Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jun 16;6:27858. doi: 10.1038/srep27858

Contribution of mono and polysaccharides to heterotrophic N2 fixation at the eastern Mediterranean coastline

E Rahav 1,a, M J Giannetto 2, E Bar-Zeev 3,b
PMCID: PMC4910064  PMID: 27306501

Abstract

N2 fixation should be a critical process in the nitrogen-poor surface water of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Despite favorable conditions, diazotroph abundance and N2 fixation rates remains low for reasons yet explained. The main goal of this study was to investigate the limiting nutrients for diazotrophy in this oligotrophic environment. Hence, we conducted dedicated bottle-microcosms with eastern Mediterranean Sea water that were supplemented with mono and polysaccharides as well as inorganic nitrogen and phosphorous. Our results indicate that the diazotrophic community expressing nifH was primarily represented by heterotrophic Proteobacteria. N2 fixation and heterotrophic bacterial activity increased up-to tenfold following two days of dark incubations, once seawater was supplemented with organic carbon substrate in the form of glucose (monosaccharides) or gum-xanthan (polysaccharide surrogate). Furthermore, our results point that carbon-rich polysaccharides, such as transparent exopolymer particles, enhance heterotrophic N2 fixation, by forming microenvironments of intense metabolic activity, high carbon: nitrogen ratio, and possibly low O2 levels. The conclusions of this study indicate that diazotrophs in the eastern Mediterranean coast are primarily limited by organic carbon substrates, as possibly in many other marine regions.


N2 fixation is an important source of new bioavailable N in oligotrophic marine systems. Due to the high energetic requirements of N2 fixation1, most studies have focused on phototrophic, bloom-forming diazotrophs such as Trichodesmium spp.2 or unicellular cyanobacteria3 that can harvest light as an energy source for primary production. Yet, planktonic heterotrophic proteobacterial diazotrophs may also be important contributors to N2 fixation4,5 and are widely distributed throughout numerous marine environments6,7,8.

Due to the high metabolic requirements of diazotrophy1, N2-fixing organisms are often limited by different nutrients such as phosphorus9, iron10, or both11. Recent studies demonstrated that diazotrophs may also be limited by the availability of dissolved organic carbon in various marine environments including the southwest Pacific12,13, the eastern tropical south Pacific14 and in oxygen minimum zones15,16.

The surface water of the eastern Mediterranean Sea (EMS) is a sunlit, warm and impoverish environment, with low concentrations of dissolved nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and carbon (C) at the surface17,18. These conditions have assigned the EMS as an ideal environment for diazotrophy to occur. Concurrently, during previous decades, geochemical evidences from sapropels with extremely low δ15N19 and water samples with high N:P20 also suggested that N2 fixation should be widespread across the EMS. Indeed, diazotrophs are often detected in the EMS and were previously reported to be highly diverse, with representatives from all known clusters21,22,23. Yet, only low N2 fixation rates (0 to 0.4 nmol N L−1 d−1) have been measured throughout the EMS18,23,24,25,26, with only one sporadic Trichodesmium bloom event ever reported27. The discrepancy between the potentially favorable conditions for diazotrophy and the low N2 fixation rates with the absence of diazotrophs blooms in the EMS was previously explained by phosphorus and/or iron limitations28, with inconclusive and inconsistent responses or trends.

In this study, we focused on the role of monosaccharides (i.e. glucose) and polysaccharides (i.e. transparent exopolymer particles) as limiting factors for bacterial metabolism and diazotrophic activity in the oligotrophic EMS. To do so, we conducted nutrient enrichment bioassays using surface EMS water during summertime when oligotrophy is at its peak. Our results indicate that the active diazotrophs community comprised mostly heterotrophic Proteobacterial diazotrophs that were primarily limited by organic carbon substrates and not phosphorus as previously hypothesized. The conclusions of this research shed new light on the role of heterotrophic diazotrophy and their limiting factors in the EMS; one of the most oligotrophic marine environments in the world.

Materials and Methods

Water sample collection

Surface water were collected from the EMS (32° 49′34.86 N, 34° 57′23.11 E, Haifa, Israel) by pumping seawater from a shallow (~5 m) station during the summer months; September 2013, June and August 2014. Seawater was sampled for inorganic nutrients, chlorophyll a, heterotrophic bacterial abundance, primary and bacterial production, respiration, transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), β-glucosidase activity, N2 fixation and sequencing of the nifH gene (genomic DNA [gDNA] and complementary DNA [cDNA]).

Nutrient addition experiment

Eight nutrient-enrichment microcosms (in biological triplicates) were carried out in 4.5L polycarbonate bottles using surface EMS water in September 2013. The incubation bottles were pre-washed with 10% hydrochloric acid and rinsed three times with Milli-Q water followed by three times with ambient seawater. Microcosms included (all concentrations are final): [1] no addition, [2] 0.1 μM K2HPO4 (P), [3] 1.6 μM NaNO3 (N), [4] 1 μM glucose (G), [5] NP, (6) GP, [7] GN and [8] GNP.

Microcosm bottles were incubated for 2 days in an outdoor pool with seawater flow-through to maintain ambient temperature (27–29 °C, Raveh et al.18) under natural light (representing full dial cycle) or under complete dark conditions. The darken bottles were also supplemented with a photosynthetic inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU, 50 nM final concentration) to favor heterotrophic activity29.

Polysaccharide-addition experiment

Gum-xanthan (GX) enriched microcosms (in biological triplicates) were conducted during August 2014 to elucidate the role of TEP as a labile carbon source for heterotrophic diazotrophy. Initially, surface EMS water was filtered through a 5-μm polycarbonate membrane filter (PALL Corp.) in order to retain most of the large aggregates. The pre-filtered water (4.5L) was either supplemented with gum-xanthan (300 μg L−1) or left unamended (controls) for two days under heterotrophic-favored conditions (i.e. dark and DCMU) as described above. GX was dissolved in deionized water (100 ml) and extensively homogenized (Thomas Scientific Model D1000) for 15 minutes as described by Rahav et al.29.

Inorganic nutrients

Triplicate water samples were collected in 15-mL acid-washed plastic scintillation vials and were immediately frozen (−20 °C). Nutrient concentrations were measured using a segmented flow Technicon Auto-Analyzer II (AA-II) system30. The limits of detection (twice the standard deviation of the blank) were 0.08 μM for nitrate + nitrite and 0.008 μM for phosphate.

Chlorophyll a extraction (chl.a)

Seawater samples (300 mL) were passed through a Whatman GF/F filter, extracted overnight in cold acetone (90%) under dark conditions and determined by the non-acidification method31 using a Turner Designs (Trilogy) fluorometer with 436 nm excitation and 680 nm emission filters.

Primary production (PP)

Photosynthetic carbon fixation rates were estimated using the 14C incorporation method32. See supplementary information for further details.

Bacterial production (BP)

Rates were estimated using the 3H-leucine (Amersham, specific activity: 160 Ci mmol−1) incorporation method33. A conversion factor of 1.5 kg C mol−1 per mole leucine incorporated was used, assuming an isotopic dilution of 2.034. See supplementary information for further details.

Heterotrophic bacterial abundance

Samples (1.8 mL) for bacterial abundance were collected, fixed with 50% glutaraldehyde (0.15% final conc. v/v., Sigma G7651), incubated in room temperature for 10 min, and frozen in liquid nitrogen until analyses. Prior to counting, samples were fast thawed at 37 °C and stained with 0.5 nM SYTO9 (Applied Biosystems) in the dark for 15 min35. Sub-samples (100 μL) were analyzed with an Attune acoustic focusing flow cytometer (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a syringe-based fluidic system at 408 and 488 nm wavelengths at a flow rate of 25 μl min−1. Beads (nominal size 0.93 μm) (Polysciences) were used as a size standard.

Dissolved oxygen (DO) and bacterial respiration rate (BR)

Oxygen was measured with the Winkler titration method modified by Carpenter36. Water was immediately fixed with MnSO4 and KI + NaOH and sealed without headspace in 300 mL Winkler bottles (Wheaton). Once oxygen was residue, H2SO4 was added to the samples and titrated with Na2S2O3 using a Metrohm 785 DMP titrino auto-burette and double platinum electrode (end-point titration precision, ±1 μmol L−1).

Bacterial respiration (BR) rates were determined according to the following equation:

graphic file with name srep27858-m1.jpg

Where DO(T0) is the initial dissolved oxygen concentration and DO(T48) is the dissolved oxygen concentration after two days of dark incubation. We assumed that BR accounted for 90% of the entire community respiration as both chl.a and primary production decreased in the same proportion under dark (with DCMU) conditions.

Bacterial carbon demand (BCD)

BCD was defined as the sum of carbon assimilation measured by bacterial production plus carbon oxidation through bacterial respiration. Oxygen respiration was converted into carbon consumption assuming a respiratory quotient (RQ) of 137,38.

Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) concentration

Water samples (100 mL) were filtered through 0.4 μm polycarbonate filters (GE Water & Process Technologies) under low pressure (<150 mbar) and stained for 5 sec with a 0.02% Alcian Blue solution and 0.06% acetic acid (pH = 2.5). The excess dye was removed with a quick Milli-Q water rinse. TEP concentrations (μg gum-xanthan equivalents L−1) were measured according to Passow and Alldredge39. A conversion factor of 0.74 was used to convert from micrograms of gum-xanthan (GX) to the equivalent micrograms of carbon40.

Beta-glucosidase activity (β-Glu)

The hydrolytic activity of β-glucosidase was determined by analysis of cleavage rates of a conjugated fluorogenic substrate, 4-methylumbelliferyl (MUF)-β-D-glucopyranoside (Sigma M3633) as described in Hoppe41. Briefly, substrate was added to a 1 mL water sample (final concentration of 50 μM) in triplicates and incubated in the dark at ambient temperature for one day. The increase in fluorescence was measured at 365 nm excitation, 455 nm emissions (GloMax®-Multi Detection System E9032) and calibrated against a MUF standard. A conversion factor of 72 nM MUF to μg carbon was applied as described in Bar-Zeev and Rahav38.

N2 fixation analyses

Rates of N2 fixation were measured using the 15N2-enriched seawater method42. 15N2 enriched seawater was prepared by injecting 1:100 (v/v) 15N2 gas (99%, Cambridge Isotopes) into filtered (0.2 μm, PALL) and degassed (MiniModule G543) seawater collected at the study site. The enriched seawater stock was then vigorously shaken to completely dissolve the 15N2 gas, and aliquots (225 mL) were added to the experimental bottles (5% of total sample volume). After two days of incubation under either ambient light or complete dark conditions, the samples were filtered through pre-combusted (450 °C, 4.5 h) 25 mm Whatman GF/F and dried overnight in an oven at 60 °C. The samples were analyzed on a CE Instruments NC2500 elemental analyzer interfaced to a Thermo-Finningan Delta Plus XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). For isotope ratio mass spectrometry, a standard curve to determine N mass was generated for each sample run. Based on natural abundance, N mass on the filters, incubation times, and precision of the mass spectrometer, our calculated detection limit for 15N uptake was 0.02 nmol N L−1 d−1.

Extraction and sequencing of the nifH gene

Samples (1L) were filtered through 0.2 μm Supor filters (PALL Corp.) and placed in a sterile DNase/Rnase Free Whirl-Pak bag. The samples were than snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. DNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method according to Man-Aharonovich et al.21. RNA extraction was carried with a mirVana RNA isolation kit (Ambion). Genomic DNA (gDNA) contamination was removed using the DNase I digestion Turbo DNA-free kit (Ambion) and removal was verified by PCR (16S universal primers 519F-1492R) prior to reverse transcription. Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was accomplished using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) following manufacturer’s instructions.

Nitrogenase Fe protein transcripts (nifH) were amplified using a nested PCR strategy43. A paired-end sequencing of either DNA or cDNA was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform at the Research and Testing Laboratories (Lubbock, TX, USA). See supplementary information for further details.

Sequencing analysis

Merged Illumina reads were quality filtered and analyzed with the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline44. The remaining reads were binned into operational taxonomic units (OTUs), defined at 97% similarity, using the UCLUST algorithm45. Taxonomy was assigned with BLAST and a database of nifH sequences from Heller et al.46. Phylogenetic trees were generated with FastTree in QIIME47, and visualized with the Interactive Tree of Life (IToL) and Topiary Explorer v1.0 packages.

Many of the OTUs were unidentifiable, and therefore nifH sequences from representative phototrophs and heterotrophs were added to the trees as outgroups, using Anabaena sphaerica for rooting (Table S1). OTUs that clustered with either a phototrophic or a heterotrophic outgroup were considered phototrophs or heterotrophs, respectively. Further details on quality filtering criteria and sequencing data analyses are indicated in the supplementary information.

Statistical analyses

Changes in bacterial production, primary production, bacterial carbon demand, β-glucosidase and N2 fixation rates in the different treatments were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Fisher LSD multiple comparison post hoc test with a confidence of 95% (α = 0.05). A Pearson linear correlation was carried out between N2 fixation and bacterial cell specific activity and TEP (α = 0.05). All statistic tests were done using the XLSTAT software.

Results and Discussion

Physicochemical and biological characteristics of the study site

The coastal water was characterized by typical EMS summer conditions, with warm, saline and well-oxidized conditions (Table 1). Average dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus were in the lower end of oligotrophic environments30, resulting in basal chl.a concentrations (phytoplankton proxy) and low primary production rates (Table 1). Heterotrophic bacterial abundance and production rates remained unchanged in all sampling dates (Table 1) and were similar to previously reported summertime concentrations and rates in the EMS18,48.

Table 1. The physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the EMS water collected at the study site during the summer months. Values are the averages and their standard deviations from three experiments.

Parameter Units September 2013 August 2014 June 2014
Temperature °C 27.9 28.6 26.6
Salinity 39.4 39.4 39.4
Oxygen μM 195 205 219 ± 2
NO2 + NO3 μM 0.37 0.26 0.20
PO4 μM 0.01 0.01 0.02
TEP μg GX L−1 95 ± 20 156 ± 28 100 ± 22
Chl.a μg L−1 0.30 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.03 0.22 ± 0.03
Primary production μg C L−1 d−1 1.95 ± 0.21 1.83 ± 0.15 1.41 ± 0.15
Bacterial abundance Cells L−1 × 108 3.60 ± 0.52 4.95 3.56 ± 0.05
Bacterial production μg C L−1 d−1 0.42 ± 0.07 0.67 ± 0.15 0.77 ± 0.05
N2 fixation nmol N L−1 d−1 0.15 ± 0.04 0.11 ± 0.03 0.10 ± 0.02

The diazotrophic community, based on nifH DNA analyses, was represented by both heterotrophic bacteria and autotrophic cyanobacteria (Fig. 1). The retrieved sequences converged into ten distinct groups ascribed to clusters I and III49. We acknowledge that since only 1-L of water was sampled, species with low abundances such as Trichodesmium may have been overlooked. Yet, based on previous studies in the EMS, bloom-forming N2 fixers such as Trichodesmium were rarely detected, even after the filtration of ~20-L of seawater21,22. Although the EMS is presumably an ideal environment for cyanobacterial diazotrophs (sunlit, warm and nitrogen-poor, Table 1), studies spanning over a decade have determined that most of the diazotrophs species cluster within the Proteobacterial clades, mainly composed of alpha, beta and gamma-proteobacteria21,23. Our results indicate that the diazotrophic diversity was highly compatible with long-term summer observations of the coastal and open EMS21,22,23.

Figure 1. A phylogenetic tree of nifH gDNA OTUs obtained from the coastal EMS water.

Figure 1

Bootstrap values exceeding 50% are indicated above the branches. Values are reported for neighbor-joining (NJ) analyses. The asterisk represents outgroups of common phototrophic and heterotrophic diazotrophs (more details in Table S1).

Concurrent with the absence of bloom forming cyanobacterial diazotrophs, measured N2 fixation rates were overall low (Table 1) and similar to those measured in the open24,25,26,50 and coastal18 EMS water. Currently, the reasons for the absence of large bloom forming diazotrophs or the low N2 fixation rates in this nitrogen-poor system are unknown.

Phosphorus was the most studied limiting nutrient in the EMS due to the high N:P ratio in its deep water suggesting that diazotrophs are hindered by P availability. Therefore, only P, P + Fe or dust were examined to date as a diazotrophy-limiting nutrients in the surface of the EMS26,28. Yet, the addition of P yielded inconclusive responses with insignificant changes in N2 fixation rates across the Levantine Basin during July 200950 and a 3-fold increase during June-July 200828. Concurrently, dust additions were found to elevated N2 fixation via the release of P and Fe28 and/or by supplying airborne diazotrophs associate with the dust particles51.

A recent study across the Mediterranean Sea determined that N2 fixation measured under dark conditions equaled the rates retrieved under ambient light50. These results suggest that heterotrophic diazotrophs play a significant role in supplying new bioavailable nitrogen to the Mediterranean Sea6,12. Heterotrophic diazotrophs, unlike phototrophs (e.g. Trichodesmium and Crocosphaera), cannot harvest light through photosynthesis to maintain the energetic needs of the nitrogenase complex. Instead, these organisms scavenge and mineralize organic substrates. Assuming heterotrophic diazotrophs are important contributors to N2 fixation in the EMS8,50, we postulated that the prime factor that limits diazotrophy is organic carbon.

Diazotrophic feedback to the addition of organic carbon

Our results indicate that N2 was primarily fixed by heterotrophic-bacterial diazotrophs under ambient light (Fig. 2A–C) and dark (Fig. 2D–F) conditions once organic carbon was not limiting. Incubating EMS water under ambient light conditions with the different nutrient additions did not affect phytoplankton concentrations (ranging from 0.27 to 0.43 μg chl.a L−1); apart than NP addition which triggered elevated phytoplankton biomass (1.60 μg chl.a L−1). These results are in agreement with previous studies from the EMS indicating that phytoplankton (not-necessarily diazotrophs) are co-limited by N and P52.

Figure 2. Physiological response of nutrient additions on N2 fixation.

Figure 2

Bottle microcosms were incubated for 48 h with different nutrient additions, under ambient light (A–C) and dark +DCMU (D–F) conditions. Primary production, PP (A,D), bacterial production, BP (B,E) and N2 fixation rates (C,F) measured in response to various nutrient supplements. Control (Cont.); phosphorus (P); nitrogen (N); glucose (G); nitrogen + phosphorus (NP); glucose + phosphorus (GP); glucose + nitrogen (GN); glucose + nitrogen + phosphorus (GNP). The letters above the columns represent significant differences (one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD means comparison test, P < 0.05) for mean values between additions.

Similarly, no significant changes were found in heterotrophic bacterial abundance across the different microcosms (6 × 108 to 8 × 108 cells L−1, one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD means comparison test, P > 0.05). However, following glucose additions (G, GN, GP and GNP), primary production significantly decreased (Fig. 2A), while bacterial production drastically increased (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that glucose (as an organic carbon surrogate), rather than phosphorus52, is the prime limiting nutrient for heterotrophic bacterial activity at our study site (EMS). It is likely that once organic carbon is present and bacterial growth is prompt, both N and P become the limiting factors for bacterial activity. Further, we suggest that phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria are competing for the available nutrients as previously found in open sea EMS48,52.

At the end of the light incubations, N2 fixation rates were overall low (<0.5 nmol N L−1 d−1) and similar to values across the EMS24,50. However, when G was added (G, GN, GP, GNP), N2 fixation rates were enhanced by 2 to 7 fold compared with the control microcosms (Fig. 2C). The compatibility between the increased bacterial biomass and activity with the elevated N2 fixation rates indicate that diazotrophic heterotrophs are the prime N2-fixing organisms in our system once organic carbon is available. We surmise that the overall low N2 fixation rates, even under ambient light conditions that hypothetically should favor cyanobacterial diazotrophs, result from a competition with phytoplankton for any available N or P that are essential for bacterial metabolism.

In the experiment where microcosms were incubated under dark conditions, phytoplankton concentrations were low regardless of the supplements combinations and ranged between 0.10 to 0.23 μg chl.a L−1. Correspondingly, primary production rates were significantly lower than under the light condition, with negligible changes between the different microcosms, apart than NP (Fig. 2D). Similarly to the microcosm incubations conducted under ambient light, heterotrophic bacterial abundance remained unchanged, regardless of the different nutrient additions (6 × 108 to 10 × 108 cells L−1, one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD means comparison test, P > 0.05). However, bacterial production rates increased once glucose was added, and peaked (4.7 ± 0.2 μg C L−1 d−1) in the microcosms containing the GNP addition (Fig. 2E). N2 fixation rates, similarly to the bacterial production, were significantly higher following glucose additions and drastically increased (12 fold) with GNP supplements (Fig. 2F). Since phototrophic activity was suppressed by the long—dark incubations, it is highly likely that only heterotrophs and facultative microorganisms could utilize the available nutrients and proliferate. Hence, the high N2 fixation rates measured in the dark microcosms- especially following glucose addition (up to 3.84 nmol N L−1 d−1), were mostly attributed to heterotrophic diazotrophs.

Furthermore, based on nifH gene expression, 56% of the active diazotrophic communities in the control bottle microcosms were heterotrophs following two days of dark conditions (Fig. 3). These clusters were represented mostly by alpha-Proteobacteria phylotypes as well as by marine Stromatolites; a complex community of benthic heterotrophic Protobacteria and phototrophic heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria53. In the glucose supplemented microcosms (G, GN, GP and GNP) the relative abundance of these heterotrophic nifH expression bacteria increased up to 85% highlighting their importance to N2 fixation (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. The relative abundance of phototrophic and heterotrophic nifH cDNA OTUs.

Figure 3

Samples were collected from microcosms that underwent 48 h of incubations in complete dark + DCMU conditions under various nutrient-enriched scenarios. The phototrophy—heterotrophy nature of the nifH OTUs was determined by clustering to the known sequences listed in Table S1, similar to the analysis performed in Fig. 1.

The biochemical and phylogenetic results indicate that during the summer period at the EMS coastline, active diazotrophs are mostly heterotrophs and often limited by organic carbon. Furthermore, our results point on a strong dependence between the availability of organic carbon in the form of glucose, bacterial metabolism and N2 fixation by heterotrophic diazotrophs. Once monosaccharides such as glucose are available, assimilated carbon can be directed to meet the energetic demands of the nitrogenase complex and prompt N2 fixation1. The above results are in agreement with reports from other aquatic regions such as the South Pacific Ocean12,13,14 and from oxygen minimum zones15,16.

Glucose metabolism by bacterial heterotrophs may cause a rapid uptake of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus, thus leading to nutrient stress. Therefore, when glucose is available in addition to phosphorous and/or nitrogen, the activity of bacteria, including of heterotrophic diazotrophs, intensifies, resulting in high N2 fixation rates (Fig. 2F). This trend was also observed following addition of a mixture of amino-acids (typically composed by organic carbon and nitrogen) to surface water in the Solomon and Bismarck seas13, the aphotic water in the eastern Tropical south Pacific Ocean15 and the northern Red Sea29.

The dependence on organic carbon and nutrient availability was further highlighted by the positive linear correlation between heterotrophic cell-specific activity (bacterial production per cell) and N2 fixation (Fig. 4A). This relationship points that supplementing the EMS water with glucose enhanced heterotrophic bacterial cell specific activity, which was tunneled into the energetically expensive N2 fixation process1. Taken together the above results indicate on a complex regulation of heterotrophic or possibly mixotrophic diazotrophs activity by varying nutrients and combinations, but primarily due to organic carbon availability.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The relationship between N2 fixation and heterotrophic cell-specific activity (A) and TEP (B). Microcosms were conducted under dark + DCMU incubations for 48 h. Each nutrient addition type has a different color-code. Note that the GNP treatments were not included in the linear correlation. A Pearson linear correlation was carried out between N2 fixation and bacterial cell specific activity and TEP (P < 0.05).

Another indication of the importance of organic carbon to diazotrophy is the positive and significant relationship between N2 fixation and carbon-rich polysaccharides in the form of TEP measured in the different microcosms (Fig. 4B). TEP are acidic polysaccharide hydrogels, intensely sticky, three-dimensional-supramolecular networks, ranging in size from ~0.4 to >200 μm, and ubiquitous in marine54 and freshwater38 environments. TEP may serve as a surface and substrate for planktonic organisms such as heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria, thus forming microenvironments of intense microbial activity with high carbon to nitrogen content40,54. A recent study has suggested that these carbon-rich hydrogels may also act as favorable “hotspots” for diazotrophy in oligotrophic conditions8.

Impact of carbon-rich polysaccharides on heterotrophic N2 fixation

Carbohydrate-microgels such as TEP were found to promote heterotrophic bacterial activity and N2 fixation in dedicated polysaccharide-enriched microcosms (Fig. 5). EMS water was first pre-filtered (5 μm) before they were distributed into the different microcosms, thus removing 60% of the phytoplankton biomass and reducing TEP by approximately 80% (Table 2). However, the pre-filtration step did not change the bacterial abundance (Table 2). The filtrate was then supplemented with gum xanthan (GX); a commercially available polysaccharide comprised mostly of mannose, glucuronic acid and glucose54. The added GX was ~50% of the TEP concentration usually found in the EMS surface17, thus represents a moderate yet realistic scenario.

Figure 5. Physiological response of GX additions (TEP proxy) on N2 fixation.

Figure 5

Changes in N2 fixation (A), the proportion of the nifH expressing phototrophic and heterotrophic diazotrophs detected in the recovered cDNA (B), β-glucosidase activity rates (C) and bacterial carbon demand (D) following GX addition. Bottles were incubated for 48 h under dark + DCMU conditions. The asterisks above the columns represent significant differences (one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD means comparison test, P < 0.05) for mean values between additions.

Table 2. The effect of GX addition on pre-filtered (5-μm) surface water collected in June 2014 and incubated under the dark and DCMU conditions for two days.

Parameter Units Initial filtered (T0) Control-no addition (T48) GX addition (T48) GX: Control (ratio)
Bacterial abundance Cell × 108 L−1 3.14 3.78 ± 0.57 6.58 ± 0.42 1.8 ± 0.3
Bacterial respiration μg C L−1 d−1 N.A. 211 ± 26 304 ± 19 1.5 ± 0.2
Bacterial production μg C L−1 d−1 0.48 ± 0.08 1.09 ± 0.06 1.94 ± 0.10 1.8 ± 0.2
TEP μg GX L−1 19 45 ± 20 103 ± 24 2.9 ± 1.7
Chl.a μg L−1 0.14 0.03 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.02 0.8 ± 1.0
Primary production μg C L−1 d−1 0.89 0.08 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 0.5 ± 0.2

Values are the averages and their standard deviations from three replicates and their corresponding GX: Control ratio. N.A. means the data are not available. Significance was tested by one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD means comparison test, P < 0.05.

The addition of GX as a pure TEP surrogate triggered a 10-fold increase in N2 fixation relative to the control microcosms following two days of dark incubations (Fig. 5A). Concurrent with the elevated N2 fixation, a substantial increase in the abundance of heterotrophs that expressed the nifH genes was found following GX addition (2.5 fold compare to the control, Fig. 5B). Similarly to the previous experiment (Fig. 3), the majority of these nifH expressing diazotrophs were associated with Proteobacterial phylotypes.

We suggest that the elevated N2 fixation rates were mediated by biodegradation and metabolism of polysaccharides such as GX by heterotrophic diazotrophs. β-glucosidase is one of various ectoenzymes that are secreted by bacteria to hydrolyze polysaccharides (such as TEP) into bio-available molecules54,55. Indeed, β-glucosidase activity increased by 45% once GX was supplemented (Fig. 5C). At the same time, bacterial production and respiration were enhanced by 80% and 50% respectively (Table 2), corresponding to a 50% increase in heterotrophic bacterial carbon demand (BCD) when compared to the control microcosms (Fig. 5D). The BCD reflects the total carbon biomass that is required to sustain the metabolic demands of heterotrophic bacteria56. Our results indicate that TEP hydrolysis of GX by β-glucosidase accounted for 75 μg C L−1 d−1, which was approximately 15% of the total BCD (Table 2, Fig. 5). Yet, the direct contribution of polysaccharide hydrolysis to heterotrophic diazotrophs carbon demand is currently unclear.

Based on our results, we propose three, not mutually exclusive pathways, in which TEP can support heterotrophic diazotrophy: (i) TEP are often found as bio-aggregates that are heavily colonized by bacterial communities38,57. These tight bacteria-hydrogel associations may enhance polysaccharide hydrolysis by increasing the efficiency of ectoenzymes such as β-glucosidase58; thereby support the high energetic requirements of N2 fixation1. (ii) TEP comprises high C:N ratio40,54. Therefore, as carbon availability enhances heterotrophic bacterial activity, nitrogen becomes the limiting factor and therefore diazotrophy is promoted26. (iii) It was estimated that diazotrophs (such as Crocosphaera watsonii) direct approximately 60% of the energetic costs of N2 fixation to remove intracellular oxygen since nitrogenase is an oxygen-sensitive protein1. Large aggregates (>1 mm) may result in oxygen gradients that decrease from the surface to the anaerobic center59. The anoxic conditions within large aggregates, such as TEP, may benefit heterotrophic diazotrophs by shielding the nitrogenase complex from extracellular oxygen, thus reducing the overall energetic requirements and promoting N2 fixation. Similarly, Pseudomonas stutzeri strain BAL361 isolate from the Baltic Sea surface water formed aggregates (1–4 mm), which controlled O2 diffusion into the cells and facilitate N2 fixation under an oxygenated environment60. We postulate that bacterial diazotrophs associated with bioavailable hydrogels are not restricted solely to TEP, but would be found with other types of bioaggregates in the aquatic environment such as marine snow, fecal pellets and detritus matter.

Conclusions

The oligotrophic EMS is presumably an ideal environment for diazotrophy, and yet, for over a decade, only low N2 fixation rates have been measured throughout with no reports of basin-wide diazotrophs blooms. The results of this study indicate that N2 was fixed primarily by heterotrophic bacteria. Furthermore, we highlight, for the first time, that the prime limiting factor for heterotrophic bacterial diazotrophs, in the EMS is organic carbon (Figs 2 and 5) rather than phosphorus as previously suggested. In fact, we show that only when organic carbon is provided in the form of monosaccharides (glucose) or polysaccharides (e.g. TEP), which results in high C:N ratio, bacterial metabolism and biological N2 fixation are intensified. Such carbon-rich inputs are often occurring along the Israeli coast as well as other coastal environments along the Mediterranean Sea from various anthropogenic sources. These coastal water masses, along with its subsequent nutrients and possibly carbon-fueled diazotrophs, routinely intrudes into the open EMS and therefore may pose an important ecological role on both the coastal and open EMS water. A better understanding of the link between heterotrophic bacterial-diazotrophs and organic carbon supplements such as carbon-rich TEP hydrogels might prove critical, as climate change predicts an expansion of oligotrophy in many marine and coastal environments. Under these circumstances, microenvironments such as TEP might benefit with diazotrophs, and thereby hold important ecological significance not only to carbon sequestration but also to the nitrogen cycle.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Rahav, E. et al. Contribution of mono and polysaccharides to heterotrophic N2 fixation at the eastern Mediterranean coastline. Sci. Rep. 6, 27858; doi: 10.1038/srep27858 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep27858-s1.doc (69.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

We thank Galit Ovadia for her assistance in gDNA and cDNA extractions. Special thanks to Karen Dannemiller and Lilach Baoumer for the English editing and reading that greatly improved this manuscript. We also thank the Roy J. Zuckerberg Career Development Chair for Water Research. This work was supported by grants awarded by the Ministry of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources (3–11519) to E.R, by the Ministry of environmental Protection (145–1–2) to E.R and N.K and by the PERSEUS project (EC Contract 287600).

Footnotes

Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: E.R. and E.B.-Z. Performed the experiments: E.R. Analyzed the data: E.R. and E.B.-Z. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: E.R. and G.M.J. Wrote the paper: E.R. and E.B.-Z.

References

  1. Großkopf T. & Laroche J. Direct and indirect costs of dinitrogen fixation in Crocosphaera watsonii WH8501 and possible implications for the nitrogen cycle. Frontiers in microbiology 3, 236 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Capone D. G., Zehr J. P., Paerl H. W., Bergman B. & Carpenter E. J. Trichodesmium, a globally significant marine cyanobacterium. Science 276, 1221–1229 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  3. Zehr J. P. Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Trends in microbiology 19, 162–173 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Halm H. et al. Heterotrophic organisms dominate nitrogen fixation in the South Pacific Gyre. The ISME journal 6, 1238–1249 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farnelid H., Bentzon-tilia M., Andersson A. F. & Bertilsson S. Active nitrogen-fixing heterotrophic bacteria at and below the chemocline of the central Baltic Sea. The ISME journal 7, 1413–1423 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Riemann L., Farnelid H. & Steward G. Nitrogenase genes in non-cyanobacterial plankton: prevalence, diversity and regulation in marine waters. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 61, 235–247 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. Bentzon-Tilia M. et al. Significant N2 fixation by heterotrophs, photoheterotrophs and heterocystous cyanobacteria in two temperate estuaries. The ISME journal 1–13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rahav E. et al. Dinitrogen fixation in aphotic oxygenated marine environments. Frontiers in Microbiology 4, 227 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dyhrman S. T. & Haley S. T. Phosphorus scavenging in the unicellular marine diazotroph Crocosphaera watsonii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72, 1452–1458 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berman-Frank I., Cullen J. T., Shaked Y., Sherrell R. M. & Falkowski P. G. Iron availability, cellular iron quotas, and nitrogen fixation in Trichodesmium. Limnology and Oceanography 46, 1249–1260 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  11. Mills M. M., Ridame C., Davey M., La Roche J. & Geider R. J. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature 429, 292–294 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moisander P. H. et al. Analogous nutrient limitations in unicellular diazotrophs and Prochlorococcus in the South Pacific Ocean. The ISME journal 6, 733–744 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Benavides M. et al. Mesopelagic N2 fixation related to organic matter composition in the Solomon and Bismarck Seas (Southwest Pacific). Plos One 10, e0143775 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dekaezemacker J. et al. Evidence of active dinitrogen fixation in surface waters of the eastern tropical South Pacific during El Niño and la Niña events and evaluation of its potential nutrient controls. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 27, 768–779 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonnet S. et al. Aphotic N2 fixation in the eastern tropical south Pacific Ocean. PloS one 8, e81265 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Loescher C. R. et al. Facets of diazotrophy in the oxygen minimum zone waters off Peru. The ISME journal 8,1–13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bar-Zeev E. et al. Transparent exopolymer particle (TEP) dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 431, 107–118 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  18. Raveh O., David N., Rilov G. & Rahav E. The temporal dynamics of coastal phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Plos One 10, e0140690 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sachs J. P. & Repeta D. J. Oligotrophy and nitrogen fixation during Eastern Mediterranean sapropel events. Science 286, 2485–2488 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bethoux J. P., Morin P. Madec C. & Gentili B. Phosphorus and nitrogen behavoir in the Mediterranean Sea. Deep-Sea Research 39, 1641–1654 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  21. Man-Aharonovich D., Kress N., Zeev E. B., Berman-Frank I. & Béjà O. Molecular ecology of nifH genes and transcripts in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Environmental microbiology 9, 2354–2363 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bar-Zeev E. et al. Seasonal dynamics of the endosymbiotic, nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. The ISME journal 2, 911–923 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yogev T. et al. Is dinitrogen fixation significant in the Levantine Basin, East Mediterranean Sea?  Environmental microbiology 13, 854–871 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ibello V., Cantoni C., Cozzi S. & Civitarese G. First basin-wide experimental results on N2 fixation in the open Mediterranean Sea. Geophysical Research Letters 37, 1–5 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. Bonnet S., Grosso O. & Moutin T. Planktonic dinitrogen fixation along a longitudinal gradient across the Mediterranean Sea during the stratified period (BOUM cruise). Biogeosciences 8, 2257–2267 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  26. Rahav E. et al. Uncoupling between dinitrogen fixation and primary productivity in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118, 195–202 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. Spatharis S., Skliris N. & Meziti A. First record of a Trichodesmium erythraeum bloom in the Mediterranean Sea. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 69, 1444–1455 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  28. Ridame C., Guieu C. & L’Helguen S. Strong stimulation of N2 fixation in oligotrophic Mediterranean Sea: Results from dust addition in large in situ mesocosms. Biogeosciences 10, 7333–7346 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  29. Rahav E. et al. Heterotrophic and autotrophic contribution to dinitrogen fixation in the Gulf of Aqaba. Marine Ecology Progress Series 522, 67–77 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  30. Kress N. & Herut B. Spatial and seasonal evolution of dissolved oxygen and nutrients in the Southern Levantine Basin (Eastern Mediterranean Sea): chemical characterization of the water masses and inferences on the N:P ratios. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 48, 2347–2372 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  31. Welschmeyer N. A. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and pheopigments. Limnology and Oceanography 39, 1985–1992 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  32. Steemann-Nielsen E. On the determination of the activity for measuring primary production. J Cons Int Explor Mer 18, 117–140 (1952). [Google Scholar]
  33. Simon M., Alldredge A. & Azam F. Bacterial carbon dynamics on marine snow. Marine Ecology Progress Series 65, 205–211 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  34. Simon M., Alldredge A. & Azam F. Protein-content and protein-synthesis rates of planktonic marine-bacteria. Marine Ecology Progress Series 51, 201–213 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  35. Vaulot D. & Marie D. Diel variability of photosynthetic picoplankton in the equatorial Pacific. Applied and environmental microbiology 104, 3297–3310 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  36. Carpenter J. H. The Chesapeake bay institute technique for the Winkler dissolved oxygen method. Limnology and Oceanography 10, 141–143 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  37. Del Giorgio P. a. & Cole, J. J. Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 503–541 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  38. Bar-zeev E. & Rahav E. Microbial metabolism of transparent exopolymer particles during the summer months along a eutrophic estuary system. Frontiers in microbiology 6, 1–13 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Passow U. & Alldredge A. L. A dye-binding assay for the spectrophotometric measurement of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP). Limonology And Oceanography 40, 1326–1335 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  40. Engel a. & Passow U. Carbon and nitrogen content of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in relation to their Alcian Blue adsorption. Marine Ecology Progress Series 219, 1–10 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoppe H.-G. Significance of exoenzymatic activities in the ecology of brackish water: measurements by means of methylumbelliferyl-substrates . Marine Ecology Progress Series 11, 299–308 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  42. Mohr W., Großkopf T., Wallace D. W. R. & Laroche J. Methodological underestimation of oceanic nitrogen fixation rates. PLos One 49, (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zehr J. P. & McReynolds L. A. Use of degenerate oligonucleotides for amplification of the nifH gene from the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium thiebautii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55, 2522–2526 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Caporaso J. G., Kuczynski J. & Stombaugh J. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7, 335–336 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Edgar R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Heller P., Tripp H. J., Turk-Kubo K. & Zehr J. P. ARBitrator: A software pipeline for on-demand retrieval of auto-curated nifH sequences from GenBank. Bioinformatics 30, 1–8 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Price M. N., Dehal P. S. & Arkin A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26, 1641–1650 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pulido-Villena E., Ghiglione J. F., Ortega-Retuerta E., Van-Wambeke F. & Zohary T. In Life in the Mediterranean Sea: A Look at Habitat Changes 227–265 (Nova Science Publishers, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  49. Chien Y. T. & Zinder S. H. Cloning, functional organization, transcript studies, and phylogenetic analysis of the complete nitrogenase structural genes (nifHDK2) and associated genes in the archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri 227. Journal of Bacteriology 178, 143–148 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rahav E., Herut B., Levi Adi, Mulholland M. R. & Berman-Frank I. Springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across the Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Science 9, 489–498 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  51. Rahav E., Ovadia G., Paytan A. & Herut B. Contribution of airborne microbes to bacterial production and N2 fixation in seawater upon aerosol deposition. Geophys. Research Letters. 43, 1–9 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  52. Zohary T. et al. P-limited bacteria but N and P co-limited phytoplankton in the Eastern Mediterranean—a microcosm experiment. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 52, 3011–3023 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  53. Steppe T. F., Pinckney J. L., Dyble J. & Paerl H. W. Diazotrophy in Modern Marine Bahamian Stromatolites. Microbial ecology 41, 36–44 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Bar-Zeev E., Passow U., Romero-Vargas Castrillón S. & Elimelech M. Transparent exopolymer particles: from aquatic environments and engineered systems to membrane biofouling. Environmental Science & Technology 49, 691–707 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Radić T., Ivancić I., Fuks D. & Radić J. Marine bacterioplankton production of polysaccharidic and proteinaceous particles under different nutrient regimes. FEMS microbiology ecology 58, 333–342 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ducklow H. W. et al. Constraining bacterial production, conversion efficiency and respiration in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, January–February, 1997. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 47, 3227–3247 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  57. Bar-Zeev E., Berman-Frank I., Girshevitz O. & Berman T. Revised paradigm of aquatic biofilm formation facilitated by microgel transparent exopolymer particles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 9119–9124 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Azam F. & Malfatti F. Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nature reviews Microbiology 5, 782–791 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Klawonn I., Bonaglia S., Bruchert V. & Ploug H. Aerobic and anaerobic nitrogen transformation processes in N2-fixing cyanobacterial aggregates. The ISME Jornal 9, 1456–1466 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Bentzon-Tilia M., Severin I., Hansen L. H. & Riemann L. Bacteria Isolated from Estuarine Surface Water. American Society for Microbiology 6, 1–11 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep27858-s1.doc (69.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES