Summary
Mast cells (MCs) are cells that originate in the bone marrow from pluripotent CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Precursors of MCs migrate through the circulation to their target tissues, completing their maturation process into granulated cells under the influence of several microenvironment growth factors. The most important of these factors is the ligand for the c-Kit receptor (c-Kit-R) namely stem cell factor (SCF), secreted mainly by fibroblasts and endothelial cells (ECs). SCF also regulates development, survival and de novo proliferation of MCs. It has already been demonstrated that gain-of-function mutations of gene c-Kit encoding c-Kit-R result in the development of some tumors. Furthermore, MCs are able also to modulate both innate and adaptive immune response and to express the high-affinity IgE receptor following IgE activation. Among the other IgE-independent MC activation mechanisms, a wide variety of other surface receptors for cytokines, chemokines, immunoglobulins, and complement are also described. Interestingly, MCs can stimulate angiogenesis by releasing of several pro-angiogenic cytokines stored in their cytoplasm. Studies published in the last year suggest that angiogenesis stimulated by MCs may play an important role in tumor growth and progression. Here, we aim to focus several biological features of MCs and to summarize new anti-cancer MC-targeted strategies with potential translation in human clinical trials.
Keywords: Mast cells, New targets, Anti-cancer therapy
Introduction
Mast cells (MCs) are derived from the myeloid stem cell and are part of the innate immune system. Although best known for their role in allergy and anaphylaxis, MCs play an important protective role as well, being intimately involved in wound healing and defense against pathogens. MCs are present in most tissues, characteristically surrounding blood vessels and nerves, and are especially prominent near the boundaries between the outside world and the internal milieu, such as the skin, mucosa of the lungs and digestive tract, as well as in the mouth, the conjunctiva, and the nose [1,2,3,4,5].
MCs express a high-affinity receptor for the Fc region of IgE, the least-abundant member of the antibodies. This receptor is of such high affinity that binding of IgE molecules is in essence irreversible. As a result, MCs are coated with IgE, which is produced by plasma cells. MCs release their preformed mediators when they encounter the complement anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, and organisms that attack humans often produce exogenous factors (e.g. bacteria-derived ADP and mite-derived proteases) that also induce the release of the granule constituents of MCs via different surface receptors. MC degranulation is also stimulated by the activation of its membrane tyrosine kinase receptor, the c-Kit receptor (CD117), by means of the stem cell factor (SCF) [6,7,8].
MC granules are key functional elements that are characterized by two distinct secretory patterns: exocytosis and piecemeal degranulation. Interestingly, this latter mechanism, representing a slow and selective pathway of cell secretion, has been more frequently observed in MC-infiltrating areas of chronic inflammation, such as tumor tissues. Correspondingly, a link between MCs, chronic inflammation and cancer has long been suggested. Thus, MCs are one of the earliest and major inflammatory cell types recruited into the tumor microenvironment [9,10].
MCs have been involved in tumor angiogenesis of several human and animal malignancies. It has been well demonstrated that MCs can secrete several classical and non-classical pro-angiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), platelet-derived growth factor-β (PDGF-β), IL-6, IL-8, thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and chymase. MCs can secrete other molecules such as tryptase and TNF-α that play a role in angiogenesis, and not in immune response [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
In light of this, our paper aims at examining the specific contribution of MCs to cancer, also shedding light on the existing MC-based therapeutic approaches to be evaluated.
Mast Cells in Cancer
MCs are important in allergic and late-phase reactions, inflammation, and the regulation of adaptive T-cell-mediated immunity: MCs mobilize T cells and antigen-presenting dendritic cells. However, the role of MCs in the tumorigenesis of cancers is not totally clear, and data about their benefit or detriment to tumorigenesis have been controversial, depending on the local stromal conditions [27,28,29].
Tumor cells produce inflammatory mediators and pro-angiogenic factors, including SCF. Activation of the SCF/Kit pathway is necessary for the maturation, migration, and survival of MCs since they derive from hematopoietic precursors inside the bone marrow and complete their differentiation and maturation within vascularized tissues. The surrounding environment of tumors, through SCF chemotaxis, promotes infiltration and maturation of MCs, which release angiogenic mediators, proteases, and growth factors that support tumor development.
Studies have allowed substantial progress in understanding the role of MCs in tumorigenesis and progression but further studies are necessary to completely elucidate their impact on the pathophysiology of cancer [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
MCs can directly influence tumor cell proliferation and invasion but also help tumors indirectly by organizing its microenvironment and modulating immune responses to tumor cells. MCs are best known for orchestrating inflammation and angiogenesis, and their role in shaping adaptive immune responses has become a focus of recent investigations [38,39,40,41].
The central role of MCs in the control of innate and adaptive immunity endows them with the ability to tune the nature of host responses to cancer and ultimately influence the outcome of disease and fate of the cancer patient [42].
MCs could stimulate growth, neo-angiogenesis and metastasis of tumors by multiple mechanisms. MCs are involved in innate immunity by releasing TNF-α and interleukins (IL-1, IL-4, IL-6). In addition, MCs express both the major histocompatibility class (MHC) II antigen and its costimulatory molecule, which activate adaptive T- and B-cell responses. Cytokines, secreted by stromal cells, can exacerbate the malignant phenotype of cancer cells. By producing chemoattractant molecules, cytokines recruit inflammatory cells into tumor sites, influencing them in a way that ultimately promotes cancer progression (fig. 1) [42,43,44,45,46].
Fig. 1.

MCs degranulation in primary colon cancer tissue (white arrow). Mast cells positive to tryptase (black big arrow) and the adjacent microvessels with an asterisk in its lumen (black small arrow).
MCs usually express Toll-like-receptors (TLRs), a class of proteins that play a key role in the innate immune system. TLRs are a type of patterns recognition receptor (PRR) and recognize molecules that are broadly shared by pathogens, collectively referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [47]. TLRs together with the IL-1 receptors, form a receptor superfamily known as the ‘IL-1 receptor / toll-like receptor superfamily’. All members of this family have in common a so-called TIR (Toll-IL-1 receptor) domain [48]. TLR signaling is divided into two distinct signaling pathways: i) the MyD88-dependent pathway with the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and ii) the TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing IFN-β(TRIF)-dependent pathway with activation of serine/threonine-protein kinase-1 (TBK1) and receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK-1). They also have different adapters to respond to activation and are located sometimes at the cell surface and sometimes at internal cell compartments. Following their activation by pathogen ligands, several reactions are possible: inflammation, tumor growth, and angiogenesis [49]. However, the ability of TLRs agonists to cause MC degranulation, migration and cytokine/chemokine production is controversial. In fact, some researchers have been unable to demonstrate degranulation after stimulation of MCs with TLR ligands [50].
MCs are then activated either by direct contact or by cancer cell-derived triggers to release selectively various pro-cancer and pro-angiogenetic mediators (table 1) [51,52,53,54].
Table 1.
Mediators stored in the granules of MCs
| IL-16 |
| TNF-a |
| Platelet-derived growth factor |
| IL-6 |
| IL-8 |
| VEGF |
| GM-CSF |
| IFN-γ |
| TGF-β |
| FGF |
| Tryptase |
| M-CSF |
| Heparin |
| Chymase |
| Serotonin |
| Histamine |
One of these pro-angiogenic mediators is tryptase, stored in MC secretory granules. It is an agonist of the proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) in vascular endothelial cells that stimulates their proliferation. Protease-activated receptors (PARs) belong to the G protein-coupled receptor family. Four forms of PARs have been reported (PAR-1 to PAR-4). Proteases cleave the N-terminus to generate a tethered ligand, which interacts and activates the receptor. Signaling via PAR-2 elicits activation of the major members of the MAPK phosphorylation family and contributes to a pro-malignant transcriptional program and stimulates oncogenic protein synthesis. PAR-2 activation also leads to the production of pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, IL-8, IL-6, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) (fig. 2) [55,56,57,58,59].
Fig. 2.

Mediators, released after MCs activation of c-KitR/SCF-mediated, have angiogenic activity stimulating both human vascular endothelial and tumor cell proliferation in paracrine manner, helping tumor cell invasion and metastasis. c-KitR = c-Kit receptor; PAR-2 = proteinase-activated receptor-2; SCF = stem cell factor; FGF = fibroblast growth factor; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; TLRs = Toll-like-receptors; NHERF-1 = Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor- 1; MEKK-1 = mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-related kinase-1; MEKK-4 = mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-related kinase-4; JNK = c-Jun N-terminal kinase; c-Jun = Jun protooncogene; SAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase-9; GEF = rho/rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor; Rho = rhodopsin transcription termination factor; SOS = SOn of sevenless protein; Grb2 = growth factor receptor-bound protein 2; Shc = Shc transforming protein kinase; Ras = Ras protein kinase; Raf = Raf protein kinase; MEKK-1/2 = mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-related kinase-1/2; Erk = Elk-related tyrosine kinase; DAG = diacylglycerol; IP-3 = inositol triphosphate; PK-C = protein kinase-C; COX-2 = cyclooxygenase-2; PGE2 = prostaglandin E2; PGES-1 = prostaglandin E synthase-1; PK-A = protein kinase-A.
Targeting Mast Cells in Cancer Therapy
The precise role of MCs in tumor development and progression will be of critical importance for the development of new targeted therapies in human cancers.
Although MCs offer an attractive target in tumor for new therapies, still limited data are available in literature for the real clinical use in cancer patients care. From a therapeutic point of view, in vitro/in vivo tumor models treated with inhibitors of MC degranulation presented decreased growth, vascularization, and metastases. According to these data, targeting MCs is currently under investigation. Actually, therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib and masitinib) for c-Kit receptor-targeted action and MC tryptase inhibitors (gabexate mesylate, nafamostat mesylate and tranilast) represent the most used clinical treatments against MCs in cancer [8,60,61,62,63,64,65].
Experimental in vivo/in vitro results showed the novel anti-tumor effect of TLR-activated MCs agonists in melanoma as well as in lung and brain tumors [66,67]
An interesting phase I/II trial on 10 patients explored safety and efficacy of the TLR-2/6 agonist MALP-2 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with incompletely resectable pancreas carcinomas. Results showed a mean survival of 17.1 ± 4.2 months and a median survival of 9.3 months [68].
Preliminary in vivo/in vitro results were obtained by other researchers. Their data suggested that therapeutic targeting of MCs degranulation factors could be a novel strategy to inhibit tumor growth and neo-angiogenesis [69].
Finally, some authors focused on the potential use of MCs targeting agents, such as MC tryptase inhibitors (gabexate mesylate, nafamostat mesylate) or c-Kit-R tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib, masitinib) as possible new anti-angiogenic and antiresorptive strategies for the treatment of gastric cancer patients affected by bone metastases [70]. The studies mentioned above are summarized in table 2.
Table 2.
All studies mentioned above that have considered MCs target in cancer therapy
| Reference | Approach | Models | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oldford et al., 2010 [66]; Wei et al., 2012 [67] | drug therapy | in vitro/in vivo | TLR-activated MCs agonists in melanoma, lung and brain tumors |
| Schmidt et al., 2007 [68] | clinical trial phase I/II | in vivo/human | TLR-2/6 agonist MALP-2 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreas carcinomas |
| Ammendola et al., 2014 [13]; Ranieri, 2012 [69], | drug therapy | in vitro/in vivo | MC degranulation factors in solid tumors |
| Leporini et al., 2015 [70] | drug therapy | in vitro/in vivo | MCs positive to tryptase or c-Kit-R in gastric cancer and bone metastases |
Conclusions
The role of MC infiltrates in tumors is still unclear and merits particular attention. Unveiling complex interactions between MCs, microenvironment and tumors could provide insights into the understanding of disease pathogenesis. This may open new avenues in expanding the arsenal of targeted therapies aiming to induce tumor growth arrest and tumor cell response to chemotherapy. From a conceptual point of view, we think that, if MCs may contribute to stimulate tumor progression and angiogenesis, the concomitant inhibition of MCs or one of its degranulation factors may be a novel strategy worthy of further investigation. For these reasons, we speculate that a combination chemotherapy of tryptase inhibitors or c-Kit receptor inhibitors and classical cytotoxic drugs could potentially exert a synergistic anti-tumor effect. In this context, novel agents killing MCs might be evaluated in adjuvant clinical trials as a new anti-cancer approach.
Authors' Contributions
Michele Ammendola, Girolamo Ranieri, and Giuseppe Sammarco contributed to think up the design of manuscript and to perform the critical review of the literature; Maria Luposella, Rosa Patruno, Rosario Sacco, Cosmo Damiano Gadaleta, and Giovambattista De Sarro contributed to literature research, data analysis, and language revision. All authors wrote the manuscript.
Disclosure Statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- 1.Ribatti D, Guidolin D, Marzullo A, et al. Mast cells and angiogenesis in gastric carcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol. 2010;91:350–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00714.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Irani AM, Schwartz LB. Human mast cell heterogeneity. Allergy Proc. 1994;15:303–308. doi: 10.2500/108854194778816472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marech I, Ammendola M, Gadaleta C, et al. Possible biological and translational significance of mast cells density in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:8910–8920. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.8910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marshall JS. Mast-cell responses to pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:787–799. doi: 10.1038/nri1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Horny HP, Sotlar K, Valent P. Mastocytosis: state of the art. Pathobiology. 2007;74:121–132. doi: 10.1159/000101711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Furuta T, Imajo-Ohmi S, Fukuda H, et al. Mast cell-mediated immune responses through IgE antibody and Toll-like receptor 4 by malarial peroxiredoxin. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:1341–1350. doi: 10.1002/eji.200738059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hassan S, Kinoshita Y, Kawanami C, et al. Expression of protooncogene c-kit and its ligand stem cell factor (SCF) in gastric carcinoma cell lines. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:8–14. doi: 10.1023/a:1018851415704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Patruno R, Marech I, Zizzo N, et al. C-Kit expression, angiogenesis, and grading in canine mast cell tumour: a unique model to study c-Kit driven human malignancies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:730246. doi: 10.1155/2014/730246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mangia A, Malfettone A, Rossi R, et al. Tissue remodelling in breast cancer: human mast cell tryptase as an initiator of myofibroblast differentiation. Histopathology. 2011;58:1096–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Crivellato E, Ribatti D. The mast cell: an evolutionary perspective. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010;85:347–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ammendola M, Sacco R, Donato G, et al. Mast cell positivity to tryptase correlates with metastatic lymph nodes in gastrointestinal cancer patients treated surgically. Oncology. 2013;85:111–116. doi: 10.1159/000351145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Marech I, Ammendola M, Sacco R, et al. Serum tryptase, mast cells positive to tryptase and microvascular density evaluation in early breast cancer patients: possible translational significance. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:534. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ammendola M, Sacco R, Sammarco G, et al. Correlation between serum tryptase, mast cells positive to tryptase and microvascular density in colorectal cancer patients: possible biological-clinical significance. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ammendola M, Sacco R, Sammarco G, et al. Mast cells density positive to tryptase correlates with angiogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients having undergone surgery. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:951957. doi: 10.1155/2014/951957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ranieri G, Labriola A, Achille G, et al. Microvessel density, mast cell density and thymidine phosphorylase expression in oral squamous carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2002;21:1317–1323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Malfettone A, Silvestris N, Saponaro C, et al. High density of tryptase-positive mast cells in human colorectal cancer: a poor prognostic factor related to protease-activated receptor 2 expression. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1025–1037. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ranieri G, Passantino L, Patruno R, et al. The dog mast cell tumour as a model to study the relationship between angiogenesis, mast cell density and tumour malignancy. Oncol Rep. 2005;5:1189–1193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ranieri G, Patruno R, Lionetti A, et al. Endothelial area and microvascular density in a canine non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an interspecies model of tumor angiogenesis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005;46:1639–1643. doi: 10.1080/10428190500205150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zizzo N, Patruno R, Zito FA, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations from platelets correlate with tumor angiogenesis and grading in a spontaneous canine non-Hodgkin lymphoma model. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51:291–296. doi: 10.3109/10428190903452818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gulubova M, Vlaykova T. Prognostic significance of mast cell number and microvascular density for the survival of patients with primary colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1265–1275. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Galli SJ, Kalesnikoff J, Grimbaldeston MA, et al. Mast cells as ‘tunable’ effector and immunoregulatory cells: recent advances. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:749–786. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Blair RJ, Meng H, Marchese MJ, et al. Human mast cells stimulate vascular tube formation. Tryptase is a novel, potent angiogenic factor. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2691–2700. doi: 10.1172/JCI119458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nakae S, Suto H, Kakurai M, et al. Mast cells enhance T cell activation: importance of mast cell-derived TNF. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:6467–6472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501912102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ribatti D, Ranieri G, Nico B, et al. Tryptase and chymase are angiogenic in vivo in the chorioallantoic membrane assay. Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55:99–102. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.103138dr. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ammendola M, Zuccala V, Patruno R, et al. Tryptase-positive mast cells and angiogenesis in keloids: a new possible post-surgical target for prevention. Updates Surg. 2013;65:53–57. doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0183-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ammendola M, Sacco R, Marech I, et al. Microvascular density and endothelial area correlate with Ki-67 proliferative index in surgically-treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. Oncol Lett. 2015;10:967–971. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Maciel TT, Moura IC, Hermine O. The role of mast cells in cancers. F1000Prime Rep. 2015:7–09. doi: 10.12703/P7-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fakhrjou A, Niroumand-Oscoei SM, Somi MH, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating mast cells in outcome of patients with esophagus squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014;45:48–53. doi: 10.1007/s12029-013-9550-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ribatti D. Mast cells and macrophages exert beneficial and detrimental effects on tumor progression and angiogenesis. Immunol Lett. 2013;152:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Biswas A, Richards JE, Massaro J, et al. Mast cells in cutaneous tumors: innocent bystander or maestro conductor? Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:806–811. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jiang L, Hua Y, Shen Q, et al. Role of mast cells in gynecological neoplasms. Front Biosci. 2013;18:773–781. doi: 10.2741/4140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Georgin-Lavialle S, Lhermitte L, Dubreuil P, et al. Mast cell leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:1285–1295. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Amagai Y, Tanaka A, Matsuda A, et al. Stem cell factor contributes to tumorigenesis of mast cells via an autocrine/paracrine mechanism. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93:245–250. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0512245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vidal MT, de Oliveira Araújo IB, Gurgel CA, et al. Density of mast cells and microvessels in minor salivary gland tumors. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:309–316. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0552-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tanaka T, Ishikawa H. Mast cells and inflammation-associated colorectal carcinogenesis. Semin Immunopathol. 2013;35:245–254. doi: 10.1007/s00281-012-0343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rabenhorst A, Schlaak M, Heukamp LC, et al. Mast cells play a protumorigenic role in primary cutaneous lymphoma. Blood. 2012;120:2042–2054. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-415638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de Souza DA, Jr, Toso VD, Campos MR, et al. Expression of mast cell proteases correlates with mast cell maturation and angiogenesis during tumor progression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim M, Cho KH, Lee JH, et al. Intratumoral mast cell number is negatively correlated with tumor size and mitosis in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Exp Dermatol. 2012;21:559–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dyduch G, Kaczmarczyk K, Okoń K. Mast cells and cancer: enemies or allies? Pol J Pathol. 2012;63:1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kalra M, Rao N, Nanda K, et al. The role of mast cells on angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e190–196. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chang DZ, Ma Y, Ji B, et al. Mast cells in tumor microenvironment promotes the in vivo growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7015–7023. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Khazaie K, Blatner NR, Khan MW, et al. The significant role of mast cells in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011;30:45–60. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9286-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wasiuk A, de Vries VC, Hartmann K, et al. Mast cells as regulators of adaptive immunity to tumours. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;155:140–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03840.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Theoharides TC, Conti P. Mast cells: The JEKYLL and HYDE of tumor growth. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Melillo RM, Guarino V, Avilla E, et al. Mast cells have a protumorigenic role in human thyroid cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:6203–6215. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Visciano C, Liotti F, Prevete N, et al. Mast cells induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell features in human thyroid cancer cells through an IL-8-Akt-Slug pathway. Oncogene. 2015;34:5175–5186. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Majewska M, Szczepanik M. The role of Toll-like receptors (TLR) in innate and adaptive immune responses and their function in immune response regulation. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2006;60:52–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zorn CN, Keck S, Hendriks RW, et al. Bruton's tyrosine kinase is dispensable for the Toll-like receptor-mediated activation of mast cells. Cell Signal. 2009;21:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Applequist SE, Wallin RP, Ljunggren HG. Variable expression of Toll-like receptor in murine innate and adaptive immune cell lines. Int Immunol. 2002;14:1065–1074. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxf069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sandig H, Bulfone-Paus S. TLR signaling in mast cells: common and unique features. Front Immunol. 2012;3:185. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Norrby K. Mast cells and angiogenesis. APMIS. 2002;110:355–371. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2002.100501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ammendola M, Marech I, Sammarco G, et al. Infiltrating mast cells correlate with angiogenesis in bone metastases from gastric cancer patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:3237–3250. doi: 10.3390/ijms16023237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ranieri G, Ammendola M, Marech I, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and tryptase changes after chemoembolization in hepatocarcinoma patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:6018–6025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.6018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Marech I, Leporini C, Ammendola M, et al. Classical and non-classical proangiogenic factors as a target of antiangiogenic therapy in tumor microenvironment. Cancer Lett. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.028. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Malfettone A, Silvestris N, Saponaro C, et al. High density of tryptase-positive mast cells in human colorectal cancer: a poor prognostic factor related to protease-activated receptor 2 expression. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1025–1037. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Soreide K, Janssen EA, Körner H, et al. Trypsin in colorectal cancer: molecular biological mechanisms of proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. J Pathol. 2006;209(2):147–156. doi: 10.1002/path.1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Darmoul D, Marie JC, Devaud H, et al. Initiation of human colon cancer cell proliferation by trypsin acting at protease-activated receptor-2. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:772–779. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Uusitalo-Jarvinen H, Kurokawa T, Mueller BM, et al. Role of protease activated receptor 1 and 2 signaling in hypoxia-induced angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1456–1462. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.142539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Liu Y, Mueller BM. Protease-activated receptor-2 regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression in MDA-MB-231 cells via MAPK pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;344:1263–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Josephs DH, Fisher DS, Spicer J, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 2013;35:562–587. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318292b931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Marech I, Gadaleta CD, Ranieri G. Possible prognostic and therapeutic significance of c-Kit expression, mast cell count and microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:13060–13076. doi: 10.3390/ijms150713060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Marech I, Patruno R, Zizzo N, et al. Masitinib (AB1010), from canine tumor model to human clinical development: where we are? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;91:98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Georgin-Lavialle S, Lhermitte L, Suarez F, et al. Mast cell leukemia: identification of a new c-Kit mutation, dup(501-502), and response to masitinib, a c-Kit tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Eur J Haematol. 2012;89:47–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Arock M, Sotlar K, Akin C, et al. KIT mutation analysis in mast cell neoplasms: recommendations of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis. Leukemia. 2015;29:1223–1232. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ammendola M, Leporini C, Marech I, et al. Targeting mast cells tryptase in tumor microenvironment: a potential antiangiogenetic strategy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:154702. doi: 10.1155/2014/154702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Oldford SA, Haidl ID, Howatt MA, et al. A critical role for mast cells and mast cell-derived IL-6 in TLR2-mediated inhibition of tumor growth. J Immunol. 2010;185:7067–7076. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wei JJ, Song CW, Sun LC, et al. SCF and TLR4 ligand cooperate to augment the tumor-promoting potential of mast cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61:303–312. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1098-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schmidt J, Welsch T, Jäger D, et al. Intratumoural injection of the toll-like receptor-2/6 agonist ‘macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2’ in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I/II trial. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:598–604. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ranieri, G. Hot topic: targeting tumor angiogenesis: an update. Curr Med Chem. 2012;9:937. doi: 10.2174/092986712799320718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Leporini C, Ammendola M, Marech I, et al. Targeting mast cells in gastric cancer with special reference to bone metastases. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:10493–10501. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
