Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2004 Aug;186(16):5392–5399. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.16.5392-5399.2004

Kinetic Analysis of tRNA-Directed Transcription Antitermination of the Bacillus subtilis glyQS Gene In Vitro

Frank J Grundy 1, Tina M Henkin 1,*
PMCID: PMC490933  PMID: 15292140

Abstract

Binding of uncharged tRNA to the nascent transcript promotes readthrough of a leader region transcription termination signal in genes regulated by the T box transcription antitermination mechanism. Each gene in the T box family responds independently to its cognate tRNA, with specificity determined by base pairing of the tRNA to the leader at the anticodon and acceptor ends of the tRNA. tRNA binding stabilizes an antiterminator element in the transcript that sequesters sequences that participate in formation of the terminator helix. tRNAGly-dependent antitermination of the Bacillus subtilis glyQS leader was previously demonstrated in a purified in vitro assay system. This assay system was used to investigate the kinetics of transcription through the glyQS leader and the effect of tRNA and transcription elongation factors NusA and NusG on transcriptional pausing and antitermination. Several pause sites, including a major site in the loop of stem III of the leader, were identified, and the effect of modulation of pausing on antitermination efficiency was analyzed. We found that addition of tRNAGly can promote antitermination as long as the tRNA is added before the majority of the transcription complexes reach the termination site, and variations in pausing affect the requirements for timing of tRNA addition.


The rate of transcription elongation plays a crucial role in many genetic regulatory systems that operate at the level of premature termination of transcription. Pausing of RNA polymerase (RNAP) allows interaction of the transcription elongation complex (TEC) with cis-acting elements within the nascent transcript or with trans-acting factors that modulate the structure of the RNA or the properties of the TEC. The rate of transcription elongation in vivo has been estimated at 40 to 50 nucleotides (nt)/s (17, 23). The decision between termination and antitermination is therefore made within a very short timeframe. This is especially important in systems in which the nascent transcript folds into alternate terminator and antiterminator structures (13). In these cases, termination can be prevented by sequestration of the 5′ portion of the terminator helix by pairing with upstream sequences to form the antiterminator element. It is likely that formation or stabilization of the antiterminator element must occur before synthesis of the 3′ portion of the terminator helix; once the terminator helix is established in the appropriate position within the TEC, the residues participating in this helix are unlikely to be available for formation of the antiterminator element. Pausing of the TEC prior to synthesis of the complete terminator helix may therefore be required to allow an opportunity to monitor the relevant regulatory signal. A role for pausing has been established or postulated in a number of termination control systems, including the Escherichia coli trp operon attenuation system (14), L4-mediated attenuation in the E. coli S10 operon (22), the Bacillus subtilis TRAP (24) and PyrR (25) systems, and the E. coli tryptophanase operon (5).

The T box transcription termination control system, which is utilized in gram-positive bacteria for regulation of many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, amino acid biosynthesis, and transporter genes of a variety of amino acid classes, represents an example of a regulatory mechanism involving mutually exclusive antiterminator and terminator elements in the nascent transcript (6, 7). Genes in the T box family contain a complex array of conserved primary sequence and secondary structural elements within the leader RNA, preceding an intrinsic terminator element (Fig. 1) (6, 20). Readthrough of the terminator in each transcriptional unit is induced in response to decreased charging of the cognate tRNA so that, for example, the gene encoding tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is induced when charging of tRNATyr is reduced (10). In the absence of interaction with the cognate uncharged tRNA, transcription terminates very efficiently at the leader region terminator. Specific tRNA recognition requires pairing of the anticodon of the tRNA with a triplet sequence, designated the “specifier sequence,” positioned in a bulge within the stem I portion of the leader (Fig. 1) (6). A second interaction between the acceptor end of the tRNA and a bulge in the antiterminator element is also required and provides discrimination between uncharged and charged tRNA (10). These two positions of interaction are necessary, but not always sufficient, for efficient tRNA-dependent antitermination (8).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Structural model of the B. subtilis glyQS leader RNA. The structure is shown in the terminator conformation. The antiterminator conformation results from pairing of sequences on the 5′ side of the terminator with upstream sequences. Stem I and stem III represent major conserved structural elements in all T box family leaders; glyQS leader sequences are exceptional in that they lack the stem II and stem IIA/B pseudoknot elements found in most other leaders. Major pause sites are labeled with arrows; bold arrows indicate the most stable sites, G138 and G220 (T, the termination site). The sequence alterations in the stem III loop (Eco1 mutation, U136G, U137A, and G138A) are indicated with hollow arrows and lowercase letters. Numbers are relative to the glyQS transcription initiation site. Residues in the specifier loop and in the antiterminator bulge that pair with the anticodon and acceptor ends of the tRNA, respectively, are boxed. The glyQS construct shown contains a substitution of C at position +2 to allow transcription initiation with ApC.

Recent progress in the demonstration of tRNA-dependent antitermination in vitro has provided new tools for analysis of this system. tRNAGly-mediated antitermination of the B. subtilis glyQS leader occurs in a minimal system containing only purified B. subtilis RNAP, nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), tRNAGly (generated with a T7 RNAP in vitro transcription system), and DNA template (11). In contrast, tRNAThr-dependent antitermination of the B. subtilis thrS gene requires either cellular extracts or high levels of spermidine and employs tRNA purified from the cell (18). In both systems, antitermination is dependent on the cognate tRNA; tRNAs that do not match the leader at the specifier or antiterminator regions fail to promote readthrough.

The use of halted complex transcription conditions for glyQS antitermination permits more detailed analyses of the kinetics of transcription. Since antitermination is dependent on a complex RNA-RNA interaction, which in vivo also requires selection of the appropriate tRNA from the cellular pool, pausing of the TEC during transcription could play an important role in the antitermination mechanism. In the present study, we identify multiple pause positions within the glyQS leader during transcription in vitro and investigate the effect of manipulation of pausing by variations in nucleotide sequence and NTP concentration on the efficiency of antitermination and the requirements for the timing of tRNA addition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials.

The DNA template was a 440-bp PCR fragment including the B. subtilis glyQS promoter, leader, and terminator regions, with 85 bp past the termination site. His-tagged B. subtilis RNAP was isolated as described by Qi and Hulett (19). E. coli RNAP, prepared as described elsewhere (12), was provided by I. Artsimovitch. B. subtilis NusA protein was purified as described previously (9) and used when indicated at 25 nM. E. coli NusG protein was provided by I. Artsimovitch and was used at 100 nM.

B. subtilis tRNAGly was synthesized by T7 RNAP transcription using a PCR fragment generated with a 5′ oligonucleotide primer including a T7 RNAP promoter sequence. The first base of the transcript was positioned at the 5′ position of the tRNA, and the final position of the PCR product corresponded to the 3′ position of the tRNA. T7 RNAP transcription was carried out by using an Ambion T7 MEGAshortscript transcription kit. The tRNA transcripts were gel purified as described previously (11).

In vitro transcription assays.

Transcription reactions were carried out as described previously (11), using B. subtilis RNAP at 6 nM, DNA template at 10 nM, and 1× transcription buffer (9). E. coli RNAP was used at 10 nM. Transcription was initiated with the dinucleotide ApC (150 μM; Sigma), in the absence of CTP. ATP and GTP were used at 2 μM in the initiation reaction mixture, UTP was added to 0.75 μM, and [α-32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol) was added to 0.25 μM. Initiation reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 15 min and then were placed on ice. Heparin (20 μg/ml; Sigma) was added to block reinitiation, and elongation was restarted by addition of all four NTPs to the desired concentration. tRNAGly (200 nM) was added at the time of restart, where indicated. Transcription reactions were terminated by extraction with phenol, and the products were resolved by denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by PhosphorImager analysis.

Size standards were generated by DNA sequencing of the glyQS template with Sequenase 2.0 DNA polymerase, using an oligonucleotide primer with its 5′ end positioned at the transcription start site. RNA standards were generated as described by Landick et al. (15) by in vitro transcription of the glyQS region in the presence of 20 to 40 μM chain-terminating nucleotides 3′-O-methyl-GTP (Amersham Biosciences) or 3′-dATP (cardycepin 5′-triphosphate; Sigma), to generate G and A ladders, respectively.

Time course assays.

The progression of RNAP through the glyQS leader region was examined during transcription elongation in the presence of various NTP concentrations by removing samples at intervals after restart of the transcription reaction and terminating transcription by phenol extraction. For tRNA addition time course experiments, tRNA was omitted from the restart reaction. At each time point, one sample was mixed with phenol to stop the reaction, and a second sample was added to tRNA and incubated at 37°C for an additional 15 min.

RESULTS

tRNAGly-dependent glyQS antitermination in vitro requires low NTP concentrations.

Single-round transcription of a glyQS template by B. subtilis RNAP was initiated in the presence of 2 μM GTP, ATP, and UTP and halted at position +17 by omission of CTP. Reinitiation was blocked by addition of heparin, and synchronous restart of the halted complexes was triggered by addition of CTP, in the presence or absence of tRNAGly (11). NTP concentrations during the restart reaction were varied from 5 to 400 μM. Efficient tRNAGly-dependent antitermination occurred at 5 or 10 μM NTPs, with a 10-fold stimulation in readthrough in response to addition of the tRNA (Fig. 2). As the NTP concentration increased, both an increase in the level of readthrough in the absence of tRNA and a decrease in the tRNA response were observed, so that at the highest concentration all of the observed readthrough was tRNA independent. These results indicate that both termination and tRNA-dependent antitermination are sensitive to NTP concentration.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Effect of NTP concentration and tRNAGly on glyQS transcription in vitro. Transcription was carried out at 5, 10, 30, 100, or 400 μM NTPs in the elongation reaction mixture, in the presence (filled bars) or absence (open bars) of tRNAGly. Percent readthrough was calculated as the fraction of product in the readthrough band compared to the total product in the terminated and readthrough bands.

The decrease in termination at high NTP concentrations could be due to direct interference with terminator function because of alterations in transcription kinetics, as previously described (16). Alternatively, transcription in the presence of high concentrations of NTPs could cause nonspecific stabilization of the competing antiterminator conformation. This was tested using a glyQS template containing only the promoter and terminator regions (ΔG19-G168) (Fig. 1); termination in this construct was also inefficient at high NTP concentrations (data not shown), indicating that this effect is a feature of the terminator itself and is independent of the presence of the competing antiterminator structure in the nascent transcript. Since the glyQS leader region terminator is efficient in vivo (11), reduction of NTP concentration appears to be important for similar efficiency in vitro.

Low NTP concentration also appears to be important for tRNA-dependent antitermination, which was reduced to 4-fold at 30 μM NTPs and to 1.5-fold at 100 μM NTPs (Fig. 2). Loss of tRNA-dependent antitermination at high NTP concentrations could be due to an increased transcription rate, which could affect folding of the nascent transcript into the proper conformation for interaction with the tRNA. Rapid transcription through the leader could also result in a reduced opportunity for the tRNA to interact, since progression of the TEC to the termination site occurs rapidly. Alternatively, a high NTP concentration could affect pausing of RNAP at one or more required discrete pause sites.

Pausing of RNAP during glyQS transcription in vitro.

Time course assays were used to examine the processivity of transcription of the glyQS leader during transcription with B. subtilis RNAP (Fig. 3A). Samples were removed at 20-s intervals after restart of the halted complexes, and the resulting products were resolved on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel and compared to an RNA sequencing ladder. At 20 and 40 s, the majority of the products observed ended at several positions near the specifier loop and the 3′ side of the base of stem I (Fig. 1). At 60 s, the majority of the product was at position G138, in the loop of stem III. The pause at this position was prolonged (t1/2 = 2.9 min) (Table 1), with product gradually appearing at positions corresponding to the 3′ region of the antiterminator (position U177) and the terminator (G220, the first position following the U run). Position G138 represents a pause rather than an arrest site, since no product remained at this position after prolonged incubation (data not shown).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Pausing during glyQS transcription in vitro. Transcription was halted by omission of CTP, and elongation was carried out in the presence of 10 μM NTPs and in the presence or absence of tRNAGly, as indicated. Samples were removed at the indicated time points after restart, and the reactions were terminated by phenol extraction. The positions of the major pause sites and the terminated (T) and readthrough (RT) products were identified using an RNA sequencing ladder and are labeled. Lanes 1 and 10, 0 s; lanes 2 and 11, 20 s; lanes 3 and 12, 40 s; lanes 4 and 13, 60 s; lanes 5 and 14, 80 s; lanes 6 and 15, 100 s; lanes 7 and 16, 120 s; lanes 8 and 15, 5 min; lanes 9 and 16, 10 min. (A) B. subtilis RNAP, wild-type template; (B) E. coli RNAP, wild-type template; (C) B. subtilis RNAP, Eco1 mutant template.

TABLE 1.

Effect of NTP concentration on the duration of the G138 pause and tRNA-dependent readthrough

NTP concn(s)a (μM) G138 pauseb (t1/2 [min]) Readthroughc (%)
10 2.9 50 ± 3
3 5.8 60 ± 5
2 20 45 ± 3
10 (CTP, ATP, and UTP), 150 (GTP) 1.5 50 ± 5
10 (UTP), 150 (GTP, ATP, and CTP) 0.60 44 ± 1
a

NTP concentration during elongation step, after release from the halted complex.

b

The half-life of the pause at G138 was calculated from time course experiments, similar to those shown in Fig. 3.

c

Efficiency of readthrough in the presence of tRNAGly was measured after 15 min of elongation (for 10 μM or higher concentrations of NTPs) or after 25 min of elongation (for 2 or 3 μM NTPs). Readthrough in the absence of tRNAGly was approximately 5% under all conditions shown.

The pausing profile and rate of appearance of the terminated product were unaffected by the addition of tRNAGly, although tRNAGly addition resulted in the appearance of two readthrough bands, one corresponding to position U240, 20 nt downstream of the terminator, and the second, more prominent band representing the runoff product (Fig. 3A). It therefore appears that the tRNA-nascent RNA interaction does not affect the processivity of transcription until the TEC reaches the terminator-antiterminator decision point.

Effect of NusA and NusG on pausing in vitro.

NusA and NusG are transcription elongation factors that affect the processivity of RNAP. NusA has been reported to promote pausing at hairpin pause sites by both B. subtilis (24, 25) and E. coli (2) RNAP, while NusG promotes release of E. coli RNAP from backtrack pause sites (2). Addition of B. subtilis NusA protein during the glyQS transcription elongation reaction increased termination efficiency but had no effect on tRNA-dependent readthrough, as previously reported (11, 21). NusA also had no effect on the pausing pattern or pause half-life (data not shown), consistent with the absence of hairpin structures in appropriate positions relative to the observed major pause sites. In contrast, addition of E. coli NusG resulted in a two- to fourfold reduction of pause half-life at all sites (data not shown). The efficiency of tRNAGly-dependent antitermination was not affected by addition of NusG, indicating that if the pause sites in the nascent transcript are important for readthrough, the residual pausing in the presence of NusG is sufficient.

Kinetics of glyQS transcription by E. coli RNAP.

tRNAGly-dependent antitermination in vitro occurred with similar efficiency using either B. subtilis or E. coli RNAP (11). Transcription reactions with E. coli RNAP exhibited a pausing pattern similar to those with B. subtilis RNAP, although pausing was more pronounced, additional pause sites were detectable, and the overall rate of transcription through the leader was reduced (Fig. 3B). The pause at position G138 found for B. subtilis RNAP was also apparent in the E. coli RNAP reactions but was accompanied by a more prominent band at position U140. An additional major pause at A170, in the terminal loop of the antiterminator, was also detected. As was observed with B. subtilis RNAP, addition of tRNAGly had no effect on the pausing pattern but resulted in efficient readthrough of the leader region terminator. It therefore appears that while there are differences in the pausing profiles for the two forms of RNAP, both exhibit significant pauses in approximately the same positions of the leader.

Mutation of the pause site in stem III.

The significance of the pause at G138 was further investigated by alteration of three positions in this region (Eco1 mutant, U136G, U137A, and G138A) by site-directed mutagenesis. The Eco1 mutant exhibited greatly reduced pausing within the loop of stem III, with increased representation of products at positions 136, 137, and 139 in addition to 138 (Fig. 3C). In addition, transcription through the leader region was faster, with accumulation of the terminated and readthrough products at earlier time points compared to those with the wild-type construct. The efficiency of tRNA-directed antitermination was unaffected, indicating that the precise sequence at the pause site is not required for antitermination. The Eco1 mutant also exhibited normal expression in vivo (data not shown).

Effect of varying NTP concentration on pausing and readthrough.

Since tRNA-dependent antitermination was sensitive to NTP concentration, we examined the effect of limiting NTPs on both pausing and readthrough. Decreasing the NTP concentration during the elongation reaction from 10 to 3 μM resulted in a twofold increase in the duration of the pause at stem III and conferred a small increase in readthrough efficiency (Table 1). A further reduction of NTP concentration to 2 μM resulted in a sevenfold increase in the half-life of the pause but did not increase readthrough. When the GTP concentration was raised to 150 μM (with ATP, CTP, and UTP at 10 μM), the half-life of the pause in the stem III loop region decreased twofold, with no decrease in antitermination. Under these conditions, the position of the pause product at stem III shifted from G138 to U136, U137, and U139, suggesting that the pause at G138 is dependent on low GTP and that neither the prolonged pause nor the precise position of the pause at G138 is essential for antitermination. Raising the CTP or ATP concentration to 150 μM had no effect on either pausing or readthrough, while an increase in UTP concentration resulted in high tRNA-independent readthrough (data not shown). Limitation of UTP, in the presence of high GTP, ATP, and CTP, resulted in a fivefold decrease in the duration of the stem III pause, but tRNA-directed antitermination was still efficient. Limitation of any one of the other NTPs (in the presence of high concentrations of the other three) resulted in elevated readthrough in the absence of tRNAGly (data not shown), as was observed when all four NTPs were used at a high concentration (Fig. 2). It therefore appears that low UTP is required for efficient termination and that the duration of the pause at stem III can be reduced without loss of tRNA-directed antitermination in vitro.

Variation in the time of addition of tRNAGly.

The position of the major pause at stem III, after synthesis of the stem I domain that interacts with the anticodon region of the tRNA, suggested the possibility that the pause could be important for the initial interaction of the leader with the tRNA. We therefore added tRNAGly at intervals during the elongation reaction and compared the antitermination efficiencies. Addition of tRNAGly at any point prior to the time when the majority of the elongation complexes had left the pause site in stem III resulted in efficient antitermination; addition of tRNA after that time resulted in a significant reduction in readthrough (Fig. 4). When the duration of the pause at stem III was reduced by increasing the GTP, ATP, and CTP concentrations, the timing for addition of tRNA was also altered, so that tRNA addition only at the earliest time points promoted antitermination. In contrast, increasing the duration of the pause by reduction of NTP concentrations permitted efficient antitermination when tRNA was added later in the transcription reaction. These results indicate that the window for tRNA addition is influenced by the kinetics of transcription elongation and suggest that tRNA must access the leader before the TEC reaches the termination site.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Effect of tRNA addition during the transcription reaction. Transcription was halted by omission of CTP and restarted in the presence of various NTP concentrations. Samples were taken at intervals during the elongation reactions and were either terminated by phenol extraction, to show the position of the TEC at that time point (“pause”; open symbols), or were added to tRNA and allowed to incubate for an additional 15 min before termination, to determine the readthrough efficiency (“readthrough”; filled symbols). G, GTP; A, ATP; U, UTP; C, CTP.

DISCUSSION

Current models for transcription termination at intrinsic terminators invoke an interaction of the terminator helix with RNAP, coupled with destabilization of the DNA-RNA hybrid contributed by the run of U residues at the termination site (1). Termination at the glyQS leader region terminator in vitro was inefficient at high NTP concentrations. This could be due to rapid transcription through the terminator region, so that the terminator helix fails to form in the nascent transcript at the required time. Alternatively, the fact that limitation of UTP was sufficient to allow efficient termination suggests that slow addition of U residues to the 3′ end of the transcript may be a key parameter for termination at this site in vitro. In support of this idea, extension of the run of Us in the B. subtilis tyrS T box family leader caused increased termination in vivo (9). Furthermore, T box leader terminators generally contain an uninterrupted U stretch 5 to 7 nt in length, usually followed by a single purine and then additional U residues, resulting in a U stretch considerably longer than those usually observed in E. coli (4). While few terminators have been characterized in detail in B. subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria, the extended U stretch, coupled with a longer terminator helix, may prove to be a general feature of transcriptional terminators from low-G+C gram-positive organisms.

Time course analysis of glyQS transcription with B. subtilis RNAP revealed several discrete products that appeared at characteristic times during the transcription reaction. These included short-lived products representing several positions in the 3′ portion of stem I, a prominent product representing a prolonged pause at G138 in the loop of stem III, and a product representing position U177 in the 3′ region of the antiterminator opposite the bulge. Each of these products eventually disappeared after extended incubation, and the final products represent the terminated and readthrough transcripts (if tRNA was present), with an additional product 20 nt downstream of the termination site; this product appears to represent an additional pause site that is found only in reactions containing tRNA. Transcription in the absence of tRNA resulted in a small amount of the readthrough product, with a 10-fold increase in the presence of tRNA.

Two major classes of pause signals have been described for bacterial RNAPs. Hairpin-dependent pause sites involve formation of a stem-loop region in the nascent transcript at an appropriate distance from the pause position, while backtrack pauses are sequence dependent and result from slippage of RNAP relative to the template DNA (2). For the short-lived products paused in the 3′ region of stem I, it is likely that the nascent transcript contains extensive structure, which could contribute to pausing in this region. In contrast, no hairpin structure can be found in the region upstream of the major pause in the loop of stem III, and the helical region of the antiterminator upstream of the pause at U177 is too close to the pause site to be likely to act as a hairpin-dependent pause site. NusA had no effect on the pausing pattern, consistent with the idea that the major pause sites do not represent hairpin-dependent pauses. Addition of NusG reduced pausing at all of the observed sites, including the site downstream of the terminator, consistent with the idea that these pause sites are likely to represent backtrack events. B. subtilis RNAP was previously shown to respond to backtrack pause sites but not hairpin-dependent pause sites from E. coli, indicating that there are some differences in the sensitivity of these enzymes to different pausing signals (3). The B. subtilis trp and pyr termination control systems, in contrast, exhibit pause sites that have the characteristics of hairpin-dependent pauses, including a strong stimulation by NusA (24, 25). In the glyQS leader, it appears that most of the pausing signals recognized by B. subtilis RNAP are also recognized by E. coli RNAP, with additional sites recognized by the E. coli enzyme, consistent with the results of Artsimovitch et al. (3).

The observation of an extended pause in the stem III loop region of the glyQS leader during transcription in the presence of low NTP concentrations raised the question of whether this pause plays a functional role in tRNA-dependent antitermination. We found that it was possible to add the tRNA at any time prior to or during the pause, but once the majority of the TEC left the pause site, termination occurred quickly and tRNA addition had little effect. Changing the duration of the pause by variation of the NTP concentration resulted in corresponding changes in the window for tRNA addition. However, the distribution of TECs within the leader and the rapid progression to the termination site after departure from the G138 pause make it difficult to determine if the pause site represents a crucial opportunity for tRNA binding.

Transcription through the major pause sites was unaffected by the presence of tRNA. This suggests that if pausing facilitates the interaction of tRNA with the nascent transcript, then this interaction does not affect the pause itself, i.e., tRNA binding does not stimulate the TEC to continue elongation. Again, this differs from the B. subtilis trp system, where binding of TRAP results in release of the NusA-dependent pause (24). Similarly, the translating ribosome stimulates release from the pause site in the E. coli trp and tna operons (5, 14), whereas addition of PyrR has no effect on pausing in the B. subtilis pyr operon (25).

The position of the major pause site in the loop of stem III is intriguing. The specifier loop, which is located at the 3′ side of the base of stem I, contains the primary determinant for pairing with the anticodon loop of the tRNA. Pausing at stem III would permit this first major structural element to be completely synthesized and to fold into the appropriate structure. The glyQS leader is missing two large structural elements, stem II and the IIA/B pseudoknot, that are found in the majority of T box leaders (20). Stem III is therefore the next available element. A stem-loop is found in this region, just upstream of the antiterminator, in nearly all T box family leaders, although there is little conservation of sequence or structure (F. J. Grundy, S. M. Rollins and T. M. Henkin, unpublished results). A mutation in the glyQS stem III loop had no effect on expression in vivo or antitermination in vitro, supporting the idea that the primary sequence in this region is not important for antitermination activity. Mutations in the stem III loop of the tyrS leader also had no effect on antitermination in vivo, and extension of stem III by insertion of an additional helical element allowed normal expression (F. J. Grundy and T. M. Henkin, unpublished results). It will be interesting to determine the effect of major alterations in stem III on glyQS antitermination in vitro and whether other leaders with different structural arrangements (e.g., the presence of stem II and IIA/B) exhibit a similar pausing pattern.

Variation in the NTP concentration, the use of E. coli RNAP, or altering the sequence in the stem III loop resulted in minor shifts in the position of the major pause site. Since tRNA-dependent antitermination occurred efficiently under all of these conditions, the precise position of the pause within this loop does not appear to be crucial for antitermination, consistent with the sequence variability in this region of T box leaders and its lack of sensitivity to mutation. However, reduction of the stem III pause half-life allowed antitermination only if the tRNA was added early in the reaction, while extension of the pause permitted later addition of the tRNA. These data are consistent with a model in which pausing of RNAP provides an opportunity for interaction of the tRNA with the nascent transcript. No condition was found that completely blocked pausing at stem III, precluding a direct test of whether the pause site is dispensable. The pause at U177 in the 3′ side of the antiterminator could also play a role in tRNA interaction, but the short duration of this pause, and the rapid progression from this position to the termination site, complicates assessment of its possible function. Further analysis will be required to determine if either the stem III or antiterminator region pause sites play a role in the antitermination mechanism.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM47823 from the National Institutes of Health.

We thank F. M. Hulett for providing the strain for production of B. subtilis RNAP, M. Haldeman for preparation of B. subtlis NusA protein, I. Artsimovitch for providing E. coli RNAP, NusG, and advice on time course experiments, and S. Tigert for testing glyQS expression in vivo.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Artsimovitch, I. Control of transcription termination and antitermination. In N. P. Higgins (ed.), The bacterial chromosome, in press. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 2.Artsimovitch, I., and R. Landick. 2000. Pausing by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by mechanistically distinct classes of signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7090-7095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Artsimovitch, I., V. Svetlov, L. Anthony, R. R. Burgess, and R. Landick. 2000. RNA polymerases from Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli differ in recognition of regulatory signals in vitro. J. Bacteriol. 182:6027-6035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.d'Aubenton Carafa, Y., E. Brody, and C. Thermes. 1990. Prediction of Rho-independent Escherichia coli transcription terminators. A statistical analysis of their stem-loop structures. J. Mol. Biol. 216:835-858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gong, F., and C. Yanofsky. 2003. A transcriptional pause synchronizes translation with transcription in the tryptophanase operon leader region. J. Bacteriol. 185:6472-6476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grundy, F. J., and T. M. Henkin. 1993. tRNA as a positive regulator of transcription antitermination in B. subtilis. Cell 74:475-482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grundy, F. J., and T. M. Henkin. 2003. The T box and S box transcription termination control systems. Front. Biosci. 8:d20-d31. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Grundy, F. J., S. E. Hodil, S. M. Rollins, and T. M. Henkin. 1997. Specificity of tRNA-mRNA interactions in Bacillus subtilis tyrS antitermination. J. Bacteriol. 179:2587-2594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grundy, F. J., T. R. Moir, M. T. Haldeman, and T. M. Henkin. 2002. Sequence requirements for terminators and antiterminators in the T box transcription antitermination system: disparity between conservation and functional requirements. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1646-1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grundy, F. J., S. M. Rollins, and T. M. Henkin. 1994. Interaction between the acceptor end of tRNA and the T box stimulates antitermination in the Bacillus subtilis tyrS gene: a new role for the discriminator base. J. Bacteriol. 235:798-804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grundy, F. J., W. C. Winkler, and T. M. Henkin. 2002. tRNA-mediated transcription antitermination in vitro: codon-anticodon pairing independent of the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11121-11126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hager, D. A., D. J. Jin, and R. R. Burgess. 1990. Use of Mono Q high-resolution ion-exchange chromatography to obtain highly pure and active Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Biochemistry 29:7890-7894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Henkin, T. M., and C. Yanofsky. 2002. Regulation by transcription attenuation in bacteria: how RNA provides instructions for transcription termination/antitermination decisions. Bioessays 24:700-707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Landick, R., J. Carey, and C. Yanofsky. 1985. Translation activates the paused transcription complex and restores transcription of the trp operon leader region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:4663-4667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Landick, R., D. Wang, and C. L. Chan. 1996. Quantitative analysis of transcriptional pausing by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: his leader pause site as paradigm. Methods Enzymol. 274:334-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McDowell, J. C., J. W. Roberts, D. J. Jin, and C. Gross. 1994. Determination of intrinsic transcription termination efficiency by RNA polymerase elongation rate. Science 266:822-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mosteller, R. D., and C. Yanofsky. 1970. Transcription of the tryptophan operon in Escherichia coli: rifampicin as an inhibitor of initiation. J. Mol. Biol. 48:525-531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Putzer, H., C. Condon, D. Brechemier-Baey, R. Brito, and M. Grunberg-Manago. 2002. Transfer RNA-mediated antitermination in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3026-3033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qi, Y., and F. M. Hulett. 1998. PhoP∼P and RNA polymerase σA holoenzyme are sufficient for transcription of Pho regulon promoters in Bacillus subtilis: PhoP∼P activator sites within the coding region stimulate transcription in vitro. Mol. Microbiol. 28:1187-1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rollins, S. M., F. J. Grundy, and T. M. Henkin. 1997. Analysis of cis-acting sequence and structural elements required for antitermination of the Bacillus subtilis tyrS gene. Mol. Microbiol. 25:411-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schmidt, M. C., and M. J. Chamberlin. 1987. nusA protein of Escherichia coli is an efficient transcription termination factor for certain termination sites. J. Mol. Biol. 195:809-818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sha, Y., L. Lindahl, and J. M. Zengel. 1995. Role of NusA in L4-mediated attenuation control of the S10 r-protein operon of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 245:474-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vogel, U., and K. F. Jensen. 1994. The RNA chain elongation rate in Escherichia coli depends on the growth rate. J. Bacteriol. 176:2807-2813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yakhnin, A. V., and P. Babitzke. 2002. NusA-stimulated RNA polymerase pausing and termination participates in the Bacillus subtilis trp operon attenuation mechanism in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11067-11072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang, H., and R. L. Switzer. 2003. Transcriptional pausing in the Bacillus subtilis pyr operon in vitro: a role in transcriptional attenuation? J. Bacteriol. 185:4764-4771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES