (catalog no. 14-9892-80; eBioscience) at a 1:500 dilution and our unbiotinylated rabbit polyclonal IgG anti-M. canis lysate at a 1:500 dilution, coincubated for 1 h at 25°C or overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibodies were Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (catalog no. A11001; Invitrogen) at a 1:2,000 dilution and Alexa 546-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (catalog no. A11010; Invitrogen) at a 1:1,000 dilution, coincubated for 1 h at 25°C or overnight at 4°C. The antibodies were diluted in an antibody diluent solution (catalog no. 00-3118; Invitrogen). Controls were probed with secondary antibody only. Coverslips were attached by using 60 μl/slide of mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (catalog no. P36931; Invitrogen). Two-dimensional digital images were recorded by using an EVOS FL fluorescence microscope. Z-series image stacks were recorded at 0.2- to 0.3-μm intervals by using a Leica TCS-SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope and subjected to image deconvolution analyses in three-dimensional digital reconstructions of individual infected cells by using the Volocity Acquisition software module (Perkin-Elmer).

Preliminary time course studies were conducted to establish the rate of cell colonization in vitro by M. canis. Adherent MDCK cells in chamber slides were inoculated with strain PG14T at an initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) of ∼10 mycoplasma CFU to 1 MDCK cell and then washed and fixed for immunofluorescence imaging after 0, 2, 6, 16, 24, and 48 h of incubation.

Stable tagging of M. canis strains PG14T, UF31, UF33, UFG1, and UFG4 and M. cynos strain H-831T with the monomeric red fluorescent protein mCherry was also attempted by random transposon insertion using the mini-Tn4001-tetM plasmid vector pTF20mChloxp (see the supplemental material).

Cell invasion.

The capacity of M. canis strains to invade canine cells was also assessed by using a gentamicin protection assay (20). After a cell viability count was conducted by using trypan blue staining, MDCK and DH82 cells were washed and resuspended in serum-free DMEM; seeded into duplicate 6-well tissue culture-treated polystyrene plates (Costar, catalog no. 3516; Corning); and then inoculated with washed M. canis strain PG14T, UFG1, UF31, UF33, or LV cells at an initial mycoplasma CFU/viable host cell MOI of 10:1. After 24 or 48 h of coincubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, the medium was exchanged with serum-free DMEM plus 400 μg/ml gentamicin. Controls received fresh medium without antibiotic. Incubation was continued for 3 h at 37°C in order to eradicate all extracellular mycoplasmas. The host cells were finally washed and resuspended in serum-free DMEM without antibiotic, and serial dilutions were then inoculated onto SP-4 agar to allow colonies to form from any M. canis cells that had evaded the effects of gentamicin by intracellular invasion. The numbers of colonies were counted after 5 to 7 days of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2. Each colony was interpreted to represent one invaded host cell in order to estimate the frequency of invasion.

Sialidase.

Most strains of M. canis secrete a form of sialidase (neuraminidase) encoded by the nanI gene that might modulate cytadherence, transmission, and possibly host cell injury (12). MDCK cells display terminal sialic acid with both α-(2,3) and α-(2,6) linkages to subterminal galactose in cell surface antennary oligosaccharides (21, 22), but the surface glycosylation patterns of DH82 histiocytes and C8-D1A type I astrocytes are not well documented. The specificity of the M. canis sialidase NanI for α-(2,3)- and/or α-(2,6)-linked sialic acid was determined by using the lectins Maackia amurensis agglutinin (MAA), which binds to terminal sialic acid with an α-(2,3) linkage to galactose, and Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNA), which binds to terminal sialic acid with an α-(2,6) linkage to galactose, to assess desialylation of the glycoprotein substrates fetuin (23) and transferrin (24), respectively. Triantennary fetuin includes both α-(2,3) and α-(2,6) sialic acid linkages, while biantennary transferrin has only the α-(2,6) linkage to galactose. Briefly, 5 μg of fetuin and transferrin was incubated separately with 2.5 × 108 CFU of washed M. canis PG14T cells in 25 μl of glucose-free RPMI medium for 48 h at 37°C. Desialylation was detected in a Western blot format by using digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled lectin probes and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin polyclonal sheep Fab fragments according to the methods provided by the lectin supplier (DIG glycan differentiation kit, catalog no. 11210238001; Roche).

Atypical M. canis strain LV lacks any detectable sialidase activity (12). For the present studies, the genetic basis of its sialidase-negative phenotype was determined by whole-genome sequencing. Complete de novo assembly of Illumina GAIIx paired-end sequencing reads from the strain LV genome was performed by using a combination of Celera, Ray, and Edena softwares (2527). Annotation was accomplished via the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (28). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence similarities to the genomes of previously sequenced strains PG14T, UF31, UF33, UFG1, and UFG4 (29) were calculated by using JSpecies version 1.2.1 (30) and AAI Calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/aai).

The influence of host cell surface sialylation on colonization by M. canis was assessed by using three complementary approaches. First, MDCK cell layers in chamber slides were desialylated by preincubation for 1 h at 37°C in DMEM containing 1 U/ml of exogenous sialidase purified from Clostridium perfringens (catalog no. N-3001; Sigma-Aldrich) (31). The enzyme removes α-(2,3)-, α-(2,6)-, and α-(2,8)-linked cell surface sialic acid, with the α-(2,3)-linked residues being cleaved most efficiently (32). The cells were then washed; inoculated with strain PG14T, UF33, or LV; and imaged in z-series stacks as described above after 24 h of incubation to minimize the potential for resialylation. Uninfected controls were preincubated with 0, 2, 5, or 10 U/ml C. perfringens sialidase. Second, the endogenous sialidase secreted by M. canis strain PG14T was inhibited by preincubation of 1 × 106 CFU for 1 h at 37°C in DMEM containing 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, or 5 mg/ml of 2-deoxy-2,3-didehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid (DANA) (catalog no. 252926; Calbiochem), a competitive inhibitor of bacterial, viral, and mammalian sialidases. The suspensions of M. canis in DMEM containing DANA were then transferred onto MDCK cell layers in chamber slides and imaged in 0.2-μm z-series stacks after 48 h of incubation. Uninfected controls were incubated in DMEM containing 0 or 3.3 mg/ml DANA. Colonization rates in these two studies were quantitated objectively by measuring the total number of anti-M. canis antibody-labeled voxels per cell in reconstructed three-dimensional immunofluorescence images (n = 3 random fields of view/strain, with 30 to 200 cell nuclei/field) by using a “shrink-wrapping” lasso tool to circumscribe precisely the total cellular volume defined by the cytoskeletal label (Volocity Quantitation software module; Perkin-Elmer). As a third approach, untreated MDCK, DH82, and C8-D1A cells were inoculated with sialidase-negative M. canis strain LV in chamber slides and imaged after incubation as described above for the cell invasion studies.

Reactive oxygen species production.

The potential for M. canis strains PG14T, UF31, UF33, UFG1, and UFG4 and M. cynos strain H-831T to produce H2O2 and possibly other reactive oxygen species (ROS) was documented by using an assay based on the conversion of 10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine to fluorescent resorufin in the presence of horseradish peroxidase in a 96-well-plate format. Briefly, 5 × 104 CFU of each strain were pelleted by centrifugation and either resuspended immediately in a proprietary assay buffer in duplicates according to methods provided by the supplier (catalog no. STA-344-T; Cell Biolabs) or resuspended in PBS and starved for 60 min at 37°C before harvest and resuspension in assay buffer supplemented with 100 μM glycerol (33). The final reaction mixture volume was 100 μl. After an initial 30-min incubation at 25°C, the relative fluorescence at 590 nm was measured at 10-min intervals for another 60 min. The amount of ROS present was estimated by comparing the amount of resorufin accumulated in each specimen to that generated by a series of standards containing 0 to 100 μM H2O2.

Cytokine expression.

DH82 cells on chamber slides were inoculated with M. canis when they had reached ~50% confluence. In trial 1, cells were inoculated in duplicates with live cells of M. canis strain PG14T, LV, UFG1, UF31, or UF33 that had been washed and resuspended in serum-free DMEM without stabilized antibiotic-antimycotic at an initial mycoplasma CFU/DH82 cell MOI of 10:1. Negative controls were sham inoculated with serum-free DMEM, and positive controls were stimulated with 10 μg/ml standard lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extracted from Escherichia coli O111:B4 with a phenol-water mixture. Culture supernatant liquid was harvested at 48 h postinoculation and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen until assayed. In trial 2, DH82 cells were inoculated in duplicates with live or killed cells of strain PG14T or UFG1 that had been washed and resuspended in serum-free DMEM with stabilized antibiotic-antimycotic, at initial MOI of ~10:1 or 1,000:1 for each strain. Aliquots of culture supernatant liquid were harvested at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postinoculation and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen until assayed. Levels of gamma interferon (IFN-γ), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were measured by using a custom Milliplex canine cytokine/chemokine panel in a 96-well-plate format according to methods provided by the supplier (catalog no. CCYTOMAG-90K; EMD Millipore) and xMAP fluorometry systems (Luminex LX200 in trial 1 and Bio-Plex MagPix in trial 2).

MHC-II antigen expression.

DH82 cells at 50% confluence in 25-cm2 flasks were inoculated with live cells of M. canis strain PG14T, LV, UFG1, UFG2, UFG3, or UFG4 under the conditions described above for cytokine trial 1, including a sham-inoculated negative control of serum-free DMEM and a positive control treated with 10 μg/ml LPS. After 48 h, the cells were harvested by using a cell scraper and then washed twice with flow wash buffer (FWB) consisting of 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) plus 1 mM EDTA in PBS. Fc-binding receptors specific for IgG2a (34) were blocked in FWB plus 10% (vol/vol) FBS or rat serum (catalog no. R-9759; Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at 4°C, and duplicates of ∼1 × 106 cells were then resuspended in 90 μl of FWB plus 10 μl (0.5 μg) of Alexa 647-conjugated rat IgG2a monoclonal anti-canine major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) antibody (clone YKIX334.2) (catalog no. 51-5909; eBioscience) (35) and incubated in the dark for 1 h at 25°C. Isotype controls were incubated with the same concentration of an Alexa 647-conjugated mouse (catalog no. 51-4724; eBioscience) or rat (catalog no. 557690; BD Pharmingen) IgG2aΚ monoclonal antibody against keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). After three washes in FWB, the cells were resuspended in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4°C and then washed, resuspended in 250 μl of FWB, and strained through prewetted 35-μm nylon mesh into round-bottom polystyrene tubes (catalog no. REF352235; Falcon) for flow cytometry (36). The fluorescence intensity of 5 × 104 to 1 × 105 events (cells) was measured for each specimen.

Endothelin-1 and complement factor H expression.

DH82 cells at 50% confluence in 25-cm2 flasks were inoculated with live cells of M. canis strain PG14T, UF31, UF33, LV, or UFG1 under the conditions described above for MHC-II expression, including a sham-inoculated negative control of serum-free DMEM and a positive control of 10 μg/ml standard LPS. The culture supernatant was harvested at 48 h postinoculation and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen until assayed. The levels of the vasoconstrictive and neuroendocrine regulatory peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) (37, 38) and canine complement factor H were quantitated by using colorimetric sandwich ELISAs according to methods recommended by the suppliers (R&D Systems [catalog no. DET100] and NovaTeinBio [catalog no. BG-CAN10534], respectively).

Statistical analyses.

The effects of the above-described treatments on colonization rates and expression levels of cytokines, ET-1, and complement factor H were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using JMP Pro v11.0 (SAS Institute) and by post hoc Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) or Dunnett comparisons to controls when main effects were significant (P < 0.05). The relative levels of MHC-II expression by infected DH82 cells were compared to those of uninoculated controls by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and probability binning statistical algorithms (FlowJo v9.6; BD Biosciences). A χ(T) value of >4 was considered significant (39).

Immunohistology.

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded brain tissue sections from three archived cases of NME and three archived cases of GME were processed for immunohistochemical staining by using the biotinylated polyclonal anti-M. canis strain PG14T probe described above. Controls were fixed brain tissue sections from archived canine cases of idiopathic cardiac necrosis, chronic hepatopathy, and hemangiosarcoma. The slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated by standard methods, including an intermediary step to quench endogenous peroxidase activity (3% H2O2 in methanol). For enzyme-induced antigen retrieval, sections were submerged in a proprietary trypsin solution (catalog no. 00-3006; Invitrogen). For heat-induced antigen retrieval, sections were heated in a steamer while being submerged in a neutral-pH EDTA solution (catalog no. 920P; Cell Marque). Slides were then coincubated with a universal blocking reagent (catalog no. BS966; Biocare Medical) and a polyclonal anti-M. canis probe at a 1:2,000, 1:4,000, or 1:8,000 dilution for 16 h at 40°C, followed by application of a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (catalog no. RHRP520; Biocare Medical). Bound probe was detected by incubating slides in 3′,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (catalog no. DB801; Biocare Medical). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, and coverslips were mounted by using an antioxidant medium (catalog no. 8312-4; Thermo Scientific). The entire surface of each slide was inspected for accumulation of oxidized DAB precipitates.

RESULTS

Genomics and transformation.

The closed circular M. canis strain LV genome assembly (GenBank accession no. CP011368.1) was 968,791 bp in length and had 27% G+C content, with 97 to 98% average nucleotide identity and 98.1 to 99.5% predicted amino acid identity to five other strains of M. canis. The tetranucleotide frequency correlation with the other strains was 0.9955 to 0.9957. This is the first complete genome of M. canis. A 1.9-kb insertion evident in the sialidase homolog nanI was confirmed by PCR-based Sanger sequencing. It consisted of an insertion sequence (IS) encoding a 509-amino-acid (aa) isoform of a streptococcal IS1202 group transposase (blastp E value of 2e−16) flanked by perfect 90-nucleotide (nt) direct repeats, one of which also occurs in the wild-type nanI open reading frame (ORF) of PG14T and other strains of M. canis. This insertion introduced multiple premature stop codons into the nanI ORF of strain LV, which was sufficient to explain its sialidase-negative phenotype. The transposase had regions of very high similarity (blastp E values of 1e−48 to 4e−91) to two series of short predicted ORFs, MYCN0660 to MYCN0662 and MYCN0767 MYCN0769, annotated in the genome of the canine pathogen M. cynos strain C142 (GenBank accession no. HF559394.1). M. cynos strain H-831T was also PCR positive for the transposase, whereas 10 other isolates of M. canis and M. arginini strain G230T, M. bovigenitalium strain PG11T, M. edwardii strain PG24T, M. maculosum strain Skotti B, M. molare strain H542T, M. opalescens strain MH5408T, and M. spumans strain PG13T were PCR negative, providing evidence that the sialidase-negative phenotype of M. canis strain LV results from insertional inactivation by an IS acquired naturally from M. cynos, possibly during coinfection of a canine host. No other relevant differences from the genomes of other strains of M. canis were recognized.

All strains of M. canis, and M. cynos H-831T, resisted stable genetic transformation with IS256-based random transposition vectors under a multitude of polyethylene glycol (PEG), Lipofectin, Lipofectamine, and electroporation conditions (see the supplemental material). However, the presence of an IS1202 group transposase isoform in the genome of strain LV suggests that M. canis may be amenable to transformation with IS1202-based constructs in the future.

Colonization and invasion.

Under standard SEM conditions, cells of strain PG14T were coccoid, with a diameter of ∼350 nm, which is ∼1/25 of the diameter of a typical MDCK cell nucleus. They had a lightly textured surface marked by 20-nm circular elevations occurring in a pattern of stripes along the axis of the cells (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). No quantitative differences in binding to M. canis whole-cell lysate antigens of different strains, or qualitative differences in the labeling pattern of cells of different M. canis strains adherent to host cells in vitro, were observed among the polyclonal antibody reagents generated for these studies, so the anti-PG14T antibody was adopted as the standard probe. In preliminary time course studies, little surface colonization of MDCK or DH82 cells was apparent microscopically before 24 h postinoculation, and the background of noncytadherent M. canis cells increased substantially beyond 48 h postinoculation, so 48 h was adopted as the standard incubation period for most subsequent experiments. For all strains examined, M. canis was most often observed attached at the margins of host cells in monolayers or in close proximity to host cell nuclei (Fig. 1A to D). Intracytoplasmic M. canis cells (Fig. 1B) were also evident in three-dimensional image reconstructions of infected host cells of all types. Complementary evidence of host cell invasion was the recovery of viable cells of strains PG14T, UF31, and UF33 as early as 24 h postinoculation from both MDCK and DH82 cells subsequently treated with gentamicin (Table 1). Cells of strains PG14T, UF31, and UF33 were recovered from the interior of about 1 of every 10 host cells inoculated, while cells of strains LV and UFG1 were not recovered from either MDCK or DH82 cells following gentamicin treatment. The remains of killed M. canis cells also bound extensively to host cells (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Cell colonization and invasion by M. canis PG14T. (A and B) Crosshairs indicate perinuclear (A) and intracytoplasmic (B) immunolabeled M. canis cells (red) in MDCK epithelial cells optically sectioned in the z-axis at 0.2-μm intervals. The cytoskeleton was labeled with anti-α-tubulin (green), and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). (C and D) Similar patterns of colonization were observed with DH82 histiocytes labeled with anti-α-tubulin (C) and with C8-D1A astrocytes labeled with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (D).

TABLE 1.

Intracellular invasion and persistence of Mycoplasma canis in cultured canine cellsa

Strain Mean CFU in canine cells
− gentamicin
+ gentamicin
24 h
48 h
24 h
48 h
MDCK DH82 MDCK DH82 MDCK DH82 MDCK DH82
PG14T 1.1 × 103 7.0 × 102 1.5 × 103 8.8 × 102 0 0 6.3 × 102 8.5 × 102
UFG1 1.5 × 104 1.5 × 104 1.6 × 104 1.5 × 104 0 0 0 0
LV 8.8 × 102 8.5 × 102 9.4 × 103 3.3 × 103 0 0 0 0
UF31 9.9 × 103 1.6 × 104 1.1 × 104 2.0 × 104 4.1 × 103 8.6 × 102 4.3 × 103 4.9 × 103
UF33 2.1 × 104 2.0 × 104 2.2 × 104 2.4 × 104 3.6 × 103 1.1 × 103 3.8 × 103 3.3 × 103
Pooled SEM 3.9 × 103 4.1 × 103 3.4 × 103 4.6 × 103 3.0 × 102 1.0 × 102 1.1 × 103 1.2 × 103
a

Values are mean CFU (n = 2) recovered from 1 × 105 viable nonphagocytic MDCK epithelial or phagocytic DH82 histiocyte cells in serum-free medium inoculated with washed M. canis cells at an MOI of 10. One CFU represents one infected host cell. Times shown are hours of coincubation of M. canis with canine cells before exposure to 400 μg/ml gentamicin for 3 h at 37°C to eradicate extracellular mycoplasmas.

Role of sialidase in colonization.

Sialidase-negative strain LV colonized untreated MDCK cells as efficiently as wild-type strain PG14T did, and quantitative strain differences (P < 0.05) in the extents of colonization either with or without prior desialylation were at most 2-fold (Fig. 2A). However, pretreatment with exogenous C. perfringens sialidase to desialylate the surfaces of MDCK cells significantly reduced (P < 0.01) their colonization by all strains tested 24 h after inoculation (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, coincubation of strain PG14T with DANA, a competitive inhibitor of its endogenous sialidase, significantly enhanced (P < 0.05) the number of M. canis cells remaining attached to untreated MDCK cells 48 h after inoculation in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 2B). The size, shape, and number of adherent uninfected control cells were unaffected by the above-described treatments with C. perfringens sialidase or DANA.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Role of sialidase in M. canis colonization. (A) Pretreatment of MDCK cells with exogenous sialidase reduces the extent of colonization by all strains tested. Endogenous sialidase-negative strain LV colonized as efficiently as wild-type strain PG14T did. (B) Coincubation with DANA, a competitive inhibitor of sialidase, enhances the number of M. canis cells remaining attached to MDCK cells 48 h after inoculation in a concentration-dependent fashion. Means (± standard errors of the means) with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05 by Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc comparisons). (C) Binding of MAA lectin to fetuin is completely abolished by incubation of the ligand with M. canis, showing that the secreted sialidase of M. canis efficiently removes terminal sialic acid linked with α-(2,3) to galactose. Comparatively less transferrin was modified by incubation with M. canis, as evidenced by the persistence of SNA lectin binding to a predominant 65-kDa band on Western blots and by the appearance of a new 45-kDa band indicating the removal of only one of transferrin's two α-(2,6)-linked terminal sialic acid residues. The blots were spliced for labeling purposes.

The secreted sialidase of M. canis was shown to have a preference for terminal sialic acid with an α-(2,3) linkage to subterminal galactose when binding of MAA lectin to fetuin was completely abolished by incubation of the ligand with M. canis cells (Fig. 2C). Less transferrin was modified by incubation with M. canis, as evidenced by the persistence of SNA binding to a predominant 65-kDa band on Western blots and by the appearance of a new 45-kDa band indicating the removal of only one of transferrin's two terminal sialic acid residues with an α-(2,6) linkage to subterminal galactose. M. canis NanI therefore had the same linkage specificity and relative cleavage efficiency as those of the sialidase purified from C. perfringens.

Reactive oxygen species.

The rate of ROS excretion was strain variable, with the majority of nonstarved cells of the M. canis strains generating a minor increase in excretion in the assay medium, equivalent to <2 μM H2O2/105 CFU/h, although a few strains, including brain isolate G1, generated 3- to 5-fold more ROS (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). Endogenous glycerol-3-phosphate was the presumed substrate for glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase-dependent H2O2 production under these conditions, because following starvation before the assay, no strain of M. canis excreted detectable ROS into glycerol-supplemented assay medium (data not shown).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Strain-variable excretion of ROS by freshly harvested M. canis cells in glycerol-free assay medium. The rate of excretion of H2O2 and possibly other ROS was measured by using an assay based on the oxidation of 10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine to fluorescent resorufin. Means (± standard errors of the means) with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05 by Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc comparisons). Following starvation for 1 h before the assay, no strain excreted detectable ROS in glycerol-supplemented assay medium (data not shown). M. cyn, Mycoplasma cynos strain H-831T.

Cellular responses to colonization.

When measured at 48 h postinoculation, strains of M. canis varied significantly (P < 0.01) in the extent to which they influenced the in vitro secretion of TNF-α by DH82 histiocytes, while the effect of strains did not reach statistical significance for the secretion of IFN-γ, IL-6, or IL-10 (Fig. 4A to D). Vaginal isolates UF31 and UF33 evoked a Th1-type proinflammatory TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ profile, whereas PG14T, LV, and especially brain isolate UFG1, in contrast, seemed anti-inflammatory, with high IL-10/IFN-γ ratios and the smallest amount of TNF-α elicited. The concentration of IFN-γ in the cell culture medium did not increase (P > 0.05) beyond 48 h of incubation with strain PG14T or UFG1, but TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 concentrations continued to increase steadily (P < 0.01) through 96 h. A similar time course of responses for TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 was observed when the MOI was increased to 1,000:1, although the concentrations of all cytokines measured were unexpectedly lower (P < 0.01) at the higher MOI. Exposure of DH82 cells to killed cells of strain PG14T or UFG1 had a tendency to induce slightly more (P < 0.10) IL-10 at each time point than inoculation with live M. canis cells did, and killed cells elicited the secretion of as much of the other cytokines as live M. canis cells did.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Cytokine responses of DH82 histiocytes to colonization with M. canis. Data shown are from 48 h after inoculation with live M. canis cells. M, untreated controls; LPS, controls incubated with 10 μg/ml E. coli LPS. Means (± standard errors of the means) with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05 by Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc comparisons).

Histiocyte MHC-II antigen expression was uniformly suppressed (P < 0.01) by all strains, with 40 to 60% decreases in the median fluorescence intensity induced by strains PG14T and LV (Fig. 5) and 15 to 45% decreases induced by the other strains tested. The median fluorescence intensity of uninoculated controls incubated in 10 μg/ml LPS increased 12% (P < 0.01). No effects of the type of blocking serum (bovine versus rat) or amount of primary antibody (0.05 to 1.25 μg/106 DH82 cells) were detected, but uninoculated histiocytes exposed to the mouse isotype control monoclonal antibody had consistently greater nonspecific fluorescence than did those exposed to the rat isotype equivalent.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Effects of M. canis on MHC-II antigen expression by DH82 histiocytes. Decreases in the median fluorescence intensity of 40 to 60% were induced by strains PG14T and LV, while 15 to 45% decreases were induced by the other strains tested [P < 0.01 by χ(T) test].

Secretion of ET-1 by DH82 cells was inversely related to TNF-α and IFN-γ production, with the greatest decrease in ET-1 (P < 0.05) being elicited by strain UFG1 and only slight decreases being elicited by UF31 and UF33 (Fig. 6). The secretion of complement factor H (3.43 ± 0.05 ng/ml of medium after 48 h for 8 untreated controls) was not significantly affected by inoculation of DH82 cells with any strain of M. canis or by incubation in 10 μg/ml LPS (range, 0.5 to 4.0 ng/ml of medium).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Strain-variable effect of M. canis on secretion of endothelin-1 by DH82 histiocytes. M, untreated controls; LPS, controls incubated with 10 μg/ml E. coli LPS. Means (± standard errors of the means) with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05 by Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc comparisons).

No in vitro cytopathic effects of colonization (rounding, blebbing, vacuolization, or pycnosis) were observed under any conditions for MDCK, DH82, or C8-D1A cells inoculated with any strain of M. canis (Fig. 1).

Immunohistology.

Preliminary studies of NME lesion positive-control serial sections showed that neither trypsin nor heated EDTA antigen retrieval treatment affected the DAB staining patterns. The final method adopted employed no antigen retrieval and a probe dilution of 1:8,000 (1 μg/ml of biotinylated polyclonal anti-M. canis strain PG14T probe). Oxidized DAB precipitates were never seen in negative-control brain specimens (Fig. 7A), but a focal diffuse precipitate was occasionally evident in case specimens (Fig. 7B and C).

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Immunohistochemical staining of archived NME and GME brain tissue samples probed with polyclonal anti-M. canis strain PG14T antibody. Bound probe was detected with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and the DAB substrate. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (violet). (A) Negative-control canine brain parenchyma (magnification, ×10); (B) focal deposition of oxidized DAB precipitate (brown) throughout a vascular cuff in NME tissue (magnification, ×10); (C) detail from panel B (magnification, ×40).

DISCUSSION

The adult human mortality rate of 20 to 30% due to bacterial meningoencephalitis has not been significantly reduced by modern intensive care, diagnostics, or therapy (40). Sequelae among survivors include paresis, epileptic seizures, cerebral palsy, deafness, and cognitive deficits. Gaps in understanding bacterial ME reflect the prevailing research and clinical emphasis on the classic meningitis pathogens Haemophilus, Streptococcus, and Neisseria (41, 42). Fatality rates, however, are highest among the cases ultimately attributed to atypical agents, including species of Mycoplasma and other slow-growing fastidious organisms that resist standard empirical treatment with cell wall-targeting antibiotics (10, 4346). Bacterial neuropathogens vary in their mechanisms of virulence, but assumptions regarding the importance of phagocytosis/exocytosis, fimbriae, capsules, peptidoglycan, and LPS for epithelial penetration and development of bacteremia associated with ME (4750) are all invalid regarding the pathogenesis of mycoplasmal diseases (51, 52). This is important because the diagnostic uncertainty and empirical treatment failures that precede the adverse outcomes of many atypical infections cannot be expected to improve without more comprehensive knowledge of the etiologic agents involved (6, 44, 53, 54).

Several strains of M. canis readily colonized the surfaces of cells integral to epithelial and innate immune barriers to dissemination, as well as one type of brain cell (Fig. 1). M. canis adheres to sialylated receptors on host cells (55). The extent of initial colonization was reduced by pretreatment to remove α-(2,3)- and α-(2,6)-linked sialic acid from host cell surfaces, but the sialidase secreted by M. canis itself did not limit cytadherence to untreated cells, as shown by the similarity in adherences of wild-type strain PG14T and sialidase-negative strain LV (Fig. 2A). The enhanced amount of cells of PG14T remaining attached to untreated MDCK cells after incubation in the presence of the sialidase inhibitor DANA (Fig. 2B) is evidence that its sialidase may instead be important primarily for detachment from colonized host cells and subsequent transmission. The enzyme's preference for α-(2,3)-linked substrates (Fig. 2C) supports the conclusion that the enzyme adheres predominantly to α-(2,6)-linked sialoreceptors. The proportional expression of this glycosylation pattern at different anatomical sites, as well as strain differences in the amounts of sialidase secreted (12), could influence host species range, primary colonization of respiratory or urogenital tract mucosal surfaces, and dissemination and secondary localization of M. canis cells in an infected host.

The presence of visible M. canis inside nonphagocytic cells and its recovery following eradication of extracellular bacteria from both nonphagocytic and phagocytic cells demonstrated its innate capacity for intracellular invasion and persistence (Fig. 1A and B and Table 1). This finding established the potential for direct penetration through adjacent tissues, versus strictly “Trojan horse” spread via infected macrophages (56, 57), as a basis for the dissemination of M. canis from mucosal surfaces. However, the absence of cytopathic effects on any type of host cell colonized in vitro was evidence against direct injury by M. canis and was in favor of multifactorial host responses to colonization as the potential basis for any role in ME or other diseases.

In canine NME, pathological findings consist of neuroparenchymal infiltration of lymphocytes and monocytes or histiocytes, with malacia and necrosis usually being localized in the cerebral cortex and subcortical region (5861). Similar pathologies have been attributed to other species of mycoplasmas that gained entry into the brain (6264). The profile of cytokine secretion by DH82 cells following exposure to M. canis isolates UF31 and UF33, characterized by high TNF-α/IL-10 ratios, clearly contrasted with the responses to strains PG14T, LV, and UFG1, characterized by high IL-10/IFN-γ ratios (Fig. 4A to D). This showed that M. canis is capable of eliciting either pro- or anti-inflammatory host responses in a strain-dependent fashion, which might influence the network of immune barriers to dissemination and recruitment and modulation of inflammatory cells at secondary sites (65). Interestingly, exposure to killed M. canis cells elicited cytokine secretion as effectively as exposure to live M. canis cells did, suggesting that diacylated membrane lipopeptides are the activating factors (6671). The principal pathogenic effect of exposure to individual mycoplasmal lipoproteins characterized to date is transient inflammation (72), marked by local infiltration of granulocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes; the production of proinflammatory cytokines; and complement activation (7375).

The consistently reduced expression of MHC-II observed (Fig. 5) is evidence that the presentation of M. canis or other antigens to CD4+ lymphocytes could be locally compromised during mycoplasmal dissemination or by M. canis at secondary sites of infection. This effect on cellular immunity would further contribute to general immune dysregulation by strains, such as brain isolate UFG1, that elicit comparatively low IFN-γ or TNF-α responses. This pattern is consistent with DH82 cell MHC-II receptor downregulation caused by infection with the obligate intracellular canine pathogen Ehrlichia canis (36) and with the paucity of MHC-II-expressing macrophages in necrotic joint lesions of calves infected with Mycoplasma bovis by intra-articular challenge (76) but contrasts with the marked upregulation of MHC-II-expressing airway epithelial cells following intranasal inoculation of rats with Mycoplasma pulmonis (77).

ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor and also regulates central autonomic control of circulation, respiration, sympathetic vasomotor discharges, and the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (78). M. canis significantly reduced DH82 cell expression of ET-1 (Fig. 6), in contrast to the increases typically resulting from exposure to other bacteria (37, 7981). Once more, the effect was greatest for brain isolate UFG1. This finding showed yet again how M. canis might influence ME in ways that differ from those of classic neuropathogens (82). For example, increased ET-1 levels during acute pneumococcal sepsis promote meningitis through vasoconstriction, resulting in cerebral ischemia (81, 83). Brain endothelial cells, microglia, astrocytes, and neurons are other sources of ET-1 (78, 84). We observed endogenous secretion levels comparable to those found in DH82 cells by Divino et al. (37), but we did not observe the reported stimulation with LPS. Methodological differences from that study included DH82 passage levels (85), the preparation of LPS (E. coli O111:B4 versus O127:B8), and endpoint after stimulation (48 h versus 24 h or less).

Canine GME is distinguished from NME by perivascular cuffing with lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils as well as granulomatous lesions mainly in the cerebellum and brainstem, but both NME and GME are believed to share a pathogenesis (61). Although it did not occur frequently or consistently among cases of GME or NME, deposition of oxidized DAB throughout some vascular cuffs probed with anti-M. canis antibody (Fig. 7B and C) was evidence that the presence of M. canis in canine brains cannot be attributed solely to contamination during nonaseptic tissue collection (2). Because brain tissue specimens are typically not available for examination until long after clinical signs of chronic progressive neurological disease have developed, the abundance of intact M. canis cells remaining to be visualized at necropsy may be very low. A different polyclonal anti-M. canis antibody did not detect intact M. canis cells in similar cases examined (2).

In conclusion, no acute cytopathic effects of in vitro colonization of any host cell type or consistent patterns of M. canis polyvalent antigen distribution in canine ME case brain tissues were evident in the present studies. A causal role of M. canis in canine ME thus remains to be demonstrated. This work was limited by the paucity of commercially available canine-specific cell lines and analytical reagents and by the range of MOIs, analytes, and endpoints that were practical to sample in the in vitro infection studies. The specimens for immunohistology were not matched with unfixed tissues that could be tested by culture or PCR, and they represented only a tiny fraction of each brain. Any influence of M. canis on ME probably involves interactions within the complex multicellular and neurochemical milieu in vivo (86), which could be explored in an organotypic tissue explant model (8789), but a prospective survey for M. canis in aseptically sampled cases of ME is needed. Positive impacts can be expected to include not only a better understanding of the ordinarily commensal organism M. canis and its role in canine diseases but also further insights into processes of bacterial invasion of the central nervous system (CNS) and subsequent injury, which is necessary to develop more comprehensive diagnostics and therapeutic interventions to reduce the burden of human and veterinary infectious neurological disease.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Strains UF31, UF33, LV, 5, 26, Cal, and Mara were provided by Mary Brown at the University of Florida (UF). DNA sequencing and antibody purification and labeling were performed by the UF Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research. Electron microscopic imaging was performed at the Miami University Center for Advanced Microscopy and Imaging. Brian Porter (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA) provided clinical case and control specimens for immunohistology. We gratefully acknowledge technical assistance at UF from Anthony Barbet (bioinformatics), Ann Fu (immunohistology), Craig Moneypenny (immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry), and Marc Salute (cytokine assays). We thank Scott Schatzberg (Veterinary Emergency & Specialty Center, Santa Fe, NM, USA) for advice and critique throughout this study.

We declare no conflicting interests.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01440-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chalker VJ. 2005. Canine mycoplasmas. Res Vet Sci 79:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barber RM, Porter BF, Li Q, May M, Claiborne MK, Allison AB, Howerth EW, Butler A, Wei S, Levine JM, Levine GJ, Brown DR, Schatzberg SJ. 2012. Broadly reactive polymerase chain reaction for pathogen detection in canine granulomatous meningoencephalomyelitis and necrotizing meningoencephalitis. J Vet Intern Med 26:962–968. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00954.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barber RM, Schatzberg SJ, Corneveaux JJ, Allen AN, Porter BF, Pruzin JJ, Platt SR, Kent M, Huentelman MJ. 2011. Identification of risk of loci for necrotizing meningoencephalitis in pug dogs. J Hered 102(Suppl 1):S40–S46. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esr048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schatzberg SJ, Haley NJ, Barr SC, de Lahunta A, Sharp NJ. 2005. Polymerase chain reaction screening for DNA viruses in paraffin-embedded brains from dogs with necrotizing meningoencephalitis, necrotizing leukoencephalitis, and granulomatous meningoencephalitis. J Vet Intern Med 19:553–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2005.tb02726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kupila L, Rantakokko-Jalava K, Jalava J, Nikkari S, Peltonen R, Meurman O, Marttila RJ, Kotilainen E, Kotilainen P. 2003. Aetiological diagnosis of brain abscesses and spinal infections: application of broad range bacterial polymerase chain reaction analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:728–733. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.6.728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tsai JC, Teng LJ, Hsueh PR. 2004. Direct detection of bacterial pathogens in brain abscesses by polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of partial 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid fragments. Neurosurgery 55:1154–1162. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000140842.37422.EE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu J, Moore JE, Millar BC, Webb H, Shields MD, Goldsmith CE. 2005. Employment of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and sequencing in the detection of aetiological agents of meningitis. New Microbiol 28:135–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Al Masalma M, Armougom F, Scheld WM, Dufour H, Roche PH, Drancourt M, Raoult D. 2009. The expansion of the microbiological spectrum of brain abscesses with use of multiple 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing. Clin Infect Dis 48:1169–1178. doi: 10.1086/597578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Al Masalma M, Lonjon M, Richet H, Dufour H, Roche P-H, Drancourt M, Raoult D, Fournier P-E. 2012. Metagenomic analysis of brain abscesses identifies specific bacterial associations. Clin Infect Dis 54:202–210. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kennedy WA. 2004. Infections of the central nervous system, p 777–783. In Osborn LM, First LR, DeWitt TG, Zenel JA (ed), Pediatrics. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edward DG, Fitzgerald WA. 1951. The isolation of organisms of the pleuropneumonia group from dogs. J Gen Microbiol 5:566–575. doi: 10.1099/00221287-5-3-566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.May M, Brown DR. 2009. Secreted sialidase activity of canine mycoplasmas. Vet Microbiol 137:380–383. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosendal S. 1973. Mycoplasma cynos, a new canine Mycoplasma species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 23:49–54. doi: 10.1099/00207713-23-1-49. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.May M, Brown DR. 2015. Mycoplasma and related organisms, p 579–607. In Goldman E, Green LH (ed), CRC practical handbook of microbiology, 3rd ed Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hatchel JM, Balish RS, Duley ML, Balish MF. 2006. Ultrastructure and gliding motility of Mycoplasma amphoriforme, a possible human respiratory pathogen. Microbiology 152:2181–2189. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28905-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Horowitz SA, Cassell GH. 1978. Detection of antibodies to Mycoplasma pulmonis by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infect Immun 22:161–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gaush CR, Hard WL, Smith TF. 1966. Characterization of an established line of canine kidney cells (MDCK). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 122:931–935. doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wellman ML, Krakowka S, Jacobs RM, Kociba GJ. 1988. A macrophage-monocyte cell line from a dog with malignant histiocytosis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 24:223–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02623551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alliot F, Pessac B. 1984. Astrocytic cell clones derived from established cultures of 8-day postnatal mouse cerebella. Brain Res 306:283–291. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90377-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Winner F, Rosengarten R, Citti C. 2000. In vitro cell invasion of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun 68:4238–4244. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.4238-4244.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ito T, Suzuki Y, Takada A, Kawamoto A, Otsuki K, Masuda H, Yamada M, Suzuki T, Kida H, Kawaoka Y. 1997. Differences in sialic acid-galactose linkages in the chicken egg amnion and allantois influence human influenza virus receptor specificity and variant selection. J Virol 71:3357–3362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ulloa F, Real FX. 2001. Differential distribution of sialic acid in α-(2,3) and α-(2,6) linkages in the apical membrane of cultured epithelial cells and tissues. J Histochem Cytochem 49:501–509. doi: 10.1177/002215540104900410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Green ED, Adelt G, Baenziger JU, Wilson S, Van Halbeek H. 1988. The asparagine-linked oligosaccharides on bovine fetuin. J Biol Chem 263:18253–18268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Finne J, Krusius T. 1979. Structural features of the carbohydrate units of plasma glycoproteins. Eur J Biochem 102:583–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb04275.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Myers EW, Sutton GG, Delcher AL, Dew IM, Fasulo DP, Flanigan MJ, Kravitz SA, Mobarry CM, Reinert KH, Remington KA, Anson EL, Bolanos RA, Chou HH, Jordan CM, Halpern AL, Lonardi S, Beasley EM, Brandon RC, Chen L, Dunn PJ, Lai Z, Liang Y, Nusskern DR, Zhan M, Zhang Q, Zheng X, Rubin GM, Adams MD, Venter JC. 2000. A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila. Science 287:2196–2204. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Boisvert S, Raymond F, Godzaridis E, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2012. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol 13:R122. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-r122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hernandez D, François P, Farinelli L, Osterås M, Schrenzel J. 2008. De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res 18:802–809. doi: 10.1101/gr.072033.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. In Beck J, Benson D, Coleman J, Hoeppner M, Johnson M, Maglott M, Mizrachi I, Morris R, Ostell J, Pruitt K, Rubinstein W, Sayers E, Sirotkin K, Tatusova T (ed), The NCBI handbook, 2nd ed NCBI, Bethesda, MD: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280/. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brown DR, May M, Michaels DL, Barbet AF. 2012. Genome annotation of five Mycoplasma canis strains. J Bacteriol 194:4138–4139. doi: 10.1128/JB.00664-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Geary SJ, Gabridge MG. 1987. Characterization of a human lung fibroblast receptor site for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Isr J Med Sci 23:462–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li J, McClane BA. 2014. The sialidases of Clostridium perfringens type D strain CN3718 differ in their properties and sensitivities to inhibitors. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1701–1709. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03440-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hames C, Halbedel S, Hoppert M, Frey J, Stülke J. 2009. Glycerol metabolism is important for cytotoxicity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 191:747–753. doi: 10.1128/JB.01103-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Caux C, Chabanne L, Rigal D, Monier JC. 1993. Canine monocytes express a receptor specific for murine Fcγ2a and Fcγ3 immunoglobulins. Dev Comp Immunol 17:185–193. doi: 10.1016/0145-305X(93)90028-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rabanal RM, Ferrer L, Else RW. 1995. Immunohistochemical detection of canine leucocyte antigens by specific monoclonal antibodies in canine normal tissues. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 47:13–23. doi: 10.1016/0165-2427(94)05398-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harrus S, Waner T, Friedmann-Morvinski D, Fishman Z, Bark H, Harmelin A. 2003. Down-regulation of MHC class II receptors of DH82 cells, following infection with Ehrlichia canis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 96:239–243. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2003.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Divino JN, Chawla KS, da Silva CM, Bjorge AM, Brittingham A. 2010. Endothelin-1 production by the canine macrophage cell line DH82: enhanced production in response to microbial challenge. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 136:127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Freeman BD, Machado FS, Tanowitz HB, Desruisseaux MS. 2014. Endothelin-1 and its role in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. Life Sci 118:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lugli E, Roederer M, Cossarizza A. 2010. Data analysis in flow cytometry: the future just started. Cytometry A 77:705–713. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thigpen MC, Whitney CG, Messonnier NE, Zell ER, Lynfield R, Hadler JL, Harrison LH, Farley MM, Reingold A, Bennett NM, Craig AS, Schaffner W, Thomas A, Lewis MM, Scallan E, Schuchat A. 2011. Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1998-2007. N Engl J Med 364:2016–2025. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Behan PO, Feldman RG, Segerra JM, Draper IT. 1986. Neurological aspects of mycoplasmal infection. Acta Neurol Scand 74:314–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. 2010. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:467–492. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00070-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hata A, Honda Y, Asada K, Sasaki Y, Kenri T, Hata D. 2008. Mycoplasma hominis meningitis in a neonate: case report and review. J Infect 57:338–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee EHL, Winter HLJ, van Dijl JM, Metzemaekers JDM, Arends JP. 2012. Diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of Mycoplasma hominis meningitis in adults. Int J Med Microbiol 302:289–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schlech WF III, Ward JI, Band JD, Hightower A, Fraser DW, Broome CV. 1985. Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1978 through 1981: the National Bacterial Meningitis Surveillance Study. JAMA 253:1749–1754. doi: 10.1001/jama.1985.03350360075022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wenger JD, Hightower AW, Facklam RR, Gaventa S, Broome CV. 1990. Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1986: report of a multistate surveillance study. J Infect Dis 162:1316–1323. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.6.1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tunkel AR, Scheld WM. 1993. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 6:118–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fowler MI, Weller RO, Heckels JE, Christodoulides M. 2004. Different meningitis-causing bacteria induce distinct inflammatory responses on interaction with cells of the human meninges. Cell Microbiol 6:555–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00382.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Doran KS, Engelson EJ, Khosravi A, Maisey HC, Fedtke I, Equils O, Michelsen KS, Arditi M, Peschel A, Nizet V. 2005. Blood-brain barrier invasion by group B Streptococcus depends upon proper cell-surface anchoring of lipoteichoic acid. J Clin Invest 115:2499–2507. doi: 10.1172/JCI23829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alkuwaity K, Taylor A, Heckels JE, Doran KS, Christodoulides M. 2012. Group B streptococcus interactions with human meningeal cells and astrocytes in vitro. PLoS One 7:e42660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rottem S. 2003. Interaction of mycoplasmas with host cells. Physiol Rev 83:417–432. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tsiodras S, Kelesidis I, Kelesidis T, Stamboulis E, Giamarellou H. 2005. Central nervous system manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Infect 51:343–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Seydoux C, Francioli P. 1992. Bacterial brain abscesses: factors influencing mortality and sequelae. Clin Infect Dis 15:394–401. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.3.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Welinder-Olsson C, Dotevall L, Hogevik H, Jungnelius R, Trollfors B, Wahl M, Larsson P. 2007. Comparison of broad-range bacterial PCR and culture of cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of community-acquired bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:879–886. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01756.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Manchee RJ, Taylor-Robinson D. 1969. Utilization of neuraminic acid receptors by mycoplasmas. J Bacteriol 98:914–919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kim KS. 2008. Mechanisms of microbial traversal of the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:625–634. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pulzova L, Bhide MR, Andrej K. 2009. Pathogen translocation across the blood-brain barrier. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 57:203–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kipar A, Baumgärtner W, Vogl C, Gaedke K, Wellman M. 1998. Immunohistochemical characterization of inflammatory cells in brains of dogs with granulomatous meningoencephalitis. Vet Pathol 35:43–52. doi: 10.1177/030098589803500104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shibuya M, Matsuki N, Fujiwara K, Imajoh-Ohmi S, Fukuda H, Pham NT, Tamahara S, Ono K. 2007. Autoantibodies against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cerebrospinal fluids from pug dogs with necrotizing meningoencephalitis. J Vet Med Sci 69:241–245. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Talarico LR, Schatzberg SJ. 2010. Idiopathic granulomatous and necrotising inflammatory disorders of the canine central nervous system: a review and future perspectives. J Small Anim Pract 51:138–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Park ES, Uchida K, Nakayama H. 2012. Comprehensive immunohistochemical studies on canine necrotizing meningoencephalitis (NME), necrotizing leukoencephalitis (NLE), and granulomatous meningoencephalomyelitis (GME). Vet Pathol 49:682–692. doi: 10.1177/0300985811429311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ilha MRS, Rajeev S, Watson C, Woldemeskel M. 2010. Meningoencephalitis caused by Mycoplasma edwardii in a dog. J Vet Diagn Invest 22:805–808. doi: 10.1177/104063871002200530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Beauchamp DJ, da Costa RC, Premanandan C, Burns CG, Cui J. 2011. Mycoplasma felis-associated meningoencephalomyelitis in a cat. J Feline Med Surg 13:139–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Heyward JT, Sabry MZ, Dowdle WR. 1969. Characterization of Mycoplasma species of feline origin. Am J Vet Res 30:615–622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Spitzbarth I, Baungärtner W, Beineke A. 2012. The role of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of spontaneous canine CNS diseases. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 147:6–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mühlradt PF, Kiess M, Meyer H, Süssmuth R, Jung G. 1997. Isolation, structure elucidation, and synthesis of a macrophage stimulatory lipopeptide from Mycoplasma fermentans acting at picomolar concentration. J Exp Med 185:1951–1958. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.11.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mühlradt PF, Kiess M, Meyer H, Süssmuth R, Jung G. 1998. Structure and specific activity of macrophage-stimulating lipopeptides from Mycoplasma hyorhinis. Infect Immun 66:4804–4810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Weigt H, Mühlradt PF, Emmendörffer A, Krug N, Braun A. 2003. Synthetic mycoplasma-derived lipopeptide MALP-2 induces maturation and function of dendritic cells. Immunobiology 207:223–233. doi: 10.1078/0171-2985-00234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Link C, Gavioli R, Ebensen T, Canella A, Reinhard E, Guzmán CA. 2004. The Toll-like receptor ligand MALP-2 stimulates dendritic cell maturation and modulates proteasome composition and activity. Eur J Immunol 34:899–907. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Borsutzky S, Kretschmer K, Becker PD, Mühlradt PF, Kirschning CJ, Weiss S, Guzmán CA. 2005. The mucosal adjuvant macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2 directly stimulates B lymphocytes via the TLR2 without the need of accessory cells. J Immunol 174:6308–6313. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wilde I, Lotz S, Engelmann D, Starke A, van Zandbergen G, Solbach W, Laskay T. 2007. Direct stimulatory effects of the TLR2/6 ligand bacterial lipopeptide MALP-2 on neutrophil granulocytes. Med Microbiol Immunol 196:61–71. doi: 10.1007/s00430-006-0027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lührmann A, Deiters U, Skokowa J, Hanke M, Gessner JE, Mühlradt PF, Pabst R, Tschernig T. 2002. In vivo effects of a synthetic 2-kilodalton macrophage-activating lipopeptide of Mycoplasma fermentans after pulmonary application. Infect Immun 70:3785–3792. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3785-3792.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shimizu T, Kida Y, Kuwano K. 2008. A triacylated lipoprotein from Mycoplasma genitalium activates NF-kappaB through Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and TLR2. Infect Immun 76:3672–3678. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00257-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Deiters U, Mühlradt PF. 1999. Mycoplasmal lipopeptide MALP-2 induces the chemoattractant proteins macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha (MIP-1alpha), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, and MIP-2 and promotes leukocyte infiltration in mice. Infect Immun 67:3390–3398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Matsumoto M, Seya T. 1999. M161Ag is a potent cytokine inducer with complement activating function. Int J Mol Med 3:291–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Devi VR, Poumarat F, Le Grand D, Rosengarten R, Hermeyer K, Hewicker-Trautwein M. 2014. Histopathological findings, phenotyping of inflammatory cells, and expression of markers of nitritative injury in joint tissue samples from calves after vaccination and intraarticular challenge with Mycoplasma bovis strain 1067. Acta Vet Scand 56:45. doi: 10.1186/s13028-014-0045-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Umemoto EY, Brokaw JJ, Dupuis M, McDonald DM. 2002. Rapid changes in shape and number of MHC class II expressing cells in rat airways after Mycoplasma pulmonis infection. Cell Immunol 220:107–115. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8749(03)00026-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kuwaki T, Kurihara H, Cao WH, Kurihara Y, Unekawa M, Yazaki Y, Kumada M. 1997. Physiological role of brain endothelin in the central autonomic control: from neuron to knockout mouse. Prog Neurobiol 51:545–579. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ. 1996. Expression and signal transduction pathways of endothelin receptors in neuroendocrine cells. Front Neuroendocrinol 17:327–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wahl JR, Goetsch NJ, Young HJ, Van Maanen RJ, Johnson JD, Pea AS, Brittingham A. 2005. Murine macrophages produce endothelin-1 after microbial stimulation. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 230:652–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pittman QJ. 2006. Endothelin—an emerging role in proinflammatory pathways in brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290:R162–R163. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00650.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Egidy G, Eberl LP, Valdenaire O, Irmler M, Majdi R, Diserens AC, Fontana A, Janzer RC, Pinet F, Juillerat-Jeanneret L. 2000. The endothelin system in human glioblastoma. Lab Invest 80:1681–1689. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pfister LA, Tureen JH, Shaw S, Christen S, Ferriero DM, Täuber MG, Leib SL. 2000. Endothelin inhibition improves cerebral blood flow and is neuroprotective in pneumococcal meningitis. Ann Neurol 47:329–335. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200003)47:3<329::AID-ANA8>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gebke E, Muller AR, Pehl U, Gerstberger R. 2000. Astrocytes in sensory circumventricular organs of the rat brain express functional binding sites for endothelin. Neuroscience 97:371–381. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00051-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Heinrich F, Contioso VB, Stein VM, Carlson R, Tipold A, Ulrich R, Puff C, Baumgärtner W, Spitzbarth I. 2015. Passage-dependent morphological and phenotypical changes of a canine histiocytic sarcoma cell line (DH82 cells). Vet Immunol Immunopathol 163:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Borghetti P, Saleri R, Mocchegiani E, Corradi A, Martelli P. 2009. Infection, immunity and the neuroendocrine response. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 130:141–162. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hemphill A, Vonlaufen N, Naguleswaran A, Keller N, Riesen M, Guetg N, Srinivasan S, Alaeddine F. 2004. Tissue culture and explant approaches to studying and visualizing Neospora caninum and its interactions with the host cell. Microsc Microanal 10:602–620. doi: 10.1017/S1431927604040930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Greer KA, Daly P, Murphy KE, Callanan JJ. 2010. Analysis of gene expression in brain tissue from greyhounds with meningoencephalitis. Am J Vet Res 71:547–554. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.71.5.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Briggs J, Paoloni M, Chen QR, Wen X, Khan J, Khanna C. 2011. A compendium of canine normal tissue gene expression. PLoS One 6:e17107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Brown DR, May M, Barber R, Schatzberg SJ. 2010. Mycoplasma canis and canine meningoencephalitis, abstr 172 Abstr 18th Congress Int Org Mycoplasmol. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Brown DR, Michaels DL, May M, Barbet AF. 2014. Sialidase knockout in Mycoplasma canis by an insertion sequence from Mycoplasma cynos, abstr 155 Abstr 20th Congress Int Org Mycoplasmol. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES