Skip to main content
NCBI home page
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2015 Nov 24;4:1339. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7386.1

Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan

Mohamed Ahmed 1, Osama Shareef 2, Ishag Adam 1,a, Duria Rayis 1
PMCID: PMC4909122  PMID: 27347370

Abstract

Background

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was considered as the mainstay of treatment for male infertility. Nowadays, the scope of ICSI has been widened to include other causes of infertility. There are few published data on ICSI in countries with low incomes.

Aims

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Saad AbuAlla and Banoun Centers, Khartoum, Sudan to investigate outcomes of ICSI and to determine the parameters that might predict pregnancy success rate following ICSI.

Methods

The study included 191 infertile couples who underwent 296 ICSI cycles between 1st April 2013 and 31 March 2014.

Results

One hundred and ninety one couples (comprising 296 cycles of ICSI) were enrolled to the study. The mean (SD) number of retrieved oocytes was 9.7 (7.5).  The mean (SD) number of transferred embryos was 2.9 (1.0). Out of these, 50 (26.2%) and 40 (20.9%) had chemical and clinical pregnancy, respectively. Thirty–six couples (18.8%) and five couples (2.6%) had miscarriage and had ectopic pregnancy, respectively. Under logistic regression, younger age (OR = 0.8, 95% CI= 0.81 ─ 0.96, P = 0.004) and endometrial thickness (OR = 1.3, 95% CI= 1.07─1.60, P = 0.009) were the significant predictors for the success of ICSI in inducing pregnancy.

Conclusion                

The rates of successful fertilisation and pregnancy-to-term rates in this setting depend mainly on the maternal age.

Keywords: age, ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, infertility, Sudan

Introduction

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is recognized as the last treatment option for infertile couples who want biological children, and has been widely accepted as the most important and efficient treatment for infertility ( Khalaf et al., 2008). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the gold-standard technique for the treatment of male factor infertility (Oehninger et al., 2002). However, ICSI or IVF is also recommended to patients with tubal factor infertility ( Staessen et al., 1999), as well as treatment of infertile couples with unexplained infertility and some polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) cases ( Van der Westerlaken et al., 2005; Youn et al., 2011). Unfortunately due to the high cost, IVF/ICSI services are not widely available at both public and private health institutions in developing countries ( ESHRE, 2008). However, in countries with lower incomes, the utility of infertility treatment is not well-established and there are few existing private IVF/ICSI centers, and those that exist are associated with a high cost; beyond the reach of most couples ( Giwa-Osagie, 2004; Otubu et al., 2006). Because ICSI has a high cost to both the treatment-seeking couple and the health care system, it is necessary to assess its efficacy in different settings. Research in the IVF/ICSI field is of importance for both the treating physicians and the healthcare policy makers and will yield data necessary for patients' counseling. Different success rates/outcomes of ICSI have also been observed in different settings. There are few published data on the outcome of ICSI in countries with low income and there is no published data on ICSI in Sudan. The current study was conducted at Khartoum, Sudan to investigate ICSI outcome and to determine the parameters that might predict pregnancy success rate resulting from ICSI. Different causes of infertility, and both male and female infertility were observed in Sudan ( Elussein et al., 2008).

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted during the period of 1st April 2013 through to 31 March 2014 at Saad AbuAlla and Banoun Centers, Khartoum, Sudan to investigate ICSI outcome and to determine the parameters that might predict pregnancy success rate following ICSI.

After signing an informed consent form, a questionnaire was used to gather information about age, parity, menstrual history, duration of infertility, type of infertility (male infertility, failure of ovulation, tubal infertility, unexplained infertility, endometriosis and PCO), cause of infertility, number of previous cycle, endometrial thickness, number of embryos transferred, and the outcome of ISCI (pregnancy rate, rate of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy).

Couples where males had testicular atrophy, and/or females had uterine anatomical abnormalities, were aged > 44 years, had experience uterine fibroids and/or ICSI failure more than three times were excluded from the study.

In female participants, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were measured on day 3 of the cycle; preceding ovarian stimulation which was performed followed the short GnRH agonist protocol ( Ergenoğlu et al., 2012).

After the workup was done (physical examination, blood group, complete hemogram, viral screening for HIV, HBV and HCV) in the previous cycles, pituitary down-regulation started on the second day of the cycle by daily subcutaneous injection of gonadotrophins and continued until ≥ 3 follicles were present that measured ≥ 17 mm when a 10,000 IU dose of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) was given. Oocyte pickup was scheduled 34–35 hours after the hCG injection. The dose of hCG ranged between 150–450 IU, depending upon the patient's age, and in response to ovarian stimulation in previous ICSI procedures. Transvaginal ultrasound was done on the day of stimulation to exclude ovarian cysts, and on cycle day seven and every other day to monitor follicle size. E2 (17 beta-estradiol) level was measured on cycle day two and when follicle maturation was achieved. In poor respondents, stimulation was stopped at 20th day of the cycle.

Ovum pickup was done under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway using propofol lipuro 1% (10 mg/ml) 20 ml IV, plus atropine 0.5 mg IV, plus 4 mg dexamethasone as needed to prevent laryngeal spasm, in addition to the anesthetic gas, Nitrous oxide. Fentanyl IV was given as analgesic. Follicles were flushed using flush media from Origio (SynVitro™ Flush, Denmark) using a double lumen needle from (Origio®) if the number of follicles was ≤ 5; otherwise, a single lumen needle from (Wallace®, Wallace Ltd, Colchester, England) was used, without flushing. Embryo transfer was done without anesthesia or sedation using a soft catheter from (Wallace®). Briefly, under sterile condition, vaginal parts were cleaned with saline and draped and a Cusco speculum inserted to expose cervix. Cervical mucus was aspirated. The embryos were deposited in uterine cavity under ultrasound guidance at a position approximately 1cm shorter than the fundus. The catheter was then checked under a dissecting microscope for retained embryos. If these were found, they were reloaded and transferred again (repeat transfer). The patients were asked to remain in bed for 15–30 min following transfer.

Statistics

The data were entered into computer using SPSS for Windows version 16.0. The mean (SD) of the ICSI variables (age and BMI) were compared between the women who had clinical pregnancy and women who had not using a Student’s t-test. These variables were compared between the different age groups using one–way ANOVA for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-squared (X 2) test for the proportions of the pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancies and miscarriage. Logistic regression was performed where induction of clinical pregnancy was the dependent variable and the ICSI variables (age, type and duration of infertility, endometrial thickness and the number of oocytes retrieved and their stage of maturation) were the independent variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Ethics

The study received ethical clearance from the Research Board at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Results

One-hundred and ninety-one couples were enrolled to the study, comprising 296 total cycles of ICSI. Out of these 191 couples; 82 (42.9%), 48 (25.1%), seven (3.7%) and 54 (28.3%) had male, female, combined and unexplained infertility, respectively. The vast majority (160; 83.8%) of these 191 couples had primary infertility (failure to achieve pregnancy after one year of unprotected intercourse) and the rest (31; 16.2%) had secondary infertility (failure to achieve pregnancy after one year of unprotected intercourse with previous pregnancy(ies) regardless of its outcome). The mean (SD) duration of infertility was 6.6 (4.4) years. Maternal age range was 18–44 years and the mean (SD) was 32.7 (6.2) years.

The mean (SD) number of retrieved oocytes was 9.7 (7.5). The mean (SD) number of transferred embryos was 2.9 (1.0). The number of retrieved, fertilized oocytes and the transferred embryos was significantly higher in women with age < 30 years ( Table 1; Figure 1).

Figure 1. The number of the retrieved, fertilized oocytes, the transferred embryos and maternal age.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Table 1. Comparison of different parameters between different age groups of ICSI at Khartoum, Sudan.

Variable <30 year
(n=55)		 30–34.9 year
(n=60)		 35–40 year
(n=54)		 >40 years
(n=22)		 P
Body mass index, K/m 2 26.9(5.8) 29.0(6.5) 29.5(4.5) 31.3(5.8) 0.016
Follicle stimulating hormone, IU/L 6.3(2.1) 7.3(3.2) 8.1(3.6) 9.5(3.6) <0.001
Luteinizing hormone, IU/L 4.7(2.5) 5.2(24) 4.2(2.6) 4.4(3.6) 0.762
Days of stimulation 11.1(2.1) 10.8(1.8) 11.3(1.6) 11.7(2.9) 0.298
Endometrial thickness, mm 10.5(1.5) 10.5(1.9) 10.1(1.8) 10.0(1.6) 0.462
Eggs retrieved 14.6(8.3) 9.7(6.3) 6.8(6.2) 4.5(2.5) <0.001
Fertilized ovum 8.4(6.3) 5.7(4.5) 3.9(3.4) 3.0(1.5) <0.001
Egg transfer 3.2(0.8) 3.0(0.9) 2.5(1.0) 2.6(1.1) <0.001
Open in a new tab

Out of these 50 (26.2%) and 40 (20.9%) had chemical and clinical pregnancy, respectively. Thirty-six (18.8%) and five (2.6%) had miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy, respectively. The rate of induction of pregnancy was significantly higher in women of < 30 years of age ( Table 2; Figure 2).

Figure 2. Pregnancy rate and maternal age.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Table 2. Age groups and the outcomes of ICSI among women at Khartoum, Sudan.

Variable <30 year
(n=55)		 30–34.9 year
(n=60)		 35–40 year
(n=54)		 >40 years
(n=22)		 P
Miscarriage 9(16.4) 11(18.3) 10(18.5) 6(27.3) 0.739
Ectopic 2(3.6) 3(5.0) 0(0) 0(0) 0.308
Pregnancy 18(32.7) 17(28.3) 4(7.4) 1(4.5) 0.001
Open in a new tab

While the mean (SD) of the age [29.8 (4.7) vs. 33.5 (6.3) years, P = 0.001] was significantly higher, the endometrial thickness [11.1 (2.2) vs. 10.2 (1.7) mm, P = 0.005] was significantly higher in the women with clinical pregnancy (n=40) than in women who had no pregnancy (n=151). Seventeen (42.05%) out of the 40 couples who experienced successful ICSI had male factor infertility, whereas 65 couples (43.0%; P = 0.767) in which ICSI were unsuccessful had male factor infertility ( Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison of various variables between pregnant and non-pregnant women following ICSI at Khartoum, Sudan.

Variable Pregnancy
(n=40)		 No pregnancy
(n=151)		 P
Age, year 29.8(4.7) 33.5(6.3) 0.001
Body mass index, kg/cm 2 28.6(6.6) 28.8(5.7) 0.825
Duration of infertility, years 5.8(3.1) 6.9(4.7) 0.174
Follicle stimulating hormone, IU/l 7.2(3.0) 7.6(3.3) 0.501
Luteinizing hormone, IU/l 5.8(9.1) 4.4(2.7) 0.109
Days of stimulation 11.4(2.4) 11.1(1.9) 0.354
Endometrial thickness, mm 11.5(2.2) 10.2(1.7) 0.005
17 beta-estradiol at triggering, Pg/ml 3326(2710) 2878(2379) 0.305
Eggs collected 11.6(8.0) 9.3(7.3) 0.082
Fertilized ovum 7.2(5.6) 5.3(4.7) 0.028
Egg transfer, 3.2(0.7) 2.8(1.0) 0.016
Days of transfer 3.9(0.8) 3.7(0.8) 0.139
Open in a new tab

In logistic regression, younger age (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.81–0.96, P = 0.004) and endometrial thickness (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.07–1.60, P = 0.009) were the significant predictors for the success of ICSI treatment ( Table 4). Raw dataset available in Dataset 1.

Table 4. Logistic regression of the predictors of pregnancy following ICSI at Khartoum, Sudan.

Variables OR 95% CI P
Age 0.8 0.81–0.96 0.004
Body mass index 1.0 0.97–1.11 0.264
Male infertility 0.6 0.23–1.58 0.306
Follicle stimulating hormone 0.9 0.83–1.13 0.762
Luteinizing hormone 1.0 0.96–1.16 0.205
Estradiol levels 1.0 1.00–1.00 0.864
Endometrial thickness 1.3 1.07–1.60 0.009
Type of the catheter 2.532 0.195–2.888 0.478
Open in a new tab
Raw data for Ahmed et al., 2015 'Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan'

Age= maternal age (years). BMI= Body mass index (maternal, Kg/m 2). FSH= Follicle stimulating hormone, IU/l. LH= Luteinizing hormone, IU/l. Factor= infertility factor: 1= male, 2= tubal, 3= ovarian, 4= combined, 5= unexplained. Protocol= Protocol used (1= long, 2= short, 3= antagonist, 4= agonist –antagonist, 5= short soft). Days= days of stimulation. Endometrium= Endometrial thickness (mm). E2= 17 beta-estradiol at triggering, (Pg/ml). EC= eggs collected. M2= eggs at metaphase 2. Fertilized= no. of fertilized eggs. DOT= day of transfer. ET= eggs transferred. Chempreg= chemical pregnancy (0= no, 1= Yes). Clinpreg= clinical pregnancy (0= no, 1= yes). Catheter= catheter type. Duration of infertility= duration of infertility (years). Primsec= type of infertility (0= primary infertility, 1= secondary infertility). Miscarriages= miscarriage (0= no, 1= yes). Ectopic pregnancies= ectopic pregnancy (0= no, 1= yes). Age group (0= less than thirty years, 1= thirty-thirty five years, 2= thirty five – forty years, 3= More than forty years) ( Ahmed et al., 2015).

Copyright: © 2015 Ahmed M et al.

Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Click here for additional data file. (6.8KB, tgz)

Discussion and conclusions

The main findings of the current study were that the number of eggs retrieved, fertilized ovum, the number of embryos successfully transferred and the rate of successful induction of pregnancy depend on age of the woman and endometrial thickness. The pregnancy rate (20.9%) in this study was lower than the rates recently reported in Nigeria (30%; Orhue et al., 2012); Tunisia (32.4%; Fourati et al., 2009), Vienna, Austria (27.3%; Nouri et al., 2015) and in Singapore ( Tan et al., 2014). It is worth mentioning, however, that all of these studies (with exception of Fourati et al.) report the pregnancy rate following IVF/ICSI and not the rate following ICSI alone, as in our study.

In the current study, ICSI outcomes such as eggs retrieved, fertilized ovums, embryos transferred and the rate of successful induction of pregnancy depend primarily on age of the woman, where the optimal outcomes were observed in women < 30 years of age. This is consistent with Tan et al.’s (2014) findings where optimal IVF outcomes (the number of oocytes retrieved) was highest among women aged < 30 years, with a reduced number of oocytes retrieved per cycle, lower pregnancy and live birth rates seen among women of older age groups. Likewise, Nouri et al. (2015) observed that age was an independent factor for pregnancy rate following IVF/ICSI. The decreasing ovarian reserve ( Speroff, 1994), poor oocyte quality ( Simpson et al., 2000), higher embryo implantation failure ( Navot et al., 1991), ovulatory dysfunction due to poor hormonal environment ( Hull et al., 1996; Sherman et al., 1976) and uterine problems ( Faddy et al., 1992; Scwartz & Mayaux, 1982) were the postulated effects of the aging process that could have a detrimental effect on the efficacy of IVF/ICSI.

In the current study the pregnancy rate was associated with endometrial thickness. This agrees with the several previous studies which have shown a significant correlation between pregnancy rate and endometrial thickness ( Al-Ghamdi et al., 2008; Kasius et al., 2014; Okohue et al., 2009). Endometrial thickness <7 mm was reported to have a significant reduction in the implantation rate and pregnancy rate. It has recently been shown that (systematic review and meta-analysis) probability of clinical pregnancy for an endometrial thickness ≤7 mm was significantly lower compared with cases with endometrial thickness >7 mm which investigated for pregnancy outcomes after IVF ( Kasius et al., 2014).

We conclude that the fertilization and pregnancy rates in this setting depend mainly on maternal age.

Data availability

The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2015 Ahmed M et al.

Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

F1000Research: Dataset 1. Raw data for Ahmed et al., 2015 'Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan', 10.5256/f1000research.7386.d107727

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no funding was involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; referees: 1 approved

Supplementary materials

Questionnaire for collection of ICSI data.

After signing an informed consent form, the questionnaire was used to gather information about age, parity, menstrual history, duration of infertility, type of infertility (male infertility, failure of ovulation, tubal infertility, unexplained infertility, endometriosis and PCO), cause of infertility, number of previous cycle, endometrial thickness, number of embryos transferred, and the outcome of ISCI (pregnancy rate, rate of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy).

Click here for additional data file. (9KB, tgz)

.

References

  1. Ahmed M, Shareef O, Adam I, et al. : Dataset 1 in: Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan. F1000Research. 2015. Data Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Ghamdi A, Coskun S, Al-Hassan S, et al. : The correlation between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:37–41. 10.1186/1477-7827-6-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elussein EA, Magid YM, Omer MM, et al. : Clinical patterns and major causes of infertility among Sudanese couples. Trop Doct. 2008;38(4):243–4. 10.1258/td.2007.070125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ergenoğlu MA, Yeniel AÖ, Akdoğan A, et al. : The effects of GnRH analogs on serum and follicular fluid leptin levels and pregnancy outcomes in short protocols of assisted reproductive technology. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13(2):91–7. 10.5152/jtgga.2012.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, . Pennings G, de Wert G, et al. : ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 14: equity of access to assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(4):772–4. 10.1093/humrep/den037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, et al. : Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(10):1342–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fourati S, Chaker A, Fadhlaoui A, et al. : [A retrospective study of 339 ICSI cycles: assesment of the two first years of activity of the Assisted Reproductive Technology Center of Aziza Othmana Hospital]. Tunis Med. 2009;87(3):173–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giwa-Osagie OF: The need for infertility services in the developing world: the WHO point of view. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;57(1):58–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hull MG, Fleming CF, Hughes AO, et al. : The age-related decline in female fecundity: a quantitative controlled study of implanting capacity and survival of individual embryos after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(4):783–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. : Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):530–541. 10.1093/humupd/dmu011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, et al. : Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study. BJOG. 2008;115(3):385–90. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01584.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA, et al. : Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age-related decline in female fertility. Lancet. 1991;337(8754):1375–7. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93060-M [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nouri K, Tempfer CB, Walch K, et al. : Predictive value of the time interval between embryo loading and transfer for IVF/ICSI success: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:51. 10.1186/s12958-015-0048-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oehninger S, Gosden RG: Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? No, not in light of the scientific data. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2237–2242. 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Okohue JE, Onuh SO, Ebeigbe P, et al. : The effect of endometrial thickness on in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Afr J Reprod Health. 2009;13(1):113–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Osemwenkha AP, et al. : In vitro fertilization at a public hospital in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(1):56–60. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Otubu JAM: Infertility. In: Agboola A editor, Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynecology for Medical Students.Ibadan, Heineman Educational Books,2006;128–38. [Google Scholar]
  18. Scwartz D, Mayaux MJ: Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(7):404–6. 10.1056/NEJM198202183060706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sherman BM, West JH, Korenman SG: The menopausal transition: analysis of LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone concentrations during menstrual cycles of older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42(4):629–36. 10.1210/jcem-42-4-629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Simpson JL, Lobo RA, Kelsey J, et al. : Genetic programming in ovarian development and oogenesis. Menopause: biology and pathobiology.San Diego, Academic Press.2000;77–94. 10.1016/B978-012453790-3/50006-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Speroff L: The effect of aging on fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6(2):115–20. 10.1097/00001703-199404000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Staessen C, Camus M, Clasen K, et al. : Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(10):2474–2479. 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan TY, Lau SK, Loh SF, et al. : Female ageing and reproductive outcome in assisted reproduction cycles. Singapore Med J. 2014;55(6):305–9. 10.11622/smedj.2014081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Van der Westerlaken L, Helmerhorst F, Dieben S, et al. : Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):612–617. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Youn JS, Cha SH, Park CW, et al. : Predictive value of sperm motility characteristics assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis in intrauterine insemination with superovulation in couples with unexplained infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2011;38(1):47–52. 10.5653/cerm.2011.38.1.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2016 Jun 14. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.7960.r14119

Referee response for version 1

Silke J Dyer 1, Paversan Archary 1

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this article. The authors report on female factors impacting outcome and pregnancy success rate following ICSI for treatment of infertility in a low income setting.

We congratulate and thank the authors on publishing findings on the effectiveness of ART in their country, as data pertaining to the availability, utilization, effectiveness and safety of ART in sub-Saharan Africa are overall scant and much needed.

The paper is generally well written. Data are presented clearly, and the tables and illustrations are relevant. The study design is appropriate, and the analysis and interpretation of data are overall sound. The conclusions derived are balanced and justified. Although the main finding, especially in relation to age is not novel, the paper contributes relevant information on the status of ART in Sudan. 

The paper could be further strengthened if (1) information on biochemical pregnancies was excluded and simply considered under “not pregnant”; (2) data on live births and on complications of ART especially multiple pregnancies were included or, if not available, acknowledged as a study limitation; (3) more information on semen quality and prevalence of severe male factor infertility in the study group were presented; (4) a section on study strengths and limitations was included. 

We have the following additional major and minor observations/ suggestions in order of appearance in the manuscript:

Major:

  1. According to current evidence ICSI should be considered first line intervention for severe male factor infertility. The use for other indications is of no proven benefit according to our understanding of current evidence, although we acknowledge that it is used for other indications as indeed in the index study (see ICMART World report 2008-2009-2010 and accompanying Editorial).  The authors may wish to stay away from a discussion on the role and indications of ICSI in the introduction as in our opinion it weakens the paper; a comment under study limitations may suffice. Instead, it would be of interest to briefly expand on the current situation of ART in Sudan in the introduction.

  2. In table 3, number of eggs fertilized and numbers of eggs transferred also differed between the two groups (p<0.05). It is not clear if these variables were included in the regression analysis- and if not, why. Either way it justifies some attention in both the result and discussion section. 

Minor:

  1. The title is somewhat misleading and could be rephrased. Perhaps “Factors predicting pregnancy following ART with ICSI in Sudan” or similar would capture the study better?

  2. The conclusion in the abstract is not strictly based on the results as no information pertaining to fertilisation are presented in the abstract.

  3. Page 3 column 2; line 1 and 2 should be revised. At present the reader gets the impression that gonadotrophins rather than GnRH agonists are used for pituitary down-regulation. In ‘The dose of hCG ranged between 150 – 450IU’ presumably FSH and not hCG is meant. In addition, the entire section on methods could perhaps be shortened, at least if we assume that readers are familiar with the basic principles of ART.  

  4. Presumably “pregnancy” in table 2 and figure 2 refers to “clinical pregnancies’ only. If the authors follow our recommendation to include biochemical pregnancies under “not pregnant” no changes are required; otherwise an asterix in both the table and figure is needed to specify clinical versus biochemical pregnancy.

  5. The choice of age groups is not in keeping with age categories used by regional/international data registries. This limits valuable comparisons.  It would be advantageous to consider these age categories in future work.

We have read this submission. We believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, Adamson GD: International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod.2016;31(7) : 10.1093/humrep/dew082 1588-609 10.1093/humrep/dew082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Evers J: Santa Claus in the fertility clinic: Table I. Human Reproduction.2016;31(7) : 10.1093/humrep/dew092 1381-1382 10.1093/humrep/dew092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2016 May 26. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.7960.r13995

Referee response for version 1

Akmal El-Mazny 1

The title is appropriate for the content of the article, and the abstract represents a suitable summary of the work. The design, methods, and analysis of the results from the study have been explained and are appropriate for the study. The conclusions are sensible, balanced, and justified on the basis of the results, and enough information has been provided in a usable format to be able to replicate the study.

Recommendations:

Methods:

  • Adequately describe inclusion and exclusion criteria.

  • Mention appropriate details of ovarian stimulation and ICSI technique.

Results:

  • The text should complement the tables and figures (do not duplicate).

  • Clarify the effect size for the main outcome.

Discussion:

  • Mention the differences from other studies.

  • Mention the limitations of the study.

  • Suggest clinical implications.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2016 Mar 10. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.7960.r12588

Referee response for version 1

Frank H de Jong 1

In this manuscript, results of an ICSI programme in Khartoum, Sudan are reported. The amount of new information is limited: as indicated in the discussion, a host of published papers already concluded that maternal age is an important factor determining the success of ICSI or IVF procedures.

The manuscript might be improved on the following aspects:

  1. There is hardly information on the male partners. Data on hormone levels and sperm quality might be as important as the data on hormone levels, endometrial thickness and age in the female partners.

  2. There is no information on sperm retrieval, ICSI procedure or embryo culture.

  3. On page 3, right-hand column, line 6 "HCG"should probably read "FSH".

  4. What happens when pregnancy results are normalized for numbers of embryos transferred? Can the difference in numbers of pregnancies in the different age groups be explained on basis of this number?

  5. It might be better to replace "ovum" (line 2 under Discussion and Conclusions) and "ovums" (line 2 in right-hand column on page 6) with "ova".

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Raw data for Ahmed et al., 2015 'Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan'

    Age= maternal age (years). BMI= Body mass index (maternal, Kg/m 2). FSH= Follicle stimulating hormone, IU/l. LH= Luteinizing hormone, IU/l. Factor= infertility factor: 1= male, 2= tubal, 3= ovarian, 4= combined, 5= unexplained. Protocol= Protocol used (1= long, 2= short, 3= antagonist, 4= agonist –antagonist, 5= short soft). Days= days of stimulation. Endometrium= Endometrial thickness (mm). E2= 17 beta-estradiol at triggering, (Pg/ml). EC= eggs collected. M2= eggs at metaphase 2. Fertilized= no. of fertilized eggs. DOT= day of transfer. ET= eggs transferred. Chempreg= chemical pregnancy (0= no, 1= Yes). Clinpreg= clinical pregnancy (0= no, 1= yes). Catheter= catheter type. Duration of infertility= duration of infertility (years). Primsec= type of infertility (0= primary infertility, 1= secondary infertility). Miscarriages= miscarriage (0= no, 1= yes). Ectopic pregnancies= ectopic pregnancy (0= no, 1= yes). Age group (0= less than thirty years, 1= thirty-thirty five years, 2= thirty five – forty years, 3= More than forty years) ( Ahmed et al., 2015).

    Copyright: © 2015 Ahmed M et al.

    Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

    Click here for additional data file. (6.8KB, tgz)
    Click here for additional data file. (9KB, tgz)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2015 Ahmed M et al.

    Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    F1000Research: Dataset 1. Raw data for Ahmed et al., 2015 'Maternal age and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in infertile couples at Khartoum, Sudan', 10.5256/f1000research.7386.d107727

    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES