Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 May 15;89(10):4432–4436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4432

Approximating Markov chains.

S M Pincus
PMCID: PMC49096  PMID: 11607293

Abstract

A common framework of finite state approximating Markov chains is developed for discrete time deterministic and stochastic processes. Two types of approximating chains are introduced: (i) those based on stationary conditional probabilities (time averaging) and (ii) transient, based on the percentage of the Lebesgue measure of the image of cells intersecting any given cell. For general dynamical systems, stationary measures for both approximating chains converge weakly to stationary measures for the true process as partition width converges to 0. From governing equations, transient chains and resultant approximations of all n-time unit probabilities can be computed analytically, despite typically singular true-process stationary measures (no density function). Transition probabilities between cells account explicitly for correlation between successive time increments. For dynamical systems defined by uniformly convergent maps on a compact set (e.g., logistic, Henon maps), there also is weak continuity with a control parameter. Thus all moments are continuous with parameter change, across bifurcations and chaotic regimes. Approximate entropy is seen as the information-theoretic rate of entropy for approximating Markov chains and is suggested as a parameter for turbulence; a discontinuity in the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy implies that in the physical world, some measure of coarse graining in a mixing parameter is required.

Full text

PDF
4432

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kaplan D. T., Furman M. I., Pincus S. M., Ryan S. M., Lipsitz L. A., Goldberger A. L. Aging and the complexity of cardiovascular dynamics. Biophys J. 1991 Apr;59(4):945–949. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82309-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pincus S. M. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 15;88(6):2297–2301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pincus S. M., Gladstone I. M., Ehrenkranz R. A. A regularity statistic for medical data analysis. J Clin Monit. 1991 Oct;7(4):335–345. doi: 10.1007/BF01619355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pincus S. M., Viscarello R. R. Approximate entropy: a regularity measure for fetal heart rate analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Feb;79(2):249–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schaffer W. M., Kot M. Nearly one dimensional dynamics in an epidemic. J Theor Biol. 1985 Jan 21;112(2):403–427. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(85)80294-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sugihara G., May R. M. Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):734–741. doi: 10.1038/344734a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES